Validity Criteria of a Good Test

After conducting the treatment, the researcher gave post-test to both classes. It was done in order to know the result of the experimental and control class, whether they had development or not.

3.6 Criteria of a Good Test

In this research, to prove whether the test has good quality, it must be tried out first. The test can be said having a good quality if it has a good validity, reliability, level of difficulty, and discrimination power Shohamy, 1985

1. Validity

Validity refers to the extent to which the test measure what is intended to measure. This means that it relates directly to the purpose of the test Shohamy, 1985: 74. There are four types of validity, namely face validity, content validity, construct validity and empirical validity. To measure whether the test has a good validity, the researcher used content validity and construct validity. Content validity is concerned with whether the test is sufficiently representative and comprehensive for the test. In the content validity, the materials given are suitable with the curriculum. In this case, the researcher uses the preposition of place that is supposed to be comprehended by grade VII students. To fulfill this validity, the researcher should see all the indicators of the instrument and analyze them to see whether it has represented the material that measured or not. In this research, the researcher arranged the instrument based on the material given. If the measuring instrument has represented all the ideas that connected with the material that will be measured, that measuring instrument has fulfilled the aspect of content validity. To know whether the test has a good validity, the items of the test discussed with her advisors and her classmate and the English teacher of SMPN 21 Bandar Lampung. The content of the try out test is represented in the table of specification below: Table 3. Specification of the Try Out Test No Preposition of Place classes Numbers of Items Percentage 1 The Point Itself 1., 3., 4., 6., 8., 11., 13., 14., 15., 21., 31., 33., 34., 35., 36., 38., 39. 42,5 2 Higher or Lower Point 10., 12., 16., 17., 18., 25., 32., 37. 20 3 Neighboring the Point 2., 5., 7., 9., 19., 20., 22., 23., 24., 26., 27., 28., 29., 30., 40. 37,5 Total 100 Frank, 1972: 162 Construct validity examines whether the test is actually in line with the theory, meaning whether the test is in line with the school curriculum. Preposition of place that is supposed to be comprehended by grade VII students of junior high school KTSP Kurikulum Tingkat Satuan Pendidikan 2006 will be used.

1. Reliability

Dokumen yang terkait

A COMPARATIVE STUDY BETWEEN STUDENTS’ ACHIEVEMENT IN LEARNING SIMPLE PAST TENSE TAUGHT THROUGH GROUP WORK AND TAUGHT THROUGH INDIVIDUAL STUDY

0 3 9

A COMPARATIVE STUDY BETWEEN STUDENTS’ ACHIEVEMENT IN LEARNING SIMPLE PAST TENSE TAUGHT THROUGH GROUP WORK AND TAUGHT THROUGH INDIVIDUAL STUDY

0 4 9

A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF STUDENTS’ VOCABULARY ACHIEVEMENT BETWEEN THE STUDENTS WHO ARE TAUGHT THROUGH LOGICO AND THOSE TAUGHT THROUGH TRANSLATION AT THE THIRD YEAR OF SD N 6 METRO PUSAT

0 5 8

A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF STUDENTS’ VOCABULARY ACHIEVEMENT BETWEEN THOSE WHO ARE TAUGHT THROUGH LOGICO AND THOSE TAUGHT THROUGH CROSSWORD PUZZLE AT THE SEVENTH GRADE OF SMP NEGERI 21 BANDAR LAMPUNG

5 48 74

A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF STUDENTS’ READING COMPREHENSION ACHIEVEMENT TAUGHT THROUGH SQ3R AND TAUGHT THROUGH TRANSLATION TECHNIQUE AT THE SECOND YEAR OF SMP NEGERI 8 BANDAR LAMPUNG

3 69 60

A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF READING COMPREHENSION ACHIEVEMENT BETWEEN STUDENTS TAUGHT THROUGH COLLABORATIVE STRATEGIC READING AND TAUGHT THROUGH SELF-QUESTIONING STRATEGY AT THE FIRST YEAR STUDENTS OF SMAN 8 BANDAR LAMPUNG

3 89 211

A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF STUDENTS’ READING COMPREHENSION ACHIEVEMENT BETWEEN THOSE TAUGHT THROUGH PREDICTIVE TECHNIQUE AND THOSE TAUGHT THROUGH MAKING INFERENCES TECHNIQUE AT THE SECOND GRADE OF SMAN 1 KOTAGAJAH

0 10 61

A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF STUDENTS’ READING COMPREHENSION ACHIEVEMENT BETWEEN THOSE TAUGHT THROUGH PREDICTIVE TECHNIQUE AND THOSE TAUGHT THROUGH MAKING INFERENCES TECHNIQUE AT THE SECOND GRADE OF SMAN 1 KOTAGAJAH

2 14 60

COMPARATIVE STUDY OF STUDENTS’ LISTENING ACHIEVEMENT TAUGHT THROUGH DIALOGUE VIDEO AND ANIMATION MOVIE AT SMAN 12 BANDAR LAMPUNG

0 7 63

A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF STUDENTS’ LISTENING COMPREHENSION ACHIEVEMENT TAUGHT THROUGH VIDEO AND THOSE TAUGHT THROUGH AUDIO IN SMPN 26 BANDAR LAMPUNG

1 26 59