Gambaran Morfologi Sagital Skeletal Wajah Berdasarkan Analisis Steiner dan Jefferson
36
DAFTAR PUSTAKA
1. Cobourne MT, Dibiase AT. Handbook of orthodontics. 1 st ed., Philadelphia:
Elvesier., 2010: 133, 153, 157, 167-8.
2. Dika DD, Hamid T, Sylvia M. Penggunaan index of orthodontic treatment
(IOTN) sebagai evaluasi hasil perawatan dengan piranti lepas. Orthodontic
Dental Journal 2011; 2: 45-8.
3. Mokhtar
M.
Dasar-dasar
ortodonti
perkembangan
dan
pertumbuhan
kraniodentofasial. Ed 1., Jakarta: IDI., 1998.
4. Loi H, Nakata S, Nakasima A, Counts A. Effect of facial convexity on anteroposterior lip positions of the most favored japanese facial profiles. Angle Orthod
2005; 75: 326-31.
5. English JD, Peltomaki T, Litschel KP. Mosby’s orthodontic review.
Philadelphia: elvasier., 2010: 27-8, 37-7, 57-8.
6. Arat ZM, Rubenduz M, Akgul AA. The displacement of craniofacial reference
landmarks during puberty: a comparison of three superimposition methods.
Angle Orthod 2003; 73: 374-9.
7. Jefferson Y. Skeletal types: key to unraveling yhe mystery of facial beauty and
its biologic signifience. JGO 1996; 7: 7-23.
8. Jefferson Y. Facial beauty-establishing a universal standard. IJO 2004; 15: 9-20.
9. Matoula S, Pancherz H. Skeletofacial morphology of attractive and
nonattractive faces. Angle Orthod 2006; 76: 204-9.
10. Oh KM, Hong JS, Kim YJ, Cevidanes LSH, Park YH. Three- dimensional
analysis of pharyngeal airway form in children with anteroposterior facial
patterns. Angle Orthod 2011; 81: 1075-81.
11. Senna A, Abbenante D, Tremolizzo L, Campus G, Strohmenger L. The
relationship between facial skeletal class and expert-rated interpersonal skill: an
epidemiological survey on young italian adults. BMC Psychiatry 2006: 1-6.
Universitas Sumatera Utara
37
12. Al-Jasser NM. Cephalometric evaluation for saudi population using the downs
and steiner analysis. J Contemp Dent Pract 2005; 6: 1-7.
13. Abdullah RTH, Kuijpers MAR, Berge SJ, atsaros C. Steiner cephalometric
analysis: predicted and actual treatment outcome compared. Orthod Craniofac
Res 2006; 9: 77-83.
14. Al-Jasser NM. Cephalometric evaluation of craniofacial variation in normal
saudi population according to steiner analysis. Saudi Med J 2000; 21: 746-50.
15. Proffit WR, Fields HW, Sarver DM. Contemporary orthodontics. 4 th ed.,
Philadelphia; Elvisier., 2007: 201-4.
16. Athanasiou AE. Orthodontic cephalometry. 1 st ed., Philadelphia; MosbyWolfe., 1995: 9-10, 73, 240, 280.
17. Bhalajhi SI. Orthodontics the art and science. 3 rd ed., New Delhi; Arya
(MEDI) Publishing House., 2004: 63-9, 82.
18. Singh G. Textbook of orthodontics. 2 nd ed., New Delhi; Jaypee., 2007: 159-63,
175-7.
19. Allen D, Rebellato J, Sheats R, Ceron AM. Skeletal and dental contributions to
posterior crossbites. Angle Orthod 2003; 73: 515-7.
20. Rahardjo P. Diagnosis ortodontik. Ed 1., Surabaya; Airlangga University Press.,
2008: 71-3
21. Altemus LA. A comparison of cephalofacial relationships.
Thesis:
Pennyslvania: Howard University, 1960: 30: 223-39.
22. Wahl N. Orthodontics in 3 millenia. Chapter 8: the cephalometer takes its place
in the orthodontic armamenterium. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2006; 129:
574-80.
23. Irawani CY. Perbandingan kompleksitas klas I, II, dan III pada pasien di klinik
ortodonsia rumah sakit gigi dan mulut pendidikan fkg usu dengan menggunakan
metode discrepancy index. Tesis. Medan: Pendidikan Dokter Gigi Spesialis
Ortodonsia FKG USU, 2009: 1-3.
Universitas Sumatera Utara
38
24. Kanno Z, Kim Y, Soma K. Early correction of a developing skeletal class III
malocclusion. Angle Orthod 2007; 77: 549-56.
25. Elfiah U. Variasi antropometri, wajah indonesia dan sefalometri sebagai data
dasar pada rekonstruksi trauma maksilofasial. Journal of Emergency 2011; 1: 612.
26. Premkumar S. Orthodontics prep manual for undergraduates. New Delhi,
Elsevier: Mosby., 2008: 523.
27. Toma RR, Al-Mothaffar A. The morphology and texture of iraqi skeletal class
II young adults (cephalometric study). J Bagh College Dentistry 2011; 23: 13740.
28. Emral E, Oz U, Altug AT. Comparison of class III malocclusion subgroup with
different skeletal components. Cdr 2012; 36: 22-8.
29. Sudarso IWR. Masalah dan solusi kedokteran gigi anak dalam tindak ortodonti
di era globalisasi. Universitas Gajah Mada, 2003: 8-9.
Universitas Sumatera Utara
DAFTAR PUSTAKA
1. Cobourne MT, Dibiase AT. Handbook of orthodontics. 1 st ed., Philadelphia:
Elvesier., 2010: 133, 153, 157, 167-8.
2. Dika DD, Hamid T, Sylvia M. Penggunaan index of orthodontic treatment
(IOTN) sebagai evaluasi hasil perawatan dengan piranti lepas. Orthodontic
Dental Journal 2011; 2: 45-8.
3. Mokhtar
M.
Dasar-dasar
ortodonti
perkembangan
dan
pertumbuhan
kraniodentofasial. Ed 1., Jakarta: IDI., 1998.
4. Loi H, Nakata S, Nakasima A, Counts A. Effect of facial convexity on anteroposterior lip positions of the most favored japanese facial profiles. Angle Orthod
2005; 75: 326-31.
5. English JD, Peltomaki T, Litschel KP. Mosby’s orthodontic review.
Philadelphia: elvasier., 2010: 27-8, 37-7, 57-8.
6. Arat ZM, Rubenduz M, Akgul AA. The displacement of craniofacial reference
landmarks during puberty: a comparison of three superimposition methods.
Angle Orthod 2003; 73: 374-9.
7. Jefferson Y. Skeletal types: key to unraveling yhe mystery of facial beauty and
its biologic signifience. JGO 1996; 7: 7-23.
8. Jefferson Y. Facial beauty-establishing a universal standard. IJO 2004; 15: 9-20.
9. Matoula S, Pancherz H. Skeletofacial morphology of attractive and
nonattractive faces. Angle Orthod 2006; 76: 204-9.
10. Oh KM, Hong JS, Kim YJ, Cevidanes LSH, Park YH. Three- dimensional
analysis of pharyngeal airway form in children with anteroposterior facial
patterns. Angle Orthod 2011; 81: 1075-81.
11. Senna A, Abbenante D, Tremolizzo L, Campus G, Strohmenger L. The
relationship between facial skeletal class and expert-rated interpersonal skill: an
epidemiological survey on young italian adults. BMC Psychiatry 2006: 1-6.
Universitas Sumatera Utara
37
12. Al-Jasser NM. Cephalometric evaluation for saudi population using the downs
and steiner analysis. J Contemp Dent Pract 2005; 6: 1-7.
13. Abdullah RTH, Kuijpers MAR, Berge SJ, atsaros C. Steiner cephalometric
analysis: predicted and actual treatment outcome compared. Orthod Craniofac
Res 2006; 9: 77-83.
14. Al-Jasser NM. Cephalometric evaluation of craniofacial variation in normal
saudi population according to steiner analysis. Saudi Med J 2000; 21: 746-50.
15. Proffit WR, Fields HW, Sarver DM. Contemporary orthodontics. 4 th ed.,
Philadelphia; Elvisier., 2007: 201-4.
16. Athanasiou AE. Orthodontic cephalometry. 1 st ed., Philadelphia; MosbyWolfe., 1995: 9-10, 73, 240, 280.
17. Bhalajhi SI. Orthodontics the art and science. 3 rd ed., New Delhi; Arya
(MEDI) Publishing House., 2004: 63-9, 82.
18. Singh G. Textbook of orthodontics. 2 nd ed., New Delhi; Jaypee., 2007: 159-63,
175-7.
19. Allen D, Rebellato J, Sheats R, Ceron AM. Skeletal and dental contributions to
posterior crossbites. Angle Orthod 2003; 73: 515-7.
20. Rahardjo P. Diagnosis ortodontik. Ed 1., Surabaya; Airlangga University Press.,
2008: 71-3
21. Altemus LA. A comparison of cephalofacial relationships.
Thesis:
Pennyslvania: Howard University, 1960: 30: 223-39.
22. Wahl N. Orthodontics in 3 millenia. Chapter 8: the cephalometer takes its place
in the orthodontic armamenterium. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2006; 129:
574-80.
23. Irawani CY. Perbandingan kompleksitas klas I, II, dan III pada pasien di klinik
ortodonsia rumah sakit gigi dan mulut pendidikan fkg usu dengan menggunakan
metode discrepancy index. Tesis. Medan: Pendidikan Dokter Gigi Spesialis
Ortodonsia FKG USU, 2009: 1-3.
Universitas Sumatera Utara
38
24. Kanno Z, Kim Y, Soma K. Early correction of a developing skeletal class III
malocclusion. Angle Orthod 2007; 77: 549-56.
25. Elfiah U. Variasi antropometri, wajah indonesia dan sefalometri sebagai data
dasar pada rekonstruksi trauma maksilofasial. Journal of Emergency 2011; 1: 612.
26. Premkumar S. Orthodontics prep manual for undergraduates. New Delhi,
Elsevier: Mosby., 2008: 523.
27. Toma RR, Al-Mothaffar A. The morphology and texture of iraqi skeletal class
II young adults (cephalometric study). J Bagh College Dentistry 2011; 23: 13740.
28. Emral E, Oz U, Altug AT. Comparison of class III malocclusion subgroup with
different skeletal components. Cdr 2012; 36: 22-8.
29. Sudarso IWR. Masalah dan solusi kedokteran gigi anak dalam tindak ortodonti
di era globalisasi. Universitas Gajah Mada, 2003: 8-9.
Universitas Sumatera Utara