Material and methods Directory UMM :Data Elmu:jurnal:I:Insect Biochemistry and Molecular Biology:Vol30.Issue5.2000:

396 L. Prapanthadara et al. Insect Biochemistry and Molecular Biology 30 2000 395–403 show remarkable similarities in their primary sequences within their respective classes. Despite only minor sequence differences, the functional properties of iso- forms within a class are also distinct. The heterogeneity of substrate specificity between isoforms in any given class has significant physiologic and pathophysiologic importance in detoxication of endogenous and exogen- ous compounds for review see Beckett and Hayes, 1993. Heavy use of chemicals for pest control has increased the rate of insect resistance to insecticides. It has lead to a public health problem in many countries, especially for tropical insect borne diseases. The glutathione mediated reaction catalyzed by glutathione S-transferase is one of the important mechanisms that allow insects to survive in a contaminated environment. Some examples of insecticides that have been recognized as substrates for glutathione conjugation are DDT 1,1,1-trichloro- 2,2-bis[p-chlorophenyl]ethane, diazinon, fenitrothion and parathion Lamoureux and Rusness, 1989. Several insecticide-resistant strains of housefly have been reported to have elevated GST activity in crude extracts Motoyama and Dauterman, 1975; Clark and Dauter- man, 1982; Clark et al., 1986. The DDT-resistant An. gambiae has also been shown to have GST as a resist- ance mechanism Hemingway et al., 1985. Many preliminary studies of insect GSTs reveal mul- tiple forms exist. Those include housefly Clark et al., 1984; Fournier et al., 1992, grass grub Clark et al., 1985 and Drosophila Cochrane et al., 1987; Toung et al., 1990. There are at least three GST isoenzymes present in mosquitoes, three in Aedes aegypti Grant and Matsumura, 1989; Grant et al., 1991 and seven in An. gambiae Prapanthadara et al., 1993. Different forms of GST exhibited varying specificities for the insecticides studied. In a DDT-resistant strain compared with a sus- ceptible strain of the African mosquito An. gambiae, there was an increased synthesis of different isoenzymes of GSTs that possessed a greater DDT dehydrochlorin- ase activity Prapanthadara et al. 1993, 1995. Observed differences in the GSTs from the two strains demon- strated that expression of the enzymes is influenced by environmental factors such that qualitatively distinct forms can be selected at the genetic level and differen- tially expressed. The GSTs from An. gambiae were fractionated into seven isoenzymes using sequential column chromato- graphy Prapanthadara et al., 1993. These seven enzymes were divided into two groups according to elu- tion properties shown on a S-hexylglutathione affinity column. A comparison study in DDT-resistant and sus- ceptible strains of An. gambiae demonstrated that there was an eight-fold increase in DDT-dehydrochlorinase activity in the resistant insects as a result of increased activity in every isoenzyme. Kinetic characterization of the isolated GST isoenzymes was restricted for An. gam- biae due to unsuccessful purification. Using An. dirus B as a model anopheline, less diversity was shown and GST-4a was purified to homogeneity Prapanthadara et al., 1996. In this report we have continued to isolate GST isoenzymes from An. dirus B and have partially characterized them with various substrates and insecti- cides. One isoenzyme from the peak four GSTs, GST- 4c, has been purified to homogeneity. This isoenzyme possesses the highest specific activity for DDT in this species.

2. Material and methods

2.1. Chemicals Trizma base, dithiothreitol DTT, 1-chloro-2,4- dinitrobenzene CDNB, ethacrynic acid, cumene hydro- peroxide, bromosulfophthalein, 4-nitropyridine-N-oxide, 1,2-epoxy-3-p-nitrophenoxypropane, nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate reduced form NADPH, glutathione reductase, glutathione GSH, S- hexylglutathione, and S-hexylglutathione agarose were from Sigma Chemical Co. St Louis, MO, USA. 1,2- dichloro-4-nitrobenzene DCNB, trans -4-phenyl-3- buten-2-one, and p -nitrophenethyl bromide were obtained from Aldrich Chemical Co. Milwaukee, WI, USA. Q-Sepharose and phenyl Sepharose were pur- chased from Pharmacia LKB Uppsala, Sweden. Hydroxylapatite and protein assay reagent were pur- chased from Bio-Rad Richmond, CA. High purity stan- dard p,p-DDT 98.5, p,p-DDE 1,1,1-trichloro-2,2-[p- chlorophenyl]ethylene 99, dicofol and other insecti- cides were purchased from British Greyhound Birkenhead, Merseyside, UK. 2.2. Mosquitoes An established laboratory colony of mosquito Anoph- eles dirus species B at the Department of Parasitology, Faculty of Medicine, Chiangmai University was used. Species B had been confirmed by both morphological and chromosomal properties. The starting material for the purification protocol was fourth instar. These were snap-frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at 270 ° C until used. 2.3. Purification of An. dirus glutathione S- transferases Unless otherwise stated, all extractions and procedures in the purification scheme were performed at 4 ° C and all buffers contained 10 mM DTT. The larvae 30 g were homogenized in 150 ml of 25 mM Tris–HCl, pH 7.4 buffer A using a glass homogenizer with a motor- driven Teflon pestle. The homogenate was centrifuged 397 L. Prapanthadara et al. Insect Biochemistry and Molecular Biology 30 2000 395–403 at 10,000 g for 20 min and the resultant supernatant was filtered through Whatman No. 1 filter paper using Swin- nex Disc Filter Holders Millipore to remove floating lipids. The supernatant was applied to a Q-Sepharose column 60 ml, 4.4 × 4 cm, equilibrated with buffer A. The column was washed with five bed volumes of this buffer and a linear gradient of 150 ml of buffer A con- taining 0–0.30 M NaCl was applied. GST activity detected in the wash-through fraction was designated peak 1 and GST activity eluted from this column was designated peak 2. Peak 2 was applied directly to a S-hexylglutathione agarose column 25 ml, 2.2 × 6.6 cm equilibrated with buffer A. The column was washed with buffer A con- taining 0.2 M NaCl until no protein appeared in the elu- ate. Bound proteins were eluted with 100 ml of 5 mM S- hexylglutathione in washing buffer. Two peaks of GST activity were recovered from this column, designated peak 3 unbound fraction and peak 4 bound fraction. Peak 3 and peak 4 from the S-hexylglutathione col- umn were concentrated and further purified separately, using an hydroxylapatite column at room temperature 26 ° C. Peak 3 was applied to a 20 ml 2.2 × 5.3 cm column whereas a 10 ml column was used for peak 4. Starting buffer was 10 mM phosphate buffer pH 6.5 buffer B containing 0.2 M NaCl. After washing with buffer B until no protein was detected in the eluate, the bound proteins were eluted, first with four column vol- umes of buffer B containing no NaCl, second with 10 column volumes of a linear gradient of 10–200 mM phosphate buffer pH 6.5. In total, five GST activity peaks were resolved, with GST 4a, GST 4b and 4c being from peak 4 and GST 5 as well as GST 6 originating from peak 3. GST 4a was further purified as previously described Prapanthadara et al., 1996. GST 5 and GST 6 from the hydroxylapatite column were diluted with 2 volumes of 0.3 M phosphate buffer, pH 6.5, containing 2 M NaCl. The dilution buffer was used previously to equilibrate a phenyl Sepharose column 10 ml; 1.6 × 4 cm. Diluted enzyme was applied to the phenyl Sepharose column at room temperature and the column was washed with three bed volumes of equilibration buffer. Bound proteins were step eluted with 30 ml 0.3 M sodium phosphate buffer pH 6.5, then a 60 ml gradient of 0.3–0.01 M sodium phosphate buffer pH 6.5, followed by 40 ml 25 mM Tris–HCl buffer pH 7.4 containing 30 ethylene glycol. The GST activity of peak 5 was fractionated from other contaminating proteins and eluted out at the last step. Step gradient elution of GST-6 was the same as for GST-5 but the GST activity was eluted in the first step. SDS–PAGE to detect homogeneity of the isolated iso- enzymes was performed with standard proteins M r 14.2–66 kD using a 15 resolving gel and a 4.5 stacking gel, Laemmli, 1970. Coomassie Blue R250 was used to stain for protein. 2.4. Determination of enzyme activity The methods for determination of glutathione S-trans- ferase activity with CDNB as well as DCNB were modi- fied as described below Habig et al., 1974. Activity with 1 mM CDNB and 10 mM GSH was measured at 340 nm in 0.1 M phosphate buffer, pH 6.5, at 22 ° C. This was the standard assay for GST activity during the purification procedure. A unit of GST activity is defined as µ mole CDNB-GSH conjugated product formation per minute. The activity with DCNB was measured at 340 nm in the presence of 10 mM GSH and 1 mM DCNB. With all other substrates, the enzyme activity was meas- ured as previously described Habig et al., 1974. Gluta- thione peroxidase activity with cumene hydroperoxide as substrate was determined Wendel, 1981. Stock sol- utions of GSH were prepared in buffer. The concen- tration of ethanol in the assays was kept constant at 5 vv. These ethanol concentrations did not affect the GST activity. Protein was assayed by the method of Bradford Bradford, 1976 using the Bio-Rad protein reagent with bovine serum albumin as the standard protein. 2.5. Determination of DDT-dehydrochlorinase activity DDT-dehydrochlorinase or DDTase activity is the GST catalyzed DDT dehydrochlorination reaction to yield the product DDE. This GST catalyzed dehydroch- lorination requires the presence of reduced glutathione. The method to determine DDTase activity has been described previously Prapanthadara et al., 1996. 2.6. Inhibition study An inhibition study with various GST substrates was performed to examine interaction with the enzymes using the standard assay conditions 10 mM GSH and 1 mM CDNB in the absence and presence of inhibitors. Inhibitor concentrations were fixed to be the same as when the compounds are used as substrates. If it was necessary to solubilize the compounds, the final concen- tration of ethanol used was kept constant at 5 in the assay. Determination of IC 50 was performed for GST- 4c with Cibacron Blue 3GA, bromosulfophthalein and ethacrynic acid by varying the inhibitor concentrations. The IC 50 were calculated by producing a competitive binding curve using GraphPad PRISM Version 2.01 software. 2.7. Kinetic studies The initial rate of the enzymatic reaction was meas- ured at 0.5–10 mM GSH with CDNB concentration 398 L. Prapanthadara et al. Insect Biochemistry and Molecular Biology 30 2000 395–403 varied from 0.025–2 mM. The K m and V were determ- ined by non-linear regression analysis Leatherbarrow, 1992.

3. Results