Data Collecting Technique Procedures of Collecting Data

3.4 Data Collecting Technique

In the process of data collecting, speaking tests were used as the instrument. There were two types of tests; pretest and posttest which are elaborated as follows: 1. Pretest Pretest was conducted before treatments were given. It was carried out in order to know how far the students had mastered speaking before treatments. The data collected in this research were used to measure whether there is a significant difference or not between the students’ speaking achievement, in the experimental class 1 and 2. 2. Posttest Posttest was conducted after the employment of treatments. It was carried out in order to know the increase of the students’ speaking achievement after being given treatments. The form of the test was the same as that in the pretest. It was conducted in 80 minutes, 10 minutes for each group since the oral performance was done in group which consists of five students respectively.

3.5 Procedures of Collecting Data

Related to data collecting process, there were some procedures applied for this research, they were: 1. Determining the subject of the research Two out of nine classes of grade X of SMA N I Natar were selected as the subjects of the research. One class became the experimental class 1 and one class was the experimental class 2, determined by using simple probability sampling using coin. 2. Preparing materials for pretest In this research, there were two pretests conducted both in the experimental class 1 and experimental class 2. The topic was about narrative story. The materials were taken from students’ handbook based on the School-based Curriculum. 3. Conducting the pretest Pretest was conducted in order to measure students’ basic speaking ability before being given treatments. It was in form of oral test of monologue, carried out in 80 minutes. 4. Giving treatments There were three times of treatments conducted in this research. Each treatment was held for 90 minutes, consisting of procedures of teaching speaking through silent viewing and sound-only technique. 5. Conducting the posttest The posttests were conducted both in the experimental class 1 and 2. They were held in order to measure the increase of the students’ speaking achievement. The same as the pretest, posttest was conducted in 80 minutes, in form of oral test of monologue presentation. 6. Analyzing the test result pretest and posttest After pretest and posttest were conducted, the data of these two tests were analyzed by using independent groups T-test. The mean of the pretests and posttests both in the experimental and control class were compared. It was done to know whether there was a significant difference between the two techniques in contributing increase toward the students’ speaking achievement.

3.6 Criteria for Evaluating Students’ Speaking Performance

Dokumen yang terkait

A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF STUDENTS’ VOCABULARY ACHIEVEMENT BETWEEN THE STUDENTS WHO ARE TAUGHT THROUGH LOGICO AND THOSE TAUGHT THROUGH TRANSLATION AT THE THIRD YEAR OF SD N 6 METRO PUSAT

0 5 8

A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF STUDENTS’ VOCABULARY ACHIEVEMENT BETWEEN THOSE WHO ARE TAUGHT THROUGH LOGICO AND THOSE TAUGHT THROUGH CROSSWORD PUZZLE AT THE SEVENTH GRADE OF SMP NEGERI 21 BANDAR LAMPUNG

5 48 74

A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF STUDENTS’ READING COMPREHENSION ACHIEVEMENT BETWEEN THOSE TAUGHT THROUGH RECIPROCAL TEACHING TECHNIQUE AND THOSE TAUGHT THROUGH CONTEXTUAL TEACHING AND LEARNING AT THE SECOND GRADE OF SMP NEGERI 5 METRO

1 7 62

A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF STUDENTS’ READING COMPREHENSION ACHIEVEMENT BETWEEN THOSE TAUGHT THROUGH RECIPROCAL TEACHING TECHNIQUE AND THOSE TAUGHT THROUGH CONTEXTUAL TEACHING AND LEARNING AT THE SECOND GRADE OF SMP NEGERI 5 METRO

0 3 50

A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF STUDENTS’ SPEAKING ABILITY BETWEEN THOSE WHO ARE TAUGHT THROUGH ROLE PLAY AND THOSE THROUGH JIGSAW TECHNIQUES

1 13 64

A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF STUDENTS’ VOCABULARY ACHIEVEMENT BETWEEN THE STUDENTS’ WHO ARE TAUGHT THROUGH DIRECT METHOD AND THOSE WHO ARE TAUGHT THROUGH SILENT WAY AT THE FOURTH YEAR OF SDN 1 PISANG PENENGAHAN LAMPUNG SELATAN

4 20 53

COMPARATIVE STUDY OF STUDENTS’ READING ACHIEVEMENT BETWEEN THOSE WHO ARE TAUGHT THROUGH RETELLING STORY AND THOSE TAUGHT THROUGH TRANSLATING A FAIRY TALE AT THE FIRST GRADE OF MA MA’ARIF 4 KALIREJO LAMPUNG TENGAH

0 12 46

A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF STUDENTS’ READING COMPREHENSION ACHIEVEMENT OF NARRATIVE TEXT BETWEEN STUDENTS WHO ARE TAUGHT THROUGH GRAPHIC ORGANIZER AND THROUGH LITERAL TRANSLATION AT THE FIRST GRADE OF SMAN 1 NATAR

2 8 74

A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF STUDENTS’ READING COMPREHENSION ACHIEVEMENT BETWEEN THOSE TAUGHT THROUGH PREDICTIVE TECHNIQUE AND THOSE TAUGHT THROUGH MAKING INFERENCES TECHNIQUE AT THE SECOND GRADE OF SMAN 1 KOTAGAJAH

0 10 61

A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF STUDENTS’ READING COMPREHENSION ACHIEVEMENT BETWEEN THOSE TAUGHT THROUGH PREDICTIVE TECHNIQUE AND THOSE TAUGHT THROUGH MAKING INFERENCES TECHNIQUE AT THE SECOND GRADE OF SMAN 1 KOTAGAJAH

2 14 60