Jones et al., J. Catal., 259, 147, 2008 G. Wang et al., Surf. Sci. 601, 1271, 2007 Sehested, Catal. Today, 111, 103, 2006 F. Abild-Pedersen et al., Surf. Sci, 590, 127, 2005

Mechanism of SRM TOF s -1 T= 773 K; P = 1 atm; CH 4 conversion 10 • Experiment show that TOF decreases in the order Ru ~ Rh Ni ~ Ir ~ Pt ~ Pd • Theory shows that TOF decreases in the order Ru Rh Ni Ir Pt ~ Pd

G. Jones et al., J. Catal., 259, 147, 2008

CH 4g + H 2 O g ⇋ CO g + 3 H 2g E. D. German, M. Sheintuch, J. Phys. Chem. C, 107, 10229, 2013 Relationship of TOF s -1 and H and CH 3 binding energies for T = 500 K • TOF for CH 4 dissociation decrease in the order Rh Ru ~ Ir Ni ~ Pd ~ Pt • For Ni111, CO is formed from CHO Dissociation of CH to C and H is disfavored on Ni111

S. G. Wang et al., Surf. Sci. 601, 1271, 2007

Ni111 CH 4g + CO 2g ⇋ 2 CO g + 2 H 2g 4 Kinetics for the steam reforming of CH 4 at 873 K on Ni MgO

j. Wei and E. Igelsia, J. Catal., 224, 370, 2004

CH 4g + H 2 O g ⇋ CO g + 3 H 2g 4 Kinetics for the dry reforming of CH 4 at 873 K on Ni MgO CH 4g + CO 2g ⇋ 2 CO g + 2 H 2g 4 Kinetics for the dry reforming of CH 4 at 873 K on Ni MgO • The kinetics for the forward reaction in steam and dry reforming are identical 4 R f = k f P CH4 • The rate expression of steam and dry reforming and for CH 4 decomposition on Ni are the same • The rate coefficient for all three reactions is the same • The process controlling all three reactions is the dissociative adsorption of CH 4 Ni MgO Steam and Dry Reforming of CH 4 • The kinetics of carbon accumulation are the same for steam and dry reforming of CH 4 on Coke Deposition on Ni CH 4g → CH 3s + H s • CH 4 dissociative adsorption occurs preferentially at Ni211 steps • Graphene sheets nucleate at Ni211 steps and then grow over the nanoparticle

J. Sehested, Catal. Today, 111, 103, 2006 F. Abild-Pedersen et al., Surf. Sci, 590, 127, 2005

1. Nørskov and coworkers, J. Phys. Chem C, 114, 2010

Energy-driven Carbon Growth 1 : ΔG = total free energy change for a graphene island N tot = total atoms in graphene island Δμ C = carbon chemical potential E edge = energyC atom on edge of island E stretch = energy cost for stretching graphene layer to match Pt lattice Lattice mismatch strain cost Surface cost Graphene growth Bulk energy Step edge Graphene nucleus ∆� = −� ��� ∆� � + 3 �� ��� � ���� + 2 �� ��� � ������ • Graphene growth nucleates at steps • To nucleate the step width has to be greater than a critical value Ni NiAu • Introduction of Au into Ni introduces additional strain and raises N tot required to nucleate the growth of graphene Ni Bulk Energy Edge Energy Strain Energy ∆� = −� ��� ∆� � + 3 �� ��� � ���� + 2 �� ��� � ������ E st ra in e V ato m Au

1. Nørskov and coworkers, J. Phys. Chem C, 114, 2010

• Thermodynamics predicts that the preferred products should be Cs C 6 H 6g C 2 H 4g • Carbon deposition along with C 6 H 6 and C 2 H 4 is observed for MoC x ZSM-5, FeSiO 2 • Only FeSiO 2 produces ethene, benzene, and naphthalene but not coke • A CH 4 conversion of 48 is achieved at 1363 K and a space velocity of 21,400 mlg h FeSiO 2

X. Bao and coworkers, Science, 344, 616, 2014

2 • CH 4 pyrolysis at 1363 K over FeSiO 2 achieves 48 conversion and selectivity of 48.4 to C 2 H 4 and the rest to benzene and naphthalene • FeSiO 2 is stable to for 60 h • The high stability is attributed to isolated FeC 2 sites 2 • Graphite is the thermodynamically preferred product of methane pyrolysis • The absence of soot or coke is attributable to the very rapid quenching of the product gases, which inhibits the kinetics of soot formation • Coke is not formed on FeSiO 2 because the sites are too small to nucleate coke Active site for FeSiO 2

X. Bao and coworkers, Sci., 344, 616, 2014

• The active center is taken to be a [Cu 2 µ-O 2 ] 2+ core based on UV-Vis observations and comparison with compounds of known structure • CH 4 is activated on [Cu 2 µ-O 2 ] 2+ cores to produce CH 3 O species that can then be hydrolyzed to form CH 3 OH • Catalyst reactivation in O 2 at elevated temperature is required CH 4 + [Cu 2 µ-O 2 ] 2+ [Cu 2 CH 3 OOH] 2+ [Cu 2 CH 3 OOH] 2+ + H 2 O [Cu 2 µ-OH 2 ] 2+ + CH 3 OH [Cu 2 µ-OH 2 ] 2+ [Cu 2 µ-O 2 ] 2+ + H 2 O CH 4g + ½ O 2g ⇋ CH 3 OH g

M. H. Groothaert et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 127, 1394 2005