S BIO 1205674 Bibliography
DAFTAR PUSTAKA
Arikunto. (2006). Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktik. Jakarta: Rineka
Cipta
Arikunto, S. (2012). Dasar-Dasar Evaluasi Pendidikan Jilid 2. Jakarta: Bumi
Aksara
Aryulina D. (2006). Biologi SMA Kelas XI. Jakarta: Erlangga
Association of American Colleges and Universities. (2011). Quantitative Literacy
Value Rubric. Association of American Colleges and Universities
Beaudrie, B. (2007). The Numeracy Action Plan: The Case for Quantitative
Literacy in The State of New Hampsire. CBE-Life Science Education
9:323-332
Brunken, R., Seufert, T., Paas, F. (2010). Measuring Cognitive Load. Cambridge
University Press: New York.
De Jong, T. (2010). Cognitive Load Theory, Educational research, and
instructional design. International Science. 38(2):105-134
Frith, V.& Gunston, G. (2011). Towards Understanding The Quantitative Literacy
Demands of A Firstyear Medical Curriculum. African Journal of Health
Professions Education. 3(1):19-23.
Gulo, W. (2002). Strategi Belajar Mengajar. Jakarta: Grasindo
Hadiyana, L. (2011). Pengaruh Pendekatan Keterampilan Proses Sains terhadap
Hasil Belajar Biologi Siswa. Jakarta: UIN
Kalyuga, S.(2011). Informing: A Cognitive Load perspective. The International
Journal of an Emerging Transdiscipline, 4(1)
Karamustafaoglu, S. (2011). Improving The Science Process Skills Ability of
Science Students Teachers Using I Diagrams. Eurasian J. Phys Chem. Educ.
3(1): 26-38
Lufri. (2007). Strategi Pembelajaran Biologi. Padang: UNP Press
Matlyn, Margareth W,. (2009). Cognitive Psychology. New Jersey: John Wiley
&Son, Inc.
Mayer, R E, Moreno, R.(2003). Nine Ways to Reduce Cognitve Load in
Multimedia Learning. Educational Psychologist.38,(1), 43-52
67
Dyah Putri Alifiani, 2016
ANALISIS BEBAN KOGNITIF SISWA SMA PADA PEMBELAJARAN SISTEM PERNAPASAN DENGAN
PENDEKATAN INKUIRI DALAM MENINGKATKAN KEMAMPUAN LITERASI KUANTITATIF
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu | perpustakaan.upi.edu
68
Meissner, B dan Bogner, F.X. (2013). Towards Cognitive Load Theory as
Guideline for Instructional Design in Science Education. World of Journal
Education. 3(2), 24-37.
Merriënboer, Van.J.J.G. and Sweller, John.(2005). Cognitive Load Theory and
Complex Learning: Recent Development and Future Direction.
Educational Psychology Review.17, 147-178
Moreno, R., dan Park, B. (2010). Cognitive Load Theory: Historical development
and relation to other theories dalam Cognitive Load Theory. Dalam Plass
J.L. Moreno R. Cognitive Load Theory.Cambridge: Cambridge University
Press.
Paas, F., Renk, ., Sweller, J.(2003). Cognitive Load Theory and Instructional
Design: Recent Development. Educational Psychologist.38(1): 1-4
Rahmat, A & Hindriana, A.F..(2014). “Beban Kognitif Mahasiswa Dalam
Pembelajaran Fungsi Terintegrasi Struktur Tumbuhan Berbasis Dimensi
Belajar”. Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan.
Richardson, M & McCallum. (2002). The Third R in Literacy. [Online] tersedia di
http://math.arizona.edu/~wmc/Research/Quantitative_Literacy.pdf.
[10
November 2015]
Rustaman, N. (2005). Perkembangan Penelitian Pembelajaran Berbasis Inkuiri
Dalam Pendidikan Sains. Bandung: Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
Saliman. (2015). Pendekatan Inkuiri Dalam Pembelajaran. Jogjakarta: UNY
Scharfenberg, Bogner, F. (2010). A New Two-Step Approach for Hands-On
Teaching of Gene Technology: Effects on Students Activities During
Experimentation in an Outreach Gene Technology Lab. Research in Scence
Education. 41(4): 505-523
Sugiyono. (2007). Statistika Untuk Penelitian. Bandung: Alfabeta
Survani, Rifki., dkk. (2014). Kemampuan Analisis Informasi Versus Usaha
Mental Mahasiswa Dalam Perkuliahan Anatomi Tumbuhan Untuk
menunjang Literasi Kuantitatif. Proceeding Mathematics and Sciences
Forum 2014 361-366
Survani, R. (2014). Pengukuran Cognitive Load Mahasiswa Biologi Pada
Perkuliahan Anatomi Tumbuhan yang Berbasis Quantitative Literacy.
(Tesis). Sekolah Pascasarjana, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia,
Bandung.
Sweller, J. (1994). Cognitive Load Theory, learning difficulty, and instructional
design. Journal of Learning and Instruction. 4(1), 295-312
Taylor, C H. (2009). “Assessing Quantitative Reasoning”. Numeracy. 2
Dyah Putri Alifiani, 2016
ANALISIS BEBAN KOGNITIF SISWA SMA PADA PEMBELAJARAN SISTEM PERNAPASAN DENGAN
PENDEKATAN INKUIRI DALAM MENINGKATKAN KEMAMPUAN LITERASI KUANTITATIF
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu | perpustakaan.upi.edu
69
Yovan. (2008). Memori dan Pembelajaran Efektif. Jakarta: Yrama Widya
Wenning, C.J. (2004) Levels of Inquiry: Herarchies of Pedagogical Practices and
Inquiry Processes. J.Phys.Teach.educ.online
Dyah Putri Alifiani, 2016
ANALISIS BEBAN KOGNITIF SISWA SMA PADA PEMBELAJARAN SISTEM PERNAPASAN DENGAN
PENDEKATAN INKUIRI DALAM MENINGKATKAN KEMAMPUAN LITERASI KUANTITATIF
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu | perpustakaan.upi.edu
Arikunto. (2006). Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktik. Jakarta: Rineka
Cipta
Arikunto, S. (2012). Dasar-Dasar Evaluasi Pendidikan Jilid 2. Jakarta: Bumi
Aksara
Aryulina D. (2006). Biologi SMA Kelas XI. Jakarta: Erlangga
Association of American Colleges and Universities. (2011). Quantitative Literacy
Value Rubric. Association of American Colleges and Universities
Beaudrie, B. (2007). The Numeracy Action Plan: The Case for Quantitative
Literacy in The State of New Hampsire. CBE-Life Science Education
9:323-332
Brunken, R., Seufert, T., Paas, F. (2010). Measuring Cognitive Load. Cambridge
University Press: New York.
De Jong, T. (2010). Cognitive Load Theory, Educational research, and
instructional design. International Science. 38(2):105-134
Frith, V.& Gunston, G. (2011). Towards Understanding The Quantitative Literacy
Demands of A Firstyear Medical Curriculum. African Journal of Health
Professions Education. 3(1):19-23.
Gulo, W. (2002). Strategi Belajar Mengajar. Jakarta: Grasindo
Hadiyana, L. (2011). Pengaruh Pendekatan Keterampilan Proses Sains terhadap
Hasil Belajar Biologi Siswa. Jakarta: UIN
Kalyuga, S.(2011). Informing: A Cognitive Load perspective. The International
Journal of an Emerging Transdiscipline, 4(1)
Karamustafaoglu, S. (2011). Improving The Science Process Skills Ability of
Science Students Teachers Using I Diagrams. Eurasian J. Phys Chem. Educ.
3(1): 26-38
Lufri. (2007). Strategi Pembelajaran Biologi. Padang: UNP Press
Matlyn, Margareth W,. (2009). Cognitive Psychology. New Jersey: John Wiley
&Son, Inc.
Mayer, R E, Moreno, R.(2003). Nine Ways to Reduce Cognitve Load in
Multimedia Learning. Educational Psychologist.38,(1), 43-52
67
Dyah Putri Alifiani, 2016
ANALISIS BEBAN KOGNITIF SISWA SMA PADA PEMBELAJARAN SISTEM PERNAPASAN DENGAN
PENDEKATAN INKUIRI DALAM MENINGKATKAN KEMAMPUAN LITERASI KUANTITATIF
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu | perpustakaan.upi.edu
68
Meissner, B dan Bogner, F.X. (2013). Towards Cognitive Load Theory as
Guideline for Instructional Design in Science Education. World of Journal
Education. 3(2), 24-37.
Merriënboer, Van.J.J.G. and Sweller, John.(2005). Cognitive Load Theory and
Complex Learning: Recent Development and Future Direction.
Educational Psychology Review.17, 147-178
Moreno, R., dan Park, B. (2010). Cognitive Load Theory: Historical development
and relation to other theories dalam Cognitive Load Theory. Dalam Plass
J.L. Moreno R. Cognitive Load Theory.Cambridge: Cambridge University
Press.
Paas, F., Renk, ., Sweller, J.(2003). Cognitive Load Theory and Instructional
Design: Recent Development. Educational Psychologist.38(1): 1-4
Rahmat, A & Hindriana, A.F..(2014). “Beban Kognitif Mahasiswa Dalam
Pembelajaran Fungsi Terintegrasi Struktur Tumbuhan Berbasis Dimensi
Belajar”. Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan.
Richardson, M & McCallum. (2002). The Third R in Literacy. [Online] tersedia di
http://math.arizona.edu/~wmc/Research/Quantitative_Literacy.pdf.
[10
November 2015]
Rustaman, N. (2005). Perkembangan Penelitian Pembelajaran Berbasis Inkuiri
Dalam Pendidikan Sains. Bandung: Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
Saliman. (2015). Pendekatan Inkuiri Dalam Pembelajaran. Jogjakarta: UNY
Scharfenberg, Bogner, F. (2010). A New Two-Step Approach for Hands-On
Teaching of Gene Technology: Effects on Students Activities During
Experimentation in an Outreach Gene Technology Lab. Research in Scence
Education. 41(4): 505-523
Sugiyono. (2007). Statistika Untuk Penelitian. Bandung: Alfabeta
Survani, Rifki., dkk. (2014). Kemampuan Analisis Informasi Versus Usaha
Mental Mahasiswa Dalam Perkuliahan Anatomi Tumbuhan Untuk
menunjang Literasi Kuantitatif. Proceeding Mathematics and Sciences
Forum 2014 361-366
Survani, R. (2014). Pengukuran Cognitive Load Mahasiswa Biologi Pada
Perkuliahan Anatomi Tumbuhan yang Berbasis Quantitative Literacy.
(Tesis). Sekolah Pascasarjana, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia,
Bandung.
Sweller, J. (1994). Cognitive Load Theory, learning difficulty, and instructional
design. Journal of Learning and Instruction. 4(1), 295-312
Taylor, C H. (2009). “Assessing Quantitative Reasoning”. Numeracy. 2
Dyah Putri Alifiani, 2016
ANALISIS BEBAN KOGNITIF SISWA SMA PADA PEMBELAJARAN SISTEM PERNAPASAN DENGAN
PENDEKATAN INKUIRI DALAM MENINGKATKAN KEMAMPUAN LITERASI KUANTITATIF
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu | perpustakaan.upi.edu
69
Yovan. (2008). Memori dan Pembelajaran Efektif. Jakarta: Yrama Widya
Wenning, C.J. (2004) Levels of Inquiry: Herarchies of Pedagogical Practices and
Inquiry Processes. J.Phys.Teach.educ.online
Dyah Putri Alifiani, 2016
ANALISIS BEBAN KOGNITIF SISWA SMA PADA PEMBELAJARAN SISTEM PERNAPASAN DENGAN
PENDEKATAN INKUIRI DALAM MENINGKATKAN KEMAMPUAN LITERASI KUANTITATIF
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu | perpustakaan.upi.edu