The Result of Autocorrelation Test The Result of Heteroscedasticity Test

62

b. The Result of Multicollinearity Test

Detection of multicollinearity can be seen, that if the value of Variance Inflation Factor VIF of not more than 10 and the value of tolerance is no less than 0.1, it can be said to be free of multicollinearity. VIF values and tolerance of other research variables can be seen from the following table. Table 4.5 Results Multicollinearity Test Model Collinearity Statistics Tolerance VIF 1 Constant BOD .766 1.306 BOI .752 1.329 MO .871 1.148 IO .819 1.221 a. Dependent Variable: ROA Source: Secondary Data Output From SPSS 18 Based on table 4.4 above, it can be concluded this research free of multicollinearity. All independent variables have VIF values less than 10. In addition, each independent variable have a tolerance value is greater than 0.1. Thus there is no multicollinearity in this regression model.

c. The Result of Autocorrelation Test

How that can be done to detect the presence or absence of autocorrelation is the Durbin-Watson test DW. Here is the Durbin-Watson test result: 63 Table 4.6 Result Autocorrelation Durbin Watson test MODEL DURBIN WATSON 1 2.011 Source: Secondary Data Output From SPSS 18 The criteria for the assessment of the autocorrelation are: 1 If 0 Dw DL there is any positive autocorrelation. 2 If DL Dw Du or 4-Du D 4-DL uncertain conclusion. 3 If Du Dw 4-Du there is no autocorrelation. 4 If 4-DL Dw 4 there is any negative autocorrelation. From the table 4.5 above, note that the value obtained for DW 2.011 which these score will be compared to the table of significant 5. The sample chosen is 285 and the total of independent variable is 4 k=4, so that in the Durbin Watson table it can be obtain with the value. 64 Table 4.7 Durbin Watson Test Bound a = 5 N k=1 k=2 k=3 k=4 k=5 dL dU dL dU dL dU dL dU dL dU 10 0.8791 1.3197 0.6972 1.6413 0.5253 2.0163 0.3760 2.4137 0.2427 2.8217 20 1.2015 1.4107 1.1004 1.5367 0.9976 1.6763 0.8943 1.8283 0.7918 1.9908 . . . . . . . . . . . 200 1.7584 1.7785 1.7483 1.7887 1.7382 1.7990 1.7279 1.8094 1.7176 1.8199 Sources: http:www.standford.edu After refers to the table above, the value means including the third criteria, Du= 1.8094 Dw 2.011 4-Du=2.1906 so it can be concluded that the regression model free from autocorrelation.

d. The Result of Heteroscedasticity Test

This test is done by observing certain chart patterns scatterplot, where if there is a point-point spread above and below the 0 on the Y axis and does not constitute that it does not happen heteroscedasticity Ghozali, 2013 : 139. Scatterplot graphs can be seen in figure below. 65 Figure 4.8 Source: Secondary Data Output From SPSS 18 From figure 4.3 shown that there is no clear pattern, as well as the dots spread above and below zero 0 on the Y axis. So it can be concluded that there is no heterocedastisity.

3. Coefficient of Determination R

Dokumen yang terkait

The influence of good corporate governance and family involvement towards firm performance in family firm in Indonesia stock exchange

0 14 119

The Influence Of Earnings Management On Firm Value And Good Corporate Governance As Moderating Variable: Empirical Studies Real Estate And Properties Companies Listed In Indonesia Stock Exchange Period 2012-2014

0 4 135

The Influence of Good Corporate Governance (GCG) Implementation Toward Quality Sustainability Reporting (SR) Disclosure (Survey on Indonesia Companies Listed in Indonesia Stock Exchange)

0 2 124

INTRODUCTION THE EFFECT OF CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY TO STOCK RETURN ON INDONESIAN LISTED COMPANIES (Empirical study of the Manufacturing Companies listed on Indonesia Stock Exchange During the Period 2008-2009).

0 3 7

CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY AND HYPOTHESIS THE EFFECT OF CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY TO STOCK RETURN ON INDONESIAN LISTED COMPANIES (Empirical study of the Manufacturing Companies listed on Indonesia Stock Exchange During the Period 2008-2009).

0 3 23

THE EFFECTS OF GOOD CORPORATE GOVERNANCE ONCOMPANY PERFORMANCE THE EFFECTS OF GOOD CORPORATE GOVERNANCE ON COMPANY PERFORMANCE (Empirical study on the Manufacturing Companies listed on Indonesia Stock Exchange During the Period 2007-2009).

0 3 13

INTRODUCTION THE EFFECTS OF GOOD CORPORATE GOVERNANCE ON COMPANY PERFORMANCE (Empirical study on the Manufacturing Companies listed on Indonesia Stock Exchange During the Period 2007-2009).

0 2 8

GOOD CORPORATE GOVERNANCE & HYPOTHESIS THE EFFECTS OF GOOD CORPORATE GOVERNANCE ON COMPANY PERFORMANCE (Empirical study on the Manufacturing Companies listed on Indonesia Stock Exchange During the Period 2007-2009).

0 3 16

CONCLUSION AND SUGGESTION THE EFFECTS OF GOOD CORPORATE GOVERNANCE ON COMPANY PERFORMANCE (Empirical study on the Manufacturing Companies listed on Indonesia Stock Exchange During the Period 2007-2009).

0 2 27

THE INFLUENCE OF CORPORATE GOVERNANCE IMPLEMENTATION TOWARD BANK PERFORMANCE (Empirical Study on Banks Listed in Indonesian Stock Exchange)

0 0 11