ppt rd consortia a case study 1997
TRLabs
R&D Consortia:
a Case Study
TRLabs
R&D Consortia
A Growing Trend
200 - 300 in North America
A Special Form of Strategic Alliance
Industry
University
Government
TRLabs Why
Consortia in R&D?
everage • Synergy • Complementarit
Resources
Skills/Personnel
Financial
Markets
Technology
TRLabs
National
Economic Prosperity
Positive Effects
Capability in Science & Technology
People - Quality of Labour
Infrastructure
Public/Private Sector Cooperation
TRLabs
MNEs
Universities
Participants
SMEs
Governments
TRLabs
Industry Participation
Leverage
Technology & People Outputs
Public Relations
Networking with Strategic Partners
Univeristy/Academic Interaction
TRLabs University
Participation
Relevance to Industry and Society
Financial Benefits
Research Output
Education & Student Placement
TRLabs
Government
Participation
Economic Development
Infrastructure Development
S&T Capability
Human Resource Development
TRLabs
Types of Consortia
Open vs Closed Membership
Horizontal vs Vertical vs Inter-Sectoral
Government-Led vs Industry-Led vs University-Led
For-Profit vs Not-for-Profit
Pre-Competitive vs Competitive
Perpetual vs Limited Life
Administrative vs Operational
Project Oriented vs Goal Oriented
Holds IP vs No IP
Directed vs Pooled Research
Buffet vs a la Carte
TRLabs
TRLabs
A Successful Example
since 1986
TRLabs
Designing TRLabs
Open vs Closed
Open to Any Organization
TRLabs
Designing TRLabs
Horizontal vs Vertical vs Inter-sectoral
Telecom & Information Technology
TRLabs
Designing TRLabs
Government-Led vs Industry-Led vs University-Led
Senior Board Representation
Majority from Industry
Chairman from Industry
President from Industry
TRLabs
Designing TRLabs
For-Profit vs Not-for-Profit
Surplus not Taxable
No Dividend Payout
R&D Tax Credits for Members
Designing TRLabs
TRLabs
Pre-Competitive vs Competitive
Basic
Research
UNIVERSITY
Applied
Research
Application
Development
Product
Development
Design &
Engineering
INDUSTRY
TRLabs
Pre-Competitive
Dynamic
Highly Competitive
Global Markets
Collaborative
Precompetitive
Alliances
Collaboration
Stronger
Individual
Competitors
TRLabs
Designing TRLabs
Perpetual vs Limited Life
5
Year, Renewable Agreements
TRLabs
Designing TRLabs
Administrative vs Operational
Network of Laboratories
Quality of Interaction
Industry Secondments
Student Education
Facilities
TRLabs
Designing TRLabs
Project Oriented vs Goal Oriented
Generate Outputs in
People & Technology
to support the Goals of its Members
Business Advantage
Academic Achievement
Economic Development
TRLabs
Designing TRLabs
Holds IP vs No IP
Staff
Researchers
Industry
Sponsors
Commercialization
Professors
Rights held by
Industry
Researchers
TRLabs
Third
Parties
University
Sponsors
Education, Research
Students
Inventors
R&D Consortia:
a Case Study
TRLabs
R&D Consortia
A Growing Trend
200 - 300 in North America
A Special Form of Strategic Alliance
Industry
University
Government
TRLabs Why
Consortia in R&D?
everage • Synergy • Complementarit
Resources
Skills/Personnel
Financial
Markets
Technology
TRLabs
National
Economic Prosperity
Positive Effects
Capability in Science & Technology
People - Quality of Labour
Infrastructure
Public/Private Sector Cooperation
TRLabs
MNEs
Universities
Participants
SMEs
Governments
TRLabs
Industry Participation
Leverage
Technology & People Outputs
Public Relations
Networking with Strategic Partners
Univeristy/Academic Interaction
TRLabs University
Participation
Relevance to Industry and Society
Financial Benefits
Research Output
Education & Student Placement
TRLabs
Government
Participation
Economic Development
Infrastructure Development
S&T Capability
Human Resource Development
TRLabs
Types of Consortia
Open vs Closed Membership
Horizontal vs Vertical vs Inter-Sectoral
Government-Led vs Industry-Led vs University-Led
For-Profit vs Not-for-Profit
Pre-Competitive vs Competitive
Perpetual vs Limited Life
Administrative vs Operational
Project Oriented vs Goal Oriented
Holds IP vs No IP
Directed vs Pooled Research
Buffet vs a la Carte
TRLabs
TRLabs
A Successful Example
since 1986
TRLabs
Designing TRLabs
Open vs Closed
Open to Any Organization
TRLabs
Designing TRLabs
Horizontal vs Vertical vs Inter-sectoral
Telecom & Information Technology
TRLabs
Designing TRLabs
Government-Led vs Industry-Led vs University-Led
Senior Board Representation
Majority from Industry
Chairman from Industry
President from Industry
TRLabs
Designing TRLabs
For-Profit vs Not-for-Profit
Surplus not Taxable
No Dividend Payout
R&D Tax Credits for Members
Designing TRLabs
TRLabs
Pre-Competitive vs Competitive
Basic
Research
UNIVERSITY
Applied
Research
Application
Development
Product
Development
Design &
Engineering
INDUSTRY
TRLabs
Pre-Competitive
Dynamic
Highly Competitive
Global Markets
Collaborative
Precompetitive
Alliances
Collaboration
Stronger
Individual
Competitors
TRLabs
Designing TRLabs
Perpetual vs Limited Life
5
Year, Renewable Agreements
TRLabs
Designing TRLabs
Administrative vs Operational
Network of Laboratories
Quality of Interaction
Industry Secondments
Student Education
Facilities
TRLabs
Designing TRLabs
Project Oriented vs Goal Oriented
Generate Outputs in
People & Technology
to support the Goals of its Members
Business Advantage
Academic Achievement
Economic Development
TRLabs
Designing TRLabs
Holds IP vs No IP
Staff
Researchers
Industry
Sponsors
Commercialization
Professors
Rights held by
Industry
Researchers
TRLabs
Third
Parties
University
Sponsors
Education, Research
Students
Inventors