Accuracy of the Photogrammetric Model

The eBee ’s flight resulted in 417 geotagged images. The photogrammetric data was processed with the software Pix4Dmapper. All the 417 images were processed and the achieved Ground Sampling Distance - GSD was 3.44cm. As the processing itself takes up to a couple of hours, an experiment with only 209 images was performed, meaning only the images from one flight direction. As a result, the Initial Processing took up to 9min52sec. The achieved GSD in this case was 3.46cm. No matter the reduced number of images, the GSD value was preserved. 3.3.1 Camera Calibration A really crucial step of the initial processing is the camera calibration. The calibration process optimizes the camera parameters. The software Pix4Dmapper orient the cameras using the keypoint matches. Initially the process is conducted by iterations to restore the camera geometry. The iterations start with taking two cameras only. The calculated camera parameters based on image content only are presented in Table 2 and the radial and tangential distortion in Table 1. Sensor Width [mm]: 7.40 Sensor Height [mm] 5.60 Focal Length [mm]: 5.20 Table 1. Initial camera parameters of Canon S110 RGB Sensor Width [mm]: 7.44 Sensor Height [mm] 5.58 Pixel size [µm]: 1.86 Focal Length [mm]: 5.32049 Principal Point x [mm]: 3.80836 Principal Point y [mm]: 2.77957 Table 2. Optimized values of the camera parameters For precise optimization, the initial camera parameters should be within 5 0.26mm difference of the optimized values after the initial process of the images. In the particular case, the difference between the camera parameters before and after is 0.12mm. By defining the camera parameters, we receive information regarding the radial and tangential distortion of the camera lenses. The distortion is related to the principal point. This means that in order to define the radial distortion, the image coordinates x’ P ,y’ P must be corrected by the shift of the principal point x’ ,y’ . Luhmann, 2014 The camera external parameters are defined for each image by the camera position: , , x y z T T T T  , 1 Where T x , T y and T z are the coordinates of the camera projection center in a world coordinate system. The rotation matrix R defines the camera orientation based on the angles  ,  and  : . . R Rx Ry Rz     2 Let X=X, Y, Z is a 3D point in a world coordinate system, then its position in a camera coordinate system X’=X’,Y’,Z’ is given by: T X R X T   3 The camera distortion model is defined as follows: Let the point h h X x Z y Y Z                    be homogeneous point or: 2 2 2 h h r x y   , 4 Where r is the image radius from the point x h , y h to the principal point. The distorted homogeneous point in a camera coordinate system x hd , y hd is given by: 2 4 6 2 2 1 2 3 1 2 2 4 6 2 2 1 2 3 2 1 1 2 2 1 2 2 hd h h h h hd h h h h x R r R r R r x T x y T r x y R r R r R r y T x y T r y                          , 5 The pixel coordinate x d , y d of the 3D point projection is given by: x hd hd y hd hd c x fx c y fy                      , 6 Where f is the focal length and c x , c y are the pixel coordinated of the principal point. Luhmann, 2014 Radial Distortion R1: -0.040 Radial Distortion R2: -0.012 Radial Distortion R3: 0.007 Tangential Distortion T1: 0.000 Tangential Distortion T2: 0.004 Table 3. Radial and tangential distortion of the camera lens Only 6 out of 209 images were not georeferenced Figure 7.. These are situated in the borders of the flight area. This is due to insufficient image data and overlap. The overlap is essential for the keypoints extraction and matching. Non-georeferenced images are marked in red on the left side of the flight area. The seven ground control points were marked after the initial processing with RMS error of 0.004m. The GSD Ground Sampling Distance was used for analyzing the accuracy. In regards to this, the accuracy of the GCPs is less than even one time the GSD = 3.46cm Table 3. Figure 6. Image positions on the flight strips Figure 7. Non-georeferenced images marked in red on the left side of the rectangle, indicating the flight area

3.3 Accuracy of the Photogrammetric Model

This contribution has been peer-reviewed. doi:10.5194isprsarchives-XLI-B1-999-2016 1001 Theoretically, only three ground control points are needed for the transformation between model coordinate system and geodetic system. Error accumulation in the image matching could be prevented by initiating GCPs at the ends and in the middle of the object as it is in the study case. The accuracy of the GCPs is a biased estimate of the accuracy. Basically, it shows the accuracy of marking the points themselves, not the accuracy of the model after georeferencing. That is why check points are inserted. An end and a middle point were selected for the check control. They were not taken into account for the georeferenced process and optimization. Check points indicate the accuracy of the model. Table 4 shows the accuracy of marking the ground control points. In Table 5 the real accuracy if the model is shown by the two check points. GCP Number s XYZ s X [m] s Y [m] s Z [m] GCP110001 0.0200.020 -0.002 0.004 0.001 GCP110002 0.0200.020 +0.002 0.000 0.000 GCP110005 0.0200.020 0.006 -0.004 -0.008 GCP110007 0.0200.020 -0.002 -0.006 -0.003 GCP110004 0.0200.020 -0.003 0.008 0.010 Mean [m] 0.000 0.000 0.000 Sigma [m] 0.003 0.005 0.006 RMS Error [m] 0.003 0.005 0.006 Table 4. Residuals of the ground control points Point Number s XYZ s X [m] s Y [m] s Z [m] CP110006 0.0200.020 -0.009 0.010 -0.036 CP110003 0.0200.020 -0.025 -0.014 0.020 Mean [m] 0.0200.020 -0.017 -0.002 -0.008 Sigma [m] 0.008 0.012 0.028 RMS Error [m] 0.018 0.012 0.029 Table 5. Residuals of the check points A Point Cloud Densification is the second step of the photogrammetric process and it took 34min57sec. A 3D textured mesh was generated for 15min32sec. This is an essential and compulsory step before getting to volumetric calculation. In conclusion the overall time estimated for the processing of the photogrammetric data was around 1 hour including DSM Digital Surface Model and orthomosaic creation see Figure 8. Figure 8. Orthomosaic and Digital Surface Model DSM of the quarry

3.4 GPS measurements