In this research, H
1
is accepted if p and the researcher used level of significant 0.05. From the result of normality test see Appendix 14, it can be determined
that sig. α 0.24 0.05 in pretest and sig. α 0.24 0.05 in postest. It proved
that H was accepted and the data were normally distributed.
2. Random Test
Random test was used to find out the data of experimental class was random or not. The researcher had used SPSS program to see the result of random test. The
hypotheses for random test are as follow: = The data is not random
= The data is random The data can be said random if the significant Sig. 2-tailed is greater than
0,05.The result of the random test see appendix13 illustrates that the significant two tails of pre-test is 0.17. It means that the data from the experimental classare
random since Sign α 0.17 0.05 . Meanwhile, the analysis of random test of post-test is .591 . It can be said that the data are random since .591 0.05 or the
significance two tails is greater than 0.05. Last, it can be concluded that the data of pre-test and post-test in experimental class are taken from the population at
random.
3.9. Hypothesis Testing
The hypothesis was statistically analyzed using Repeated Measures T-test that was used to drawconclusion in significant level of 0.05 P0.05 with SPSS
version 17. The hypotheses are as follow:
H :
There is no increase in some reading skills after they are taught by using Video-Jigsawintegrated technique.
p α
H
1
: There is an increase in some reading skills after they are taught by
using Video-Jigsawintegrated technique .p α.
Besides, the observation conducted in the experimental group was analyzed its qualitative data to find out the implementation of the technique in learning reading
comprehension. In this study, description analysis was used based on the observation in the teaching learning process adapted from Frank Serafini in 2010.
