PUBLIC MARKET MANAGEMENT MODEL-BASED PUBLIC PARTICIPATION - Digital Library Universitas Muhammadiyah Purwokerto
PUBLIC MARKET MANAGEMENT MODEL-BASED PUBLIC
PARTICIPATION
1) 2) 3) 4) Achmad Choerudin , Septiana Novita Dewi ,Aris Tri Haryanto ,Ifah Latifah1) Akademi Teknologi AUB Surakarta, Central Java / Email:achmadchoerudin77@yahoo.co.id
2)
STIE AUB Surakarta, Central Java, Indonesia
3)
STIE AUB Surakarta, Central Java, Indonesia
4)
STIE AUB Surakarta, Central Java, Indonesia
Abstract : The study of public market-based market management model is aimed at knowing and
analyzing the public market-based management of participation and public input in policy making. This research in various public market in Indonesia. In this research model, findings (1) problems that occur in the management of the market caused by technical problems and non technical. These problems will be anticipated by good market management models such as management autonomy, integrated management systems and maximizing market revenues, (2) market management models based on community participation, policy making in management of public markets derived from governments, academics and traders through inputs and participation are permissible under existing regulations and important role for government policy to accepted and applied, and (3) the management of a good public market in the digital age requires a sustainable technology role and in accordance with existing information technology developments.
Keywords: management model, public market, community participation
INTRODUCTION
The globalization era in economic sector in particular trade marked the emergence of the modern world at variety of stores. The modern shop is managed with a more modern concept of reducing the presence of public markets (Suryadharma, 2011; Setyowati & Gunawan, 2013). The presence of modern markets, especially supermarkets and hypermarkets, is considered to have been cornering the existence of public markets in urban areas. In Indonesia, there are 13,450 public markets with about 12.6 million small traders (Kompas, 2006). The results of a study by A.C. Nielsen, the market in Indonesia grew 31.4% a year, whereas public markets shrink 8% per year. If this condition remains left, thousands even millions of traders will lose their livelihood. Public markets would probably sinking along with the development of the retail world is currently dominated by modern market (R&D, 2012).
The presence of modern retailers on consumers from the middle onwards, when it became an alternative to the more public markets are identical to seedy market conditions, with the look and quality of bad, as well as lower selling prices and system of bargaining conventional (Sandra, 2012; Setyowati & Gunawan, 2013). The effort to balance the market position of public with modern markets has not concretely done as there is no policy that supports public markets, for example in terms of purchasing agricultural products there is no subsidy from the government so that the products that go into public markets compete in terms of quality to products that go into modern market (Sunanto, 2012).
The current public traders competitive by modern market in terms of revenue modern market such as supermarkets, stores, department stores, etc. (Sunanto, 2010), Besides being able to sell goods with cheaper price, place more comfortable because of its social and public facilities are met, so that more attractive buyer ( Suryadarma, 2011). Due to the high market prices result revitalization, many traders who used to have several stalls to sell, forced the remaining one, to close down the stalls, purchasing the adjustment is at least 30% of total selling price (Paskarina et. al., 2007). Based on the above, then the government needs to develop and implement government policy with regard to proposals, community participation to improve the management of public markets. One of them through the legal, policy and community participation. The problems that emerged is how the laws of country with system of those policies that had a common , abstract and comes to excise can be received directed to community , especially order of local community of a country or area (Tanya, 2010). Therefore it is necessary to community participation in the development management model public markets in Indonesia.
METHOD
The methodology was used this research and devolepment who all levels different research methods. For a population is public markets in Indonesia. To the sample is public markets that maintained by the government regions in Surakarta, Balikpapan and Mataram. Thus has the decree in the regulation of Indonesia with the norm, criteria public market management and procedures. This was done in the sample collection technique survey the sampling method of collecting samples was in proportion, in accordance with procedures research will be done. The collection of data by questionnaire and an interview or a question as well as answer session.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION Findings Problems in Public Markets
The research be done about model public market management at market in Indonesia. The development of marketplace is basically to meet basic needs the community as consumers or object the development of marketplace. The implementation of markets themselves of needed a management good governance which for the sustainability of markets themselves. Professional management is expected to keep sustainability market with an increase in competitiveness of public markets with modern markets that is getting expanded broad to region so will give satisfaction good service on community.
Many of the other problems that occurs at public markets in Indonesia is: (1) going on of changes in regulations both vertically and horizontally that deals with the management of public markets, (2) the realization physical (acquisition of land, utilization and expansion of land) as well as non physical (recipe for disaster, the financial situation and trading of activities, psychological traders and continuation of activity trading) , (3) arrangement of the zoning of market, (4) obstacles in publicly listed financial services company and income from market services fees retribution are who do not as targeted therefore the budget, (5) changes in the market class, (6) problems that had occurred a means of market in a working meeting with a principal vehicle and the supporting for infrastructure, (7) deployment of traders, (8) the forest law enforcement governance found guilty of violation in an orderly manner to market, (9) waste disposal and market cleanliness, (10) connection with management under this category consist of market to build character and psychological traders, trade on line , (11) the financing of capital and (12) to technical problem the three and contacting other. To overcome cases , there should have been the role of government to realize management of good market , then required the principles in a market management of them (Arisan Barwani, 2016):
Autonomy Management
Their authority under regional autonomy the local government to can directs the command who are mandatory the government. Under regional autonomy owned, market managers having greater autonomy in managing its market. Through autonomy, market managers more defenseless of implementing and activities in accordance with market needs, traders, community and various potentials.
Management in autonomy means that its unit market being able to decide own problems arise in market with the best solution, and they know the most what is best for its market. The restructuring the management in market management support by Kim, Lee and Ahn (2004) and Murshid (2011) that in public markets need to improvement management, facilities and infrastructure to do revitalization toward modern.
Integrated Management Systems
Governance is one of the most important element in a market for good. The market must be managed with integrated management in which all management aspects of integrated market in one system. All market management system it is requisite professional management. Murshid (2011) and Kim et al. (2004) that in a market management need management systems integration , technology, good market infrastructure and other in challenges. It can not be managed in a separate one part with another part.
The market manager should integrated with financial management market, especially in terms of management of parking , planning , finance operational and care. In terms of management parking lot own resources must be integrated to needs of workers on every part and integrated with financial management market in payrol and needs the cost to development of employees , management cleanliness in order embodiment market clean will not succeed in absence of cooperation between part cleanliness with human resources and finance division, especially in providing labor required in finance the operational cleanliness. Market management integrated are key to creation of professional management market.
Income Maximize
The sustainability of income to market determined by income from operational of market. The income market operational to fund market can be obtained from number of sources. Maximize income market is a the requirement for market managers to keep the persistence of the markets themselves. In addition to seek out new sources of income market , the management also must be able to minimize leakage income that often occurs in the market operational. The increase in income in the public market through the implementation of payment, system and procedures for payment of good commercial and the system of market (Murshid, 2011; Kim et al., 2004).
Management Model Based Public Participation
In the above model, the role of government, market and traders. These three components form a model form. In more details, that the shape of model has yet to implement relationships or helix synergy of governments, universities, and industry will further give the certainty of availability of innovation, good product or business processes (Malik, 2015), then the role of three elements, namely triple helix.
The role of academics who were a part of elaborated in scholar the form of role of promised to supply: the role of education should be aimed at encourage the creative ways to cope with generation been attained by Indonesia in patterns of thought that supports the other financial markets grow and his work in the management of market. The role of research was being conducted to give or suggestions about a model policy for developing the pattern of public and absence of mount of money needed, as well as produce a policy of supporting how it works and use of resources being efficient as well as make the most powerful industry creative ways to cope with national average which competitive since it creates substantial.
The role of business, a business actor represents businessmen, investors and creators of new technologies, and consumer: (a) creator, as a centre of excellence of creator of products and services, new markets which could absorb the resulting products and services, as well as the creator of ground work for creative individuals or other supporting individuals. ( b) Forming communities and creative entrepreneur, i.e. as a public space that forms the motorcycle scene of sharing thoughts, mentoring can hone creativity in doing business, business coaching or management training the management of market.
The role of governments, the role of key government in development of trade is (a) catalyst and facilitators as well as advocacy gives support, challenges and encouragement, that ideas a business engaged a level of competence higher. The support can be commitment of government to use force his political with well-proportioned and providing services administration public with good besides support financial assistance, incentives or protection, (b) regulator, that produces policies related to people, industry, institutions, intermediation and resources and technology. The government to speed up the market public if government able to make a policy that creating a business climate that conducive to trade, ( c ) consumer , investors even the government as investors should can empower asset as productive in scope trading and public market management and responsible for investment in infrastructure industry , (d ) urban planner. The creativity going to grow fertile with cities having climate and business potential. That economic development run well we need to created potential and competitiveness areas that could make a magnet that appealing to individual to open a business in public markets in Indonesia.
Mubyarto (1997) that defines participation as a willingness to help the success of any program according to ability of every person without means their self interest. Participation in the study is done by way of :
1. People can form opinions through the mass media that people really need the welfare traders and public involving.
2. The advice problems faced by sending information to local governments by phone or SMS by showing really in the field, that brings media technology.
3. The critics of public policy issued local governments impartial public interest.
4. The participation of could also happen due to act of courtesy and provide moral support to framers of the form of clear policies. This stage the removal the community had to play a more active role control the creation of whether the input of factors can mean that community accommodated or not.
In addition to funding community participation in public policy, the community need play their
part in carrying out public policy that has been determined by government. The form of the participation was its industrial activity among others: the form of clear policies levies was put into effect and management of the prices of other commodities in the form of levies or financing that was other.
Findings of utilization of technology the digital era
The process of growth in middle of bankruptcy moslem in economic trade public markets influenced by factors of economy and non economy classes. Economic factors that influence the development and economic growth is the source of natural resources , human resources which are needed, a larger resident accumulation of capital as well as quality of human capital are managerial who organize and regulate production factor . Other economic factors other than a fuel that supports of factors the production of is the progression of technology. For the majority of economists , the progression of technology regarded as the source of most important and determine in process of development and economic growth. Technology are how of factors the production of combined to bring about a objectives the production.
In the development of this market management, the role of technology is needed to improve the promotion, market development, regulations and means of participation on the government and regional governments. This finding supports by Guo and Sun (2004) electronic technology that rules will reduce production costs, distribution and need collaboration to challenge of global market especially public markets, to make use of the opportunities or fissure . Market traders now need to understand about the technology, due to the influence of global trade.
Conclusions 1. That the problem occurring in market management caused by technical issues and non technical.
These problems would can be anticipated with a model market management in the form of both autonomy management, integrated management systems and maximize income market.
2. That management model of those markets based on public participation, is the policy in public market management come from the government, academics and traders through inputs and participation allowed according to the rules. The contribution of public participation provide a leadership role important to do so that government policy acceptable and applied.
3. That of public market management both in the digital era need the sustainable the role of technology and according to the development of information technology.
Acknowlegdement
Thank you utterance researchers to thank the Ministry of Research , Technology and Higher Education of Republic Indonesia Grants over the year 2018 , the local government in the study locations, Akademi Teknologi AUB Surakarta, STIE AUB Surakarta, Indonesia and the entire people public market traders in Indonesia.
References
Anderson, James E. 1997. Public Policy-Making. Third Edition. New York : Holt, Rinehart and Winston. Anonim, 2015. SNI 8152: 2015 tentang Pasar Rakyat, Jakarta. Annonim, 2015. Standar Pelayanan Masyarakat pada Pasar Rakyat, Pusat Standarisasi Lingkungan dan Kehutanan, Kementerian LH dan Kehutanan, Jakarta. Assihidiqqie, Jimly. 2010. Konstitusi Ekonomi. Kompas Gramedia. Jakarta Arisan Barwani.2016. Tata Kelola Pasar Tradisional Lampung. Universitas Lampung Boeke, J.H. 1953. Economics and Economic Policy of Dual Societies: As Exemplified by Indonesia.
N.V. Haarlem:HD Tjeenk Willink & Zoon. Chambers Robert. 1987. Pembangunan Desa; Mulai dari Belakang. LP3ES -----------------------.1996. Participatory Rural Appraisal (PRA); Memahami Desa secara Partisipatif.
Oxfam – Yayasan Mitra Tani. Choerudin, Achmad., & Sulistiyani, Lilik. 2006. Kegiatan Evaluasi Produk Hukum Daerah Pemerintah
Kota Surakarta tentang Pasar dan Retribusi Pasar. Laporan Akhir Kegiatan. Pemerintah Kota Surakarta. Choerudin, Achmad., & Trijanto, Singgih. 2013. Penyusunan Pendataan Sumber-sumber Pendapatan:
Pendapatan Retribusi Pelayanan Pasar pada Sewa Los Pasar. Laporan Akhir Kegiatan. Pemerintah Kota Surakarta. Choerudin, Achmad., & Trijanto, Singgih. 2014. Penyusunan Pendataan Sumber-sumber Pendapatan: Pendapatan Retribusi Pelayanan Pasar pada Sewa Kios Pasar. Laporan Akhir Kegiatan.
Pemerintah Kota Surakarta. Choerudin, Achmad., & Asriningtyas, Tety. 2015. Penyusunan Rancangan Peraturan Perundang- undangan: Evaluasi Peraturan Daerah Kota Surakarta Nomor 1 Tahun 2010 tentang Pengelolaan dan Perlindungan Pasar Tradisional. Laporan Akhir Kegiatan. Pemerintah Kota Surakarta. Choerudin, Achmad., & Asriningtyas, Tety. 2016. Penyusunan Naskah Akademik Peraturan Daerah Kota Surakarta Nomor 1 Tahun 2010 tentang Pengelolaan dan Perlindungan Pasar Tradisional.
Laporan Akhir Kegiatan. Pemerintah Kota Surakarta. Dunn, William N. 1994. Public Policy Analysis : An Introduction. Edisi ke-2. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey : Prentice-Hall, Inc., A Simon & Schuster Company. Terjemahan dari : Gadjah Mada University Press. Yogyakarta.
Etzkowitz, H. and L. Leydesdorff. 1998. The Endless Transition: A "Triple Helix" Of University- Industry-Government Relations. Minerva, Vol 36, No. 3, pp203-208. Fina Risqina. 2010. Partisispasi Masyarakat dalam Pembangunan. Digilib UI. Galanter, Mark. 1981. Justice in many rooms:court, Private Ordering, And Indigenous Law. Journal of Legal Pluralism. Guo, Jing Zhi & Sun, Cheng Zheng. 2004. Global electronic markets and global public markets.
Electronics market. 14(1): 4-12. Holidin, Defny & Handini, Rilyan Shela. 2014. Sound governance analysis in the innovation of public market revitalization and sheet vendors management. International Journal of Administrative
Scinece & Organization. 21(1): 17-26.
Kementerian Pekerjaan Umum. 2011. Kajian Modernisasi Pengelolaan Pasar Tradisional Berbasis Modal Sosial. Puslitbang, Jakarta. Kementerian Riset dan Teknologi Republik Indonesia. 2012. Triple Helix dan Percepatan Inovasi.
Jakarta.http://www.ristek.go.id/index.php/module/News+News/id/11805. 22 Agustus 2012. Khor, Martin. 2002. Globalisasi : perangkap Negara- Negara selatan, Yogyakarta: cindelaras Pustaka Rakyat Cerdas.
Kim, Jul l., Lee, Chang Mo & Ahn, Kun Hyuck. 2004. Dongd emon, a public market place wearing a modern suit: the importance of the social fabric in physical redevelopment. Habitat International, 28: 143-161. Nanang Sutofik:2012. Pemetaan Pasar Tradisional Kota Surakarta.Digilib. UNS.co.id Nurhayati, Siti Fatimah. 2014. Pengelolaan pasar tradisional berbasis musyawarah untuk mufakat.
Benefit. 18(1): 49-56.
Mubyarto, 1980. Ekonomi dan Keadilan Sosial. Aditya Media: Jogyakarta Murshid, KAS. 2011. Public market institution and complex exchange. CFD-CMI Working Paper 1, Dhaka.
Porter, M.E. 1990. The Competitive advantage 07 nations, Hardvard Business Review. Porter, M.E. 1986. Competition in global industries : A Coceptual freme-work. Prabowo, Fajar S.A. & Rahadi, Raden Aswin. 2015. David vs Goliath: Uncovering the future of public markets in Indonesia. Mediterranean Journal of Social Science. 6(5): 28-36.
Sandra, Sunanto, 2012. Modern retail impact in store preference and public retailers in West Java.
Asian Journal of Business Research. 2(2): 7-23.
Satjipto Raharjo. 1977. Hukum dan Perubahan Sosial. Alumni, Bandung. Sulistyono, Adi. 2008. Reformasi Hukum Ekonomi Indonesia.UNS Press: Surakarta. Setyowati, Kristina & Gunawan S, Didik. 2013. Public markets community empowerment model in Good Governance Approach. Public Policy and Adm. Research. 3(7): 85-92.
Suryadharma, Daniel. 2011. Competition between public food traders and supermarkets in Indonesia.
Proceeding of The Crawford 2011 Annual Parliamantery Conference, 49-57.
Tom Ginsburg. 2003. Judicial Reviuw in New Democraties: Constitusional Courts in Asian Cases, Cambrige, Massachusset. Tanya. Bernand. L. 2010. Hukum Dalam Ruang Sosial. Genta Publising: Yogjakarta