S IPSE 1205678 Bibliography
61
REFERENCE
Abdulghani, H. M., Ahmad, F., Ponnamperuma, G. G., Khalil, M. S., &Aldrees,
A. (2014). The relationship between non-functioning distractors and item
difficulty of multiple choice questions: a descriptive analysis. Journal of
Health Specialties, 2(4), 148.
Abd-El-Khalick, F. (2013). Teaching with and about nature of science, and
science teacher knowledge domains. Science &Education, 22(9), 20872107.
Abd-El-Khalick, F., & Lederman, N. G. (2000). The influence of history of
science courses on students' views of nature of science. Journal of
research in science teaching, 37(10), 1057-1095.
Akerson, V. L., Abd-El-Khalick, F., & Lederman, N. G. (2000). Influence of a
reflective explicit activity-based approach on elementary teachers'
conceptions of nature of science. Journal of research in Science
Teaching,37(4), 295-317.
Anderson, L.W., Krathwohl, D.R., & Bloom, B.S. (Editors). (2001). A Taxonomy
for Learning, Teaching and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy
of Educational Objectives. New York: Longman. [Online].Retrived from
http://www.books.google.co.id.[Accessed on October 31, 2015].
Allchin, D. (2012). The Minnesota case study collection: New historical inquiry
case studies for nature of science education. Science & Education, 21(9),
1263-1281.
Arikunto, S. (2010).Manajemenpenelitian. Jakarta. Bumi Aksara.
Bell, M., & Isaacs, A. (2007).The case of Every Mathematics.In C. R. Hirsch
(Ed), Perspectives on the design and development of school mathematics
curricula.
Reston,
VA:
NCTM.
[Online].
Retrived
from
http://www.ejmste.com. [Accessed on January 25, 2016].
Bell, R. L. (2009). Teaching the nature of science: Three critical questions. Best
Practices in Science Education. Zugriff am, 15, 13. [Online]. Retrived
from http://ngspscience.com. [Accessed on January 28, 2016].
Buxner, S. R. (2015). Exploring How Research Experiences For Teachers
Changes Their Understandings Of The Nature Of Science And Scientific
Inquiry. Journal of Astronomy & Earth Sciences Education (JAESE), 1(1),
53-68.
Amaira Utami, 2016
THE PROFILE OF STUDENTS NATURE OF SCIENCE (NOS) ON INTERACTION OF ORGTANISMS AND
ITS ENVIRONMENT TOPIC AT SEKOLAH INDONESIA KUALA LUMPUR
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu | perpustakaan.upi.edu
62
Carmines, E.G., & Zeller, R.A. (1979).Reliability and Validity
Assessment.London:
Sage
Publisher.
[Online].Retrived
from
http://www.books.google.co.id.[Accessed on November 16, 2015].
Çelik, S., & Karataş, F. Ö. (2015). Relationship Between Pre-Service Teachers’
Views of Nature of Science and Their Study Subjects. Kastamonu Eğitim
Dergisi, 23(2), 755-772.
Chen, S. (2006). Development of an instrument to assess views on nature of
science and attitudes toward teaching science. Science Education, 90(5),
803-819.
Cho, J. M., Kim, S. J., Lee, S. H., Kim, K. Y., Ok, H. J., Rim, H. M., Park, Y. B.,
Lee, M. H., Han, H. J., & Son, S. K. (2011). The trends in international
mathematics and science study (TIMSS 2011): A technical report of the
main survey in Korea. Seoul: Korea Institute of Curriculum & Evaluation.
Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007).Research Methods in Education.
London and New York: Routledge. [Online].Retrived from
http://www.books.google.co.id.[Accessed on November 26, 2015].
Colagrande, E. A., de Assis Martorano, S. A., & Arroio, A. (2015). Reflections
About Teaching Nature of Science Mediated by Images. Reflections,
12(1).
Creswell, J.W. (2012). Educational Research Planning, Conducting and
Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research.Boston: Pearson.
Downing, S.M. &Yudkowsky, R. (2009). Assessment in Health Professions
Education. New York and London: Routledge.[Online].Retrived from
http://www.books.google.co.id.[Accessed on October 31, 2015].
Duschl, R. A., & Grandy, R. (2013). Two views about explicitly teaching nature
of science. Science & Education, 22(9), 2109-2139.
Erickson, F. (2012).Qualitative research methods for science education.InSecond
international handbook of science education (pp. 1451-1469).Springer
Netherlands. [Online]. Retrived from http://ksu.edu.sa. [Accessed on July
19, 2016].
Ferrando, P. J. (2012). Assessing the Discriminating Power of Item and Test
Scores in the Linear Factor-Analysis Model.Psicologica: International
Journal of Methodology and Experimental Psychology, 33(1), 111-134.
Amaira Utami, 2016
THE PROFILE OF STUDENTS NATURE OF SCIENCE (NOS) ON INTERACTION OF ORGTANISMS AND
ITS ENVIRONMENT TOPIC AT SEKOLAH INDONESIA KUALA LUMPUR
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu | perpustakaan.upi.edu
63
Forehand, M. (2010).Bloom’s taxonomy.Emerging perspectives on learning,
teaching
and
technology,
41-47.[Online].Retrived
from
http://www.edumoodle.at.[Accessed on October 28, 2015].
Fraenkel, J.R., Wallen, N.E., & Hyun, H.H. (2007).How to Design and Evaluate
Research in Education. San Francisco: McGraw Hill.
Garner-O’Neale, L., & Ogunkola, B. (2015). Effects of Interest in Science, Study
Habits, Sex and Level of Study on the Nature of Science Literacy Level of
Undergraduate Chemistry Students of the University of the West Indies,
Barbados. Journal of Educational and Social Research, 5(2), 267.
Hadi, A. N. (2014). Utilization of Biopuppet Learning Media through the
Implementation of Problem Based Learning Strategy to Improve Students’
Learning Interest and Understanding.
Hayes, K. N., &Trexler, C. J. (2016).Testing predictors of instructional practice in
elementary
science
education:
The
significant
role
of
accountability. Science Education, 100(2), 266-289.
Hollar, S. (2012).Ecology: The Delicate Balance of Life on Earth. The
environment: ours to save. New York: The Rosen Publishing Group.
[Online].Retrived from http://www.books.google.co.id.[Accessed on
November 6, 2015].
Hsin, M. C., Chien, S. P., Hsu, Y. S., Lin, C. Y., & Yore, L. D.
(2016).Development and validation of a Taiwanese communication
progression in science education. International Journal of Science and
Mathematics Education, 14(1), 125-143.
Johnson, G., Gaspar, A., Boyer, N., Bennett, C., &Armitage, W. (2012).Applying
the revised Bloom's taxonomy of the cognitive domain to linux system
administration assessments.Journal of Computing Sciences in Colleges,
28(2), 238-247.
Jorgensen, S.E. (2009). Ecosystem Ecology. Amsterdam: Academic Press.
[Online].Retrived from http://www.books.google.co.id.[Accessed on
November 6, 2015].
Kaplan, R.M., &Saccuzzo, D.P. (2012).Psychological Testing: Principles,
Applications, & Issues. San Diego: Wadsworth Cengage Learning.
Kim, M. K., & Cho, M. K. (2015). The Study of Constructed-Response
Assessment of Elementary Mathematics Education in Korea. Eurasia
Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 11(2), 299311.
Amaira Utami, 2016
THE PROFILE OF STUDENTS NATURE OF SCIENCE (NOS) ON INTERACTION OF ORGTANISMS AND
ITS ENVIRONMENT TOPIC AT SEKOLAH INDONESIA KUALA LUMPUR
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu | perpustakaan.upi.edu
64
Krathwohl, D. R. (2002). A revision of Bloom's taxonomy: An overview. Theory
into
practice,
41(4),
212-218.[Online].Retrived
from
http://www.wikispaces.net.[Accessed on October 28, 2015].
Lederman, N. G., Abd‐El‐Khalick, F., Bell, R. L., & Schwartz, R. S. (2002).
Views of nature of science questionnaire: Toward valid and meaningful
assessment of learners' conceptions of nature of science. Journal of
research in science teaching, 39(6), 497-521.
Lightner, J. &Hennigan, T. (2013).The Ecology Book: Wonders of Creation. :
New
Leaf
Publishing
Group.
[Online].Retrived
from
http://www.books.google.co.id.[Accessed on November 6, 2015].
Liu, X. (2010).Using and Developing Measurement Instruments in Science
Education: A Researh Modeling Approach (Hc). United States: IAP.
[Online].Retrived from http://www.books.google.co.id.[Accessed on
October 31, 2015].
Long, D. A., Mitchell, M. L., Young, J., & Rickard, C. M. (2014).Assessing core
outcomes in graduates: psychometric evaluation of the Paediatric Intensive
Care Unit‐Nursing Knowledge and Skills Test. Journal of advanced
nursing, 70(3), 698-708.
Martin, M., Mullis, I. V., & Foy, P. (2015). TIMSS 2015 assessment design.
TIMSS, 85-99. [Online]. Retrived from http://www.bc.edu. [Accessed on
January 25, 2016].
Mastascusa, E.J., Synder, W,J., & Hoyt, B.S. (2011). Effective Instruction for
STEM Disciplines: From Learning Theory to College Teaching. San
Francisco:
John
Wiley
&
Sons.
[Online].Retrived
from
http://www.books.google.co.id.[Accessed on October 31, 2015].
Matthews, M. R. (2012). Changing the focus: From nature of science (NOS) to
features of science (FOS). In Advances in nature of science research (pp.
3-26). Springer Netherlands.
McComas, W. F., Clough, M. P., & Almazroa, H. (1998). The role and character
of the nature of science in science education. In The nature of science in
science education (pp. 3-39). Springer Netherlands.
McDonald, M.E. (2014). The Nurse Educator’s Guide to Assessing Learning
Outcomes. Brooklyn: Jones & Bartlett Publishers. [Online].Retrived from
http://www.books.google.co.id.[Accessed on October 30, 2015].
Amaira Utami, 2016
THE PROFILE OF STUDENTS NATURE OF SCIENCE (NOS) ON INTERACTION OF ORGTANISMS AND
ITS ENVIRONMENT TOPIC AT SEKOLAH INDONESIA KUALA LUMPUR
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu | perpustakaan.upi.edu
65
McFarlane, D. A. (2013).Understanding the challenges of science education in the
21st century: New opportunities for scientific literacy. International
Letters of Social and Humanistic Sciences, 4(1), 35-44. [
Militaru, G., Pollifroni, M., &Niculescu, C. (2015, November). The Role of
Technology Entrepreneurship Education in Encouraging to Launch New
Ventures. In Balkan Region Conference on Engineering and Business
Education (Vol. 1, No. 1).
Molles, M.C. (2013). Ecology Concept and Applications. Mexico: McGraw-Hill
Education.
Mourgues, C., Tan, M., Hein, S., Elliott, J. G., &Grigorenko, E. L. (2016). Using
creativity to predict future academic performance: An application of
Aurora's five subtests for creativity. Learning and Individual Differences.
Pianka,
E.R.
(2011).
Evolutionary
Ecology.[Online].Retrived
http://www.books.google.co.id.[Accessed on November 6, 2015].
from
Plucker, J. A., Beghetto, R. A., & Dow, G. T. (2004). Why isn't creativity more
important to educational psychologists? Potentials, pitfalls, and future
directions in creativity research. Educational psychologist, 39(2), 83-96.
Reece, J.B., Urry, L.A., Cain, M.L., Wasserman, S.A., Minorsky, P.V., &
Jackson, R.B.(2011). Campbell Biology. Boston: Pearson.
Schleigh, S. P., Clark, D. B., & Menekse, M. (2015). Constructed-response as an
alternative to interviews in conceptual change studies: Students’
explanations of force. International Journal of Education in Mathematics,
Science and Technology, 3(1), 14-36.
Schmitz, O.J. (2013). Ecology and Ecosystem Conservation. Washington, D.C:
Island
Press.
[Online].Retrived
from
http://www.books.google.co.id.[Accessed on November 6, 2015].
Schwartz, R. S., Lederman, N. G., & Abd‐el‐Khalick, F. (2012). A series of
misrepresentations: A response to Allchin's whole approach to assessing
nature of science understandings. Science Education, 96(4), 685-692.
Simkin, M. G., &Kuechler, W. L. (2005). Multiple‐Choice Tests and Student
Understanding: What Is the Connection?.Decision Sciences Journal of
Innovative Education, 3(1), 73-98.
Amaira Utami, 2016
THE PROFILE OF STUDENTS NATURE OF SCIENCE (NOS) ON INTERACTION OF ORGTANISMS AND
ITS ENVIRONMENT TOPIC AT SEKOLAH INDONESIA KUALA LUMPUR
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu | perpustakaan.upi.edu
66
Tomak, L., &Bek, Y. (2015).Item analysis and evaluation in the examinations in
the faculty of medicine at OndokuzMayis University.Nigerian journal of
clinical practice, 18(3), 387-394.
Weathers, K.C. (2012).Fundamental of Ecosystem Science. London: Academic
Press. [Online].Retrived from http://www.books.google.co.id.[Accessed
on November 6, 2015].
Xu, D., & Chi, M. T. (2016).Bridging Emergent Attributes and Darwinian
Principles in Teaching Natural Selection.
Yuan, W., Deng, C., Zhu, H., & Li, J. (2013). The Statistical Analysis and
Evaluation of Examination Results of Materials Research Methods Course.
Creative Education, 3(07), 162.
Amaira Utami, 2016
THE PROFILE OF STUDENTS NATURE OF SCIENCE (NOS) ON INTERACTION OF ORGTANISMS AND
ITS ENVIRONMENT TOPIC AT SEKOLAH INDONESIA KUALA LUMPUR
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu | perpustakaan.upi.edu
REFERENCE
Abdulghani, H. M., Ahmad, F., Ponnamperuma, G. G., Khalil, M. S., &Aldrees,
A. (2014). The relationship between non-functioning distractors and item
difficulty of multiple choice questions: a descriptive analysis. Journal of
Health Specialties, 2(4), 148.
Abd-El-Khalick, F. (2013). Teaching with and about nature of science, and
science teacher knowledge domains. Science &Education, 22(9), 20872107.
Abd-El-Khalick, F., & Lederman, N. G. (2000). The influence of history of
science courses on students' views of nature of science. Journal of
research in science teaching, 37(10), 1057-1095.
Akerson, V. L., Abd-El-Khalick, F., & Lederman, N. G. (2000). Influence of a
reflective explicit activity-based approach on elementary teachers'
conceptions of nature of science. Journal of research in Science
Teaching,37(4), 295-317.
Anderson, L.W., Krathwohl, D.R., & Bloom, B.S. (Editors). (2001). A Taxonomy
for Learning, Teaching and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy
of Educational Objectives. New York: Longman. [Online].Retrived from
http://www.books.google.co.id.[Accessed on October 31, 2015].
Allchin, D. (2012). The Minnesota case study collection: New historical inquiry
case studies for nature of science education. Science & Education, 21(9),
1263-1281.
Arikunto, S. (2010).Manajemenpenelitian. Jakarta. Bumi Aksara.
Bell, M., & Isaacs, A. (2007).The case of Every Mathematics.In C. R. Hirsch
(Ed), Perspectives on the design and development of school mathematics
curricula.
Reston,
VA:
NCTM.
[Online].
Retrived
from
http://www.ejmste.com. [Accessed on January 25, 2016].
Bell, R. L. (2009). Teaching the nature of science: Three critical questions. Best
Practices in Science Education. Zugriff am, 15, 13. [Online]. Retrived
from http://ngspscience.com. [Accessed on January 28, 2016].
Buxner, S. R. (2015). Exploring How Research Experiences For Teachers
Changes Their Understandings Of The Nature Of Science And Scientific
Inquiry. Journal of Astronomy & Earth Sciences Education (JAESE), 1(1),
53-68.
Amaira Utami, 2016
THE PROFILE OF STUDENTS NATURE OF SCIENCE (NOS) ON INTERACTION OF ORGTANISMS AND
ITS ENVIRONMENT TOPIC AT SEKOLAH INDONESIA KUALA LUMPUR
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu | perpustakaan.upi.edu
62
Carmines, E.G., & Zeller, R.A. (1979).Reliability and Validity
Assessment.London:
Sage
Publisher.
[Online].Retrived
from
http://www.books.google.co.id.[Accessed on November 16, 2015].
Çelik, S., & Karataş, F. Ö. (2015). Relationship Between Pre-Service Teachers’
Views of Nature of Science and Their Study Subjects. Kastamonu Eğitim
Dergisi, 23(2), 755-772.
Chen, S. (2006). Development of an instrument to assess views on nature of
science and attitudes toward teaching science. Science Education, 90(5),
803-819.
Cho, J. M., Kim, S. J., Lee, S. H., Kim, K. Y., Ok, H. J., Rim, H. M., Park, Y. B.,
Lee, M. H., Han, H. J., & Son, S. K. (2011). The trends in international
mathematics and science study (TIMSS 2011): A technical report of the
main survey in Korea. Seoul: Korea Institute of Curriculum & Evaluation.
Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007).Research Methods in Education.
London and New York: Routledge. [Online].Retrived from
http://www.books.google.co.id.[Accessed on November 26, 2015].
Colagrande, E. A., de Assis Martorano, S. A., & Arroio, A. (2015). Reflections
About Teaching Nature of Science Mediated by Images. Reflections,
12(1).
Creswell, J.W. (2012). Educational Research Planning, Conducting and
Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research.Boston: Pearson.
Downing, S.M. &Yudkowsky, R. (2009). Assessment in Health Professions
Education. New York and London: Routledge.[Online].Retrived from
http://www.books.google.co.id.[Accessed on October 31, 2015].
Duschl, R. A., & Grandy, R. (2013). Two views about explicitly teaching nature
of science. Science & Education, 22(9), 2109-2139.
Erickson, F. (2012).Qualitative research methods for science education.InSecond
international handbook of science education (pp. 1451-1469).Springer
Netherlands. [Online]. Retrived from http://ksu.edu.sa. [Accessed on July
19, 2016].
Ferrando, P. J. (2012). Assessing the Discriminating Power of Item and Test
Scores in the Linear Factor-Analysis Model.Psicologica: International
Journal of Methodology and Experimental Psychology, 33(1), 111-134.
Amaira Utami, 2016
THE PROFILE OF STUDENTS NATURE OF SCIENCE (NOS) ON INTERACTION OF ORGTANISMS AND
ITS ENVIRONMENT TOPIC AT SEKOLAH INDONESIA KUALA LUMPUR
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu | perpustakaan.upi.edu
63
Forehand, M. (2010).Bloom’s taxonomy.Emerging perspectives on learning,
teaching
and
technology,
41-47.[Online].Retrived
from
http://www.edumoodle.at.[Accessed on October 28, 2015].
Fraenkel, J.R., Wallen, N.E., & Hyun, H.H. (2007).How to Design and Evaluate
Research in Education. San Francisco: McGraw Hill.
Garner-O’Neale, L., & Ogunkola, B. (2015). Effects of Interest in Science, Study
Habits, Sex and Level of Study on the Nature of Science Literacy Level of
Undergraduate Chemistry Students of the University of the West Indies,
Barbados. Journal of Educational and Social Research, 5(2), 267.
Hadi, A. N. (2014). Utilization of Biopuppet Learning Media through the
Implementation of Problem Based Learning Strategy to Improve Students’
Learning Interest and Understanding.
Hayes, K. N., &Trexler, C. J. (2016).Testing predictors of instructional practice in
elementary
science
education:
The
significant
role
of
accountability. Science Education, 100(2), 266-289.
Hollar, S. (2012).Ecology: The Delicate Balance of Life on Earth. The
environment: ours to save. New York: The Rosen Publishing Group.
[Online].Retrived from http://www.books.google.co.id.[Accessed on
November 6, 2015].
Hsin, M. C., Chien, S. P., Hsu, Y. S., Lin, C. Y., & Yore, L. D.
(2016).Development and validation of a Taiwanese communication
progression in science education. International Journal of Science and
Mathematics Education, 14(1), 125-143.
Johnson, G., Gaspar, A., Boyer, N., Bennett, C., &Armitage, W. (2012).Applying
the revised Bloom's taxonomy of the cognitive domain to linux system
administration assessments.Journal of Computing Sciences in Colleges,
28(2), 238-247.
Jorgensen, S.E. (2009). Ecosystem Ecology. Amsterdam: Academic Press.
[Online].Retrived from http://www.books.google.co.id.[Accessed on
November 6, 2015].
Kaplan, R.M., &Saccuzzo, D.P. (2012).Psychological Testing: Principles,
Applications, & Issues. San Diego: Wadsworth Cengage Learning.
Kim, M. K., & Cho, M. K. (2015). The Study of Constructed-Response
Assessment of Elementary Mathematics Education in Korea. Eurasia
Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 11(2), 299311.
Amaira Utami, 2016
THE PROFILE OF STUDENTS NATURE OF SCIENCE (NOS) ON INTERACTION OF ORGTANISMS AND
ITS ENVIRONMENT TOPIC AT SEKOLAH INDONESIA KUALA LUMPUR
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu | perpustakaan.upi.edu
64
Krathwohl, D. R. (2002). A revision of Bloom's taxonomy: An overview. Theory
into
practice,
41(4),
212-218.[Online].Retrived
from
http://www.wikispaces.net.[Accessed on October 28, 2015].
Lederman, N. G., Abd‐El‐Khalick, F., Bell, R. L., & Schwartz, R. S. (2002).
Views of nature of science questionnaire: Toward valid and meaningful
assessment of learners' conceptions of nature of science. Journal of
research in science teaching, 39(6), 497-521.
Lightner, J. &Hennigan, T. (2013).The Ecology Book: Wonders of Creation. :
New
Leaf
Publishing
Group.
[Online].Retrived
from
http://www.books.google.co.id.[Accessed on November 6, 2015].
Liu, X. (2010).Using and Developing Measurement Instruments in Science
Education: A Researh Modeling Approach (Hc). United States: IAP.
[Online].Retrived from http://www.books.google.co.id.[Accessed on
October 31, 2015].
Long, D. A., Mitchell, M. L., Young, J., & Rickard, C. M. (2014).Assessing core
outcomes in graduates: psychometric evaluation of the Paediatric Intensive
Care Unit‐Nursing Knowledge and Skills Test. Journal of advanced
nursing, 70(3), 698-708.
Martin, M., Mullis, I. V., & Foy, P. (2015). TIMSS 2015 assessment design.
TIMSS, 85-99. [Online]. Retrived from http://www.bc.edu. [Accessed on
January 25, 2016].
Mastascusa, E.J., Synder, W,J., & Hoyt, B.S. (2011). Effective Instruction for
STEM Disciplines: From Learning Theory to College Teaching. San
Francisco:
John
Wiley
&
Sons.
[Online].Retrived
from
http://www.books.google.co.id.[Accessed on October 31, 2015].
Matthews, M. R. (2012). Changing the focus: From nature of science (NOS) to
features of science (FOS). In Advances in nature of science research (pp.
3-26). Springer Netherlands.
McComas, W. F., Clough, M. P., & Almazroa, H. (1998). The role and character
of the nature of science in science education. In The nature of science in
science education (pp. 3-39). Springer Netherlands.
McDonald, M.E. (2014). The Nurse Educator’s Guide to Assessing Learning
Outcomes. Brooklyn: Jones & Bartlett Publishers. [Online].Retrived from
http://www.books.google.co.id.[Accessed on October 30, 2015].
Amaira Utami, 2016
THE PROFILE OF STUDENTS NATURE OF SCIENCE (NOS) ON INTERACTION OF ORGTANISMS AND
ITS ENVIRONMENT TOPIC AT SEKOLAH INDONESIA KUALA LUMPUR
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu | perpustakaan.upi.edu
65
McFarlane, D. A. (2013).Understanding the challenges of science education in the
21st century: New opportunities for scientific literacy. International
Letters of Social and Humanistic Sciences, 4(1), 35-44. [
Militaru, G., Pollifroni, M., &Niculescu, C. (2015, November). The Role of
Technology Entrepreneurship Education in Encouraging to Launch New
Ventures. In Balkan Region Conference on Engineering and Business
Education (Vol. 1, No. 1).
Molles, M.C. (2013). Ecology Concept and Applications. Mexico: McGraw-Hill
Education.
Mourgues, C., Tan, M., Hein, S., Elliott, J. G., &Grigorenko, E. L. (2016). Using
creativity to predict future academic performance: An application of
Aurora's five subtests for creativity. Learning and Individual Differences.
Pianka,
E.R.
(2011).
Evolutionary
Ecology.[Online].Retrived
http://www.books.google.co.id.[Accessed on November 6, 2015].
from
Plucker, J. A., Beghetto, R. A., & Dow, G. T. (2004). Why isn't creativity more
important to educational psychologists? Potentials, pitfalls, and future
directions in creativity research. Educational psychologist, 39(2), 83-96.
Reece, J.B., Urry, L.A., Cain, M.L., Wasserman, S.A., Minorsky, P.V., &
Jackson, R.B.(2011). Campbell Biology. Boston: Pearson.
Schleigh, S. P., Clark, D. B., & Menekse, M. (2015). Constructed-response as an
alternative to interviews in conceptual change studies: Students’
explanations of force. International Journal of Education in Mathematics,
Science and Technology, 3(1), 14-36.
Schmitz, O.J. (2013). Ecology and Ecosystem Conservation. Washington, D.C:
Island
Press.
[Online].Retrived
from
http://www.books.google.co.id.[Accessed on November 6, 2015].
Schwartz, R. S., Lederman, N. G., & Abd‐el‐Khalick, F. (2012). A series of
misrepresentations: A response to Allchin's whole approach to assessing
nature of science understandings. Science Education, 96(4), 685-692.
Simkin, M. G., &Kuechler, W. L. (2005). Multiple‐Choice Tests and Student
Understanding: What Is the Connection?.Decision Sciences Journal of
Innovative Education, 3(1), 73-98.
Amaira Utami, 2016
THE PROFILE OF STUDENTS NATURE OF SCIENCE (NOS) ON INTERACTION OF ORGTANISMS AND
ITS ENVIRONMENT TOPIC AT SEKOLAH INDONESIA KUALA LUMPUR
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu | perpustakaan.upi.edu
66
Tomak, L., &Bek, Y. (2015).Item analysis and evaluation in the examinations in
the faculty of medicine at OndokuzMayis University.Nigerian journal of
clinical practice, 18(3), 387-394.
Weathers, K.C. (2012).Fundamental of Ecosystem Science. London: Academic
Press. [Online].Retrived from http://www.books.google.co.id.[Accessed
on November 6, 2015].
Xu, D., & Chi, M. T. (2016).Bridging Emergent Attributes and Darwinian
Principles in Teaching Natural Selection.
Yuan, W., Deng, C., Zhu, H., & Li, J. (2013). The Statistical Analysis and
Evaluation of Examination Results of Materials Research Methods Course.
Creative Education, 3(07), 162.
Amaira Utami, 2016
THE PROFILE OF STUDENTS NATURE OF SCIENCE (NOS) ON INTERACTION OF ORGTANISMS AND
ITS ENVIRONMENT TOPIC AT SEKOLAH INDONESIA KUALA LUMPUR
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu | perpustakaan.upi.edu