Analyzing the Data THE RESULT OF THE STUDY

commit to user 38

C. Analyzing the Data

Based on the result of the analysis above, the researcher made some interpretation as follows: 1. The total frequency of students’ errors is 686 out of 1480 answers. So, the percentage of the students’ errors for all items is 46,3, which can be grouped into 7 language features as follows: No. Language Features Number of Errors Percentage of Total Errors 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. Tense Preposition Agreement Noun Phrase Vocabulary Spelling Capitalization 107 88 112 104 140 40 95 7,22 5,94 7,56 7,02 9,45 2,70 6,41 Total 686 46,3 2. On the table of distribution errors, it is clear that grammar errors and appropriateness errors constitute most errors with the total number of errors 308. It indicates that students have big potential to make both grammar errors and appropriateness errors. commit to user 39 3. From the percentage of students’ errors on each kind of language features of Descriptive text above, it is clear that the students make many errors. The highest number of errors made by the students is vocabulary. The total number of this kind of error is 140 which equals to 9,45 out of the total errors. Agreement follows in second rank with the total number of errors 112 or 7,56. The third rank is tense with 107 errors which equals to 7,22 out of the total error. 4. From the data analysis, the total percentage of students’ errors is 46,3, so that the students’ mastery is 53,7. Based on the category of the passing grade proposed by Arikunto, the result shows that the students’ mastery on the language features of Descriptive text is poor. 5. The Types of Errors The researcher classified errors based on linguistics category Dulay, Burt, and Krashen, 1982: 146. In this study, types of errors are classified into two types, grammar syntax and morphology and lexicon meaning and vocabulary. The highest errors are grammar. The total number of this kind of types of errors is 506 which equals to 74 out of the total number of errors. While lexicon errors constitute a small number of errors than grammar. There are 180 errors which equals to 26 out of the total number of errors. Examples of two types of errors are follows: commit to user 40 1. Grammar · Situation no.1 Thailand or Siam is one of the kingdoms at Asia. Key answer: Thailand or Siam is one of the kingdoms in Asia. Students’ erroneous answer: Thailand or Siam is one of the kingdoms of Asia. · Situation no.12 The boxers were allowed to use hands, knees, legs or even heads to win the game. Key answer: The boxers are allowed to use hands, knees, legs or even heads to win the game. Students’ erroneous answer: The boxers is allowed to use hands, knees, legs or even heads to win the game. · Situation no.6 Thailand is 514 Square-Kilometers. Key answer: Thailand is 514 square-kilometers. Students’ erroneous answer: Thailand is 514 square Kilometers. 2. Lexicon · Situation no. 36 Kwai brige is a historical one because hundreds of Thais and British soldiers died. commit to user 41 Key answer: Kwai bridge is a historical one because hundreds of Thais and British soldiers died. Students’ erroneous answer: Kwai briged is a historical one because hundreds of Thais and British soldiers died. · Situation no.22 Most of the kings are great ones that have success in leading their people and country. Key answer: Most of the kings are great ones that have succeeded in leading their people and country. Students’ erroneous answer: Most of the kings are great ones that have succees in leading their people and country. commit to user 42

CHAPTER V CONCLUSION, IMPLICATION, AND SUGGESTION

Dokumen yang terkait

The Reading Comprehension Ability Of SMA Student (The Case of the second year students SMA Negeri 1 Gebang Langkat Academic Year 2013/2014)

0 41 15

STUDENTS’ ABILITY IN WRITING DESCRIPTIVE TEXT OF THE TENTH GRADE YEAR STUDENTS’ OF SMKN 6 SURAKARTA Students' Ability in Writing Descriptive Text of the Tenth Grade Year Students' of SMKN 6 Surakarta in 2015/2016 Academic Year.

0 5 18

STUDENTS’ ABILITY IN WRITING DESCRIPTIVE TEXT OF THE TENTH GRADE YEAR STUDENTS’ OF SMKN 6 SURAKARTA Students' Ability in Writing Descriptive Text of the Tenth Grade Year Students' of SMKN 6 Surakarta in 2015/2016 Academic Year.

0 3 12

INTRODUCTION Students' Ability in Writing Descriptive Text of the Tenth Grade Year Students' of SMKN 6 Surakarta in 2015/2016 Academic Year.

0 2 4

THE ERRORS ANALYSIS ON WRITING DESCRIPTIVE TEXT MADE BY STUDENTS AT THE7 The Errors Analysis On Writing Descriptive Text Made By Students At The 7th Grade Of SMP Muhammadiyah 5 Surakarta In 2015/2016 Academic Year.

0 3 16

THE ERRORS ANALYSIS ON WRITING DESCRIPTIVE TEXT MADE BY STUDENTS AT THE 7 The Errors Analysis On Writing Descriptive Text Made By Students At The 7th Grade Of SMP Muhammadiyah 5 Surakarta In 2015/2016 Academic Year.

0 4 16

AN ANALYSIS OF DESCRIPTIVE TEXT PRODUCED BY THE SECOND YEAR STUDENTS OF SMA AL-ISLAM 3 SURAKARTA IN 2008-2009 ACADEMIC YEAR.

0 2 7

A DESCRIPTIVE STUDY ON TEACHING READING TO THE FIRST YEAR STUDENTS OF MTsN 1 SURAKARTA IN 2008/2009 ACADEMIC YEAR.

0 1 6

An Analysis of Grammatical Errors in Writing Recount Text by the First Grade Students of SMA Negeri 3 Surakarta in the Academic Year of 2015/2016.

0 0 34

AN ERROR ANALYSIS ON THE USE OF SIMPLE PRESENT TENSE IN DESCRIPTIVE TEXT MADE BY THE FIRST GRADE STUDENTS OF SMA NEGERI 2 BOYOLALI IN THE ACADEMIC YEAR 2014/2015.

0 0 10