THE SYSTEMATICITY OF INTERLANGUAGE: A CASE STUDY OF SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL LEARNING The Systematicity Of Interlanguage: A Case Study Of Senior High School Learning Foreign Language.
i
THE SYSTEMATICITY OF INTERLANGUAGE: A CASE STUDY
OF SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL LEARNING
FOREIGN LANGUAGE
Thesis Submitted to Fulfill One of the Requirements for the Completion
Of Graduate Degree in Language Education
By
SUHARTINI
S. 200 090 016
DEPARTMENT OF LANGUAGE STUDIES
POST GRADUATE PROGRAM
MUHAMMADIYAH UNIVERSITY OF SURAKARTA
2012
NOTE OF ADVISOR
I
Prof. Dr. Endang Fauziati, M. Hum
Lecturer of Language Study of Graduate prograrn
of
Muhammadiyah University of Surakarta
Official Note on Student's Thesis
Hal : Tesis Saudara Suhafiini
Dear
The Director of Graduate program
Of Muharnmadiyatr University of Surakarta
Assalammu'alaikum Warohmatuilahi wa barokatuh,
Having read, examine4 correcte4 and necessarily revised towards
the thesis of,
Nane
SUHARTINI
NIM
s.200090016
Focus on
English Language Teaching
Konsenhasi
Pengkajian Bahasa Inggns
The title of research
:
The systematicity of Interlanguage;
A
case study of
Senior High School Learning Foreign Language.
I
access that the thesis is approved
the t"anguage study of
to be exarnined by the board of examiners in
Graduate program of Muhammadiyatr University of
Surakarta
wassalammu'alaikum warohmatu[ahi wa barokatuh.
Surakarta..
..2012
Fauziati, M. Hum
ii
NOTE OF ADWSOR TI
Dra Siti Zuhdah Ariatmi, M. Hum
Lecturer of Language Study of Graduate prograur
of
Muhammadiyah Univenity of Surakarta
Official Note on Student's Thesis
Hal : Tesis Saudara Suhafiini
Dear
The Director of Graduate Program
Of Muhalnmadiyah University of Surakarta
Assalammu'alaikum Warohmatullahi wa barokafuh,
Having read examind corrected and necessarily revised towards the thesis of:
Name
SUHARTINI
NIM
s.200090016
Focus on
English Language Teaching
Konsenhasi
Pengkajian Bahasa Inggns
The title of research
:
The systematicity of Interlanguage;
A case study of
Senior High School Learning Foreign Language.
I
access that the thesis is approved to be examined by the board
of examiners in
the Language Study of Graduate Program of Muharnmadiyah University of
Surakarta.
Wassalammu'alaikum Werohmatullahi wa barokatuh.
Surakarta..
Pembimbing
'2012
II
M. Hum
l$
ADVISOR APPROVED
THE SYSTEMATICITY OF INTERLANGUAGE
A CASE STUDY OF SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL
LEARNING FOREIGN LANGUAGE
Prepared by
SUHARTINI
this thesis has been examined by the board of examiner on
October 25"',2012
and has beer-r declared eligible
THE EXAMINER BOARD
1),r...
Advisor
Surakarta.
... P.e.q.e.T.q.e
!..1.::.,..]Q1.?.
_Muhammadiyah University of Surakarta
Graduate Progran-r
Director,
PERT,JYATAAN KEASLIAN TESIS
Saya yang bertanda tangan dibawah ini:
Nama
SUHARTINI
NIM
s.200090016
Program Studi Magister Pengkajia n Bahasa
Konsentrasi
Judul
Tesis
Magister Pengkajian Bahasa Inggris
:The Systematicity of Interlanguage:: A Case Study of Senior High
School Learning
Foreign Language
Menyatakan dengan sebenarnya bahwa tesis yang saya serahkan
ini
benar-benar
merupakan hasil karya sendiri, kecuali kutipan-kutipan dan ringkasan-ringkasan
yang semuanya
telah saya jelaskan sumbernya, dan apabila dikemudian hari terbukti atau
dapat dibuktikan
tesis saya ini hasil jiplakan, maka saya rela bila gelar dan ijazah yang
diberikan Universitas
kepada saya akan batal saya terima.
Surakarta, 6 Desembe r 2AL2
YaqB mem buat pernyataan,
nfu,
s\n{t-ini
I
MOTTO
Don’t feel satisfied to improvement
My Life is for God, Family, Studying and Working
vi
DEDICATION
With the deepest love, this thesis is devoted to
My beloved husband “ Iwan Kismono”
And my son
Habib Ar- Rohman
I LOVE YOU and thanks for your loving
vii
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
THE WRITER WOULD LIKE TO THANK TO Allah, the Almighty God
because of His blessing she can finish her research. There are many difficulties
actually, but she realizes that those without the help of other person, she would
not finish this thesis. Therefore, the writer likes to express her special gratitude to:
1. The Director of Draduate Program of Muhammadiyah University, Prof.
Dr. H. Kudzaifah, SH,M.Hum, for giving the writer permission to write
the thesis.
2. Prof. Dr..Markamah, M.Hum, the head of Graduate Program of the
English Department.
3. Prof. Dr. Endang Fauziati, M.Pd, the first consultant, for the guidance,
support, patience, and time in accomplishing this thesis.
4. Dra. Siti Zuhriah Ariatmi, M. Hum, the second consultant, for his advice,
guidance, and patience for the betterment of this thesis.
5. The students of second grade of MA Ma’rif Cepogo Boyolali who have
helped the writer to get the data and finish this research.
6. Iwan Kismono, my beloved wife who is never tired of giving me the spirit,
care, love, and pray.
7. Luweh, my best mom who help me time to finish my thesis.
8. Habib Ar- Rohman, my beloved son who makes me strong in facing life.
9. Dyaswari Istiqomah, my best friend who support me to finish my thesis.
ix
TABLE OF CONTENT
HALAMAN JUDUL .....................................................................................
i
NOTE ADVISOR I ........................................................................................
ii
NOTE ADVISOR II.......................................................................................
iii
ADVISOR APPROVED ................................................................................
iv
PERNYATAAN KEASLIAN TESIS ............................................................
v
MOTTO..........................................................................................................
vi
DEDICATION ..............................................................................................
vii
PRONOUNCEMENT ...................................................................................
viii
ACKNOWLEDMENT...................................................................................
ix
TABLE OF CONTENT .................................................................................
xi
ABSTRACT ..................................................................................................
xiv
CHAPTER I
CHAPTER II
INTRODUCTION
A. Background of The Study ............................................
1
B. Problem of the Study ....................................................
4
C. Limitation of The Study ...............................................
4
D. Objectives of the Study ................................................
4
E. Benefit of the Study .....................................................
4
UNDERLYING THEORY
A. Previous Study .............................................................
6
B. The Notion of Interlanguage ........................................
10
C. The Process of Interlanguage .......................................
13
xi
CHAPTER III
CHAPTER IV
D. The Areas of Interlanguage ..........................................
15
E. Cognitive Process of Interlanguage .............................
18
F. The Characteristics’ of Interlanguage ..........................
27
G. emedial Teaching ..........................................................
29
H. Teaching Writing .........................................................
30
I. Written Production .......................................................
36
RESEARCH METHOD
A. Types of Research ........................................................
37
B. Object of the Study ......................................................
37
C. Data and Sources of Data .............................................
38
D. Method of Collecting Data ...........................................
38
E. Technique for Analyzing Data .....................................
38
RESEARCH
FINDING,
DISCUSSION,
AND
IMPLICATION
A. Interlanguage System to Represent Present Event ........
39
B. Interlanguage System to Represent Past Event .............
57
C. Interlanguage System to Represents Future Tense ......
71
D. Frequency of Systematicity and Dominant Types of
CHAPTER V
Systematicity................................................................
76
E. Discussion of Finding ..................................................
78
CONCLUSION AND SUGGESTION
A. Systematicity .................................................................
83
B. Conclusion ...................................................................
84
xii
C. Pedagogical Implication ...............................................
86
D. Suggestion ....................................................................
93
BIBLIOGRAPHY
APPENDIX
xiii
ABSTRACT
SUHARTINI. S. 200.090.016. THE SYSTEMATICITY OF
INTERLANGUAGE; A CASE STUDY OF SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL
LEARNING FOREIGN LANGUAGE. Thesis, Surakarta English
Department of Graduate Program, Muhammadiyah University of Surakarta,
2012.
This study aims to describing the systematicity of written by second grade
of Senior High School of MA MA’ARIF Cepogo Boyolali, describing the
frequency of type systematicities, and finding the source influenced systematicity.
The type of this research is descriptive qualitative research. In collecting
the data, the researcher uses documentation method by selecting the
systematicities which are written by second grade students. The steps for
collecting the data are finding students’ composition test with the topic given,
reading and writing the systematicities sentences. The collected data are analyzed
by using Selinker, Smith, and Saville source of systematicities theory.
The results of the research show that the second grade of Senior High
School of Cepogo Boyolali still make 32 systematicities in their compositions.
The writer finds that from 32 data, there are present tense 16, past tense 12, and
future tense 4. The highest frequency of systematicities that the researcher finds
the use of V1 in past tense 86%. The researcher also finds that psychological,
linguistic competence, and sociology influence the sistematicities of student’s
products.
Keyword: systematicity, Interlanguage, Foreign Learning Language
xiv
THE SYSTEMATICITY OF INTERLANGUAGE: A CASE STUDY
OF SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL LEARNING
FOREIGN LANGUAGE
Thesis Submitted to Fulfill One of the Requirements for the Completion
Of Graduate Degree in Language Education
By
SUHARTINI
S. 200 090 016
DEPARTMENT OF LANGUAGE STUDIES
POST GRADUATE PROGRAM
MUHAMMADIYAH UNIVERSITY OF SURAKARTA
2012
NOTE OF ADVISOR
I
Prof. Dr. Endang Fauziati, M. Hum
Lecturer of Language Study of Graduate prograrn
of
Muhammadiyah University of Surakarta
Official Note on Student's Thesis
Hal : Tesis Saudara Suhafiini
Dear
The Director of Graduate program
Of Muharnmadiyatr University of Surakarta
Assalammu'alaikum Warohmatuilahi wa barokatuh,
Having read, examine4 correcte4 and necessarily revised towards
the thesis of,
Nane
SUHARTINI
NIM
s.200090016
Focus on
English Language Teaching
Konsenhasi
Pengkajian Bahasa Inggns
The title of research
:
The systematicity of Interlanguage;
A
case study of
Senior High School Learning Foreign Language.
I
access that the thesis is approved
the t"anguage study of
to be exarnined by the board of examiners in
Graduate program of Muhammadiyatr University of
Surakarta
wassalammu'alaikum warohmatu[ahi wa barokatuh.
Surakarta..
..2012
Fauziati, M. Hum
ii
NOTE OF ADWSOR TI
Dra Siti Zuhdah Ariatmi, M. Hum
Lecturer of Language Study of Graduate prograur
of
Muhammadiyah Univenity of Surakarta
Official Note on Student's Thesis
Hal : Tesis Saudara Suhafiini
Dear
The Director of Graduate Program
Of Muhalnmadiyah University of Surakarta
Assalammu'alaikum Warohmatullahi wa barokafuh,
Having read examind corrected and necessarily revised towards the thesis of:
Name
SUHARTINI
NIM
s.200090016
Focus on
English Language Teaching
Konsenhasi
Pengkajian Bahasa Inggns
The title of research
:
The systematicity of Interlanguage;
A case study of
Senior High School Learning Foreign Language.
I
access that the thesis is approved to be examined by the board
of examiners in
the Language Study of Graduate Program of Muharnmadiyah University of
Surakarta.
Wassalammu'alaikum Werohmatullahi wa barokatuh.
Surakarta..
Pembimbing
'2012
II
M. Hum
l$
ADVISOR APPROVED
THE SYSTEMATICITY OF INTERLANGUAGE
A CASE STUDY OF SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL
LEARNING FOREIGN LANGUAGE
Prepared by
SUHARTINI
this thesis has been examined by the board of examiner on
October 25"',2012
and has beer-r declared eligible
THE EXAMINER BOARD
1),r...
Advisor
Surakarta.
... P.e.q.e.T.q.e
!..1.::.,..]Q1.?.
_Muhammadiyah University of Surakarta
Graduate Progran-r
Director,
PERT,JYATAAN KEASLIAN TESIS
Saya yang bertanda tangan dibawah ini:
Nama
SUHARTINI
NIM
s.200090016
Program Studi Magister Pengkajia n Bahasa
Konsentrasi
Judul
Tesis
Magister Pengkajian Bahasa Inggris
:The Systematicity of Interlanguage:: A Case Study of Senior High
School Learning
Foreign Language
Menyatakan dengan sebenarnya bahwa tesis yang saya serahkan
ini
benar-benar
merupakan hasil karya sendiri, kecuali kutipan-kutipan dan ringkasan-ringkasan
yang semuanya
telah saya jelaskan sumbernya, dan apabila dikemudian hari terbukti atau
dapat dibuktikan
tesis saya ini hasil jiplakan, maka saya rela bila gelar dan ijazah yang
diberikan Universitas
kepada saya akan batal saya terima.
Surakarta, 6 Desembe r 2AL2
YaqB mem buat pernyataan,
nfu,
s\n{t-ini
I
MOTTO
Don’t feel satisfied to improvement
My Life is for God, Family, Studying and Working
vi
DEDICATION
With the deepest love, this thesis is devoted to
My beloved husband “ Iwan Kismono”
And my son
Habib Ar- Rohman
I LOVE YOU and thanks for your loving
vii
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
THE WRITER WOULD LIKE TO THANK TO Allah, the Almighty God
because of His blessing she can finish her research. There are many difficulties
actually, but she realizes that those without the help of other person, she would
not finish this thesis. Therefore, the writer likes to express her special gratitude to:
1. The Director of Draduate Program of Muhammadiyah University, Prof.
Dr. H. Kudzaifah, SH,M.Hum, for giving the writer permission to write
the thesis.
2. Prof. Dr..Markamah, M.Hum, the head of Graduate Program of the
English Department.
3. Prof. Dr. Endang Fauziati, M.Pd, the first consultant, for the guidance,
support, patience, and time in accomplishing this thesis.
4. Dra. Siti Zuhriah Ariatmi, M. Hum, the second consultant, for his advice,
guidance, and patience for the betterment of this thesis.
5. The students of second grade of MA Ma’rif Cepogo Boyolali who have
helped the writer to get the data and finish this research.
6. Iwan Kismono, my beloved wife who is never tired of giving me the spirit,
care, love, and pray.
7. Luweh, my best mom who help me time to finish my thesis.
8. Habib Ar- Rohman, my beloved son who makes me strong in facing life.
9. Dyaswari Istiqomah, my best friend who support me to finish my thesis.
ix
TABLE OF CONTENT
HALAMAN JUDUL .....................................................................................
i
NOTE ADVISOR I ........................................................................................
ii
NOTE ADVISOR II.......................................................................................
iii
ADVISOR APPROVED ................................................................................
iv
PERNYATAAN KEASLIAN TESIS ............................................................
v
MOTTO..........................................................................................................
vi
DEDICATION ..............................................................................................
vii
PRONOUNCEMENT ...................................................................................
viii
ACKNOWLEDMENT...................................................................................
ix
TABLE OF CONTENT .................................................................................
xi
ABSTRACT ..................................................................................................
xiv
CHAPTER I
CHAPTER II
INTRODUCTION
A. Background of The Study ............................................
1
B. Problem of the Study ....................................................
4
C. Limitation of The Study ...............................................
4
D. Objectives of the Study ................................................
4
E. Benefit of the Study .....................................................
4
UNDERLYING THEORY
A. Previous Study .............................................................
6
B. The Notion of Interlanguage ........................................
10
C. The Process of Interlanguage .......................................
13
xi
CHAPTER III
CHAPTER IV
D. The Areas of Interlanguage ..........................................
15
E. Cognitive Process of Interlanguage .............................
18
F. The Characteristics’ of Interlanguage ..........................
27
G. emedial Teaching ..........................................................
29
H. Teaching Writing .........................................................
30
I. Written Production .......................................................
36
RESEARCH METHOD
A. Types of Research ........................................................
37
B. Object of the Study ......................................................
37
C. Data and Sources of Data .............................................
38
D. Method of Collecting Data ...........................................
38
E. Technique for Analyzing Data .....................................
38
RESEARCH
FINDING,
DISCUSSION,
AND
IMPLICATION
A. Interlanguage System to Represent Present Event ........
39
B. Interlanguage System to Represent Past Event .............
57
C. Interlanguage System to Represents Future Tense ......
71
D. Frequency of Systematicity and Dominant Types of
CHAPTER V
Systematicity................................................................
76
E. Discussion of Finding ..................................................
78
CONCLUSION AND SUGGESTION
A. Systematicity .................................................................
83
B. Conclusion ...................................................................
84
xii
C. Pedagogical Implication ...............................................
86
D. Suggestion ....................................................................
93
BIBLIOGRAPHY
APPENDIX
xiii
ABSTRACT
SUHARTINI. S. 200.090.016. THE SYSTEMATICITY OF
INTERLANGUAGE; A CASE STUDY OF SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL
LEARNING FOREIGN LANGUAGE. Thesis, Surakarta English
Department of Graduate Program, Muhammadiyah University of Surakarta,
2012.
This study aims to describing the systematicity of written by second grade
of Senior High School of MA MA’ARIF Cepogo Boyolali, describing the
frequency of type systematicities, and finding the source influenced systematicity.
The type of this research is descriptive qualitative research. In collecting
the data, the researcher uses documentation method by selecting the
systematicities which are written by second grade students. The steps for
collecting the data are finding students’ composition test with the topic given,
reading and writing the systematicities sentences. The collected data are analyzed
by using Selinker, Smith, and Saville source of systematicities theory.
The results of the research show that the second grade of Senior High
School of Cepogo Boyolali still make 32 systematicities in their compositions.
The writer finds that from 32 data, there are present tense 16, past tense 12, and
future tense 4. The highest frequency of systematicities that the researcher finds
the use of V1 in past tense 86%. The researcher also finds that psychological,
linguistic competence, and sociology influence the sistematicities of student’s
products.
Keyword: systematicity, Interlanguage, Foreign Learning Language
xiv