Hard copy: Submit one 1 hard copy set of all materials to:

CIR Accounting Application The purpose of this application is to initiate the Continuous Improvement Review CIR process for accounting accreditation and to provide updates on alignment with AACSB Eligibility Procedures along with actions completed related to the accreditation standards issues noted in the correspondence from AACSB following the last CIR review and actions taken in response to continuous improvement and consultative feedback. The application is subdivided into five parts:  Part I Institution Information  Part II Eligibility Procedures  Part III Continuous Improvement and Consultative Feedback  Part IV Scope of Accreditation Eligibility Criterion D  Part V Review Schedule and Comparison Groups CIR applications are due on July 1st, two years prior to the review year. Applications are reviewed by AACSB staff upon receipt for content and completeness. If responses or requests are not clearly aligned with the Eligibility Criteria or for other reasons that need further review, the application will be referred to the Accounting Accreditation Committee. More in-depth information regarding the Eligibility Criteria are in the Eligibility Procedures and Standards for Accounting Accreditation, which can be found at http:www.aacsb.eduaccreditationstandards2013-accounting . Please note: For institutions that hold both business and accounting accreditation, separate business and accounting CIR applications must be submitted by the July 1 deadline. Information found in the business application that also applies to the accounting application does not have to be repeated in the accounting application. In these cases, the accounting application should reference the business application. Application Submission Information Please submit this application and any accompanying documents via email to the Accounting Accreditation Committee Chair at AACaacsb.edu Please note:  Application is due on July 1st, two years prior to the review year.  There is a page limit of 30 pages not including tables and required documentation.  Email attachments totaling at least 10MB will not be received due to server limitations.  A confirmation of receipt will be emailed within 1-2 business days.  Paper copies are no longer required. For questions or assistance in completing this application, please contact your AACSB Accreditation Staff Liaison. A complete list of staff liaisons is located at www.aacsb.eduaccreditationcontact . Revised January 2017 1 APPLICATION SUBMISSION INFORMATION Please submit this application and the accompanying cover letter as follows: Electronically: Submit via email one set of all materials to the Continuous Improvement Review Committee Chair at CIRCaacsb.edu . APPLICATION SUBMISSION INFORMATION Please submit this application and the accompanying cover letter as follows: 1. Electronically: Submit via email one set of all materials to the Accounting Accreditation Committee Chair at AACaacsb.edu . If applicable, this should include a link to course catalogs available online.

2. Hard copy: Submit one 1 hard copy set of all materials to:

PART I – Institution Information Name of Institution Name of Business Unit Name of Accounting Unit Mailing Address Campus Box or Mail Code City for schools with campuses in multiple cities, enter city that main campus resides in StateProvenceRegion Postal Code Country Telephone Number include countrycity code or area code Fax Number include countrycity code or area code E-Mail Address NameTitle of Business Unit Head Dean or equivalent NameTitle of Accounting Unit Head NameTitle of Provost or equivalent Academic Vice President, etc. NameTitle of Chief Executive Officer or equivalentPresident, Chancellor, etc. Revised January 2017 2 PART II – Eligibility Procedures Provide an update on how the school aligns with the Eligibility Criteria. Examples should be provided for each criterion in order to demonstrate adherence to AACSB’s eligibility requirements http:www.aacsb.edu-mediaaacsbdocsaccreditationstandardsaccountingstds_2013_update- 3oct_final.ashx . Criterion A - ETHICAL BEHAVIOR The accounting academic unit must encourage and support ethical behavior by students, faculty, administrators, and professional staff. Criterion B - COLLEGIATE ENVIRONMENT The accounting academic unit maintains a collegiate environment in which students, faculty, administrators, professional staff, and practitioners interact and collaborate in support of learning, scholarship, and community engagement. Criterion C - COMMITMENT TO CORPORATE AND SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY The accounting academic unit must demonstrate a commitment to address, engage, and respond to current and emerging corporate social responsibility issues e.g., diversity, sustainable development, environmental sustainability, and globalization of economic activity across cultures through its policies, procedures, curricula, research, andor outreach activities. Criterion E - OVERSIGHT, SUSTAINABILITY, AND CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT The accounting academic unit must be structured to ensure proper oversight, accountability, and responsibility for the accounting academic operations; it must be supported by continuing resources human, financial, infrastructure, and physical; and it must have policies and processes for continuous improvement. Revised January 2017 3 PART III – Continuous Improvement and Consultative Feedback Describe the accounting academic units actions that have been taken and progress to date in responding to “concerns that must be addressed prior to or at the time of the next review” stated in the official correspondence from the Board of Directors regarding the most recent AACSB accounting accreditation review. For each response please note the 2013 Standards that corresponds to the addressed concern. Standard Concern Insert additional rows as needed Optional The accounting academic unit has identified the below listed non-accreditation related topics that it would like to receive consultative feedback on from the team. Topic Additional Information Insert additional rows as needed Revised January 2017 4 PART IV – S cope of Accreditation Eligibility Criterion D Degree Programs in Accounting to be Included in Accreditation Review Confirm all degree programs in accounting subjects at all levels and in all locations offered through the accounting academic unit within your institution that will be included in the scope of accreditation are listed in the Business School Questionnaire BSQ within DataDirect. Edits to the included programs list should be made via the BSQ. Please contact your AACSB Staff Liaison if the BSQ has been closed andor programs are started after the reporting period for the BSQ. Degree Programs in Accounting Previously Excluded in Accreditation Review: Confirm all degree programs in accounting that have been previously excluded from review are listed in the BSQ as excluded. If a program is not listed in the BSQ, and should be added to the exclusions for your institution, add to Table A.1 and check 8. Please note: previously excluded programs do not require completion of the Exclusion Request Form. Table A.1 – New Degree Programs in Accounting to be Excluded in Accreditation Review: List new degree programs in accounting for which you intend to seek exclusion from accreditation review. Indicate all criteria for exclusion which apply to each requested program. A “Request for Program Exclusion” form must be submitted for each requested program and included with this application. Schools must provide exclusion requests only for new degrees, degrees whose name have changed, or substantive changes in previously excluded degrees that have occurred since the last review. The “Request for Program Exclusion” form is provided in Appendix A. An excerpt on program exclusions from Criterion D is provided in Appendix B. More in-depth information on the bases for exclusion are in the Eligibility Procedures and Standards for Accounting Accreditation, which can be found at http:www.aacsb.eduaccreditationstandards2013- accounting Revised January 2017 5 Table A.1 New Degree Programs to be Excluded from Review: Please complete the table below. A Program Exclusion Request Form Appendix A must be completed for each of the below – not including previously excluded programs. Schools must provide exclusion requests only for new degrees, degrees whose name have changed, or substantive changes in previously excluded degrees that have occurred since the last review. Degree Title 1 Major Emphasis 1 Sub Emphasis 1 Department Division Administrative Unit Conferring Degree 2 Bases for Exclusion: check all that apply 1 .In d e p e n d e n c e 3 2 .P ro g ra m D is ti n ct iv e n e ss 3 3 .O p e ra ti o n a l C o n tr o l 3 4 .S u b je ct t o N o n -B u s in e ss A c c re d it a ti o n 5 .S p ec ia liz e d F ie ld 6 .S e p a ra te L o ca ti o n 7 .P a rt ic ip a te B u t N o t N am e d 8 . P re v io u s ly E xc lu d e d N o t L is te d in t h e B S Q Insert additional rows as needed 1 1 List each program by the degree which is offered including majors andor concentrations. 2 2 Regardless of what colleges, schools, departments, or divisions collaborate to deliver or administer the degree, please indicate the administrative unit which confers the diploma i.e. College of Business, College of Liberal Arts and Sciences. 3 Program must satisfy this category condition to be excluded. Revised January 2017 6 PART V: Review Schedule and Comparison Groups Review Schedule We request a Peer Review Team visit in: Visit year July 1 – June 30 Rank in order of preference July 1 – December 1 January 15 – March 31 April 1 – June 30 Specific visit dates will be requested after the first of the year along with team member nominations. Comparison Groups Schools may use DataDirect to assist in the selection of peer and aspirant schools. For more information, click here: http:www.aacsb.eduknowledgedatadatadirecthelp . Comparable Peers - A minimum of six comparable peers are necessary to supply the comparable peers statistical data report sent to the school and team prior to your visit if requested. Competitive Group - Schools listed here do not count towards the minimum of six comparable peers or minimum of three aspirant schools. Aspirant Group - A minimum of three aspirants are necessary to supply the comparable peers statistical data report sent to the school and team prior to your visit if requested. Revised January 2017 7 SIGNATURES The Head of the Accounting Academic Unit and the institution’s administration have reviewed this information. The institution’s administration confirms that the information in this document is trustworthy and accurate. ☐By checking this box, I certify the above is true. Name of Head of Accounting Academic Unit Name of Head of Business School Dean or equivalent Name of Chief Executive Officer or equivalent President, Chancellor, etc. Revised January 2017 8 APPENDIX A Program Exclusion Request A separate copy of this form is required for each degree program for which exclusion from the AACSB International accreditation review is requested. Please complete every required section of the form marked with an , and as many of the optional sections that apply. Name of Institution:       Name and Title of Person Completing Form:       Full Title and Descriptive Information for Program for which Exclusion is being requested include the percentage of business content in the degree program:       Bases for exclusion: Provide a brief, clear description of how the program satisfies the required and all other relevant categories. Descriptions of the category expectations are discussed in Eligibility Procedure Criterion D of the Eligibility Procedures and Standards for Accounting Accreditation.

1. Independence Demonstration of limited or no participation in, and a high level of independence