THE ENGLISH TEACHERS’ UNDERSTANDING OF GENRE BASED APPROACH: APPLICATION AND DIFFICULTIES IN TEACHING-LEARNING ACTIVITIES.

(1)

TABLE OF CONTENT

APPROVAL SHEET... i

DECLARATION... ii

PREFACE... iii

AKNOWLEDGEMENTS... iv

ABSTRACT... v

TABLE OF CONTENT... vi

LIST OF TABLES AND FIGURES... ix

LIST OF APPENDICES... x

CHAPTER I: INTRODUCTION... 1

1.1 Background of the Study... 1

1.2 Research Questions... 3

1.3 Purpose of the Study... 3

1.4 The Significant of the Study... 4

1.5 Thesis Organization... 4

CHAPTER II: THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK... 6

2.1 Definition of Genre... 6

2.2 Genre-Based Approach... 9

2.3 Basic Principles of Genre-Based Approach... 10

2.4 The Curriculum Cycle Model... 14

2.4.1 Building Knowledge of the Field (BKOF)... 17

2.4.2 Modelling of Text (MOT)... 19

2.4.3 Joint Construction of Text (JCOT)... 21

2.4.4 Independent Construction of Text (ICOT)... 23

2.5 Text Types... 24

2.5.1 Descriptive... 25

2.5.2 Procedure... 26

2.5.3 Recount... 29

2.5.4 Narrative... 32

2.5.5 Report... 36

2.6 Systemic Functional Grammar... 38

2.7 Concluding Remark... 40

CHAPTER III: RESEARCH METHODOLOGY... 42

3.1 Research Problems... 42

3.2 Research Design... 42

3.3 Data Collection... 43

3.3.1 Research Site... 43

3.3.2 Participants... 43

3.3.3 Research Instrument... 45

3.3.3.1 Questionnaires... 45

3.3.3.2 Classroom Observations... 47

3.3.3.3 Interviews... 49

3.3.4 Teaching Material... 50

3.4 Data Analysis... 51

3.5 Concluding Remark... 54


(2)

4.1 Data from Questionnaires... 55

4.1.1 The English Teachers’ Understanding of Genre-Based Approach... 55

4.1.1.1 Curriculum Cycle of Genre-Based Approach... 56

4.1.1.2 Basic Principle of Genre-Based Approach... 57

4.1.1.3 Text Types... 58

4.1.1.4 Systemic Functional Grammar... 63

4.1.2 The Implementation of Genre-Based Approach in Teaching-Learning Activities Based on the English Teachers’ Understanding... 63

4.1.3 The Difficulty that the English Teachers Encounter In Implementing Genre-Based Approach... 64

4.2 Data from Classroom Observations... 65

4.2.1 Teacher One... 65

4.2.1.1 The English Teachers’ Understanding of Genre-Based Approach... 66

4.2.1.2 The Implementation of Genre-Based Approach in Teaching-Learning Activities Based on the English Teachers’ Understanding... 68

4.2.1.3 The Difficulty that the English Teachers Encounter in Implementing Genre-Based Approach... 74

4.2.2 Teacher Two... 74

4.2.2.1 The English Teachers’ Understanding of Genre-Based Approach... 75

4.2.2.2 The Implementation of Genre-Based Approach in Teaching-Learning Activities Based on the English Teachers’ Understanding... 75

4.2.2.3 The Difficulty that the English Teachers Encounter in Implementing Genre-Based Approach... 83

4.3 Data from Interviews... 84

4.3.1 Interview (Teacher One)... 85

4.3.1.1 The English Teachers’ Understanding of Genre-Based Approach... 85

4.3.1.2 The Implementation of Genre-Based Approach in Teaching-Learning Activities Based on the English Teachers’ Understanding... 89

4.3.1.3 The Difficulty that the English Teachers Encounter in Implementing Genre-Based Approach... 90

4.3.2 Interview (Teacher Two)... 91

4.3.2.1 The English Teachers’ Understanding of Genre-Based Approach... 91

4.3.2.2 The Implementation of Genre-Based Approach in Teaching-Learning Activities Based on the English Teachers’ Understanding... 95

4.3.2.3 The Difficulty that the English Teachers Encounter in Implementing Genre-Based Approach... 96

4.4 Synthesis of Findings... 96

4.5 Concluding Remark... 98

CHAPTER V: CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS... 100


(3)

5.2 Limitation of Study... 101

5.3 Recommendations... 102

BIBLIOGRAPHY... 104


(4)

CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION

This chapter discusses five main issues including the background of the study, the research questions, the purpose of the study, the significant of the study, and the thesis organization.

1.1.Background of the Study

Curriculum is a set of programs and regulations about purpose, content, teaching materials and teaching methods as the guidance in implementing teaching and learning activities to achieve certain education purposes, (BSNP, 2003). Indonesia has applied a school-based curriculum (KTSP) since 2006.

A school-based curriculum is a curriculum that operates based on the implementation of education units to achieve educational purposes. It means that every school has to arrange its own curriculum based on the potential, the characteristics, the condition of its institution, the students and the location (BSNP, 2006).

Based on the curriculum, the English teaching for junior and senior high school is to do with different genres that students should master (BSNP, 2006; see also Derewianka, 1990). Thus, a genre-based approach is considered relevant to teach the genres. The genre based approach is implemented not only in Indonesia but also in some countries such as Singapore, South Africa, USA, Italy, Hong Kong, Australia, UK, China, Canada, Sweden, and Thailand (Derewianka, 2003).


(5)

The genre-based approach consists of four stages, namely Building Knowledge of Field, Modelling of text, Joint Construction of text, and Independent Construction of Text. The stages are implemented in a cyclical pattern. Thus, the combination of the stages is called “Curriculum Cycle” (Derewianka, 1990).

The genre-based approach is becoming increasingly influential in the field of English language teaching (Derewianka, 2003). Therefore, many studies have been carried out to explore the different aspects of the approach. Many studies of the genre-based approach, for instance conducted by Derwianka (2003), Hyland (2007), Lin (2006), Paltridge (1996), Badger and White (2000), and Cheng (2008), have been conducted to investigate the effectiveness of the approach in teaching learning activities such as in teaching speaking, reading and mostly in writing. In this case, the studies mostly focus on the students as the subjects of the research.

However, to investigate the effectiveness of the genre-based approach in teaching-learning processes, the studies should focus not only on the students but also on the English teachers. As far as the research is concerned only the implementation of genre based approach in teaching-learning processes, such as the studies conducted by Efendy (2007), Suzanna (2008), Helmi (2008), Safiudin (2008), Yosefa (2009), and Kartiwi (2008). The research on the genre-based approach on teachers’ understanding is still rare, for instance the study of Kay and Evans (1998). Thus, the study focusing on the English teachers’ understanding of genre-based approach is significant. The teachers are the key factor in implementing curriculum successfully, so the role of teachers in education is crucial (Vygotsky, cited in Dolya, 2007; Richards, 2002: 99).


(6)

The results of this study are expected to contribute to the development of the genre-based approach and provide information for teachers in implementing the genre-based approach in the classrooms.

1.2.Research Questions

In line with the background above, this research attempts to address the following questions:

1. What do the English teachers understand of Genre-Based Approach?

2. Is the English teachers’ understanding of Genre-Based Approach reflected in their teaching-learning activities?

3. What difficulties do the English teachers encounter in implementing Genre-Based Approach?

1.3. Purpose of Study

Based on the focus mentioned above, the purposes of this study are:

1. To explore the English teachers’ understanding of Genre-Based Approach particularly with regard to the basic principles of Genre-Based Approach, the curriculum cycle of the genre-based approach, the text types, and systemic functional grammar.

2. To investigate the implementation of Genre-Based Approach in teaching-learning activities based on the English teachers’ understanding.

3. To examine the problems that the English teachers encounter in applying Genre-Based Approach.


(7)

1.4. Significance of the Study

This study is significant for several reasons. Theoretically, the significance of this study is to collect and to document data that are considered will be useful for further improvement and for further study dealing with the primary issue. Principally, the significance of this study is to investigate the English teachers’ understanding concerning the genre-based approach to enhance the quality of teaching-learning processes. Moreover, this study is expected to contribute to the development of the based approach and provide information for teachers in applying the genre-based approach in the classrooms.

1.5. Thesis Organization

This thesis consists of five chapters. Chapter One is an introduction. This chapter elaborates the background of the study, research questions, purpose of the study, the significant of the study, and thesis organization.

Chapter Two is theoretical framework. This chapter presents relevant theories that underpinned this study. The theories deal with theory of genre-based approach (GBA) including the basic principles and the curriculum cycle of genre- based approach; the text types; and systemic functional grammar (SFG).

Chapter Three is research methodology. This chapter describes the research methodology of this study that covers research problems; research design; data collection including research site, participants and research instrument; teaching material and data analysis.

Chapter Four is data presentation and analysis. This chapter presents and analyzes data obtained in the study.


(8)

Chapter Five is conclusions and recommendation. This chapter highlights the conclusions of the finding of this study and presents some suggestions for further study and teachers’ professional development.


(9)

CHAPTER III

RESEARCH METHODOLOGY

This chapter focuses on the process of conducting the research. These include research problems, research design, data collection, and data analysis. 3.1.Research Problems

This chapter discusses the research methodology to investigate the answers of all research questions. The research questions consisted of 1) What do the English teachers understand of genre-based approach?; 2) Is the English teachers’ understanding of genre-based approach reflected in their teaching-learning activities?; 3) What difficulties do the English teachers encounter in implementing genre-based approach?.

3.2.Research Design

This study employed a mixed method design. It was a triangulation design. Creswell (2007: 62-63) and Dornyei (2007) state that the triangulation design is used to directly compare and contrast quantitative statistical results with qualitative findings. Relevant to the statement, this study applied the triangulation design because it compared and contrasted the data gained from questionnaires, classroom observations, and interviews to enhance the validity for this study.

Regarding the quantitative data, this study collected and analyzed the data obtained from the questionnaires. Dornyei (2007: 102) and Creswell (2008: 54) argue that the quantitative are gathered to measure and find out what participants think about the variable. The statement is relevant to this study. In this research, the questionnaires were employed to measure the English teachers’ understanding of genre-based approach, find out the implementation of the genre-based approach


(10)

based on their understanding of the approach, and investigate the difficulty they encountered in implementing the approach.

Concerning the qualitative data, this research collected and analyzed data gained from classroom observations and semi structure interviews. The qualitative data were collected to get detail opinion from participants. This study is relevant to Dawson’ statement (2010: 15).

3.3. Data Collection

This section discusses the data collecting techniques in conducting this study including research site, participants, and research instruments. Each division is explained below.

3.3.1. Research Site

This study was conducted at Junior High Schools located in a regency in West Java. In the regency there are one hundred and forty nine junior high schools divided into five groups based on the location. The schools were chosen randomly and purposively as the participants of this study.

The other reason was related to technical consideration, namely easy access. It means the researcher felt easy to get data since the junior high schools are located where the researcher lives.

3.3.2. Participants

The participants of this research were thirty English teachers coming from thirty junior high schools. Regarding the sample size, Fraenkel and Wallen (2000) states that sample size affects accuracy of representation. It is minimum is 30; upper


(11)

limit is 1.000. The larger sample means less chance of error. Relevant to the statement, this study involved thirty English teachers as the participants. A limitation to number of the participants was regarding the efficiency of time in analyzing the data obtained. Since there were so many items that had to be to analyzed and it needed time and hard work.

Regarding the data collecting of questionnaires, the thirty English teachers of junior high schools were picked out randomly. Concerning random sampling, Fraenkel and Wallen (2000), Dawson (2010: 55), Ross (2005) and Dornyei (2007: 97; 2003: 73) state that random samplings are employed to gave all participants an equal chance of being selected and minimized the effects of any extraneous or subjective factors. The random samplings of this study are elaborated in the following description.

There are one hundred and forty nine junior high schools in the regency. The junior high schools are divided into five groups based on the location of the schools. Thus, each group consists of twenty-nine or thirty junior high schools.

In conducting random sampling, all schools in the population were numbered one by one based on the groups. Then from each group, six numbers of schools were drawing randomly. Finally, thirty schools coming from five groups were selected randomly as the sample of this study. Thus, each group was represented by six English teachers coming from six junior high schools. Referring to the description above, the random sampling procedure of this study conforms to the theory proposed by the experts (Fraenkel and Wallen, 2000; Dawson, 2010: 55; and Dornyei, 2007: 97; 2003: 73).


(12)

With respect to non-participant classroom observations and semi-structured interviews, the participants were two of thirty English teachers of junior high schools chosen purposively. By considering the result from the questionnaire data, the purposive sampling in this study meant that based on the questionnaire results, two of them who got the best score were chosen to be observed and interviewed. Moreover, they were the English teachers who were ready to be the subjects of this study. Thus, the two English teachers played triple roles in this research.

3.3.3. Research instruments

This study collected data from many sources, namely questionnaires, non-participant classroom observations and semi structure interviews. Each technique is elaborated below.

3.3.3.1. Questionnaires

Brown (2001: 6 cited from Dornyei, 2003: 6) states that questionnaires are any written instruments that present respondents with a series of questions or statements to which they are to react either by writing out their answers or by selecting from among existing answers. Meanwhile Thomas (2003: 66) argues that questionnaire is typically used in a very general sense to mean any printed set of questions that participants in a survey are asked to answer, either by checking one choice from among several possible answers listed beneath a question or by writing out an answer.

Relevant to the statements, this study employed closed-ended and open-ended questionnaires. The closed-open-ended questionnaires were used to investigate


(13)

the answer of the first research question. It was the English teachers’ understanding of genre-based approach including the curriculum cycle and the basic principles of the approach, the text types, and systemic functional grammar. Meanwhile the open-ended questionnaires were employed to explore the answer of the second research question concerning the implementation of genre-based approach in teaching learning activities based on the English teachers’ understanding. It also attempted to investigate the difficulty they encountered in implementing the approach, as the last research question.

As discussed in the previous section, in this study, the questionnaires were posed to thirty English teachers of junior high school in a regency in West Java selected randomly. In closed-ended questionnaire, the participants answered sixty-five questions by choosing one of the answer categories that came closest to or best represented their beliefs, opinions or knowledge of the situation. The categories involved “strongly agree, agree, disagree, or strongly disagree” and listed beside the questions. The statement is relevant to the theory proposed by Dornyei (2003: 37) and Labaw (1980: 131). Besides, some questions in the questionnaires were adopted from the research of Emilia et al (2010).

Meanwhile, in open-ended questionnaires, they answered ten questions. In the section, they had no options to answer the questions. However, they had to fill the blank space (see Dawson, 2010: 31; Dornyei, 2007: 107). It intended to give them very free answer as proposed by Labaw (1980: 131). Besides, to make the English teachers free in expressing their ideas and comprehend the questions more easily, the questionnaires were presented in Indonesian.


(14)

In addition, the data of questionnaires were collected by carrying out one-to-one administration as suggested by Dornyei (2003: 81) and Oppenheim (1992). It was distributed in six weeks, precisely on July up to August 2011.

The results of the questionnaires were elaborated in Chapter Four as the research findings.

3.3.3.2. Classroom Observations

Thomas (2003: 60) argues that gathering information by means of observation involves watching and or listening to events, then recording what occurred.

Regarding this, after obtaining data by distributing questionnaires, the next data were collected by conducting non-participant classroom observations. In this case, the researcher positioned herself not as a teacher. The researcher immediately saw and heard what was happening as recommended by Thomas (2003: 60). It means that the researcher only noted what was going on during the teaching-learning process by applying the genre-based approach. The researcher did not also interact to participate during the teaching-learning process.

As collecting data of the questionnaires, the classroom observations were conducted to investigate all research questions. The first research question was to explore the English teachers’ understanding of genre-based approach concerning the curriculum cycle and the basic principles of genre-based approach, the text types and systemic functional grammar. The second research question was to investigate the implementation of genre-based approach in the classroom setting based on their understanding of the approach. The last research question was to examine the problems they encountered in applying the approach.


(15)

The classroom observations were conducted at two classes of different schools in the regency. The two English teachers observed were the participants who had got the highest scores in the questionnaires. The Teacher One was the English teacher who teaches in a state junior high school (a pilot international standard school) located in the centre of the regency (group one). The Teacher Two was the English teacher who teaches in a state junior high school (minimum service standard school) located in rural area (group five).

The classroom observations of Teacher One were carried out on August up to September 2011. It was held on grade eight for six meetings. The observations were conducted three times a week. Each session of the classroom observation took 80 minutes. Meanwhile the classroom observations of Teacher Two were conducted on September up to October 2011. As the classroom observations of Teacher One, the classroom observations of Teacher Two was conducted for six meetings and each meeting took 80 minutes as well. However, the classroom observations of Teacher Two were carried out twice a week on grade nine.

During conducting the classroom observations, the researcher wrote the activities done by the teacher and the students in the interaction setting in the classroom as suggested by Morrison (1993, cited in Emilia at al, 2008). Besides, the researcher made the observation notes as soon as after each session of the observations finished when the memory of the observations was still fresh as proposed by Van Lier (1988: 241). Moreover, to construct validity for the observations, a colleague of the researcher was invited to record all activities during the processes of the classroom observations. It intended to enable the


(16)

researcher to watch the classroom observations repeatedly when it was necessary (Van Lier, 1988).

All activities in the classroom observations were discussed in detail in Chapter Four of this research.

3.3.3.3. Interviews

Interviews were the last data collecting technique in this research. According to Thomas (2003: 63), interviews usually involve a researcher orally asking questions for individuals to answer orally. Meanwhile, Kvale (1996: 14) states that individual interview is an interchange of views between an interviewer and the interviewee by talking about a theme of mutual interest. Moreover, Dawson (2010: 28) argues that interview aims to know specific information that can be compared and contrasted with the information gained from other data collecting techniques. For the reasons, this study employed semi structures interviews that could support the findings of the data gained from the questionnaires and the classroom observations. In the interviews, the researcher interchanged views concerning the genre-based approach as the main issue in detail with two selected English teachers.

The interviews were conducted to answer all research questions concerning the English teachers’ understanding of the genre-based approach, the application of the approach in teaching-learning activities based on their understanding, and the difficulty they encountered in implementing the approach.

The participants of the interviews were the English teachers who had been observed in the classroom observations. The interviews were done once for one


(17)

English teacher. It was done after all teaching-learning activities in the classroom observations had finished. The interviews were held in the schools where they teach.

In each interview, twenty-five questions by using Indonesia language were posed to each English teacher. Choosing Indonesia language in the interview was to make the English teachers free in expressing their ideas. Moreover, in the interviews, the researcher used a tape recorder to avoid the loss of the data and enable the researcher to transcribe it later. Thus, it enabled the researcher to analyze the data in depth (Silverman, 2005, p: 183-184).

The results of the interviews were presented in the next chapter of this research, Chapter Four.

3.3.4. Teaching Material

Teaching material of this study focused on text types. In this case, it concerned the text types for junior high school only. The text types included Recount, Descriptive, Procedure, Narrative and Report.

In collecting data by using questionnaires, all text types were posed to the participants in depth including the social function, the schematic structure, and the linguistic features, and the example of each text. The data can be seen completely on Appendix One.

Meanwhile in conducting classroom observation, the researcher observed the application of the texts in classroom activities. In the classroom observation of Teacher One, the teaching material focused on Recount text because the teacher


(18)

taught in grade eight. Whereas, in the classroom observation of Teacher Two it discussed Procedure text because the teacher taught in grade nine. The complete data can be seen on Appendix Four.

In obtaining data by using interviews, the English teachers were posed questions related to all text types in detail as done in the questionnaires. It involved the social function, the schematic structure, and the linguistic feature of each text. The data can be seen completely on Appendix Five.

3.4. Data Analyses

The data analyses were conducted to answer all research questions. The data obtained from closed-ended and open-ended questionnaires, non-participant classroom observations, and semi-structured interviews were analyzed, categorized, and then interpreted into three themes based on the research questions.

Because this study employed a mixed method design, the analyses of data were conducted in two phases. The first phase was the analysis of quantitative data and the second one was qualitative data.

Regarding the quantitative data, the closed-ended questionnaires were analyzed to answer the first research question concerning the English teachers’ understanding of the genre-based approach. The data were analyzed in some steps. The step 1 was converting the respondents’ answers to numbers by means of coding procedure. The coding step covered code 1 for strongly disagrees, code 2 for disagrees, code 3 for agrees, and code 4 for strongly agrees. The step 2 was entering the data into a computer file. The step 3 was processing data by using


(19)

frequency analysis and descriptive statistics of SPSS as suggested by Dornyei (2003). The frequency analysis was employed to count how many respondents fit into a particular category (Powell, 2003). The step 4 was calculating the average of each question by using excel program. The step 5 was making ranges to interpret whether the English teachers understand of the genre-based approach or not. The ranges of the percentage proposed by Sudjana (2004, p: 24) involved: the range o% - 25% means “strongly do not understand”; 26% - 50% means “do not understand”; 51% - 75% means “understand”; and 76% - 100% means “strongly understand” of the genre-based approach. The percentages were made to show relationships and comparisons between categories of respondents (Powell, 2003). Besides, the researcher conducted data cleaning to check if there were some mistakes in analyzing the data of questionnaires (Dornyei, 2003: 96-104).

Next, for qualitative data, the data were obtained from the open-ended questionnaires, the classroom observations and the interviews. The data were analyzed by using the theory of qualitative data analyses but in different ways.

The data of the open-ended questionnaires were analyzed by categorizing the answer based on the second and the last research question concerning the implementation of genre based approach in teaching-learning activities based on the English teachers’ understanding and the difficulty they encountered in applying the approach. Then the data were interpreted as the findings. The procedures coincided with the statement of Dornyei (2003).

As discussed in the previous section, the data gained from classroom observations were analyzed to answer all research questions. The data analysis was conducted in the following steps. The step 1 was organizing data of the


(20)

classroom observations into file folders or computer files. The step 2 was transcribing data. It was conducted by listening and watching the videotapes and then reading the notes of the classroom observations. The step 3 was converting data from videotapes into text data. The step 4 was marking the text data by hand and dividing them into three parts based on the themes of the research questions (hand analysis). The themes were the English teachers’ understanding of genre-based approach, the implementation of the approach in teaching-learning activities based on their understanding, and the difficulty they encountered in implementing the approach. The step 5 was describing data. In this step, the researcher described and developed the data consisting of answering the research questions and forming deep understanding of the phenomenon through the description and the thematic development. The step 6 was reporting and interpreting the findings. The steps explained above are relevant to the statement suggested by Creswell (2008: 245-257; see also Powell and Renner, 2003). The interpretation of the findings is presented in detail in the next chapter, Chapter Four.

Meanwhile, the data obtained from the interviews were analyzed in the following steps. The step 1 was converting the data from oral language to written language. The interview transcripts were then read many times and notations were made in the margins to look for the statements representing the perspective mainly related to the research questions. The step 2 was coding the data. The codes were later used as categories to organize the data based on the research questions. The step 3 was interpreting and concluding the data into the findings as a descriptive report representing point of views within interpretative orientation. The stages of the data analysis conformed to the statement proposed by Kvale (1996).


(21)

Finally, all data gained from the questionnaires, the classroom observations and the interviews were triangulated by making comparison and contrast to enhance the validity of the conclusion of this study.

The results of the data analyses were then interpreted in detail in Chapter Four of this research.

3.5. Concluding Remark

This chapter has drawn the methodology of this study that used a mixed method design in particular the triangulation design.

The data were collected by means of the questionnaires, the classroom observations, and the interviews. All data obtained from the sources were analyzed quantitatively and qualitatively. At last, the data were triangulated by making comparison and contrast to enhance the validity of this study. The findings of this study are elaborated in the next chapter, Chapter Four.


(22)

CHAPTER V

CONCLUSION AND SUGGESTION

This chapter discusses three sections namely conclusion, the limitations of study and recommendations for further research. The sections summarize up the information, the research findings, and arguments from the discussion of the previous chapters.

1.1. Conclusion

After discussing the findings from the data gained from the questionnaires, the classroom observations, and the interviews, the researcher derives the following conclusion.

Regarding the first research question concerning the English teachers’ understanding of the genre-based approach including the curriculum cycle, the basic principles of the genre-based approach, text types, and systemic functional grammar, this study found that the English teachers in the regency need more improvement related to the genre-based approach. The findings can be seen completely on Appendix Two and Three for the data gained from the questionnaires, Appendix four for the data obtained from the classroom observations, and Appendix Five for the data derived from the interviews.

In short, the findings indicate the English teachers’ responses for all categories are classified into the range between 25% up to 50% (see Sudjana, 2004). The range means that the English teachers understand the genre-based approach superficially. Besides, the English teachers claim that they have no enough courage to admit that they have good understanding of the approach.


(23)

Thus, they categorize themselves into the categories that have no understanding of the approach.

Related to the second research question concerning the application of the genre-based approach based on the English teachers’ understanding of the approach, it was found that the English teachers seem to understand the genre-based approach but it still needs more improvement and guidance. It can be seen from some unfinished activities in certain stages of the genre-based approach. It means that the English teachers seem confused in applying the approach in particular the activities of each stage of the approach.

With respect to the last research question concerning the difficulty that the English teachers encountered in applying the genre-based approach, it was found that they came across some difficulties. The difficulties involved: the low students’ ability in comprehending and composing texts because they had low capability in vocabulary and grammar; the implementation of the genre-based approach take a long time because the approach consists of stages applied in a cyclical pattern; and limited facilities, in particular for the school located in rural areas.

Referring to the finding above, it can be assumed that the English teachers need more enhancement and guidance related to the main issue. The findings of this study support the findings of Emilia’s research in 2005 and 2008.

5.2. Limitations of the study

In conducting this study, there were some limitations of the study. The first one was limited time in collecting the data particularly the classroom observations. If


(24)

the classroom observation could be conducted in a longer time and in a broaden cycle, the data obtained would be more detail.

The second one, since this study involved two English teachers in the classroom observations and in the interviews, the researcher noticed that the data obtained were limited. If this study involved more participants particularly in the classroom observation and in the interviews, the data gained would be more exhaustive.

5.3 Recommendations for further research

Based on the findings and the limitations of the study, the researcher offers the following recommendations for further research related to the main issue.

The first, as discussed in the previous section, a research particularly in collecting data of classroom observations and interviews with sufficient time and broaden cycle might contribute on more significant findings regarding the primary issue. A further study related to the English teachers’ understanding of genre-based approach in its application in teaching-learning activities in a longer time and more participants might present findings that are more significant on the primary issue.

The second, concerning the English teachers’ understanding of genre-based approach in the regency, it will be better if they are willing to enlarge their knowledge related to the Curriculum cycle of genre-based approach, the basic principles of genre-based approach, the text types, and systemic functional grammar, by attending seminars or workshops. It intends to get understanding of


(25)

the approach in detail. By doing so, their capability in teaching and the students’ ability in learning English can improve.


(26)

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Anderson, M., and Anderson, K. (1997a). Text Types in English 1. Melbourne: Macmillan Education Australia.

Anderson, M., and Anderson, K. (1997b). Text Types in English 2. Melbourne: Macmillan Education Australia.

Badger, R., & George, W. (2000). A Process Genre Approach to Teaching Writing. ELT Journal. Volume 4(2): 153-160. Oxford University Press. Breure, L. (2001). Developing of Genre Concept. Netherlands: Information and

Computing Sciences University of Utrecht. ([email protected]).

BSNP. (2006). Paduan Penyusunan KTSP Jenjang Dasar dan Menengah. Jakarta: Departemen pendidikan Nasional.

BSNP. (2007). Model Silabus dan Rencana pelaksanaan Pembelajaran: mata pelajaran Bahasa Inggris SMP / MTs. Jakarta: Departemen pendidikan Nasional.

Callagan, M., And Rothery, J. (1988). Teaching Factual Writing. Sydney: Metropolitan East Disadvantaged Schools Program.

Christie, F., and Soosai. (2001). Language and Meaning. Sydney: Macmillan Education Australia.

Cope, B., and Kalantzis, M. (1993). The Power of Literacy and the Literacy of

Power. In Cope, B., Kalantzis, M. (1993). (Eds). The Power of Literacy . A Genre Approach to Teaching Writing. London: The Palmer Press.

Creswell, J. W., and Clark, V. L. P. (2007). Designing and Conducting Mixed

Methods Research. London: Sage Publications, Inc.

Creswell, J. W. (2008). Educational Research: planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. New Jersey: Pearson Education Inc.

Dawson, C. (2009). Introduction to Research Methods: a practical guide for anyone undertaking a research project (4th ed). Oxford: How to Books Ltd.


(27)

Derewianka, B. (2003). Trends and Issues in Genre Based Approach. RELC

Journal. Volume 34: 133. August 2003.

http://rel.sagepub.com/content/34/2/133. www.sagepublications.com. Access on 25 March 2011.

Dolya, G. (2007). Vygotsky in Action in the Early Years: the key to learning curriculum. London: Routledge.

Dornyei, Z. (2003). Questionnaires in Second Language Research. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.

Dornyei, Z. (2007). Research Methods in Applied Linguistics, Quantitative,

Qualitative and mix methodology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Effendi, Yusuf. (2007). The Implementation of Genre-Based Approach in EFL

Context. A thesis submitted to the School of Postgraduate Studies,

Indonesia University of Education, Bandung – Indonesia.

Eggins, S. (2004). An Introduction to Systemic Functional Linguistics. London: Continuum International Publishing Group.

Emilia, E. (2005). A Critical Genre Based Approach to Teaching Academic

Writing in a Tertary EFL Context in Indonesia. A Ph.D thesis submitted

to the University of Mealbourne.

Emilia, E. (2008). Menulis Tesis dan Disertasi. Bandung: Alpha Beta.

Emilia, E., Hermawan, B., and Tati, D. (2008). The Genre Based Approach in the

2006 Curriculum of English. Participatory Action Research in One Junior High School in Bandung, Indonesia. A research report submitted

to the English education department, Faculty of Language and Art Education, Indonesia University of Education, Bandung – Indonesia. Emilia, E. (2010). Teaching Writing. Developing Critical Learners. Bandung:

RIZQI Press.

Emilia, E., at al. (2010). Research Report (The First Year) of Genre Based

Approach in Teaching English in Indonesia. A Research conducted by

Indonesia University of Education and Sydney University. Indonesia University of Education, Bandung – Indonesia.

Emilia, E. (2011). Pendekatan Genre Based dalam Pengajaran Bahasa Inggris:


(28)

Feez, S., and Joyce, H. (1998). Writing Skills: narrative and non fiction text types. Melbourne: Pheonix Education Pty Ltd.

Fraenkel , J. R., and Wallen, N., E. (2000). How to Design and Evaluate Research

in Education. 4th edition. Boston: McGraw Hill.

Gerot, L., and Wignell, P. (1994). Making Sense of Functional Grammar. Queensland: Antipodean Educational Enterpress.

Gerot, L. (1995). Making Sense of text: the context – text relationship. Queensland: Antipodean Educational Enterpress.

Gibbons, P. (2002). Scaffolding Language and Scaffolding Learning: teaching second language learners in the mainstream classroom. Pourthsmouth, NH: Heineman.

Halliday, M. A. K. (1994). An Introduction to Functional Grammar. (2nd End).

London, Edward Arnold.

Harmer, J. (2002). The Practice of English Language Teaching. London: Longman

Hatch, E., and Lazaraton, A. (1991). The Research Manual: design and statistics

for applied linguistic. Boston; A Division of Wadsworth, Inc.

Hatch, E., and Farhady, H. (1982). Research Design and Statistics for Applied

Linguistics. Newburry House Publisher, INC.

Helmi, Junainah. (2008). The Implementation of Genre-Based Approach to

Teaching Writing Narrative Text. A thesis submitted to the School of

Postgraduate Studies, Indonesia University of Education, Bandung – Indonesia.

Hyland, K. (2004). Genre and Second Language Writing. London: The University of Michigan Press.

Hyland, K. (2007). Genre Pedagogy: language, literacy, and L2 writing instruction. Elsevier, Journal of Second Language Writing. Volume 16, 148-164. Available: www.sciencedirect.com. London: Elsevies. Inc. access on 16 February 2011.


(29)

Johns, A. M. (2002). Genre in the Classroom. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Association.

Kay, H., and Evans, T. D. (1998). Genre: What Teachers Think. ELT Journal. Volume 52; 308-314. Access on 18 October 2010.

Kartiwi, Eka. (2008). Teaching Reading Recount Text by Using Genre-Based

Approach: result and students’ responses. A thesis submitted to the

School of Postgraduate Studies, Indonesia University of Education, Bandung – Indonesia.

Knapp, P., and Watkins, M. (2009). Genre, Text, Grammar: technologies for teaching and assessing writing. Sydney: University of New SouthWales Press.

Kress, G. (1982). Learning to Write. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

Kvale, S. (1996). Interviews. An Inyroduction to Qualitative Research

Interviewing. London: Sage Publication Ltd.

Labaw, P. J. (1980). Advance Questionnaire Design. Cambridge

Lin, B. (2006). Ganre Based Teaching and Vygotskian Principles in EFL: the case of a university writing course. Asian EFL Journal Quarterly. September 2006, volume 8, issue 3, article 11, p. 69-90. Access on 15 March 2011. Martin, J. (1985). Factual Writing Exploring and Challenging Social Reality.

Deakin University.

Martin, J., Matthiessen, C. M. I. M., Painter, C. (1997). Working With Functional

Grammar. London: Arnold.

Martin, J., and Rose, D. (2008). Genre Relations: mapping culture. London: Equinox.

Mustriana, B. B., and Kurniawati, C. (2005). Let’s Talk, for Grade VIII Junior

High School (SMP / MTs). Bandung: Pakar Raya.

Oppenheim, A.N. (1982). Questionnaire Design and Attitude Measurement. London: Heinemann Educational Books Ltd.

Powell, E. T., and Renner, M. (2003). Program Development and Evaluation.

Analyzing Qualitative Data. Madison: University of Wisconsin, U.S.

Available: http://www.learningstore.uwex.edu/assets/pdfs (G3658-12). Access on 16 February 2011.


(30)

Powell, E. T. (2003). Program Development and Evaluation. Analyzing

Quantitative Data. Madison: University of Wisconsin, U.S.

http://www.learningstore.uwex.edu/assets/pdfs (G3658-6). Access on 26 June 2011.

Rodgers, T. (2001). Language Teaching Methodology. Available:

http://www.cal.org/ericell/digest/rodgers.html,ERIC Digest, September 2001. Access on 16 February 2011.

Ross, K. N. (2005). Quantitative Research Methods in Education Planning:

sample design for educational survey research. UNESCO.

Richards, J. C. (2002). Curriculum Development in Language Teaching. London: Cambridge University Press.

Safiuddin. (2008). The Implementation of Genre-Based Approach in Teaching

Writing a Descriptive Text: a case study at a madrasah aliyah in Demak.

A thesis submitted to the School of Postgraduate Studies, Indonesia University of Education, Bandung – Indonesia.

Sarwono, J. (2006). Analisis Data Penelitian Menggunakan SPSS. Yogyakarta: Andi Offset.

Suryana, D., et al. (2007). Expressive English for Junio High Schoo: grade VIII. Bandung: Angkasa.

Suzanna, Eliya. (2008). The Implementation of Genre-Based Approach to

Teaching Writing Exposition Texts. A thesis submitted to the School of

Postgraduate Studies, Indonesia University of Education, Bandung – Indonesia.

Swales, J, M. (1989). Genre Analysis. English in Academic and research Setting. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Thomas, R. M. (2003). Blending Qualitative and Quantitative Research Methods

in Theses and Dissertations. California: Corwin Press. Inc.

Thornbury, S. (2002). How to Teach Vocabulary. Edited by Harmer. Edinberg: Pearson Education Limited.

Tim Putra Nugraha. (2008). Cakarawala Cakap Kreatif dan Berkualitas. Surakarta: Putra Nugraha Press.


(31)

Tompkins, G. E. (2008). Teaching Writing: balancing process and product. Sydney: Pearson Education Ltd.

Van Lier, L. (1988). The Classroom and the Language Learner. Ethnography and Second- Language Classroom Research. New York: Longman Inc.

Wahana Komputer. (2002). 10 Model Penelitian dan Pengolahannya dengan

SPSS 10.01. Yogyakarta: Andi Offset.

Wardiman, A., and Jahur, M. B. (2008). English In Focus, for Grade VII Junior

High School (SMP / MTs). Bandung: Pusat Perbukuan Departemen

Pendidikan Nasional)

Workbook 1. Analyzing Quantitative Data. Available:

www.marketresearch.com/wallace/workbook1-quantitaiveanalysis.pdf. Access on 24 July 2011.

Yosefa, Rita. (2009). An Investigation on the Implementation of a Genre-Based

Approach: a case study at two junior high schools in Natma island,

Kepulauan Riau province. A thesis submitted to the School of Postgraduate Studies, Indonesia University of Education, Bandung – Indonesia.


(1)

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Anderson, M., and Anderson, K. (1997a). Text Types in English 1. Melbourne: Macmillan Education Australia.

Anderson, M., and Anderson, K. (1997b). Text Types in English 2. Melbourne: Macmillan Education Australia.

Badger, R., & George, W. (2000). A Process Genre Approach to Teaching Writing. ELT Journal. Volume 4(2): 153-160. Oxford University Press. Breure, L. (2001). Developing of Genre Concept. Netherlands: Information and

Computing Sciences University of Utrecht. ([email protected]).

BSNP. (2006). Paduan Penyusunan KTSP Jenjang Dasar dan Menengah. Jakarta: Departemen pendidikan Nasional.

BSNP. (2007). Model Silabus dan Rencana pelaksanaan Pembelajaran: mata pelajaran Bahasa Inggris SMP / MTs. Jakarta: Departemen pendidikan Nasional.

Callagan, M., And Rothery, J. (1988). Teaching Factual Writing. Sydney: Metropolitan East Disadvantaged Schools Program.

Christie, F., and Soosai. (2001). Language and Meaning. Sydney: Macmillan Education Australia.

Cope, B., and Kalantzis, M. (1993). The Power of Literacy and the Literacy of

Power. In Cope, B., Kalantzis, M. (1993). (Eds). The Power of Literacy . A Genre Approach to Teaching Writing. London: The Palmer Press.

Creswell, J. W., and Clark, V. L. P. (2007). Designing and Conducting Mixed

Methods Research. London: Sage Publications, Inc.

Creswell, J. W. (2008). Educational Research: planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. New Jersey: Pearson Education Inc.

Dawson, C. (2009). Introduction to Research Methods: a practical guide for anyone undertaking a research project (4th ed). Oxford: How to Books Ltd.


(2)

Derewianka, B. (2003). Trends and Issues in Genre Based Approach. RELC

Journal. Volume 34: 133. August 2003.

http://rel.sagepub.com/content/34/2/133. www.sagepublications.com. Access on 25 March 2011.

Dolya, G. (2007). Vygotsky in Action in the Early Years: the key to learning curriculum. London: Routledge.

Dornyei, Z. (2003). Questionnaires in Second Language Research. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.

Dornyei, Z. (2007). Research Methods in Applied Linguistics, Quantitative,

Qualitative and mix methodology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Effendi, Yusuf. (2007). The Implementation of Genre-Based Approach in EFL

Context. A thesis submitted to the School of Postgraduate Studies,

Indonesia University of Education, Bandung – Indonesia.

Eggins, S. (2004). An Introduction to Systemic Functional Linguistics. London: Continuum International Publishing Group.

Emilia, E. (2005). A Critical Genre Based Approach to Teaching Academic

Writing in a Tertary EFL Context in Indonesia. A Ph.D thesis submitted

to the University of Mealbourne.

Emilia, E. (2008). Menulis Tesis dan Disertasi. Bandung: Alpha Beta.

Emilia, E., Hermawan, B., and Tati, D. (2008). The Genre Based Approach in the

2006 Curriculum of English. Participatory Action Research in One Junior High School in Bandung, Indonesia. A research report submitted

to the English education department, Faculty of Language and Art Education, Indonesia University of Education, Bandung – Indonesia. Emilia, E. (2010). Teaching Writing. Developing Critical Learners. Bandung:

RIZQI Press.

Emilia, E., at al. (2010). Research Report (The First Year) of Genre Based

Approach in Teaching English in Indonesia. A Research conducted by

Indonesia University of Education and Sydney University. Indonesia University of Education, Bandung – Indonesia.


(3)

Feez, S., and Joyce, H. (1998). Writing Skills: narrative and non fiction text types. Melbourne: Pheonix Education Pty Ltd.

Fraenkel , J. R., and Wallen, N., E. (2000). How to Design and Evaluate Research

in Education. 4th edition. Boston: McGraw Hill.

Gerot, L., and Wignell, P. (1994). Making Sense of Functional Grammar. Queensland: Antipodean Educational Enterpress.

Gerot, L. (1995). Making Sense of text: the context – text relationship. Queensland: Antipodean Educational Enterpress.

Gibbons, P. (2002). Scaffolding Language and Scaffolding Learning: teaching second language learners in the mainstream classroom. Pourthsmouth, NH: Heineman.

Halliday, M. A. K. (1994). An Introduction to Functional Grammar. (2nd End).

London, Edward Arnold.

Harmer, J. (2002). The Practice of English Language Teaching. London: Longman

Hatch, E., and Lazaraton, A. (1991). The Research Manual: design and statistics

for applied linguistic. Boston; A Division of Wadsworth, Inc.

Hatch, E., and Farhady, H. (1982). Research Design and Statistics for Applied

Linguistics. Newburry House Publisher, INC.

Helmi, Junainah. (2008). The Implementation of Genre-Based Approach to

Teaching Writing Narrative Text. A thesis submitted to the School of

Postgraduate Studies, Indonesia University of Education, Bandung – Indonesia.

Hyland, K. (2004). Genre and Second Language Writing. London: The University of Michigan Press.

Hyland, K. (2007). Genre Pedagogy: language, literacy, and L2 writing instruction. Elsevier, Journal of Second Language Writing. Volume 16, 148-164. Available: www.sciencedirect.com. London: Elsevies. Inc. access on 16 February 2011.


(4)

Johns, A. M. (2002). Genre in the Classroom. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Association.

Kay, H., and Evans, T. D. (1998). Genre: What Teachers Think. ELT Journal. Volume 52; 308-314. Access on 18 October 2010.

Kartiwi, Eka. (2008). Teaching Reading Recount Text by Using Genre-Based

Approach: result and students’ responses. A thesis submitted to the

School of Postgraduate Studies, Indonesia University of Education, Bandung – Indonesia.

Knapp, P., and Watkins, M. (2009). Genre, Text, Grammar: technologies for teaching and assessing writing. Sydney: University of New SouthWales Press.

Kress, G. (1982). Learning to Write. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

Kvale, S. (1996). Interviews. An Inyroduction to Qualitative Research

Interviewing. London: Sage Publication Ltd.

Labaw, P. J. (1980). Advance Questionnaire Design. Cambridge

Lin, B. (2006). Ganre Based Teaching and Vygotskian Principles in EFL: the case of a university writing course. Asian EFL Journal Quarterly. September 2006, volume 8, issue 3, article 11, p. 69-90. Access on 15 March 2011. Martin, J. (1985). Factual Writing Exploring and Challenging Social Reality.

Deakin University.

Martin, J., Matthiessen, C. M. I. M., Painter, C. (1997). Working With Functional

Grammar. London: Arnold.

Martin, J., and Rose, D. (2008). Genre Relations: mapping culture. London: Equinox.

Mustriana, B. B., and Kurniawati, C. (2005). Let’s Talk, for Grade VIII Junior

High School (SMP / MTs). Bandung: Pakar Raya.

Oppenheim, A.N. (1982). Questionnaire Design and Attitude Measurement. London: Heinemann Educational Books Ltd.

Powell, E. T., and Renner, M. (2003). Program Development and Evaluation.

Analyzing Qualitative Data. Madison: University of Wisconsin, U.S.


(5)

Powell, E. T. (2003). Program Development and Evaluation. Analyzing

Quantitative Data. Madison: University of Wisconsin, U.S. http://www.learningstore.uwex.edu/assets/pdfs (G3658-6). Access on 26 June 2011.

Rodgers, T. (2001). Language Teaching Methodology. Available:

http://www.cal.org/ericell/digest/rodgers.html,ERIC Digest, September 2001. Access on 16 February 2011.

Ross, K. N. (2005). Quantitative Research Methods in Education Planning:

sample design for educational survey research. UNESCO.

Richards, J. C. (2002). Curriculum Development in Language Teaching. London: Cambridge University Press.

Safiuddin. (2008). The Implementation of Genre-Based Approach in Teaching

Writing a Descriptive Text: a case study at a madrasah aliyah in Demak.

A thesis submitted to the School of Postgraduate Studies, Indonesia University of Education, Bandung – Indonesia.

Sarwono, J. (2006). Analisis Data Penelitian Menggunakan SPSS. Yogyakarta: Andi Offset.

Suryana, D., et al. (2007). Expressive English for Junio High Schoo: grade VIII. Bandung: Angkasa.

Suzanna, Eliya. (2008). The Implementation of Genre-Based Approach to

Teaching Writing Exposition Texts. A thesis submitted to the School of

Postgraduate Studies, Indonesia University of Education, Bandung – Indonesia.

Swales, J, M. (1989). Genre Analysis. English in Academic and research Setting. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Thomas, R. M. (2003). Blending Qualitative and Quantitative Research Methods

in Theses and Dissertations. California: Corwin Press. Inc.

Thornbury, S. (2002). How to Teach Vocabulary. Edited by Harmer. Edinberg: Pearson Education Limited.

Tim Putra Nugraha. (2008). Cakarawala Cakap Kreatif dan Berkualitas. Surakarta: Putra Nugraha Press.


(6)

Tompkins, G. E. (2008). Teaching Writing: balancing process and product. Sydney: Pearson Education Ltd.

Van Lier, L. (1988). The Classroom and the Language Learner. Ethnography and Second- Language Classroom Research. New York: Longman Inc.

Wahana Komputer. (2002). 10 Model Penelitian dan Pengolahannya dengan

SPSS 10.01. Yogyakarta: Andi Offset.

Wardiman, A., and Jahur, M. B. (2008). English In Focus, for Grade VII Junior

High School (SMP / MTs). Bandung: Pusat Perbukuan Departemen

Pendidikan Nasional)

Workbook 1. Analyzing Quantitative Data. Available:

www.marketresearch.com/wallace/workbook1-quantitaiveanalysis.pdf. Access on 24 July 2011.

Yosefa, Rita. (2009). An Investigation on the Implementation of a Genre-Based

Approach: a case study at two junior high schools in Natma island,

Kepulauan Riau province. A thesis submitted to the School of Postgraduate Studies, Indonesia University of Education, Bandung – Indonesia.