Results Directory UMM :Data Elmu:jurnal:J-a:Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology:Vol252.Issue2.Sept2000:

I . Ibarrola et al. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 252 2000 199 –219 203 2.4. Statistical procedures Significant effects promoted by food quality ql and quantity qn on histological measurements and enzyme activities in the acute and acclimated responses of cockles were analyzed by performing two factor analysis of variance Zar, 1984. The arcosin transformation was used to normalize the data corresponding to histological parameters which are expressed as percentage. The effect promoted by acclimation to the different diets was analyzed by testing for significant differences t-test between the mean values obtained for the acute and acclimated responses. Possible functional relationship between enzyme activities and digestive structures was analyzed by calculation of the correlation indexes between specific activities and volume densities of the different digestive structures.

3. Results

3.1. Stereology of the digestive tubule Table 1 shows the results of the stereological analysis. Digestive and basophilic cells account, respectively, for 60–70 and 13–17 of the volume of the digestive tubules irrespective of the feeding condition. Cellular fragments represent a minor proportion of the total volume maximum value of 11.5. Significant differences exerted by food quality and quantity on the histological parameters of cockles fed for 3 and 11 days are shown in Table 2. In the acute response, the proportion of digestive cells increased with rising rations of low quality food and decreased with increasing rations of high quality Table 1 a Volumetric fractions of the main components of the digestive tubules Diet VF VF VF VF D B L F.S. S 0.65960.060 0.16860.057 0.13960.088 0.03460.024 3 S 0.67360.078 0.09960.039 0.17960.039 0.04760.086 11 Ll 0.61060.112 0.13560.036 0.14060.037 0.11560.103 3 Ll 0.67260.038 0.14660.023 0.12960.051 0.05360.010 11 Lh 0.68360.042 0.16460.032 0.10860.010 0.04560.019 3 Lh 0.69460.021 0.15860.023 0.10760.034 0.04160.013 11 Hl 0.72360.028 0.16660.026 0.08360.020 0.03060.015 3 Hl 0.63960.125 0.14460.023 0.15660.031 0.06160.094 11 Hh 0.61260.051 0.15060.028 0.14160.034 0.09760.065 3 Hh 0.65260.066 0.19560.032 0.12560.078 0.02960.010 11 a VF , volumetric fraction of digestive cells; VF , volumetric fraction of basophilic cells; VF , volumetric D B L fraction of the light of the tubules; VF , volumetric fraction of fragmentation spherules. Values are F.S. means6S.D. n 5 5. S, starved; Ll, low quality food dosed at low ration; Lh, low quality dosed at high ration; Hl, high quality food dosed at low ration; Hh, high quality food dosed at high ration. The subindex 3 and 11 are used to indicate, respectively, acute 3 days and acclimated 11 days responses. Significant differences Fischer, P , 0.05 between short and long-term responses. 204 I . Ibarrola et al. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 252 2000 199 –219 Table 2 Summary of the two factor analysis of variance testing the effects of food quality ql and quantity qn on the histological measurements recorded in the acute response Source of variation df MS SS F P Acute response Stereology of digestive tubules Digestive cells ql 1 7.7 7.7 0.490 0.4939 qn 1 7.582 7.582 0.479 0.4987 Interaction 1 154.179 154.179 9.814 0.0064 Error 16 251.371 15.711 Basophilic cells ql 1 3.019 3.019 0.503 0.4885 qn 1 1.507 1.507 0.251 0.6232 Interaction 1 17.391 17.391 2.896 0.1081 Error 16 96.083 6.005 Cellular fragments ql 1 14.013 14.013 0.402 0.5351 qn 1 2.520 2.520 0.072 0.7915 Interaction 1 238.747 238.747 6.846 0.0187 Error 16 658.024 34.876 Morphometry of the digestive tubules Mean epithelial thickness MET ql 1 31.715 31.715 3.469 0.0810 qn 1 2.930 2.93 0.320 0.5792 Interaction 1 29.890 29.890 3.269 0.0894 Error 16 146.272 9.142 Mean diverticular radium MDR ql 1 12.845 12.845 0.760 0.3964 qn 1 59.027 59.027 3.490 0.0801 Interaction 1 13.168 13.168 0.779 0.3906 Error 16 270.576 Classification of digestive tubules Absorptive phase ql 1 1594.077 1594.077 9.368 0.0075 qn 1 247.709 247.709 1.456 0.2452 Interaction 1 339.768 339.768 1.997 0.1768 Error 16 2722.621 170.116 Disintegrating phase ql 1 1485.398 1485.398 8.429 0.0111 qn 1 258.337 258.337 1.435 0.2485 Interaction 1 344.118 344.118 1.911 0.1768 Error 16 2881.154 180.072 Stereology of lysosomes Volume density VD 26 26 ql 1 3.92 3 10 3.92 3 10 0.767 0.3942 25 25 qn 1 1.20 3 10 1.20 3 10 2.345 0.1452 25 25 Interaction 1 2.38 3 10 2.38 3 10 4.667 0.0462 25 26 Error 16 8.18 3 10 5.12 3 10 Numerical density ND 25 25 ql 1 7.94 3 10 7.94 3 10 12.678 0.0026 27 27 qn 1 1.03 3 10 1.03 3 10 0.016 0.8994 26 26 Interaction 1 3.41 3 10 3.41 3 10 0.545 0.4713 I . Ibarrola et al. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 252 2000 199 –219 205 Table 2. Continued Source of variation df MS SS F P 24 26 Error 16 1.00 3 10 6.23 3 10 Surface to volume ratio S V ql 1 2.771 2.771 6.417 0.0221 qn 1 1.312 1.312 3.038 0.1005 Interaction 1 1.429 1.429 3.309 0.0877 Error 16 6.910 0.432 Surface density SD 25 25 ql 1 2.11 3 10 2.11 3 10 0.547 0.4704 25 25 qn 1 5.72 3 10 5.72 3 10 1.481 0.2412 24 24 Interaction 1 1.55 3 10 1.55 3 10 4.026 0.0620 24 25 Error 16 6.18 3 10 3.86 3 10 Acclimated response Stereology of digestive tubules Digestive cells ql 1 24.244 24.244 1.254 0.279 qn 1 5.182 5.182 0.268 0.611 Interaction 1 0.606 0.606 0.031 0.862 Error 16 309.347 19.334 Basophilic cells ql 1 8.141 8.141 2.099 0.169 qn 1 27.990 27.990 7.218 0.016 Interaction 1 10.629 10.629 2.741 0.117 Error 16 62.043 3.878 Cellular fragments ql 1 13.938 13.938 0.560 0.465 qn 1 16.895 16.895 0.679 0.422 Interaction 1 0.244 0.244 0.010 0.922 Error 16 397.925 24.870 Morphometry of the digestive tubules Mean epithelial thickness MET ql 1 5.222 5.222 0.399 0.537 qn 1 10.909 10.909 0.833 0.375 Interaction 1 7.222 7.222 0.552 0.468 Error 16 209.503 13.094 Mean diverticular radium MDR ql 1 15.247 15.247 0.753 0.398 qn 1 9.091 9.091 0.445 0.514 Interaction 1 57.570 57.570 2.843 0.111 Error 16 324.039 20.252 Classification of digestive tubules Absorptive tubules ql 1 505.515 505.515 1.805 0.198 qn 1 111.723 111.723 0.399 0.537 Interaction 1 6.856 6.856 0.024 0.877 Error 16 4481.453 280.091 Disintegrating phase 206 I . Ibarrola et al. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 252 2000 199 –219 Table 2. Continued Source of variation df MS SS F P ql 1 483.439 483.439 1.598 0.224 qn 1 104.014 104.014 0.344 0.566 Interaction 1 6.555 6.555 0.022 0.885 Error 16 4841.422 302.589 Stereology of lysosomes Volume density VD 25 25 ql 1 5.3 3 10 5.3 3 10 1.983 0.183 25 25 qn 1 1.8 3 10 1.8 3 10 0.679 0.425 29 29 24 Interaction 1 6.1 3 10 6.1 3 10 2.29 3 10 0.988 25 24 Error 13 2.6 3 10 3.4 3 10 Numerical density ND 27 27 ql 1 8.2 3 10 8.2 3 10 0.069 0.797 25 25 qn 1 2.9 3 10 2.9 3 10 2.476 0.140 26 29 Interaction 1 1.7 3 10 6.1 3 10 0.141 0.713 25 24 Error 13 1.2 3 10 1.5 3 10 Surface to volume ratio S V ql 1 0.162 0.162 0.169 0.688 qn 1 2.166 2.166 2.251 0.157 Interaction 1 0.121 0.121 0.126 0.728 Error 13 0.962 12.507 Surface density SD 24 24 ql 1 1.2 3 10 1.2 3 10 2.528 0.136 26 26 qn 1 9.4 3 10 9.4 3 10 0.205 0.658 27 27 Interaction 1 6.0 3 10 6.0 3 10 0.013 0.910 25 Error 13 4.6 3 10 0.001 food Table 1, and thus, the interaction ql 3 qn appears as a significant factor affecting VF Table 2. Consistently, the inverse trend is evident for VF . Significant D CF modifications of the volumetric fractions of the digestive tubules of cockles after acclimation to diets have been indicated with asterisks in Table 1. The volumetric fraction of basophilic cells increased significantly in cockles acclimated to Hh diet whereas decreased significantly after prolonged starvation. 3.2. Morphometry of the digestive tubules Results of the planimetric analysis of tubules have been plotted in Fig. 1. Two factor variance analysis performed for both short- and long-term responses Table 2 indicates no significant differences in mean diverticular radium and mean epithelial thickness of tubules from cockles fed on different food qualities and rations. In the short-term 3 days response, mean diverticular radius MDR of digestive tubules of starved cockles were not significantly different to that of cockles fed on Ll 3 diet. However, cockles presenting higher ingestion rates of organic matter i.e. Lh , Hl 3 3 and Hh had significantly bigger tubules and presented larger standard deviations than 3 starved ones. After acclimation, MDR increased in all feeding conditions Fig. 1, however, since standard deviations also rose, this generalized increment was not statistically significant in the variance analysis shown in Table 2. In consequence, after I . Ibarrola et al. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 252 2000 199 –219 207 Fig. 1. Mean diverticular radium mm and mean epithelial thickness mm of cockles starved S or fed different food quantities and qualities Ll, Lh, Hl and Hh for 3 days hollow bars and 11 days solid bars. Values are means6S.D. n 5 5. The asterisks indicate significant differences between mean values from the 3rd and 11th day t-test, P , 0.005. 208 I . Ibarrola et al. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 252 2000 199 –219 acclimation, cockles were found to have significantly higher MDR than starved ones in all feeding conditions. Both epithelial thickness and diverticular radius are one-dimensional measurements characterizing a three-dimensional structure. Thus, slight changes in such measurements are likely to represent large variations in terms of volume. Total volume of a tubule can 3 be considered to be proportional to the cubic of the diverticular radius MDR . In Fig. 3 2, mean dry weight shown in Table 5 is plotted against the estimated mean MDR to analyze to what extent the weight increase of the gland could be attributed to the size increment of digestive tubules. As previously reported Ibarrola et al., 1996, 1998b, the increment of the dry weight of the gland may play a significant role in the enzymatic response of the cockles. A good correlation is evident between both parameters with the exception of cockles acclimated to Lh and Hh whose digestive gland weight lay above the relationship. 3.3. Classification of digestive phases Table 3 shows the percentage of the different tubule types in the digestive gland of cockles. In all conditions, including starved cockles, disintegrating tubules account for the main proportion of tubules Hl diet being the exception in the sense that absorptive 3 Fig. 2. Dry weight mg of the digestive gland as a function of the estimated volume of a single digestive tubule in cockles fed different diets Ll, triangles; Lh, rhombs; Hl, circles and Hh, squares for 3 days hollow symbols and 11 days solid symbols. Estimation of a tubule equivalent volume was calculated as its 3 3 corresponding mean MDR . Values are means6S.D.; n 5 10, for the dry weight and 5 for MDR . The line was fitted by eye. I . Ibarrola et al. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 252 2000 199 –219 209 Table 3 a Classification of digestive phases Diet A D H R S 33.2618.5 58.0625.3 8.8610.4 3 S 38.0624.8 49.6630.4 12.467.3 11 Ll 16.8614.0 82.0615.2 1.261.8 3 Ll 26.2621.0 71.8622.9 2.062.0 11 Lh 16.8611.4 82.0613.9 1.262.7 3 Lh 30.0614.4 68.0616.3 2.063.5 11 Hl 55.6613.0 44.0612.3 0.460.9 3 Hl 39.6628.9 58.4629.8 2.063.5 11 Hh 31.2631.5 68.8631.5 3 Hh 48.4632.8 50.0633.4 0.460.9 1.262.7 11 a Results are expressed as percentage. A, absorptive phase; D, disintegrating phase; H, holding phase; R, reconstituting phase. Values are means6S.D. n 5 5. S, starved; Ll, low quality food dosed at low ration; Lh, low quality dosed at high ration; Hl, high quality food dosed at low ration; Hh, high quality food dosed at high ration. The subindex 3 and 11 are used to indicate, respectively, acute 3 days and acclimated 11 days responses. tubules are prevalent over disintegrating. Holding and reconstituting tubules accounted only for a marginal proportion. Cockles fed high quality diets for 3 days had significantly higher proportions of tubules in absorptive phase and lower proportions in disintegrating phase than those fed low qualities, thus, food quality appears as a significant factor in variance analysis shown in Table 2. These differences were lost after acclimation Table 2. 3.4. Stereology of lysosomes Results of the stereological analysis of lysosomes are shown in Table 4. The presence of food affected significantly the characteristics of the lysosomal system in less than 3 days and, thus, the volume density was significantly lower in starved than in fed cockles. Furthermore, the lysosomal volume density appears to increase with improved feeding condition: cockles fed Ll diet had significantly higher t-test, P , 0.005 lysosomal 3 density than starved ones but significantly lower than those fed the remaining diets. Accordingly, Table 2 shows that the interaction term ql 3 qn affects significantly lysosomal volume density. Significant modifications during acclimation have been indicated in Table 4: whereas starvation brought a slight not significant reduction of the volume density of lysosomes, feeding activity increased the volume density of lysosomes in all feeding conditions. However, the effect was dependent on food quality: whereas the increase of lysosomal density was intense and significant in cockles fed low quality diets 3 2.5 to 2 times for Ll and Lh respectively, with high qualities, the increase was moderate and statistically not significant. In consequence, the differences between cockles fed different food qualities was reduced after acclimation Table 2. Since lysosomes are the specific organelles dealing with intracellular digestion within the digestive gland, in Fig. 3 we 210 I . Ibarrola et al. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 252 2000 199 –219 Table 4 a Stereological parameters characterizing the lysosomal system from digestive cells of the digestive gland Diet VD ND S V SD 23 23 23 S 2.86 3 10 61.11 3 10 0.01060.003 5.63660.707 0.01665.01 3 10 3 23 24 23 23 S 1.65 3 10 66.58 3 10 0.01061.93 3 10 7.32860.561 0.01263.83 3 10 11 23 23 23 23 Ll 5.15 3 10 61.36 3 10 0.01262.87 3 10 4.74460.917 0.02465.54 3 10 3 23 23 23 23 Ll 0.01367.34 3 10 8.26 3 10 63.21 3 10 3.04961.426 0.03469.36 3 10 11 23 24 23 23 Lh 8.88 3 10 69.18 3 10 0.01362.94 3 10 3.69760.299 0.03363.86 3 10 3 23 23 23 23 Lh 0.01663.32 3 10 4.92 3 10 61.41 3 10 2.14660.420 0.03261.24 3 10 11 23 23 23 23 23 Hl 8.22 3 10 63.30 3 10 8.78 3 10 62.34 3 10 3.46560.646 0.02768.80 3 10 3 23 23 23 23 Hl 0.01063.44 3 10 8.07 3 10 63.68 3 10 3.07660.668 0.02965.95 3 10 11 23 23 23 23 23 Hh 7.58 3 10 62.62 3 10 7.81 3 10 61.67 3 10 3.48760.617 0.02565.63 3 10 3 23 23 23 23 Hh 0.01264.55 3 10 6.02 3 10 64.34 3 10 2.51960.865 0.02865.94 3 10 11 a VD, volume density; ND, numerical density; S V, surface to volume ratio; SD, surface density. Values are means6S.D. n 5 5. S, starved; Ll, low quality food dosed at low ration; Lh, low quality dosed at high ration; Hl, high quality food dosed at low ration; Hh, high quality food dosed at high ration. The subindex 3 and 11 are used to indicate, respectively, acute 3 days and acclimated 11 days responses. Indicates significant differences Fischer test for P 5 0.05 between short- and long-term responses. have analyzed the relationship between lysosomic parameters and ingestion rate of organic matter reported in the preceding publication. The figure shows that: a both volume and surface density of lysosomes rose to saturation with increasing organic ingestion rate, both in the acute and acclimated responses. b For a given value of organic ingestion rate, corresponding VD is higher after acclimation to the diet. c Increments in lysosomal volume density with rising ingestion rate occurred as a consequence of a strong increment of the lysosomal size see S V and in spite of reduction of the numerical density ND. 3.5. Enzyme activities in the digestive gland Dry weight, protein contents and specific enzyme activities mg of end-product per mg protein per hour of the digestive glands are shown in Table 5. Resulting total activities mg of end-product per digestive gland per hour have been plotted in Fig. 4a–d. Significant modifications after acclimation have been indicated with asterisks. Two-factor variance analysis testing for significant effects of food quality and quantity in the acute and acclimated responses are shown in Table 6. In the acute response, both quantity and quality exerted significant positive effects on the dry weight of the digestive gland Table 6. The changes in the soluble protein content were not statistically significant. Total protease and cellulase activities were significantly higher in cockles fed on high than on low food rations. The increase of protease activity was especially high in cockles fed Lh diet, due to the simultaneous increment of the dry weight of the digestive gland and the specific protease activity. Conversely, no significant changes were recorded for total amylase and laminarinase Table 6. Enzymatic acclimation to the diets could be described as a process involving a I . Ibarrola et al. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 252 2000 199 –219 211 Fig. 3. Stereological parameters of the lysosomic system of cockles starved 3 days, solid star; 11 days, asterisks and fed different diets Ll, triangles; Lh, rhombs; Hl, squares; Hh, circles for 3 days hollow symbols and 11 days solid symbols. Values are means6S.D. n 5 5. generalized increment of dry weight of the gland, especially in cockles fed concentrated rations, that brought about increased activities of cellulase, laminarinase and proteases but not amylases see the statistical significance of qn on Table 2. Food quality exerted a further differential effect: increment of cellulase and especially laminarinase activities with increasing food concentrations were more pronounced in cockles acclimated to high quality diets Hh , see Table 5. 11 3.6. Correlation between histological parameters and enzyme activities Should a given enzyme activity be produced by a particular digestive structure, the relative enrichment or impoverishment of the gland in such structure could be expected to exert modifications in the specific activity of the enzyme. Thus, with the aim to establish possible functional relationships between enzymatic and histological parame- ters we have performed simple correlation analyses between specific enzyme activities 212 I . Ibarrola et al. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 252 2000 199 –219 Table 5 Dry weight W ; mg, percentage of soluble protein p and specific enzyme activities of the digestive DG 21 21 a gland mg of end product mg prot h Diet W p A C L P DG spc spc spc spc S 15.964.6 22.161.1 1.1560.25 0.3160.13 0.3660.26 0.2360.04 3 Ll 17.962.6 23.061.8 0.8660.10 0.2760.07 0.2860.11 0.3060.08 3 Ll 20.664.1 20.661.7 0.8760.18 0.3160.13 0.1760.11 0.3760.06 11 Lh 24.166.6 21.562.2 0.8660.15 0.3560.09 0.2960.11 0.4360.02 3 Lh 35.064.9 21.860.9 0.6960.10 0.3460.08 0.2560.08 0.5160.08 11 Hl 22.864.0 21.561.9 0.8960.17 0.3160.12 0.2860.12 0.4160.09 3 Hl 26.466.1 21.662.9 0.6860.23 0.2960.12 0.3260.13 0.4260.07 11 Hh 25.763.5 21.862.2 0.7760.16 0.3360.09 0.2660.06 0.3260.04 3 Hh 35.766.0 21.861.1 0.4660.11 0.3560.09 0.3860.06 0.4760.04 11 a Values are means 6S.D. n 5 10. S, starved, S not determined; Ll, low quality food dosed at low 11 ration; Lh, low quality dosed at high ration; Hl, high quality food dosed at low ration; Hh, high quality food dosed at high ration. The subindex 3 and 11 are used to indicate, respectively, acute 3 days and acclimated 11 days responses. Indicates significant differences Fischer test for P 5 0.05 between short- and long-term responses. Fig. 4. Mean values 6S.D. of total enzyme activities of cockles starved S or fed different food quantities and qualities Ll, Lh, Hl and Hh for 3 days hollow bars and 11 days solid bars; n 5 10. The asterisks indicate significant differences between mean values from the 3rd and 11th day t-test, P , 0.005. I . Ibarrola et al. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 252 2000 199 –219 213 Table 6 Summary of ANOVA testing the effects of food quality ql and quantity qn on the dry weight, protein content and total enzyme activities of the digestive gland Source of variation df MS SS F P Acute response Dry weight ql 1 104.65 104.65 5.29 0.027 qn 1 208.39 208.39 10.53 0.002 Interaction 1 29.41 29.41 1.49 0.231 Error 36 712.74 19.80 Protein content 24 24 ql 1 3.76 3 10 3.76 3 10 0.92 0.344 24 24 qn 1 3.69 3 10 3.69 3 10 0.90 0.348 24 24 Interaction 1 8.60 3 10 8.60 3 10 2.10 0.156 24 Error 36 0.01 4.09 3 10 Total amylase ql 1 0.62 0.62 0.75 0.392 qn 1 2.16 2.16 2.61 0.116 Interaction 1 2.80 2.80 3.37 0.075 Error 33 27.36 0.83 Total cellulase ql 1 0.16 0.16 0.51 0.479 qn 1 2.64 2.64 8.18 0.007 Interaction 1 0.56 0.56 1.75 0.195 Error 33 10.64 0.32 Total laminarinase 24 24 23 ql 1 1.94 3 10 1.94 3 10 6.76 3 10 0.935 qn 1 0.67 0.67 2.34 0.136 Interaction 1 0.44 0.44 1.75 0.223 Error 33 9.47 0.28 Total protease ql 1 0.09 0.09 0.48 0.494 qn 1 1.48 1.48 7.94 0.008 Interaction 1 3.75 3.75 20.15 0.000 Error 33 6.5 0.19 Acclimated response Dry weight ql 1 103.01 103.01 3.55 0.068 qn 1 1334.56 1334.56 45.96 0.000 Interaction 1 62.03 62.03 2.13 0.153 Error 34 987.32 29.04 Protein content 24 24 ql 1 2.67 3 10 2.67 3 10 0.77 0.386 24 24 qn 1 4.53 3 10 4.53 3 10 1.30 0.261 24 24 Interaction 1 2.30 3 10 2.30 3 10 0.66 0.421 24 Error 34 0.01 3.47 3 10 Total amylase ql 1 5.44 5.44 4.89 0.034 qn 1 4.09 4.09 3.68 0.063 Interaction 1 6.97 6.97 6.26 0.017 Error 34 37.80 1.11 214 I . Ibarrola et al. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 252 2000 199 –219 Table 6. Continued Source of variation df MS SS F P Total cellulase ql 1 0.41 0.41 0.73 0.399 qn 1 13.63 13.63 24.35 0.000 Interaction 1 0.28 0.28 0.50 0.482 Error 34 19.03 0.56 Total laminarinase ql 1 10.55 10.55 20.61 0.000 qn 1 13.10 13.10 25.58 0.000 Interaction 1 0.01 0.01 0.03 0.857 Error 34 17.41 0.51 Total protease ql 1 1.17 1.17 1.84 0.184 qn 1 29.77 29.77 46.91 0.000 Interaction 1 2.65 2.65 9.17 0.049 Error 34 21.57 0.63 C , L and P from Table 5 and lysosomal volume densities VD from Table 4 as spc spc spc well as the relative abundance of cell types in the digestive gland FV , FV , from Table B D 1. Since individuals used in enzymatic and histological determinations were different, mean values have been used in the analysis. Results are presented in the form of a correlation matrix in Table 7. Specific protease activity had a high correlation index with lysosome volume density VD, while specific cellulase and laminarinase activities were correlated with the volume fraction of basophilic cells. A significant negative correlation between specific amylase and lysosomal VD was also found.

4. Discussion