Lampiran 1 Data Pasien No
Lampiran 1 Data Pasien No
Nama : Umur : Alamat : MR : Paritas : Diagnosa : Hasil Histopatologi : Jenis Tindakan : Lama Operasi : Komplikasi Operasi : Intraoperative o o Saluran pencernaan Saluran kemih o o Trauma Vesica urinaria o Trauma ureter Perdarahan
Post operative o o Demam o Wound Dehiscense o Inkontinensia urine Vesico-Vaginal fistel Lama Rawatan :
Crosstabs Case Processing Summary
Cases Valid Missing Total
N Percent N Percent N Percent Jenis Histerektomi * 152 100.0% .0% 152 100.0%
Kelompok Umur
Jenis Histerektomi * Kelompok Umur Crosstabulation
Kelompok Umur 20-40 41-50 >50 Total
Jenis Abdominal Count
32
73 30 135 Histerektomi Histerektomi
% within Jenis 23.7% 54.1% 22.2% 100.0% Histerektomi
Vaginal Count
1
4
12
17 Histerektomi % within Jenis 5.9% 23.5% 70.6% 100.0%
Histerektomi Total Count
33
77 42 152 % within Jenis 21.7% 50.7% 27.6% 100.0%
Histerektomi
Chi-Square Tests
Asymp. Sig. (2- Value df sided)
a
Pearson Chi-Square 17.772 2 .000 Likelihood Ratio 15.841 2 .000
Linear-by-Linear Association 13.412 1 .000 N of Valid Cases 152
a. 2 cells (33,3%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 3,69.
Two-Sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov Tes Frequencies
28
Histerektomi 18.4% 9.9% 71.7% 100.0%
28 15 109 152 % within Jenis
Total Count
Histerektomi .0% 11.8% 88.2% 100.0%
17 % within Jenis
15
2
Count
Vaginal Histerektomi
Histerektomi 20.7% 9.6% 69.6% 100.0%
13 94 135 % within Jenis
Jenis Histerektomi N Kelompok Umur Abdominal Histerektomi 135
Vaginal Histerektomi
Abdominal Histerektomi
Jenis Histerektomi
Kelompok Paritas Total Nullipara Primipara Multipara
Jenis Histerektomi * Kelompok Paritas Crosstabulation
N Percent N Percent N Percent Jenis Histerektomi * Kelompok Paritas 152 100.0% .0% 152 100.0%
Case Processing Summary Cases Valid Missing Total
a. Grouping Variable: Jenis Histerektomi
Kolmogorov-Smirnov Z 1.879 Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed) .002
Positive .484 Negative .000
Kelompok Umur Most Extreme Differences Absolute .484
Test Statistics a
17 Total 152
Count
Chi-Square Tests
Asymp. Sig. (2- Value df sided)
a
Pearson Chi-Square 4.325 2 .115 Likelihood Ratio 7.393 2 .025
Linear-by-Linear Association 3.761 1 .052 N of Valid Cases 152
a. 2 cells (33,3%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 1,68.
Two-Sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test
Frequencies
Jenis Histerektomi N Kelompok Paritas Abdominal Histerektomi 135
Vaginal Histerektomi
17 Total 152
a
Test Statistics
Kelompok Paritas Most Extreme Differences Absolute .207
Positive .207 Negative .000
Kolmogorov-Smirnov Z .806 Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed) .535
a. Grouping Variable: Jenis Histerektomi
Case Processing Summary
Cases Valid Missing Total
N Percent N Percent N Percent Jenis Histerektomi * Indikasi 152 100.0% .0% 152 100.0%
Tindakan Operasi
Jenis Histerektomi * Indikasi Tindakan Operasi Crosstabulation
Jenis Histerekto mi
Linear-by-Linear Association 16.310 1 .000 N of Valid Cases 152
3 .000 Likelihood Ratio 82.316 3 .000
a
Pearson Chi-Square 124.117
Value df Asymp. Sig. (2- sided)
Chi-Square Tests
81.6% 11.8% 2.6% 3.9% 100.0 %
Jenis Histerekto mi
4 6 152 % within
18
Total Count 124
5.9% 94.1% .0% .0% 100.0 %
17 % within
Indikasi Tindakan Operasi Total
16
1
Count
Vaginal Histerekto mi
91.1% 1.5% 3.0% 4.4% 100.0 %
Jenis Histerekto mi
4 6 135 % within
2
Histerekto mi Count 123
Histerekto mi Abdominal
Adenomiosi s Jenis
Proplapsu s Uteri Hiperplasia Endometriu m
Miom a Uteri
a. 4 cells (50,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is ,45.
Two-Sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test Frequencies
Count
Histerektomi 21.7% 50.7% 27.6% 100.0%
77 42 152 % within Tehnik
33
Total Count
Histerektomi 15.8% 68.4% 15.8% 100.0%
19 % within Tehnik
3
13
3
Count
Subtotal Histerektomi
Histerektomi 22.6% 48.1% 29.3% 100.0%
64 39 133 % within Tehnik
30
Jenis Histerektomi N Indikasi Tindakan Operasi Abdominal Histerektomi 135
Vaginal Histerektomi
Tehnik Histerektomi
Kelompok Umur Total 20-40 41-50 >50
Tehnik Histerektomi * Kelompok Umur Crosstabulation
Kelompok Umur 152 100.0% .0% 152 100.0%
N Percent N Percent N Percent Tehnik Histerektomi *
Cases Valid Missing Total
Case Processing Summary
a. Grouping Variable: Jenis Histerektomi
Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed) .000
Negative -.074 Kolmogorov-Smirnov Z 3.312
Most Extreme Differences Absolute .852 Positive .852
Indikasi Tindakan Operasi
Test Statistics a
17 Total 152
Total Histerektomi
Chi-Square Tests
Asymp. Sig. (2- Value df sided)
a
Pearson Chi-Square 2.805 2 .246 Likelihood Ratio 2.897 2 .235
Linear-by-Linear Association .154 1 .694 N of Valid Cases 152
Two-Sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test Frequencies
Tehnik Histerektomi N Kelompok Umur Total Histerektomi 133
Subtotal Histerektomi
19 Total 152
a Test Statistics
Kelompok Umur Most Extreme Differences Absolute .135
Positive .068 Negative -.135
Kolmogorov-Smirnov Z .552 Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed) .921
a. Grouping Variable: Tehnik Histerektomi
Crosstabs Case Processing Summary
Cases Valid Missing Total
N Percent N Percent N Percent Tehnik Histerektomi * 152 100.0% .0% 152 100.0%
Kelompok Paritas
Tehnik Histerektomi * Kelompok Paritas Crosstabulation
28 15 109 152 % within Tehnik
19 Total 152
Subtotal Histerektomi
Tehnik Histerektomi N Kelompok Paritas Total Histerektomi 133
a. 2 cells (33,3%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 1,88.
Linear-by-Linear Association 2.542 1 .111 N of Valid Cases 152
2 .041 Likelihood Ratio 7.465 2 .024
a
Pearson Chi-Square 6.364
Value df Asymp. Sig. (2- sided)
Chi-Square Tests
Histerektomi 18.4% 9.9% 71.7% 100.0%
Total Count
Kelompok Paritas Total Nullipara Primipara Multipara
Histerektomi 36.8% .0% 63.2% 100.0%
19 % within Tehnik
12
7
Count
Subtotal Histerektomi
Histerektomi 15.8% 11.3% 72.9% 100.0%
15 97 133 % within Tehnik
21
Count
Total Histerektomi
Tehnik Histerektomi
Two-Sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test Frequencies
a Test Statistics
Kelompok Paritas Most Extreme Differences Absolute .211
Positive .000 Negative -.211
Kolmogorov-Smirnov Z .858 Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed) .453
a. Grouping Variable: Tehnik Histerektomi
Case Processing Summary
Cases Valid Missing Total
N Percent N Percent N Percent Tehnik Histerektomi * 152 100.0% .0% 152 100.0%
Indikasi Tindakan Operasi
Tehnik Histerektomi * Indikasi Tindakan Operasi Crosstabulation
Indikasi Tindakan Operasi Hiperplasia
Mioma Proplapsu Endometriu Adenomiosi Uteri s Uteri m s Total
Tehnik Total Count 105
18
4 6 133 Histerekto Histerekto
% within 78.9% 13.5% 3.0% 4.5% 100.0 mi mi Tehnik
% Histerekto mi
Subtotal Count
19
19 Histerekto % within 100.0 .0% .0% .0% 100.0 mi
Tehnik % % Histerekto mi
Total Count 124
18
4 6 152 % within 81.6% 11.8% 2.6% 3.9% 100.0
Tehnik %
Histerekto mi
Chi-Square Tests
Asymp. Sig. (2- Value df sided)
a
Pearson Chi-Square 4.903 3 .179 Likelihood Ratio 8.329 3 .040
Linear-by-Linear Association 3.651 1 .056 N of Valid Cases 152
a. 4 cells (50,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is ,50.
Two-Sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test Frequencies
Tehnik Histerektomi N Kelompok Paritas Total Histerektomi 133
Subtotal Histerektomi
19 Total 152
a Test Statistics
Kelompok Paritas Most Extreme Differences Absolute .211
Positive .000 Negative -.211
Kolmogorov-Smirnov Z .858 Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed) .453
a. Grouping Variable: Tehnik Histerektomi
Crosstabs Case Processing Summary
Cases Valid Missing Total
N Percent N Percent N Percent Jenis Histerektomi * 152 100.0% .0% 152 100.0%
Komplikasi Intra Operasi
Jenis Histerektomi * Komplikasi Intra Operasi Crosstabulation
Komplikasi Intra Operasi Trauma Trauma
Perdarah TAK k u Total Jenis Abdominal Count 23 110
1 1 135 Histerektomi Histerektomi
% within Jenis 17.0% 81.5% .7% .7% 100.0% Histerektomi
Vaginal Count
17
17 Histerektomi % within Jenis .0% 100.0% .0% .0% 100.0%
Histerektomi Total Count 23 127
1 1 152 % within Jenis 15.1% 83.6% .7% .7% 100.0%
Histerektomi
Crosstabs Case Processing Summary
Cases Valid Missing Total
N Percent N Percent N Percent Jenis Histerektomi * 152 100.0% .0% 152 100.0%
Komplikasi Pasca Operasi
Jenis Histerektomi * Komplikasi Pasca Operasi Crosstabulation
Komplikasi Pasca Operasi wound Retensi TAK de Total
Jenis Abdominal Count 133 2 135 Histerektomi Histerektomi
% within Jenis .0% 98.5% 1.5% 100.0% Histerektomi
Vaginal Count
1
16
17 Histerektomi % within Jenis 5.9% 94.1% .0% 100.0%
Histerektomi Total Count 1 149 2 152
% within Jenis .7% 98.0% 1.3% 100.0% Histerektomi
Crosstabs Case Processing Summary
Cases Valid Missing Total
N Percent N Percent N Percent Tehnik Histerektomi * 152 100.0% .0% 152 100.0%
Komplikasi Intra Operasi
Tehnik Histerektomi * Komplikasi Intra Operasi Crosstabulation
Komplikasi Intra Operasi Trauma Trauma
Perdarah TAK k u Total Tehnik Total Count 19 112
1 1 133 Histerektomi Histerektomi
% within Tehnik 14.3% 84.2% .8% .8% 100.0% Histerektomi
Subtotal Count
4
15
19 Histerektomi % within Tehnik 21.1% 78.9% .0% .0% 100.0%
Histerektomi Total Count 23 127
1 1 152 % within Tehnik 15.1% 83.6% .7% .7% 100.0%
Histerektomi
Crosstabs Case Processing Summary
Cases Valid Missing Total
N Percent N Percent N Percent Tehnik Histerektomi * 152 100.0% .0% 152 100.0%
Komplikasi Pasca Operasi
Tehnik Histerektomi * Komplikasi Pasca Operasi Crosstabulation
Komplikasi Pasca Operasi wound Retensi TAK de Total
Tehnik Total Count 1 130 2 133 Histerektomi Histerektomi
% within Tehnik .8% 97.7% 1.5% 100.0% Histerektomi
Subtotal Count
19
19 Histerektomi % within Tehnik .0% 100.0% .0% 100.0%
Histerektomi Total Count 1 149 2 152
% within Tehnik .7% 98.0% 1.3% 100.0% Histerektomi
Crosstabs Case Processing Summary
Cases Valid Missing Total
N Percent N Percent N Percent Indikasi Tindakan Operasi 152 100.0% .0% 152 100.0%
- Komplikasi Intra Operasi
Indikasi Tindakan Operasi * Komplikasi Intra Operasi Crosstabulation
Komplikasi Intra Operasi Trauma Trauma
Perdarah TAK k u Total Indikasi Mioma Uteri Count 22 100
1 1 124 Tindakan
% within 17.7% 80.6% .8% .8% 100.0% Operasi
Indikasi Tindakan
Operasi Proplapsus Count
18
18 Uteri % within Indikasi
Tindakan Operasi
Indikasi Tindakan
N Percent N Percent N Percent Indikasi Tindakan Operasi *
Cases Valid Missing Total
Crosstabs
Case Processing Summary
Operasi 15.1% 83.6% .7% .7% 100.0%
Indikasi Tindakan
1 1 152 % within
Total Count 23 127
Operasi 16.7% 83.3% .0% .0% 100.0%
6 % within
.0% 100.0% .0% .0% 100.0% Hiperplasia
5
1
Adenomiosis Count
Operasi .0% 100.0% .0% .0% 100.0%
Indikasi Tindakan
4 % within
4
Endometrium Count
Komplikasi Pasca Operasi 152 100.0% .0% 152 100.0%
Indikasi Tindakan Operasi * Komplikasi Pasca Operasi Crosstabulation
4 % within Indikasi
Jumlah Perdarahan Jenis Histerektomi Mean N Std. Deviation Abdominal Histerektomi 1038.96 135 521.609 Vaginal Histerektomi 292.65 17 144.353 Total 955.49 152 547.126
Report
N Percent N Percent N Percent Jumlah Perdarahan * Jenis Histerektomi 152 100.0% .0% 152 100.0%
Cases Included Excluded Total
Tindakan Operasi .7% 98.0% 1.3% 100.0%
Total Count 1 149 2 152 % within Indikasi
Tindakan Operasi .0% 100.0% .0% 100.0%
6 % within Indikasi
6
Adenomiosis Count
Tindakan Operasi .0% 100.0% .0% 100.0%
4
Komplikasi Pasca Operasi
Count
Hiperplasia Endometrium
Tindakan Operasi 5.6% 94.4% .0% 100.0%
18 % within Indikasi
17
1
Proplapsus Uteri Count
Tindakan Operasi .0% 98.4% 1.6% 100.0%
Mioma Uteri Count 122 2 124 % within Indikasi
Indikasi Tindakan Operasi
Total Retensi TAK wound de
Means Case Processing Summary
ANOVA Table
Sum of Mean Squares df Square F Sig. Jumlah Between (Combined) 8409777.296 1 8409777.296 34.287 .000 Perdarahan * Groups Jenis
Within Groups 3.679E7 150 245277.405 Histerektomi
Total 4.520E7 151
Means Case Processing Summary
Cases Included Excluded Total
N Percent N Percent N Percent Jumlah Perdarahan * 152 100.0% .0% 152 100.0% Tehnik Histerektomi
Report
Jumlah Perdarahan Tehnik Histerektomi Mean N Std. Deviation Total Histerektomi 951.39 133 556.934 Subtotal Histerektomi 984.21 19 485.356 Total 955.49 152 547.126
ANOVA Table
Sum of Mean Squares df Square F Sig. Jumlah Between (Combined) 17907.166 1 17907.166 .059 .808 Perdarahan * Groups Tehnik
Within Groups 4.518E7 150 301223.206 Histerektomi
Total 4.520E7 151
Means
Case Processing Summary
Cases Included Excluded Total
N Percent N Percent N Percent Lama Rawatan (Hari) * Jenis
Histerektomi 152 100,0% 0,0% 152 100,0%
Report
Lama Rawatan (Hari) Jenis Histerektomi Mean N Std. Deviation
Abdominal Histerektomi 5,24 135 1,379 Vaginal Histerektomi 5,65 17 ,862
Total 5,29 152 1,335
ANOVA Table
Sum of Squares df
Mean Square F Sig.
Lama Rawatan (Hari) * Jenis
Histerektomi Between
Groups (Combined) 2,447 1 2,447 1,376 ,243
Within Groups 266,816 150 1,779 Total 269,263 151
Means Case Processing Summary
Cases Included Excluded Total
N Percent N Percent N Percent Lama Rawatan (Hari) * 152 100,0% 0,0% 152 100,0%
Tehnik Histerektomi
Report
Lama Rawatan (Hari) Tehnik Histerektomi Mean N Std. Deviation
Total Histerektomi 5,29 133 1,401 Subtotal Histerektomi 5,32 19 ,749
Total 5,29 152 1,335
ANOVA Table
Sum of Mean df F Sig. Squares Square
Between (Combined) ,015 1 ,015 ,008 ,927
Groups Lama Rawatan
(Hari) * Tehnik Within Groups 269,248 150 1,795
Histerektomi Total 269,263 151