INDONESIAN- ENGLISH CODE MIXING IN DEBATE OF POLITICAL PARTY ON TV ONE BROADCAST INDONESIAN- ENGLISH CODE MIXING IN DEBATE OF POLITICAL PARTY ON TV ONE BROADCAST (SOCIOLINGUISTICS APPROACH).
INDONESIAN- ENGLISH CODE MIXING IN DEBATE OF POLITICAL PARTY ON
TV ONE BROADCAST
(SOCIOLINGUISTICS APPROACH)
RESEARCH PAPER
Submitted as a Partial Fulfillment of
the Requirements for Getting Bachelor
Degree of Education in English Department
by:
WIWIED DWI IRIANTO
A.320040011
SCHOOL OF TEACHER TRAINING AND EDUCATION
MUHAMMADIYAH UNIVERSITY OF SURAKARTA
2011
APPROVAL
INDONESIAN- ENGLISH CODE MIXING IN DEBATE OF POLITICAL PARTY ON
TV ONE BROADCAST
(SOCIOLINGUISTICS APPROACH)
by:
WIWIED DWI IRIANTO
A.320040011
Approved by:
Consultant I
Drs. H. Maryadi M.A
Consultant II
Dra.Siti Khuzaimah
TESTIMONIAL STATEMENT
Herewith, I testify that in this research paper, there are no plagiarisms of the previous
literary work which has been raised to obtain bachelor degree of university, nor there are
opinions or masterpieces which have been written or published by other, except those which the
writing was referred in the manuscript and mentioned in bibliography.
Hence, later if it is proven that there are some untrue statements in this testimony,
hence I will hold fully responsible.
Surakarta, August, 20.2010
Wiwied Dwi Irianto
A.320 040 011
MOTTO
And seek help in patience and prayer and truly it is
extremely heavy and had except for true believers in Allah
(Al – Baqarah: 45)
Our lives are made
In these small hours
(Rob Thomas)
Destiny is not matter of chance, but choice
(William Jennings Brian)
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
Assalamu’alaikum Wr Wb.
Alhamdulillahhirobbilo’alamin, praise and gratitude only to Allah SWT, the owner of
these universe, the most Merciful who gives a million blessing, miracles and uncountable gifts to
the writer, so he can accomplish this research paper entitled INDONESIAN – ENGLISH CODE
MIXING
IN
DEBATE
OF
POLITICAL
PARTY
ON
TV
ONE
BROADCAST
(SOCIOLINGUISTICS APPROACH). Research Paper 2010 Peace upon to Muhammad S.A.W
the last messenger of Allah who will be a hero for all his followers in the life after.
The writer realizes that this research paper would never be possible without other people’s help,
so that the writer would like to thank to people who have supported him personally and
professionally over the years and during the making of this research paper, they are;
1. Drs. Sofyan Anif M, Si. as the dean of School of Teacher Training and Education of
Muhammadiyah University of Surakarta,
2. Titis Setyabudi, SS. as the chief of English Department has permitted to conduct this
research paper,
3. Drs. H. Maryadi, M.A. as the first consultant has given valuable guidance and suggestion
during the completion of his research paper,
4. Dra. Siti Khuzaimah. as the second consultant for being a good consultant and giving the
writer suggestion, precious time and correction of this research paper.
5. All of the lectures of English Department thanks for precious knowledge given to him,
6. His parents who has been his Guardian Angel for his whole life time, Love For you
yesterday, today, tomorrow, and forever. Allah always loves you.
7. His brother Arif who has been his best till today, thank you for back me up,
8. His friends Tezar, Anjar, Mus2va, Nia Ndot2 you are my spirit, you are the best give
form heaven in my life,and
9. All family, thank you and love you all always.
Deep down on the writer’s heart, she realizes that this research paper is so far from being
perfect. The writer invites comments and suggestion from the readers for the betterment of this
research paper. Hopefully, this research paper will be useful for those who are interested in
investigating the other element of speaking skill.
Wassalamu’alaikum Wr. Wb
Surakarta, Januari,
Wiwied Dwi Irianto
2011
DEDICATION
Truly deeply do, I dedicate this research paper
to;
My Lord, Allah SWT,
My president, Rasulullah S.A.W,
My beloved parents,
My brother,
My friend
ACCEPTANCE
INDONESIAN ENGLISH CODE MIXING IN POLITICAL DEBATE OF POLITICAL
PARTY ON TV ONE BROADCAST
(SOCIOLINGUISTICS APPROACH)
by
Wiwied Dwi Irianto
A. 320 040 011
Accepted by the Board of Examiner
School of Teacher Training and Education
Muhammadiyah University of Surakarta
on Januari,…..2011
Team of Examiner :
1. Drs. H. Maryadi, M.A.
(
)
(
)
(
)
(Chair Person)
2. Dra. Siti Khuzaimah
(Member I)
3. Dra. Siti Zuhriah, M.Hum
(Member II)
Dean,
(Drs. Sofyan Anif, M. Si)
TABLE OF CONTENT
TITLE.......................................................................................................... i
APPROVAL ……………………………………………………………… ii
ACCEPTANCE ………………………………………………………….. iii
TESTIMONIAL STATEMENT …………………………………………. iv
MOTTO ………………………………………………………………….. v
DEDICATION ………………………………………………………….. vi
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT ……………………………………………… vii
TABLE OF CONTENT ………………………………………………… ix
SUMMARY ……………………………………………………………. xii
CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION
A. Background of the Study................................................ 1
B. Previous Study............................................................... 3
C. Focus of the study.......................................................... 4
D. Objective of the Study..................................................... 4
E. Limitation of the Study.................................................. 4
F. Benefit of the Study....................................................... 5
G. Research Paper Organization......................................... 5
CHAPTER II UNDERLYING THEORY
A. Sociolinguistics..............................................................
7
1. Definition of Sociolinguistics………………………. 7
2. Scope of Sociolinguistics……………………….
8
B. Bilingualism…………...................................................
9
C. Code Mixing .............................................................
10
D. Reason of Using Code M ixing......................................
12
E. Notion of Context………………………………………. 14
F. Speaking Formula............................................................ 15
CHAPTER III RESEARCH METHOD
A. Type of the Research................................................................ 18
B. Object of the Research.............................................................
18
C. Data Source and Data ..............................................................
18
D. Technique of Collecting Data …............................................
19
E. Technique of Analyzing Data ………………………………
19
CHAPTER IV DATA ANALYSIS AND DISCUSSION
A. Data Analysis of Code Mixing on Political Debate Party ................... 20
1. Type of Code Mixing
a. Situational Code Mixing ......................................................... 20
b. Metaphorical Code Mixing ..................................................... 29
2. The Use of Code Mixing on Political Debate Party
a. Need Feeling Motive ............................................................... 31
b. Prestige Feeling Motive .......................................................... 34
B. Discussion of the Finding .................................................................... 34
1. The Type of Code Mixing on Political Debate Party .................... 40
2. The Use of Code Mixing on Political Debate Party ...................... 42
LIST OF DATA
Burhanudin Napitupulu
: Survey dalam pengertian sekarang banyak persamaan, tadinya
kita sepakat duet sekarang merupakan duet yang ideal.
Ruhut Sitompul
: The ruling party sebenarnya kalau kita jujur memang Demokrat
dan dengan Pak JK menjadi Ketua umum Partai Golkar mestinya
Golkar juga the ruling party, marilah kita sama-sama santun
Burhanudin Napitupulu
: Peluang JK dalam Pilpres 2009 sangat baik karena Golkar sangat
disenangi orang karena Golkar selalu berhubungan baik dengan
semua partai jadi jangan claim mungkinkah Golkar dengan PDIP
akan koalisi? Mungkin, tapi kalau Demokrat dengan PDIP koalisi?
Kan gak mungkin
Ruhut Sitompul
: Tadi kita mendengar sahabat saya Bernard bahawa last polling ini
lucu, tapi kata dia polling Golkar bagus tapi mana kala polling
Demokrat diatas, eh dia katakana ini pesanan.
Ruhut Sitompul
: Tapi katanya, PDIP tidak mungkin berkoalisi dengan Demokrat.
Ingat Bernard! Ketua Pembina PDIP (Bapak Taufik Kemas) makan
malam dengan Ketua Partai Demokrat. Tapi mana tahu last
minutes ini ilmu politik, mana tahu 2+2 = 11,9 mana tahu ini
permainan
Burhanudin Napitupulu
: Saya kira sama dengan Demokrat. Golkar punya experiences
yang panjang, kapan dia berangkat kapan dia berhenti, kita telah
menorehkan history yang panjang, dan Golkar telah menorehkan
sejarang dengan Demokrat selam 4 tahun. Dalam sejarahpun tidak
ada dwitunggal selam 4 tahun.
Jhoni Alen Marfun
: Pertama, Partai Demokrat tidak pernah mencampuri/ menilai
rumah tangga parati lain karena itu bukan merupakan wewenang
kita. Kalaupun ada argument institusi, jadi saya tekankan sekali
lagi Partai Demokrat tidak mencampuri partai lain.
Yamin Pawari
: Bahwa banyak sekali masyarakat umum mendesak Partai Golkar,
mengapa anda tersinggung? Anda boleh saya mendesak Partai
Demokrat, tapi kami menjawab “ itu bukan character Partai
Golkar”
Yamin Pawari
: Bukan masalah figure yang salah ucap tapi hal yang terpenting
adalah claim masalah keberhasilan pembangunan, tapi kita lihat
bahwa anggaran 20% yang sekarang dianggap keberhasilan Partai
Demokrat tapi itu sebenarnya keberhasilan DPR. Bahwa kita tahu
sebagian besar anggota DPR berasal dari Golkar. Tidak hanya itu
saja, misalnya claim perdamaian dan terciptanya keamanan di
Indonesia, semua orang tahu conflict agama di Poso dan
ketidakadilan di Aceh itu adalah keberhasilan Ketua Umum Partai
Golkar. Bahwa Negara Jepang dalam hal ini Universitas terkenal di
Jepang yang berbasis Agama Budha memberikan penghargaan
kepada Yusuf Kalla.
SUMMARY
Wiwied Dwi Irianto: A.320.040.011. INDONESIAN – ENGLISH CODE MIXING IN DEBATE
OF POLITICAL PARTY ON TV ONE BROADCAST (SOCIOLINGUISTICS APPROACH).
Research Paper 2010 Muhammadiyah University of Surakarta.
This research aims to describe the types of code mixing used on Debate of Political Party
and to describe cause of Code Mixing by representative Debate of Political Party
This research is a qualitative research. The data are taken from recording, transcribing
and classifying the data related with English code mixing in the Debate Party.
. The object of the study is English code mixing used by the representative from
Demokrat and Golkar Party in Debate of Political Party on TV ONE. The object collected from
one episode: 22/2/2009 at 07.00 pm.
The result of study shows that, the type of code mixing on debate political party there are
found Situational Code Mixing and Metaphorical Code Mixhing. In Situational Code Mixing
there found 12 datum or about 85,8%. In Metaphorical Code Mixing there are found 2 datum or
about 14,2%. In metaphorical code Mixing there found need filling motive and Prestige filling
motive. In need feeling motive there are found 6 datum or about 43,8% and in prestige feeling
motive there also found 9 datum or about 64,2%. The participant on the party debate are using
situational code mixing, because the situation and the participant within the debate is only
several and certain participant involve. On the party debate, it usually consists of several
participants with a high education capability, so code mixing here is very important und useful to
stress the main purposes of the debate. That’s why situational code mixing is used more than
metaphorical code mixing. While the use of need feeling motive and prestige feeling motive has
the same (balance) datum because both has similar uses.
Keywords: Sociolinguistic, code mixing, Political Debate Party.
Consultant I
Consultant II
Drs. H. Maryadi, MA
Dra. Siti Khuzaimah
NIP. 19580304 198603 1 001
NIK. 473
Dean
Drs. Sofyan Anif, M. Si
NIK. 547
TV ONE BROADCAST
(SOCIOLINGUISTICS APPROACH)
RESEARCH PAPER
Submitted as a Partial Fulfillment of
the Requirements for Getting Bachelor
Degree of Education in English Department
by:
WIWIED DWI IRIANTO
A.320040011
SCHOOL OF TEACHER TRAINING AND EDUCATION
MUHAMMADIYAH UNIVERSITY OF SURAKARTA
2011
APPROVAL
INDONESIAN- ENGLISH CODE MIXING IN DEBATE OF POLITICAL PARTY ON
TV ONE BROADCAST
(SOCIOLINGUISTICS APPROACH)
by:
WIWIED DWI IRIANTO
A.320040011
Approved by:
Consultant I
Drs. H. Maryadi M.A
Consultant II
Dra.Siti Khuzaimah
TESTIMONIAL STATEMENT
Herewith, I testify that in this research paper, there are no plagiarisms of the previous
literary work which has been raised to obtain bachelor degree of university, nor there are
opinions or masterpieces which have been written or published by other, except those which the
writing was referred in the manuscript and mentioned in bibliography.
Hence, later if it is proven that there are some untrue statements in this testimony,
hence I will hold fully responsible.
Surakarta, August, 20.2010
Wiwied Dwi Irianto
A.320 040 011
MOTTO
And seek help in patience and prayer and truly it is
extremely heavy and had except for true believers in Allah
(Al – Baqarah: 45)
Our lives are made
In these small hours
(Rob Thomas)
Destiny is not matter of chance, but choice
(William Jennings Brian)
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
Assalamu’alaikum Wr Wb.
Alhamdulillahhirobbilo’alamin, praise and gratitude only to Allah SWT, the owner of
these universe, the most Merciful who gives a million blessing, miracles and uncountable gifts to
the writer, so he can accomplish this research paper entitled INDONESIAN – ENGLISH CODE
MIXING
IN
DEBATE
OF
POLITICAL
PARTY
ON
TV
ONE
BROADCAST
(SOCIOLINGUISTICS APPROACH). Research Paper 2010 Peace upon to Muhammad S.A.W
the last messenger of Allah who will be a hero for all his followers in the life after.
The writer realizes that this research paper would never be possible without other people’s help,
so that the writer would like to thank to people who have supported him personally and
professionally over the years and during the making of this research paper, they are;
1. Drs. Sofyan Anif M, Si. as the dean of School of Teacher Training and Education of
Muhammadiyah University of Surakarta,
2. Titis Setyabudi, SS. as the chief of English Department has permitted to conduct this
research paper,
3. Drs. H. Maryadi, M.A. as the first consultant has given valuable guidance and suggestion
during the completion of his research paper,
4. Dra. Siti Khuzaimah. as the second consultant for being a good consultant and giving the
writer suggestion, precious time and correction of this research paper.
5. All of the lectures of English Department thanks for precious knowledge given to him,
6. His parents who has been his Guardian Angel for his whole life time, Love For you
yesterday, today, tomorrow, and forever. Allah always loves you.
7. His brother Arif who has been his best till today, thank you for back me up,
8. His friends Tezar, Anjar, Mus2va, Nia Ndot2 you are my spirit, you are the best give
form heaven in my life,and
9. All family, thank you and love you all always.
Deep down on the writer’s heart, she realizes that this research paper is so far from being
perfect. The writer invites comments and suggestion from the readers for the betterment of this
research paper. Hopefully, this research paper will be useful for those who are interested in
investigating the other element of speaking skill.
Wassalamu’alaikum Wr. Wb
Surakarta, Januari,
Wiwied Dwi Irianto
2011
DEDICATION
Truly deeply do, I dedicate this research paper
to;
My Lord, Allah SWT,
My president, Rasulullah S.A.W,
My beloved parents,
My brother,
My friend
ACCEPTANCE
INDONESIAN ENGLISH CODE MIXING IN POLITICAL DEBATE OF POLITICAL
PARTY ON TV ONE BROADCAST
(SOCIOLINGUISTICS APPROACH)
by
Wiwied Dwi Irianto
A. 320 040 011
Accepted by the Board of Examiner
School of Teacher Training and Education
Muhammadiyah University of Surakarta
on Januari,…..2011
Team of Examiner :
1. Drs. H. Maryadi, M.A.
(
)
(
)
(
)
(Chair Person)
2. Dra. Siti Khuzaimah
(Member I)
3. Dra. Siti Zuhriah, M.Hum
(Member II)
Dean,
(Drs. Sofyan Anif, M. Si)
TABLE OF CONTENT
TITLE.......................................................................................................... i
APPROVAL ……………………………………………………………… ii
ACCEPTANCE ………………………………………………………….. iii
TESTIMONIAL STATEMENT …………………………………………. iv
MOTTO ………………………………………………………………….. v
DEDICATION ………………………………………………………….. vi
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT ……………………………………………… vii
TABLE OF CONTENT ………………………………………………… ix
SUMMARY ……………………………………………………………. xii
CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION
A. Background of the Study................................................ 1
B. Previous Study............................................................... 3
C. Focus of the study.......................................................... 4
D. Objective of the Study..................................................... 4
E. Limitation of the Study.................................................. 4
F. Benefit of the Study....................................................... 5
G. Research Paper Organization......................................... 5
CHAPTER II UNDERLYING THEORY
A. Sociolinguistics..............................................................
7
1. Definition of Sociolinguistics………………………. 7
2. Scope of Sociolinguistics……………………….
8
B. Bilingualism…………...................................................
9
C. Code Mixing .............................................................
10
D. Reason of Using Code M ixing......................................
12
E. Notion of Context………………………………………. 14
F. Speaking Formula............................................................ 15
CHAPTER III RESEARCH METHOD
A. Type of the Research................................................................ 18
B. Object of the Research.............................................................
18
C. Data Source and Data ..............................................................
18
D. Technique of Collecting Data …............................................
19
E. Technique of Analyzing Data ………………………………
19
CHAPTER IV DATA ANALYSIS AND DISCUSSION
A. Data Analysis of Code Mixing on Political Debate Party ................... 20
1. Type of Code Mixing
a. Situational Code Mixing ......................................................... 20
b. Metaphorical Code Mixing ..................................................... 29
2. The Use of Code Mixing on Political Debate Party
a. Need Feeling Motive ............................................................... 31
b. Prestige Feeling Motive .......................................................... 34
B. Discussion of the Finding .................................................................... 34
1. The Type of Code Mixing on Political Debate Party .................... 40
2. The Use of Code Mixing on Political Debate Party ...................... 42
LIST OF DATA
Burhanudin Napitupulu
: Survey dalam pengertian sekarang banyak persamaan, tadinya
kita sepakat duet sekarang merupakan duet yang ideal.
Ruhut Sitompul
: The ruling party sebenarnya kalau kita jujur memang Demokrat
dan dengan Pak JK menjadi Ketua umum Partai Golkar mestinya
Golkar juga the ruling party, marilah kita sama-sama santun
Burhanudin Napitupulu
: Peluang JK dalam Pilpres 2009 sangat baik karena Golkar sangat
disenangi orang karena Golkar selalu berhubungan baik dengan
semua partai jadi jangan claim mungkinkah Golkar dengan PDIP
akan koalisi? Mungkin, tapi kalau Demokrat dengan PDIP koalisi?
Kan gak mungkin
Ruhut Sitompul
: Tadi kita mendengar sahabat saya Bernard bahawa last polling ini
lucu, tapi kata dia polling Golkar bagus tapi mana kala polling
Demokrat diatas, eh dia katakana ini pesanan.
Ruhut Sitompul
: Tapi katanya, PDIP tidak mungkin berkoalisi dengan Demokrat.
Ingat Bernard! Ketua Pembina PDIP (Bapak Taufik Kemas) makan
malam dengan Ketua Partai Demokrat. Tapi mana tahu last
minutes ini ilmu politik, mana tahu 2+2 = 11,9 mana tahu ini
permainan
Burhanudin Napitupulu
: Saya kira sama dengan Demokrat. Golkar punya experiences
yang panjang, kapan dia berangkat kapan dia berhenti, kita telah
menorehkan history yang panjang, dan Golkar telah menorehkan
sejarang dengan Demokrat selam 4 tahun. Dalam sejarahpun tidak
ada dwitunggal selam 4 tahun.
Jhoni Alen Marfun
: Pertama, Partai Demokrat tidak pernah mencampuri/ menilai
rumah tangga parati lain karena itu bukan merupakan wewenang
kita. Kalaupun ada argument institusi, jadi saya tekankan sekali
lagi Partai Demokrat tidak mencampuri partai lain.
Yamin Pawari
: Bahwa banyak sekali masyarakat umum mendesak Partai Golkar,
mengapa anda tersinggung? Anda boleh saya mendesak Partai
Demokrat, tapi kami menjawab “ itu bukan character Partai
Golkar”
Yamin Pawari
: Bukan masalah figure yang salah ucap tapi hal yang terpenting
adalah claim masalah keberhasilan pembangunan, tapi kita lihat
bahwa anggaran 20% yang sekarang dianggap keberhasilan Partai
Demokrat tapi itu sebenarnya keberhasilan DPR. Bahwa kita tahu
sebagian besar anggota DPR berasal dari Golkar. Tidak hanya itu
saja, misalnya claim perdamaian dan terciptanya keamanan di
Indonesia, semua orang tahu conflict agama di Poso dan
ketidakadilan di Aceh itu adalah keberhasilan Ketua Umum Partai
Golkar. Bahwa Negara Jepang dalam hal ini Universitas terkenal di
Jepang yang berbasis Agama Budha memberikan penghargaan
kepada Yusuf Kalla.
SUMMARY
Wiwied Dwi Irianto: A.320.040.011. INDONESIAN – ENGLISH CODE MIXING IN DEBATE
OF POLITICAL PARTY ON TV ONE BROADCAST (SOCIOLINGUISTICS APPROACH).
Research Paper 2010 Muhammadiyah University of Surakarta.
This research aims to describe the types of code mixing used on Debate of Political Party
and to describe cause of Code Mixing by representative Debate of Political Party
This research is a qualitative research. The data are taken from recording, transcribing
and classifying the data related with English code mixing in the Debate Party.
. The object of the study is English code mixing used by the representative from
Demokrat and Golkar Party in Debate of Political Party on TV ONE. The object collected from
one episode: 22/2/2009 at 07.00 pm.
The result of study shows that, the type of code mixing on debate political party there are
found Situational Code Mixing and Metaphorical Code Mixhing. In Situational Code Mixing
there found 12 datum or about 85,8%. In Metaphorical Code Mixing there are found 2 datum or
about 14,2%. In metaphorical code Mixing there found need filling motive and Prestige filling
motive. In need feeling motive there are found 6 datum or about 43,8% and in prestige feeling
motive there also found 9 datum or about 64,2%. The participant on the party debate are using
situational code mixing, because the situation and the participant within the debate is only
several and certain participant involve. On the party debate, it usually consists of several
participants with a high education capability, so code mixing here is very important und useful to
stress the main purposes of the debate. That’s why situational code mixing is used more than
metaphorical code mixing. While the use of need feeling motive and prestige feeling motive has
the same (balance) datum because both has similar uses.
Keywords: Sociolinguistic, code mixing, Political Debate Party.
Consultant I
Consultant II
Drs. H. Maryadi, MA
Dra. Siti Khuzaimah
NIP. 19580304 198603 1 001
NIK. 473
Dean
Drs. Sofyan Anif, M. Si
NIK. 547