RESEARCH METHODS 3.1. RESEARCH RESULT AND DISCUSSION 4.1. CONCLUSIONS AND SUGGESTIONS 5.1.

CHAPTER IV RESEARCH RESULT AND DISCUSSION 4.1.

Research Result 50 4.1.1. Pretest Score of Student in Experiment and Control Class 52 4.1.2. Post-test Score of Student in Experiment and Control Clas 53 4.2. Validity test 54 4.2. Data Analysis 54 4.2.1. Normality Test 54 4.2.2. Homogenety Test 55 4.3. Hypothesis Test 55 4.4. Discussion 56

CHAPTER V CONCLUSIONS AND SUGGESTIONS 5.1.

Conclusion 60 5.2. Suggestion 61 REFERENCE APPENDIX LIST OF TABEL Tabel 2.2. Syntax of Advance Organizer Learning Model 15 Tabel 3.4. Two Group Pretest – Postest Design 39 Tabel 4.1 Pretest Score and Post Test Score in Experiment Class Control Class 50 Tabel 4.1. Diagram Pretest Score Data in Expermiment Class and Control Class 51 Tabel 4.1. Diagram Postest Score data in Experiment Class and Control Class 51 Tabel4.2. Normality test of Experiment and Control Class 52 Tabel 4.2. Homogenety Test of pre test data 52 Tabel 4.3. t-Test summary 53 LIST OF APPENDIX Appendix 1 Lesson Plan Control 1 58 Appendix 2 Lesson Plan Control 2 66 Appendix 3 Lesson Plan Control 3 72 Appendix 4 Lesson Plan Experiment 1 82 Appendix 5 Lesson Plan Experiment 2 93 Appendix 6 Lesson Plan Experiment 3 100 Appendix 7 Student Worksheet 1 113 Appendix 8 Student Worksheet 2 117 Appendix 9 Student Worksheet 3 121 Appendix 10 Test Base on Revised Bloom’s Taxonomy 125 Appendix 11 Test 139 Appendix 12 Pre test and Post test Data in Experiment Class 146 Appendix 13 Pre test and Post test Data in Control Class 147 Appendix 14 Calculation of Average Score and Deviation Standard of Pre test and Post test in Experiment and Control 148 Appendix 15 Normality Test 151 Appendix 16 Homogeneity Test 155 Appendix 17 Hypothesis Test 157 1

CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION

1.1 Background

Progress of a nation is determined by the quality of human resources. The quality of human resources is dependent on the quality of education. Education plays an important role in the development of the nation because of education as a way to educate the nation. The success of development in the field of education will greatly influence the development in other areas. Therefore, the development in the field of education implemented.Human resource potential is needed to be able to educate education such as the development of science and technology.One of knowledge that must be possessed to anticipate the development of science and technology is the science of physics. Therefore, physics is placed as one of the subjects that are important because one of the requirements mastery of science and technology related to natural science which includes physics. Physics is part of the natural sciences, which is essentially the search for understanding of natural phenomena and phenomena that occur in it. More simply it can be said to be closely related to the physics of everyday life. Based on field work conducted in SMAN 1 Tebing Tinggi, found that many students who misunderstood the physical sciences. Teachers teach physics to form calculations without using concepts, so students often assume that physics is only filled with formula ’s that elusive cause of student participation in learning physics is low. At the time of observation, researchers looked at the list of student scores list last year that the results of class X student of the subjects of physics approximately 70 of the 40 students worth 65 down in 20112012, this means the average value of the KKM not meet the 65 . When asked the teacher of physics, the value of the result is remedial. From this it is clear that the student wishes to follow the teaching of physics is still low. Based on interviews with one of teacher of physics class X SMA Negeri 1 Tebing Tinggi , found that low student learning outcomes in the study of physics due to impress learning center teacher to make the atmosphere of learning to be monotonous. The learning process is still centered teachers tend to make classroom learning environment becomes rigid because the communication that exists only in one direction only. One of them is the cause of his lack of instructional media that teachers so that teachers are less variable in explaining.The learning process which is always centered on the teachers make learning becomes passive, sleepy, unpleasant, boring and even sometimes students want a quick lesson ends. During the teachers still teach physics with a lecture and only emphasize the formula it will create interest and motivation of students to learn the lesson will be low, so that the study results will be low as well. Based on the results of preliminary studies conducted in SMAN 1 Tebing Tinggi class X by distributing questionnaires to students, data showed that of the 38 students, 40 said that physics is difficult and less attractive, 60 said that physics is mediocre, while the activities teaching and learning physics, 50 want to learn while playing and 35 want the lab and demonstration. The reason students say this because during this study only explain the physics of matter and formulas, students record and then work on the problems, which makes students less enjoys physics lesson.One of the governments efforts to improve Indonesian education is to establish educational unit level curriculum. Curriculum development unit level needs to be supported by a conducive learning environment for the creation of an atmosphere that is safe, comfortable and orderly, so that the learning process can take place with fun enjoyable learning. A climate will lead to more emphasis on the learning process of learning to know, learning at work learning to do, a self-learning learning to be, and learn to live together. The atmosphere will accumulate independence and less dependency among the school community, are adatif, and proactive and have an entrepreneurial spirit high resilient, innovative, and risk-taking,, not only for students, but also teachers and leaders Mulyasa 2006 : 33.

Dokumen yang terkait

THE EFFECT OF ROUNDTABLE MODEL IN COOPERATIVE LEARNING ON THE WRITING ACHIEVEMENT OF THE SECOND YEAR STUDENTS OF SMAN 1 ARJASA IN THE 2005 / 2006 ACADEMIC YEAR

0 4 92

THE EFFECT OF TEACHING ENGLISH THROUGH GAMES ON VOCABULARY ACHIEVEMENT OF THE SECOND YEAR STUDENTS OF SLTPN 1 ARJASA JEMBER IN THE ACADEMIC YEAR OF 2002-2003

0 3 50

THE EFFECT OF THINK PAIR SHARE (TPS) MODEL ON SPEAKING ACHIEVEMENT OF THE ELEVENTH YEAR STUDENTS OF SMA NEGERI I RAMBIPUJI JEMBER IN THE 2010/2011 ACADEMIC YEAR

0 3 13

THE EFFECT OF THINK PAIR SHARE (TPS) MODEL ON SPEAKING ACHIEVEMENT OF THE ELEVENTH YEAR STUDENTS OF SMA NEGERI I RAMBIPUJI JEMBER IN THE 2010/2011 ACADEMIC YEAR

0 3 13

THE EFFECT OF THINK PAIR SHARE (TPS) MODEL ON SPEAKING ACHIEVEMENT OF THE ELEVENTH YEAR STUDENTS OF SMA NEGERI I RAMBIPUJI JEMBER IN THE 2010/2011 ACADEMIC YEAR

0 3 13

THE EFFECT OF USING COMPUTER ASSISTED LANGUAGE LEARNING ON THE ELEVENTH GRADE STUDENTS’ WRITING ACHIEVEMENT OF MAN JEMBER 1 IN THE 2010/2011 ACADEMIC YEAR

0 2 13

THE EFFECT OF USING MIND MAPPING TECHNIQUE ON THE ELEVENTH GRADE STUDENTS’ WRITING ACHIEVEMENT AT SMAN 1 GLENMORE IN THE 2012/2013 ACADEMIC YEAR GLENMORE IN THE 2012/2013 ACADEMIC YEAR

0 4 13

THE EFFECT OF USING ROUNDTABLE TECHNIQUE IN COOPERATIVE LANGUAGE LEARNING ON TENSE ACHIEVEMENT OF THE EIGHTH YEAR STUDENTS AT SMPN 1 JENGGAWAH IN THE 2012/2013 ACADEMIC YEAR YEAR STUDENTS AT SMPN 1 JENGGAWAH IN THE 2012/2013 ACADEMIC YEAR YEAR STUDENTS AT

0 4 16

THE EFFECT OF USING STUDENT TEAMS-ACHIEVEMENT DIVISIONS STRUCTURE ACHIEVEMENT AT MAN 1 JEMBER IN THE 2012/2013 ACADEMIC YEAR

0 3 16

THE EFFECT OF COOPERATIVE SCRIPT LEARNING MODEL ON BIOLOGY STUDENTS’ ACHIEVEMENT IN CLASS VII SMP 11 MANOKWARI

0 0 11