A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF STUDENTS’ VOCABULARY ACHIEVEMENT TAUGHT THROUGH WORD MAPPING TECHNIQUE AND MEMORIZING GAME TECHNIQUE AT THE SECOND YEAR OF SMPN 4 BANDAR LAMPUNG

  

ABSTRACT

A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF STUDENTS’ VOCABULARY

ACHIEVEMENT TAUGHT THROUGH WORD MAPPING TECHNIQUE

AND MEMORIZING GAME TECHNIQUE AT THE SECOND YEAR OF

SMPN 4 BANDAR LAMPUNG

  

By

Nuryanti

  Based on the Educational Unit Level Curriculum 2006 in teaching English for junior high school students, there are four skills that the students should master, they are listening, speaking, reading and writing. In order to communicate well in English, students should be provided with one of the elements of language, that is vocabulary. Vocabulary plays an important role in learning a foreign language, It is the element that links those four language skills all together. Therefore, English teachers should be able to find their best way to teach vocabulary.

  This study was conducted to find out whether there was a significant difference of vocabulary achievement of students who were taught through word mapping technique and those taught through memorizing game technique. In doing so, the researcher used intact group pretest-posttest design suggested by Hatch and Farhady (1982) which deal with two classes. Two classes used in this research were class 8B as experimental class 1 which was taught through word mapping technique and class 8C as experimental class 2 which was taught using memorizing game technique. These two classes were taken from second grade of SMPN 4 Bandar Lampung, academic year 2009/2010. The result of the research shows that there is a significant difference of vocabulary achievement of students taught through word mapping and taught through memorizing game technique. The hypothesis test shows the value of two tail significance was

   = 0.000 while the condition to accept the hypothesis was  lower than 0.05. In addition, word mapping gave result of students’ vocabulary

I. INTRODUCTION

  This chapter discusses about the basic problem of the research. It consists of background of the problem, formulation of the problem, objective of the research, the uses of the research and scope of the research.

A. Background of the Problem

  Based on the Educational Unit Level Curriculum 2006 in teaching English for junior high school students, there are four skills that the students should master; they are listening, speaking, reading and writing. In order to communicate well in English, students should be provided with one of the elements of language, that is vocabulary. Vocabulary plays an important role in learning a foreign language. It is the element that links the four language skills: listening, speaking, reading and writing all together. Vocabulary is considered to be important as it is hoped that the larger number of vocabulary acquired by the students the bigger chance for success in learning a foreign language will be achieved. It can be said that learning a language cannot be separated from learning its vocabulary, as Tarigan (1986:2) says that the quality of one’s language depends upon the quality and the quantity of his or her knowledge of vocabulary.

  Even though students realize the importance of vocabulary when learning a foreign language, most of junior high school students learn vocabulary passively due to several factors. According to Huyen (2003) the factors are: first, they consider the teacher's explanation for meaning or definition, pronunciation, spelling and grammatical functions as a boring thing. In this case, language learners have nothing to do in a vocabulary learning section but to listen to their teacher. Second, students only think of vocabulary learning as knowing the primary meaning of new words. Therefore, they ignore all other functions of the words. Third, students usually only acquire new vocabulary through new words in their textbooks or when given by teachers during classroom lessons. For example, learners find many new words in a text and then ask the teacher to explain the meanings and usages. Forth, many learners do not want to take risks in applying what they have learnt. Students may recognize a word in a written or spoken form and think that they already "know the word", but they may not be able to use that word properly in different contexts or pronounce it correctly. Regarding the several factors above, teacher must arouse the students’ interest in learning vocabulary by providing a good model of teaching and make them feel enjoy in learning vocabulary.

  As the writer’s experience when conducting her teaching practice at SMP Negeri 4 Bandar Lampung in February to April 2009, she found that most of students in this school had difficulties in learning English because of their inability in vocabulary, such as: the lack of vocabulary, did not understand the meaning of the word itself and the meaning of the word in a context. This might be a justification that it is necessary to find and fun for the students. For that reason, the writer chose SMP Negeri 4 Bandar Lampung as her population of the research.

  Although vocabulary has been the subject of many studies, few researches have revealed the effective techniques of vocabulary teaching (Akbari: 2008). So it is of prime importance to attempt to find more effective technique of vocabulary teaching. Therefore in this research, the writer would like to apply and to compare two different kinds of techniques: memorizing game technique and word mapping technique. Memorizing game is a technique which requires the students to memorize some words based on the sentence made by adding one item related to the previous item (Agoestyowati: 2008). This game enables the students to augment their vocabulary since they should add the related words to the word given.

  While word mapping (Schwartz & Raphael: 1985) is a graphic representation of the definition of a word that focuses on three questions. It is useful for helping students develop a general concept of definition. It makes them aware of the types of information which make up a definition and how that information is organized. This technique has been reported to improve word and concept knowledge as well as comprehension across grade levels, in a variety of content areas, and with a variety of learners, including ESL and bilingual. This technique also builds on students’ contributions of their knowledge and experiences.

  B. Formulation of the Problem

  Considering the background above, the problem is formulated as follow: Is there any significant difference of vocabulary achievement of students who are taught through word mapping technique and those who are taught through memorizing game technique?

  C. Objective of the Research

  The objective of the research is to find out whether there is a significant difference of vocabulary achievement of students who are taught through word mapping technique and those who are taught through memorizing game technique.

  D. The Uses of the Research

  The uses of the research are:

  1. As information for English teachers whether there is a significant difference of students’ vocabulary achievement so that they can determine to use memorizing game or word mapping technique to teach vocabulary based on the result found.

  2. It may support theories that memorizing and word mapping can be applied in teaching English especially in teaching vocabulary.

E. Scope of the Research

  This research is a quantitative one in which the writer focused on the significant difference of students’ vocabulary achievement at the second year students of SMPN 4

  Bandar Lampung taught through memorizing game technique and word mapping technique and to compare the results of the two techniques in teaching vocabulary by using statistical data. The materials were based on the Educational Unit Level Curriculum 2006 in teaching English for junior high school students. In this research the writer focused on the content word. The researcher conducted her research in six meetings for each class which consists of tryout test, pretest, 3 times treatments and posttest.

Dokumen yang terkait

A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF STUDENTS’ READING COMPREHENSION ACHIEVEMENT TAUGHT THROUGH INFORMATION TRANSFER TECHNIQUE AND TRANSLATION TECHNIQUE AT FIRST YEAR STUDENTS OF SMAN 2 PRINGSEWU

0 12 51

A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF STUDENTS’ READING COMPREHENSION ACHIEVEMENT TAUGHT THROUGH GRAPHIC ORGANIZERS TECHNIQUE AND TRANSLATION TECHNIQUE AT SMAN 5 BANDAR LAMPUNG

0 4 9

A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF STUDENTS’ READING COMPREHENSION ACHIEVEMENT TAUGHT THROUGH GRAPHIC ORGANIZERS TECHNIQUE AND TRANSLATION TECHNIQUE AT SMAN 5 BANDAR LAMPUNG

0 3 9

Improving Students’ Reading Comprehension Achievement through Reciprocal Teaching Technique at the Second Year of SMPN 21 Bandar Lampung (A Classroom Action Research)

0 5 59

A COMPARATIVE STUDY BETWEEN STUDENTS’ ACHIEVEMENT IN PREPOSITION OF PLACE TAUGHT THROUGH REALIA AND TAUGHT THROUGH PICTURES AT THE SEVENTH GRADE OF SMPN 21 BANDAR LAMPUNG

0 3 27

A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF STUDENTS’ READING COMPREHENSION ACHIEVEMENT TAUGHT THROUGH SQ3R AND TAUGHT THROUGH TRANSLATION TECHNIQUE AT THE SECOND YEAR OF SMP NEGERI 8 BANDAR LAMPUNG

3 69 60

A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF STUDENTS’ READING COMPREHENSION ACHIEVEMENT BETWEEN THOSE TAUGHT THROUGH PREDICTIVE TECHNIQUE AND THOSE TAUGHT THROUGH MAKING INFERENCES TECHNIQUE AT THE SECOND GRADE OF SMAN 1 KOTAGAJAH

0 10 61

A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF STUDENTS’ READING COMPREHENSION ACHIEVEMENT BETWEEN THOSE TAUGHT THROUGH PREDICTIVE TECHNIQUE AND THOSE TAUGHT THROUGH MAKING INFERENCES TECHNIQUE AT THE SECOND GRADE OF SMAN 1 KOTAGAJAH

2 14 60

A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF STUDENTS’ LISTENING COMPREHENSION ACHIEVEMENT TAUGHT THROUGH VIDEO AND THOSE TAUGHT THROUGH AUDIO IN SMPN 26 BANDAR LAMPUNG

1 26 59

INCREASING STUDENTS’ VOCABULARY ACHIEVEMENT THROUGH EXTENSIVE READING AT SECOND YEAR OF SMPN 6 BANDAR LAMPUNG

0 3 84