It means that there are about 5.56 38.89 - 33.33 = 5.56 of students’
score passed the KKM after learning English by using communication games. On the other hand, there are 14 students finally passed the KKM and the other 22
students are still in lower score.
2. Result of Post Test II
Table 4.3
Students’ Post Test II Score No
Students’ name P
G V
C F
Total Score
Final Score
1 Student A
60 60
55 65
70 310
62 2
Student B 60
65 60
55 65
305 61
3 Student C
80 85
75 75
85 400
80 4
Student D 70
80 75
75 80
380 76
5 Student E
65 75
65 65
75 345
69 6
Student F 70
70 65
65 65
335 67
7 Student G
65 75
65 60
75 340
68 8
Student H 65
70 65
60 75
335 67
9 Student I
75 70
60 50
65 320
64 10 Student J
65 60
50 60
65 300
60 11 Student K
65 75
50 50
65 305
61 12 Student L
70 75
75 60
75 355
71 13 Student M
65 65
60 60
60 310
62 14 Student N
60 70
70 55
60 315
63 15 Student O
55 65
60 60
70 310
62 16 Student P
75 80
70 75
75 375
75 17 Student Q
55 65
55 60
70 305
61 18 Student R
65 70
65 70
75 345
69 19 Student S
50 60
60 65
70 305
61 20 Student T
40 55
45 45
65 250
50 21 Student U
35 50
40 45
55 225
45 22 Student V
70 70
65 75
75 355
71 23 Student W
55 70
65 55
65 310
62 24 Student X
35 35
30 35
50 185
37 25 Student Y
65 65
50 70
75 325
65 26 Student Z
70 65
65 60
70 330
66 27 Student AA
60 65
65 60
70 320
64 28 Student AB
45 40
45 45
65 240
48 29 Student AC
55 55
60 65
65 300
60
30 Student AD 60
65 60
65 75
325 65
31 Student AE 65
70 55
50 75
315 63
32 Student AF 50
35 35
35 55
210 42
33 Student AG 55
65 65
50 65
300 60
34 Student AH 65
70 65
75 80
355 71
35 Student AI 55
65 60
65 65
310 62
36 StudentAJ 65
70 55
65 75
330 66
Student who does not pass the KKM Explanation:
P : Pronunciation
G : Grammar
V : Vocabulary
C : Comprehension
F : Fluency
60 : Criterion Minimum of Completeness KKM
Based on the data above, it can be interpreted that the average of students’
post-test II scores was: ∑ Post Test II = 2256
∑ x Post Test II
= ___ N
= 2256 36
= 62.66
From this data , the writer calculates students’ post test 1 score with
students’ post test II score by using this formula below to find the improvement of students score in the form of percentage, it will be as follow:
P = y2
– y x 100 y
P = 62.66
– 50.66 x 100 50.66
P = 12 x 100
50.66 P
= 23.68
After finding the improvement of students’ score, then the writer tried to find the class percentag
e of the whole students’ who able to pass the KKM as follow:
P = __F__ x 100
N P
= 31_ x 100 36
= 86.11
It is meant that about 7.69 62.66 – 54.97 = 7.69 students’ score
averages are increased. It is improved from the previous cycle which is only improved 4.31 points. It showed that the implementation of communication games
in teaching English especially teaching speaking are successful. From those interpretations, the writer obtained that there are 47.22
86.11 – 38.89 = 47.22 of students score had improved within the second cycle,
or 31 of 36 students are passed the KKM while the other 5 students are still bellow the KKM.
If it is calculated the whole improvement of students score from the pre test result, it would be 52.78 of students score are passed the KKM. Or 12
students are better after learning by using games. In this case, those scores showed the successful of the classroom action research toward students of first grade of
Manaratul Islam Islamic Junior High School. Throughout these scores are derived not only within the tests that carried
out to know students’ progress but also it derived from students’ English development during the research even oral or written. So that the researcher is not
only value the final result of the research but also the process itself. As revealed by Finocchiaro and Brumfit concerning with the Communicative Language
Teaching for the beginning Level
5
. Furthermore, the main problem is just matter
5
Jack C. Richards and Theodore S. Rodgers, Approaches and Methods in Language Teaching, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1986, p. 81
of habit to practice; the more students have opportunities to practice the better they will be.
Table 4.4
Students’ speaking score pre test, post test I, and post test II
No Students’ Name
Pre Test Post Test I
Post Test II
1 Student A
48 51
62 2
Student B 42
45 61
3 Student C
71 75
80 4
Student D 71
73 76
5 Student E
48
65 69
6 Student F
42
52 67
7 Student G
71
62 68
8 Student H
71
64 67
9 Student I
62
54 64
10 Student J
48
51 60
11 Student K
54
50 61
12 Student L
66
70 71
13 Student M
54
55 62
14 Student N
38
58 63
15 Student O
32
41 62
16 Student P
66
71 75
17 Student Q
52
43 61
18 Student R
54
68 69
19 Student S
32
56 61
20 Student T
69
43 50
21 Student U
34
43 45
22 Student V
67
71 71
23 Student W
54
42 62
24 Student X
36
33 37
25 Student Y
28
64 65
26 Student Z
73
63 66
27 Student AA
42
60 64
28 Student AB
33
30 48
29 Student AC
64
56 60
30 Student AD
62
65 65
31 Student AE
59
42 63
32 Student AF
30
40 42
33 Student AG
54
52 60
34 Student AH
62
67 71
35 Student AI
42
45 62
36 StudentAJ
29
59 66
Total Score 1824
1979 2256
Students’ scores’ mean M =
∑x N
50.66
54.97 62.66
Students’ score class percentage P = _F_ x 100
N
33.33
38.89 86.11
Student who does not pass the KKM
Figure 4.2
Students’ Score mean improvement
Figure 4.3
Students’ score class percentage per test pre test, post test I, post II
10 20
30 40
50 60
70
Students score
average Pre test
Post test I Post test II
10 20
30 40
50 60
70 80
90
Students score
percentage Pre test
Post test I Post Test II
3. The Result of Post Interview
