Scope of the Research Definition of Term

8

1.7 Scope of the Research

This research is focused on the pattern of technique that is information gap task in pair and small group. The research was designed for second grade of SMA N1 Seputih Raman. The writer wrote the lesson plans for two weeks in four meetings. The topics of the material were kitchen and crossword which were suitable with the curriculum which covers certain themes to asking and giving information and opinion. The test was oral test and students’ conversation during applying information gap task was recorded. She used random sampling by lottery to choose the class by assuming that all the students in science class have the same ability.

1.8 Definition of Term

The researcher provides definitions of terms in the last part of this chapter in order to avoid misundertanding of concept in this research. a. Speaking is the basic skill in language that enable to utter sound of word and people can share and send their ideas or feelings. Bryne 1998: 8 also says that speaking is a two way process between speaker and listener and involves the productive skill of speaking and the receptive skill of understanding. b. Speaking ability as the ability to use in essentially normal communication, grammatical structure, and vocabulary of the foreign language at normal rate delivery for native speakers of the language. Lado, 1961: 239. c. Information gap task is task that students exchange information in order to complete the information. It is where two students or more work together 9 where each has some parts of the answers to some kind of a problem or a question. They have to explain their part of the information to their partner so that they end up with all the information. Precisely, Information gap activities are those in which students exchange information in order to complete a required task. d. Pair group is the pattern interaction which is working and learning on two to solve the task or problem between two people. e. Small group work is the work which consists of 3 until 5 students in one group in order to solve the problem. f. Comparison is the process of comparing information gap task in pair and small group work in order to find out whether there is a significant difference between them or not in students’ speaking ability.

II. FRAME OF THEORIES

Dokumen yang terkait

The effectiveness of small group learning in speaking ability : (an experiments study at second grade students of Waskito Junior High School Pamulang, Tangerang)

1 10 43

Improving students speaking ability using information gap activities : a claaroom action researreh at-a grade of sma triguna utama ciputat

1 9 91

The Correlation Between Students’ Motivation In Learning Speaking And Their Speaking Ability (A Correlational Study In The Second Grade Of Sma Darussalam Ciputat)

4 35 82

A COMPARATIVE STUDY BETWEEN FIELD-INDEPENDENT AND FIELD-DEPENDENT STUDENTS IN READING COMPREHENSION ACHIEVEMENT AT SECOND GRADE OF SMAN 1 AMBARAWA PRINGSEWU

0 12 49

THE CORRELATION BETWEEN STUDENTS’ SCHEMATA AND THEIR SPEAKING ABILITY AT THE SECOND GRADE OF SMA NEGERI 1 KOTAGAJAH

1 12 52

THE EFFECTS OF INFORMATION GAP TASK IN TEACHING ENGLISH SPEAKING AT THE SECOND YEAR STUDENTS OF SMA YP UNILA BANDAR LAMPUNG

0 9 58

Comparative Study between Power Teaching and Contextual Teaching and Learning (CTL) in Improving Students’ Speaking Ability at Eleven Grade of SMAN 10 Bandar Lampung

0 6 66

A COMPARATIVE STUDY BETWEEN STUDENTS’ FIELD DEPENDENT AND FIELD INDEPENDENT IN READING COMPREHENSION AT THE SECOND GRADE OF MAN 1 LAMPUNG TENGAH

1 10 60

APPLYING THREE TYPES OF INFORMATION GAP TASK IN SPEAKING CLASS AT THE SECOND GRADE OF SMA NEGERI 1 SEPUTIH MATARAM

3 81 57

IMPROVING STUDENTS’ SPEAKING SKILL USING INFORMATION GAP AT SECOND YEAR IMPROVING STUDENTS’ SPEAKING SKILL USING INFORMATION GAP AT SECOND YEAR OF SMP N I NGRAMPAL SRAGEN IN 2010/2011 ACADEMIC YEAR.

0 0 15