Reliability of the Test Level of Difficulty Discrimination Power

To know the test is true reflection of the theory in reading comprehension, the researcher will examine whether the test questions actually reflected the means of reading comprehension or not.

3.6.2 Reliability of the Test

Reliability refers to the extent to which the text is consistent in its score, and gives us an indication of how accurate the test score are Hatch and Farhady, 1982: 244. To measure the coefficient of the reliability between the first and the second half, Pearson Product Moment is used, which is formulated as follows: Hatch and Farhady, 1982: 222 Where, n = number of students r = coefficient reliability between first and second half = total number of first half = total number of second half = square of = square of = total score of first half items = total score of second half items and Farhady, 1982: 246 to determine the reliability of the test as follow: rl rl Rk 1 2 Hatch and Farhady, 1982: 286 Where: Rk : the reliability of the test rl : the reliability of half test The criteria of reliability are: 0.90- 1.00 = high 0.50- 0.89 = moderate 0.0- 0.49 = low

3.6.3 Level of Difficulty

Level of difficulty of an item simply shows how easy or difficult the particular item proved in the test Heaton, 1975: 182. Level of difficulty is generally expressed as the fraction or percentage of the students who answered the item correctly. To see the level of difficulty, the writer uses the following formula: N R LD Heaton, 1975: 182 Where: LD : level of difficulty R : the number of the students who answer correctly N : the total number of the students The criteria are: 0.30 = difficult 0.30- 0.70 = average 0.70 = easy

3.6.4 Discrimination Power

The discrimination power DP is the proportion of the high group students getting the items correct minus the proportion of the low-level students who getting the items correct. To see the discrimination power, the writer uses the following formula: Heaton, 1975: 182 Where, DP = Discrimination Power U = Number of upper group who answer correctly L = Number of lower group who answer correctly N = Total number of the students. The criteria are: DP: 0.00-0.19 = Poor DP: 0.20-0.39 = Satisfactory DP: 0.40-0.69 = Good DP: 0.70-1.00 = Excellent DP: - negative= Bad items, should be omitted

3.7 Data Analysis

Dokumen yang terkait

A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF STUDENTS’ VOCABULARY ACHIEVEMENT BETWEEN THE STUDENTS WHO ARE TAUGHT THROUGH LOGICO AND THOSE TAUGHT THROUGH TRANSLATION AT THE THIRD YEAR OF SD N 6 METRO PUSAT

0 5 8

A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF STUDENTS’ VOCABULARY ACHIEVEMENT BETWEEN THOSE WHO ARE TAUGHT THROUGH LOGICO AND THOSE TAUGHT THROUGH CROSSWORD PUZZLE AT THE SEVENTH GRADE OF SMP NEGERI 21 BANDAR LAMPUNG

5 48 74

A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF STUDENTS’ READING COMPREHENSION ACHIEVEMENT BETWEEN THOSE TAUGHT THROUGH RECIPROCAL TEACHING TECHNIQUE AND THOSE TAUGHT THROUGH CONTEXTUAL TEACHING AND LEARNING AT THE SECOND GRADE OF SMP NEGERI 5 METRO

1 7 62

A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF STUDENTS’ READING COMPREHENSION ACHIEVEMENT BETWEEN THOSE TAUGHT THROUGH RECIPROCAL TEACHING TECHNIQUE AND THOSE TAUGHT THROUGH CONTEXTUAL TEACHING AND LEARNING AT THE SECOND GRADE OF SMP NEGERI 5 METRO

0 3 50

A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF STUDENTS’ SPEAKING ABILITY BETWEEN THOSE WHO ARE TAUGHT THROUGH ROLE PLAY AND THOSE THROUGH JIGSAW TECHNIQUES

1 13 64

A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF STUDENTS’ VOCABULARY ACHIEVEMENT BETWEEN THE STUDENTS’ WHO ARE TAUGHT THROUGH DIRECT METHOD AND THOSE WHO ARE TAUGHT THROUGH SILENT WAY AT THE FOURTH YEAR OF SDN 1 PISANG PENENGAHAN LAMPUNG SELATAN

4 20 53

COMPARATIVE STUDY OF STUDENTS’ READING ACHIEVEMENT BETWEEN THOSE WHO ARE TAUGHT THROUGH RETELLING STORY AND THOSE TAUGHT THROUGH TRANSLATING A FAIRY TALE AT THE FIRST GRADE OF MA MA’ARIF 4 KALIREJO LAMPUNG TENGAH

0 12 46

A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF STUDENTS’ READING COMPREHENSION ACHIEVEMENT BETWEEN THOSE TAUGHT THROUGH PREDICTIVE TECHNIQUE AND THOSE TAUGHT THROUGH MAKING INFERENCES TECHNIQUE AT THE SECOND GRADE OF SMAN 1 KOTAGAJAH

0 10 61

A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF STUDENTS’ READING COMPREHENSION ACHIEVEMENT BETWEEN THOSE TAUGHT THROUGH PREDICTIVE TECHNIQUE AND THOSE TAUGHT THROUGH MAKING INFERENCES TECHNIQUE AT THE SECOND GRADE OF SMAN 1 KOTAGAJAH

2 14 60

A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF STUDENTS’ SPEAKING ABILITY BETWEEN THOSE WHO ARE TAUGHT THROUGH STORY TELLING AND THOSE THROUGH STORY TELLING WITH SERIAL PICTURES AT THE SECOND YEAR OF SMAN 1 BANDAR LAMPUNG

1 16 53