S BIO 1004544 Bibliography
77
DAFTAR PUSTAKA
Acar, O, Turkmen, L dan Roychoudhury, A. (2009). Student Difficulties in
Socio-scientific Argumentation and Decision-making Research Findings:
Crossing the borders of two research lines. International Journal of
Science Education.32 (1),pp 1191-1206.
Arikunto. (2006). Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktik, Edisi Revisi VI.
Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Bell, P., dan Linn, M. C. (2007) Scientific argument as learning artifact:
Designning for learning from the web with KIE. International Journal of
Science Education,22(8), 797-817.
Berland, L.K . (2009). Using A Learning Progression To Inform Scientific
Argumentation In Talk And Writing. Paper presented at the Learning
Progressions in Science (LeaPS) Conference. Iowa City, IA. University of
Texas at Austin.
Campbell, Reece, J.B., Urry.L.A., Wasserman, S.A., Minorsky, P.V., dan
Jackson, R.B. (2011). Biologi Ninth Edition. United States of America:
Pearson.
Campbell, Reece, J.B., Urry.L.A., Wasserman, S.A., Minorsky, P.V., dan
Jackson, R.B. (2010). Biologi Edisi Kedelapan Jilid 3. Jakarta: Penerbit
Erlangga
Dahar, R.W. (1996). Teori - Teori Belajar. Jakarta: Erlangga.
Dinas Pendidikan Nasional. (2013). Kurikulum 2013 Kompetensi Dasar Sekolah
Menengah Atas (SMA)/ Madrasah Aliyah (MA). Dinas Pendidikan
Nasional.
Duschl, R.A., Osborne, J. (2002). Supporting and Promoting Argumentation
Discourse in Science Education. Studies in Science Education. 38(1). 3972.
Eemeren, V., Grootendorst, R., Henkemans, A. (2002). Argumentation Analysis,
Evaluation, Presentations. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
Publisher.
Yuni Anggia Purnama, 2014
Analisis Kualitas Argumentasi Siswa Pada Pembelajaran Menggunakan Media Kartun
Konsep Sistem Imunitas
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu | perpustakaan.upi.edu
78
Eggert. S, Ostermeyer. F, Hasselhorn. M, dan Bögeholz. S. (2013). Socioscientifc
Decision Making in the Science Classroom: The Effect of Embedded
Metacognitive Instructions on Students’ Learning Outcomes. Education
Research International..
Ekici, F., Ekici, E. dan Aydin, F. (2007). Utility of Concept Cartoons in
Diagnosing and Overcoming Misconceptions Related to Photosynthesis.
International Journal of Environmental & Science Education, 2(4), 111 –
124.
Erduran, S., Shirley, S., dan J. Osborne. (2004). TAPping into argumentation:
Developments in the application of Toulmin’s Argument Pattern for
studying science discourse. Science Education, 88, 915-933 [Online].
Tersedia : http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/sce.20012/pdf
(Diakses 21 Januari 2014)
Fardhani, Indra. (2011). Analisis Kualitas Argumentasi Siswa Kelas VII SMP
pada Materi Ekosistem dengan Metode Debat. Skripsi Sarjana Pendidikan
Biologi UPI Bandung: tidak diterbitkan.
Kabapinar, F. (2005). Effectiveness of Teaching via Concept Cartoons from the
Point of View of Constructivist Approach. Educational Sciences: Theory
& Practice, 5 (1), 135-146.
Kabapinar, F. (2009). What Makes Concept Cartoons More Effective? Using
Research to Inform Practice. Education and Scienc, 34(154), 104-118.
Keogh, B dan Naylor, S. (1999) Concept cartoons, teaching and learning in
science: an evaluation. International Journal of Science Education, 21 (4),
431-446.
Kurnadi, K.A. (2011). Dasar-Dasar Anatomi dan Fisiologi Manusia Buku 2.
Bandung: Jurusan Pendidikan Biologi FPMIPA UPI.
Liston, Maeve. (2011). Using Concept Cartoons in the Junior Certificate Science
Classroom. National Centre for Excellence in Mathematics and Science
Teacing and Learning, 2(12).
Manurung, S.R dan Rustaman, N. (2012). Identifikasi Keterampilan Argumentasi
melalui Analisis “Toulmin Argumentation Pattern (TAP)” Pada Topik
Kinematik Bagi Mahasiswa Calon Guru. Diseminarkan Pada Seminar dan
Rapat Tahunan BKS-PTN Bidang MIPA. Universitas Negeri Medan.
Yuni Anggia Purnama, 2014
Analisis Kualitas Argumentasi Siswa Pada Pembelajaran Menggunakan Media Kartun
Konsep Sistem Imunitas
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu | perpustakaan.upi.edu
79
Naylor S, Keogh B dan Downing, B (2007). Argumentation and primary science.
Research in Science Education, 37 (1), 17-39.
Naylor, S dan Keogh, B. (2013). Concept Cartoon. [Online]. Tersedia:
http://conceptcartoons.com/what-is-a-concept-cartoon-.html (Diakses 18
Desember 2013)
Naylor, S dan Keogh, B. (2013). Concept Cartoons: What Have We Learnt?.
Journal of Turkish Science Education . 10(1), 3-11.
Özmen, H; Demircioğlu, G; Dan Burhan, Y. (2012). Using laboratory activities
enhanced with concept cartoons to support progression in students’
understanding of acid-base concepts. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science
Learning and Teaching. 13(1).
Peapell, S. (2008). Concept Cartoons Share a thon. [Online]. Tersedia:
http://www.schoolscience.co.uk. (Diakses 18 Desember 2013)
Pratiwi, D.A, et.al. (2007). Biologi SMA Jilid 2 untuk Kelas XI. Jakarta:
Erlangga.
Roshayanti, F dan Rustaman, N. (2013). Pengembangan Asesmen Argumentatif
Untuk Meningkatkan Pola Wacana Argumentasi Mahasiswa Pada Konsep
Fisiologi Manusia. Bioma, 2(1), 85-100.
Roshayanti, F. (2012). Pengembangan Asesmen Argumentatif Untuk
Meningkatkan Pola Wacana Argumentasi Mahasiswa Pada Konsep
Fisiologi Manusia. Disertasi Doktor pada SPS UPI Bandung: tidak
diterbitkan.
Roshayanti, F., Rustaman, N., Barlian, A., Lukmana, I. (2009) Profil
Sociocultural Prespective dalam Berargumentasi Mahasiswa Calon Guru
Biologi pada Perkuliahan Fisiologi Manusia. Proceedings The 3rd
International Seminar on Science Education”Challenging Science
Education in The Digital Era”.ISBN: 978-602-8171-14-1.
Sadler. T. D dan Zeidler D. L. (2002). “The Morality of Socioscientific Issues:
Construal and Resolution of Genetic Engineering Dilemmas”. Department
of Secondary Education, University of South Florida, Tampa,USA.
Simon, S. (2008). Using Toulmin’s Argument Pattern in the evaluation of
argumentation in school science [Online]. Tersedia : http:// ioe.ac.
(Diakses 17 Desember 2013)
Yuni Anggia Purnama, 2014
Analisis Kualitas Argumentasi Siswa Pada Pembelajaran Menggunakan Media Kartun
Konsep Sistem Imunitas
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu | perpustakaan.upi.edu
80
Sugiyono. (2012). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan Pendekatan Kuantitatif,
Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Toulmin, S. (1958). The Uses of Argument. Cambridge: Cambridge University
Press.
Yuni Anggia Purnama, 2014
Analisis Kualitas Argumentasi Siswa Pada Pembelajaran Menggunakan Media Kartun
Konsep Sistem Imunitas
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu | perpustakaan.upi.edu
DAFTAR PUSTAKA
Acar, O, Turkmen, L dan Roychoudhury, A. (2009). Student Difficulties in
Socio-scientific Argumentation and Decision-making Research Findings:
Crossing the borders of two research lines. International Journal of
Science Education.32 (1),pp 1191-1206.
Arikunto. (2006). Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktik, Edisi Revisi VI.
Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Bell, P., dan Linn, M. C. (2007) Scientific argument as learning artifact:
Designning for learning from the web with KIE. International Journal of
Science Education,22(8), 797-817.
Berland, L.K . (2009). Using A Learning Progression To Inform Scientific
Argumentation In Talk And Writing. Paper presented at the Learning
Progressions in Science (LeaPS) Conference. Iowa City, IA. University of
Texas at Austin.
Campbell, Reece, J.B., Urry.L.A., Wasserman, S.A., Minorsky, P.V., dan
Jackson, R.B. (2011). Biologi Ninth Edition. United States of America:
Pearson.
Campbell, Reece, J.B., Urry.L.A., Wasserman, S.A., Minorsky, P.V., dan
Jackson, R.B. (2010). Biologi Edisi Kedelapan Jilid 3. Jakarta: Penerbit
Erlangga
Dahar, R.W. (1996). Teori - Teori Belajar. Jakarta: Erlangga.
Dinas Pendidikan Nasional. (2013). Kurikulum 2013 Kompetensi Dasar Sekolah
Menengah Atas (SMA)/ Madrasah Aliyah (MA). Dinas Pendidikan
Nasional.
Duschl, R.A., Osborne, J. (2002). Supporting and Promoting Argumentation
Discourse in Science Education. Studies in Science Education. 38(1). 3972.
Eemeren, V., Grootendorst, R., Henkemans, A. (2002). Argumentation Analysis,
Evaluation, Presentations. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
Publisher.
Yuni Anggia Purnama, 2014
Analisis Kualitas Argumentasi Siswa Pada Pembelajaran Menggunakan Media Kartun
Konsep Sistem Imunitas
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu | perpustakaan.upi.edu
78
Eggert. S, Ostermeyer. F, Hasselhorn. M, dan Bögeholz. S. (2013). Socioscientifc
Decision Making in the Science Classroom: The Effect of Embedded
Metacognitive Instructions on Students’ Learning Outcomes. Education
Research International..
Ekici, F., Ekici, E. dan Aydin, F. (2007). Utility of Concept Cartoons in
Diagnosing and Overcoming Misconceptions Related to Photosynthesis.
International Journal of Environmental & Science Education, 2(4), 111 –
124.
Erduran, S., Shirley, S., dan J. Osborne. (2004). TAPping into argumentation:
Developments in the application of Toulmin’s Argument Pattern for
studying science discourse. Science Education, 88, 915-933 [Online].
Tersedia : http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/sce.20012/pdf
(Diakses 21 Januari 2014)
Fardhani, Indra. (2011). Analisis Kualitas Argumentasi Siswa Kelas VII SMP
pada Materi Ekosistem dengan Metode Debat. Skripsi Sarjana Pendidikan
Biologi UPI Bandung: tidak diterbitkan.
Kabapinar, F. (2005). Effectiveness of Teaching via Concept Cartoons from the
Point of View of Constructivist Approach. Educational Sciences: Theory
& Practice, 5 (1), 135-146.
Kabapinar, F. (2009). What Makes Concept Cartoons More Effective? Using
Research to Inform Practice. Education and Scienc, 34(154), 104-118.
Keogh, B dan Naylor, S. (1999) Concept cartoons, teaching and learning in
science: an evaluation. International Journal of Science Education, 21 (4),
431-446.
Kurnadi, K.A. (2011). Dasar-Dasar Anatomi dan Fisiologi Manusia Buku 2.
Bandung: Jurusan Pendidikan Biologi FPMIPA UPI.
Liston, Maeve. (2011). Using Concept Cartoons in the Junior Certificate Science
Classroom. National Centre for Excellence in Mathematics and Science
Teacing and Learning, 2(12).
Manurung, S.R dan Rustaman, N. (2012). Identifikasi Keterampilan Argumentasi
melalui Analisis “Toulmin Argumentation Pattern (TAP)” Pada Topik
Kinematik Bagi Mahasiswa Calon Guru. Diseminarkan Pada Seminar dan
Rapat Tahunan BKS-PTN Bidang MIPA. Universitas Negeri Medan.
Yuni Anggia Purnama, 2014
Analisis Kualitas Argumentasi Siswa Pada Pembelajaran Menggunakan Media Kartun
Konsep Sistem Imunitas
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu | perpustakaan.upi.edu
79
Naylor S, Keogh B dan Downing, B (2007). Argumentation and primary science.
Research in Science Education, 37 (1), 17-39.
Naylor, S dan Keogh, B. (2013). Concept Cartoon. [Online]. Tersedia:
http://conceptcartoons.com/what-is-a-concept-cartoon-.html (Diakses 18
Desember 2013)
Naylor, S dan Keogh, B. (2013). Concept Cartoons: What Have We Learnt?.
Journal of Turkish Science Education . 10(1), 3-11.
Özmen, H; Demircioğlu, G; Dan Burhan, Y. (2012). Using laboratory activities
enhanced with concept cartoons to support progression in students’
understanding of acid-base concepts. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science
Learning and Teaching. 13(1).
Peapell, S. (2008). Concept Cartoons Share a thon. [Online]. Tersedia:
http://www.schoolscience.co.uk. (Diakses 18 Desember 2013)
Pratiwi, D.A, et.al. (2007). Biologi SMA Jilid 2 untuk Kelas XI. Jakarta:
Erlangga.
Roshayanti, F dan Rustaman, N. (2013). Pengembangan Asesmen Argumentatif
Untuk Meningkatkan Pola Wacana Argumentasi Mahasiswa Pada Konsep
Fisiologi Manusia. Bioma, 2(1), 85-100.
Roshayanti, F. (2012). Pengembangan Asesmen Argumentatif Untuk
Meningkatkan Pola Wacana Argumentasi Mahasiswa Pada Konsep
Fisiologi Manusia. Disertasi Doktor pada SPS UPI Bandung: tidak
diterbitkan.
Roshayanti, F., Rustaman, N., Barlian, A., Lukmana, I. (2009) Profil
Sociocultural Prespective dalam Berargumentasi Mahasiswa Calon Guru
Biologi pada Perkuliahan Fisiologi Manusia. Proceedings The 3rd
International Seminar on Science Education”Challenging Science
Education in The Digital Era”.ISBN: 978-602-8171-14-1.
Sadler. T. D dan Zeidler D. L. (2002). “The Morality of Socioscientific Issues:
Construal and Resolution of Genetic Engineering Dilemmas”. Department
of Secondary Education, University of South Florida, Tampa,USA.
Simon, S. (2008). Using Toulmin’s Argument Pattern in the evaluation of
argumentation in school science [Online]. Tersedia : http:// ioe.ac.
(Diakses 17 Desember 2013)
Yuni Anggia Purnama, 2014
Analisis Kualitas Argumentasi Siswa Pada Pembelajaran Menggunakan Media Kartun
Konsep Sistem Imunitas
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu | perpustakaan.upi.edu
80
Sugiyono. (2012). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan Pendekatan Kuantitatif,
Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Toulmin, S. (1958). The Uses of Argument. Cambridge: Cambridge University
Press.
Yuni Anggia Purnama, 2014
Analisis Kualitas Argumentasi Siswa Pada Pembelajaran Menggunakan Media Kartun
Konsep Sistem Imunitas
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu | perpustakaan.upi.edu