Needs and challenges Directory UMM :Data Elmu:jurnal:A:Applied Soil Ecology:Vol15.Issue1.Agust2000:

M.M. Wander, L.E. Drinkwater Applied Soil Ecology 15 2000 61–73 69 in a way that is meaningful to producers. Several of the previously discussed on-farm projects have indi- cated that SOM and SOM-dependent properties may be attractive indicators of sustainability because they are responsive to management practices. Soil organic matter and several associated physical and biologi- cal properties are equated with soil quality because of their positive influence on soil performance Gregorich et al., 1994; Karlen and Cambardella, 1996; Herrick and Wander, 1997. Additionally, the positive or neg- ative effects of management practices on SOM levels are relatively well understood; this makes it possible for producers to identify practices that will improve or degrade soil quality over time. Many on-going soil quality efforts emphasize SOM and its relationship to management. There have been efforts to develop educational materials about organic matter fractions and SOM-dependent properties. Table 3 lists a number of activities and demonstrations that have been used successfully in workshops for farmers and extension agents. These types of activities, some of which origi- nated as a component of soil health kits, bring obscure mechanisms such as aggregate stability to life. Materials or demonstrations that emphasize the composition of soil and SOM as understood by scien- tists have little utility unless they provide practical in- formation. Accordingly, information targeting farmers has tended to emphasize SOM contributions to crop productivity and yield stability Table 2: Approach IV. Many researchers have responded to producer in- terest by developing educational materials that relate management practices to consequences for SOM. Ide- ally, materials should emphasize components that can be managed within a reasonable timeframe. Both the biologically-active and slowly-cycling organic matter pools, which are predicted to have half lives ranging from days or weeks active to decades slow, are significant to scientists and farmers interested in soil quality. Active fractions influence nutrient cycling, biological activity and biologically mediated soil physical properties while passive or slowly-cycling fractions contribute to soil physical condition and habitat quality. Particulate organic matter is a com- ponent of SOM that has been identified as a partic- ularly promising index of organic matter status and its contributions to soil andor organic matter quality Gregorich et al., 1994; Wander et al., 1994; Sikora et al., 1996. This measure is attractive because it’s half-life, which is a decade or so, equals the amount of time that an individual would farm a parcel of land. Additionally, POM, which can be obtained by a variety of techniques including some easily per- formed in a demonstration setting Table 3, can be positively correlated with biologically-active fractions and aggregation. Accordingly, POM is an index of stewardship, recording the cost or contributions of management to soil quality. In order to convince producers that SOM manage- ment is truly a worthwhile endeavor, SOM and its con- tributions to productivity and environmental function must be demystified. Procedures to compare soils with different SOM levels or with different management histories Table 3 have been devised to demonstrate the impacts of SOM on aggregate stability, soil water relations, and plant growth. Many demonstrations em- phasize impacts on soil biota that are assumed but not always known to be positively and consistently corre- lated with soil functions. Research establishing defini- tive relationships between management, SOM and, for example, microbial metabolism is badly needed and in demand by producers.

3. Needs and challenges

Soil quality efforts have thus far been focused largely on the development and assessment of tools for use on-farm or to be delivered in a soil-testing format. By emphasizing the production of data or technical tools to be used on-farm, researchers developing soil quality information have worked in a context where short-term considerations are most pressing. Tools that will be adopted by farmers must produce data relevant to producer’s priorities, which necessarily reflect current economic pressures and therefore re- volve around yields and short-term profitability. But, if taken too far, this approach to information develop- ment and delivery will reduce soil quality to a mere synonym of soil productivity. By focusing on the au- thority individual farmers have over soil management decisions, soil quality efforts imply farmers are solely responsible for maintaining soil condition. Farmers are in effect being asked to subsidize sustainability. Few farmers believe they can afford to include the value of soil as a resource or long-term sustainability as immediate goals of their farming practices. This 70 M.M. Wander, L.E. Drinkwater Applied Soil Ecology 15 2000 61–73 Table 4 Minimum data set reflecting scale of information application a Biological Chemical Physical Field, farm, watershed indicators Crop yield, appearance, NPP Soil organic matter Soil thickness, morphology Weed pressure pH Infiltration Crop nutrient deficiency Nutrient availability Runoff Earthworms Conductivity Sediment fans Canopy Losses Ease of tillage Soil structure Regional or national indicators Productivity, yield stability Organic matter trends Desertification Diversity and food web relations Acidification Cover Biomass density and abundance Salinization Erosion Water quality Siltation of rivers and lakes Air quality a Karlen et al. 1997. is an example of what Lee 1993 refers to as a mis- match in the scale of human responsibility. Unless producers and the public, who both benefit from the environmental services performed by soils, pay the full cost of soil exploitation, economic exhaustion of the resource will result. This problem is well known. An USDA special publication, Soils and Men, pub- lished in 1938 acknowledged, “there are both private and public purposes in the use of soil. It is widely ac- knowledged today that public purposes are not being achieved satisfactorily” USDA, 1938. Unfortunately, the public has little appreciation for the additive benefits of soil building practices that are derived through their indirect contributions to ecosys- tem services. Connections between management prac- tices and the productivity of a farm field, the quality of water in a lake, and the amount of carbon sequestered by an ecosystem are frequently made. Because the physical or temporal scale of these linkages vary, the cause and effect relationships between management practices and these soil-dependent phenomena are typically considered separately. Even when the pub- lic is aware, the diffuse rewards of stewardship may not be pressing enough for those rewards to motivate policy. Agricultural policy decisions tend to be made in relation to perceived political problems rather than as the result of efforts to maximize social welfare Bates, 1998. There is a soil risk-based assessment of soil quality based on soil erosion and salinization in the agricultural and environmental policy framework developed by the Organization for Economic Coop- eration and Development OECD and its 29 member countries Parris, 1999. That framework will use indicators to translate environmental problems into policy. That policy may be able to reduce soil degra- dation but will have little capacity to enhance soil quality or the environmental and productive efficiency associated with its optimization. Our ability to derive the benefits from appropriate field-, watershed- or municipal-scale soil building practices will depend upon the approaches to research, education, and policy we employ. The techniques used will logically vary depending upon the scale of interest Halvorson et al., 1997. Recognizing this, Karlen et al. 1997 specified MDS components for use at different physical and decision-making scales Table 4. Efforts reviewed in this document include positive examples of methods that might be combined to formalize a process for research and education that could promote soil quality as a means to achieve sus- tainable farming systems. Bouma 1997 advocated the establishment of ‘research chains’ where inter- disciplinary analysis would identify basic research needs. The results of appropriately targeted basic work would then be communicated to, and analyzed by, a diverse team that would integrate the information into practice. That strategy would be compatible with an US extension tradition that has emphasized the diffusion of useful and practical information. It may not, however, adequately educate or prepare those M.M. Wander, L.E. Drinkwater Applied Soil Ecology 15 2000 61–73 71 involved in agriculture to problem solve in a com- plex and rapidly changing environment. According to Ikerd 1988, the challenges of the 21st century will force cooperative extension to switch its emphasis from the use of practical information to the education of those involved in agriculture. Participatory aspects of some of the projects cited here could be developed to facilitate relationships between scientists, farmers and members of public and private organizations. The education derived from these interactions will help farmers, community members, political repre- sentatives and scientists determine when and how to effectively promote and reward soil stewardship.

4. Summary