[WFS FES] A Semantic Maturity Model for Web Feature Services

All Fields marked with * are mandatory.
Change Request 247
#:
Assigned OGC 12-131
Document #:
Name: *Stephen Desmond
Organization: *Land Information New Zealand
Email: *sdesmond@linz.govt.nz
Document
Name/Version:

*Web Feature Service 2.0 Interface Standard (also ISO 19142) / 2.0

OGC Project
Document:

*09-025r1

If this is a revision of a previous submission and you have a Change Request Number, then check here:
Enter the CR number here:
Enter the Revsion Number that you are revising here:

Title:
Source:

* [WFS/FES } A Semantic Maturity Model for Web Feature Services
*Land Information New Zealand

Work item code:

Category:

* B (Addition of feature)

Reason for *
change:

This is a useful insight that deserves wider circulation.

Summary of *
change:

WFS developers have a choice between four approaches to choosing or
> developing a GML schema. There are cost and benefit trade-offs for each one.
> 1. �Entry Level�, using the Simple Features Profile.
> 2. Using a locally developed one-off schema and middleware.
> 3. Using a Community, but localised one-off schema.
> 4. Using a Standardized schema such as CityGML

Consequences if Projects may choose an option not best suited to their
> circumstances
not approved:

Clauses affected: *
This could be a new Annexe in the next version of the WFS Spec, or a
free standing document, "Best Practices Guide"

Additional
Documents
affected:
Supporting

Documentation:
Comments:
Status:

Assigned To:

Disposition:

Assigned

WFS/FES SWG

Referred and Posted