H1S5 ASIIN Outcomes Assessemen Prodi S1 Fisika - AI
Strategi Asesmen
Capaian Pembelajaran
S1 Fisika
Alexander A. Iskandar
Workshop Nasional Strategi Meraih Akreditasi Internasional
Institut Teknologi Bandung, 18-19 April 2017
PEO – PLO – PC – Assessments
Traits of Graduates
(Educational Objectives)
Mastery
(Learning Outcome)
Competence
(Performance
Criteria)
Competence
(Performance
Criteria)
Mastery
(Learning
Outcome)
Assessments
Competence
(Performance
Criteria)
Workshop Nasional Strategi Meraih Akreditasi Internasional, 18 - 19 April 2017
2
PEO
Undergraduate Program in Physics
• Program Educational Objectives (PEO) are
content-related specification of the quality of a
degree programme.
• The Undergraduate Programme in Physics, ITB,
focuses its objectives to produce graduates that
are capable to become professionals, such as
researchers, lecturers, teachers, industrial experts
as well as entrepreneurs.
Workshop Nasional Strategi Meraih Akreditasi Internasional, 18 - 19 April 2017
3
PEO
Undergraduate Program in Physics
PEO of UPP
1 Mastering knowledge and methodology of physics, and having a
problem solving capability in their work.
2 Having a capability to continuously develop knowledge for further
study, either formally or informally.
3 Mastering scientific methods for observing, analysing, and
understanding of physical phenomena, in addition to mastering
induction as well as deduction methods and their applications to
support their career.
4 Keeping with development on their physics fields of interest and their
interactions with science and technology, industry and life in general.
5 Having a capability to communicate ideas orally and in writing, either
scientifically or popularly, to take appropriate initiatives, and to lead a
4
Workshop
Strategi Meraih
Akreditasi Internasional, 18 - 19 April 2017
working group
inNasional
relevant
fields.
Program Learning Outcomes of
Undergraduate Program in Physics
PLO of UPP
1 They are able to demonstrate their knowledge of classical and
modern physics by identifying physical properties of a physical system.
2 They are able to formulate a standard physical system into a physical
model by using mathematics.
3 They are able to solve problems of a standard physical system
comprehensively by the use of mathematics and computational
tools.
4 They are able to analyse a physical system by applying mathematics
and computational tools/ICT.
5 They are able to design and conduct experiments in physics or
related physics areas, and to acquire, analyse and interpret the resulting
Workshop Nasional Strategi Meraih Akreditasi Internasional, 18 - 19 April 2017
data.
7
Program Learning Outcomes
of UPP
PLO of UPP
6 They have a basic capability in oral communication and in writing
scientific report in an appropriate scientific style.
7 They are able to work effectively, both individually and in group.
8 They are able to apply knowledge of physics to broader
areas/interdisciplinary problems.
9 They have basic characters of a good scientist.
10 They have an ability to improve their knowledge and be able to
continue their study in a higher degree program.
Workshop Nasional Strategi Meraih Akreditasi Internasional, 18 - 19 April 2017
8
Correspondence of
PLO and PEO
Objective 1 Objective 2 Objective 3 Objective 4 Objective 5
Outcome 1
S
S
S
S
S
Outcome 2
S
S
S
S
S
Outcome 3
S
S
S
S
S
Outcome 4
S
S
S
S
S
Outcome 5
S
M
S
M
S
Outcome 6
S
M
S
S
M
Outcome 7
S
S
S
M
S
Outcome 8
S
M
S
M
S
Outcome 9
S
M
S
M
S
Outcome 10
M
M
M
M
S
Workshop Nasional Strategi Meraih Akreditasi Internasional, 18 - 19 April 2017
9
Mapping Between
Courses and PLO
No
Code
Course
Name
1 MA1101 Mathematics
IA
2 FI1101
Elementary
Physics IA
3 KI1101 Basic
Chemistry IA
CU PLO PLO PLO PLO PLO PLO PLO PLO PLO PLO
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
4
X
4 (1)
X
X
X
X
X
3
Workshop Nasional Strategi Meraih Akreditasi Internasional, 18 - 19 April 2017
X
8
Alignment between
PLO and SSC
PLO
SSC
Workshop Nasional Strategi Meraih Akreditasi Internasional, 18 - 19 April 2017
11
Subject Specific Criteria
• PLO should be inline with the Subject Specific
Criteria (SSC) of ASIIN.
• The SSC set by ASIIN are the result of an
assessment, regularly performed by ASIIN
Technical Committees, which summarize what is
considered as good practice by a professional
community formed equally by academics and
professional practitioners in higher education
and is required as future-oriented quality of
training in the labour market.
Workshop Nasional Strategi Meraih Akreditasi Internasional, 18 - 19 April 2017
12
SSC for Physics
• With their knowledge and skills graduates of
Bachelor’s degree programmes in physics have a
qualification based on sound fundamentals of
natural sciences and mathematics, certain key
qualifications, and a high degree of flexibility
which, in particular, provides an excellent basis
for further qualification and specialisation.
• They are principally qualified to complete
corresponding Master’s degree programmes.
Workshop Nasional Strategi Meraih Akreditasi Internasional, 18 - 19 April 2017
13
Alignment between
SSC ASIIN – PLO UPP
ASIIN Subject Specific Criteria for
Physics (ASIIN -SSC)
Program Learning Outcomes
(PLO) of UPP
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
They have sound knowledge of classical physics
(mechanics, electrodynamics, thermo-dynamics,
1 vibrations, waves and optics) and are familiar with the
x
fundamentals of quantum, atomic and molecular, nuclear,
elementary particle and solid state physics.
They are familiar with important mathematical
2 methods used in physics and can use these to solve
x
physics problems.
They have an extensive understanding of the
fundamental principles of physics, their inherent
relation and mathematical formulation and, based
3 on this, have acquired methods suitable for
x
theoretical analysis, modelling and simulation of
Workshop Nasional Strategi Meraih Akreditasi Internasional, 18 - 19 April 2017
relevant processes.
14
Alignment between
SSC ASIIN – PLO UPP
ASIIN Subject Specific Criteria for Physics (ASIIN -SSC)
Program Learning Outcomes
(PLO) of UPP
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
They have applied their knowledge to physics problems
in an exemplary manner and studied some areas in
4
x
greater depth, thereby acquiring a first basis for
problem solving competence.
They have a basic capacity to comprehend physics
x
5 problems. This will in general however not yet facilitate
a deeper understanding of current research areas.
They are therefore in a position to independently
classify physics-based and to some extent also
interdisciplinary problems that require a target6 oriented and logic-based approach, and to analyse
and/or solve them by using natural scientific and
Workshop Nasional Strategi Meraih Akreditasi Internasional, 18 - 19 April 2017
mathematical methods.
x
15
Alignment between
SSC ASIIN – PLO UPP
ASIIN Subject Specific Criteria for Physics (ASIIN -SSC)
Program Learning Outcomes
(PLO) of UPP
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
They are familiar with basic principles of
experimentation, are able to use modern physics
7
measurement methods, and are in a position to assess
the significance of results correctly.
They have generally also acquired an overview
8 knowledge in selected other natural science subjects
or technical disciplines.
They are able to apply their knowledge to different
fields and act responsibly in their professional activity.
They are moreover able to recognize new trends in
9
their subject area and integrate the relevant
methodology – possibly after appropriate qualification
Workshop Nasional Strategi Meraih Akreditasi Internasional, 18 - 19 April 2017
– into their further work.
x
x
x
16
Alignment between
SSC ASIIN – PLO UPP
Program Learning Outcomes
ASIIN Subject Specific Criteria for Physics (ASIIN -SSC)
(PLO) of UPP
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
They are able to continuously and self-reliantly extend
and deepen the knowledge acquired in the Bachelor's
degree program. They are familiar with suitable learning
10
strategies (lifelong learning) for this; they are in
particular capable of a consecutive Master's degree
program in principle.
They have gained initial experience with regard to
generic qualifications (e.g. time management, study
and work techniques, willingness to cooperate, capacity
11
for teamwork, ability to communicate, rules of good
scientific practice) in their degree program, and are able
to develop these skills further.
They have learnt communication techniques and are
12 familiar with the basic elements of the relevant
Workshop Nasional Strategi Meraih Akreditasi Internasional, 18 - 19 April 2017
specialized English.
x
x
x
x
17
Alignment between
SSC ASIIN – PLO UPP
ASIIN Subject Specific Criteria for Physics
(ASIIN -SSC)
Program Learning Outcomes
(PLO) of UPP
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
They are able to solve a simple scientific problem and to
13 present their results orally (lecture) and in writing
(demonstrated in a Bachelor’s thesis).
Workshop Nasional Strategi Meraih Akreditasi Internasional, 18 - 19 April 2017
x
18
PLO and its
Performance Criteria (PC)
• Performance Criteria (PC) of each PLO are a list
of competences that indicate the successful
achievement of the corresponding PLO.
• Assessment of these achievements is done
regularly with an evaluation rubric.
Workshop Nasional Strategi Meraih Akreditasi Internasional, 18 - 19 April 2017
19
PLO – PC Assessment
Workshop Nasional Strategi Meraih Akreditasi Internasional, 18 - 19 April 2017
20
18
PLO – PC Assessment Sources
PLO
PLO Descriptions
Assessment Sources
1
They are able to demonstrate their knowledge of
classical and modern physics by identifying physical
properties of a physical system.
2
They are able to formulate a standard physical
student’s exam
system into a physical model by using mathematics.
student’s exam
They are able to solve problems of a standard
physical system comprehensively by the use of
mathematics and computational tools.
They are able to analyse a physical system by
student’s exam
applying mathematics and computational tools/ICT.
They are able to design and conduct experiments in
student’s laboratory reports,
physics or related physics areas, and to acquire,
laboratory assistance’s notes
analyse and interpret the resulting data
They have a basic capability in oral communication
student’s laboratory reports,
and in writing scientific report in an appropriate
laboratory assistance’s notes,
Workshop Nasional Strategi Meraih Akreditasi Internasional, 18 - 19 April 2017
scientific style
Final Project report 21 19
3
4
5
6
student’s exam
PLO – PC Assessment Sources
PLO
PLO Descriptions
7
They are able to work effectively, both
individually
and in a group
8
They are able to apply knowledge of physics to
broader areas / interdisciplinary problems
9
They have basic characters of a good scientist
10
Assessment Sources
questionnaire and lecturer’s
notes of Independent Study course,
Final Project, courses with RBL,
courses with lab. works
the number of Elective Courses
from other study programmes and
interdiciplinary elective courses within
the study programme listed in graduate’s
transcript
questionnaire, lecturer’s notes of
Independent Study course,
Final Project, courses with RBL,
courses with lab. works
graduate’s transcript
They have an ability to improve their
knowledgeWorkshop
and beNasional
able to
continue their study
Strategi Meraih Akreditasi Internasional, 18 - 19 April 2017
in higher degree programme
20
Assessment Rubric
• Learning Outcome 1:
They are able to demonstrate their knowledge of classical
and modern physics by identifying physical properties of a
physical system
No
1
PC
Rating 4
Rating 3
Rating 2
Based on
Based on
midterm exam
midterm exam
and/or final exam, and/or final exam,
students showed students could
their ability to
identify/explain
identify/explain
only part of the
concepts and
concepts and
physical quantities physical quantities
in a physical
in a physical
system correctly.
system correctly
but less
completely.
Workshop Nasional Strategi Meraih Akreditasi Internasional, 18 - 19 April 2017
Demonstrate
knowledge of
classical and
modern physics
by identify a
physical system
Based on
midterm exam
and/or final exam,
students showed
their ability to
identify/explain
concepts and
physical quantities
in a physical
system correctly
and completely.
Rating 1
Based on midterm
exam and/or final
exam, students
could not able to
identify/explain
correctly the
concepts and
physical quantities
in a physical
system.
23
Assessment Rubric
• Learning Outcome 5:
They are able to design and conduct experiments
in physics or related physics areas, and to acquire,
analyze and interpret the resulting data
No
1
PC
Demonstrate
ability to plan
and prepare
practical
laboratory
investigation
Rating 4
In their reports
students wrote
experiment
plan correctly
and completely
Rating 3
In their reports
students wrote
experiment
plan correctly
but
incompletely
Rating 2
In their reports
students wrote
experiment
plan but
partially are
incorrect.
Workshop Nasional Strategi Meraih Akreditasi Internasional, 18 - 19 April 2017
Rating 1
In their reports
students
incorrectly
wrote
experiment
plan.
24
Assessment Rubric
No
2
PC
Demonstrate ability
to conduct
experiment and to
record data using a
variety of suitable
instrument in a
responsible and in
compliant way to the
relevant health and
safety regulations.
Rating 4
Laboratory
assistants
reported that
students carried
out the
experiment
correctly and
completely.
Laboratory
assistants
reported that
students carried
out their
experiment by
taking related
safety procedures
into consideration.
Rating 3
Laboratory
assistants
reported that
students carried
out the
experiment
correctly but less
completely.
Laboratory
assistants
reported that
students carried
out their
experiment by
taking most of all
related safety
procedures into
consideration.
Rating 2
Laboratory
assistants
reported that
students carried
out the
experiment
correctly but
incompletely.
Laboratory
assistants
reported that
students carried
out their
experiment by
taking, but only
partially, related
safety procedures
into consideration.
Workshop Nasional Strategi Meraih Akreditasi Internasional, 18 - 19 April 2017
Alexander A. Iskandar
Rating 1
Laboratory
assistants
reported that
students carried
out the
experiment
incorrectly.
Laboratory
assistants
reported that
students carried
out their
experiment
without
considering safety
procedures.
23
Assessment Rubric
No
2
PC
Demonstrate ability
to conduct
experiment and to
record data using a
variety of suitable
instrument in a
responsible and in
compliant way to the
relevant health and
safety regulations.
Rating 4
In their reports
students wrote
experiment
data in tables
and graphs.
The tables and
graphs are
numbered and
explained.
Rating 3
In their
reports
students wrote
experiment
data in tables
and graphs.
The tables and
graphs are
explained.
Rating 2
In their
reports
students wrote
experiment
data in tables
and graphs.
The tables and
graphs are
partially
explained.
Workshop Nasional Strategi Meraih Akreditasi Internasional, 18 - 19 April 2017
Rating 1
In their
reports
students wrote
experiment
data in tables
and graphs.
No
explanation on
the tables and
graphs.
24
Assessment Rubric
No
3
PC
Demonstrate
ability to
analyze and
interpret
resulting data
using
knowledge of
mathematics
and physics
Rating 4
In their
experimental
report students
discussed the
relationship
between
physical
variables and
analyzed their
trends.
Rating 3
In their
experimental
report students
incompletely
discussed the
relationship
between
physical
variables and
analyzed their
trends.
Rating 2
In their
experimental
report students
discussed the
relationship
between
physical
variables
without
analyzing their
trends.
Workshop Nasional Strategi Meraih Akreditasi Internasional, 18 - 19 April 2017
Rating 1
In their
experimental
report students
didn’t discuss
the relationship
between
physical
variables.
26
Assessment Plan
• Assessment is scheduled periodically (end of
semester or end of academic year).
• A task force (GKM Prodi and Asisten Akademik) is
formed to help the Head of Department perform this
continuous assessment.
• Collecting and tabulating data from
•
•
•
•
•
Course Portfolio
Academic Transcript of Graduates
Examiner’s report
Lab. Assistant’s report
etc
• that contribute to PLO achievement.
Workshop Nasional Strategi Meraih Akreditasi Internasional, 18 - 19 April 2017
27
Kerja Mandiri/Kelompok
• Latihan membuat LO dan keterkaitannya dengan
SSC
• Latihan membuat rencana asesmen dari LO
• Sumber asesmen
• Metoda asesmen
• Rubrik asesmen
Workshop Nasional Strategi Meraih Akreditasi Internasional, 18 - 19 April 2017
29
Capaian Pembelajaran
S1 Fisika
Alexander A. Iskandar
Workshop Nasional Strategi Meraih Akreditasi Internasional
Institut Teknologi Bandung, 18-19 April 2017
PEO – PLO – PC – Assessments
Traits of Graduates
(Educational Objectives)
Mastery
(Learning Outcome)
Competence
(Performance
Criteria)
Competence
(Performance
Criteria)
Mastery
(Learning
Outcome)
Assessments
Competence
(Performance
Criteria)
Workshop Nasional Strategi Meraih Akreditasi Internasional, 18 - 19 April 2017
2
PEO
Undergraduate Program in Physics
• Program Educational Objectives (PEO) are
content-related specification of the quality of a
degree programme.
• The Undergraduate Programme in Physics, ITB,
focuses its objectives to produce graduates that
are capable to become professionals, such as
researchers, lecturers, teachers, industrial experts
as well as entrepreneurs.
Workshop Nasional Strategi Meraih Akreditasi Internasional, 18 - 19 April 2017
3
PEO
Undergraduate Program in Physics
PEO of UPP
1 Mastering knowledge and methodology of physics, and having a
problem solving capability in their work.
2 Having a capability to continuously develop knowledge for further
study, either formally or informally.
3 Mastering scientific methods for observing, analysing, and
understanding of physical phenomena, in addition to mastering
induction as well as deduction methods and their applications to
support their career.
4 Keeping with development on their physics fields of interest and their
interactions with science and technology, industry and life in general.
5 Having a capability to communicate ideas orally and in writing, either
scientifically or popularly, to take appropriate initiatives, and to lead a
4
Workshop
Strategi Meraih
Akreditasi Internasional, 18 - 19 April 2017
working group
inNasional
relevant
fields.
Program Learning Outcomes of
Undergraduate Program in Physics
PLO of UPP
1 They are able to demonstrate their knowledge of classical and
modern physics by identifying physical properties of a physical system.
2 They are able to formulate a standard physical system into a physical
model by using mathematics.
3 They are able to solve problems of a standard physical system
comprehensively by the use of mathematics and computational
tools.
4 They are able to analyse a physical system by applying mathematics
and computational tools/ICT.
5 They are able to design and conduct experiments in physics or
related physics areas, and to acquire, analyse and interpret the resulting
Workshop Nasional Strategi Meraih Akreditasi Internasional, 18 - 19 April 2017
data.
7
Program Learning Outcomes
of UPP
PLO of UPP
6 They have a basic capability in oral communication and in writing
scientific report in an appropriate scientific style.
7 They are able to work effectively, both individually and in group.
8 They are able to apply knowledge of physics to broader
areas/interdisciplinary problems.
9 They have basic characters of a good scientist.
10 They have an ability to improve their knowledge and be able to
continue their study in a higher degree program.
Workshop Nasional Strategi Meraih Akreditasi Internasional, 18 - 19 April 2017
8
Correspondence of
PLO and PEO
Objective 1 Objective 2 Objective 3 Objective 4 Objective 5
Outcome 1
S
S
S
S
S
Outcome 2
S
S
S
S
S
Outcome 3
S
S
S
S
S
Outcome 4
S
S
S
S
S
Outcome 5
S
M
S
M
S
Outcome 6
S
M
S
S
M
Outcome 7
S
S
S
M
S
Outcome 8
S
M
S
M
S
Outcome 9
S
M
S
M
S
Outcome 10
M
M
M
M
S
Workshop Nasional Strategi Meraih Akreditasi Internasional, 18 - 19 April 2017
9
Mapping Between
Courses and PLO
No
Code
Course
Name
1 MA1101 Mathematics
IA
2 FI1101
Elementary
Physics IA
3 KI1101 Basic
Chemistry IA
CU PLO PLO PLO PLO PLO PLO PLO PLO PLO PLO
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
4
X
4 (1)
X
X
X
X
X
3
Workshop Nasional Strategi Meraih Akreditasi Internasional, 18 - 19 April 2017
X
8
Alignment between
PLO and SSC
PLO
SSC
Workshop Nasional Strategi Meraih Akreditasi Internasional, 18 - 19 April 2017
11
Subject Specific Criteria
• PLO should be inline with the Subject Specific
Criteria (SSC) of ASIIN.
• The SSC set by ASIIN are the result of an
assessment, regularly performed by ASIIN
Technical Committees, which summarize what is
considered as good practice by a professional
community formed equally by academics and
professional practitioners in higher education
and is required as future-oriented quality of
training in the labour market.
Workshop Nasional Strategi Meraih Akreditasi Internasional, 18 - 19 April 2017
12
SSC for Physics
• With their knowledge and skills graduates of
Bachelor’s degree programmes in physics have a
qualification based on sound fundamentals of
natural sciences and mathematics, certain key
qualifications, and a high degree of flexibility
which, in particular, provides an excellent basis
for further qualification and specialisation.
• They are principally qualified to complete
corresponding Master’s degree programmes.
Workshop Nasional Strategi Meraih Akreditasi Internasional, 18 - 19 April 2017
13
Alignment between
SSC ASIIN – PLO UPP
ASIIN Subject Specific Criteria for
Physics (ASIIN -SSC)
Program Learning Outcomes
(PLO) of UPP
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
They have sound knowledge of classical physics
(mechanics, electrodynamics, thermo-dynamics,
1 vibrations, waves and optics) and are familiar with the
x
fundamentals of quantum, atomic and molecular, nuclear,
elementary particle and solid state physics.
They are familiar with important mathematical
2 methods used in physics and can use these to solve
x
physics problems.
They have an extensive understanding of the
fundamental principles of physics, their inherent
relation and mathematical formulation and, based
3 on this, have acquired methods suitable for
x
theoretical analysis, modelling and simulation of
Workshop Nasional Strategi Meraih Akreditasi Internasional, 18 - 19 April 2017
relevant processes.
14
Alignment between
SSC ASIIN – PLO UPP
ASIIN Subject Specific Criteria for Physics (ASIIN -SSC)
Program Learning Outcomes
(PLO) of UPP
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
They have applied their knowledge to physics problems
in an exemplary manner and studied some areas in
4
x
greater depth, thereby acquiring a first basis for
problem solving competence.
They have a basic capacity to comprehend physics
x
5 problems. This will in general however not yet facilitate
a deeper understanding of current research areas.
They are therefore in a position to independently
classify physics-based and to some extent also
interdisciplinary problems that require a target6 oriented and logic-based approach, and to analyse
and/or solve them by using natural scientific and
Workshop Nasional Strategi Meraih Akreditasi Internasional, 18 - 19 April 2017
mathematical methods.
x
15
Alignment between
SSC ASIIN – PLO UPP
ASIIN Subject Specific Criteria for Physics (ASIIN -SSC)
Program Learning Outcomes
(PLO) of UPP
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
They are familiar with basic principles of
experimentation, are able to use modern physics
7
measurement methods, and are in a position to assess
the significance of results correctly.
They have generally also acquired an overview
8 knowledge in selected other natural science subjects
or technical disciplines.
They are able to apply their knowledge to different
fields and act responsibly in their professional activity.
They are moreover able to recognize new trends in
9
their subject area and integrate the relevant
methodology – possibly after appropriate qualification
Workshop Nasional Strategi Meraih Akreditasi Internasional, 18 - 19 April 2017
– into their further work.
x
x
x
16
Alignment between
SSC ASIIN – PLO UPP
Program Learning Outcomes
ASIIN Subject Specific Criteria for Physics (ASIIN -SSC)
(PLO) of UPP
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
They are able to continuously and self-reliantly extend
and deepen the knowledge acquired in the Bachelor's
degree program. They are familiar with suitable learning
10
strategies (lifelong learning) for this; they are in
particular capable of a consecutive Master's degree
program in principle.
They have gained initial experience with regard to
generic qualifications (e.g. time management, study
and work techniques, willingness to cooperate, capacity
11
for teamwork, ability to communicate, rules of good
scientific practice) in their degree program, and are able
to develop these skills further.
They have learnt communication techniques and are
12 familiar with the basic elements of the relevant
Workshop Nasional Strategi Meraih Akreditasi Internasional, 18 - 19 April 2017
specialized English.
x
x
x
x
17
Alignment between
SSC ASIIN – PLO UPP
ASIIN Subject Specific Criteria for Physics
(ASIIN -SSC)
Program Learning Outcomes
(PLO) of UPP
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
They are able to solve a simple scientific problem and to
13 present their results orally (lecture) and in writing
(demonstrated in a Bachelor’s thesis).
Workshop Nasional Strategi Meraih Akreditasi Internasional, 18 - 19 April 2017
x
18
PLO and its
Performance Criteria (PC)
• Performance Criteria (PC) of each PLO are a list
of competences that indicate the successful
achievement of the corresponding PLO.
• Assessment of these achievements is done
regularly with an evaluation rubric.
Workshop Nasional Strategi Meraih Akreditasi Internasional, 18 - 19 April 2017
19
PLO – PC Assessment
Workshop Nasional Strategi Meraih Akreditasi Internasional, 18 - 19 April 2017
20
18
PLO – PC Assessment Sources
PLO
PLO Descriptions
Assessment Sources
1
They are able to demonstrate their knowledge of
classical and modern physics by identifying physical
properties of a physical system.
2
They are able to formulate a standard physical
student’s exam
system into a physical model by using mathematics.
student’s exam
They are able to solve problems of a standard
physical system comprehensively by the use of
mathematics and computational tools.
They are able to analyse a physical system by
student’s exam
applying mathematics and computational tools/ICT.
They are able to design and conduct experiments in
student’s laboratory reports,
physics or related physics areas, and to acquire,
laboratory assistance’s notes
analyse and interpret the resulting data
They have a basic capability in oral communication
student’s laboratory reports,
and in writing scientific report in an appropriate
laboratory assistance’s notes,
Workshop Nasional Strategi Meraih Akreditasi Internasional, 18 - 19 April 2017
scientific style
Final Project report 21 19
3
4
5
6
student’s exam
PLO – PC Assessment Sources
PLO
PLO Descriptions
7
They are able to work effectively, both
individually
and in a group
8
They are able to apply knowledge of physics to
broader areas / interdisciplinary problems
9
They have basic characters of a good scientist
10
Assessment Sources
questionnaire and lecturer’s
notes of Independent Study course,
Final Project, courses with RBL,
courses with lab. works
the number of Elective Courses
from other study programmes and
interdiciplinary elective courses within
the study programme listed in graduate’s
transcript
questionnaire, lecturer’s notes of
Independent Study course,
Final Project, courses with RBL,
courses with lab. works
graduate’s transcript
They have an ability to improve their
knowledgeWorkshop
and beNasional
able to
continue their study
Strategi Meraih Akreditasi Internasional, 18 - 19 April 2017
in higher degree programme
20
Assessment Rubric
• Learning Outcome 1:
They are able to demonstrate their knowledge of classical
and modern physics by identifying physical properties of a
physical system
No
1
PC
Rating 4
Rating 3
Rating 2
Based on
Based on
midterm exam
midterm exam
and/or final exam, and/or final exam,
students showed students could
their ability to
identify/explain
identify/explain
only part of the
concepts and
concepts and
physical quantities physical quantities
in a physical
in a physical
system correctly.
system correctly
but less
completely.
Workshop Nasional Strategi Meraih Akreditasi Internasional, 18 - 19 April 2017
Demonstrate
knowledge of
classical and
modern physics
by identify a
physical system
Based on
midterm exam
and/or final exam,
students showed
their ability to
identify/explain
concepts and
physical quantities
in a physical
system correctly
and completely.
Rating 1
Based on midterm
exam and/or final
exam, students
could not able to
identify/explain
correctly the
concepts and
physical quantities
in a physical
system.
23
Assessment Rubric
• Learning Outcome 5:
They are able to design and conduct experiments
in physics or related physics areas, and to acquire,
analyze and interpret the resulting data
No
1
PC
Demonstrate
ability to plan
and prepare
practical
laboratory
investigation
Rating 4
In their reports
students wrote
experiment
plan correctly
and completely
Rating 3
In their reports
students wrote
experiment
plan correctly
but
incompletely
Rating 2
In their reports
students wrote
experiment
plan but
partially are
incorrect.
Workshop Nasional Strategi Meraih Akreditasi Internasional, 18 - 19 April 2017
Rating 1
In their reports
students
incorrectly
wrote
experiment
plan.
24
Assessment Rubric
No
2
PC
Demonstrate ability
to conduct
experiment and to
record data using a
variety of suitable
instrument in a
responsible and in
compliant way to the
relevant health and
safety regulations.
Rating 4
Laboratory
assistants
reported that
students carried
out the
experiment
correctly and
completely.
Laboratory
assistants
reported that
students carried
out their
experiment by
taking related
safety procedures
into consideration.
Rating 3
Laboratory
assistants
reported that
students carried
out the
experiment
correctly but less
completely.
Laboratory
assistants
reported that
students carried
out their
experiment by
taking most of all
related safety
procedures into
consideration.
Rating 2
Laboratory
assistants
reported that
students carried
out the
experiment
correctly but
incompletely.
Laboratory
assistants
reported that
students carried
out their
experiment by
taking, but only
partially, related
safety procedures
into consideration.
Workshop Nasional Strategi Meraih Akreditasi Internasional, 18 - 19 April 2017
Alexander A. Iskandar
Rating 1
Laboratory
assistants
reported that
students carried
out the
experiment
incorrectly.
Laboratory
assistants
reported that
students carried
out their
experiment
without
considering safety
procedures.
23
Assessment Rubric
No
2
PC
Demonstrate ability
to conduct
experiment and to
record data using a
variety of suitable
instrument in a
responsible and in
compliant way to the
relevant health and
safety regulations.
Rating 4
In their reports
students wrote
experiment
data in tables
and graphs.
The tables and
graphs are
numbered and
explained.
Rating 3
In their
reports
students wrote
experiment
data in tables
and graphs.
The tables and
graphs are
explained.
Rating 2
In their
reports
students wrote
experiment
data in tables
and graphs.
The tables and
graphs are
partially
explained.
Workshop Nasional Strategi Meraih Akreditasi Internasional, 18 - 19 April 2017
Rating 1
In their
reports
students wrote
experiment
data in tables
and graphs.
No
explanation on
the tables and
graphs.
24
Assessment Rubric
No
3
PC
Demonstrate
ability to
analyze and
interpret
resulting data
using
knowledge of
mathematics
and physics
Rating 4
In their
experimental
report students
discussed the
relationship
between
physical
variables and
analyzed their
trends.
Rating 3
In their
experimental
report students
incompletely
discussed the
relationship
between
physical
variables and
analyzed their
trends.
Rating 2
In their
experimental
report students
discussed the
relationship
between
physical
variables
without
analyzing their
trends.
Workshop Nasional Strategi Meraih Akreditasi Internasional, 18 - 19 April 2017
Rating 1
In their
experimental
report students
didn’t discuss
the relationship
between
physical
variables.
26
Assessment Plan
• Assessment is scheduled periodically (end of
semester or end of academic year).
• A task force (GKM Prodi and Asisten Akademik) is
formed to help the Head of Department perform this
continuous assessment.
• Collecting and tabulating data from
•
•
•
•
•
Course Portfolio
Academic Transcript of Graduates
Examiner’s report
Lab. Assistant’s report
etc
• that contribute to PLO achievement.
Workshop Nasional Strategi Meraih Akreditasi Internasional, 18 - 19 April 2017
27
Kerja Mandiri/Kelompok
• Latihan membuat LO dan keterkaitannya dengan
SSC
• Latihan membuat rencana asesmen dari LO
• Sumber asesmen
• Metoda asesmen
• Rubrik asesmen
Workshop Nasional Strategi Meraih Akreditasi Internasional, 18 - 19 April 2017
29