Cooperation between the IHO, ISOTC 211 and the OGC

2.4 Cooperation between the IHO, ISOTC 211 and the OGC

The OGC and the IHO are category A liaisons of ISOTC 211. Category A liaisons are organizations that make an effective contribution to the work of the technical committee for questions dealt with by the technical committee. Such organizations are given access to all relevant documentation and are invited to meetings. They may nominate experts to participate on the development of standards in working groups ISOIEC Directives, Part 1 2012. The OGC and ISOTC 211 have a long history of collaboration and development of joint standards documents, the submission of OGC standards to ISOTC 211 for consideration for approval as International Standards, and the use of ISOTC 211 developed standards as part of the OGC Abstract Specification, the conceptual foundation for most OGC specification development activities. Open interfaces and protocols are built and referenced against the Abstract Specification, thus enabling interoperability between different brands and different kinds of spatial processing systems. OGC develops standards that can be directly implemented. Many of these implementation standards are based on the conceptual or abstract models defined by ISO or jointly by the OGC and ISO. Therefore, the OGC maintains a Class A Liaison relationship with ISOTC 211. The terms of the agreement 11 are: - The OGC wishes to obtain ISO International Standard status for its Industry Implementation Standards. - ISOTC 211 wishes to adopt appropriate Industry Implementation Specifications as ISO International Standards or other ISO deliverables. - The OGC wishes, while retaining its market responsiveness, to align with ISOTC 211 on working practices. - ISOTC 211 wishes, within the constraints of the ISO Directives, to co-operate with OGC in assisting the alignment of life cycle working practices. - The OGC and ISOTC 211 wish to harmonize and agree their respective work programmes and to set up a group to handle issues under this agreement. - The OGC and ISOTC 211 wish to achieve mutual benefit from sharing the expertise of domain experts of the two organisations and they welcome cross-project participation. The current OGC standards baseline and their relationship to the ISO 19100 series of standards is documented in the OGC Reference Model ORM. The OGC Reference Model ORM describes the OGC Standards Baseline focusing on relationships between the baseline documents. The OGC Standards Baseline SB consists of the approved OGC Abstract and Implementation Standards Interface, Encoding, Profile, and Application Schema – normative documents and OGC Best Practice documents informative documents. The cooperation between IHO and ISOTC 211 has been driven by the development of standards for digital hydrographic information and products. The IHO recognized the benefits of developing standards based on some or all of the parts of the ISO 19100 series or other related standards and both organizations agreed to formalize their cooperation through a Memorandum of Understanding 12 in order to strengthen the joint development of international standards and to avoid duplication of work on standards related to hydrography and nautical charting and related data, products and services. As a category A liaison organization to ISOTC 211, IHO members, IHO technical staff, and IHO nominated experts attend ISOTC 211 working groups and plenary meetings and participate in the work in a non-voting capacity. IHO liaison to ISOTC 211 provides overall co-ordination of this activity within IHO. As an accredited Non Governmental International Organization, ISOTC 211 representatives participate as non-voting liaison members in the IHO committees and working groups so that reciprocal liaison is achieved. Reports on the work of the IHO are given at each relevant ISOTC 211 plenary or working group meeting; reciprocally, and conversely, reports on the work of ISOTC 211 are given at each relevant IHO meeting. http:www.isotc .orgAgreementsAgreement_OGC.pdf http:www.iho.intmtg_docsnternational_OrganizationsMOUOSO.pdf

3. Summary of the analysis