Direktur Riset Dan PPM PROF WAWAN
Kebijakan dan Strategi Ditjen Penguatan
Riset dan Pengembangan IPTEK DIKTI
Dalam Rangka Meningkatkan Mutu PT
Ocky Karna Radjasa
Direktur Riset dan Pengabdian Masyarakat
Kemenristek Dikti
Ranking Systems - Criteria and
Weighting
Academic
Ranking of
World
Universities
(ARWU)
Per Capita Performance, 10%
CI/SSCI/A&HCI Arcles, 20%
Nobel/Fields Medal
Alumni, 10%
QS World University
Rankings
(QS-WUR)
Citations Per Faculty,
20%
Nobel/Fields Medal
Winner, 20% Int'l Student, 5%
Research volume,
income and reputaAcademic Peer
tion, 30%
Review, 40%
Int'l Faculty, 5%
Nature/Science Articles, 20%
HiCi Reseracher, 20%
Student Faculty Ratio,
20%
Times Higher
Education of
World University
Ranking (THE)
Teaching & learnin
environment, 30%
Research Income from
Industry, 2.5%
Employer Review,
10%
Int'l Staff and Student,
5%
Citations, Per Paper,
32.5%
Source: Dr. Kevin Downing, City Hongkong University
Targetted outputs of Research in
University
Research
Productivity:
-No. papers
published in
international
peer-reviewed
journal
-No . competitive
research grants
- No. IPR
Research
Impact:
- No. citation
- No. research
based-teaching
materials
- No. research
based-teaching
books
- Outreach
Attractiveness and
Competitiveness
Survival of University
Research
excellence:
-No. highly cited
papers
- H-index
- No. publication in
highly impact
journals
- No. CoE
Citation index and Impact
factor
• Science citation index: Indicates how many times
the work of one author has been referred to, or
cited, by another author.
• Journal Impact Factor (JIF) provided by Journal
Citation Report: It is a measure of the frequency
with which the "average article" in a journal has
been cited in a given period of time.
H-index
THE-QS World University Rankings
International Staff 5%
Score calculated based on
the proportion of Full Time
Equivalent (FTE) faculty that
are international.
Citation/Staff 20%
Score based on research
performance factored against
the size of the research body .
Five years of publication data
with citations from Scopus.
Number of citations is divided
by the number of FTE staff to
give an indication of the
density of research.
International
5%
Score calculated based on
the proportion of total
students
that
areAcademic Peer Review 40%
international.
Academics indicate which field
they specialise in and then list
up to 30 universities they regard
as leaders in this field.
Composite score drawn from
peer review survey (which is
divided into five subject areas).
THE-QS
Results compiled based on three
Ranking
years’ worth of responses
s
totaling 6,354 in 2008.
Safeguards against individuals
voting for their own university
strengthened.
Rise of Asian universities is least
apparent in this ranking.
Staff/Student 20%
Student
Score based simply on the student
faculty ratio, the higher the number
of faculty per student the higher the
score.
Full- and part-time numbers for staff
and students obtained; FTEs used
throughout as far as possible.
Employer Review 10%
Score based on responses to employer
survey. 2,339 responses in 2008.
Recruiter names are sourced through
QS databases, media partners and
partner schools & universities.
Responses are weighted by region to
reach a final score.
Measuring Research
Quality
Classic measure of
research quality
Citations per staff
member (not per paper)
Number of publication
per staff
Source: Scopus
(http://www.scopus.com
12/6/09
PERBANDINGAN PUBLIKASI TERINDEKS SCOPUS
Sumber: SCIMAGO Journal Ranking
(http://www.scimagojr.com)
PERBANDINGAN JUMLAH SITASI TERINDEKS DI
SCOPUS
Sumber: SCIMAGO Journal Ranking
(http://www.scimagojr.com)
Scopus-indexed publications
•
•
•
•
Research article
Review
Proceeding
Book/book chapter
Penilaian Kinerja Penelitian PT Pemetaan DP2M DIKTI – TOLOK UKUR
No Komponen
Bobot
(%)
1
Jumlah dosen berdasarkan strata
10
(SDM)
2
Penelitian pada pusat
10
studi/pusat kajian
3
Penelitian dosen dengan dana
20
DP2M DIKTI
4
Luaran Penelitian
35
5 Variabel
Manajemen
LP/LPPM
15
Pendukung:
Aktivitas pusat studi di luar kegiatan penelitian
Ketersediaan sarana dan prasarana penelitian
Ketersediaan payung penelitian/road map pusat
studi
Student body
1. Publikasi Ilmiah
2. Hak Atas Kekayaan
Intelektual (HKI)
3. Teknologi Tepat
Guna
4. Model/Prototype/De
sain/Karya seni/
Rekayasa Sosial
5. Buku Ajar (ISBN)
6. Angka partisipasi
dosen dalam
penelitian
7. Visiting Lecturer
8. Keynote Speaker
dalam pertemuan
ilmiah
Jumlah Publikasi terindeks di Scopus
(per 17/08/2015)
No
Institution
Documents
1
ITB
4694
2
UI
3855
3
UGM
2185
4
IPB
1760
5
LIPI
1375
6
ITS
1256
7
CIFOR
963
8
UB
877
9
UNDIP
835
10
UNPAD
784
Daftar Perguruan Tinggi Terbaik Indonesia 2015
RIP INSTITUSI – TOPIK dan ROAD
MAP
RIP INSTITUSI
TOPIK PENELITIAN
20182015-17
2012-14
ROAD MAP
PENELITIAN
Level
Institusi/Pusat
Level Pusat
Penelitian/Fak
15
STRUKTUR ORGANISASI KEMENTERIAN RISET,
TEKNOLOGI, DAN DIKTI
(Perpres No. 13/2015)
Menteri Riset, Teknologi,
dan Pendidikan Tinggi
Staf Ahli*)
Sekretariat
Jenderal
Inspektorat
Jenderal
Ditjen
Pembelajaran,
Kemahasiswaa
n dan
Penjaminan
Mutu
Ditjen
Kelembagaan
IPTEK dan
DIKTI
Ditjen
Sumber
Daya
IPTEK dan
DIKTI
PUSDIKLA
T
Kelompok
Jabatan
Fungsional
Ditjen
Penguatan
Riset dan
Pengembanga
n
PUSDATI
N
PUSKERM
A
Ditjen
Penguatan
Inovasi
PUSKOMIN
FO
PUSPIPTEK
PT &
L2DIKTI
LPNK
Struktur Organisasi
Direktorat Jenderal Penguatan Riset
dan Pengembangan
Luaran Insinas 2015:
Surat Keputusan Menristekdikti No. 147
Tanggal 9 April 2015
No
Jenis Luaran
Laporan di Akhir
Kontrak
1
Prototipe (Laboratorium /
Industri)
Dokumen (Desain, Foto,
Deskripsi, Spesifikasi, dll)
2
Teknologi Proses /
Produk
Dokumen (Formula,
3
Teori / Konsep / Metode
Baru
Dokumen (Deskripsi, Kebaruan,
dll)
4
Paten, PVT, dll
Draft (Paten, PVT, dll)
Foto/Gambar, Deskripsi, Spesifikasi,
dll)
*) No. 1 &Publikasi
2 Satu paket (salahJurnal
satu diperoleh
yang lain
Nas
/ juga diperoleh).
**)5No. 4 & 5 Penyampaian laporan masih berlanjut hingga diperoleh
kepastian Granted / terbit atau tidak.
Manuskrip
Intnl.
DISTRIBUSI LOKASI INSINAS
Distribusi Institusi / Lembaga:
Riset dan Pengembangan IPTEK DIKTI
Dalam Rangka Meningkatkan Mutu PT
Ocky Karna Radjasa
Direktur Riset dan Pengabdian Masyarakat
Kemenristek Dikti
Ranking Systems - Criteria and
Weighting
Academic
Ranking of
World
Universities
(ARWU)
Per Capita Performance, 10%
CI/SSCI/A&HCI Arcles, 20%
Nobel/Fields Medal
Alumni, 10%
QS World University
Rankings
(QS-WUR)
Citations Per Faculty,
20%
Nobel/Fields Medal
Winner, 20% Int'l Student, 5%
Research volume,
income and reputaAcademic Peer
tion, 30%
Review, 40%
Int'l Faculty, 5%
Nature/Science Articles, 20%
HiCi Reseracher, 20%
Student Faculty Ratio,
20%
Times Higher
Education of
World University
Ranking (THE)
Teaching & learnin
environment, 30%
Research Income from
Industry, 2.5%
Employer Review,
10%
Int'l Staff and Student,
5%
Citations, Per Paper,
32.5%
Source: Dr. Kevin Downing, City Hongkong University
Targetted outputs of Research in
University
Research
Productivity:
-No. papers
published in
international
peer-reviewed
journal
-No . competitive
research grants
- No. IPR
Research
Impact:
- No. citation
- No. research
based-teaching
materials
- No. research
based-teaching
books
- Outreach
Attractiveness and
Competitiveness
Survival of University
Research
excellence:
-No. highly cited
papers
- H-index
- No. publication in
highly impact
journals
- No. CoE
Citation index and Impact
factor
• Science citation index: Indicates how many times
the work of one author has been referred to, or
cited, by another author.
• Journal Impact Factor (JIF) provided by Journal
Citation Report: It is a measure of the frequency
with which the "average article" in a journal has
been cited in a given period of time.
H-index
THE-QS World University Rankings
International Staff 5%
Score calculated based on
the proportion of Full Time
Equivalent (FTE) faculty that
are international.
Citation/Staff 20%
Score based on research
performance factored against
the size of the research body .
Five years of publication data
with citations from Scopus.
Number of citations is divided
by the number of FTE staff to
give an indication of the
density of research.
International
5%
Score calculated based on
the proportion of total
students
that
areAcademic Peer Review 40%
international.
Academics indicate which field
they specialise in and then list
up to 30 universities they regard
as leaders in this field.
Composite score drawn from
peer review survey (which is
divided into five subject areas).
THE-QS
Results compiled based on three
Ranking
years’ worth of responses
s
totaling 6,354 in 2008.
Safeguards against individuals
voting for their own university
strengthened.
Rise of Asian universities is least
apparent in this ranking.
Staff/Student 20%
Student
Score based simply on the student
faculty ratio, the higher the number
of faculty per student the higher the
score.
Full- and part-time numbers for staff
and students obtained; FTEs used
throughout as far as possible.
Employer Review 10%
Score based on responses to employer
survey. 2,339 responses in 2008.
Recruiter names are sourced through
QS databases, media partners and
partner schools & universities.
Responses are weighted by region to
reach a final score.
Measuring Research
Quality
Classic measure of
research quality
Citations per staff
member (not per paper)
Number of publication
per staff
Source: Scopus
(http://www.scopus.com
12/6/09
PERBANDINGAN PUBLIKASI TERINDEKS SCOPUS
Sumber: SCIMAGO Journal Ranking
(http://www.scimagojr.com)
PERBANDINGAN JUMLAH SITASI TERINDEKS DI
SCOPUS
Sumber: SCIMAGO Journal Ranking
(http://www.scimagojr.com)
Scopus-indexed publications
•
•
•
•
Research article
Review
Proceeding
Book/book chapter
Penilaian Kinerja Penelitian PT Pemetaan DP2M DIKTI – TOLOK UKUR
No Komponen
Bobot
(%)
1
Jumlah dosen berdasarkan strata
10
(SDM)
2
Penelitian pada pusat
10
studi/pusat kajian
3
Penelitian dosen dengan dana
20
DP2M DIKTI
4
Luaran Penelitian
35
5 Variabel
Manajemen
LP/LPPM
15
Pendukung:
Aktivitas pusat studi di luar kegiatan penelitian
Ketersediaan sarana dan prasarana penelitian
Ketersediaan payung penelitian/road map pusat
studi
Student body
1. Publikasi Ilmiah
2. Hak Atas Kekayaan
Intelektual (HKI)
3. Teknologi Tepat
Guna
4. Model/Prototype/De
sain/Karya seni/
Rekayasa Sosial
5. Buku Ajar (ISBN)
6. Angka partisipasi
dosen dalam
penelitian
7. Visiting Lecturer
8. Keynote Speaker
dalam pertemuan
ilmiah
Jumlah Publikasi terindeks di Scopus
(per 17/08/2015)
No
Institution
Documents
1
ITB
4694
2
UI
3855
3
UGM
2185
4
IPB
1760
5
LIPI
1375
6
ITS
1256
7
CIFOR
963
8
UB
877
9
UNDIP
835
10
UNPAD
784
Daftar Perguruan Tinggi Terbaik Indonesia 2015
RIP INSTITUSI – TOPIK dan ROAD
MAP
RIP INSTITUSI
TOPIK PENELITIAN
20182015-17
2012-14
ROAD MAP
PENELITIAN
Level
Institusi/Pusat
Level Pusat
Penelitian/Fak
15
STRUKTUR ORGANISASI KEMENTERIAN RISET,
TEKNOLOGI, DAN DIKTI
(Perpres No. 13/2015)
Menteri Riset, Teknologi,
dan Pendidikan Tinggi
Staf Ahli*)
Sekretariat
Jenderal
Inspektorat
Jenderal
Ditjen
Pembelajaran,
Kemahasiswaa
n dan
Penjaminan
Mutu
Ditjen
Kelembagaan
IPTEK dan
DIKTI
Ditjen
Sumber
Daya
IPTEK dan
DIKTI
PUSDIKLA
T
Kelompok
Jabatan
Fungsional
Ditjen
Penguatan
Riset dan
Pengembanga
n
PUSDATI
N
PUSKERM
A
Ditjen
Penguatan
Inovasi
PUSKOMIN
FO
PUSPIPTEK
PT &
L2DIKTI
LPNK
Struktur Organisasi
Direktorat Jenderal Penguatan Riset
dan Pengembangan
Luaran Insinas 2015:
Surat Keputusan Menristekdikti No. 147
Tanggal 9 April 2015
No
Jenis Luaran
Laporan di Akhir
Kontrak
1
Prototipe (Laboratorium /
Industri)
Dokumen (Desain, Foto,
Deskripsi, Spesifikasi, dll)
2
Teknologi Proses /
Produk
Dokumen (Formula,
3
Teori / Konsep / Metode
Baru
Dokumen (Deskripsi, Kebaruan,
dll)
4
Paten, PVT, dll
Draft (Paten, PVT, dll)
Foto/Gambar, Deskripsi, Spesifikasi,
dll)
*) No. 1 &Publikasi
2 Satu paket (salahJurnal
satu diperoleh
yang lain
Nas
/ juga diperoleh).
**)5No. 4 & 5 Penyampaian laporan masih berlanjut hingga diperoleh
kepastian Granted / terbit atau tidak.
Manuskrip
Intnl.
DISTRIBUSI LOKASI INSINAS
Distribusi Institusi / Lembaga: