Carolina Eka Putri, 2014 The Use Of Reflective Essays In Teaching Recount Texts
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
| repository.upi.edu
| perpustakaan.upi.edu
There were three steps to use the test. The first was stating the hypothesis H
=  the  scores  between  experimental  and  control  groups  are  normally distributed  and  setting  the  alpha  level  of  significance  at  0.05  two-tailed  test.
The  second  was  analyzing  the  groups’  scores  using  the  Kolmogorov-Smirnov formula. The last was inferring the output data. If the score is non-significant p
0.05,  it  means  that  the  distribution  of  the  sample  is  significantly  different  from normal  distribution probably  normal.   If the  result is  significant  p 0.05 then
the distribution is not significantly different from normal distribution the sample scores are normally distributed Field, 2005.
3.3.3.2 HOMOGENEITY OF VARIANCE
The  researcher  used  the  Levene’s  test  to  analyze  the  homogeneity  of variance of the scores. This test was aimed at finding out whether or not the data
in the pre-test and post-test scores were homogenous. According to Field 2005, the Levene’s test hypothesis states that the variances in the groups are equal if the
difference  between  the  variances  is  zero.  The  test  was  calculated  by  the computation of SPSS 16.0 for Windows.
There were three steps to use the Levene’s test. The first was stating the hypothesis  H
=  data  between  the  two  groups  are  homogenous  and  setting  the alpha level of significance at 0.05 two-tailed test. The second was analyzing the
groups’ scores using the Levene’s test. The last was inferring the output data. If the  result  of  the  test  is  interpreted  to  be  significant  p
≤ 0.05, it means the null hypothesis  is  incorrect  and  the  variances  are  significantly  difference.  On  the
contrary,  if  the  result  is  interpreted  to  be  non-significant  p0.05,  it  means  the null  hypothesis  is  accepted  and  the  variances  are  approximately  equal  Field,
2005.
3.3.3.3  THE INDEPENDENT T-TEST
The  Independent  t-test  was  used  to  analyze  the  relationship  between  the independent variable treatment and the dependent variable Coolidge, 2000. In
the study, the test was aimed at finding out whether or not there was a difference
Carolina Eka Putri, 2014 The Use Of Reflective Essays In Teaching Recount Texts
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
| repository.upi.edu
| perpustakaan.upi.edu
between the experimental and control groups in terms of the groups’ means on the pre-test and post-test scores. The test was calculated by the computation of SPSS
Statistics 16.0 for Windows. There were three steps to use the independent t-test. The first was stating
the  hypothesis  H =  there  is  no  significant  difference  between  the  students’
writing scores in  the experimental and control group and setting the alpha level of  significance  at  0.05  two-tailed  test.  The  second  was  analyzing  th
e  groups’ scores using the independent t-test. The last was comparing the t
obt
with the level of  significance  for  testing  the  hypothesis  t
crit
.  If  the  t-obtained    t-critical,  it means that the null hypothesis is rejected because there is a significant difference
between experimental and control groups’ scores Field, 2005.
3.3.3.4 THE DEPENDENT T-TEST
Dependent t-test paired sample t-test is used to  analyze and compare the difference  of  means  between  the  scores  of  pre-test  and  post-test  of  each  group
Kranzel   Moursund, 1999.In the study, the dependent  t-test was used  only to the  experimental  group.  It  was  aimed  at  finding  out  whether  or  not  there  was  a
significant  difference  between  the  scores  of  pre-test  and  post-test  of  the experimental group and the effect size of the treatment. The test was calculated by
the computation of SPSS Statistics 16.0 for Windows. There were three steps to use the dependent t-test. The first was stating the
hypothesis  H =  there  is  no  significant  difference  between  the  scores  of  pre-test
and post-test of the experimental group and setting the alpha level of significance at  0.05.  The  second  was  analyzing  the  scores  of  pre-test  and  post-test  of  the
experimental group. The last was comparing the t
obt
with the level of significance for testing the hypothesis t
crit
. If the t-obtained  t-critical, it means that the null hypothesis is rejected because there is a significant difference between the scores
of pre-test and post-test of the experimental groupField, 2005.
Carolina Eka Putri, 2014 The Use Of Reflective Essays In Teaching Recount Texts
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
| repository.upi.edu
| perpustakaan.upi.edu
Table 3. 4 Scale of Effect Size Effect size
r value
Small 0.100
Medium 0.243
Large 0.371
Coolidge, 2000 3.3.4  DATA ANALYSIS ON QUESTIONNAIRE
Questionnaire was administered only to the experimental group to find out students’ responses toward the reflective essay technique. As stated by Arikunto
2010,  questionnaire  consists  of  several  questions  needed  by  the  researcher  to obtain  some  information  from  the  respondents.The  questionnaire  data  were
analyzed based on the frequency of students’ answers. The results were put in the percentage as follow:
Notes: P : Percentage
f0 : Frequency of observed n : Number of samples
Carolina Eka Putri, 2014 The Use Of Reflective Essays In Teaching Recount Texts
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
| repository.upi.edu
| perpustakaan.upi.edu
CHAPTER V CONCLUSIONS AND SUGGESTIONS
This  chapter presents  the conclusions and suggestions from  the results of the study which have been analyzed in the previous chapter.
5.1 CONCLUSIONS
The  study  was  concerned  on  the  use  of  reflective  essays  to  improve students’ scores in writing recount texts. It was conducted to first graders in one
senior high school  in Bandung. There are two main  objectives of the study. The first  was  to  find  out  whether  or  not  the  use  of  reflective  essays  was  effective  in
improving students’ scores in writing recount texts and the second was to find out students’  responses  toward  the  technique.  The  elaboration  of  each  point  is
presented below. First,  the  use  of  reflective  essays
was  effective  in  improving  students’ scores  in  writing  recount  texts.  The  finding  was  supported  by  the  results  of  the
independent  t-test  computation  in  the  post-test  score.  The  mean  score  of  the experimental  group,  which  received  the  reflective  essay  technique,  was  higher
than the mean score of the control group. The result showed that the value of t
obt
was higher than t
crit
4.042  2.000. Moreover, the products of students’ writing of experimental and control groups also showed the differences on some aspects.
The differences can be seen from th e students’ understanding of the organization
of  the  text,  their  choice  of  words  to  represent  something  which  increased  their vocabulary, their creativity in arranging their sentences into coherent paragraphs,
and their ability in using proper grammar to express their idea. Second,  the  questionnaire  that  has  been  distributed  only  to  the
experimental group showed positive response. It was found that most of students put  their  interest  in  the  implementation  of  reflective  essays.  They  agreed  that
writing  reflective  essays  brought  some  benefits  for  them,  especially  in  enriching