THE EFFECTIVENESS OF “THE POWER OF TWO” STRATEGY IN STUDENTS’ READING COMPREHENSION IN NARRATIVE TEXT - repository perpustakaan
APPENDIX
1
Validity, Reliability, and Item Difficult of Pre-test
Validity, Reliability, and Item Difficult of Post-test Example of validity computation
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 11
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 19 361 1 1 1 1 1 1 11
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 15 225 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 11
1 1 1 1 1 1 19 361 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 13 169 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 9 811 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
1
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 20 400 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 11
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 20 400 1 1 1 1 1 11
1 1 1 10 100 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 11
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 25 625 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 13 169 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 22 4841 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
1
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 22 484 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 11
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 22 484 1 1 1 1 1 11
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 14 196 1 1 1 1 1 1 11
1 1 1 1 1 13 169 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 11
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 18 324 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 11
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 25 6251 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
1
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 23 529 1 1 1 11
1 1 1 1 1 10 100 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 11
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 21 441 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 16 256 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 11
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 19 361 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 11 1211 1 1 1 1 1 1
1
1 1 1 1 12 144 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 11
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 17 289 1 1 1 11
1 1 1 1 1 1 11 121 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 16 256 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 13 169 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 14 1961 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
1
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 25 625 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 11
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 25 625 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 11
1 1 1 1 13 169X 30 22 27 27 23 21 25 17 22 20 18 24
23
18 22 22 16 24 19 20 19 22 23 20 21 545 10059X 2 30 22 27 27 23 21 25 17 22 20 18 24
23
18 22 22 16 24 19 20 19 22 23 20 21 ( X) 2900 484 729 729 529 441 625 289 484 400 324 576 529 324 484 484 256 576 361 400 361 484 529 400 441
Y 545 545 545 545 545 545 545 545 545 545 545 545 545 545 545 545 545 545 545 545 545 545 545 545 545 Y 210059 10059 10059 10059 10059 10059 10059 10059 10059 10059 10059 10059 10059 10059 10059 10059 10059 10059 10059 10059 10059 10059 10059 10059 10059
( Y) 2 3E+05 3E+05 3E+05 3E+05 3E+05 3E+05 3E+05 3E+05 3E+05 3E+05 3E+05 3E+053E+05
3E+05 3E+05 3E+05 3E+05 3E+05 3E+05 3E+05 3E+05 3E+05 3E+05 3E+05 3E+05XY
518 427 473 473 447 382 455 310 438 395 326 450 418 346 407 409 329 428 368 386 335 418 409 380 403
r XY 0,385 0,716 0,430 0,430 0,780 0,425 0,448 0,360 0,866 0,712 0,448 0,604 0,371 0,504 0,442 0,469 0,717 0,382 0,573 0,594 0,449 0,593 0,444 0,516 0,605 r table 0,349 0,349 0,349 0,349 0,349 0,349 0,349 0,349 0,349 0,349 0,349 0,349 0,349 0,349 0,349 0,349 0,349 0,349 0,349 0,349 0,349 0,349 0,349 0,349 0,349 Result Valid Valid Valid Valid Valid Valid Valid Valid Valid Valid Valid Valid Valid Valid Valid Valid Valid Valid Valid Valid Valid Valid Valid Valid Valid R 30 22 27 27 23 21 25 17 22 20 18 2423
18 22 22 16 24 19 20 19 22 23 20 21 N 32 32 32 32 32 32 32 32 32 32 32 3232
32 32 32 32 32 32 32 32 32 32 32 32 RN 0,938 0,688 0,844 0,844 0,719 0,656 0,781 0,531 0,688 0,625 0,563 0,750 0,719 0,563 0,688 0,688 0,500 0,750 0,594 0,625 0,594 0,688 0,719 0,625 0,656 R.N 0,938 0,688 0,844 0,844 0,719 0,656 0,781 0,531 0,688 0,625 0,563 0,750 0,719 0,563 0,688 0,688 0,500 0,750 0,594 0,625 0,594 0,688 0,719 0,625 0,656 Criteria Easy M edium Easy Easy Easy M edium Easy M ediumM ediumM ediumM edium Easy Easy M ediumM ediumM ediumM edium Easy M ediumM ediumM ediumM edium Easy M ediumM edium p 0,938 0,688 0,844 0,844 0,719 0,656 0,781 0,531 0,688 0,625 0,563 0,750 0,719 0,563 0,688 0,688 0,500 0,750 0,594 0,625 0,594 0,688 0,719 0,625 0,656 q 0,063 0,313 0,156 0,156 0,281 0,344 0,219 0,469 0,313 0,375 0,438 0,250 0,281 0,438 0,313 0,313 0,500 0,250 0,406 0,375 0,406 0,313 0,281 0,375 0,344 p q 0,059 0,215 0,132 0,132 0,202 0,226 0,171 0,249 0,215 0,234 0,246 0,188 0,202 0,246 0,215 0,215 0,250 0,188 0,241 0,234 0,241 0,215 0,202 0,234 0,226 pq 5,177 Vt 24,280 k Result Reliable 25 r11 0,819 rtable 0,349 8 9 10 3 4 5 6 7 Y 2 2 Responden Y 1 Number of Items Number of Items Number of Items 11 12 13 23 18 21 22 19 20 30 31 14 Re lia bi lit y 27 28 29 32 V al idi ty Fa ci lit y V al ue 26 15 24 25 16 17 THE EFFECTIVENESS OF ...,SUTENG SULISTIANI, PBI FKIP, UMP 2015Validity, Re liability, and Facility Value of Pre Te s t 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 11
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 19 361 1 1 1 1 1 1 11
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 15 225 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 11
1 1 1 1 1 1 19 361 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 13 1691 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 9 81 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
1
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 20 400 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 11
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 20 400 1 1 1 1 1 11
1 1 1 10 100 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 11
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 25 625 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 13 169 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 22 484 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 11
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 22 4841 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
1
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 22 484 1 1 1 1 1 11
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 14 196 1 1 1 1 1 1 11
1 1 1 1 1 13 169 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 11
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 18 324 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 11
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 25 625 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 11
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 23 529 1 1 1 11
1 1 1 1 1 10 100 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 11
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 21 4411 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 16 256 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
1
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 19 361 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 11 121 1 1 1 1 1 1 11
1 1 1 1 12 144 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 11
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 17 289 1 1 1 11
1 1 1 1 1 1 11 121 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 16 256 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 13 1691 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 14 196 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
1
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 25 625 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 11
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 25 625 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 11
1 1 1 1 13 169 X 30 22 27 27 23 21 25 17 22 20 18 2423
18 22 22 16 24 19 20 19 22 23 20 21 545 10059 X 2 30 22 27 27 23 21 25 17 22 20 18 2423
18 22 22 16 24 19 20 19 22 23 20 21 ( X) Y 545 545 545 545 545 545 545 545 545 545 545 545 545 545 545 545 545 545 545 545 545 545 545 545 545 2900 484 729 729 529 441 625 289 484 400 324 576 529 324 484 484 256 576 361 400 361 484 529 400 441
Y ( Y) 210059 10059 10059 10059 10059 10059 10059 10059 10059 10059 10059 10059 10059 10059 10059 10059 10059 10059 10059 10059 10059 10059 10059 10059 10059
2 3E+05 3E+05 3E+05 3E+05 3E+05 3E+05 3E+05 3E+05 3E+05 3E+05 3E+05 3E+053E+05
3E+05 3E+05 3E+05 3E+05 3E+05 3E+05 3E+05 3E+05 3E+05 3E+05 3E+05 3E+05 XY518 427 473 473 447 382 455 310 438 395 326 450 418 346 407 409 329 428 368 386 335 418 409 380 403
r XY0,385 0,716 0,430 0,430 0,780 0,425 0,448 0,360 0,866 0,712 0,448 0,604 0,371 0,504 0,442 0,469 0,717 0,382 0,573 0,594 0,449 0,593 0,444 0,516 0,605
r table 0,349 0,349 0,349 0,349 0,349 0,349 0,349 0,349 0,349 0,349 0,349 0,349 0,349 0,349 0,349 0,349 0,349 0,349 0,349 0,349 0,349 0,349 0,349 0,349 0,349 Result Valid Valid Valid Valid Valid Valid Valid Valid Valid Valid Valid Valid Valid Valid Valid Valid Valid Valid Valid Valid Valid Valid Valid Valid Valid R 30 22 27 27 23 21 25 17 22 20 18 2423
18 22 22 16 24 19 20 19 22 23 20 21 N 32 32 32 32 32 32 32 32 32 32 32 3232
32 32 32 32 32 32 32 32 32 32 32 32 RN 0,938 0,688 0,844 0,844 0,719 0,656 0,781 0,531 0,688 0,625 0,563 0,750 0,719 0,563 0,688 0,688 0,500 0,750 0,594 0,625 0,594 0,688 0,719 0,625 0,656 R.N 0,938 0,688 0,844 0,844 0,719 0,656 0,781 0,531 0,688 0,625 0,563 0,750 0,719 0,563 0,688 0,688 0,500 0,750 0,594 0,625 0,594 0,688 0,719 0,625 0,656 Criteria Easy M edium Easy Easy Easy M edium Easy M ediumM ediumM ediumM edium Easy Easy M ediumM ediumM ediumM edium Easy M ediumM ediumM ediumM edium Easy M ediumM edium p 0,938 0,688 0,844 0,844 0,719 0,656 0,781 0,531 0,688 0,625 0,563 0,750 0,719 0,563 0,688 0,688 0,500 0,750 0,594 0,625 0,594 0,688 0,719 0,625 0,656 q 0,063 0,313 0,156 0,156 0,281 0,344 0,219 0,469 0,313 0,375 0,438 0,250 0,281 0,438 0,313 0,313 0,500 0,250 0,406 0,375 0,406 0,313 0,281 0,375 0,344 p q 0,059 0,215 0,132 0,132 0,202 0,226 0,171 0,249 0,215 0,234 0,246 0,188 0,202 0,246 0,215 0,215 0,250 0,188 0,241 0,234 0,241 0,215 0,202 0,234 0,226 p q 5,177 Vt 24,280 k Result Reliable 25 r11 0,819 rtable 0,349 8 9 10 3 4 5 6 7 Y 2 2 Responden Y 1 Number of Items Number of Items Number of Items 11 12 13 23 18 21 22 19 20 30 31 14 Re lia bi lit y 27 28 29 Fa 32 V ali di ty cil ity V alue 26 15 24 25 16 17 THE EFFECTIVENESS OF ...,SUTENG SULISTIANI, PBI FKIP, UMP 2015Computation of t-test
Data: Mx =
= = 29.125 =
( )
= 29712
( )
= 29712 = 29712
My = = = 18.375 =
( )
= 13520
( )
= 13520 = 13520 10804.5 = 2715.5
- – 27144.5 = 2567.5
- – √(
t =
)( ) t =
√( )( ) =
√( )( )
=
√( )( )
=
√
= = 4.33
d.f = Nx
Ny – = 32
32
- – 2 = 62
Calculation of Validity Pretest: r xy
N = 32 xy = 427 = 22 x = 545 y
2
= 22 x
2
= 484 ( x)
2
= 10059 y
2
= 297025 ( y)
( ) ( )
√* ( ) ( ) ( ) ( )
√* ( ) ( ( ) √( ) ( )
√( ) ( ) √
= 0.716
r > r xy table = 0.716 > 0.349 = Valid.
Calculation of Validity Posttest: r xy
N = 32 xy = 531 = 28 x = 563 y
2
= 28 x
2
= 784 ( x)
2
= 11041 y
2
= 316969 ( y)
( ) ( )
√* ( ) ( ) ( ) ( )
√* ( ) ( ( ) √( ) ( ) √( ) ( )
√
= 0.609 r > r xy table = 0.609 > 0.349 = Valid.
Calculation of Reliability Pretest: r
11
2
= 10059 y
2
= 297025 ( y) N = 32
( )
Vt =
=
Vt
=
Vt
=
Vt 24.280 k = 25 Vt = 24.280 Σpq
= ( ) ( )
= ( ) ( )
= ( ) ( )
1.0411 x 0.786
= = 0.819 r > r 11 table = 0.819 > 0.349 = Reliable
Calculation of Reliability Posttest: r
11
2
= 11041 y
2
= 316969 ( y) N = 32
( )
Vt =
=
Vt
=
Vt
=
Vt
=
Vt
35.49 k = 25 Vt = 35.49 Σpq
= ( ) ( )
= ( ) ( )
= ( ) ( )
1.0417 x 0.856
=
0.891
= r > r 11 table = 0.891 > 0.349 = Reliable
Facility Value of Pretest
Criteria :- 0.1-0.30 = difficult
- 0.31-0,70 = medium
- 0.71-1 = easy
( u r r t s r) ( tu ts t t t st)
0.938 (easy)
= = Facility Value of Posttest
( u r r t s r) ( tu ts t t t st)
0.875 (easy)
= =
The students ’ competency Categories: 81-100% of the correct answers = very good 61-80% of the correct answer = good 41-60% of the correct answer = fair 21-40% of the correct answer = bad 0-20% of the correct answer = very bad 1.
Experimental class a. pre test
P = 100%
x
( r qu r t s r) (t t t s)
=
( ) b.
post test
P = x 100% =
( r)
2. control class a. pre test
P x 100%
=
= ( r) b.
post test
P x 100% =
( )
APPENDIX 2 r-table t-table T-table α untuk uji dua pihak (two tail tes)
0.50
0.20
0.10
0.05
0.02
0.01 α untuk uji satu pihak (one tail tes)
DF
0.25
0.10 0.05 0.025 0.01 0.005 56 0.679 1,297 1,673 2,003 2,395 2,667 57 0.679 1,297 1,672 2,002 2,394 2,665 58 0.679 1,296 1,672 2,002 2,392 2,663 59 0.679 1,296 1,671 2,001 2,391 2,662 60 0.679 1,296 1,671 2,000 2,390 2,660 61 0.679 1,296 1,670 2,000 2,389 2,659 62 0.678 1,295
1,670
1,999 2,388 2,657 63 0.678 1,295 1,669 1,998 2,387 2,656 64 0.678 1,295 1,669 1,998 2,386 2,655 65 0.678 1,295 1,669 1,997 2,385 2,654 66 0.678 1,295 1,668 1,997 2,384 2,652 67 0.678 1,294 1,668 1,996 2,383 2,651 68 0.678 1,294 1,668 1,995 2,382 2,650 69 0.678 1,294 1,667 1,995 2,382 2,949 70 0.678 1,294 1,667 1,994 2,381 2,648 71 0.678 1,294 1,667 1,994 2,380 2,647 72 0.678 1,293 1,666 1,993 2,379 2,646 73 0.678 1,293 1,666 1,993 2,379 2,645 74 0.678 1,293 1,666 1,993 2,378 2,644 75 0.678 1,293 1,665 1,992 2,377 2,643 76 0.678 1,293 1,665 1,992 2,376 2,642 77 0.678 1,293 1,665 1,992 2,376 2,641 78 0.678 1,292 1,665 1,992 2,375 2,640 79 0.678 1,292 1,664 1,990 2,374 2,640 80 0.678 1,292 1,664 1,990 2,374 2,639 r-table N
Sig. Level N
32
0.59 43 0.301 0.389 600 0.08 0.105 19 0.456 0.575 44 0.297 0.384 700 0.074 0.097 20 0.444 0.561 45 0.294 0.38 800 0.07 0.091 21 0.438 0.549 46 0.291 0.376 900 0.065 0.086 22 0.423 0.537 47 0.288 0.372 1000 0.062 0.081 23 0.413 0.526 48 0.284 0.368 24 0.404 0.515 49 0.281 0.368 25 0.396 0.505 50 0.279 0.361 26 0.388 0.496 55 0.266 0.345 27 0.381 0.487 60 0.254
0.21 13 0.553 0.684 38 0.32 0.413 175 0.148 0.194 14 0.532 0.661 39 0.316 0.408 200 0.138 0.181 15 0.514 0.641 40 0.312 0.403 300 0.113 0.148 16 0.497 0.623 41 0.308 0.398 400 0.098 0.128 17 0.482 0.606 42 0.304 0.393 500 0.088 0.115 18 0.458
0.23 12 0.576 0.708 37 0.325 0.418 150 0.159
0.27 9 0.666 0.798 34 0.339 0.436 95 0.202 0.263 10 0.632 0.765 35 0.334 0.43 100 0.195 0.256 11 0.602 0.735 36 0.329 0.424 125 0.176
0.449 85 0.213 0.278 8 0.707 0.834 33 0.344 0.442 90 0.207
0.349
80 0.22 0.286 7 0.754 0.874
Sig. Level N
0.47 70 0.235 0.306 5 0.878 0.959 30 0.361 0.463 75 0.227 0.296 6 0.811 0.917 31 0.355 0.456
0.99 29 0.366
0.95
4
28 0.374 0.478 65 0.244 0.317
Sig. Level 5% 1% 5% 1% 5% 1% 3 0.997 0.999
0.33
APPENDIX 3 Students’ score in experimental class
The individual competence of pre-test and post-test of experimental
class Students’ score in control class The individual competence of pre-test and post-test of control class
DAFTAR NILAI PRE & POST TEST KELAS 8A (EXPERIMENTAL
GROUP)
SMPN 2 BINANGUN TAHUN PELAJARAN 2014/2015
21 Septi Kusuma Ningrum
24 Sugeng Priono
92
64
23 Sri Wahyuni
80
56
22 Sri Astuti
76
44
88
52
36
20 Rusminah
64
40
19 Romahtul Umiyah
76
48
18 Ridwan Syururi
60
32
25 Suguanto
17 Retno Asih Amelia
44
40
32 Wulan Saputri
76
44
31 Viki Novianto
88
68
30 Tri Tuandar
76
29 Triana Dea
36
76
52
28 Torikul Anam
68
36
27 Toni Kuswoyo
52
28
26 Sutiono
80
40
88
NO NAMA NILAI PRE TEST POST TEST
72
68
44
7 Erlin Indriani
72
40
6 Dewi Yanti A
68
28
5 Desi Safitri
44
32
4 David Setia P
80
52
3 Cristian D.P
72
44
2 Agil Muarif
56
36
1 Adila
8 Febri Anto
76
36
13 Marlinda
16 Puput Setiani
60
44
15 Oktafia Nurjanah
80
44
14 Mei Ardi Yanto
68
48
68
9 Heru M
40
12 Luki Hidayat
60
40
11 Jenita Mahdalena
72
48
10 Irham Nur T
56
32
72
The Percentage of Students’ Competence of Experimental Class
Pre-test Post-test
No F N P Category No F N P Category
20 25 80% Good
25 44%
Fair
21
19 25 76% Good
22
14
25 56%
Fair
22
23
21
16
25 64%
Bad
23
22 25 92% Fair
24
8
25 32%
Bad
11
22 25 88% Very good
13 25 52% Fair
19 25 76% Good
25 40%
Bad
17
15 25 60% Fair
18
12
25 44%
Fair
18
19
20
10
25 48%
Bad
19
16 25 64% Good
20
9
25 36%
Bad
24
25
17
31
Fair
29
20 25 76% Good
30
17
25 68%
Good
30
22 25 88% Very good
11
11
25 44%
Fair
31
19 25 76% Good
32
10
25 40%
Bad
32
25 44%
29
9
13 25 52% Fair
25 36%
Bad
25
20 25 80% Good
26
7
25 28%
Bad
26
27
20 25 76% Good
9
25 36%
Bad
27
17 25 68% Good
28
13
25 52%
Fair
28
10
22 25 88% Very good
1
6
7
25 28%
Bad
5
17 25 68% Good
6
10
25 40%
Bad
18 25 72% Good
18 25 72% Good
7
11
25 44%
Fair
7
17 25 68% Good
8
8
25 32%
5
4
8
2
9
25 36%
Bad
1
14 25 56% Fair
2
11
25 44%
Fair
18 25 72% Good
Fair
3
13
25 52%
Fair
3
20 25 80% Good
4
11
25 44%
Bad
19 25 76% Good
16
20 25 80% Good
25 48%
Fair
13
17 25 68% Good
14
11
25 44%
Fair
14
15
13
11
25 44%
Fair
15
15 25 60% Fair
16
9
25 36%
Bad
12
17 25 68% Good
9
10
8
25 32%
Bad
9
14 25 56% Fair
10
12
25 48%
Fair
18 25 72% Good
12
11
10
25 40%
Bad
11
15 25 60% Fair
12
10
25 40%
Bad
18 25 72% Good
DAFTAR NILAI PRE & POST TEST KELAS 8E (CONTROL GROUP)
SMPN 2 BINANGUN TAHUN PELAJARAN 2014/2015
21 Nur Eka Wahyuni
24 Rivannudin Iksan
68
48
23 Ragil W
52
48
22 Putri Lilian
72
32
68
52
28
20 Nova Nur A
32
16
19 Marlina
44
36
18 Khoirul Anam
64
40
25 Rizal S.A
17 Irawan K
40
28
32 Yuli Mafika Sari
56
52
31 Tri Wahyuni
60
36
30 Sutimah
56
29 Supiyarni
44
60
36
28 Sri Miatun
64
56
27 Sri Haryanti
56
36
26 Septi Maimunah
64
56
48
NO NAMA NILAI PRE TEST POST TEST
52
60
44
7 Anggi P
68
36
6 Andre Setiawan
48
28
5 Alif K.F
48
16
4 Alya Manda R
56
40
3 Ajeng Rahmaningtyas
64
48
2 Aditya P.A.P
68
56
1 Adie Setiawan
8 Anjar
40
28
13 Erika Andriyani
16 Indra V
56
36
15 Imam W
60
40
14 Harlufi
64
36
48
9 Ardi Yuli Suryadi
20
12 Dwi Sakiyanti
36
16
11 Dwi Agung Ari S.B
44
40
10 Darwati
40
16
52
The Percentage of Students’ Competence of Control Class Pre-test Post-test
No F N P Category No F N P Category
Fair
25 32%
Bad
21
18
25 72%
Good
22
12
25 48%
Fair
22
13
25 52%
23
21
12
25 48%
Fair
23
17
25 68%
Good
24
10
25 40%
Bad
24
13
8
Good
Fair
Good
25 56%
Fair
17
16
25 64%
Good
18
9
25 36%
Bad
18
16
25 64%
19
25 68%
4
25 16%
Very bad
19
8
25 32%
Bad
20
7
25 28%
Bad
20
17
25 52%
25
17
31
Bad
29
14
25 56%
Fair
30
9