Data Analysis on Pre-test and Post-test

pro gress on the students’ achievement. If the pre-test is better then post-test, it means that there is no progress on the students’ achievement. And then the reseracher analyzed the probability result by using SPSS.

3.6.1 Data Analysis on Pre-test and Post-test

3.6.1.1 Normal Distribution Test

The normality test was used to determine whether the data in experimental class are normally distributed. The writer used One-Sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov Formula SPSS 17 to test the normality of the data. In this research, the significant level of 0.05 was used. The hypothesis of normal distribution were: H0: The distribution of the data is normal H1: The distribution of the data in not normal The hypothesis was accepted if the result of normality test is higher than 0.05 sign α. In this case, the researcher used level significance of 0.05. The result of normality test of pre test in experimental class showed that the value of two tailed significance was 0.200 see Appendix 12. It means that H0 was accepted and H1 was rejected since 0.200 0.05. It implied that the distribution of the test was normal. The result of normality test of post test showed that the value of two tailed significance was 0.200 see Appendix 12. Since 0.200 0.05, it could be stated that the data of post test was normally distributed. From the result of normality test above, it can be concluded that the hypothesis was accepted which mean that the data was normally distributed.

3.6.1.2 Paired Sample t-test

After revealing the result of normality, the next statistical computation was analyzing paired sample t-test. Paired sample t-test compares the means of two variables. It computes the difference between the two variable for each case, and test to see if the average difference is significantly different from zero. These are the procedures to follow in calculating paired sample t-test of pre-test and post- test data: 1. Setting the level of significance p at 0.05 and establishing the alternative hypothesis for pre-test and post-test data analysis. The hypotheses were stated as below: Ha : there is significant difference between the means in pre-test and post-test. H0 : there is no significant difference between the means in pre-test and post- test. 2. Analyzing paired sample T-test by using SPSS 17. 3. Comparing t and t table with the level of significance at 0.05 for testing hypothesis and reporting the findings: “Ha is accepted if t -t table with the level of significance at 0.05. From the data in appendix 16, it could be known that t was -9.631. It is negative. It means that the score in pre test was lower than in post test. It also can be seen that t table was 2.034515. It could be known that t -t table or -9.631 -2.034515 and 0.00 0.05. Therefore, for the hypothesis, the null hypothesis was rejected and the reaserach hypothesis was accepted. It meant that there is significant different between the mean of pre-test and the mean of post-test.

3.6.2 Hypothesis Testing

Dokumen yang terkait

IMPROVING THE ABILITY IN WRITING DESCRIPTIVE TEXT THROUGH JUMBLED SENTENCE TECHNIQUE AT SEVENTH GRADE STUDENTS OF MTS NEGERI MENDOYO.

7 89 19

IMPROVING THE TENTH YEAR STUDENTS’ DESCRIPTIVE WRITING ABILITY THROUGH GENRE- BASED APPROACH AT SMA NEGERI 4 JEMBER IN THE 2009/2010 ACADEMIC YEAR

1 57 8

Improving students' writing ability through clustering technique (A classroom action research in the second year of SMP al-hasra Bojongsari- Depok)

4 11 109

THE EFFECT OF OUTLINING STRATEGY IN IMPROVING STUDENTS’ RECOUNT TEXT WRITING ABILITY AT THE SECOND YEAR STUDENTS OF SMPN 13 BANDAR LAMPUNG

3 26 76

IMPROVING STUDENTS’ ABILITY IN WRITING DESCRIPTIVE TEXT THROUGH WORD CLUSTER AT THE SECOND YEAR STUDENTS OF SMA NEGERI 3 METRO

1 11 59

A DESCRIPTIVE STUDY ON STUDENTS ABILITY IN WRITING NARATIVE TEXT AT THE SECOND YEAR OF SMP N 1 TOROH A Descriptive Study On Students Ability In Writing Narative Text At The Second Year Of SMP N 1 Toroh In 2016/2017 Academic Year.

0 2 10

IMPROVING STUDENTS’ ABILITY IN WRITING DESCRIPTIVE TEXT THROUGH GROUP WORK AT THE FIRST YEAR OF SMA N 8 SURAKARTA (CLASSROOM ACTION RESEARCH).

0 0 6

A DESCRIPTIVE STUDY ON THE STUDENTS’ ABILITY IN WRITING NARRATIVE TEXT AT THE SECOND YEAR OF A DESCRIPTIVE STUDY ON THE STUDENTS’ ABILITY IN WRITING NARRATIVE TEXT AT THE SECOND YEAR OF SMA N 1 ANDONG, BOYOLALI.

0 0 14

STUDENTS CAPABILITY IN WRITING DESCRIPTIVE TEXT AT THE SECOND YEAR OF SMA NEGERI 1 PURWODADI IN 2010-2011 STUDENTS CAPABILITY IN WRITING DESCRIPTIVE TEXT AT THE SECOND YEAR OF SMA NEGERI 1 PURWODADI IN 2010-2011 ACADEMIC YEAR.

0 0 13

IMPROVING STUDENTS’ ABILITY IN WRITING A DESCRIPTIVE TEXT THROUGH THINK PAIR SHARE

0 2 10