Korelasi panjang dan lebar lengkung gigi terhadap posisi anteroposterior bibir pada maloklusi klas I non ekstraksi
DAFTAR PUSTAKA
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
Arcis CB, Montiel JM, Silla JMA. Orthodontic treatment need : an
epidemiological approach. 9 Maret 2012. http://cdn.intechopen.com/pdfswm/31371.pdf. (September 28.2015).
Bishara SE, et.al. Comparison of the dental arch change in patients with Class
II, division 1 malocclusion: extraction vs nonextraction treatment. The Angle
Orthodontist 1994;64(5):351-358
Silva ITP. Angle Class I malocclusion treated with extraction of first permanent
molars. Dental Press J Orthod. 2010;15(4):133-143.
Hassan R, Rahimah AK. Occlusion, malocclusion, and method of
measurements – an overview. Archives of Orofacial Sciences. 2007;2:3-9.
Paramesthi GAMDH, Farmasyanti CA, Karunia D. Besar Indeks Pont dan
Korkhaus Serta Hubungan Antara Lebar dan Panjang Lengkung Gigi Terhadap
Tinggi Palatum pada Suku Jawa. Maj Ked Gi 2011; 18(1):6-10.
Moyers RE. Handbook of Ortodontics. 4th eds., London: Year Book Medical
Publisher, INC 1998:121-4,186,233.
Paramesthi GAMDH, Farmasyanti CA, Karunia D. 10Hubungan antara Lebar
dan Panjang Lengkung Gigi terhadap Tinggi Palatum pada Suku Jawa dengan
Metode Pont dan Korkhaus. Maj Ked Gi 2011; 18(1):6-10.
Kim E, Gianelly AA. Extraction vs non extraction : arch widths and smile
esthetics. Angle Orthodontist. 2003;73(4):354-358.
Erliera, Anggani HS. Hal-hal yang harus dipertimbangkan dalam menentukan
indikasi ekstraksi atau non-ekstraksi pada perawatan ortodonti. Dentika Dent J
2006;11(2):198-202
Singh G.ed. Textbook of orthodontics. 2nd ed. New Delhi: Jaypee Brothers
Medical Publisher (P) LTD, 2007: 94-116, 163-174, 230-1, 246-7.
Marya CM. Epidemiology and Etiology of Malocclusion. A Textbook of Public
Health Dentistry. 2011;
Foster TD. Buku Ajar Ortodonsi. 3th ed. Jakarta: ECG, 1993:30-8,174179,192-209
Bhalajhi SI. Classification of Malocclusion. Orthodontics the art and science.
2004: 63-70.
Bhalajhi SI. Ortodontics The Art and Science. 3 th ed., New Delhi: ARYA
(MEDI) Publishing House,2003:63-74,177-178,239-46,259-60.
Frindel C. Practical Orthodontic Rubric: Clear Thinking about Interproximal
Stripping. JDAO 2010; 13:187-8.
50
Universitas Sumatera Utara
16.
17.
18.
19.
Ram KJ. Evaluation of Crowding in relation to tooth size, arch size, and arch
form in North-east Indian population. J Pharm Biomed Sci 2013;31(31):1199200.
Poosti M, Jalali T. Tooth size and arch dimension in uncrowded versus
crowded class I malocclusion. Journal of contemporary dental practice 2007;
8(3):3.
Mahmood AD. A Comparative Study of Tooth Size and Dental Arch
Dimension between Iraqi Arabs and Kurds with Class I Normal Occlusion. AlRafidan Dent J 2012; 12(1):71-9.
Rieuwpassa IE, Toppo S, Haerawati SD. Perbedaan ukuran dan bentuk
lengkung gigi antara laki-laki dan perempuan suku Bugis, Makasar, dan Toraja.
Dentofasial 2012;11(3): 156-60.
20.
Kareem FA, Rasheed TA, Rauf AM. Longitudinal changes indental arch
circumference in Sulaimani city. J Eur Scientific 2013;9(18):109-19.
21.
Alpiah DRA, Anindita PS, Juliatri. Ukuran dan bentuk lengkung gigi rahang
bawah pada suku minahasa. J eG 2015; 3(2): 373-8.
22.
Al-Zubair NM. Dental arch asymmetry. Eur J Dent 2014;8(2):224-8
23.
Rakosi T. Cephalometric Radiography. Wolf Medically; 1982:55-95.
24.
Jacobson A. Radiographic Cephalometry From Basic to Video Imaging.
Quintessence Publishing 1995:95-97.
25.
Isiekwe GI, daCosta OO, Isiekwe MC. A cephalometric investigation of
horizontal lip position in adult Nigerians. 2012:39:160-169.
26.
Begum M, Goje SK, Karra A, Mohan S. Tooth size and arch parameter
discrepancies among different malocclusions in young permanent dentition of
13-15 year old school children of Nalgonda District-South Indian population.
Jorthodr 2014;2(1):4-10.
27.
Terrez YC, Fitzmaurice OS. Tejada HEP. Pont’s index in study models of
patients who finished a non-extraction orthodontic treatment at the Orthodontic
Clinic of the Postgraduate Studies and Research Division of the National
University of Mexico. Revista Mexicana de Ortodonsia 2013;1(1):7-12.
28.
Asad S et al. Assesment of Antero-Posterior Position of Lips : E-Line – S-Line.
Pakistan Oral & Dental Journal 2011:31(1):84-87.
50
Universitas Sumatera Utara
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
Arcis CB, Montiel JM, Silla JMA. Orthodontic treatment need : an
epidemiological approach. 9 Maret 2012. http://cdn.intechopen.com/pdfswm/31371.pdf. (September 28.2015).
Bishara SE, et.al. Comparison of the dental arch change in patients with Class
II, division 1 malocclusion: extraction vs nonextraction treatment. The Angle
Orthodontist 1994;64(5):351-358
Silva ITP. Angle Class I malocclusion treated with extraction of first permanent
molars. Dental Press J Orthod. 2010;15(4):133-143.
Hassan R, Rahimah AK. Occlusion, malocclusion, and method of
measurements – an overview. Archives of Orofacial Sciences. 2007;2:3-9.
Paramesthi GAMDH, Farmasyanti CA, Karunia D. Besar Indeks Pont dan
Korkhaus Serta Hubungan Antara Lebar dan Panjang Lengkung Gigi Terhadap
Tinggi Palatum pada Suku Jawa. Maj Ked Gi 2011; 18(1):6-10.
Moyers RE. Handbook of Ortodontics. 4th eds., London: Year Book Medical
Publisher, INC 1998:121-4,186,233.
Paramesthi GAMDH, Farmasyanti CA, Karunia D. 10Hubungan antara Lebar
dan Panjang Lengkung Gigi terhadap Tinggi Palatum pada Suku Jawa dengan
Metode Pont dan Korkhaus. Maj Ked Gi 2011; 18(1):6-10.
Kim E, Gianelly AA. Extraction vs non extraction : arch widths and smile
esthetics. Angle Orthodontist. 2003;73(4):354-358.
Erliera, Anggani HS. Hal-hal yang harus dipertimbangkan dalam menentukan
indikasi ekstraksi atau non-ekstraksi pada perawatan ortodonti. Dentika Dent J
2006;11(2):198-202
Singh G.ed. Textbook of orthodontics. 2nd ed. New Delhi: Jaypee Brothers
Medical Publisher (P) LTD, 2007: 94-116, 163-174, 230-1, 246-7.
Marya CM. Epidemiology and Etiology of Malocclusion. A Textbook of Public
Health Dentistry. 2011;
Foster TD. Buku Ajar Ortodonsi. 3th ed. Jakarta: ECG, 1993:30-8,174179,192-209
Bhalajhi SI. Classification of Malocclusion. Orthodontics the art and science.
2004: 63-70.
Bhalajhi SI. Ortodontics The Art and Science. 3 th ed., New Delhi: ARYA
(MEDI) Publishing House,2003:63-74,177-178,239-46,259-60.
Frindel C. Practical Orthodontic Rubric: Clear Thinking about Interproximal
Stripping. JDAO 2010; 13:187-8.
50
Universitas Sumatera Utara
16.
17.
18.
19.
Ram KJ. Evaluation of Crowding in relation to tooth size, arch size, and arch
form in North-east Indian population. J Pharm Biomed Sci 2013;31(31):1199200.
Poosti M, Jalali T. Tooth size and arch dimension in uncrowded versus
crowded class I malocclusion. Journal of contemporary dental practice 2007;
8(3):3.
Mahmood AD. A Comparative Study of Tooth Size and Dental Arch
Dimension between Iraqi Arabs and Kurds with Class I Normal Occlusion. AlRafidan Dent J 2012; 12(1):71-9.
Rieuwpassa IE, Toppo S, Haerawati SD. Perbedaan ukuran dan bentuk
lengkung gigi antara laki-laki dan perempuan suku Bugis, Makasar, dan Toraja.
Dentofasial 2012;11(3): 156-60.
20.
Kareem FA, Rasheed TA, Rauf AM. Longitudinal changes indental arch
circumference in Sulaimani city. J Eur Scientific 2013;9(18):109-19.
21.
Alpiah DRA, Anindita PS, Juliatri. Ukuran dan bentuk lengkung gigi rahang
bawah pada suku minahasa. J eG 2015; 3(2): 373-8.
22.
Al-Zubair NM. Dental arch asymmetry. Eur J Dent 2014;8(2):224-8
23.
Rakosi T. Cephalometric Radiography. Wolf Medically; 1982:55-95.
24.
Jacobson A. Radiographic Cephalometry From Basic to Video Imaging.
Quintessence Publishing 1995:95-97.
25.
Isiekwe GI, daCosta OO, Isiekwe MC. A cephalometric investigation of
horizontal lip position in adult Nigerians. 2012:39:160-169.
26.
Begum M, Goje SK, Karra A, Mohan S. Tooth size and arch parameter
discrepancies among different malocclusions in young permanent dentition of
13-15 year old school children of Nalgonda District-South Indian population.
Jorthodr 2014;2(1):4-10.
27.
Terrez YC, Fitzmaurice OS. Tejada HEP. Pont’s index in study models of
patients who finished a non-extraction orthodontic treatment at the Orthodontic
Clinic of the Postgraduate Studies and Research Division of the National
University of Mexico. Revista Mexicana de Ortodonsia 2013;1(1):7-12.
28.
Asad S et al. Assesment of Antero-Posterior Position of Lips : E-Line – S-Line.
Pakistan Oral & Dental Journal 2011:31(1):84-87.
50
Universitas Sumatera Utara