Discussion Directory UMM :Data Elmu:jurnal:E:Environmental and Experimental Botany:Vol44.Issue1.Aug2000:

3. Results

By the end of the experimental period, typical visible symptoms of ozone damage i.e. chlorotic mottle were evident on previous years’ C + 1 needles of all trees exposed to ambient levels of urban pollution, and correspond to the mottle illustrated by Gimeno et al. 1992 for P. halepen- sis and Flagler and Chappelka 1995 for Pinus echinata as typical ozone symptoms. The exten- sion and intensity of mottling varied considerably between trees: the number of affected C + 1 needles ranges from 36 to 74 and the mean chlorotic needle surface ranges between 11.5 and 28.6 only symptomatic needles considered and between 4.3 and 6.6 considering all needles. Chlorotic mottling was not associated with insect damage or fungal disease. On the other hand, no visible symptoms were visible on needles from trees maintained in charcoal-Purafil ® -filtered air i.e. ‘control trees’. Fig. 4A – G illustrates the main findings from light microscopy. Primary fluorescence was markedly reduced in symptomatic needles-with effects particularly pronounced around the stom- ata and in the mesophyll cells lining the sub-stom- atal cavity Fig. 4A, B. Several collapsed mesophyll cells were observed in longitudinal cross-sections prepared from symptomatic needles Fig. 4C, and there was evidence of lipid Fig. 4D, E and starch Fig. 4F, G accumulation in mesophyll cells and bundle sheath cells. Fig. 5A – F illustrates some of the ultrastruc- tural modifications observed by TEM in symp- tomatic needles. Fig. 5A and B shows the condition of the chloroplasts. The mesophyll cells of ‘control’ Fig. 5A needles possessed large and elongated chloroplasts; the grana’ were well-orga- nized, while plastoglobuli were few and small arrow. In contrast, their counterparts in symp- tomatic needles Fig. 5B were shorter and rounder, and exhibited electron-dense membranes arrow; plastoglobuli were larger and more abun- dant and appeared not only in the chloroplast, but also in the vacuole. In addition, in symp- tomatic needles the stroma appeared to be granulated. In the cells that make up the bundle sheath Fig. 5C, ‘control’, and Fig. 5D, symptomatic needles a marked difference in the content of lipidic bodies and starch grains was also observed. Both lipids and starch were more abundant in symptomatic needles. Additional features observed in mesophyll cells are illustrated in Fig. 5E – F. Fig. 5E shows a section through the mesophyll of a ‘control needle’, while 5F shows an equivalent part of a symptomatic needle. In symptomatic needles, starch grains were visible in the mesophyll cells Fig. 5F and the vacuoles contained electron- dense material possibly tannins as well as nu- merous lipid bodies Fig. 5F. Symptomatic needles Fig. 6B also exhibited modifications in phloem structure in comparison with ‘control needles’ Fig. 6A, cribrum elements appearing to have collapsed and their lumen flat- tened Fig. 6B. Symptomatic needles also exhib- ited a greater accumulation of calcium oxalate-like crystals in epidermal tissue Fig. 6C, control, and D, symptomatic needle. The ultrastructural alterations described above occur only in the exposed needles and are associ- ated with chlorotic mottle. In the green areas of the exposed needles they are much less evident or absent.

4. Discussion

The appearance of typical visible symptoms of ozone damage chlorotic mottle on the previous C + 1 year needles’ of field-exposed leaves is consistent with the reported effects of controlled exposure to ozone at levels not dissimilar to those recorded in the field in the present study on P. halepensis. Gimeno et al. 1992 found that an average concentration of 70 ppb 7 h day − 1 caused mottle within two months of exposure, whereas Wellburn and Wellburn 1994 stressed the role of episodic peaks up to 120 ppb. Elvira et al. 1995 in an OTC open top chamber experiment ambient air + ozone 40 ppb ob- served chlorotic mottle in the second year of exposure. Finally, Anttonen et al. 1998 found chlorotic mottle after a 5-week ozone treatment Fig. 4. Light micrographs of previous year C + 1 needles from trees exposed to ambient air at the field site and equivalent ‘control trees’ maintained in charcoal-Purafil ® -filtered air May – September. Primary epi-fluorescence in control A and symptomatic B needles observed in transverse sections with blue filter. Arrows indicate weaker red response of chlorophyll in symptomatic needle than in equivalent control needles bar = 100 mm. Collapsed cells in the mesophyll of symptomatic needles stained with neutral red C; bar = 50 mm. Control D and symptomatic E needle sections stained with Fluoral Yellow 088. Arrows indicate greater abundance of lipid deposits in symptomatic needle bar = 100 mm. Control F and symptomatic G needle sections stained with Schiff’s reagent. Arrows indicate the greater starch accumulation in the bundle sheath cells of symptomatic needles bar = 100 mm. Fig. 5. Transmission electron micrographs of previous year C + 1 needles from trees exposed to ambient air at the field site and equivalent ‘control trees’ maintained in charcoal-Purafil ® -filtered air May – September. Chloroplast ultrastructure: fewer plas- toglobuli were evident in control needles A, arrow than in their symptomatic counterparts B, were are more abundant. Arrow indicates the electron-dense membrane bar = 1 mm. Bundle sheath cells: numerous lipid bodies and starch grains were visible in symptomatic needles C with respect to control needles D bar = 5 mm. Vacuole appearance: control needles E exhibited less accumulation of electron-dense tannins than equivalent symptomatic needles F bar = 5 mm. L, lipid; PL, plastoglobuli; ST, starch grain; V, vacuole; T, tannins. Fig. 6. Transmission electron micrographs of previous year C + 1 needles from trees exposed to ambient air at the field site and equivalent ‘control trees’ maintained in charcoal-Purafil ® -filtered air May – September. Phloem in control A and symptomatic B needles-latter samples exhibiting the presence of collapsed cells bar = 2 mm. Epidermal cells in control C and symptomatic needles D. Arrows indicate greater abundance of calcium oxalate-like crystals in symptomatic needles bar = 5 mm. L, lipid; PL, plastoglobuli; ST, starch grain; V, vacuole; T, tannins. with 150 ppb 12 h day − 1 . Different kinds of symptoms tip necrosis, reddening and browning of needles have been reported as acute SO 2 or O 3 injuries Flagler, 1998, for very high levels of these pollutants, but they were not found in this survey. The anatomical observations reported in the present study revealed that chlorotic mottling was associated with the degeneration of mesophyll tissue. Damage appeared primarily in those cells in close proximity to the sub-stomatal cavity-con- sistent with the accepted view that air pollutants are predominantly absorbed through the stomata Wolfenden and Mansfield, 1991. It has been reported in the literature that the mesophyll cells of pine needles are especially sensitive to ozone Evans and Miller, 1972a,b; Miller and Evans, 1974; Evans and Miller, 1975; Evans and Leon- ard, 1991; Evans and Fitzgerald, 1993. Damage to mesophyll was also related to several kinds of pollutants O 3 , SO 2 , NO 2 , alone or in combina- tion Fink, 1989; Hasemann and Wild, 1990; Schiffgens-Gruber and Lu¨tz, 1992, to acid rain treatment Ba¨ck and Huttunen, 1992 andor to forest decline Fink, 1988; Vogelmann and Rock, 1988. Hasemann and Wild 1990 described the so-called ‘bone cells’ as a specific symptom of the injury caused by exposure to a variety of air pollutants. The array of modifications observed at the ultrastructural level in symptomatic needles during the present study are consistent with the observations of Moss et al. 1998 on red spruce P. rubens needles in ozone polluted regions. The physiological relevance of some of the ul- trastructural modifications observed in symp- tomatic needles is particularly worthy of attention. The change in shape and dimension of the chloroplasts, along with the degeneration of the thylakoids and a marked increase in the size and number of plastoglobuli, are amongst the symptoms most frequently associated with ozone- induced damage Sutinen et al., 1990; Anttonen et al., 1994; Holopainen et al., 1996. Granulation of the stroma is considered a specific symptom of ozone damage Sellde´n et al., 1996. On the other hand, swelling of chloroplasts has also been ob- served as SO 2 damage Wellburn et al., 1972. In the present study lipid-like bodies were also ob- served in the vacuole of symptomatic needles. This could be interpreted as an ozone-induced premature ageing response, and is consistent with the observations on ozone-treated needles made by Ka¨renlampi 1986, 1987. Symptomatic needles were also observed to exhibit enhanced starch accumulation in the chloroplasts. This is consis- tent with observations made on the bundle sheath of conifer needles Wellburn and Wellburn, 1994, but contrasts with several authors reports’ of a reduction in the starch content of ozone-treated needles McQuattie and Schier, 1993; Anttonen and Ka¨renlampi, 1995; Holopainen et al., 1996. In the present study, the observed starch accumu- lation in symptomatic needles was consistent with the observed collapse and resulting inactivation of phloem elements-also observed by Wellburn and Wellburn 1994 in ozone-treated needles of P. halepensis. It is possible that this phenomenon is indicative of accelerated needle ageing under the influence of ozone and other pollutants Schmitt and Ruetze, 1990; Fink, 1991a. Starch pattern and allocation, as well as phloem transport, are known to be affected by pollutants Wolfenden and Mansfield, 1991. The alteration of carbon partitioning also causes the unbalance of the shoot – root ratio Grulke and Balduman, 1999. Finally, the extracellular accumulation of cal- cium oxalate crystals in the epidermis cf. Fink, 1991a,b and changes in the behaviour of tannins in the vacuole cf. Ka¨renlampi, 1986, 1987 are also features characteristically associated with the modifications induced by ozone Rosemann et al., 1991; Kangasja¨rvi et al., 1994; Booker et al., 1996.

5. Conclusions