Astri N. Napitupulu 22010112120018 Lap.KTI Bab7

DAFTAR PUSTAKA

1. Gebreabiezgi Teklebirhan,

Adane Bitew. Prevalence of Dermatophytic

Infection and the Spectrum of Dermatophytes in Patients Attending a Tertiary
Hospital in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. International Journal of Microbiology.
2015.
2. Maria da Gloria, Santana GB, Criado PR, et al. Chronic widespread
dermatophytosis due to Trichophyton rubrum: a syndrome associated with a
Trichophyton-specific functional defect of phagocytes. Front Microbiol.2015.

3. Hidayati Afif Nurul, dkk. Mikosis Superfisialis di Divisi Mikologi Unit Rawat
Jalan Penyakit Kulit dan Kelamin RSUD Dr. Soetomo Surabaya Tahun 20032005.Berkala Ilmu Kesehatan Kulit dan Kelamin. 2009.
4. Havlickova Blanka, A.Czaika Victor, Friedrich markus. Epidemiological
trends in skin mycoses worldwide. Blackwell publishing Ltd Mycoses. 2008
5. Ilkit M, Durdu M. Tinea pedis: the etiology and global epidemiology of a
common fungal infection. Critical Riviews in Microbiology. 2015.
6. Bell-Syer SE, Khan SM. Torgerson DJ. Oral treatments for fungal infections of
the skin of the foot. 2012

7. Perdoski. Dermatofitosis Superfisialis. Jakarta: balai penerbit FKUI 2001
8. http://emedicine.medscape.com/article/1091684-overview#a6
November 2015

46

Akses

29

47

9. Vikas Kumar, Ragini Tilak1, Pradyot Prakash, Chaitanya Nigam, Richa Gupta.
Asian Journal of Medical Sciences 2 (2011) 134-138 Tinea Pedis–an Update
10. http://www.jamaicaobserver.com/magazines/allwoman/Myths-surroundingathlete-s-foot-_16490106 Akses 20 Januari
11. Wolff Klaus Fitzpatrick’s Dermatology In General Medicine Seventh Edition
Volume Two . New York: Mc Graw Hill Medical,2008.
12. http://www.bpac.org.nz/BPJ/2014/December/docs/BPJ65-tinea-pedis.pdf
Akses 30 November
13. http://www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-conditions/athletesfoot/basics/definition/con-20014892 Akses 30 November

14. .http://www.dermnetnz.org/fungal/tinea-pedis.html Akses 1Desember
15. Gino A Epidemiology of dermatophytoses: retrospective analysis from 2005
to

2010

and

comparison

with

previous

data

from

1975.


NEWMICROBIOLOGICA, 35, 207-213, 2012
16. Burns Toni, et al. Rook’s Textbook of Dermatology Volume 2.Wiley
Blackwell ;2012
17. Carlo CJ, Bowe MD. Tinea Pedis (Athlete’s Foot) [pamphlet]. (USA); 2012.
18. http://repository.usu.ac.id/bitstream/123456789/17887/5/Chapter%20I.pdf
Akses 30 November
19. H.S. Djajoesman. Polisi Lalu Lintas. Jakarta :Dinas Hukum Polri.1976

48

20. W.J.S Poerwadarmita.Kamus Umum Bahasa Indonesia.Jakarta: Balai Pustaka.
1996
21. Djajusman H.S. Polisi dan Lalu Lintas. Bandung: Mabak. 1976 :8
22. Elder, David. Lever’s Histopathology of The Skin Tenth Edition.
Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins,2009.
23. Wolff, klaus. Fitzpatrick’s Color Atlas and Synopsis of Clinical Dermatology
Seventh Edition. New York: Mc. Graw Hill,2013
24. Zhou Z, Liu T, Zhang Z. Skin Disease in United Nations Peacekeepers in
Lebanon. J. R. Army Med Corps. 2016
25. Baihaqy Muhammad. Prevalensi dan Faktor Risiko Terjadinya Tinea Pedis

pada Pekerja Pabrik Tekstil. Semarang : Universitas Diponegoro; 2014
26. Mustofa Ahmad. Prevalensi dan Faktor Risiko Terjadinya Pityriasis
Versicolor pada Polisi Lalu Lintas Kota Semarang. Semarang : Universitas
Diponegoro ; 2014
27. Matricciani Lisa, Jones Sara. Treating Tinea Pedis in Patients with Diabetes.
Podiatry Today. 2012

49

Lampiran 1. Ethical Clearance

50

Lampiran 2. Informed Consent

51

52

Lampiran 3. Kuesioner penelitian


KUESIONER PENELITIAN
HIGIENE PERORANGAN TERHADAP
TINEA PEDIS
Keterangan Responden
1. Nomor

:

2. Tanggal pemeriksaan

:

3. Petugas pemeriksa

:

Identitas Responden
1. Nama


:

2. Jenis Kelamin

:

3. Umur

:

4. Pangkat

:

5. Satuan Kepolisian

:

6. Mulai bekerja di kepolisian


:

7. Nomer HP

:

8. Apakah anda pernah mendapatkan terapi tinea pedis (kutu air) pada 1
bulan terakhir?
a. Ya
b. Tidak
Petunjuk Pengisian : Berilah tanda silang (X) pada jawaban yang anda pilih
I. Kebersian Umum
1. Berapa kali anda mandi setiap harinya?

Skor

a. Dua kali atau lebih

(1)


b. Satu kali

(0)

53

2. Apakah anda mandi selalu memakai sabun mandi?
a. Ya

(1)

b. Tidak

(0)

3. Apakah sabun yang anda gunakan adalah sabun antiseptik?
a. Ya

(1)


b. Tidak

(0)

4. Bagaimana penggunaan handuk yang anda pakai?
a. Digunakan sendiri

(1)

b. Digunakan untuk banyak orang/bergantian

(0)

5. Berapa seringkah anda mengganti handuk anda?
a. 3 hari sekali

(1)

b. 5 hari sekali


(0)

6. Apakah anda mencuci kaki dan mengeringkannya setelah beraktivitas?
a. Ya

(1)

b. Tidak

(0)

7. Apakah saat mandi anda menggosok dan membersihkan sela-sela jari kaki,
tumit, dan area kaki?
a. Ya

(1)

b. Tidak

(0)


II. Kebersihan yang terkait pekerjaan
1. Berapa seringkah anda mengganti kaos kaki anda?
a. Setiap hari

(1)

b. Dua hari sekali atau lebih

(0)

2. Jika sepatu dan kaos kaki anda tidak langsung dicuci, bagaimanakah anda
menyimpan benda tersebut?
a. Diletakkan di tempat yang terkena sinar matahari langsung

(1)

b. Diletakkan di tempat yang tidak terkena sinar matahari

(0)

3. Berapa jam dalam sehari anda memakai sepatu?
a. Kurang dari 8 jam

(1)

b. Lebih dari 8 jam

(0)

54

III. Durasi mengatur lalu lintas
1. Berapa lama durasi anda mengatur lalu lintas?
a. < 4 jam

(1)

b. > 4 jam

(0)

55

Lampiran 4. Hasil Analisis
Analisis Univariat
1.

ROC Umur

56

Coordi nates of the Curve
Test Result Variable(s): Umur
Positiv e if
Greater Than
a
or Equal To
20.00
22.00
25.00
27.50
28.50
29.50
30.50
31.50
32.50
34.00
36.00
38.50
40.50
41.50
43.00
44.50
45.50
47.00
49.00
51.00
52.50
54.00
56.00

Sensitiv ity
1.000
1.000
1.000
.958
.833
.792
.625
.625
.583
.458
.417
.333
.333
.292
.250
.208
.208
.208
.167
.125
.083
.042
.000

1 - Specif icity
1.000
.824
.765
.765
.706
.647
.647
.529
.412
.412
.412
.412
.353
.294
.235
.235
.176
.118
.118
.118
.059
.000
.000

The test result v ariable(s): Umur has at least one tie
between t he posit iv e actual state group and t he negat iv e
actual state group.
a. The smallest cutof f v alue is the minimum
observ ed t est v alue minus 1, and the largest cutof f
v alue is the maximum observ ed test v alue plus 1.
All the other cutof f v alues are t he av erages of two
consecutiv e ordered observ ed test v alues.

57

2.

ROC Lama masa bekerja

58

Coordi nates of the Curve
Test Result Variable(s): Lama bekerja
Positiv e if
Greater Than
a
or Equal To
.00
1.50
2.50
6.00
9.50
10.50
11.50
12.50
13.50
15.00
16.50
18.00
19.50
21.00
22.50
23.50
25.00
27.00
28.50
30.50
32.50
33.50
35.00

Sensitiv ity
1.000
1.000
1.000
1.000
.917
.833
.708
.583
.542
.458
.417
.333
.333
.292
.167
.125
.125
.125
.083
.083
.042
.042
.000

1 - Specif icity
1.000
.882
.824
.765
.706
.647
.588
.471
.412
.412
.412
.412
.294
.294
.294
.294
.235
.118
.118
.059
.059
.000
.000

The test result v ariable(s): Lama bekerja has at least one
tie between the posit iv e actual state group and t he
negativ e actual state group.
a. The smallest cutof f v alue is the minimum
observ ed t est v alue minus 1, and the largest cutof f
v alue is the maximum observ ed test v alue plus 1.
All the other cutof f v alues are t he av erages of two
consecutiv e ordered observ ed test v alues.

59

3.

ROC Higiene

Coordi nates of the Curve
Test Result Variable(s): HIgiena
Positiv e if
Greater Than
a
or Equal To
2.00
3.50
4.50
5.50
6.50
7.50
8.50
9.50
11.00

Sensitiv ity
1.000
.958
.958
.917
.833
.583
.333
.125
.000

1 - Specif icity
1.000
1.000
.882
.824
.647
.294
.176
.000
.000

The test result v ariable(s): HIgiena has at least one tie
between t he posit iv e actual state group and t he negat iv e
actual state group.
a. The smallest cutof f v alue is the minimum
observ ed t est v alue minus 1, and the largest cutof f
v alue is the maximum observ ed test v alue plus 1.
All the other cutof f v alues are t he av erages of two
consecutiv e ordered observ ed test v alues.

60

Analisis Bivariat
1. Kategori Lama bekerja
Crosstab

Lama bekerja

= 6

Total

Count
Expected Count
% wit hin Tinea pedis
Count
Expected Count
% wit hin Tinea pedis
Count
Expected Count
% wit hin Tinea pedis

Tinea pedis
positif
negatif
4
0
1.7
2.3
23.5%
.0%
13
24
15.3
21.7
76.5%
100.0%
17
24
17.0
24.0
100.0%
100.0%

Total
4
4.0
9.8%
37
37.0
90.2%
41
41.0
100.0%

Chi-Square Tests

Pearson Chi-Square
Continuity Correctiona
Likelihood Ratio
Fisher's Exact Test
Linear-by -Linear
Association
N of Valid Cases

Value
6.258b
3.870
7.664

df
1
1
1

6.105

Asy mp. Sig.
(2-sided)
.012
.049
.006

1

Exact Sig.
(2-sided)

Exact Sig.
(1-sided)

.024

.024

.013

41

a. Computed only f or a 2x2 table
b. 2 cells (50.0%) hav e expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 1.
66.

Risk Estimate

Value
For cohort Tinea
pedis = positif
N of Valid Cases

2.846
41

95% Conf idence
Interv al
Lower
Upper
1.837

4.410

61

2. Kategori durasi mengatur lalu lintas
Crosstab

Durasi mengatur
lalu lintas

< 4 jam

>= 4 jam

Total

Count
Expected Count
% wit hin Tinea pedis
Count
Expected Count
% wit hin Tinea pedis
Count
Expected Count
% wit hin Tinea pedis

Tinea pedis
positif
negatif
10
11
8.7
12.3
58.8%
45.8%
7
13
8.3
11.7
41.2%
54.2%
17
24
17.0
24.0
100.0%
100.0%

Total
21
21.0
51.2%
20
20.0
48.8%
41
41.0
100.0%

Chi-Square Tests
Value
.672b
.253
.675

Pearson Chi-Square
Continuity Correctiona
Likelihood Ratio
Fisher's Exact Test
Linear-by -Linear
Association
N of Valid Cases

.656

df
1
1
1

1

Asy mp. Sig.
(2-sided)
.412
.615
.411

Exact Sig.
(2-sided)

Exact Sig.
(1-sided)

.530

.308

.418

41

a. Computed only f or a 2x2 table
b. 0 cells (.0%) hav e expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 8.
29.

Risk Esti mate

Value
Odds Rat io f or Durasi
mengatur lalu lintas (<
4 jam / >= 4 jam)
For cohort Tinea pedis
= positif
For cohort Tinea pedis
= negatif
N of Valid Cases

3. Kategori higiena

95% Conf idence
Interv al
Lower
Upper

1.688

.481

5.929

1.361

.645

2.871

.806

.479

1.355

41

62

Crosstab

HIgiena

< 7,5

>= 7,5

Total

Tinea pedis
positif
negatif
12
10
9.1
12.9
70.6%
41.7%
5
14
7.9
11.1
29.4%
58.3%
17
24
17.0
24.0
100.0%
100.0%

Count
Expected Count
% wit hin Tinea pedis
Count
Expected Count
% wit hin Tinea pedis
Count
Expected Count
% wit hin Tinea pedis

Total
22
22.0
53.7%
19
19.0
46.3%
41
41.0
100.0%

Chi-Square Tests

Pearson Chi-Square
Continuity Correctiona
Likelihood Ratio
Fisher's Exact Test
Linear-by -Linear
Association
N of Valid Cases

Value
3.347b
2.285
3.420

3.266

df
1
1
1

1

Asy mp. Sig.
(2-sided)
.067
.131
.064

Exact Sig.
(2-sided)

Exact Sig.
(1-sided)

.112

.065

.071

41

a. Computed only f or a 2x2 table
b. 0 cells (.0%) hav e expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 7.
88.

63

Risk Esti mate
95% Conf idence
Interv al
Lower
Upper

Value
Odds Rat io f or HIgiena
(< 7,5 / >= 7,5)
For cohort Tinea pedis
= positif
For cohort Tinea pedis
= negatif
N of Valid Cases

3.360

.896

12.600

2.073

.892

4.818

.617

.363

1.049

41

Kategori penggunaan sabun anti septik

Crosstab

sabun antiseptik

Tidak
Ya

Total

Count
% wit hin Tinea pedis
Count
% wit hin Tinea pedis
Count
% wit hin Tinea pedis

Tinea pedis
positif
negatif
8
2
47.1%
8.3%
9
22
52.9%
91.7%
17
24
100.0%
100.0%

Total
10
24.4%
31
75.6%
41
100.0%

Chi-Square Tests

Pearson Chi-Square
Continuity Correctiona
Likelihood Ratio
Fisher's Exact Test
Linear-by -Linear
Association
N of Valid Cases

Value
8.092b
6.129
8.278

7.895

df
1
1
1

1

Asy mp. Sig.
(2-sided)
.004
.013
.004

Exact Sig.
(2-sided)

Exact Sig.
(1-sided)

.008

.007

.005

41

a. Computed only f or a 2x2 table
b. 1 cells (25.0%) hav e expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 4.
15.

64

Risk Esti mate
95% Conf idence
Interv al
Lower
Upper

Value
Odds Rat io f or sabun
antiseptik (Tidak / Ya)
For cohort Tinea pedis
= positif
For cohort Tinea pedis
= negatif
N of Valid Cases

9.778

1.729

55.304

2.756

1.465

5.182

.282

.080

.993

41

Kategori penggunaan handuk
Crosstab

pemggunaan
handuk

digunakan bany ak orang
digunakan sendiri

Total

Count
% wit hin Tinea pedis
Count
% wit hin Tinea pedis
Count
% wit hin Tinea pedis

Tinea pedis
positif
negatif
2
0
11.8%
.0%
15
24
88.2%
100.0%
17
24
100.0%
100.0%

Total
2
4.9%
39
95.1%
41
100.0%

Chi-Square Tests

Pearson Chi-Square
Continuity Correctiona
Likelihood Ratio
Fisher's Exact Test
Linear-by -Linear
Association
N of Valid Cases

Value
2.968b
.974
3.667

2.896

df
1
1
1

1

Asy mp. Sig.
(2-sided)
.085
.324
.055

Exact Sig.
(2-sided)

Exact Sig.
(1-sided)

.166

.166

.089

41

a. Computed only f or a 2x2 table
b. 2 cells (50.0%) hav e expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is .
83.

65

Risk Estimate
95% Conf idence
Interv al
Lower
Upper

Value
For cohort Tinea
pedis = positif
N of Valid Cases

2.600

1.748

3.867

41

Kategori frekuensi mengganti handuk
Crosstab

mengganti
handuk

5 hari sekali
3 hari sekali

Total

Count
% wit hin Tinea pedis
Count
% wit hin Tinea pedis
Count
% wit hin Tinea pedis

Tinea pedis
positif
negatif
9
10
52.9%
41.7%
8
14
47.1%
58.3%
17
24
100.0%
100.0%

Total
19
46.3%
22
53.7%
41
100.0%

Chi-Square Tests

Pearson Chi-Square
Continuity Correctiona
Likelihood Ratio
Fisher's Exact Test
Linear-by -Linear
Association
N of Valid Cases

Value
.509b
.156
.509

.496

df
1
1
1

1

Asy mp. Sig.
(2-sided)
.476
.693
.476

Exact Sig.
(2-sided)

Exact Sig.
(1-sided)

.537

.346

.481

41

a. Computed only f or a 2x2 table
b. 0 cells (.0%) hav e expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 7.
88.

66

Risk Esti mate
95% Conf idence
Interv al
Lower
Upper

Value
Odds Rat io f or mengganti
handuk (5 hari sekali / 3
hari sekali)
For cohort Tinea pedis =
positif
For cohort Tinea pedis =
negatif
N of Valid Cases

1.575

.451

5.504

1.303

.629

2.698

.827

.486

1.406

41

Kategori mencuci kaki setelah aktivitas
Crosstab

mencuci
kaki

Tidak
Ya

Total

Count
% wit hin Tinea pedis
Count
% wit hin Tinea pedis
Count
% wit hin Tinea pedis

Tinea pedis
positif
negatif
3
6
17.6%
25.0%
14
18
82.4%
75.0%
17
24
100.0%
100.0%

Total
9
22.0%
32
78.0%
41
100.0%

Chi-Square Tests

Pearson Chi-Square
Continuity Correctiona
Likelihood Ratio
Fisher's Exact Test
Linear-by -Linear
Association
N of Valid Cases

Value
.314b
.031
.320

.306

df
1
1
1

1

Asy mp. Sig.
(2-sided)
.575
.859
.572

Exact Sig.
(2-sided)

Exact Sig.
(1-sided)

.711

.435

.580

41

a. Computed only f or a 2x2 table
b. 1 cells (25.0%) hav e expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 3.
73.

67

Risk Esti mate
95% Conf idence
Interv al
Lower
Upper

Value
Odds Rat io f or mencuci
kaki (Tidak / Y a)
For cohort Tinea pedis
= positif
For cohort Tinea pedis
= negatif
N of Valid Cases

.643

.136

3.035

.762

.279

2.079

1.185

.681

2.062

41

Kategori menggosok dan membersihkan daerah kaki
Crosstab

membersihkan
daerah kaki

Tidak
Ya

Total

Count
% wit hin Tinea pedis
Count
% wit hin Tinea pedis
Count
% wit hin Tinea pedis

Tinea pedis
positif
negatif
3
3
17.6%
12.5%
14
21
82.4%
87.5%
17
24
100.0%
100.0%

Total
6
14.6%
35
85.4%
41
100.0%

Chi-Square Tests

Pearson Chi-Square
Continuity Correctiona
Likelihood Ratio
Fisher's Exact Test
Linear-by -Linear
Association
N of Valid Cases

Value
.211b
.000
.208

.206

df
1
1
1

1

Asy mp. Sig.
(2-sided)
.646
.991
.648

Exact Sig.
(2-sided)

Exact Sig.
(1-sided)

.679

.488

.650

41

a. Computed only f or a 2x2 table
b. 2 cells (50.0%) hav e expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 2.
49.

68

Risk Esti mate
95% Conf idence
Interv al
Lower
Upper

Value
Odds Rat io f or
membersihkan daerah
kaki (Tidak / Y a)
For cohort Tinea pedis
= positif
For cohort Tinea pedis
= negatif
N of Valid Cases

1.500

.264

8.523

1.250

.510

3.066

.833

.358

1.939

41

Kategori mengganti kaos kaki
Crosstab

f rekuensi ganti
kaos kaki

2 hari sekali atau lebih
setiap hari

Total

Count
% wit hin Tinea pedis
Count
% wit hin Tinea pedis
Count
% wit hin Tinea pedis

Tinea pedis
positif
negatif
11
10
64.7%
41.7%
6
14
35.3%
58.3%
17
24
100.0%
100.0%

Total
21
51.2%
20
48.8%
41
100.0%

Chi-Square Tests

Pearson Chi-Square
Continuity Correctiona
Likelihood Ratio
Fisher's Exact Test
Linear-by -Linear
Association
N of Valid Cases

Value
2.114b
1.293
2.138

2.063

df
1
1
1

1

Asy mp. Sig.
(2-sided)
.146
.256
.144

Exact Sig.
(2-sided)

Exact Sig.
(1-sided)

.208

.128

.151

41

a. Computed only f or a 2x2 table
b. 0 cells (.0%) hav e expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 8.
29.

69

Risk Esti mate
95% Conf idence
Interv al
Lower
Upper

Value
Odds Rat io f or
f rekuensi ganti kaos
kaki (2 hari sekali atau
lebih / setiap hari)
For cohort Tinea pedis
= positif
For cohort Tinea pedis
= negatif
N of Valid Cases

2.567

.711

9.266

1.746

.797

3.824

.680

.399

1.159

41

Kategori penyimpanan sepatu
Crosstab

peny impanan
sepatu

tidak terkena sinar
matahari

Count
% wit hin Tinea pedis
Count
% wit hin Tinea pedis
Count
% wit hin Tinea pedis

terkena sinar matahari
Total

Tinea pedis
positif
negatif
5
11
29.4%
45.8%
12
13
70.6%
54.2%
17
24
100.0%
100.0%

Total
16
39.0%
25
61.0%
41
100.0%

Chi-Square Tests

Pearson Chi-Square
Continuity Correctiona
Likelihood Ratio
Fisher's Exact Test
Linear-by -Linear
Association
N of Valid Cases

Value
1.128b
.543
1.145

1.100

df
1
1
1

1

Asy mp. Sig.
(2-sided)
.288
.461
.285

Exact Sig.
(2-sided)

Exact Sig.
(1-sided)

.344

.232

.294

41

a. Computed only f or a 2x2 table
b. 0 cells (.0%) hav e expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 6.
63.

70

Risk Esti mate
95% Conf idence
Interv al
Lower
Upper

Value
Odds Rat io f or
peny impanan sepatu
(tidak terkena sinar
matahari / t erkena
sinar matahari)
For cohort Tinea
pedis = posit if
For cohort Tinea
pedis = negatif
N of Valid Cases

.492

.132

1.837

.651

.283

1.498

1.322

.801

2.182

41

Kategori lama memakai sepatu
Crosstab

lama memakai
sepatu

> 8 jam
< 8 jam

Total

Tinea pedis
positif
negatif
17
21
100.0%
87.5%
0
3
.0%
12.5%
17
24
100.0%
100.0%

Count
% wit hin Tinea pedis
Count
% wit hin Tinea pedis
Count
% wit hin Tinea pedis

Total
38
92.7%
3
7.3%
41
100.0%

Chi-Square Tests

Pearson Chi-Square
Continuity Correctiona
Likelihood Ratio
Fisher's Exact Test
Linear-by -Linear
Association
N of Valid Cases

Value
2.293b
.820
3.380

2.237

df
1
1
1

1

Asy mp. Sig.
(2-sided)
.130
.365
.066

Exact Sig.
(2-sided)

Exact Sig.
(1-sided)

.254

.190

.135

41

a. Computed only f or a 2x2 table
b. 2 cells (50.0%) hav e expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 1.
24.

71

Risk Estimate

Value
For cohort Tinea
pedis = negat if
N of Valid Cases

.553
41

95% Conf idence
Interv al
Lower
Upper
.415

.736

72

Lampiran 5. Dokumentasi penelitian

73

Lampiran 6
BIODATA MAHASISWA

Nama

: Astri N Napitupulu

NIM

: 22010112120018

Tempat/tanggal lahir : 25 Desember 1993
Jenis kelamin

: Perempuan

Alamat

: Jl. Timoho Barat I No 10A Semarang

No. HP

: 085361178522

E-mail

: astrinatalia70@gmail.com

Riwayat Pendidikan Formal
1. SD

: SD Sanfrancesco Balige

2. SMP

: SMP Budhi Dharma Balige Lulus tahun : 2009

3. SMA

: SMAN 2 Balige

4. FK Universitas Diponegoro

Lulus tahun : 2006

Lulus tahun : 2012
Masuk tahun : 2012