IMPROVING STUDENTS' ABILITY IN SPEAKING THROUGH GUIDED DIALOGUES BY GROUPING SYSTEM TO THE FIRST YEAR STUDENTS OF SLTPN 1 BONDOWOSO
IIlii PERPUSTAIMI
tJlflVRISITU
JDia
IMPROVING STUDENTS' ABILITY IN SPEAKING THROUGH
GUIDED DIALOGUES BY GROUPING SYSTEM
TO THE FIRST YEAR STUDENTS
OF SLTPN 1 BONDOWOSO
REPORT
WRITING
ｾ
Ｍ
ｾ
ＭＮｾｮ＠
s
l.j..?.8 ,1
LILIES SURYANINGSIH
ｎｬｾ＠
: 990210401452
TEACHER TRAINING AND EDUCATION FACULTY
JEMBER UNIVERSITY
2000
MOTTO ·
Where there ls will there is way ( anonym )
il
DEDICATION
Tl1i :; H• ' l>iwl
1.
ｬｾ･＠
Hy l.Jeloved
2. My
My
ｾ＠ J •
f"ly
t f-j Dedi ･［ｴＱ
Ｎ ｾＮＺ､＠
l i Ut-:tJH!t d
be!tJYf!d UIO ｌｴｈｾＡﾷ＠
:L Mv he luii>:!U
4.
i I. i og
ｴｾｯＧＭＢ｝ｉｖｦＺＮｻｊ＠
SOT\
n.J n,;JJW.:1l.f:t·
ｴ Ｎ ｈｾ＠
J ｯｶｾ､＠
t·o ｬ･ｵｾ｜ＮｴＺＡｈ＠
i ij
1'(1
IMPROVING
ABILITY IN SPEAKING THR00GH
ｓｔｕｄｅｎｾ＠
GUIDED DIALOGUES BY GROUPING SYSTEM
TO THK FIRST YKAR STUDENTS
OF SLTPN 1 BONDOWOSO
REPORT WRITING
Presented to
Faculty of Teacher training and Education
Jember University in Partial Fulfillment
of the Requirements for Completing the
Sarjana Program in the Department of
English Education
Name
- LILIES SURYANINGSIH
NIM
- 990210401452
The Level Class · 1999
Depar-t.ment
· Language and Art
Spec ialization
- Knglish. Kd:ucation
Place of Birth
- Bondowoso
Date of Bil:'th
:. August 16 th
Approved by 'l.'he Advisor
iv
1965
APPROVAL SHEET
This
report
writlug
ia appJ'·oved
exminaLio11 commi t.t.ee of Tead1er
Faculty?
and
recleved
Training
by the
and
Education
ed on the 1994 curriculwn, Engllsl1 belongs to the
main :.mbject and still emphasizes on reading abilit.y _
Howover speaking ia ｣ｯｮ｡ｩ､･ｲｾ＠
as one of tl1e important
aub.ject in teaching learning English for coawunication.
TI1er•e in no s p ecial
technique on teacl1ing speaking .for
the rirnL year 3tudents o£ SI.TP, tl1ercfore ttle write.r
conduct-ed t.hls action reaearcll to tl1e first year students
of SL'fP through guided dialogues ｢ｾｲ＠
grouping system in
order to enable tl1ern to express Llleir idea in spoken
language.
The design o£ this research was descriptive qualitative .
The subject. of this research were lC "students' of SLTPN 1
Bondowouo. The teclu1ique that wai; used to collect data
was that the teacl1er implemented the guided dialogues by
grouping ayst.em and observed the .improvement of the first
cycle to the second cycle.
'l'he ｷｲｩｴ･ｾ｡＠
data analysis in the reaseacl1 was done by
､･Ｆｾｲｩ｢ｮｧ＠
the students' ability in expt--ea:;.sing their id€4
in :31:-X>ken language which involved pronunciation,. vocabuｬ｡ｲｹｾ＠
grammar and fluency.
The t'eBul t
al1owed that guided dialogues by gr-ouping
system improve tl1e students ability in speaking with the
average score of ＳｾＴＶ＠
at tl1e end of cycle two.
xi
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
TITI.R
i
Morro
ii
mml CATi ()N
lii
iv
CONSULTANT' S APPROVAL
1\PPHOVAL OF EXAHINKR TRAM
v
1\CKNOWLRDGRHRNT
vi
TABLE OF' CONTKNTE
vii
LIST Oll TABLE
xi
ABSTRACT
CHAPTER I
INTRODUCTION
1. J Background of tlle Research
1
1. 2 Problem of the Researcl1
2
1 . 3 Scope of The Research
2
1 _4 Purpose o.f the Research
3
1.5 S ignificance of the Research
4
CHAP"l'ER II
THEORET I CAL FRAMEWORK
2.1 Speaking Ability
5
£.2 Language Components of Speaking Ability
6
2.2.1 Pronunciation
6
2.2.2 Grammar
7
2.2.3 Vocabulary
8
2.2 . 4 Fluency
8
v ii
2.3
Guided Dialot:,.rue
9
%.4
Grouping Syst...em
10
CHA P'l'EH 1 I
r
fU
tJlflVRISITU
JDia
IMPROVING STUDENTS' ABILITY IN SPEAKING THROUGH
GUIDED DIALOGUES BY GROUPING SYSTEM
TO THE FIRST YEAR STUDENTS
OF SLTPN 1 BONDOWOSO
REPORT
WRITING
ｾ
Ｍ
ｾ
ＭＮｾｮ＠
s
l.j..?.8 ,1
LILIES SURYANINGSIH
ｎｬｾ＠
: 990210401452
TEACHER TRAINING AND EDUCATION FACULTY
JEMBER UNIVERSITY
2000
MOTTO ·
Where there ls will there is way ( anonym )
il
DEDICATION
Tl1i :; H• ' l>iwl
1.
ｬｾ･＠
Hy l.Jeloved
2. My
My
ｾ＠ J •
f"ly
t f-j Dedi ･［ｴＱ
Ｎ ｾＮＺ､＠
l i Ut-:tJH!t d
be!tJYf!d UIO ｌｴｈｾＡﾷ＠
:L Mv he luii>:!U
4.
i I. i og
ｴｾｯＧＭＢ｝ｉｖｦＺＮｻｊ＠
SOT\
n.J n,;JJW.:1l.f:t·
ｴ Ｎ ｈｾ＠
J ｯｶｾ､＠
t·o ｬ･ｵｾ｜ＮｴＺＡｈ＠
i ij
1'(1
IMPROVING
ABILITY IN SPEAKING THR00GH
ｓｔｕｄｅｎｾ＠
GUIDED DIALOGUES BY GROUPING SYSTEM
TO THK FIRST YKAR STUDENTS
OF SLTPN 1 BONDOWOSO
REPORT WRITING
Presented to
Faculty of Teacher training and Education
Jember University in Partial Fulfillment
of the Requirements for Completing the
Sarjana Program in the Department of
English Education
Name
- LILIES SURYANINGSIH
NIM
- 990210401452
The Level Class · 1999
Depar-t.ment
· Language and Art
Spec ialization
- Knglish. Kd:ucation
Place of Birth
- Bondowoso
Date of Bil:'th
:. August 16 th
Approved by 'l.'he Advisor
iv
1965
APPROVAL SHEET
This
report
writlug
ia appJ'·oved
exminaLio11 commi t.t.ee of Tead1er
Faculty?
and
recleved
Training
by the
and
Education
ed on the 1994 curriculwn, Engllsl1 belongs to the
main :.mbject and still emphasizes on reading abilit.y _
Howover speaking ia ｣ｯｮ｡ｩ､･ｲｾ＠
as one of tl1e important
aub.ject in teaching learning English for coawunication.
TI1er•e in no s p ecial
technique on teacl1ing speaking .for
the rirnL year 3tudents o£ SI.TP, tl1ercfore ttle write.r
conduct-ed t.hls action reaearcll to tl1e first year students
of SL'fP through guided dialogues ｢ｾｲ＠
grouping system in
order to enable tl1ern to express Llleir idea in spoken
language.
The design o£ this research was descriptive qualitative .
The subject. of this research were lC "students' of SLTPN 1
Bondowouo. The teclu1ique that wai; used to collect data
was that the teacl1er implemented the guided dialogues by
grouping ayst.em and observed the .improvement of the first
cycle to the second cycle.
'l'he ｷｲｩｴ･ｾ｡＠
data analysis in the reaseacl1 was done by
､･Ｆｾｲｩ｢ｮｧ＠
the students' ability in expt--ea:;.sing their id€4
in :31:-X>ken language which involved pronunciation,. vocabuｬ｡ｲｹｾ＠
grammar and fluency.
The t'eBul t
al1owed that guided dialogues by gr-ouping
system improve tl1e students ability in speaking with the
average score of ＳｾＴＶ＠
at tl1e end of cycle two.
xi
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
TITI.R
i
Morro
ii
mml CATi ()N
lii
iv
CONSULTANT' S APPROVAL
1\PPHOVAL OF EXAHINKR TRAM
v
1\CKNOWLRDGRHRNT
vi
TABLE OF' CONTKNTE
vii
LIST Oll TABLE
xi
ABSTRACT
CHAPTER I
INTRODUCTION
1. J Background of tlle Research
1
1. 2 Problem of the Researcl1
2
1 . 3 Scope of The Research
2
1 _4 Purpose o.f the Research
3
1.5 S ignificance of the Research
4
CHAP"l'ER II
THEORET I CAL FRAMEWORK
2.1 Speaking Ability
5
£.2 Language Components of Speaking Ability
6
2.2.1 Pronunciation
6
2.2.2 Grammar
7
2.2.3 Vocabulary
8
2.2 . 4 Fluency
8
v ii
2.3
Guided Dialot:,.rue
9
%.4
Grouping Syst...em
10
CHA P'l'EH 1 I
r
fU