Multiple Image Versions Background for Image Coordinate Transformation Services
surface. For example, this additional data is often grid elevation data. Alternately, two or more stereoscopically overlapping images can be used, that show the same ground point viewed from
different directions. In this case, the multiple image geometry mathematical models can be used, with the point coordinates in each image, to determine the corresponding 3–D ground position. A
single IFSAR image can be used to derive the corresponding 3–D ground position, because the gray value represents the distance from the camera to the ground point.
An accurate image geometry model is more complex than a simple polynomial coordinate transformation, between ground coordinates and image coordinates. This document primarily
considers high accuracy image geometry models for general images. Much simpler geometry models are adequate when low accuracy is sufficient, or for images that have been orthorectified.
Also, much simpler geometry models can provide medium horizontal accuracy for rectified or nearly-vertical images, when the imaged ground is relatively flat. Many different high accuracy
image geometry models can be used, as summarized in Topic Volume 7: The Earth Imagery Case [1].
There are multiple possible geometry models for an image, with different properties. For example, a rigorous geometry model can be accurately adjusted, but has high computation requirements. On
the other hand, a non-rigorous or “approximate” geometry model has lesser computation requirements, but cannot be accurately adjusted. Conversion from a rigorous geometry model to a
corresponding approximate geometry model for the same image is then sometimes required. However, conversion from an approximate geometry model to a rigorous geometry model is
usually not possible or practical.
The term “approximate” image geometry model is used here as a synonym for a “non-rigorous” image geometry model. However, many degrees of accuracy are possible when considering the
position errors introduced by the approximation, from large position errors through no detectable position errors. For example, the “Universal Approximate Image Geometry Model” described in
Section 6.5 of Topic 7 can be fitted to almost all rigorous models with no significant position error. Similarly, the “Grid Interpolation Image Geometry Model” described in Section 6.3 of Topic 7 can
approximate a rigorous model with no significant position errors, if enough grid points are used.
An approximate image geometry model has often been called a “real-time” geometry model, and that is the term now used in Topic Volume 7: The Earth Imagery Case [1]. The need for a fast
“real-time” geometry model is decreasing, as computer speeds increase. However, a fast geometry model is still useful in some situations such as generating complex feature graphics overlaid on an
image. On the other hand, an “approximate” image geometry model can be needed or useful for other purposes, such as ignorance or inaccessibility of a rigorous geometry model.
Note: Although Abstract Specification Topic 7 defines both rigorous and “real-time” or approximate image geometry models, Topic 7 currently includes examples of only approximate
image geometry models. It would be useful to add examples of rigorous image geometry models to Topic 7, but no volunteer has yet proposed a description of any rigorous model.