The Influence of Job Charecteristics on Job Satisfaction, Organizational Commitment and Managerial Performance

xwvutsrqponmlkjihgfedcbaZYXWVUTSRQPONMLKJIHG
m r
1 TY nil
t nd Mall,)£{'1 Idl PHial mat
Indi DjastutiGFEDCBA

\ )"'"11 z.t

j.,P

1 '

T H E IN F L U E N C E

O F JO B C H A R A C T E R IS T IC S

O N JO B S A T IS F A C T IO N , O R G A N IZ A T IO N A L
C O M M IT M E N T

AND


M A N A G E R IA L

PERFORM ANCE
A S tu d y o n C o n s tr u c tio n

C o m p a n ie s

in C e n tr a l J a v a

In d i D ja stu ti
Diponegoro University, Semarang
indidjastuti@yahoo,co.idZYXWVUTSRQPONMLKJIHGFEDCBA

of

T h e o b je c tiv e
S a tis fa c tio n ,

th is


re s e a rc h

to

is

a n d O r g a n iz a tio n a l

a n a ly z e

C o m m itm e n t

p ro p o s e d

in th is s tu d y

e m p lo y e e .

2) T h e in flu e n c e ofjo b s a tis fa c tio n


of jo b

3 ) T h e in flu e n c e

of jo b

th e in flu e n c e
s a tis fa c tio n

c h a r a c te r is tic s

of

a r e a c c e p te d .

m a n a g e r ia l

A u to n o m y

ta s k


to

W h ile , te a m

w o r k , in itia tiv e

m a n a g e r ia l

e m p lo y e e

a s in te r v e n in g
m a n a g e r ia l
v a r ia b le

v a r ia b le
e m p lo y e e

is g r e a te r


to

T u ju a n

d ia ju k a n

enhance

u n tu k

o r g a n is a s i
:

2) P e n g a r u h

m a n a je r ia l,

3) P e n g a r u h k a r a k te r is tik p e k e r ja a n

k e r ja

k in e r ja

k a r a k te r is tik

te r h a d a p

k in e r ja

k a ry a w a n

s e b a g a i v a r ia b e l
d a n v a r ia b e l

v a r ia b e l

itu , d a la m

ra n g k a

in te r v e n in g


I

jo b

m a n a je r ia l.

k in e r ja
a fe k tif

m e n g u ji

k in e r ja

h y p o th e s e s

c o m m itm e n t

to jo b


s a tis fa c tio n

to

v a r ia b le .

th e p e r fo r m a n c e

c o m m itm e n t

c h a r a c te r is tic s

v a r ia b le

v a r ia b le

o r g a n iz a tio n a l

and


c o m m itm e n t

e m p lo y e e

dan,

m a n a je r ia l.

p e r fo r m a n c e .

to

b u ild s tr o n g e r

k a ry a w a n

jo b

o r g a n is a s i


a n ta r a

v a r ia b e l
k in e r ja

m a n a je r ia l,

v a r ia b e l

yang
k e r ja

o r g a n is a s i

k a ry a w a n

k a ry a w a n

m a n a je r ia l,
kepuasan

te r h a d a p

k o m itm e n

o r g a n is a s i

k a r a k te r is tik

p e k e r ja a n

k o m itm e n

k a ry a w a n

h ip o te s is

o r g a n is a s i

v a r ia b e l

p e k e r ja a n ,

kepuasan

5) p e n g a r u h

k o m itm e n

bahwa

enam

te r h a d a p

m a n a je r ia l,

6) p e n g a r u h

K o e fis ie n ja lu r

Ada

k o m itm e n

k o m itm e n

hubungan

k a r a k te r is tik

p e k e r ja a n

te r h a d a p

m e n u n ju k k a n

s a n g a tla h

p e n g a ru h

k a ry a w a n

m e m p e n g a ru h i

c h a r a c te r is tic ,

p e r fo r m a n c e .

c o m m itm e n t

c h a r a c te r is tic s

e m p lo y e e s , it is n e c e s s a r y

te r h a d a p
k in e r ja

m a n a je r ia l

k e r ja d a la m

k o m itm e n

m a n a g e r ia l

te r h a d a p

of jo b

th e jo b

m a n a g e r ia l

k a r a k te r is tik
k e r ja

y a n g m e n je m b a ta n i

p e n in g k a tk a n

K e y w o rd s :

kepuasan

H a s il p e n e litia n

k a ry a w a n

kepuasan

y a n g k u a t te r u ta m a

14

k a ry a w a n

m a n a je r ia l.

k in e r ja

d a r ip a d a

p e k e r ja a n

jo b
fo r

4)

o r g a n iz a tio n a l

c o n tr ib u tio n

b e tw e e n

dan

te r h a d a p

7) P e n g a r u h

m a n a je r ia l,

5) th e in flu e n c e

o r g a n iz a tio n a l

c o e ffic ie n t

e m p lo y e e .

e m p lo y e e

c o m m itm e n t.

m e n g a n a iis a

in i, y a itu

to

s u b s ta n tia lly

in in flu e n c in g

a ffe c tiv e

k a ry a w a n

4 ) p e n g a ru h

P a th

of m a n a g e r ia l

p e r fo r m a n c e

k o m itm e n

p e n e litia n

r e la tio n s h ip

v a r ia b le

e s p e c ia lly

in i a d a la h

k e r ja , d a n
d a la m

th e

m a n a g e r ia l

to

c o n tr ib u tio n

th a t

m a n a g e r ia l

a n a ly s is , a ll p r o p o s e d

h a v e g r e a te s t

show s

v a r ia b le .

s a tis fa c tio n

c o m m itm e n t,

p e n e litia n

kepuasan

b r id g in g

of

e m p lo y e e

c o n tr ib u tio n

c o n tr ib u te s

a c tiv itie s

of

of m a n a g e r ia l

c o m m itm e n t

g r e a te s t

Job

T h e r e a r e s ix h y p o th e s e s

s a tis fa c tio n

c o m m itm e n t
m a n a g e r ia l

C h a r a c te r is tic s ,

6) th e in flu e n c e of o r g a n iz a tio n a l

g re a t

T h e re s e a rc h

p e r fo r m a n c e

th a n jo b

T h e r e fo r e , in o r d e r
o r g a n iz a tio n a l

a n d r e p o r tin g

th a t

have

has a

th e s u p e r v is o r

v a r ia b le .

o n jo b

B a s e d o n th e fin a l d a ta

id e n tity

c o m m itm e n t

v a r ia b le . H o w e v e r , s a tis fa c tio n

of

e m p lo y e e

e m p lo y e e .

and

T h e c o n tin u a n t

of

Job

P e r fo r m a n c e .

o n o r g a n iz a tio n a l

o n p e r fo r m a n c e

of

in flu e n c e

c h a r a c te r is tic s

o n o r g a n iz a tio n a l

of m a n a g e r ia l

o n p e r fo r m a n c e

o n p e r fo r m a n c e

v a r ia b le .

c h a r a c te r is tic s

te s t th e

o n M a n a g e r ia l

of jo b

7) th e in flu e n c e

i.e .

to

and

o r g a n is a s i
m a n a je r ia l.

pem bangunan

k o m itm e n

le b ih b e s a r
O le h k a r e n a
o r g a n is a s i

d ip e r lu k a n

s a tis fa c tio n ,

o r g a n iz a tio n a l

c o m m itm e n t

and

A b str a c t

I

\01. ~ (J.)
· \(TU~tus
;\; ovcrnber 2010 ( 1+ S - 166)
Intl.srit.l'xwvutsrqponmlkjihgfedcbaZYXWVUTSRQPONMLKJIHGFEDCBA
JUR \I M \'\AJI ME\ BiS 1\
c-

G

lobalization

is an era of economic

job design, job satisfaction, organizational

activities and information without

commitment

boundaries

for the sake of effectiveness and efficiency

commodity,
resources

marked

information,

by free

technology

and

in and out of the country

another. Such conditions

encourage

and employee's performance

of organizational goals.

to
the

supply of human resources expertise from

In the context of approaches for design
work motivation,

Hackman and Old ham

other countries. If this happens continuously,

(1975) have developed

without

characteristics

anticipating

some state with its

a model

approach,

here

of job
in

after

human resources will still relatively behind

referred

to

in various fields. It will continue to lag. This

theory.

According

widens the gap among countries, and in turn,

Old ham (1975) in Robbins (2002: 218) the

developing countries will be more difficult to

job

compete with developed countries.

through five principal dimensions of work,

commitment
determine

are essential concepts that
the

organization.

success or failure

These three

of an

concepts

are

significance,

concepts have a different

dimensional

something

through

art

of

achieving

someone else (Parker

Follett in Stoner et. aI., 1996:9). Stoner et.
al (1996:10) refer to management

as the

and

and corrected

and

task

feedback.

feel the

importance

of

work. Job characteristics model has shown

outcome

the

autonomy

will

within a system of organization even allthree

is

Hackman

If all of five dimensions of work are higher,
employees

to

Management

to

characteristics

skill variety, task identity,

essentially inseparable from one another

understanding.

job

should be diagnosed

namely:
Management,job design and organizational

as the

be

positively

associated

with

variables. In particular

work

of five-

work has essentially created

three important

psychological

conditions

which are: skill variety, task identity

and

significance of tasks that contribute to the
increasing importance

of the meaning of

process of planning, organizing, directing

work. Autonomy is intended as a source of

and

achieve

workers' sense of responsibility for the work.

organizational goals. So,management is the

Feedback from work refers to knowledge,

process of planning, organizing, directing

about the work. This variable will eventually

and controlling

refer to multiple benefits for individuals and

controlling

activities

to

activities using people to

achieve organizational goals.

The rationale of understanding

organizations that employ them.

manage-

In summary, combining

the five core of

ment is to achieve organizational goals, it

work dimensions, employees will feel well

must involve human resources through

a

motivated and will alleviate quality in his

better organization. The involvement of hu-

work, very pleased with his work, will have

man resources have essentially complex due

lower absenteeism rates, turnover rates will

to its use for achieving organizational goals

be low too. The next described also that

as planned. It requires creativity in sense of

the theoretical model of job characteristics

continually finding ways, opportunities

would

breakthroughs

and

in use of human resources

organizations. Organizers should consider

be

effective

in

describing

the

person's behavior, which have a high need
for

achievement.

(Robbins,

2002:

220)

The lnlluence ofJnh Charactl'ristic'iZYXWVUTSRQPONMLKJIHGFEDCBA
(W
Jnb 'vati-Lution ()rganil1. ) :\ZYXWVUTSRQPONMLKJIHGFEDCBA
onmlkjihgfedcbaZYXWVUTSRQPONMLKJIHGFEDCBA
JIR
J.

Likert-type
was

scale and an individual

accumulated

(Cronbach

0.704). While, organizational
may be defined

Alpha

identification

in a particular

by 8 (eight) indicators of Heneman (1974).
Respondents

commitment

as the relative strength

of an individual's
involvement

score

)

with and

organization

were

asked

planning, organizing, control, cooperation,
initiative, reporting. Measurement of each
indicator

by

(Cronbach Alpha =0.829).

indicators,

commitment,

namely:

affective

normative commitment

continuant

commitment.

used 5 point

Likert type scale

and

Measurement

of variables by a summative

their

work according to quality standards, work

(Steers, 1977). These variable was measured
three

about

achievement of work objectives, quality of

scale level

Structural Equation Modeling
AMOS 4.01 program

(SEM) with

package and SPSS

(Summated Rating Scale) or known as the

10.0 were using in this study. Full Structural

five-point Likert-type scale (Cronbach Alpha

Equation Model Measurement analyzes job

=0.808). Employees performance

is a real

characteristics, organizational commitment,

achievement or accomplishment

achieved

job satisfaction and employee performance

of employees

with structural equation model (structural

in the quality and quantity
in performing
with

a given

employees

their duties in accordance
responsibility.

performance

was

Managerial
measured

equation

modeling).

SEM measurement

results using AMOS 4.01 program shown in
Figure 1 below.

Figure 1. Full SEM

~

~\_58

jPENSAS'~

~}

:O~~
.68

e.l.5

UMBAL

.30

~

.52

66
eZ.

:s:.

OM

Uji Hipotesis

~
~1~~~

Kepu~
Kerja

--~

.69
eZ.
~

47

ENYE

.54

/

~

~

(g)

Chi-Square = 148'22~
Probability = ,118
OF = 183
GFI= ,945
AGFI= ,927
TU = ,992
CFI = ,993
RMSEA= ,023
Cmin/df = 1,149

.
PELAP

~

50 rre p. nldfY data are processed. 291 0

The lnllucncc

xwvutsrqponmlkjihgfedcbaZYXWVUTSRQPONMLKJIHGFEDCBA
otJllh (. 1arach t'l~tw-; on Joh \atl...,tat'Uon.
OrgalH/Jtiona!
CI,mmnlllcnt
md \1ana,QtrlaI Performance GFEDCBA
l n d i Djastuti

Description of Figure 1:

the job characteristic

KP (Xl) = Job characteristics of managerial-

influence

level employee

variable {KO (X3)}.

variables {KP (Xl)}

on organizational

commitment

VARKET(X1.1) = Variations skills
IDTUG(X1.2) = Identity task

In the conceptual framework, it also notes

SIGTUG(X1.3) = Significance task

that organizational

AUTO(X1.4) = Autonomy

which is not explained by job characteristics

UMBAL (X1.5) = Feedback

variables indicated by the numberofvariable

commitment

variable

variance. This is the conceptual framework
KPK(X2) = Managerial-level employee

given by the symbol (Zl)

satisfaction

culture variables such as leadership style,

SALARY(X2.1) = Satisfaction with salary

while job satisfaction variable which is not

PROMO(X2.2) = Satisfaction with

explained

by job characteristics variables

promotion

indicated

by the number

COMPANION(X2.3) = Satisfaction with

variables that given by the symbol (Z2) for

colleagues

instance organizational culture, leadership

PENYEL(X2.4 = Satisfaction with supervisor

style,

JOBS(X2.S) = Satisfaction with the job itself

characters.

organizational
For

organizational

of variance of

climate,

employee

individual

performance

variables that are not explained
KO (X3)

= Organizational

by the

variable job satisfaction, job characteristics

commitment

AFFEC(X3.1) = Affective commitment

and organizational commitment

CONTI(X3.2) = Continuant commitment

by the amount of variance of variables, that

NORMS(X3.3) = Normative commitment

is given by the symbol (Z3) for instance
organizational

KK(X4)

=

culture,

are shown

leadership

style,

organizational climate, employee attitudes.

Employees Performance of

managerial level

The result of the influence

PENSAS(X4.1 = Achievement of targets

of job characteristics on job satisfaction,

KUAL(X4.2) = Quality of work

organizational commitment

PERENC(X4.3) = Planning work

performance of construction companies in

PENGOR(X4.4) = Organizing

Central Java in Figure 1, it can be said that

PENGEND(X4.5) = Control

the model fits with the data, because they

KERJAS(X4.6) = Cooperation

meet the goodness ofZYXWVUTSRQPONMLKJIHGFEDCBA
fit criteria. To test each

INIS (X4.7) = Initiative

hypothesis, it can be seen in Table 1.

line diagram

and employee

PELAP(X4.8) = Reporting
Table 1 indicates that job characteristics has
From

the

conceptual

framework

in

an effect to organizational

commitment

Figure 1, it can be seen that there are

and have the

relationships

path coefficient 0.789. Also, organizational

between

exogenous

highest

influence

with

a

variables with endogenous variables such

commitment

as employee job characteristics {KP (Xl)}

of

with

{KO

0.473. This model has been empirically fit

{KPK (X2)},

to the data used in this study that can be

and Employee performance {KK (X4)}. Also,

seen from the chi-square model 148.220

Organizational

(X3)}, Employee

Commitment

satisfaction

has an effect to performance

employees

with

a

path

coefficient

)\(n

T a b le

1 E ffe c t O f In te r · V a r ia b le

T a b le 2 T o ta l E ffe c t a m o n g

C o e ffic ie n t

Lane

onmlkjihgfedcbaZYXWVUTSRQPON
beT 'Ol() (4")
166)

xwvutsrqponmlkjihgfedcbaZYXWVUTSRQPONMLK

V a r ia b le s

with a significance level 0.118, Goodness

organizational commitment

of Fit Index

0.945, Adjusted Goodness

performance

of Fit Index

0.927, Tucker Lewis Index

direction. The direct effect is also seen

=

0.992, Cmin / DF (minimum

sample

at

0.473 with

in the influence of job

to employee
a

positive

satisfaction on

discrepancy function divided by the degree

employee performance of 0.212 with

of freedom) = 1-149,Comparative Fit Index

positive direction. While the indirect effect

= 0.993 and the Root Mean Square Error of

of job

Approximation

= 0.023 in the

range from an

a

characteristics on organizational

commitment

is

0.160

(positive).

Job

characteristics are also affected indirectly

expected value.

by 0.507 (positive) on the performance of
Table 1 shows that there are direct effects

employees. Also, job satisfaction has an

of job

indirect influence on the performance of

characteristics on organizational

commitment

0]89

with

positive

employees 0.244 (positive). Because the

direction and of job characteristics on job

indirect effects of job characteristics on

satisfaction 0297 with a positive direction.

employee performance (0.507) is higher

While, the influence of job characteristics

than the direct effects of job characteristics

on the performance of employees is 0.311

on the performance of employees (0.311).It

with

a positive

can be stated that there are variables that

the

influence

direction.
of

job

a

Furthermore,

satisfaction

organizational commitment

on

is 0.516 with

a positive direction and the influence of

mediate the influence of job characteristics
on employee performance.

lndixwvutsrqponmlkjihgfedcbaZ

01

Table 2 above
total

effect

shows that

of

organizational

job

there

commitment

characteristics on job

on

amounted

to 0.949 with a positive direction
job

is a

characteristics

and of

satisfaction

of

fourth hypothesis is accepted. Hypothesis 5
states that organizational commitment
a significant

has

positive effect on employee

performance.

It

refers to the significant

level of 5% which obtained

a probability

0.297 with a positive direction. While the

value of 0.000 which is below 0.05. Thus it

influence

the

can be stated that hypothesis 5 is accepted.

performance of employees is 0.818 with a

Hypothesis 6 states that job satisfaction has

positive direction.

a significant

positive effect on employee

effect of job satisfaction on organizational

performance.

It

commitment

of 5% which obtained a probability

of job

characteristics

Furthermore, the total

amounting

a positive direction
organizational
performance

on

to

0.516 with

and the influence of

commitment
amounted

to employee

to 0.473 with

stated that hypothesis 6 is accepted.

a
R E S U L T S

in the

Job

employee

of job

performance

satisfaction

value

of 0.018 which is below 0.05. Thus it can be

positive direction. Total effect is also seen
influence

refers to the significant level

on

of 0.456 with

a

positive direction.

A N D

D IS C U S S IO N

characteristics

significant

have

positive

effects on job

satisfaction

and
as

stated with the previous studies (Bhuidan
and Menguc, 2002; Glisson and Durick,

Hypothesis 1 stated that job characteristics

1998, Sneed and Herman, 1990). These

have a significant

findings

positive effect on job

indicate

that

employees

of

satisfaction. It refers to the significant level

construction companies have assessed that

of 5% which obtained a probability

their work is designed with the motivational

value

of 0.004 which is below 0.05. Thus it can be

fiv e dimensions
approach by applying the ZYXWVUTSRQPONMLKJIHGFEDCBA

stated that the hypothesis 1 is accepted.

of work which are: skill variety, task identity,

Hypothesis 2 states that job satisfaction has

task significance, autonomy and feedback.

a significant positive effect on organizational

Those

commitment.CBA
It
refers to the significant

satisfaction. The means that employment

level of 5% which obtained a probability

in

value of 0.000 which is below 0.05. Thus

with a variety of high skill. Task identity is

it can be stated that the hypothesis 2 is

clear and with a clear task significance that

accepted.

job

provides a clear feedback of their work

characteristics have a significantly positive

either to received praise or reprimand, or

effect on organizational

to give awards for outstanding

Hypothesis

3 states that

commitment.

It

have

improved

construction

employee's

companies

job

is designed

workers or

refers to the significant level of 5% which

to give penalties for employees who make

obtained a probability value of 0.004 which

mistakes.

is below 0.05. Thus it can be stated that the
hypothesis 3 is accepted. Hypothesis 4 states

Employees

that the job characteristics have a significant

construction

companies are also assigned

positive effect on employee performance.

with

responsibility

It

the

at

managerial

ranging

level

in

relating
from

the

to

refers to the significant level of 5% which

managerial jobs

planning,

obtained a probability value of 0.000 which

organizing, directing

is below 0.05. Thus it can be stated that the

known, the characteristic of construction

and control. As it is

[ntcgrita,

Ml ~ xwvutsrqponmlkjihgfedcbaZYXWVUTSRQPONMLKJIHGFEDCBA
BI~. IS
vol. i ~o . .2'
-\§,.rumls
ovcmber 2010 ([+3 - 166)

JURi\' \[ .\B~AJI

project work

is unique, which

the

resources such as labor,

different

money,

machines,

methods,

requires

who has supported another employee who
works with full responsibility. Supervisors

materials,

give his subordinates moral support and

organizational diversity, goals that involve

provide high motivation. Employees also

a number

of individuals

feel a sense of fun and interested in their

expertise,

a

certain

with

different

personality

and

character of uncertain tasks. In the normal

work. They feel quite successful in carrying
out the work that is currently done.

construction project there is a stage which
is processing the project resources to be a

Research from Alpander (1990), Poznanski

result of construction activities. The process

(1997)

showed

that

job

satisfaction

that occur in a series of activities involving

positively and significantly influence the

different parties directly or indirectly, such

organizational

as project owners, consultants, planners,

who gain job satisfaction show support and

subcontractors,

loyalty to the organization.

institutions,

suppliers,

government,

financial
labor.

commitment.

Employees

The

management's duty is to make coordination

Job characteristics have a significant positive

to all parties involved in the construction

effect

project, so that,

can be

Thesefindinqs indicate that the managerial-

achieved with all parties to an optimal level.

level employees of construction companies

Therefore, careful planning must take into

assessthat the work on construction services

account for the five dimensions of work in

company is designed with a motivational

construction companies.

approach that

its objectives

on

organizational

commitment.

is by applying

the five

dimensions of job such as skill variety, task
Job satisfaction has a positive effect on

identity, task significance, autonomy and

organizational commitment

feedback has increased the commitment of

as indicated

with the previous studies (Alpander, 1990;

the organization. Employee who works with

Poznanski, 1997; De Connick, et. al., 1992,

a high diversity of skills or accompanied

Sneed and Herman, 1990). These findings

the work with a variety of activities, range

indicate that job satisfaction within

the

of responsibilities, non-monotonous, task

necessary to

identity in the sense that there is a clear

organization

is absolutely

create organizational

commitment.

Job

objective in carrying out the work will

satisfaction comprises five dimensions such

have highly commitment.

as satisfaction with salary, satisfaction with

given the opportunity and involvement in

promotion,

eo-workers,

completing a job from beginning to end.

supervisor and worker

This findings are consistent with Dunham

satisfaction of job itself. Managerial-level

(1994), Sneed and Herman (1990), also

satisfaction with

satisfaction with

employees

of

construction

companies

Hunt,

Chonko

and

Employees are

Wood

(1985) who

perceived that the five dimensions of job

explains that the job characteristics affect

satisfaction have improved organizational

organizational commitment. Agarwal and

commitment. Salary received by employees,

Ramaswari (1997), also provide evidence

fairness

that job characteristics affect organizational

either

internal

aspects, promotion

and

external

policy that meet the

expectations of employees, a colleague

commitment.

In this study resulted that

the direct effect of job characteristics on

The Influence ol ]ob Charectcristics on Joh \ati ...
.laction, Organi'/Jtional

organizational commitment is higher than
job characteristics on job satisfaction.

and \.-Lln,1gl'riJlxwvutsrqponmlkjihgfedcbaZYXWVUTSRQP
1\· 'orr ,1Ih....GFEDCBA
In d i D ja stu ti

Commiuncn;

theory of Hackman and Old ham (1975)
in Robbins (2002). Design works by five
dimensions are: skill variety, task identity,

Job characteristics have a positive effect

significance, autonomy and feedback have

on the performance of managerial level

a positive side. These five dimensions will

employees. This result indicates that the

increase job satisfaction, high motivation,

managerial-level employees of construction

high work involvement, job performance

companies perceived their work, which is

and lower the level of absenteeism and

designed with a motivational approach that

employee

turn-over.

Langner

et

aI.,

is by applying the five dimensions of job

(1988) also proved the influence of job

skill variety, task identity, task significance,

characteristics on employee performance.

autonomy and feedback have improved
thei r performa nce.Thiscan be explained that

Job satisfaction has a positive effect on the

when employees do the work by combining

performance of managerial employees. This

the five dimensions of employment, the

finding is consistent with the researches

employee has been encouraged to perform

conducted by Langner et aI., (1988). These

work

finding indicates that the managerial-level

with

high

performance.

A

high

performance is shown by the fulfillment

employees

of

construction

companies

of the indicator that has been specified

perceived job

in the performance of managerial level

support

employees. Furthermore, good quality work

influence

can be seen from the result of employees'

employee performance occurs because the

compliance with the desired quality of the

managerial level employees of construction

company. Employees have to use extra

companies

effort in completing their work. After all,

between what they want and what

they are always working on the task in

realistic to have.

accordance with

also influenced by job characteristics and

a given

responsibility.

satisfaction is needed to

employee
between

performance.
job

recognize

The

satisfactions to

the

relationship
is

High performance is

Employees are always actively working

organizational

to set targets on each unit. This is done

coefficient of job satisfaction on employee

when employees are involved in preparing

performance

project budgets and company budgets.

compared to the influence of organizational

Managerial

commitment

employee

in

construction

commitment.

indicates

a

The

low

path

number

on employee performance.

company also has a skill in set-sharing,

This indicates that for managerial level

delegation

in

employees of construction companies, the

carrying out his job, employment, keeping

role of organizational commitment is higher

of authority, coordination

and maintain working relationships with

than the role of job satisfaction. This can

the boss, subordinates and others, having

occur due to general economic conditions

initiative, creativity and always having new

that have an impact on employee behavior.

ideas in doing his job. Employee also has

In Indonesia's current economic conditions,

the skill in preparing the reports that have

with 12.6 million unemployment, and high

been systematically compiled and updated.

inflation (18%),to get the job for someone is
something being expected in and has their

These findings fit with job characteristics

families also. The opportunity to get a job

Integritas

MA:\'AJEMEN BI'i:\'lS xwvutsrqponmlkjihgfedcbaZYXWVUTSRQPONMLKJIHGFEDCBA
I Vo!. 3 No. 2 I Agustus - Novemher 2010 (14')

]UR'\AI

1(6)

will ease the burden of life. Furthermore,

commitment

it could also help in actualizing employees

when leaving the company. For employees,

needs and in developing employee's skills

it is unethical to move from one organization

and ability.

to another. According to Mowday, Porter

makes employees feel loss

and Steers (1982), commitment is defined
Organizational commitment has a positive

as a strong desire to remain a member of an

influence on the performance of manage-

organization, a willingness to try with high

rial level employees. Employee has per-

spirits (hard work) for the organization. Trust

ceived that to enhance employee perfor-

acceptance of the values or goals of the

mance is absolutely necessary highly orga-

organization Meyer and Alien (1991, 1993).

nizational commitment. High commitment

The findings also fit with studies of Bishop et

organization is carried out by managerial

aI., (1997) that organizational commitment

level employee at a construction company,

has affected the performance of employees.

due to the activities of construction projects involving related parties, directly or

With five dimensions of job characteristics

indirectly. Each party has specific targets to

that

be achieved. Project management needs to

employee job satisfaction managerial levels

consider the involvement of each, as well

of construction company have implications

as employment related to their respective

for the need to continually

functions and the cooperation of the par-

level of job satisfaction of employees to

ties involved in the project. Functionally,

ensure employees continue to feel satisfied.

the parties involved in construction pro-

Hackman and Oldham (1976) stated that

jects are project owner, consultants and

five of the principal dimensions such as

have

been

proven

to

increase

review the

contractors. While the construction work is

skill variety, task identity, task Significance,

carried out, it must also take into account

autonomy and feedback ware developed

the type of construction: heavy enginee-

to

ring projects, buildings construction, and

satisfaction. Therefore, HR managers need

residential

State

to use the concept of Hackman and Old ham

budget condition (how to speed return on

for each job. It is designed and improved

investment), technical work and project

through

administration.

implication is that employees will feel a

building

construction.

Nature of project: single,

repeated and long term.

motivate

five

and

enhance

different

employee

dimensions. The

sense of importance, feel a responsibility
to reach a particular work. Thus, there will

Organizational

commitment

relationship

be a connection between what is in the

with employee performance has occurred

design work with what employees want.

where a high organizational commitment

It will

with indicators such as: when it is observed

satisfaction.

psychologically

affect

employee

that the employee want to stay, and feel
emotionally attached to the organization.

Some of the ways that can also be used

From continuant commitment employees,

to increase job satisfaction is specifically

they feel reluctant to leave the job because

related to job design with the motivational

they might find difficulty to look for another

approach

job if they exit/quit

enlargement). Job enlargement is trying to

the job. Normative

in

division

of

work

(job

(

J

xwvutsrqponmlkjihgfedcbaZYXWVUTSRQPONMLKJIHGFEDCBA
()

11

overcome job dissatisfaction by increasing

While, the feedback emphasizes the degree

job scope. Job scope shows the number

to which an employee receives information

and variety of different tasks or activities

at their work that reveals how well they

undertaken by the holder of the job. In this

work.

way, the various functions of the horizontal

dimensions have implications to encourage

work of the sub units are combined with

organizational

the organization that can give a variation

who have high job satisfaction, would have

of tasks for employees. This could

also

a positive belief in the organization. This

system,

resulted if employees feel at ease in the

be done using the job

rotation

Satisfaction

created

by

commitment.

the

five

Employees

so employees can rotate from one job to

organization

another. Job enrichment, which overcomes

and values. It makes the employees who is

the dissatisfaction

working at a construction company favored

from work by making

the job more deep and challenging.
job enlargement

and all of its existing goals

This

the company / organization with the values

is done vertically. That

and goals and they have an interest to

is an organizational