Theoretical Assumption LITERATURE REVIEW

✂ ✄ process activity. The researcher acted as non-participant, she just observed the situation, observed the problem occurs, and all activities of process teaching learning between teacher and student in classroom interaction. What the researcher hoped, then, by administering this procedure, information about the learners’ activities during the lesson could be gathered specifically to know the process and the procedure of classroom interaction. 2. Recording Students’ performance in the conversation session was recorded by video recorded. This was done to get the data more valid, after that the video of students’ presentation performance was transcribed. 3. Transcribing After recording, the researcher made the transcription. Everything that the students had said and done in the conversation should be transcribed. It was aimed to get more valid data about the activity done by the participants. It was also needed to help the researcher in analyzing the data coming from the activity. 4. Coding The next step was coding, which is categorizing the finding of Flander Interaction Analysis Categories System FIACS Technique as follows: ☎ ✆ Table 3.4.1. Coding of FIACS No. Aspects of Classroom Interaction Code 1. 2. Teacher Talk Deals with feelings Praises or encourages Jokes Uses ideas of students Repeats student response Asks questions : -Gives information -Corrects without rejection -Gives directions -Criticizes student behavior -Criticizes student response Student Talk Student response specific Student response open ended, student initiated Silence Silence audio visual Confusion work oriented DF PE J UI RSR GI CWR GD CSB CSR SRS SRO S SAV CWO 5. Analyzing After coding, the researcher counted numbers and percentages of teacher talk and student talk. Tichapondwa 2008 argues that Flanders’ Interaction Analysis is for identifying, classifying, and observing classroom verbal interaction. It means that Flanders’ interaction Analysis help the researcher to identify classroom interaction during teaching and learning process in classifying the interaction into the teacher talk, students talk, and silence.

3.5. Procedure

Steps to be conducted in this research procedure are as follows: 1. Formulating the research question and determining the research focus.

Dokumen yang terkait

AN ANALYSIS OF CLASSROOM INTERACTION IN ENGLISH CLASS AT THE SEVENTH GRADE STUDENTS IN SMPN 4 BANDAR LAMPUNG

2 18 58

AN ANALYSIS OF CLASSROOM INTERACTION USING SINCLAIR AND COULTHARD INITIATION-RESPONSE-FEEDBACK (IRF) MODEL IN ENGLISH SPEAKING CLASS AT CLASS XI SCIENCE 8 OF SMAN 2 BANDAR LAMPUNG

2 25 52

AN ANALYSIS OF CLASSROOM INTERACTION USING SINCLAIR AND COULTHARD INITIATION-RESPONSE-FEEDBACK (IRF) MODEL IN ENGLISH SPEAKING CLASS AT CLASS XI SCIENCE 8 OF SMAN 2 BANDAR LAMPUNG

4 23 46

AN ANALYSIS OF STUDENTS’ READING COMPREHENSION ACHIEVEMENT BY USING SCANNING AND SKIMMING TECHNIQUES FOR INTROVERT AND EXTROVERT STUDENTS AT SMPN 29 BANDAR LAMPUNG

3 44 65

AN ANALYSIS OF CLASSROOM INTERACTION AT THE SECOND YEAR OF SMP 17 GEDONGTATAAN

2 21 77

CLASSROOM INTERACTION IN ENGLISH LESSON THROUGH FLANDER’S INTERACTION ANALYSIS CATEGORIES SYSTEM (FIACS) AT THE ELEVENTH GRADE OF MANDIRI VOCATIONAL SCHOOL.

3 11 21

CLASSROOM INTERACTION IN ENGLISH LESSON BASED ON FLANDER’S INTERACTION ANALYSIS CATEGORIES (FIAC).

0 4 21

A study of interaction in Teaching English To Young Learner (TEYL) classroom using flanders` interaction analysis system.

2 6 246

AN ANALYSIS OF CLASSROOM INTERACTION BY USING FLANDER INTERACTION ANALYSIS CATEGORIES SYSTEM (FIACS) TECHNIQUE AT SMPN 13 KOTA BENGKULU IN 2013/ 2014 ACADEMIC YEAR - UNIB Scholar Repository

1 1 63

AN INITIATION – RESPONSE – FEEDBACK ANALYSIS OF CLASSROOM INTERACTION BETWEEN TEACHERS AND STUDENTS AT AN EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTION IN SEMARANG

0 0 12