PERBEDAAN HASIL SISWA BELAJAR DENGAN MENGGUNAKAN QUANTUM BELAJAR DAN INSTRUKSI LANGSUNG DI SUBTOPIK WAVEIN FISIKA ELEKTROMAGNETIK TINGKAT PERTAMASMA NEGERI 1 BERASTAGI TAHUN AKADEMIK 2011/2012.
THE DIFFERENCE OF STUDENTS’ LEARNING OUTCOMES BY
USING QUANTUM LEARNING AND DIRECT INSTRUCTION
IN SUBTOPICS ELECTROMAGNETIC WAVE
IN PHYSICS OF FIRST GRADE OF
SMA NEGERI 1 BERASTAGI
ACADEMIC YEAR
2011/2012
By:
Ruth Fricilia H. Ginting
Id. Number 408121087
Program Study Bilingual Physics Education
THESIS
Submitted to Fulfill the Requirement for Getting the Degree of Sarjana
Pendidikan
PHYSICS DEPARTMENT
FACULTY OF MATHEMATICS AND SCIENCES
STATE UNIVERSITY OF MEDAN
MEDAN
2012
iv
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
First of all, I would like to thanks God almighty who has been giving me everything to
accomplish this thesis: Patience, health, wisdom, and blessing. Without all these things, I can’t
finish this thesis while it is a condition in order to fulfill of the requirements for the Bachelor
degree from Physics Department, State University of Medan.
I would like to express the sincere gratitude to the Dean of Faculty of Mathematics and
Science State University of Medan: Prof. Drs. Motlan, M.Sc, Ph.D and also as my examiner, I
would like to thanks my great Supervisor, Prof. Dr. Sahyar,MS,MM for guiding me and giving
his precious time, and also great ideas that enable me to complete this thesis. I also want to
convey my sincere gratitude to my academic supervisor, DR. Drs. Ridwan Abd.Sani, M.Si and
my entire examinor: Alkafi Maas Siregar,M.Si and Drs.Makmur Sirait,M.Si. They have given
me many contribute in preparing this thesis well. Beside it, I also want to convey great thanks to
the principal of SMAN I Berastagi, Alberto colia, M.Pd and to Physics teacher there, K. br
Sembiring,S.Si, thanks a lot for making it easy and friendly.
I want to convey a great thank you to all of lecturers for their great contribution in
sharing knowledge and advice during my academic years. I could not complete this thesis well
without their good contribution and ideas.
I would like to express thanks to my beloved parent: R. Ginting and F. Sitorus (the
deceased) who have been giving me encouragement, Motivation, and all of support that I need in
whole of my life. I myself realize that they have much love to give to me and I cannot pay for it.
Then I would like to thanks to my brother and sister: Andrew Valentino Ginting and Tria Puspita
Dewi Ginting. Beside it I won’t forget my friends in my boarding house ‘KOST 121’: Fenny
Sitorus, Dewi Sihotang, Juniati Sembiring, Kak Natalia Girsang, Santi Manalu, and Lisna
Lingga, they are great boarding house members of me and surely my second family here. Thanks
for make me smile while I can’t, all of you are my friends to laugh, to cry, and to share. Believe
me, it means everything. Thanks to b’Rambo that have taught me when I don’t understand about
my research, you give me your spare time to discuss. Thanks to Ebi “tempat
penitipan/peminjaman barang” without you I can’t follow this final examination, hehehe. Thanks
to Reslina and Lia that want to accompany me during the research. Thanks to my friends in my
small group, Rosmala, Julinton, Laurent (also as my classmate) and kak Nova that want to pray
v
for me. Also thanks to my Eklesia Choir that give me place to grow up. Last but not least, I want
to express sincere gratitude to my special one: MJ.Tampubolon for giving me support,
compassion, care, ideas, and also reference to complete this thesis.
I will never forget my entire close friend during my academic years here, Ester, Nawi,
Zia, Febri, Tika, Majid, Lukman, Azwar, Alfan, Risdo, Nurul, Ella, Arini, Bobby and to all
friends that I can’t mention here. I will not forget everything that we’ve shared together.
Finally, I myself realize that this thesis is still far from being perfect, therefore I would
appreciate and welcome some constructive advice to improve this thesis and I hope it will be
precious as it should be.
Medan, July 2012
The Researcher
iii
THE DIFFERENCES OF STUDENTS’ LEARNING OUTCOMES BY
USING QUANTUM LEARNING AND DIRECT INSTRUCTION
IN SUBTOPICS ELECTROMAGNETIC WAVE
IN PHYSICS OF FIRST GRADE OF
SMA NEGERI 1 BERASTAGI
ACADEMIC YEAR 2011/2012
Ruth Fricilia (48121087)
ABSTRACT
This research is purpose to know the differences of students’ learning outcomes by
using Quantum Learning and Direct Instruction in subtopics Electromagnetic Wave in Physics of
first grade of SMA Negeri 1 Berastagi academic year 2011/2012.
This research included to the quasi experiment. The population in this research is all of
classes in first grade (X) semester II SMA Negeri 1 Academic Year 2010/2012, this population is
eight classes in amount. The sample in this research is class X – 7 and class X – 8 (two classes
are selected of eight classes). Kind of sampling that is applied in this research is simple random
sampling. Instruments that used as learning result test namely objective test as big as 20 items
that contains of five options and already valid.
From the research obtained the average of pretest in experiment class is 28.57 with
standard deviation is 6.55 and average of pretest in control class is 24.05 with standard deviation
is 9.30. Calculation of posttest average in experiment class is 74.76 and control class is 66.19.
Data already tested is normal distribution and homogeny. To do hypothesis test used with t two
parties obtained tcalculate = 3.15 and ttable = 2.02. From the research also obtained the average of
learning activities on the whole meeting in experiment class is 80.66% and include into good
category. While the average of learning activities on the whole meeting in control class is
65.18% and include to the good enough category. This case means there are differences of
students’ learning outcomes by using Quantum Learning and Conventional in subtopics
electromagnetic wave in physics of first grade of SMA Negeri 1 Berastagi Academic Year
2011/2012.
LIST OF TABLES
Pages
Table 3.1. The study design posttest control group Pre – test design
26
Table 3.2. Basic Material Specification table of Electromagnetic Wave
28
Table 3.3. Manual of Observation of Student’s Activity
29
Table 3.4. Assessment Criteria of Student’s Activity
29
Table 4.1. Pretest data of experiment and control class
34
Table 4.2. Posttest data of experiment and control class
35
Table 4.3. Calculation Summary of Normality Test
36
Table 4.4. Summary Calculation of Homogeneity Test
37
Table 4.5. Calculation Summary of the t Test in Pretest
37
Table 4.6. Summary of t Test in Posttest
38
Table 4.7. calculation result of student’s activity observation sheet
38
LIST OF FIGURES
Pages
Figure 2.1 Spectrum of Electromagnetic Wave
19
Figure 4.1 Bar chart of data pretest of experiment class and control class
35
Figure 4.2 Bar chart of data posttest of experiment class and control class
36
Figure 4.3 Bar Chart of average value of student’s activity
39
LIST OF APPENDIXES
Pages
Appendix 1
Lesson Plan of Experiment Class
48
Appendix 2
Lesson Plan of Control Class
58
Appendix 3
Table Specification of Outcomes test on the subtopics EW 69
Appendix 4
Descriptor of observation of student’s activity
77
in Experiment class
Appendix 5
Descriptor of observation of student’s activity
79
in Control class
Appendix 6
Student’s Learning Activity Sheet
80
Appendix 7
Observation data distribution sheet of student learning
81
activity in Experiment class
Appendix 8
Observation data distribution sheet of student learning
85
activity in Control class
Appendix 9
Recapitulation of student’s activity value
86
in experiment class
Appendix 10 Recapitulation of student’s activity value in control class
89
Appendix 11 Recapitulation of Student’s learning outcomes of Pretest
90
Appendix 12 Recapitulation of Student’s learning outcomes of Posttest
93
Appendix 13 Value of Pretest and Posttest of Experiment Class
94
Appendix 14 Value of Pretest and Posttest of Experiment Class
95
Appendix 15 Calculation of Average Value, Variants and
97
Deviation Standard
Appendix 16 Normality Test
99
Appendix 17 Homogeneity Test
104
Appendix 18 Hypothesis Testing
106
Appendix 19 Research Documentation
109
REFERENCES
Arikunto, Suharsimi., (2009), Dasar-Dasar Evaluasi Pendidikan, penerbit PT Bumi Aksara,
Jakarta.
Auliyah, Puji., Efektivitas Penggunaan Model Pembelajaran Quantum Learning Tipe
Kinesthetic untuk Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Siswa pada Mata Diklat Algoritma dan
Pemograman. Jurnal FMIPA UPI.
Aunurrahman., (2011), Belajar dan Pembelajaran, penerbit Alfabeta, Bandung
Bobby and Mike., (2000), Quantum Learning Membiasakan Belajar Nyaman dan
Menyenangkan, penerbit Kaifa, Bandung.
Dikrullah, Dikdik, Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Quantum Learning untuk Meningkatkan
Hasil Belajar Siswa pada Mata Pelajaran Teknologi Informasi dan Komunikasi
(TIK), Jurnal FMIPA UPI.
http://www.newhorizons.org/strategies/accelerated/deporter2.htm (accessed on 12th February
2012)
Kusno dan Purwanto, Joko., (2011) Effectiveness of Quantum Learning for Teaching Linear
Program at The Muhammadiyah Senior High School of Purwokerto in Central Java,
Indonesia, International Journal for Educational Studies, EDUCARE.
Purwanto, Budi., (2009), Theory and Application of Phyiscs 1, penerbit Tiga Serangkai,
Solo.
Sabri, Ahmad., (2010), Strategi Belajar Mengajar, penerbit Quantum Teaching, Ciputat.
Sardiman., (2011), Interaksi dan Motivasi Belajar Mengajar, penerbit RajaGrafindo
Persada, Jakarta.
Selman, Victor., (2000), Quantum Learning: Learn Without Learning, International
Business and Economics Research Journal.
Singer, Sarah., (1998)., Result of Implementing Quantum Learning in the Thornton High
School District, South Holland, IL.
Sudjana., (2002), Metoda Statistika, penerbit Tarsito Bandung, Bandung.
Suryabrata, Sumadi., (2009), Metodologi Penelitian, penerbit PT RajaGrafindo Persada,
Jakarta
Trianto, (2007), Model-model Pembelajaran Inovatif Beriorientasi Konstruktivistik, penerbit
Prestasi Pustaka, Jakarta.
USING QUANTUM LEARNING AND DIRECT INSTRUCTION
IN SUBTOPICS ELECTROMAGNETIC WAVE
IN PHYSICS OF FIRST GRADE OF
SMA NEGERI 1 BERASTAGI
ACADEMIC YEAR
2011/2012
By:
Ruth Fricilia H. Ginting
Id. Number 408121087
Program Study Bilingual Physics Education
THESIS
Submitted to Fulfill the Requirement for Getting the Degree of Sarjana
Pendidikan
PHYSICS DEPARTMENT
FACULTY OF MATHEMATICS AND SCIENCES
STATE UNIVERSITY OF MEDAN
MEDAN
2012
iv
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
First of all, I would like to thanks God almighty who has been giving me everything to
accomplish this thesis: Patience, health, wisdom, and blessing. Without all these things, I can’t
finish this thesis while it is a condition in order to fulfill of the requirements for the Bachelor
degree from Physics Department, State University of Medan.
I would like to express the sincere gratitude to the Dean of Faculty of Mathematics and
Science State University of Medan: Prof. Drs. Motlan, M.Sc, Ph.D and also as my examiner, I
would like to thanks my great Supervisor, Prof. Dr. Sahyar,MS,MM for guiding me and giving
his precious time, and also great ideas that enable me to complete this thesis. I also want to
convey my sincere gratitude to my academic supervisor, DR. Drs. Ridwan Abd.Sani, M.Si and
my entire examinor: Alkafi Maas Siregar,M.Si and Drs.Makmur Sirait,M.Si. They have given
me many contribute in preparing this thesis well. Beside it, I also want to convey great thanks to
the principal of SMAN I Berastagi, Alberto colia, M.Pd and to Physics teacher there, K. br
Sembiring,S.Si, thanks a lot for making it easy and friendly.
I want to convey a great thank you to all of lecturers for their great contribution in
sharing knowledge and advice during my academic years. I could not complete this thesis well
without their good contribution and ideas.
I would like to express thanks to my beloved parent: R. Ginting and F. Sitorus (the
deceased) who have been giving me encouragement, Motivation, and all of support that I need in
whole of my life. I myself realize that they have much love to give to me and I cannot pay for it.
Then I would like to thanks to my brother and sister: Andrew Valentino Ginting and Tria Puspita
Dewi Ginting. Beside it I won’t forget my friends in my boarding house ‘KOST 121’: Fenny
Sitorus, Dewi Sihotang, Juniati Sembiring, Kak Natalia Girsang, Santi Manalu, and Lisna
Lingga, they are great boarding house members of me and surely my second family here. Thanks
for make me smile while I can’t, all of you are my friends to laugh, to cry, and to share. Believe
me, it means everything. Thanks to b’Rambo that have taught me when I don’t understand about
my research, you give me your spare time to discuss. Thanks to Ebi “tempat
penitipan/peminjaman barang” without you I can’t follow this final examination, hehehe. Thanks
to Reslina and Lia that want to accompany me during the research. Thanks to my friends in my
small group, Rosmala, Julinton, Laurent (also as my classmate) and kak Nova that want to pray
v
for me. Also thanks to my Eklesia Choir that give me place to grow up. Last but not least, I want
to express sincere gratitude to my special one: MJ.Tampubolon for giving me support,
compassion, care, ideas, and also reference to complete this thesis.
I will never forget my entire close friend during my academic years here, Ester, Nawi,
Zia, Febri, Tika, Majid, Lukman, Azwar, Alfan, Risdo, Nurul, Ella, Arini, Bobby and to all
friends that I can’t mention here. I will not forget everything that we’ve shared together.
Finally, I myself realize that this thesis is still far from being perfect, therefore I would
appreciate and welcome some constructive advice to improve this thesis and I hope it will be
precious as it should be.
Medan, July 2012
The Researcher
iii
THE DIFFERENCES OF STUDENTS’ LEARNING OUTCOMES BY
USING QUANTUM LEARNING AND DIRECT INSTRUCTION
IN SUBTOPICS ELECTROMAGNETIC WAVE
IN PHYSICS OF FIRST GRADE OF
SMA NEGERI 1 BERASTAGI
ACADEMIC YEAR 2011/2012
Ruth Fricilia (48121087)
ABSTRACT
This research is purpose to know the differences of students’ learning outcomes by
using Quantum Learning and Direct Instruction in subtopics Electromagnetic Wave in Physics of
first grade of SMA Negeri 1 Berastagi academic year 2011/2012.
This research included to the quasi experiment. The population in this research is all of
classes in first grade (X) semester II SMA Negeri 1 Academic Year 2010/2012, this population is
eight classes in amount. The sample in this research is class X – 7 and class X – 8 (two classes
are selected of eight classes). Kind of sampling that is applied in this research is simple random
sampling. Instruments that used as learning result test namely objective test as big as 20 items
that contains of five options and already valid.
From the research obtained the average of pretest in experiment class is 28.57 with
standard deviation is 6.55 and average of pretest in control class is 24.05 with standard deviation
is 9.30. Calculation of posttest average in experiment class is 74.76 and control class is 66.19.
Data already tested is normal distribution and homogeny. To do hypothesis test used with t two
parties obtained tcalculate = 3.15 and ttable = 2.02. From the research also obtained the average of
learning activities on the whole meeting in experiment class is 80.66% and include into good
category. While the average of learning activities on the whole meeting in control class is
65.18% and include to the good enough category. This case means there are differences of
students’ learning outcomes by using Quantum Learning and Conventional in subtopics
electromagnetic wave in physics of first grade of SMA Negeri 1 Berastagi Academic Year
2011/2012.
LIST OF TABLES
Pages
Table 3.1. The study design posttest control group Pre – test design
26
Table 3.2. Basic Material Specification table of Electromagnetic Wave
28
Table 3.3. Manual of Observation of Student’s Activity
29
Table 3.4. Assessment Criteria of Student’s Activity
29
Table 4.1. Pretest data of experiment and control class
34
Table 4.2. Posttest data of experiment and control class
35
Table 4.3. Calculation Summary of Normality Test
36
Table 4.4. Summary Calculation of Homogeneity Test
37
Table 4.5. Calculation Summary of the t Test in Pretest
37
Table 4.6. Summary of t Test in Posttest
38
Table 4.7. calculation result of student’s activity observation sheet
38
LIST OF FIGURES
Pages
Figure 2.1 Spectrum of Electromagnetic Wave
19
Figure 4.1 Bar chart of data pretest of experiment class and control class
35
Figure 4.2 Bar chart of data posttest of experiment class and control class
36
Figure 4.3 Bar Chart of average value of student’s activity
39
LIST OF APPENDIXES
Pages
Appendix 1
Lesson Plan of Experiment Class
48
Appendix 2
Lesson Plan of Control Class
58
Appendix 3
Table Specification of Outcomes test on the subtopics EW 69
Appendix 4
Descriptor of observation of student’s activity
77
in Experiment class
Appendix 5
Descriptor of observation of student’s activity
79
in Control class
Appendix 6
Student’s Learning Activity Sheet
80
Appendix 7
Observation data distribution sheet of student learning
81
activity in Experiment class
Appendix 8
Observation data distribution sheet of student learning
85
activity in Control class
Appendix 9
Recapitulation of student’s activity value
86
in experiment class
Appendix 10 Recapitulation of student’s activity value in control class
89
Appendix 11 Recapitulation of Student’s learning outcomes of Pretest
90
Appendix 12 Recapitulation of Student’s learning outcomes of Posttest
93
Appendix 13 Value of Pretest and Posttest of Experiment Class
94
Appendix 14 Value of Pretest and Posttest of Experiment Class
95
Appendix 15 Calculation of Average Value, Variants and
97
Deviation Standard
Appendix 16 Normality Test
99
Appendix 17 Homogeneity Test
104
Appendix 18 Hypothesis Testing
106
Appendix 19 Research Documentation
109
REFERENCES
Arikunto, Suharsimi., (2009), Dasar-Dasar Evaluasi Pendidikan, penerbit PT Bumi Aksara,
Jakarta.
Auliyah, Puji., Efektivitas Penggunaan Model Pembelajaran Quantum Learning Tipe
Kinesthetic untuk Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Siswa pada Mata Diklat Algoritma dan
Pemograman. Jurnal FMIPA UPI.
Aunurrahman., (2011), Belajar dan Pembelajaran, penerbit Alfabeta, Bandung
Bobby and Mike., (2000), Quantum Learning Membiasakan Belajar Nyaman dan
Menyenangkan, penerbit Kaifa, Bandung.
Dikrullah, Dikdik, Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Quantum Learning untuk Meningkatkan
Hasil Belajar Siswa pada Mata Pelajaran Teknologi Informasi dan Komunikasi
(TIK), Jurnal FMIPA UPI.
http://www.newhorizons.org/strategies/accelerated/deporter2.htm (accessed on 12th February
2012)
Kusno dan Purwanto, Joko., (2011) Effectiveness of Quantum Learning for Teaching Linear
Program at The Muhammadiyah Senior High School of Purwokerto in Central Java,
Indonesia, International Journal for Educational Studies, EDUCARE.
Purwanto, Budi., (2009), Theory and Application of Phyiscs 1, penerbit Tiga Serangkai,
Solo.
Sabri, Ahmad., (2010), Strategi Belajar Mengajar, penerbit Quantum Teaching, Ciputat.
Sardiman., (2011), Interaksi dan Motivasi Belajar Mengajar, penerbit RajaGrafindo
Persada, Jakarta.
Selman, Victor., (2000), Quantum Learning: Learn Without Learning, International
Business and Economics Research Journal.
Singer, Sarah., (1998)., Result of Implementing Quantum Learning in the Thornton High
School District, South Holland, IL.
Sudjana., (2002), Metoda Statistika, penerbit Tarsito Bandung, Bandung.
Suryabrata, Sumadi., (2009), Metodologi Penelitian, penerbit PT RajaGrafindo Persada,
Jakarta
Trianto, (2007), Model-model Pembelajaran Inovatif Beriorientasi Konstruktivistik, penerbit
Prestasi Pustaka, Jakarta.