THE EFFECTIVENESS OF “THE POWER OF TWO” STRATEGY IN STUDENTS’ READING COMPREHENSION IN NARRATIVE TEXT - repository perpustakaan

  APPENDIX

  1

  Validity, Reliability, and Item Difficult of Pre-test

   Validity, Reliability, and Item Difficult of Post-test  Example of validity computation

  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

13

14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

1

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 19 361 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

1

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 15 225 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

1

1 1 1 1 1 1 19 361 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 13 169 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 9 81

  1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

1

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 20 400 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

1

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 20 400 1 1 1 1 1 1

1

1 1 1 10 100 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

1

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 25 625 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 13 169 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 22 484

  1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

1

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 22 484 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

1

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 22 484 1 1 1 1 1 1

1

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 14 196 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

1

1 1 1 1 1 13 169 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

1

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 18 324 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

1

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 25 625

  1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

1

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 23 529 1 1 1 1

1

1 1 1 1 1 10 100 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

1

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 21 441 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 16 256 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

1

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 19 361 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 11 121

  1 1 1 1 1 1 1

1

1 1 1 1 12 144 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

1

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 17 289 1 1 1 1

1

1 1 1 1 1 1 11 121 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 16 256 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 13 169 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 14 196

  1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

1

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 25 625 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

1

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 25 625 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

1

1 1 1 1 13 169

  X 30 22 27 27 23 21 25 17 22 20 18 24

23

18 22 22 16 24 19 20 19 22 23 20 21 545 10059

  X 2 30 22 27 27 23 21 25 17 22 20 18 24

23

18 22 22 16 24 19 20 19 22 23 20 21 ( X) 2

900 484 729 729 529 441 625 289 484 400 324 576 529 324 484 484 256 576 361 400 361 484 529 400 441

Y 545 545 545 545 545 545 545 545 545 545 545 545 545 545 545 545 545 545 545 545 545 545 545 545 545 Y 2

10059 10059 10059 10059 10059 10059 10059 10059 10059 10059 10059 10059 10059 10059 10059 10059 10059 10059 10059 10059 10059 10059 10059 10059 10059

( Y) 2 3E+05 3E+05 3E+05 3E+05 3E+05 3E+05 3E+05 3E+05 3E+05 3E+05 3E+05 3E+05

3E+05

3E+05 3E+05 3E+05 3E+05 3E+05 3E+05 3E+05 3E+05 3E+05 3E+05 3E+05 3E+05

  XY

518 427 473 473 447 382 455 310 438 395 326 450 418 346 407 409 329 428 368 386 335 418 409 380 403

r XY 0,385 0,716 0,430 0,430 0,780 0,425 0,448 0,360 0,866 0,712 0,448 0,604 0,371 0,504 0,442 0,469 0,717 0,382 0,573 0,594 0,449 0,593 0,444 0,516 0,605 r table 0,349 0,349 0,349 0,349 0,349 0,349 0,349 0,349 0,349 0,349 0,349 0,349 0,349 0,349 0,349 0,349 0,349 0,349 0,349 0,349 0,349 0,349 0,349 0,349 0,349 Result Valid Valid Valid Valid Valid Valid Valid Valid Valid Valid Valid Valid Valid Valid Valid Valid Valid Valid Valid Valid Valid Valid Valid Valid Valid R 30 22 27 27 23 21 25 17 22 20 18 24

23

18 22 22 16 24 19 20 19 22 23 20 21 N 32 32 32 32 32 32 32 32 32 32 32 32

32

32 32 32 32 32 32 32 32 32 32 32 32 RN 0,938 0,688 0,844 0,844 0,719 0,656 0,781 0,531 0,688 0,625 0,563 0,750 0,719 0,563 0,688 0,688 0,500 0,750 0,594 0,625 0,594 0,688 0,719 0,625 0,656 R.N 0,938 0,688 0,844 0,844 0,719 0,656 0,781 0,531 0,688 0,625 0,563 0,750 0,719 0,563 0,688 0,688 0,500 0,750 0,594 0,625 0,594 0,688 0,719 0,625 0,656 Criteria Easy M edium Easy Easy Easy M edium Easy M ediumM ediumM ediumM edium Easy Easy M ediumM ediumM ediumM edium Easy M ediumM ediumM ediumM edium Easy M ediumM edium p 0,938 0,688 0,844 0,844 0,719 0,656 0,781 0,531 0,688 0,625 0,563 0,750 0,719 0,563 0,688 0,688 0,500 0,750 0,594 0,625 0,594 0,688 0,719 0,625 0,656 q 0,063 0,313 0,156 0,156 0,281 0,344 0,219 0,469 0,313 0,375 0,438 0,250 0,281 0,438 0,313 0,313 0,500 0,250 0,406 0,375 0,406 0,313 0,281 0,375 0,344 p q 0,059 0,215 0,132 0,132 0,202 0,226 0,171 0,249 0,215 0,234 0,246 0,188 0,202 0,246 0,215 0,215 0,250 0,188 0,241 0,234 0,241 0,215 0,202 0,234 0,226 pq 5,177 Vt 24,280 k Result Reliable 25 r11 0,819 rtable 0,349 8 9 10 3 4 5 6 7 Y 2 2 Responden Y 1 Number of Items Number of Items Number of Items 11 12 13 23 18 21 22 19 20 30 31 14 Re lia bi lit y 27 28 29 32 V al idi ty Fa ci lit y V al ue 26 15 24 25 16 17 THE EFFECTIVENESS OF ...,SUTENG SULISTIANI, PBI FKIP, UMP 2015

  Validity, Re liability, and Facility Value of Pre Te s t 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

13

14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

1

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 19 361 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

1

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 15 225 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

1

1 1 1 1 1 1 19 361 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 13 169

  1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 9 81 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

1

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 20 400 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

1

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 20 400 1 1 1 1 1 1

1

1 1 1 10 100 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

1

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 25 625 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 13 169 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 22 484 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

1

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 22 484

  1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

1

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 22 484 1 1 1 1 1 1

1

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 14 196 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

1

1 1 1 1 1 13 169 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

1

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 18 324 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

1

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 25 625 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

1

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 23 529 1 1 1 1

1

1 1 1 1 1 10 100 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

1

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 21 441

  1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 16 256 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

1

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 19 361 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 11 121 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

1

1 1 1 1 12 144 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

1

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 17 289 1 1 1 1

1

1 1 1 1 1 1 11 121 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 16 256 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 13 169

  1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 14 196 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

1

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 25 625 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

1

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 25 625 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

1

1 1 1 1 13 169 X 30 22 27 27 23 21 25 17 22 20 18 24

23

18 22 22 16 24 19 20 19 22 23 20 21 545 10059 X 2 30 22 27 27 23 21 25 17 22 20 18 24

23

18 22 22 16 24 19 20 19 22 23 20 21 ( X) Y 545 545 545 545 545 545 545 545 545 545 545 545 545 545 545 545 545 545 545 545 545 545 545 545 545 2

900 484 729 729 529 441 625 289 484 400 324 576 529 324 484 484 256 576 361 400 361 484 529 400 441

Y ( Y) 2

10059 10059 10059 10059 10059 10059 10059 10059 10059 10059 10059 10059 10059 10059 10059 10059 10059 10059 10059 10059 10059 10059 10059 10059 10059

2 3E+05 3E+05 3E+05 3E+05 3E+05 3E+05 3E+05 3E+05 3E+05 3E+05 3E+05 3E+05

3E+05

3E+05 3E+05 3E+05 3E+05 3E+05 3E+05 3E+05 3E+05 3E+05 3E+05 3E+05 3E+05 XY

518 427 473 473 447 382 455 310 438 395 326 450 418 346 407 409 329 428 368 386 335 418 409 380 403

r XY

0,385 0,716 0,430 0,430 0,780 0,425 0,448 0,360 0,866 0,712 0,448 0,604 0,371 0,504 0,442 0,469 0,717 0,382 0,573 0,594 0,449 0,593 0,444 0,516 0,605

r table 0,349 0,349 0,349 0,349 0,349 0,349 0,349 0,349 0,349 0,349 0,349 0,349 0,349 0,349 0,349 0,349 0,349 0,349 0,349 0,349 0,349 0,349 0,349 0,349 0,349 Result Valid Valid Valid Valid Valid Valid Valid Valid Valid Valid Valid Valid Valid Valid Valid Valid Valid Valid Valid Valid Valid Valid Valid Valid Valid R 30 22 27 27 23 21 25 17 22 20 18 24

23

18 22 22 16 24 19 20 19 22 23 20 21 N 32 32 32 32 32 32 32 32 32 32 32 32

32

32 32 32 32 32 32 32 32 32 32 32 32 RN 0,938 0,688 0,844 0,844 0,719 0,656 0,781 0,531 0,688 0,625 0,563 0,750 0,719 0,563 0,688 0,688 0,500 0,750 0,594 0,625 0,594 0,688 0,719 0,625 0,656 R.N 0,938 0,688 0,844 0,844 0,719 0,656 0,781 0,531 0,688 0,625 0,563 0,750 0,719 0,563 0,688 0,688 0,500 0,750 0,594 0,625 0,594 0,688 0,719 0,625 0,656 Criteria Easy M edium Easy Easy Easy M edium Easy M ediumM ediumM ediumM edium Easy Easy M ediumM ediumM ediumM edium Easy M ediumM ediumM ediumM edium Easy M ediumM edium p 0,938 0,688 0,844 0,844 0,719 0,656 0,781 0,531 0,688 0,625 0,563 0,750 0,719 0,563 0,688 0,688 0,500 0,750 0,594 0,625 0,594 0,688 0,719 0,625 0,656 q 0,063 0,313 0,156 0,156 0,281 0,344 0,219 0,469 0,313 0,375 0,438 0,250 0,281 0,438 0,313 0,313 0,500 0,250 0,406 0,375 0,406 0,313 0,281 0,375 0,344 p q 0,059 0,215 0,132 0,132 0,202 0,226 0,171 0,249 0,215 0,234 0,246 0,188 0,202 0,246 0,215 0,215 0,250 0,188 0,241 0,234 0,241 0,215 0,202 0,234 0,226 p q 5,177 Vt 24,280 k Result Reliable 25 r11 0,819 rtable 0,349 8 9 10 3 4 5 6 7 Y 2 2 Responden Y 1 Number of Items Number of Items Number of Items 11 12 13 23 18 21 22 19 20 30 31 14 Re lia bi lit y 27 28 29 Fa 32 V ali di ty cil ity V alue 26 15 24 25 16 17 THE EFFECTIVENESS OF ...,SUTENG SULISTIANI, PBI FKIP, UMP 2015

  Computation of t-test

  Data: Mx =

  = = 29.125 =

  ( )

  = 29712

  ( )

  = 29712 = 29712

  My = = = 18.375 =

  ( )

  = 13520

  ( )

  = 13520 = 13520 10804.5 = 2715.5

  • – 27144.5 = 2567.5
  • – √(

  t =

  )( ) t =

  √( )( ) =

  √( )( )

  =

  √( )( )

  =

  √

  = = 4.33

  d.f = Nx

  Ny – = 32

  32

  • – 2 = 62

  Calculation of Validity Pretest: r xy

  N = 32 xy = 427 = 22 x = 545 y

  2

  = 22 x

  2

  = 484 ( x)

  2

  = 10059 y

  2

  = 297025 ( y)

  ( ) ( )

  √* ( ) ( ) ( ) ( )

  √* ( ) ( ( ) √( ) ( )

  √( ) ( ) √

  = 0.716

  r > r xy table = 0.716 > 0.349 = Valid.

  Calculation of Validity Posttest: r xy

  N = 32 xy = 531 = 28 x = 563 y

  2

  = 28 x

  2

  = 784 ( x)

  2

  = 11041 y

  2

  = 316969 ( y)

  ( ) ( )

  √* ( ) ( ) ( ) ( )

  √* ( ) ( ( ) √( ) ( ) √( ) ( )

  √

  = 0.609 r > r xy table = 0.609 > 0.349 = Valid.

  Calculation of Reliability Pretest: r

  11

  2

  = 10059 y

  2

  = 297025 ( y) N = 32

  ( )

  Vt =

  =

  Vt

  =

  Vt

  =

  Vt 24.280 k = 25 Vt = 24.280 Σpq

  = ( ) ( )

  = ( ) ( )

  = ( ) ( )

  1.0411 x 0.786

  = = 0.819 r > r 11 table = 0.819 > 0.349 = Reliable

  Calculation of Reliability Posttest: r

  11

  2

  = 11041 y

  2

  = 316969 ( y) N = 32

  ( )

  Vt =

  =

  Vt

  =

  Vt

  =

  Vt

  =

  Vt

  35.49 k = 25 Vt = 35.49 Σpq

  = ( ) ( )

  = ( ) ( )

  = ( ) ( )

  1.0417 x 0.856

  =

  0.891

  = r > r 11 table = 0.891 > 0.349 = Reliable

  Facility Value of Pretest

  Criteria :- 0.1-0.30 = difficult

  • 0.31-0,70 = medium
  • 0.71-1 = easy

  ( u r r t s r) ( tu ts t t t st)

  0.938 (easy)

  = = Facility Value of Posttest

  ( u r r t s r) ( tu ts t t t st)

  0.875 (easy)

  = =

  The students ’ competency Categories: 81-100% of the correct answers = very good 61-80% of the correct answer = good 41-60% of the correct answer = fair 21-40% of the correct answer = bad 0-20% of the correct answer = very bad 1.

   Experimental class a. pre test

  P = 100%

  x

  ( r qu r t s r) (t t t s)

  =

  ( ) b.

   post test

  P = x 100% =

  ( r)

  2. control class a. pre test

  P x 100%

  =

  = ( r) b.

   post test

  P x 100% =

  ( )

  APPENDIX 2  r-table  t-table T-table α untuk uji dua pihak (two tail tes)

  0.50

  0.20

  0.10

  0.05

  0.02

  0.01 α untuk uji satu pihak (one tail tes)

  DF

  0.25

  0.10 0.05 0.025 0.01 0.005 56 0.679 1,297 1,673 2,003 2,395 2,667 57 0.679 1,297 1,672 2,002 2,394 2,665 58 0.679 1,296 1,672 2,002 2,392 2,663 59 0.679 1,296 1,671 2,001 2,391 2,662 60 0.679 1,296 1,671 2,000 2,390 2,660 61 0.679 1,296 1,670 2,000 2,389 2,659 62 0.678 1,295

  1,670

  1,999 2,388 2,657 63 0.678 1,295 1,669 1,998 2,387 2,656 64 0.678 1,295 1,669 1,998 2,386 2,655 65 0.678 1,295 1,669 1,997 2,385 2,654 66 0.678 1,295 1,668 1,997 2,384 2,652 67 0.678 1,294 1,668 1,996 2,383 2,651 68 0.678 1,294 1,668 1,995 2,382 2,650 69 0.678 1,294 1,667 1,995 2,382 2,949 70 0.678 1,294 1,667 1,994 2,381 2,648 71 0.678 1,294 1,667 1,994 2,380 2,647 72 0.678 1,293 1,666 1,993 2,379 2,646 73 0.678 1,293 1,666 1,993 2,379 2,645 74 0.678 1,293 1,666 1,993 2,378 2,644 75 0.678 1,293 1,665 1,992 2,377 2,643 76 0.678 1,293 1,665 1,992 2,376 2,642 77 0.678 1,293 1,665 1,992 2,376 2,641 78 0.678 1,292 1,665 1,992 2,375 2,640 79 0.678 1,292 1,664 1,990 2,374 2,640 80 0.678 1,292 1,664 1,990 2,374 2,639 r-table N

  Sig. Level N

  32

  0.59 43 0.301 0.389 600 0.08 0.105 19 0.456 0.575 44 0.297 0.384 700 0.074 0.097 20 0.444 0.561 45 0.294 0.38 800 0.07 0.091 21 0.438 0.549 46 0.291 0.376 900 0.065 0.086 22 0.423 0.537 47 0.288 0.372 1000 0.062 0.081 23 0.413 0.526 48 0.284 0.368 24 0.404 0.515 49 0.281 0.368 25 0.396 0.505 50 0.279 0.361 26 0.388 0.496 55 0.266 0.345 27 0.381 0.487 60 0.254

  0.21 13 0.553 0.684 38 0.32 0.413 175 0.148 0.194 14 0.532 0.661 39 0.316 0.408 200 0.138 0.181 15 0.514 0.641 40 0.312 0.403 300 0.113 0.148 16 0.497 0.623 41 0.308 0.398 400 0.098 0.128 17 0.482 0.606 42 0.304 0.393 500 0.088 0.115 18 0.458

  0.23 12 0.576 0.708 37 0.325 0.418 150 0.159

  0.27 9 0.666 0.798 34 0.339 0.436 95 0.202 0.263 10 0.632 0.765 35 0.334 0.43 100 0.195 0.256 11 0.602 0.735 36 0.329 0.424 125 0.176

  0.449 85 0.213 0.278 8 0.707 0.834 33 0.344 0.442 90 0.207

  0.349

  80 0.22 0.286 7 0.754 0.874

  Sig. Level N

  0.47 70 0.235 0.306 5 0.878 0.959 30 0.361 0.463 75 0.227 0.296 6 0.811 0.917 31 0.355 0.456

  0.99 29 0.366

  0.95

  4

  28 0.374 0.478 65 0.244 0.317

  Sig. Level 5% 1% 5% 1% 5% 1% 3 0.997 0.999

  0.33

  APPENDIX 3  Students’ score in experimental class

 The individual competence of pre-test and post-test of experimental

class  Students’ score in control class

 The individual competence of pre-test and post-test of control class

  

DAFTAR NILAI PRE & POST TEST KELAS 8A (EXPERIMENTAL

GROUP)

SMPN 2 BINANGUN TAHUN PELAJARAN 2014/2015

  21 Septi Kusuma Ningrum

  24 Sugeng Priono

  92

  64

  23 Sri Wahyuni

  80

  56

  22 Sri Astuti

  76

  44

  88

  52

  36

  20 Rusminah

  64

  40

  19 Romahtul Umiyah

  76

  48

  18 Ridwan Syururi

  60

  32

  25 Suguanto

  17 Retno Asih Amelia

  44

  40

  32 Wulan Saputri

  76

  44

  31 Viki Novianto

  88

  68

  30 Tri Tuandar

  76

  29 Triana Dea

  36

  76

  52

  28 Torikul Anam

  68

  36

  27 Toni Kuswoyo

  52

  28

  26 Sutiono

  80

  40

  88

  NO NAMA NILAI PRE TEST POST TEST

  72

  68

  44

  7 Erlin Indriani

  72

  40

  6 Dewi Yanti A

  68

  28

  5 Desi Safitri

  44

  32

  4 David Setia P

  80

  52

  3 Cristian D.P

  72

  44

  2 Agil Muarif

  56

  36

  1 Adila

  8 Febri Anto

  76

  36

  13 Marlinda

  16 Puput Setiani

  60

  44

  15 Oktafia Nurjanah

  80

  44

  14 Mei Ardi Yanto

  68

  48

  68

  9 Heru M

  40

  12 Luki Hidayat

  60

  40

  11 Jenita Mahdalena

  72

  48

  10 Irham Nur T

  56

  32

  72

  The Percentage of Students’ Competence of Experimental Class

Pre-test Post-test

No F N P Category No F N P Category

  20 25 80% Good

  25 44%

  Fair

  21

  19 25 76% Good

  22

  14

  25 56%

  Fair

  22

  23

  21

  16

  25 64%

  Bad

  23

  22 25 92% Fair

  24

  8

  25 32%

  Bad

  11

  22 25 88% Very good

  13 25 52% Fair

  19 25 76% Good

  25 40%

  Bad

  17

  15 25 60% Fair

  18

  12

  25 44%

  Fair

  18

  19

  20

  10

  25 48%

  Bad

  19

  16 25 64% Good

  20

  9

  25 36%

  Bad

  24

  25

  17

  31

  Fair

  29

  20 25 76% Good

  30

  17

  25 68%

  Good

  30

  22 25 88% Very good

  11

  11

  25 44%

  Fair

  31

  19 25 76% Good

  32

  10

  25 40%

  Bad

  32

  25 44%

  29

  9

  13 25 52% Fair

  25 36%

  Bad

  25

  20 25 80% Good

  26

  7

  25 28%

  Bad

  26

  27

  20 25 76% Good

  9

  25 36%

  Bad

  27

  17 25 68% Good

  28

  13

  25 52%

  Fair

  28

  10

  22 25 88% Very good

  1

  6

  7

  25 28%

  Bad

  5

  17 25 68% Good

  6

  10

  25 40%

  Bad

  18 25 72% Good

  18 25 72% Good

  7

  11

  25 44%

  Fair

  7

  17 25 68% Good

  8

  8

  25 32%

  5

  4

  8

  2

  9

  25 36%

  Bad

  1

  14 25 56% Fair

  2

  11

  25 44%

  Fair

  18 25 72% Good

  Fair

  3

  13

  25 52%

  Fair

  3

  20 25 80% Good

  4

  11

  25 44%

  Bad

  19 25 76% Good

  16

  20 25 80% Good

  25 48%

  Fair

  13

  17 25 68% Good

  14

  11

  25 44%

  Fair

  14

  15

  13

  11

  25 44%

  Fair

  15

  15 25 60% Fair

  16

  9

  25 36%

  Bad

  12

  17 25 68% Good

  9

  10

  8

  25 32%

  Bad

  9

  14 25 56% Fair

  10

  12

  25 48%

  Fair

  18 25 72% Good

  12

  11

  10

  25 40%

  Bad

  11

  15 25 60% Fair

  12

  10

  25 40%

  Bad

  18 25 72% Good

  

DAFTAR NILAI PRE & POST TEST KELAS 8E (CONTROL GROUP)

SMPN 2 BINANGUN TAHUN PELAJARAN 2014/2015

  21 Nur Eka Wahyuni

  24 Rivannudin Iksan

  68

  48

  23 Ragil W

  52

  48

  22 Putri Lilian

  72

  32

  68

  52

  28

  20 Nova Nur A

  32

  16

  19 Marlina

  44

  36

  18 Khoirul Anam

  64

  40

  25 Rizal S.A

  17 Irawan K

  40

  28

  32 Yuli Mafika Sari

  56

  52

  31 Tri Wahyuni

  60

  36

  30 Sutimah

  56

  29 Supiyarni

  44

  60

  36

  28 Sri Miatun

  64

  56

  27 Sri Haryanti

  56

  36

  26 Septi Maimunah

  64

  56

  48

  NO NAMA NILAI PRE TEST POST TEST

  52

  60

  44

  7 Anggi P

  68

  36

  6 Andre Setiawan

  48

  28

  5 Alif K.F

  48

  16

  4 Alya Manda R

  56

  40

  3 Ajeng Rahmaningtyas

  64

  48

  2 Aditya P.A.P

  68

  56

  1 Adie Setiawan

  8 Anjar

  40

  28

  13 Erika Andriyani

  16 Indra V

  56

  36

  15 Imam W

  60

  40

  14 Harlufi

  64

  36

  48

  9 Ardi Yuli Suryadi

  20

  12 Dwi Sakiyanti

  36

  16

  11 Dwi Agung Ari S.B

  44

  40

  10 Darwati

  40

  16

  52

  The Percentage of Students’ Competence of Control Class Pre-test Post-test

No F N P Category No F N P Category

  Fair

  25 32%

  Bad

  

21

  18

  25 72%

  Good

  22

  12

  25 48%

  Fair

  

22

  13

  25 52%

  23

  21

  12

  25 48%

  Fair

  

23

  17

  25 68%

  Good

  24

  10

  25 40%

  Bad

  

24

  13

  8

  Good

  Fair

  Good

  25 56%

  Fair

  

17

  16

  25 64%

  Good

  18

  9

  25 36%

  Bad

  

18

  16

  25 64%

  19

  25 68%

  4

  25 16%

  Very bad

  

19

  8

  25 32%

  Bad

  20

  7

  25 28%

  Bad

  

20

  17

  25 52%

  25

  17

  31

  Bad

  

29

  14

  25 56%

  Fair

  30

  9

Dokumen yang terkait

INCREASING STUDENTS’ ACHIEVEMENT IN READING COMPREHENSION OF RECOUNT TEXT THROUGH SQ4R STRATEGY AT THE SECOND YEAR OF SMPN 5 BANDAR LAMPUNG

0 7 51

INCREASING STUDENTS’ ACHIEVEMENT IN READING COMPREHENSION OF NARRATIVE TEXT THROUGH SELF- QUESTIONING STRATEGY AT THE SECOND GRADE OF SMPN 2 TERUSAN NUNYAI, LAMPUNG TENGAH

0 17 57

THE IMPLEMENTATION OF RECIPROCAL TEACHING TECHNIQUE IN NARRATIVE TEXT TO INCREASE THE STUDENTS’ READING COMPREHENSION ACHIEVEMENT AT THE SECOND GRADE OF SMAN 1 KALIREJO

0 5 67

THE EFFECT OF REAP STRATEGY TOWARD STUDENTS’ READING COMPREHENSION IN NARRATIVE TEXT OF THE SECOND YEAR AT SMAN 14 PEKANBA

3 9 13

IMPROVING STUDENTS’ READING COMPREHENSION OF NARRATIVE TEXT USING PICTURE BOOKS AS THE MEDIA

0 0 10

1 THE EFFECTIVENESS OF RECIPROCAL TEACHING IN TEACHING READING COMPREHENSION OF DESCRIPTIVE TEXT

0 0 9

THE EFFECTIVENESS OF USING ANIMATED VIDEO TO INCREASE STUDENTS’ ABILITY IN WRITING NARRATIVE TEXT

0 0 16

THE EFFECTIVENESS OF RECIPROCAL TEACHING STRATEGY TO INCREASE STUDENTS READING COMPREHENSION IN NARRATIVE TEXT THESIS

0 0 18

THE INFLUENCE OF USING QUESTIONING STRATEGY TOWARDS STUDENTS’ READING COMPREHENSION IN NARRATIVE TEXT AT THE TENTH GRADE OF THE FIRST SEMESTER OF MA YASMIDA AMBARAWA IN THE ACADEMIC YEAR OF 20172018 (A Thesis) Submitted as a Partial Fulfillment of the Req

0 0 62

THE EFFECTIVENESS OF USING SENSORY IMAGE STRATEGY TOWARDS STUDENTS’ READING COMPREHENSION IN REPORT TEXT AT THE SECOND SEMESTER OF EIGHTH GRADE AT MTS MA’ARIF SUKOHARJO PRINGSEWU IN THE ACADEMIC YEAR OF 2017/2018 - Raden Intan Repository

0 1 84