Stigmatization and stigma resistance in Paulo Coelho`s the witch of portobello.

(1)

x i

A

B

S

T

R

A

C

T

o t e S s u n a ir d

A Anggoro(2016 .) S itgma itza itonandS itgmaResistanceinPaulo s o h l e o

C The Wtich o f Portobello. Yogyakatra : Engilsh Language Studies , . y ti s r e v i n U a m r a h D a t a n a S , y d u t S e t a u d a r G s ' o h l e o C o l u a P s e s u y d u t s s i h

T TheWticho fPo trobellotor evea lCoelho' s s

s e

m age on sitgmaitzed identtiy .In thi sparitcula rwork ,Coelho ciritcize sthe o h l e o C . d e t n a r g r o f e k a t e l p o e p y n a m t a h t y t e i c o s s y a d a w o n n i s n o it a z it a m g it s y b y t e i c o s d e z il a n i g r a m e h t o t n o it a z it a m g it s h c u s f o s t c e f f e e h t d a b w o h s li e v n u a h c n i a m e h t g n it t e

s racte r being constanlty sitgmaitzed fo r he r idenitites , f o e u s s i e h t n o e g a s s e m s ' o h l e o C p s a r g o t r e d r o n I . y ti t n e d i y s p y G e h t y ll a i c e p s e s ' o h l e o C g n it e r p r e t n i n i h c r a e s e r y r a r b il f o d o h t e m e h t d e y o l p m e I , n o it a z it a m g it s o ll e b o t r o P f o h c ti W e h

T by presenitng the sitgmaitzaiton s received by the .t c a e r y e h t w o h d n a s r e t c a r a h c s ' o h l e o C n o n o it a z it a m g it s f o s e u s s i e h t h ti w s l a e d s i s e h t s i h

T TheWticho f

o ll e b o t r o

P a swel last hes oluitonofs uchs itgmaitzaiton sass eeni nt hecharacters ' n il a e d n I . e c n a t s i s e

r gwtihsuchi ssues ,theinterpretaitonoft het exti sessenital.I n g n it e r p r e t n

i The Wtich o f Portobello , thi s study employ s Pau l Ricoue'r s s a n o i c i p s u s f o s c it u e n e m r e h d e lt it h c a o r p p a l a c i h p o s o li h

p t heframeworkoft hi s

.s i s e h

t Addiitonally ,Erving Goffman’ sconcep tof sitgma and David Mayal’l s f o t p e c n o

c Gypsy idenitites are employed to suppor tthe arguments. Ricouer’ s l a c it ir c f o l e d o m a s a o s l a t u b k r o w e m a r f e h t s a y l n o t o n s t c a s c it u e n e m r e h y d u t s s i h t n e p r a h s o t g n i k n i h

t .Meanwhlie ,Goffman and Mayal’l sconcept sare n o i c i p s u s e h t e t a r o b a l e d n a y fi t n e d i o t d e s

u . Ther esistance soft hecharacter sare e u s s i e h t e m o c r e v o o t n o it u l o s s ' o h l e o C t n e s e r p o t r e d r o n i d e z y l a n a r e h tr u f o s l a . n o it a z it a m g it s f o o h l e o C y b d e y a rt r o p s i o h w , a n e h t A t a h t s w o h s y d u t s s i h

T inTheWticho f

o ll e b o t r o

P ,constan ltyexpe irencess itgmaitzaitonsi nanurbanwo lrd .Athenadoe s e h t n i s r e t c a r a h c r e h t o y n a M . fl e s r e h y b l l a a m g it s e h t r a e b o t e v a h s y a w l a t o n n o it a z it a m g it s e s e h T . s y a w s u o ir a v n i r e h d n e f e d y r o t

s expeirences ,along wtih

y ti t n e d i d e z it a m g it s e t a m it l u r e h o t r e h d a e l , s ti a rt d n a s e it il i b a l a u s u n u r e

h — a

h c ti

w .Fu trhermore ,Athena resist sthe sitgmaitzaiton sshe receive sin va irou s .

s y a

w Theser esistance sareconstanltychanging ,whichshowAthena’ swisdomi n s e r a m g it s r e

h istance .Thi swisdom in resisitng sitgma thus become Coelho' s t e g a s s e

m ot hevicitm sofs itgmaitzaiton.I nt heend ,thist hesi sarguest hatt hrough

o ll e b o t r o P f o h c ti W e h

T Coelho expect shi sreaders to develop sympathy ast he m g it s e h t d n e f e d o t p e t s t s ri

f aitzedi ndividual .s

f o e m e h t e h t n o e r o m e r o l p x e n a c s r e h c r a e s e r e r u t u f , y ll a n i F s a l l e w s a s k r o w s ' o h l e o C r e h t o n a n i n o it a z il a n i g r a

m deconsrtuctsthemi nordert o

s u h t d n a n e p p a h n a c n o it a z il a n i g r a m h c u s w o h n o r e w s n a t e

g provide et h b est

. n o it u l o s o w y e


(2)

x

K

A

R

T

S

B

A

1 0 2 ( o r o g g n A o t e S s u n a ir d

A 6 .) S itgma itza itonandS itgmaResistanceinPaulo s

o h l e o

C TheWticho fPortobello. Yogyakatra :Magiste rKaijan BahasaI ngg irs , .

a m r a h D a t a n a S s a ti s r e v i n U , a n a jr a s a c s a P m a r g o r P

ti l e n e

P ian i n imenggunakan nove lPaulo Coelho yang bejrudu lTheWtich o

ll e b o t r o P f

o untuk mengungkap pesan Coelho dalam menyikap iidenttia syang m

a l a D . n a k a m g it s i

d novelini ,Coelhomengk irits ipembe iransitgmayangbanyak r

a j a w p a g g n a i

d sampa i saa t ini . Coelho menunjukkan buruknya efek dar i t

a k a r a y s a m a d a p e k a m g it s n a ir e b m e

p terutama kaum margina l dengan cara s u r e n e m s u r e t a i d a n a m i d i s i s o p m a l a d a y n a m a t u r e t k a r a k n a k k a t e l e m

i a g a b e s i k il i m a i d g n a y s a ti t n e d i a n e r a k n a k a m g it s i

d Gypsy .Untuk menangkap

o h l e o C n a s e

p dalampermasalahans itgmasisas,is ayamenggunakanmetodekaijan n

a k ri s f a n e m m a l a d a k a t s u

p nove lini dengan menunjukkan sitgmaitsas iyang r

e t k a r a k i m a l a i

d -karakternyadanbagaimanamerekabereaks.i m

e m i n i s i s e

T baha spermasalahan sitgmasisas idengan solusinya diilha t ir

a

d pelrawanan karakter-karakte rd idalam novel .Dalam menginterpretas i The o

ll e b o tr o P f o h c ti

W ,thesi sin imenggunakan pendekatan flioso if skarya Pau l l

u d u jr e b r e u o c i

R hermeneuitc so f suspicion sebaga ikerangka berpiki rdalam i

n i s i s e h

t . eS baga itambahan ,konsep sitgma karya Erving Goffman dan konsep s

a ti t n e d i g n a t n e t l l a y a M d i v a

D Gypsy digunakan sebaga ipendukung argumen . i

r o e

T hermeneu itcsRicoue rberperan sebaga ikerangkaberpikri nd a jugasebaga i m

a j a tr e p m e m k u t n u s it ir k n a ri k i m e p l e d o

m peneilitan .Konsep Goffman dan

n a k s a l e j n e m n a d i s a k if it n e d i g n e m k u t n u n a k a n u g i d l l a y a

M suspicion tersebut .

n a s e p n a k k u j n u n e m a k g n a r m a l a d a s il a n a i d a g u j r e t k a r a k a r a p i r a d n a n a w a lr e P

i s a s it a m g it s n a h a l a s a m r e p i s a t a g n e m k u t n u o h l e o

C .

k u j n u n e m i n i n a it il e n e

P kan bahwa Athena yang secara teru smeneru s a

m g it s g n u g g n a n e m m a l a d n a ir i d n e s u l a l e s k a d it i s a s it a m g it s i m a l a g n e

m -sitgma

t u b e s r e

t karena karakte rlain membelanya dengan berbaga icara .Pengalaman -t

u b e s r e t i s a s it a m g it s n a m a l a g n e

p , bersama dengan kemampuan sfia t dan a

s a i b k a d it g n a y a n e h t A n a u p m a m e

k ,membawanya pada identtia syang pailng a

m g it s t a p a d n e m k a y n a

b —seorang wtich .Athena melawan sitgmaitsas itersebu t a

r a c i a g a b r e b n a g n e

d . Cara-cara yang selalu berubah in i menunjukkan a

n a s k a ji b e K . a n e h t A n a a n a s k a ji b e

k a n tersebu tmenjad ipesan Coelho untuk para i

s a s it a m g it s n a b r o

k .Akhrinya ,thesisi n iberpendapa tbahwamelalu iTheWtich o f o

ll e b o t r o

P Coelho menginginkan pembacanya untuk bersimpaitsebagail angkah i

s a s it a m g it s n a b r o k p a it e s a l e b m e m k u t n u l a w

a .

t a k r i h k

A a ,parapenelti id imasayang akan datang dapa tmengeksploras i a

m e

t -temamarginailsas idalamkarya-karyaCoelho yangl ainsetramembedahnya t a p a d t u b e s r e t i s a s il a n i g r a m a n a m i a g a b s a t a n a b a w a j h e l o r e p m e m a k g n a r m a l a d

n a d i d a jr e

t membe irkansolus iyangt erbai k. i

c n u k a t a


(3)

D

N

A

N

O

I

T

A

Z

I

T

A

M

G

I

T

S

S

T

I

G

M

A

R

E

S

I

S

T

A

N

C

E

I

N

P

A

U

L

O

S

O

H

L

E

O

C

T

H

E

W

I

T

C

H

O

F

P

O

R

T

O

B

E

L

L

O

S I S E H T A s

a d e t n e s e r

P Parita lFul ifllmen toft heRequ riements f

o e e r g e D e h t r o f

). m u H . M ( a r o i n a m u H r e t s i g a M

n i

s e i d u t S e g a u g n a L h s il g n E

by

o r o g g n A o t e S s u n a ir d A

Studen tNumber :12633204 3

F O M A R G O R P E T A U D A R G E H

T ENGLISHLANGUAGESTUDIES

Y T I S R E V I N U A M R A H D A T A N A S

A T R A K A Y G O Y

1 0 2 6


(4)

i

S

O

H

L

E

O

C

T

H

E

W

I

T

C

H

O

F

P

O

R

T

O

B

E

L

L

O

S I S E H T A s

a d e t n e s e r

P Parita lFul ifllmen toft heRequ riements f

o e e r g e D e h t r o f

). m u H . M ( a r o i n a m u H r e t s i g a M

n i

s e i d u t S e g a u g n a L h s il g n E

by

o r o g g n A o t e S s u n a ir d A

Studen tNumber :12633204 3

F O M A R G O R P E T A U D A R G E H

T ENGLISHLANGUAGESTUDIES

Y T I S R E V I N U A M R A H D A T A N A S

A T R A K A Y G O Y

1 0 2 6


(5)

(6)

ii i


(7)

v i

A

N

I

G

I

R

O

F

O

T

N

E

M

E

T

A

T

S

L

I

T

Y

e c o t s i s i h

T trfiyt ha tallt hei deas ,phrases ,ands entences ,unles sotherwise l l u f e h t s d n a t s r e d n u r e ti r w e h T . r e ti r w s i s e h t e h t f o s e c n e t n e s , s a e d i e h t e r a , d e t a t s

, a e d i s ’ e s l e y d o b e m o s k o o t e h f i n o it a ll e c n a c e e r g e d g n i d u l c n i s e c n e u q e s n o c

u o h ti w e c n e t n e s r o , e s a r h

p taproperr eference .

, a tr a k a y g o

Y March 12 6 0

o r o g g n A o t e S s u n a ir d A


(8)

v

E

P

N

A

A

T

A

Y

N

R

E

P

R

A

B

M

E

L

R

S

E

T

U

J

U

A

N

P

U

B

L

I

K

A

S

I

K

K

U

T

N

U

H

A

I

M

L

I

A

Y

R

A

K

E

P

E

N

T

I

N

G

A

N

A

K

A

D

E

M

I

S

, a m r a h D a t a n a S s a ti s r e v i n U a w s i s a h a m a y a s ,i n i h a w a b i d n a g n a t a d n a tr e b g n a Y

a m a

N :Ad iranu sSetoAnggoro a

w s i s a h a M r o m o

N : 126332043

n a a k a t s u p r e P a d a p e k n a k ir e b m e m a y a s , n a u h a t e g n e p u m li n a g n a b m e k r e p i m e D

a n a S s a ti s r e v i n

U t aDharmakarya limiahs ayayangbejrudu :l d

n a n o it a z it a m g it

S S itgmaResistanceinPauloCoelho’ sTheWticho f o

ll e b o t r o P

k a h n a k ir e b m e m a y a s n a i k i m e d n a g n e D . n a k u lr e p i d g n a y t a k g n a r e p a tr e s e b

a n a S s a ti s r e v i n U n a a k a t s u p r e P a d a p e

k t aDharmauntukmenyimpan ,mengailhkan

, a t a d n a l a k g n a p k u t n e b m a l a d a y n a l o l e g n e m , n i a l a i d e m m a l a d

k il b u p m e m n a d , s a t a b r e t a r a c e s a y n n a k i s u b ir t s i d n e

m asikannya d iinterne tatau

a y a s i r a d n i z i a t n i m e m u lr e p a p n a t s i m e d a k a n a g n it n e p e k k u t n u n i a l a i d e m

a y a s a m a n n a k m u t n a c n e m p a t e t a m a l e s a y a s a d a p e k i tl a y o r n a k ir e b m e m n u p u a m

.s il u n e p i a g a b e s

. a y n r a n e b e s n a g n e d t a u b a y a s i n i n a a t a y n r e p n a i k i m e D

a k a y g o

Y tra ,3 0Maret2016

o r o g g n A o t e S s u n a ir d A


(9)

i v

S

T

N

E

M

E

G

D

E

L

W

O

N

K

C

A

e h t n i e m d e tr o p p u s s a h o h w e n o y r e v e o t s e o g e d u ti t a r g t s e g g i b y M

, s a l a d n A a r a it u M . r D r o s i v d a s i s e h t y m y ll a i c e p s e , s i s e h t s i h t g n i h s i n if f o s s e c o r p

h t e m d e p l e h e c n a d i u g s s e l d n e s i H . D T S , .J .

S roughoutt hewholeproces soft hi s

. g n it ir w s i s e h t

s e i d u t S e g a u g n a L h s il g n E n i s r e r u t c e l e h t ll a o t s e o g e d u ti t a r g e r e c n i s y M

. A . M , . S . M , i w e D a ti v o N . r D , . D . h P , o tr a k u M . X . F y ll a i c e p s e , t n e m tr a p e D

. A . M , i d a w s i S . X . F . r D , . A . M , o k o m t a ji w D . B . B . r D , ) s n o H

( ,Albetru sBagu s

i d k a B . r D . f o r P e t a l e h t d n a , . D . h P , o t o w r a S s u l u a P , . D . h P , .J . S , a n a s k a L

. y d u t s y m n o t o l a e t u b ir t n o c s tr o p p u s l a n o i s s e f o r p r i e h T . U . S , o t n a m e o S

o t e d u ti t a r g y m s s e r p x e o t e k il d l u o w

I MbakMarn iandothe rmember so f

r o f t a ir a t e r c e s I B

K thei rhelp and suppo tr .In addiiton ,my grattiudealso goest o , s il E k a b M , ir a H k a b M , i x a M , e r B : 2 1 0 2 h c t a b s s a l c e r u t a r e ti L n i s e t a m s s a l c y m

d n a , w e r d n A , a ti S , a s i

G PakArfi .

d n a a j a tr a H . S . B : s t n e r a p y m o t e d u ti t a r g y m w o h s o t e k il o s l a d l u o w I T a r f

A ien Sotyaningrum . Thei r suppor t and moitvaiton have helped me in n i p l e h r e h r o f y t n a i v o N a ll e ir b a G o t s e o g k n a h t l a n if y M . y d u t s y m g n i h s i n if

.s i s e h t s i h t g n i h s i n if f o s s e c o r p e h t g n ir u d s e u s s i l a c i n h c e t y n a m


(10)

ii v

S T N E T N O C F O E L B A T

E G A P E L T I

T .................................................................................................. i .... L

A V O R P P

A PAGE ........................................................................................... ii ACCEPTANCEPAGE.......................................................................................i.ii

Y T I L A N I G I R O F O T N E M E T A T

S ................................................................. iv .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. S T N E M E G D E L W O N K C

A vi

O C F O E L B A

T NTENTS....................................................................................vii T

C A R T S B

A .................................................................................................. x....i K

A R T S B

A .......................................................................................................... x

I R E T P A H

C INTRODUCTION ....................................................................... 1 1 .Backgroundoft heStudy ... 1 2 .Signiifcanceoft heStudy ... 5 3 .ResearchQuesitons ... 11 4 .Scopeoft heStudy ... 21 5 .ResearchMethod ... 13 6 .Chapters Outilne ... 14

I I R E T P A H

C LITERATUREREVIEW ........................................................ 16 1 .Reviewo fRelatedStudies... 16 2 .Theoreitca lFramework ... 21

.

1 Pau lRicouer’ sConcep to fSuspicion ... 21 .

2 ErvingGoffman’ sConcep to fSitgma ... 26 .

3 DavidMayal’l sConcep tofGypsyI dent y ti ... 03 E

F I L S A N E H T A N I S N G I S E H T I I I R E T P A H

C ........................................ 36 e

h T .

1 DeadWtich ... 37 .

2 TheOirginoft heWtich ... 04 .

3 TheLegacyoftheWtich ... 68 E

C N A T S I S E R S A N E H T A V I R E T P A H

C .................................................... 76 .

1 TheEalryResistance... 76 .

2 SitgmaResistancet hroughGeneraitons... 82 .

3 SitgmaResistancea saWtich ... 84 .


(11)

ii i v V

R E T P A H

C CONCLUSION......................................................................... 93 .

1 Achievemen tandSigni ifcance ... 93 .

2 Relevance ... 98 Y

H P A R G O I L B I

B .......................................................................................... 01 2 ..

.. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. X I D N E P P

A .......................105

1 x i d n e p p

A :Biographyo fPauloCoelho... ... 106 .. 2

x i d n e p p


(12)

x i

A

B

S

T

R

A

C

T

o t e S s u n a ir d

A Anggoro(2016 .) S itgma itza itonandS itgmaResistanceinPaulo s o h l e o

C The Wtich o f Portobello. Yogyakatra : Engilsh Language Studies , . y ti s r e v i n U a m r a h D a t a n a S , y d u t S e t a u d a r G s ' o h l e o C o l u a P s e s u y d u t s s i h

T TheWticho fPo trobellotor evea lCoelho' s s

s e

m age on sitgmaitzed identtiy .In thi sparitcula rwork ,Coelho ciritcize sthe o h l e o C . d e t n a r g r o f e k a t e l p o e p y n a m t a h t y t e i c o s s y a d a w o n n i s n o it a z it a m g it s y b y t e i c o s d e z il a n i g r a m e h t o t n o it a z it a m g it s h c u s f o s t c e f f e e h t d a b w o h s li e v n u a h c n i a m e h t g n it t e

s racte r being constanlty sitgmaitzed fo r he r idenitites , f o e u s s i e h t n o e g a s s e m s ' o h l e o C p s a r g o t r e d r o n I . y ti t n e d i y s p y G e h t y ll a i c e p s e s ' o h l e o C g n it e r p r e t n i n i h c r a e s e r y r a r b il f o d o h t e m e h t d e y o l p m e I , n o it a z it a m g it s o ll e b o t r o P f o h c ti W e h

T by presenitng the sitgmaitzaiton s received by the .t c a e r y e h t w o h d n a s r e t c a r a h c s ' o h l e o C n o n o it a z it a m g it s f o s e u s s i e h t h ti w s l a e d s i s e h t s i h

T TheWticho f

o ll e b o t r o

P a swel last hes oluitonofs uchs itgmaitzaiton sass eeni nt hecharacters ' n il a e d n I . e c n a t s i s e

r gwtihsuchi ssues ,theinterpretaitonoft het exti sessenital.I n g n it e r p r e t n

i The Wtich o f Portobello , thi s study employ s Pau l Ricoue'r s s a n o i c i p s u s f o s c it u e n e m r e h d e lt it h c a o r p p a l a c i h p o s o li h

p t heframeworkoft hi s

.s i s e h

t Addiitonally ,Erving Goffman’ sconcep tof sitgma and David Mayal’l s f o t p e c n o

c Gypsy idenitites are employed to suppor tthe arguments. Ricouer’ s l a c it ir c f o l e d o m a s a o s l a t u b k r o w e m a r f e h t s a y l n o t o n s t c a s c it u e n e m r e h y d u t s s i h t n e p r a h s o t g n i k n i h

t .Meanwhlie ,Goffman and Mayal’l sconcept sare n o i c i p s u s e h t e t a r o b a l e d n a y fi t n e d i o t d e s

u . Ther esistance soft hecharacter sare

e u s s i e h t e m o c r e v o o t n o it u l o s s ' o h l e o C t n e s e r p o t r e d r o n i d e z y l a n a r e h tr u f o s l a . n o it a z it a m g it s f o o h l e o C y b d e y a rt r o p s i o h w , a n e h t A t a h t s w o h s y d u t s s i h

T inTheWticho f

o ll e b o t r o

P ,constan ltyexpe irencess itgmaitzaitonsi nanurbanwo lrd .Athenadoe s e h t n i s r e t c a r a h c r e h t o y n a M . fl e s r e h y b l l a a m g it s e h t r a e b o t e v a h s y a w l a t o n n o it a z it a m g it s e s e h T . s y a w s u o ir a v n i r e h d n e f e d y r o t

s expeirences ,along wtih

y ti t n e d i d e z it a m g it s e t a m it l u r e h o t r e h d a e l , s ti a rt d n a s e it il i b a l a u s u n u r e

h — a

h c ti

w .Fu trhermore ,Athena resist sthe sitgmaitzaiton sshe receive sin va irou s .

s y a

w Theser esistance sareconstanltychanging ,whichshowAthena’ swisdomi n s e r a m g it s r e

h istance .Thi swisdom in resisitng sitgma thus become Coelho' s t e g a s s e

m ot hevicitm sofs itgmaitzaiton.I nt heend ,thist hesi sarguest hatt hrough

o ll e b o t r o P f o h c ti W e h

T Coelho expect shi sreaders to develop sympathy ast he m g it s e h t d n e f e d o t p e t s t s ri

f aitzedi ndividual .s

f o e m e h t e h t n o e r o m e r o l p x e n a c s r e h c r a e s e r e r u t u f , y ll a n i F s a l l e w s a s k r o w s ' o h l e o C r e h t o n a n i n o it a z il a n i g r a

m deconsrtuctsthemi nordert o

s u h t d n a n e p p a h n a c n o it a z il a n i g r a m h c u s w o h n o r e w s n a t e

g provide et h b est

. n o it u l o s o w y e


(13)

x

K

A

R

T

S

B

A

1 0 2 ( o r o g g n A o t e S s u n a ir d

A 6 .) S itgma itza itonandS itgmaResistanceinPaulo s

o h l e o

C TheWticho fPortobello. Yogyakatra :Magiste rKaijan BahasaI ngg irs , .

a m r a h D a t a n a S s a ti s r e v i n U , a n a jr a s a c s a P m a r g o r P

ti l e n e

P ian i n imenggunakan nove lPaulo Coelho yang bejrudu lTheWtich o

ll e b o t r o P f

o untuk mengungkap pesan Coelho dalam menyikap iidenttia syang m

a l a D . n a k a m g it s i

d novelini ,Coelhomengk irits ipembe iransitgmayangbanyak r

a j a w p a g g n a i

d sampa i saa t ini . Coelho menunjukkan buruknya efek dar i t

a k a r a y s a m a d a p e k a m g it s n a ir e b m e

p terutama kaum margina l dengan cara

s u r e n e m s u r e t a i d a n a m i d i s i s o p m a l a d a y n a m a t u r e t k a r a k n a k k a t e l e m

i a g a b e s i k il i m a i d g n a y s a ti t n e d i a n e r a k n a k a m g it s i

d Gypsy .Untuk menangkap

o h l e o C n a s e

p dalampermasalahans itgmasisas,is ayamenggunakanmetodekaijan n

a k ri s f a n e m m a l a d a k a t s u

p nove lini dengan menunjukkan sitgmaitsas iyang r

e t k a r a k i m a l a i

d -karakternyadanbagaimanamerekabereaks.i m

e m i n i s i s e

T baha spermasalahan sitgmasisas idengan solusinya diilha t ir

a

d pelrawanan karakter-karakte rd idalam novel .Dalam menginterpretas i The o

ll e b o tr o P f o h c ti

W ,thesi sin imenggunakan pendekatan flioso if skarya Pau l l

u d u jr e b r e u o c i

R hermeneuitc so f suspicion sebaga ikerangka berpiki rdalam i

n i s i s e h

t . eS baga itambahan ,konsep sitgma karya Erving Goffman dan konsep s

a ti t n e d i g n a t n e t l l a y a M d i v a

D Gypsy digunakan sebaga ipendukung argumen .

i r o e

T hermeneu itcsRicoue rberperan sebaga ikerangkaberpikri nd a jugasebaga i m

a j a tr e p m e m k u t n u s it ir k n a ri k i m e p l e d o

m peneilitan .Konsep Goffman dan

n a k s a l e j n e m n a d i s a k if it n e d i g n e m k u t n u n a k a n u g i d l l a y a

M suspicion tersebut .

n a s e p n a k k u j n u n e m a k g n a r m a l a d a s il a n a i d a g u j r e t k a r a k a r a p i r a d n a n a w a lr e P

i s a s it a m g it s n a h a l a s a m r e p i s a t a g n e m k u t n u o h l e o

C .

k u j n u n e m i n i n a it il e n e

P kan bahwa Athena yang secara teru smeneru s a

m g it s g n u g g n a n e m m a l a d n a ir i d n e s u l a l e s k a d it i s a s it a m g it s i m a l a g n e

m -sitgma

t u b e s r e

t karena karakte rlain membelanya dengan berbaga icara .Pengalaman -t

u b e s r e t i s a s it a m g it s n a m a l a g n e

p , bersama dengan kemampuan sfia t dan

a s a i b k a d it g n a y a n e h t A n a u p m a m e

k ,membawanya pada identtia syang pailng

a m g it s t a p a d n e m k a y n a

b —seorang wtich .Athena melawan sitgmaitsas itersebu t a

r a c i a g a b r e b n a g n e

d . Cara-cara yang selalu berubah in i menunjukkan a

n a s k a ji b e K . a n e h t A n a a n a s k a ji b e

k a n tersebu tmenjad ipesan Coelho untuk para i

s a s it a m g it s n a b r o

k .Akhrinya ,thesisi n iberpendapa tbahwamelalu iTheWtich o f o

ll e b o t r o

P Coelho menginginkan pembacanya untuk bersimpaitsebagail angkah i

s a s it a m g it s n a b r o k p a it e s a l e b m e m k u t n u l a w

a .

t a k r i h k

A a ,parapenelti id imasayang akan datang dapa tmengeksploras i a

m e

t -temamarginailsas idalamkarya-karyaCoelho yangl ainsetramembedahnya t a p a d t u b e s r e t i s a s il a n i g r a m a n a m i a g a b s a t a n a b a w a j h e l o r e p m e m a k g n a r m a l a d

n a d i d a jr e

t membe irkansolus iyangt erbai k. i

c n u k a t a


(14)

1

N

O

I

T

C

U

D

O

R

T

N

I

.

1 Backgroundoft heStudy

y ll u f t o n e r a y e h t e s u a c e b r e f f u s s y a w l a s e it ir o n i m r e h t o y n a m d n a s e i s p y G

t e i c o s t s o h r o j a m e h t y b d e t p e c c

a ies .Manyhisto ircal events r ecordthe brutaltiy t ha t y

e h t e s u a c e b y l n o e v i e c e r o t e v a h y e h

t are different from common people .Thei r ,

s e it it n e d

i ort heatt irbute swhichmakethemdfiferent, areperceivedast hreat samong .

e l p o e p r e h t

o Thus , sitgma i s “an att irbute tha t i s deeply discrediitng”1 whlie f

o n o it c a e h t o t s r e f e r n o it a z it a m g it

s labeilng an att irbute wtih sitgma . sA a resutl , a

m g it s e h t f o e s u a c e b r a e f n i e v il s y a w l a y e h

t driected t o t hose i denitites. Many o f s

e it it n e d i r i e h t e d i h o t d e c r o f e r a e l p o e p e s e h

t ,causing them to suffer .Sadly ,such e

r a s n o it a z it a m g it

s stli lqutiecommon i nt hist wenty-fris tcentury .Thedeclaraitono f e

h t h ti w g n i h t e m o s s e o d y l d r a h s t h g ir n a m u

h sitgmaitzaitons tha thappen around t he .

d lr o w

k r o w s i h n i n o it a z it a m g it s f o e u s s i h c u s s e s i a r o h l e o C o l u a

P The Wtich o f

o ll e b o t r o

P .Athena ,the main protagonis to fthe story ,i sa woman who constanlty a

m g it s e h t f o e s u a c e b s r e f f u

s she receives .Athen 'a sstoryi s t old by her l ove racitng r o t a r r a n d e m a n n u s i h t , y r o t s e h t f o g n i n n i g e b e h t n I . y h p a r g o i b r e h f o r o t a r r a n a s a

n i p o n w o y m e s o p m i o t n o it n e t n i y m t ' n s a w t i e c n i S “ s e t a t

s ion sont her eade .r.. Isoon

h c a o r p p a t s e b e h t t a h t d e d i c e d d n a y h p a r g o i b t h g i a rt s a g n it ir w f o a e d i e h t d e n o d n a b a


(15)

” e m d l o t d a h e l p o e p t a h w e b ir c s n a rt o t y l p m i s e b d l u o

w 2 .The Wtich o fPortobello

h t a e d l a t u r b s ’ a n e h t A h ti w s tr a t

s —mutliated and burned .Soon a tfer ,the plo tset s y

a d e h t o t k c a

b when a Ch irsitan couple from Beriu tadopt she rwhen she i sstli lan h

c i h w , t n a f n

i reveal stha the rbi trh mothe ri sa Gypsy .Athena’ schlidhood i san .

e r u t u f e h t t c i d e r p d n a s g n i h t e e s o t e l b a s i e h s e s u a c e b e n o l a u s u n

u A sshegrow sup ,

s e it it n e d i r e h o t d e t c e ri d s n o it a z it a m g it s s u o ir a v s e c n e ir e p x e a n e h t

A . However ,

.s n o it a z it a m g it s h c u s t s i s e r o t y a w a s d n if s y a w l a a n e h t

A sA anadul tshet irest o ifnd

t u

o he rreali denttiy ,whichl ead shert ohe rbi trhmother .Theencounte rw tihhe rbi trh c

, a n a il i L , r e h t o

m hange she rlfie forever .She become smore aware o fhe rGypsy s

n r a e l e h S . r e w o p r e h d n a y ti t n e d

i abou thowt ousehe rpower f rom awomannamed s

A . r o t n e m s ’ a n e h t A r e h s e k a m h c i h w , a d d

E a resutl ,Athenai sablet o rtansformi nto .

a if o S a i g a H d e ll a c e s l e e n o e m o

s Int hisf orm,s hei sablet operformva irou smriacle .s h ti w m e h t p l e h n a c r e w o p r e h k n i h t y e h t e s u a c e b r e h w o ll o f o t e m o c e l p o e p y n a M

h t t a t l u c c i n a t a S e h t “ s a m e h t d e s u c c a k c u B n a I d n e r e v e R , r e v e w o H . s m e l b o r p r i e h

t e

( ” d n a l g n E f o t r a e

h TWP 224) .He then gather shi spa irshioner sto protes tthem .In e fi l r e h e u n it n o c d n a h t a e d r e h e k a f o t s a h a n e h t A , 't n u h h c ti w ' s i h t e p a c s e o t r e d r o

. y lt e r c e s

o h l e o

C “seldom use scomplex allego ires ,metaphors ,or i dioms .Al lhi swork s i h f o s tr a e h e h t o s l a t u b n o it a n i g a m i e h t y l n o t o n s e r u t p a c e l y t s s i h .. . e l p m i s s i

2 Paulo Coelho ,The Wtich o fPortobello (A Bruxa de Po trobello ) rtans .Margare tJul lCosta (New :

k r o


(16)

s e v l e s r u o g n i d n if n i s e il s s e n i p p a h .. .s i e g a s s e m s i H . s r e d a e

r ”3. In The Wtich o f

, o ll e b o t r o

P Coelhoconsistenltyuses t he samestyle . tI i sastoryo fa woman named w

a n e h t

A h o t ire sto ifnd happines sby ifnding hersefl .However ,before ifnding r

e h e s u a c e b t s ri f g n ir e f f u s h ti w l a e d o t s a h a n e h t A s s e n i p p a

h idenit ites ea r

sitgmaitzedbadlybyt hesocietyeveni nanurbansetitng.Throught hi snovel ,Coelho a

h t e z i s a h p m e o t s t n a

w tmany innocen tvicitm ssuffe rbecause they expe irence r

a li m i

s sitgmaitzaitona sAthena’s. o

h l e o

C ha sar easont ochoose urban setitng .A ssuggestedbyPete rH .Mann , e

h

t idea lform o fsocial l fie should be present i n t he ciite sbecause “tolerance o fo r avoidance o f eccent irc behaviou r i s much more ilkely in the ctiy than the

e d i s y rt n u o

c ”4 .One o fthe reasons behind thi stolerance i sbecause ci ite sand othe r a

h s a e r a n a b r

u v e bette raccess t o socia lservice ssuch a spoilce depa trment .In othe r c

a y n a , s d r o

w t sofi ntolerancet ha thappeni nside t heseurbanarea sarepunishableby y

a w r e tt e b a n i w a

l . A sar esul,tt her esident so furbanarea sareconsideredt obemore .s

a e r a l a r u r n i g n i v il e r a o h w e s o h t o t d e r a p m o c d e z il i v i

c Urbanarea sarealsoknown

i e h t r o

f r seculartiy . “Compeititon among town s sitmulated speciailzaiton and l a c i h p a r g o e g d n a s ll i k s g n it n u o c c a , y c a r e ti l r o f d e e n e h T . n o it a v o n n i l a c i g o l o n h c e t

” n o it a c u d e r a l u c e s n i t s e v n i o t s n w o t e h t e s u a c e g d e l w o n

k 5 .Thi ssecular tiyi sone o f

e h

t reasons why people in urban area sare considered modern .I ti sbeileved that a

3 Glauco Otrolano & Paulo Coelho, “An Interview wtih Paulo Coelho :The Coming o fAge o fa n

o n e m o n e h P n a il i z a r

B ”, World Ltierature Today 77 , 1 (Apr-Jun 2003): 75 , W , eb 6 May 02 31 <http://wwwj.sto.rorg/stable/40157785>.

4Pete rH .Mann,AnApproacht oUrbanSociology(London :Roultedge&KeganPaul ,1970) 1 09.

5Kingsley Davis ,“TheUrbanizaitonoft heHuman Populaiton”, Urbanismi n World Perspecitve :A

r e d a e


(17)

d n u o r a n o i n i p o d n a e d u ti tt a f o y ti s r e v i d e h t f o s s e n e r a w a e r o m s w o h s “ n a m n r e d o m

, d n a e k il a s k n i h t e n o y r e v e t a h t f e il e b e h t n i f f o f l e s m i h g n i s o l c n a h t r e h t a r , m i h

m i h e k il t s u j , d e e d n

i .”6

l a i c o s n a m u h f o m r o f l a e d i e h t s a n e e s s i e fi l n a b r u , d e n o it n e m y l s u o i v e r p s A

. r e h t e g o t e fi l n r e d o m a e fi l d n a s e it i s r e v i d e h t t p e c c a n a c e n o y r e v e e r e h w e fi

l T his

l a e r e h t h c t a m t o n s e o d , r e v e w o h , m s il a e d

i -lfiecondiiton .Desptiet he modernizaiton , a

e r e h

t res tli lmanyurbanr esident swhocannotacceptt hediversiite samongt hem .A s a resul ,tt heybecomet heculprtist hats itgmaitzemanyi nnocen tvicitm .s

s k r o w r e h t o s i h n i n e e s e b n a c a m g it s f o r e g n a d e h t f o s s e n e r a w a s ’ o h l e o

C .I n

s e t u n i M n e v e l

E ,Coelhot ellst hestoryo faprosttiutenamedMaira .Sinceprosttiuiton s a k r o w o h w e s o h t e z it a m g it s o t d n e t e l p o e p , n e m o w r o f s b o j t s r o w e h t f o e n o s i

e t u ti t s o r

p s .Int hi snovel ,Coelhogoesf romdiscussingt hesitgmaoft heprosttiutest o n

e m o w e h t f o a m g it s e h

t in general. A s the narrato r o f thi snovel ,he state s d n a , a m g it s a e t a e r c o t y l n o s e v r e s m r e t e h t d n a , d lr o w e h t l o rt n o c n e m , s y a d a w o n “

” e t u ti t s o r p a d e b b u d y ll a c it a m o t u a s i e n il f o t u o s p e t s o h w n a m o w y n

a 7 . InTheWtich

o ll e b o t r o P f

o ,Coelho develop sthe sitgmaitzaiton issue in a much broade rway . t

a h t w o h s o t s t n a w o h l e o C , a n e h t A h g u o r h

T everyone can be the vicitm o f

. n o it a z it a m g it

s

, y ll a it i n

I Athena seem s ilke anorma lperson who t irest o make a ilvingi n an a

e r a n a b r

u .However ,Athenaalwaysf eelst hatshei sl ackings omething .Event hough

6AlexInkeles, “TheModernizaiton o fMan”, Urbanismi n World Perspecitve :AReader ,E d.Sylvia

a v a F s i e l

F (NewYork :Thoma sY .Crowel lCompany ,1968)363.

7PauloCoelho, ElevenMinutes( OnzeMinutos )tran .sMargaretJ ul lCosta (NewYork :HarperColilns , )

3 0 0


(18)

r e h o t g n i d r o c c a e fi l l u f s s e c c u s a s a h e h

s adopitve mother ,she decide sto ifnd he r g

n o l r e h e c a r b m e d n a r e h t o m h tr i

b -forgottenGypsyidenttiy.

h , y e n o m n r a e o t y ti li b a r e h , s s e c c u s l a n o i s s e f o r p r e h l l a f i s a s a w t

I er j oya t

n o s r e h h ti w d e y a l p e h s n e h w t n e m t n e t n o c r e h , e m o h w e n a d n u o f g n i v a

h —

n o s d n a r g y

m —had al lbeen relegated to second place . Iwa squ tie simply h tr i b r e h f o h c r a e s n i o g o t d e d i c e d d 'e h s t a h t e m d l o t e n ir e h S n e h w d e if ir r e t

.r e h t o

m (TWP 48 - )8 5 o

H wever , embracing he r Gypsy identtiy also mean s expe irencing simlia r , e n o y s p y G e h t y ll a i c e p s e , s e it it n e d i r e h f o h c a E . s r o t s e c n a r e h s a n o it a z it a m g it s

. y t e i c o s e h t o t n o it a l e r n i s m e l b o r p t n e r e f fi d s t n o r f n o c

.

2 Signi ifcanceoft heStudy

h t n i n e e s e b n a c s

A e b ire fsummary ,Athena’ sGypsy i denttiy i sone o fhe r t

a h t s e it it n e d

i i sheavliys itgmaitzed .TheGypsiest hemselve shavebecomeoneoft he a s a m e h t e z it a m g it s s l a i c if f o e h t n e v E . o g a e m it g n o l e c n i s s e it e i c o s d e z il a n i g r a m

g i s e b o t r a e p p a e r e h T “ . e c a n e

m ni ifcan tsimlia ir ite sbetween of ifcia land ltierary o t e ri s e d a d n a e c a n e m d n o b a g a v e h t r e v o n r e c n o c l a e r a g n i w o h s h t o b h ti w , s e c r u o s

d lr o w r e d n u e v i s r e v b u s d n a t n a r e n it i e h t f o e c a f e h t n i r e d r o n i a t n i a

m .”8 Gypsy s

s u j s i e c a n e m d n o b a g a v s a n o it a z it a m g it

s toneoft hes itgmat hatt heyhavet or eceive . s

e ti r w e h s k o o b e h t n i r e t c a r a h c y s p y G s t u p s e m it e m o s o h l e o

C such a s The

t s i m e h c l

A .

n

I The Alchemist, Gypsy appear sa sa mino rcharacte rwtih an ablitiy to .

s m a e r d t e r p r e t n

i The Alchemist tisefl t ell sastory o fa boy namedSanitago who ha s


(19)

n e d d i h a o t m i h s d a e l ti e s u a c e b m a e r d t a h t s w o ll o f n e h t e H . e c i w t m a e r d e m a s e h t

o t p l e h r e h r o f k s a o t y s p y G a o t s e m o c e h , y r o t s e h t f o g n i n n i g e b e h t t A . e r u s a e rt

s w o h s y s p y G e h t h ti w r e t n u o c n e s i H . m a e r d t a h t t e r p r e t n

i how people alway s

. e p y t o e r e t s g n i v i g y b m e h t e z it a m g it s

t a h t d i a s o s l a s a w t I .s r e h t o g n i k c ir t s e v il r i e h t t n e p s s e i s p y G t a h t d i a s e l p o e P

g n i k a t , d n a n e r d li h c d e p p a n d i k y e h t t a h t d n a , li v e d e h t h ti w t c a p a d a h y e h t

d a m , s p m a c s u o ir e t s y m e h t o t y a w a m e h

t e t hem t hei rslaves .A sa chlid, t he y b d e r u t p a c e b d l u o w e h t a h t h t a e d o t d e n e t h g ir f n e e b s y a w l a d a h y o b

s i h k o o t n a m o w d l o e h t n e h w d e n r u t e r r a e f d o o h d li h c s i h t d n a , s e i s p y G

.s r e h n i s d n a

h 9

a s a t c a s e i s p y G e h t t a h t n e e s e b n a c t i , n o it a t o u q e h t m o r

F bogeyman to scare

a s a s n o it c n u f h c ti w A “ . n o it c n u f e m a s e h t e v a h s e h c ti w , y lr a li m i S . n e r d li h c

, r e h t o n a n i e li h w ; y ti m a l a c d e n i a l p x e n u y n a r o f n o s a e r a s e d i v o r p o h w n a m y e g o b

e ll i k d n a d e s u c c a e r a e l p o e p l a e r , m s a t n a h p a y l n o y lr a li m i s s i h c ti w e h t h g u o h tl

a df o r

. o d t o n d l u o c y e h t s d e e

d ” 01 I tdoe sno tmean tha tCoelho himsel fsitgmaitze sthe y r a n i d r o a rt x e s a y s p y G s d n a t s r e d n u o h l e o C t a h t s w o h s y l n o t i , d a e t s n I . s e i s p y G

y ll a e r o g a it n a S , y r o t s e h t f o d n e e h t n I . y r e c r o s r o e l c a ri m m r o f r e p n a c o h w e l p o e p

t s d n

if he rteasure ,whichmeanst hatt heGypsy' sprophecyi sactually irgh.t e

li h w n a e

M ,history record san Indonesian wtich hun tin 1998. Du irng tha t r

a e

y ,SouthMalangt urns i ntoabloodyl andbecause t hosewho areaccusedo fblack b

m u n e h T . d e r c a s s a m e r a c i g a

m e ro fvicitm sreache s ti speak on Ramadan fasitng e

h t e li h w h t n o

m massacre sarleady begin in 1998 and conitnue sunit lyea r2000 .

9 Paulo Coelho ,TheAlchemis t(O Alquimista )rtans .Alan R .Clarke(San Fransisco :HarperColilns ,

1 ) 3 9 9

1 2.

0

1 hT si book review i sconducted on Lucy Mai'r sWtichcraf twirtten in 1969 and pubilshed by

w a r G c

M -Hill .RaymondPirnce, “BookReviews” ,AmericanAnthropologis tNewSeries , 27 4. (Augus t )

0 7 9


(20)

. e l p o e p p l e h o t r e w o p r i e h t g n i s u y ll a u t c a e r a s m it c i v e h t f o y n a

M “People visti s

e h t e v a h , d e l a e h e b o t e e f a s y a p d n a s n a m a h

s ri f uture r ead ,begiven l uckymanrtas , s

a n w o n k s r e r e c r o s ,r e v e w o H . n o o s d n

a dukuns antet ro tukangs ante tarebeilevedt o e

c it c a r

p limugaib”11 .The r elaiton betweenethnic and r eilgion i n t hi sattack i squtie .

d e t a c il p m o c

a tt a e h t e r e h w s e g a ll i v e h t n

I ck soccurred the majortiy o fpeople are ethnic o n d e y a l p s i d s k c a tt a , r e v e w o H . e g a u g n a l y li a d e h t s i e s e r u d a M d n a , e s e r u d a M

s m it c i v r i e h t d n a s r e k c a tt a s a , y ti r o n i m e s e n a v a J e h t h ti w t c il f n o c f o n r e tt a p

e s e r u d a M d n a e s e n a v a J h t o b d e d u l c n

i .Ther eilgioni nt hef ou rdist irct swhere (

m a l s I e s e n a v a J. .. y lt n a n i m o d e r p s i d e r r u c c o s k c a tt a r u o

f Islam-Jawa .)12

d e r e d i s n o c s i m a l s I e s e n a v a J , m a l s I e r a s m it c i v d n a s r e k c a tt a e h t h t o b h g u o h t n e v E

a h t e r o m s e v l o v n i k c a tt a e h t t a h t t c a f e h t e ti p s e D . s r e k c a tt a e h t y b g n o r

w n hundred

n e h w , s k c a tt a r e h t o n a n I . d e t s e r r a g n i e b e r a m e h t f o e m o s y l n o , n e

m “three loca l

s t n e d i s e r l a c o l y r g n a , e s n o p s e r n i , d n a , s g n il li k e h t r o f d e t s e r r a e r e w s t n e d i s e r

( s n o it a t s e c il o p l a c o l e h t d e y o rt s e

d mapolsek )anddemandedt herir elease”13 .tIs how s l

a c o l e h t w o

h authortiy i shelples sagainst t he mobs .Some Islamic l eader salso t ake .

'l li k o t e s n e c il a' m e h t g n i v i g y b s k c a tt a e s e h t n i tr a

p “In1993Ma lruk ihadallegedly

y li m a f s' d e s a e c e d e h t h c i h w r e tf a , t n e d i s e r l a c o l a r e d r u m o t c i g a m k c a l b d e s

u wentt o

a m o r f n o i s s i m r e p l a n o it i d n o c e v i e c e r y e h t e r e h w , a r u d a

M kia i(Islamic t eacher) t o

e c n a e g n e v k e e

s ”14 .

e s e h

T dukun sante talso allegedly associated wtih PK I(Communis tPatry o f m

e h t e k a m h c i h w , ) a i s e n o d n

I “consrtucted both a s(un)natura labominaiton sa swel l

1

1 Chalres .A Coppel, Violen tConfilctsi nI ndonesia(NewYork :Roultedge ,2006 )90. 2

1 Coppel, 19 . 3

1 Coppel, 29 . 4


(21)

e r e w m e h t t s n i a g a s e r u s a e m e v it i n u p l a t u r b e c n e h d n a , y ti n u m m o c e h t o t a m e h t a n a s a

d e if it s u

j ”15 .Theseattacker salsoattackapoilcestaitonbecauset heybeilevet hatt hey h

s i n u p o t t h g ir e h t e v a h o h w s e n o e h t e r

a “alleged thieve sand petty c irminals” t .I t

a h t s w o h

s “the kliilng so fallegeddukun sante tmus tbesimlia lryunderstooda sact s e

c it s u j y ti n u m m o c f

o ”16 .Sadly ,many of t he i ndividuals i nvolved i n t he attack sare e

h t t s n i a g a e g d u r g o n g n i v a

h dukun santet .“Acommonexplanaitonoft heattack son d

e g e ll

a dukun sante ti s tha tpeople j'us tjoined in '(cuma ikut-ikutan) , wtihou t n

o it a g it s n

i ”17 . The ones who actually responsible a re the provocateur s o r y

c a ri p s n o c a f o t r a p a e r e w o h w s d n i m r e t s a

m ”18.

s i h l l a t a h t d i a s o h l e o

C work sare “committedt oanewpoil itca latttiude :man y

ti t n e d i n w o s i h f o h c r a e s n

i ”19.I n t hecase o fThe Wticho fPortobello ,Athenai s i n . r e h t o m h tr i b r e h d n if o t y e n r u o j r e h y b y ti t n e d i e u rt r e h r o n i g ir o r e h f o h c r a e s

e s u a c e b t s i x e y ll a e r t o n s e o d y ti t n e d i e u rt , r e v e w o

H on 'e so irgin i sa consrtucted

e h s y a d e h t e c n i s d e t c u rt s n o c s i y ti t n e d i s' a n e h t A . y ti t n e d

i wa sborn .Ass hegrow sup ,

n I . a m g it s e v it c e p s e r n w o r i e h t r a e b y ti t n e d i r e h f o h c a e t a h t e t a c i d n i s n o it c a r e h l l a

c e b r e h s e k a m y ti t n e d i y s p y G r e h g n i d n if , d n e e h

t omea vicitmo fsitgmaitzaitonj us t

. t s a p e h t n i s e i s p y G y n a m d n a r e h t o m h tr i b r e h e k

il Coelho' sawarenes soft hedange r n

i n w o h s y l n o t o n s i a m g it s f

o TheWticho fPortobello.I nVeronikaDecidest oDie20 ,

5

1 Coppel, 79 . 6

1 Coppel, 79 - 89 . 7

1 Coppel, 99 . 8

1 Coppel, 11 .0 9

1 Otrolano& Coelho ,5 .8 0

2 PauloCoelho, VeronikaDecidest o Die(Veronika DecideMorrer )rtans .Margare tJul lCosta (New

: k r o


(22)

m e h t o t n o it a z it a m g it s f o e u s s i e h t s e s i a r o h l e o

C entally handicapped people by

. m u l y s a n a e d i s n i e fi l e h t g n it n e s e r p

t u o b a n o it s e u q e h t r e w s n a o t y r a s s e c e n t i s e k a m e d u ti tt a l a c it il o p s ’ o h l e o C

s n a m u h t a h t f e il e b s ’ o h l e o C h ti w e e r g a o t s m e e s m u t a T l e i n a D y lr e v e B . fl e s ti y ti t n e d i

e h t d n if o t d e n it s e d e r

a i r rtue sefl .In he rw iritng “The Complextiyo fIdenttiy :Who a m o r f s e m o c y ti t n e d i r e h r o s i h g n i d n if n i t s e u q s ’ e n o t a h t s n i a l p x e m u t a T ” ? I m a

n o it s e u q e l p m i s e h t s e t a r o b a l e r e h tr u f m u t a T ? I m a o h w : n o it s e u q e l p m i

s broade r

s n o it s e u

q . Theanswer soft hesequesiton scan bef oundi n t hei nteraciton swtihothe r .

s e it it n e d i t n e r e f fi d e v a h o h w e l p o e

p She meniton stha t“integraitng one’ spast , n i s n i g e b t a h t k s a t x e l p m o c s i fl e s f o e s n e s d e if i n u , e v i s e h o c a o t n i e r u t u f d n a , t n e s e r p

r o f s e u n it n o c d n a e c n e c s e l o d

a a lfieitme”21 .In the end ,she emphasize son how . s t n e m g d u j n o m m o c s ’ y t e i c o s e h t f o e s u a c e b k s a t h c u s e v a h o t s i t i t l u c if fi d

n i e li h w n a e

M The Wtich o fPortobello ,Athena also encounter ssimlia rdfi ifcutly .

y ti t n e d i y s p y G r e h t u o d n if o t s e ir t e h s n e h w

i h

T sstudy i sconducted wtih hope tha treader scan have more angle sand n

o e v it c e p s r e p r e d a o r

b The Wtich o f Portobello . I t i s hoped tha t the theo ire s .

l a o g h c u s g n i v e i h c a n i p l e h n a c y d u t s s i h t n i d e y o l p m

e Ihope Athen 'a sporrtaya l

n o s a n e e s y l n o t o n s i e r e

h es'j ourneyt o ifndheri denttiybu tmoreonhowt hesociety I , s r e d a e r n a i s e n o d n I h ti w y lr a l u c it r a P . n o it a z it a m g it s f o t c e j b u s a s a y ti t n e d i r e h s e e s

, s u h T . s i n o it a z it a m g it s s u o r e g n a d w o h f o s s e n e r a w a r i e h t e s i a r n a c y d u t s s i h t e p o h

1

2 Bevelry Danie lTatum,The C mo plextiy o fIdenttiy :Who am I?”, Reading sfo rDiverstiy and

Socia lJusitce :AnAnthologyonRacism ,Sexism ,A itn -semiitsm ,Heterosexism ,ClassismandA ebl ism , .

d

E Mau iranneAdams ,Warren J .Blumenfeld ,Carmeltia (Rosie )Castañeda ,Heathe rW .Hackman , ,

s r e t e P . L e n il e d a


(23)

y d u t s s i h

t can en irch them wtih plurailsm values .Anothe rhopei s t o grasp Coelho' s c

it ir c d n a s e g a s s e

m ism sdeilvered to society through hi sreaders .Coelho once fea r n

e tt o g r o f e b y a m s k o o b s i h t a h

t 22,t hat i swhy Ialso hope t hat t hi sstudycan alway s e

o C f o s r e d a e r e h t d n i m e

r lho andhi smessagesf o rus .Finally , Ihopeby conducitng m o r f s r a l o h c s n a i s e n o d n I y b d e r o l p x e y d u t s e r u t a r e ti l e h t h c ir n e n a c I y d u t s s i h t

. e c n e i c s n o c d n a , n o i s s a p m o c , e c n e t e p m o c d li u b o t y ti s r e v i n U a m r a h D a t a n a S

n it c u d n o c e r a s r e h c r a e s e r , y lr a l u c it r a

P g thei rstudies on magica l reailsm .

s l e v o n s ' o h l e o C n o s t n e m e l

e One oft hemi sStephenM .Har.tI nhi sstudy“Cutlura l s' o h l e o C o l u a P n i c i g a M f o e g a u g n a L e h t d n a , m s il a e R l a c i g a M , y ti d ir b y

H The

t s i m e h c l

A ” ,he explore sthe magica lreailsm elemen to fThe Alchemist .Har talso n

e e w t e b e c n e r e f fi d e h t s e if it n e d

i the rtadiitona lapproach t o magica lreailsm and t he t

a h t s e v e il e b t r a H , d n e e h t n I . h c a o r p p a s e i d u t s l a r u tl u c w e

n Coelho' s ifcitondoe sno t

e s u y l e r e

m thet echnique so fmagicalr eailsm ,bu talsoendowst hemwtih“avisionary s u f o h c a e t a h t , e r u s a e rt r o f d e n it s e d s i s u f o h c a e t a h t n o it o n e h t g n it o m o r p , y ti l a u q

e h t h c r a e s o t s u o t p u s i ti t a h t d n a , s u n i h ti w n w o d p e e d d e ir u b m a e r d l a c i g a m a s a h

c i g a m e h t e r e h w r e v o c s i d y ll a n if e w l it n u s u d n u o r a y ti l a e

r i .”s 23

it l u m a s

A -dimensiona lnovel ,The Wtich o fPortobello can give insight sto .

e c n a r e l o t e s i a r o t r e d r o n i s r e d a e r n a i s e n o d n I y ll a i c e p s e , s r e d a e r e h

t Desptie t hef ac t

m , a i s e n o d n I n i t s i x e t o n o d s e i s p y G t a h

t anyethnic mino iritesi nI ndonesiaare being .

s e i s p y G e h t e k il t s u j d e z it a m g it

s Thes toryo fhowAthenai smarginailzedbecauseo f

2

2 Morais, 43 .1 3

2 Stephen M .Hatr . “Cutlura lHyb irdtiy ,Magica lReailsm ,and the Language o fMagic in Paulo

t s i m e h c l A e h T s ' o h l e o

C ”, Romance Quarterly, 51 (Fal l 2004 ) 304-3 12. Web . 6 May 2013 <wwwt.and .fco.ukj/ournals/itltes/08831157.asp>.


(24)

a s i a i s e n o d n I e c n i s s n a i s e n o d n I g n o m a y ti l a u q e e t o m o r p l l a h s n e v i g a m g it s e h t

ti ri p s e h t r e d n u d e ti n u e b n a c y e h t ,s u h T . s e it it n e d i s u o ir a v h ti w e l p o e p f o l l u f y rt n u o c

y s p y G r e h o t r e h s d a e l a n e h t A y b d e c n e ir e p x e n o it a z it a m g it s e h T . m s il a n o it a n f o

e r y d u t s s i h T . y ti t n e d

i -read sTheWticho fPortobellounde rhermeneuitc sofs uspicion y

b d e tr o p p u s d n

a Goffman' sconcept of sitgma and Mayal ’l sconcep tof Gypsy it

n e d

i t .y T hisstudy ,howeve ,ri sno tenought odiscovert hewholeaspec toft henove.l s

' o h l e o

C TheWticho fPortobellostli lhide sanothe rmysteryt ha tcanber evealed .A s d

i a s r e u o c i

R , “Thepurposeo fabooki sneve rentrielyj usit ifed.I nanyevent ,noone ri

u q e r s

i edt odisplayhi smoitve sort oentanglehimsefli naconfession .Toattempti t fl

e s e b d l u o

w -delusion”24 .Thephliosophica lapproachusedon t hi sstudyonlyserve s .

k r o w e m a r f e h t s

a Phliosophy i sa discipilne t ha tcu tacros smany othe rdiscipilnes . r

e v e w o

H , t hi sstudywli lno tdiscus sfu trhe ron t he discipilnes other t han t hose used ,

r e v e w o H . y d u t s s i h t n

i The Wtich o fPortobello stli lprovide sa lo to fspace to be d

e r o l p x

e .Tha ti swhy Ihope thi sstudy can challenge more expe tr sfrom va irou s s

d l e

if toconductt hei rowns tudie .s

.

3 ResearchQues itons

n i t a h t e v e il e b I , y d u t s s i h t g n i n n a l

P The Wtich o fPortobello Coelho rties t o t

u o b a s r e d a e r s i h n r a

w thedange rofs itgmaitzaiton .Thu ,st hef ollowingquesiton sare :

d e s i a r

4


(1)

. B , m u t a

T .D T Che omplextiy o fIdent tiy :“Who am I?” Readings f o rDiverstiy and Socia lJusitce :AnAnthologyonRacism ,S iexs A itm , n -semiitsm ,Heterosexism , Classism and Ableism. Ed . Mau iranne Adams , Warren J . Blumenfeld ,

) e i s o R ( a ti l e m r a

C Castañeda ,Heathe rW .Hackman ,Madeilne L .Peters , a

g i ñ ú Z a n e m i

X .NewYork :Roultedge (2000) 9 : - .1 4 .

A , n o t e l s i h


(2)

X

I

D

N

E

P

P

A


(3)

O H L E O C O L U A P F O Y H P A R G O I B a s a b o j s i H . li z a r B , o ri e n a J e d o i R n i , 6 4 9 1 , 0 2 t s u g u A n r o b s a w o h l e o C o l u a P s i h y b d e i n a p m o c c a s i o h l e o C , s n o i s a c c o y n a m n I .t o l a l e v a rt o t m i h s e ri u q e r r e ti r w e ti

l raryagen tnamedM฀nica Antunes .A sa ilnkbetweenCoelho andt he pubilshing r e f e r s r e h s il b u p y n a m , s i h t f o e s u a c e B . s s e n s s e l h t u r r e h r o f n w o n k s i a c i n o M , d lr o w .' a n o l e c r a B f o h c ti w e h t' s a r e h o t

Coelho i sthe fris tchlid o fthe Braziilan couple Lygia Ara irpe Coelho de s e e s m o m s i h d n a e e r h t s i o h l e o C n e h W . a z u o S e d o h l e o C a m i e u Q o r d e P d n a a z u o S s 't I ? a m a M , y a d o t y t h g u a n g n i e b m 'I y h w w o n k u o y o d “ : s e il p e r e h y l d a b e v a h e b m i h a b s i h d n a d r a h y r e v g n i k r o w n e e b s 'e H . g n i k r o w t ' n s i l e g n a n a i d r a u g y m e s u a c e

b ttery

” t u o n u r s a

h .158 A san elementarystudent ,Coelho ha sa t hinand weakbody .Coelho . g n it ir w n i t n e l a t s i h s w o h s h c i h w , l o o h c s s i h n i n o it it e p m o c g n it ir w a s n i w e c n o o t e u D . s t c e j b u s l o o h c s s i h f o y n a m n i s li a f o h l e o C , g n it ir w n i t n e l a t s i h f o e ti p s e D

hi sdeviances ,Coelho' sparents t hen force him t o t ake a p irvate l essons—”physica l n o o n r e tf a e h t n i g n i y d u t s d n a g n i n r o m e h t n i e s i c r e x

e ”.159 Coelho himsel f

. e c n e ir e p x e h c u s s e t a h e h h c u m w o h s e g d e l w o n k c a a w “ e h n e h w m i h l o rt n o c o t e u n it n o c s t n e r a p s ' o h l e o

C sf orcedt o enroll i nt he

d e p o h d a h e h s a s tr a e h t n a h t r e h t a r m a e rt s e c n e i c

s ”.160 A scan be seen,t hey do no t

” l a m r o n “ a n i o h l e o C t u p y ll u f e c r o f y e h T . r e ti r w a s a e v il o t n o s r i e h t e e s o t h s i w 8 5

1 Fernando Morais, Paulo Coelho :A Warrio 'r sLfie :The Authorized Biography (New York :

. 8 4 ) 9 0 0 2 , s n il l o C r e p r a H 9 5

1 Morais ,54. 0

6


(4)

u l y s a l a t n e m a o t t n e s s i o h l e o C , l o o h c s n i y l d a b g n i o D . r e e r a

c mj us tbefore hesta tr s

a s i m e h t f o e n o , s t n e m t a e rt f o t o l a s e o g r e d n u o h l e o C e r e H . t s il a n r u o j a s a r e e r a c s i h . 't n e m t a e rt k c o h s' e c n a b r u t s i d l a t n e m t a h t a e d i e h t n o d e s a b s a w y p a r e h t e v i s l u v n o c o rt c e l E i a r b e h t n i s e c n a b r u t s i d l a c ir t c e l e' m o r f d e tl u s e

r n' .A tfert ent ot wentysession s e h t y b d e s u a c s n o i s l u v n o c e h t , y a d r e h t o y r e v e d e il p p a s k c o h s c ir t c e l e f o e h t ' e z i n a g r o e r' , d e v e il e b s a w t i , d l u o w s e g r a h c c ir t c e l e f o n o i s s e c c u s l a m r o n o t n r u t e r o t m i h g n i w o ll a , n i a r b s 't n e it a

p .161

f o l e g n A e h t , y a d e n

O Death ,ort heappa iritono fdeath tisefl ,appear sbeforeCoelho. o h l e o C . m i h y f s it a s o t t a o g a s ll i k o h l e o C o s e c if ir c a s a s d n a m e d h t a e D f o l e g n A s i h T t n e p s I “ . m u l y s a e h t n i t n e p s e h e m it e h t l l a m o r f s r e f f u s e h w o h s ti m d a f l e s m i h y t n e w

t -eigh tdayst here ,missedclasse ,sl os tmyj obandwasr eleasedasi f Ihadbeen t s ri f e h t n i d e tt i m d a n e e b g n i v a h r e v e y m r o f n o s a e r o n s a w e r e h t h g u o h t n e v e , d e r u c ! e m it s i h t ti e n o d y ll a e r e v a h s t n e r a p y M . e c a l

p ”162 In t he end ,Coelho beileves t ha t e r e h t e m it s i h g n i d n e p

s give shimabette rwayt os eel fie—abette rwisdom.

a s e k a m e h , e m it e n O . e c n e ir e p x e l a r u t a n r e p u s s i h r o f n w o n k o s l a s i o h l e o C t h g u o h t g n o l a r e tf A . l u o s s i h f o e g n a h c x e n i s u o m a f m i h e k a m o t li v e D e h t h ti w t c a p l a s n i o j o s l a o h l e o C . t c a p e h t s l e c n a c e

h o to fsects .Oneof t hem i sThe Chlidren o f w o n d n a l i z a r B n i s r e w o ll o f f o s d e r d n u h t c a rt t a o t d e g a n a m d a h “ t c e s e h T . t c e s d o G , n e r d li h c h ti w x e s d e g a r u o c n e y e h t t a h t s a w h c i h w g n o m a , s n o it a g e ll a s u o ir e s d e c a f n e r d li h c n w o r i e h t d n a s t n e r a p n e e w t e b n e v

e ”.163

1 6

1 Morais ,147. 2

6

1 Morais ,115. 3

6


(5)

ll e w o D c a M a il i c e C o t d e ir r a m o h l e o

C —o rCissa ,on2July1976 .“Theyhad t e s r e t a l d l u o w o l u a P e r e h w , o ll e b o tr o P r a e n , ll i H g n it t o N n i , d a o R t t e s s a B n i d e lt t e s

l e v o n s i

h The Wtich o fPortobello”.164 Coelho work sa sa lyirc wrtie rwhlie Cissa

u o j a s a s k r o

w rnailst .Coelho himsel fclaimst ha t“London wast he step Idreamed o f d

li h c a s a w I n e h w g n i k a

t ”.165 Int ermo fw iritng ,however ,hebecome ssosterlieand

e h t n e h w e g a ir r a m s i h y b d e w o ll o f n e h t s i g n it ir w n i e r u li a f s ' o h l e o C . e v it c u d o r p n u

o t s e d i c e d e l p u o

c have a divorce on 24 March 1979 .Shorlty a tfer ,Coelho meet s d a h e h s h c i h w n o , t o r a t n i t s il a i c e p s a y d a e rl a e h s ,t e m y e h t n e h W “ . a c i c it i O a n it s ir h C

s n o it c i d e r p s ti t e r p r e t n i o t w o h w e n k e h s. .. d n a , s k o o b s u o r e m u n d a e

r ”.166

s ir h C o t e g a ir r a m d n o c e s s ' o h l e o

C itna since22June1980prevalist li lpresen t .

e m

it Two years l ate rwhen Coelho t urns t hi try six ,he ha sa spritiua lawakening i n ,

k o o b t s ri f s i h n i t i t u o b a e t o r w d n a n i a p

S The Pligrimage .However ,i twa shi s k

o o b d n o c e

s —The Alchemist which made him famous .Aside from the previously e

t o r w o s l a e h , s k r o w d e n o it n e

m Brida ,The Valkyries ,By the Rive rPiedra ISa t t

p e W d n a n w o

D ,Maktub ,The Fitfh Mountain ,Warrio ro fthe Light :A Manual , e

i D o t s e d i c e D a k i n o r e

V ,TheDevi landMis sPrym, ElevenMinutes ,TheZahir ,Like r

e v i R g n i w o l F e h

t ,TheWinne rStand sAlone ,Aleph ,Manuscrip tFoundi nAccraand y

r e tl u d

A .

4 6

1 Morais ,364. 5

6

1 Morais ,367. 6

6


(6)

O H L E O C O L U A P H T I W W E I V R E T N I N A e lt it e h t h ti w d e h s il b u p s i w e i v r e t n i s i h

T AnI nterviewwtihPauloCoelho:t he n o n e m o n e h P n a il i z a r B a f o e g A f o g n i m o

C .The i nterview i sconducted by Glauco 3 0 0 2 n i o n a l o tr

O .O trolano ,who work sfo rWo lrd Ltierature Today (WLT) ,i s g n it t u p n i e l b i s n o p s e

r TheAlchemistint het op-ten ils to fBraziilannovelsf ort hepas t s o t o h l e o C g n i k s a s i n o it s e u q t s ri f s i H . s r a e y y t n e w

t hare hi ssecre to fltierary

, t s i x e t o n s e o d a l u m r o f h c u s t a h t g n i y a s y b s e il p e r o h l e o C . a l u m r o f e h t r o y m e h c l a d n o c e s s ' o n a l o tr O . r e tt e b f l e s m i h w o n k o t t e g o t s g n it ir w s i h s e s u y l n o e h t a h t d n a o C . s k r o w s i h e c n e u lf n i s k r o w e s o h w o h l e o C g n i k s a s i n o it s e u

q elhomeniton ssevera l

. e k a l B m a il li W d n a r e ll i M y r n e H , o d a m A e g r o J ,s e g r o B s i u L e g r o J : s e m a n s u o m a f o h l e o C , r e ti r w n a il i z a r B s a f l e s m i h s e e s o h l e o C f i g n i k s a s i o n a l o tr O e li h W a w o h o s l a t u b l i z a r B t u o b a g n it ir w s y a w l a t o n s i ti t a h t g n it a t s y b s d n o p s e

r Braziilan

f o e c n a t s l a c i g o l o e d i r o l a c it il o p e h t k s a o t d e ir t o s l a o n a l o tr O . d lr o w e h t s e e s s k r o w s ' o h l e o

C .Coelho answer sbystaitng t ha this l tierature i scommitted t o a new y ti t n e d i n w o s i h f o h c r a e s n i n a m : e d u ti tt a l a c it il o

p .O trolano also emphasizes the

o h l e o C . n o it i d n o c n a m u h o t g n i d r a g e r n r e c n o c e r o m e v i g o t e r u t a r e ti l r o f d e e n h c a e t c e p s e r e w f i d e v e i h c a e b n a c s n a m u h n e e w t e b s p i h s n o it a l e r d o o g t a h t s e v e il e b , t s o m e h t e v o l o h l e o C k r o w h c i h w t u o b a n o it s e u q h ti w s d n e w e i v r e t n i e h T . r e h t o h l e o C e r e h

w oanswert ha thel ovet hemequally.167

7 6