NOVRIKA DWI NINGRUM 22010111120053 Lap.KTI Bab 8
DAFTAR PUSTAKA
1. Oza S, Lawn JE, Hogan DR, Mathers C, Cousens SN. Neonatal cause-ofdeath estimates for the early and late neonatal periods for 194 countries:
2000–2013. Bulletin of the World Health Organization [Internet]. 2015
(Cited
2015
Feb
23);
93(1):
19-28.
Available
from:
http://www.who.int/bulletin/volumes/93/1/14-139790/en/
2. Badan Penelitian dan Pengembangan Kesehatan Departemen Kesehatan
Republik Indonesia. Riset Kesehatan Dasar 2007. Desember 2008. Bab
3.10. h.278-9
3. Sitohang S, Budijanto D, Hardhana B, Soenardi TA, editor. Kementerian
Kesehatan Republik Indonesia. Buku Profil Kesehatan Indonesia Tahun
2013. Jakarta: 2014. Bab 5. h.87
4. Janjindamai W, Petpisal S. Time to positivity on blood culture in newborn
infants. Southeast As J Trop Med Public Health [Internet]. 2006 (Cited 2015
July 5); 37: 171-5.
5. Unicef. Levels and Trends in Child Mortality 2014: Report 2014 Estimates
developed by the UN inter-agency group for children mortality estimation.
2014. h.15
6. Berry A, Rosenkrantz T, et al. Neonatal sepsis [Internet]. 2014 [Updated:
Feb
11;
Cited
2014
Nov
12).
Available
http://emedicine.medscape.com/article/978352-overview
53
from:
54
7. Sepsis in Neonates. Neonatal Ehandbook. [Internet] Departement of Health,
Victoria, Australia. Updated: July 16, 2014 (Cited 2014 Nov 4). Available
from:
http://www.health.vic.gov.au/neonatalhandbook/infections/sepsis.htm
8. Gupta ML. Module for training of specialist in pediatrics on newborn care:
Module-A (Management of Common Neonatal Problems).
9. Kosim MS, Yunanto A, Dewi R, Sarosa GI, Usman A. Editor (2008). Ikatan
Dokter Anak Indonesia. Buku Ajar Neonatologi. Ed. 1. Badan Penerbit
IDAI. Jakarta. 2008. h.170-185
10. Tutut S. Sepsis pada neonatus (Sepsis neonatal). Sari Pediatri [Internet].
Agustus 2000 (Cited 2014 Nov 12); Vol.2, No.2: 96-102. Available from:
http://saripediatri.idai.or.id/abstrak.asp?q=145
11. Juniatiningsih A, Aminullah A, Firmansyah A. Profil mikroorganisme
penyebab sepsis neonatorum di Departement Ilmu Kesehatan Anak RSCM.
Sari Pediatri, Vol.10, No.1. Juni 2008: 61.
12. Rini AE, Meconium stained amniotic fluid as a risk factor of early onset
neonatal sepsis [dissertation]. Semarang: Universitas Diponegoro; 2010.
13. Anderson-Berry AL. Neonatal sepsis. [Internet]. 2014 (updated 2014 feb
11;
Cited
2014
Nov
10).
Available
from:
http://emedicine.medscape.com/article/978352-overview
14. Edwards MS. Clinical feature and diagnosis of sepsis in term and late
preterm infants [Internet]. Updated: January 31, 2014. (Cited 2014 Nov 25).
55
Available from: http://www.uptodate.com/contents/clinical-features-anddiagnosis-of-sepsis-in-term-and-late-preterm-infants
15. Rodrigo I. Changing patterns of neonatal sepsis. Sri Lanka J Child Health
[Internet]. 2002 (Cited 2015 Feb 23); 31: 3-8. Available from:
http://www.sljol.info/sljol/index.php/SLJCH/article/view/795
16. Russell ARB. Neonatal sepsis. Symposium: Neonatology [Internet]. 2010 (Cited
2014 Nov 17); 265-9. Available from: ScienceDirect.
17. Aminullah A, Gatot D, Kosim MS, Rohsiswatmo R, Indarso F, Dharma R.
(2007).
Penatalaksanaan
sepsis
neonatorum.
Jakarta:
Departemen
Kesehatan Republik Indonesia, 3-80.
18. Tsai CH, Chen YY, Wang KG, Chen CY, Chen CP. Characterictic of earlyonset neonatal sepsis caused by Escherichia coli. [Internet]. 2012 (Cited
2014 Nov 25); 51(1):26-30. Available from: ScienceDirect.
19. Haque KN. Neonatal sepsis in the very low birth weight preterm infants Part
1: Review of Patho-physiology. Journal of Medical Science [Internet]. 2010
(Cited
2015
Jan
26);
3(1):
1-10.
Available
from:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2891980/
20. Richard A and the Committee on fetus and Newborn. Management of
neonates with suspected or proven early-onset bacterial sepsis. Journal of
The American Academy of Pediatrics [Internet]. 2012 (Cited 2014 Dec 10);
129:
1006-1015.
Available
http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/129/5/1006.full
from:
56
21. Haque KN. Definitions of bloodstream infection in the newborn. Pediatric
Critical care medicine [Internet]. 2005 (Cited 2014 Niv 25 ); 6(3): S45-S49.
Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15857558
22. Wynn, J. L., & Wong, H. R. Pathophysiology and treatment of septic shock
in neonates. Clinics in perinatology [Internet]. 2010 (Cited 2015 jan
26);
37(2):
439-479.
Available
from:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2891980/
23. Aminullah A. Masalah terkini sepsis neonatorum. Dalam: Hegar B, Trihono
PP, Irfan EB penyunting. Update in neonatal infection. Naskah lengkap
pendidikan kedokteran berkelanjutan IKA XLVIII; 13-14 Desember 2005,
Jakarta, Indonesia. Jakarta: Balai Penerbit FK UI; 2005. H. 1-13.
24. Sales-santos M, Bunye MO. The complete blood count and hematologic
finding as criteria for neonatal sepsis. Makati medical center proceeding
[Internet]. 1995 (Cited 2015 Jan 25); 40-50.
25. Kumar Y, Qunibi M, Neal TJ, Yoxall CW. Time to positivity of neonatal
blood cultures. Archives of Disease in Childhood-Fetal and Neonatal
Edition [Internet]. 2001 (Cited 2015 Jan 25); 85(3): F182-F186. Available
from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1721335/
26. Shane AL, Stoll BJ. Neonatal sepsis: Progress towards improved
outcomes. Journal of Infection [Internet]. 2014 (Cited 2014 Nov 25 ); 68:
S24-S32. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24140138
57
27. Melville JM, Moss TJ. The immune consequences of preterm
birth. Frontiers in neuroscience [Internet]. 2013 (Cited 2015 Jan 29); 7.
Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23734091
28. Butler, Stith A, Behrman RE. Preterm Birth: Causes, Consequences, and
Prevention. National Academies Press, 2007.
29. Gerdes JS. Diagnosis and management of bacterial infections in the
neonate. Pediatric Clinics of North America [Internet]. 2004 (Cited 2015
Jan
29);
51(4),
939-959.
Available
from:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15275982
30. Arisandi ND. Faktor risiko dan kesamaan jenis kuman jalan lahir ibu dengan
kultur darah pada sepsis neonatal awitan dini [Dissertation]. Master
Program In Biomedical Science; 2008.
31. Stoll BJ, Hansen NI, Adams-Chapman I, Fanaroff AA, Hintz SR, Vohr B,
et al. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Neonatal
Research Network. Neurodevelopmental and growth impairment among
extremely low-birth-weight infants with neonatal infection. The Journal of
American Medical Association [Internet]. 2004 (Cited 2015 Jan 28);
292(19):
2357-2365.
Available
from:
http://jama.jamanetwork.com/article.aspx?articleid=199811
32. Stoll BJ, Hansen N, Fanaroff AA, Wright LL, Carlo WA, Ehrenkranz RA,
Poole, WK, et al. Changes in pathogens causing early-onset sepsis in verylow-birth-weight infants. New England Journal of Medicine [Internet].
58
2002
(Cited 2015 Jan 25);
347(4):
240-247. Available from:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12140299
33. Spitzer AR, Kirkby S, Kornhauser M. Practice variation in suspected
neonatal sepsis: a costly problem in neonatal intensive care. Journal of
perinatology [Internet]. 2005 (Cited 2014 Nov 11); 25(4): 265-269.
Available
from:
http://www.nature.com/jp/journal/v25/n4/full/7211252a.html
34. Onyedibe KI, Utoh-Nedosa AU, Okolo M, Onyedibe KIO, Ita OI, Udoh U.
A, Egah, DZ, et al. Impact of socioeconomic factors on neonatal sepsis in
Jos, Nigeria. Jos Journal of Medicine [Internet]. 2012 (Cited 2015 Jan 29);
6(2):
54-58.
Available
from:
http://www.ajol.info/index.php/jjm/article/view/81871
35. Fikree FF, Ali TS, Durocher JM, Rahbar MH. Newborn care practices in
low socioeconomic settlements of Karachi, Pakistan. Social science &
medicine [Internet]. 2005 (Cited 2015 Jan 29); 60(5): 911-921. Avaiable
from:
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953604003193
36. Klinger G, Levy I, Sirota L, Boyko V, Reichman B, Lerner-Geva L, Israel.
Neonatal network epidemiology and risk factors for early onset sepsis
among very-low-birthweight infants. American journal of obstetrics and
gynecology [Internet]. 2009 (Cited 2014 Nov 25); 201(1): 38-e1. Available
from: http://www.ajog.org/article/S0002-9378%2809%2900240-3/abstract
59
37. Carolus W, Rompis J, & Wilar R. Hubungan Apgar skor dan berat badan
lahir dengan sepsis neonatorum. e-CliniC [Internet]. 2013 (Cited 2014 Dec
4);
1(2).
Available
from:
http://ejournal.unsrat.ac.id/index.php/eclinic/article/view/3271/2815
38. Roeslani RD, Amir I, Nasrulloh MH, Suryani. Penelitian Awal: faktor
risiko pada sepsis neonatorum awitan dini. Sari Pediatri [Internet]. 2013
(Cited 2015 Feb 6); 14(6): 363-8. Available from:
http://saripediatri.idai.or.id/abstrak.asp?q=872
39. Sastroasmoro S, Ismael S. Dasar-dasar metodologi penelitian klinis. Edisi
4 – cetakan keempat. Jakarta: Sagung Seto; 2011.
40. Dahlan, M Sopiyudin. Statistik untuk kedokteran dan kesehatan:
deskriptif, bivariat dan multivariat. Edisi 5 – cetakan ketiga. Jakarta:
Salemba Medika; 2013.
41. Khair K, Rahman MA, Sultana T, Roy CK, Rahman MQ, Shaidullah M,
dkk. Role of hematologic scoring system in early diagnosis of neonatal
septicemia. BSSMU J [Internet]. 2010 (Cited 2015 Jun 21); 3:62-7.
42. Yuliana N, Usman A. Sensitivitas dan spesifitas pemeriksaan leukosit dan
trombosit pada sepsis neonatorum di RSUP Dr. Hasan Sadikin Bandung
periode Juli-Desember 2006. Dalam: Sadjimin T, Juffrie M, Julia M,
Wibowo T, penyunting. Buku Abstrak PIT IKA III-IDAI Yogyakarta:
IDAI; 2007. h.27.
60
43. Utomo Mt. Risk factor of neonatal sepsis: A preliminary study in Dr.
Soetomo Hospital. Indonesian Journal of Tropical and Infectious Disease.
Vol.1, No.1. January-April 2010: 25-6.
44. Putra PJ. Insiden dan faktor-faktor yang berhubungan dengan sepsis
neonatus di RSUP Sanglah. Sari Pediatri, Vol. 14, No.3. Oktober
2015:207.
45. Scharg SJ, Hadler JI, Arnold KE. Risk factors for invasive, early onset
Eschericia coli infection in the era of wide spread intrapartum antibiotic
use. Pediatrics 118 [Internet]. 2006 (Cited 2015 Jun 21): 570-6.
46. Simbolon D. Faktor risiko sepsis pada bayi baru lahir di RSND Curup
Kab. Rejang Lebong. Diunduh dari:
http://isjd.pdii.lipi.go.id/admin/jurnal/36308127134_0125-9695.pdf
Diakses: 21 Juni 2015
47. Dawodu A, Al Umran K, Twum-Danso K. A case control study of
neonatal sepsis: Experience from Saudi Arabia. Journal of Tropical
Pediatrics, Oxford Journal [Internet]. 1997 (Cited 2015 Jun 21); 43(2):848.
48. Yumei Li, Wenli Zhou, Jiantao Zhang, Chaoying Yan. Clinical analyses
of neonatal sepsis caused by Listeria monocytogene. Human Health and
Biomedical Engineering (HHBE) [Internet]. 2011 (Cited 2015 Jun 21):
388-90.
49. Bizzarro MJ, Shabanova V, Baltimore RS, Dembry LM, Ehrenkranz RA,
Gallagher PG. Neonatal sepsis 2004-2013: the rise and fall of coagulase-
61
negative staphylococci. Pubmed [Internet]. 2015 (Cited 2015 Jun 25);
166(5): 1193-9. Available from:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25919728
50. Orlando Regional Health Care, Education and Development. Neonatal
sepsis self learning pocket 2002. Diunduh dari:
http://www.orhs.org/clasees/nursing/sepsis02pdf. Diakses 21 Juni 2015.
62
LAMPIRAN 1. ETHICHAL CLEARANCE
63
LAMPIRAN 2. SURAT IZIN PENELITIAN
64
LAMPIRAN 3. Hasil analisis SPSS
TABEL 6
JenisKelamin * SNAW Crosstabulation
SNAW
tidak sepsis
Count
Total
sepsis
22
21
43
21,5
21,5
43,0
28
29
57
28,5
28,5
57,0
50
50
100
50,0
50,0
100,0
laki-laki
Expected Count
JenisKelamin
Count
perempuan
Expected Count
Count
Total
Expected Count
Chi-Square Tests
Value
df
Asymp. Sig. (2-
Exact Sig. (2-
Exact Sig. (1-
sided)
sided)
sided)
,041a
1
,840
Continuity Correctionb
,000
1
1,000
Likelihood Ratio
,041
1
,840
Pearson Chi-Square
Fisher's Exact Test
1,000
Linear-by-Linear Association
,040
N of Valid Cases
100
1
,841
a. 0 cells (,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 21,50.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
,500
65
MetodePersalinan * SNAW Crosstabulation
SNAW
tidak sepsis
Count
Total
sepsis
29
22
51
25,5
25,5
51,0
21
28
49
24,5
24,5
49,0
50
50
100
50,0
50,0
100,0
pervaginam
Expected Count
MetodePersalinan
Count
SCTP
Expected Count
Count
Total
Expected Count
Chi-Square Tests
Value
Pearson Chi-Square
Continuity
Correctionb
Likelihood Ratio
df
Asymp. Sig. (2-
Exact Sig. (2-
Exact Sig.
sided)
sided)
(1-sided)
1,961a
1
,161
1,441
1
,230
1,967
1
,161
Fisher's Exact Test
Linear-by-Linear Association
N of Valid Cases
,230
1,941
1
,164
100
a. 0 cells (,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 24,50.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
,115
66
TABEL 7
Descriptives
SNAW
Statistic
Mean
28,80
Lower Bound
26,62
Upper Bound
30,98
Std. Error
1,084
95% Confidence Interval for Mean
5% Trimmed Mean
28,59
Median
28,50
Variance
tidak sepsis
58,735
Std. Deviation
7,664
Minimum
16
Maximum
46
Range
30
Interquartile Range
11
Skewness
,439
,337
Kurtosis
-,371
,662
Mean
29,78
,938
UsiaIbu
Lower Bound
27,89
Upper Bound
31,67
95% Confidence Interval for Mean
5% Trimmed Mean
29,88
Median
30,00
Variance
sepsis
Std. Deviation
44,012
6,634
Minimum
15
Maximum
42
Range
27
Interquartile Range
10
Skewness
-,118
,337
Kurtosis
-,639
,662
67
Tests of Normality
Kolmogorov-Smirnova
SNAW
Statistic
tidak sepsis
df
,078
Sig.
,102
Statistic
df
Sig.
50
,200*
,966
50
,157
50
,200*
,980
50
,572
UsiaIbu
sepsis
Shapiro-Wilk
*. This is a lower bound of the true significance.
a. Lilliefors Significance Correction
Independent Samples Test
Levene's Test for
t-test for Equality of Means
Equality of
Variances
F
Sig.
t
df
Sig. (2-
Mean
Std. Error
95% Confidence
tailed)
Difference
Difference
Interval of the
Difference
Lower
Equal
,557
variances
,457
-
Upper
98
,496
-,980
1,434
-3,825
1,865
- 96,028
,496
-,980
1,434
-3,825
1,865
,684
assumed
UsiaIbu
Equal
variances
assumed
not
,684
68
Crosstab
SNAW
tidak sepsis
Count
tidak diketahui
8
16
8,0
8,0
16,0
50,0%
50,0%
100,0%
Count
11
8
19
Expected Count
9,5
9,5
19,0
57,9%
42,1%
100,0%
8
10
18
9,0
9,0
18,0
44,4%
55,6%
100,0%
20
19
39
19,5
19,5
39,0
51,3%
48,7%
100,0%
3
5
8
4,0
4,0
8,0
37,5%
62,5%
100,0%
50
50
100
50,0
50,0
100,0
50,0%
50,0%
100,0%
Expected Count
% within PendidikanIbu
Count
PendidikanIbu
SMP
Expected Count
% within PendidikanIbu
Count
SMA
Expected Count
% within PendidikanIbu
Count
Diploma/Sarjana
Expected Count
% within PendidikanIbu
Count
Total
Expected Count
% within PendidikanIbu
Test Statisticsa
PendidikanIbu
Most Extreme Differences
Kolmogorov-Smirnov Z
Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed)
a. Grouping Variable: SNAW
sepsis
8
% within PendidikanIbu
SD
Total
Absolute
,060
Positive
,060
Negative
,000
,300
1,000
69
Crosstab
SNAW
tidak sepsis
Count
pelajar/mahasiswa
3
4
2,0
2,0
4,0
25,0%
75,0%
100,0%
34
29
63
31,5
31,5
63,0
54,0%
46,0%
100,0%
0
2
2
1,0
1,0
2,0
0,0%
100,0%
100,0%
12
12
24
12,0
12,0
24,0
50,0%
50,0%
100,0%
3
3
6
3,0
3,0
6,0
50,0%
50,0%
100,0%
Count
0
1
1
Expected Count
,5
,5
1,0
0,0%
100,0%
100,0%
50
50
100
50,0
50,0
100,0
50,0%
50,0%
100,0%
Expected Count
Count
Expected Count
% within PekerjaanIbu
Count
petani
sepsis
1
% within PekerjaanIbu
ibu rumah tangga
Total
Expected Count
% within PekerjaanIbu
PekerjaanIbu
Count
karyawan swasta
Expected Count
% within PekerjaanIbu
Count
wiraswasta
Expected Count
% within PekerjaanIbu
PNS
% within PekerjaanIbu
Count
Total
Expected Count
% within PekerjaanIbu
Test Statisticsa
PekerjaanIbu
Most Extreme Differences
Kolmogorov-Smirnov Z
Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed)
a. Grouping Variable: SNAW
Absolute
,060
Positive
,060
Negative
-,040
,300
1,000
70
TABEL 8
Crosstab
SNAW
tidak sepsis
Count
tidak ada
sepsis
39
40
79
39,5
39,5
79,0
49,4%
50,6%
100,0%
11
10
21
10,5
10,5
21,0
52,4%
47,6%
100,0%
50
50
100
50,0
50,0
100,0
50,0%
50,0%
100,0%
Expected Count
% within KPD
Total
KPD
Count
ada
Expected Count
% within KPD
Count
Total
Expected Count
% within KPD
Chi-Square Tests
Value
Pearson Chi-Square
Continuity
Correctionb
Likelihood Ratio
df
Asymp. Sig. (2-
Exact Sig. (2-
Exact Sig. (1-
sided)
sided)
sided)
,060a
1
,806
,000
1
1,000
,060
1
,806
Fisher's Exact Test
1,000
Linear-by-Linear Association
,060
N of Valid Cases
100
1
,807
a. 0 cells (,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 10,50.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
Risk Estimate
Value
95% Confidence Interval
Lower
Upper
Odds Ratio for KPD (tidak ada / ada)
,886
,338
2,323
For cohort SNAW = tidak sepsis
,942
,592
1,500
1,063
,646
1,751
For cohort SNAW = sepsis
N of Valid Cases
100
,500
71
TABEL 9
Crosstab
SNAW
tidak sepsis
Count
tidak ada
Total
sepsis
50
49
99
49,5
49,5
99,0
50,5%
49,5%
100,0%
Count
0
1
1
Expected Count
,5
,5
1,0
0,0%
100,0%
100,0%
50
50
100
50,0
50,0
100,0
50,0%
50,0%
100,0%
Expected Count
% within InfeksiSaatHamil
InfeksiSaatHamil
ada
% within InfeksiSaatHamil
Count
Total
Expected Count
% within InfeksiSaatHamil
Chi-Square Tests
Value
Pearson Chi-Square
Continuity
Correctionb
Likelihood Ratio
df
Asymp. Sig. (2-
Exact Sig. (2-
Exact Sig. (1-
sided)
sided)
sided)
1,010a
1
,315
,000
1
1,000
1,396
1
,237
Fisher's Exact Test
1,000
Linear-by-Linear Association
1,000
N of Valid Cases
1
,317
100
a. 2 cells (50,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is ,50.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
Risk Estimate
Value
95% Confidence Interval
Lower
For cohort SNAW = sepsis
,495
N of Valid Cases
100
,406
Upper
,604
,500
72
TABEL 10
Crosstab
SNAW
tidak sepsis
Count
kurang
sepsis
42
40
82
41,0
41,0
82,0
51,2%
48,8%
100,0%
8
10
18
9,0
9,0
18,0
44,4%
55,6%
100,0%
50
50
100
50,0
50,0
100,0
50,0%
50,0%
100,0%
Expected Count
% within Sosek
Total
Sosek
Count
cukup
Expected Count
% within Sosek
Count
Total
Expected Count
% within Sosek
Chi-Square Tests
Value
Pearson Chi-Square
Continuity
Correctionb
Likelihood Ratio
df
Asymp. Sig. (2-
Exact Sig. (2-
Exact Sig. (1-
sided)
sided)
sided)
,271a
1
,603
,068
1
,795
,271
1
,602
Fisher's Exact Test
,795
Linear-by-Linear Association
,268
N of Valid Cases
100
1
,604
a. 0 cells (,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 9,00.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
Risk Estimate
Value
95% Confidence Interval
Lower
Upper
Odds Ratio for Sosek (kurang / cukup)
1,313
,471
3,660
For cohort SNAW = tidak sepsis
1,152
,660
2,014
For cohort SNAW = sepsis
,878
,549
1,403
N of Valid Cases
100
,398
73
TABEL 11
Crosstab
SNAW
tidak sepsis
Count
tidak ada
Expected Count
% within GawatJanin
Total
sepsis
49
48
97
48,5
48,5
97,0
50,5%
49,5%
100,0%
1
2
3
1,5
1,5
3,0
33,3%
66,7%
100,0%
50
50
100
50,0
50,0
100,0
50,0%
50,0%
100,0%
GawatJanin
Count
ada
Expected Count
% within GawatJanin
Count
Total
Expected Count
% within GawatJanin
Chi-Square Tests
Value
Pearson Chi-Square
Continuity
Correctionb
Likelihood Ratio
df
Asymp. Sig. (2-
Exact Sig. (2-
Exact Sig. (1-
sided)
sided)
sided)
,344a
1
,558
,000
1
1,000
,350
1
,554
Fisher's Exact Test
1,000
Linear-by-Linear Association
,340
N of Valid Cases
100
1
,560
a. 2 cells (50,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 1,50.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
Risk Estimate
Value
95% Confidence Interval
Lower
Upper
Odds Ratio for GawatJanin (tidak ada / ada)
2,042
,179
23,266
For cohort SNAW = tidak sepsis
1,515
,302
7,600
For cohort SNAW = sepsis
,742
,325
1,694
N of Valid Cases
100
,500
74
TABEL 12
Crosstab
SNAW
tidak sepsis
Count
BBLR
sepsis
29
31
60
30,0
30,0
60,0
48,3%
51,7%
100,0%
21
19
40
20,0
20,0
40,0
52,5%
47,5%
100,0%
50
50
100
50,0
50,0
100,0
50,0%
50,0%
100,0%
Expected Count
% within BBL
Total
BBL
Count
BBLSR
Expected Count
% within BBL
Count
Total
Expected Count
% within BBL
Chi-Square Tests
Value
Pearson Chi-Square
Continuity
Correctionb
Likelihood Ratio
df
Asymp. Sig. (2-
Exact Sig. (2-
Exact Sig. (1-
sided)
sided)
sided)
,167a
1
,683
,042
1
,838
,167
1
,683
Fisher's Exact Test
,838
Linear-by-Linear Association
,165
N of Valid Cases
100
1
,685
a. 0 cells (,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 20,00.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
Risk Estimate
Value
95% Confidence Interval
Lower
Upper
Odds Ratio for BBL (BBLR / BBLSR)
,846
,380
1,885
For cohort SNAW = tidak sepsis
,921
,621
1,365
1,088
,724
1,635
For cohort SNAW = sepsis
N of Valid Cases
100
,419
75
TABEL 13
Crosstab
SNAW
tidak sepsis
Count
tidak rendah
sepsis
25
14
39
19,5
19,5
39,0
64,1%
35,9%
100,0%
25
36
61
30,5
30,5
61,0
41,0%
59,0%
100,0%
50
50
100
50,0
50,0
100,0
50,0%
50,0%
100,0%
Expected Count
% within SkorApgar_1
Total
SkorApgar_1
Count
rendah
Expected Count
% within SkorApgar_1
Count
Total
Expected Count
% within SkorApgar_1
Chi-Square Tests
Value
Pearson Chi-Square
Continuity
Correctionb
Likelihood Ratio
df
Asymp. Sig. (2-
Exact Sig. (2-
Exact Sig. (1-
sided)
sided)
sided)
5,086a
1
,024
4,203
1
,040
5,140
1
,023
Fisher's Exact Test
Linear-by-Linear Association
N of Valid Cases
,040
5,035
1
,025
100
a. 0 cells (,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 19,50.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
Risk Estimate
Value
95% Confidence Interval
Lower
Upper
Odds Ratio for SkorApgar_1 (tidak rendah / rendah)
2,571
1,122
5,895
For cohort SNAW = tidak sepsis
1,564
1,068
2,291
For cohort SNAW = sepsis
,608
,381
,972
N of Valid Cases
100
,020
76
TABEL 14
Crosstab
SNAW
tidak sepsis
Count
tidak rendah
sepsis
39
29
68
34,0
34,0
68,0
57,4%
42,6%
100,0%
11
21
32
16,0
16,0
32,0
34,4%
65,6%
100,0%
50
50
100
50,0
50,0
100,0
50,0%
50,0%
100,0%
Expected Count
% within SkorApgar_5
Total
SkorApgar_5
Count
rendah
Expected Count
% within SkorApgar_5
Count
Total
Expected Count
% within SkorApgar_5
Chi-Square Tests
Value
Pearson Chi-Square
Continuity
Correctionb
Likelihood Ratio
df
Asymp. Sig. (2-
Exact Sig. (2-
Exact Sig. (1-
sided)
sided)
sided)
4,596a
1
,032
3,722
1
,054
4,654
1
,031
Fisher's Exact Test
Linear-by-Linear Association
N of Valid Cases
,053
4,550
1
,033
100
a. 0 cells (,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 16,00.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
Risk Estimate
Value
95% Confidence Interval
Lower
Upper
Odds Ratio for SkorApgar_5 (tidak rendah / rendah)
2,567
1,072
6,150
For cohort SNAW = tidak sepsis
1,668
,991
2,808
For cohort SNAW = sepsis
,650
,448
,943
N of Valid Cases
100
,026
77
ANALISIS MULTIVARIAT
Variables in the Equation
B
S.E.
Wald
df
Sig.
Exp(B)
95% C.I.for
EXP(B)
Lower
Step
1a
SkorApgar_1(1)
-,649
,500
1,687
1
,194
,523
,196
1,391
SkorApgar_5(1)
-,578
,526
1,206
1
,272
,561
,200
1,573
,647
,372
3,018
1
,082
1,909
-,944
,423
4,978
1
,026
,389
,170
,892
,365
,260
1,962
1
,161
1,440
Constant
Step
2a
Upper
SkorApgar_1(1)
Constant
a. Variable(s) entered on step 1: SkorApgar_1, SkorApgar_5.
Model if Term Removed
Variable
Model Log
Change in -2 Log
Likelihood
Likelihood
df
Sig. of the Change
SkorApgar_1
-66,988
1,704
1
,192
SkorApgar_5
-66,745
1,218
1
,270
SkorApgar_1
-69,315
5,140
1
,023
Step 1
Step 2
Variables not in the Equation
Score
Step 2a
Variables
SkorApgar_5(1)
Overall Statistics
a. Variable(s) removed on step 2: SkorApgar_5.
df
Sig.
1,215
1
,270
1,215
1
,270
78
LAMPIRAN 4. DOKUMENTASI
79
LAMPIRAN 5. BIODATA PENULIS
Nama
: Novrika Dwi Ningrum
NIM
: 22010111120053
Tempat/Tanggal lahir : Purwakarta/ 28 November 1993
Jenis Kelamin
: Perempuan
Alamat
: Jalan Taman Pahlawan No. 24 Purwakarta
Nomor Telepon/HP
: 085659911099
Email
: novrikadwiningrum@yahoo.co.id
RIWAYAT PENDIDIKAN FORMAL
1. TK : TK PURNAMA PURWAKARTA (1998-2000)
2. SD : SDN 1 NAGRIKALER PURWAKARTA (2000-2006)
3. SMP : SMPN 1 PURWAKARTA (Lulus Tahun: 2008)
4. SMA : SMAN 1 PURWAKARTA (Lulus Tahun: 2011)
5. FK UNDIP (Masuk Tahun: 2011)
KEANGGOTAAN ORGANISASI
1. PASKIBRA SDN 1 NAGRIKALER PURWAKARTA 2004-2006
2. PASKIBRA SMPN 1 PURWAKARTA 2006-2008
3. PMR SMPN 1 PURWAKARTA 2007-2008
4. PASKIBRA SMAN 1 PURWAKARTA 2009-2010
5. MPK SMAN 1 PURWAKARTA 2009-2010
6. BEM FK UNDIP Departemen Hubungan Luar 2012
7. BEM FK UNDIP Departemen Hubungan Luar 2013
1. Oza S, Lawn JE, Hogan DR, Mathers C, Cousens SN. Neonatal cause-ofdeath estimates for the early and late neonatal periods for 194 countries:
2000–2013. Bulletin of the World Health Organization [Internet]. 2015
(Cited
2015
Feb
23);
93(1):
19-28.
Available
from:
http://www.who.int/bulletin/volumes/93/1/14-139790/en/
2. Badan Penelitian dan Pengembangan Kesehatan Departemen Kesehatan
Republik Indonesia. Riset Kesehatan Dasar 2007. Desember 2008. Bab
3.10. h.278-9
3. Sitohang S, Budijanto D, Hardhana B, Soenardi TA, editor. Kementerian
Kesehatan Republik Indonesia. Buku Profil Kesehatan Indonesia Tahun
2013. Jakarta: 2014. Bab 5. h.87
4. Janjindamai W, Petpisal S. Time to positivity on blood culture in newborn
infants. Southeast As J Trop Med Public Health [Internet]. 2006 (Cited 2015
July 5); 37: 171-5.
5. Unicef. Levels and Trends in Child Mortality 2014: Report 2014 Estimates
developed by the UN inter-agency group for children mortality estimation.
2014. h.15
6. Berry A, Rosenkrantz T, et al. Neonatal sepsis [Internet]. 2014 [Updated:
Feb
11;
Cited
2014
Nov
12).
Available
http://emedicine.medscape.com/article/978352-overview
53
from:
54
7. Sepsis in Neonates. Neonatal Ehandbook. [Internet] Departement of Health,
Victoria, Australia. Updated: July 16, 2014 (Cited 2014 Nov 4). Available
from:
http://www.health.vic.gov.au/neonatalhandbook/infections/sepsis.htm
8. Gupta ML. Module for training of specialist in pediatrics on newborn care:
Module-A (Management of Common Neonatal Problems).
9. Kosim MS, Yunanto A, Dewi R, Sarosa GI, Usman A. Editor (2008). Ikatan
Dokter Anak Indonesia. Buku Ajar Neonatologi. Ed. 1. Badan Penerbit
IDAI. Jakarta. 2008. h.170-185
10. Tutut S. Sepsis pada neonatus (Sepsis neonatal). Sari Pediatri [Internet].
Agustus 2000 (Cited 2014 Nov 12); Vol.2, No.2: 96-102. Available from:
http://saripediatri.idai.or.id/abstrak.asp?q=145
11. Juniatiningsih A, Aminullah A, Firmansyah A. Profil mikroorganisme
penyebab sepsis neonatorum di Departement Ilmu Kesehatan Anak RSCM.
Sari Pediatri, Vol.10, No.1. Juni 2008: 61.
12. Rini AE, Meconium stained amniotic fluid as a risk factor of early onset
neonatal sepsis [dissertation]. Semarang: Universitas Diponegoro; 2010.
13. Anderson-Berry AL. Neonatal sepsis. [Internet]. 2014 (updated 2014 feb
11;
Cited
2014
Nov
10).
Available
from:
http://emedicine.medscape.com/article/978352-overview
14. Edwards MS. Clinical feature and diagnosis of sepsis in term and late
preterm infants [Internet]. Updated: January 31, 2014. (Cited 2014 Nov 25).
55
Available from: http://www.uptodate.com/contents/clinical-features-anddiagnosis-of-sepsis-in-term-and-late-preterm-infants
15. Rodrigo I. Changing patterns of neonatal sepsis. Sri Lanka J Child Health
[Internet]. 2002 (Cited 2015 Feb 23); 31: 3-8. Available from:
http://www.sljol.info/sljol/index.php/SLJCH/article/view/795
16. Russell ARB. Neonatal sepsis. Symposium: Neonatology [Internet]. 2010 (Cited
2014 Nov 17); 265-9. Available from: ScienceDirect.
17. Aminullah A, Gatot D, Kosim MS, Rohsiswatmo R, Indarso F, Dharma R.
(2007).
Penatalaksanaan
sepsis
neonatorum.
Jakarta:
Departemen
Kesehatan Republik Indonesia, 3-80.
18. Tsai CH, Chen YY, Wang KG, Chen CY, Chen CP. Characterictic of earlyonset neonatal sepsis caused by Escherichia coli. [Internet]. 2012 (Cited
2014 Nov 25); 51(1):26-30. Available from: ScienceDirect.
19. Haque KN. Neonatal sepsis in the very low birth weight preterm infants Part
1: Review of Patho-physiology. Journal of Medical Science [Internet]. 2010
(Cited
2015
Jan
26);
3(1):
1-10.
Available
from:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2891980/
20. Richard A and the Committee on fetus and Newborn. Management of
neonates with suspected or proven early-onset bacterial sepsis. Journal of
The American Academy of Pediatrics [Internet]. 2012 (Cited 2014 Dec 10);
129:
1006-1015.
Available
http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/129/5/1006.full
from:
56
21. Haque KN. Definitions of bloodstream infection in the newborn. Pediatric
Critical care medicine [Internet]. 2005 (Cited 2014 Niv 25 ); 6(3): S45-S49.
Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15857558
22. Wynn, J. L., & Wong, H. R. Pathophysiology and treatment of septic shock
in neonates. Clinics in perinatology [Internet]. 2010 (Cited 2015 jan
26);
37(2):
439-479.
Available
from:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2891980/
23. Aminullah A. Masalah terkini sepsis neonatorum. Dalam: Hegar B, Trihono
PP, Irfan EB penyunting. Update in neonatal infection. Naskah lengkap
pendidikan kedokteran berkelanjutan IKA XLVIII; 13-14 Desember 2005,
Jakarta, Indonesia. Jakarta: Balai Penerbit FK UI; 2005. H. 1-13.
24. Sales-santos M, Bunye MO. The complete blood count and hematologic
finding as criteria for neonatal sepsis. Makati medical center proceeding
[Internet]. 1995 (Cited 2015 Jan 25); 40-50.
25. Kumar Y, Qunibi M, Neal TJ, Yoxall CW. Time to positivity of neonatal
blood cultures. Archives of Disease in Childhood-Fetal and Neonatal
Edition [Internet]. 2001 (Cited 2015 Jan 25); 85(3): F182-F186. Available
from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1721335/
26. Shane AL, Stoll BJ. Neonatal sepsis: Progress towards improved
outcomes. Journal of Infection [Internet]. 2014 (Cited 2014 Nov 25 ); 68:
S24-S32. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24140138
57
27. Melville JM, Moss TJ. The immune consequences of preterm
birth. Frontiers in neuroscience [Internet]. 2013 (Cited 2015 Jan 29); 7.
Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23734091
28. Butler, Stith A, Behrman RE. Preterm Birth: Causes, Consequences, and
Prevention. National Academies Press, 2007.
29. Gerdes JS. Diagnosis and management of bacterial infections in the
neonate. Pediatric Clinics of North America [Internet]. 2004 (Cited 2015
Jan
29);
51(4),
939-959.
Available
from:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15275982
30. Arisandi ND. Faktor risiko dan kesamaan jenis kuman jalan lahir ibu dengan
kultur darah pada sepsis neonatal awitan dini [Dissertation]. Master
Program In Biomedical Science; 2008.
31. Stoll BJ, Hansen NI, Adams-Chapman I, Fanaroff AA, Hintz SR, Vohr B,
et al. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Neonatal
Research Network. Neurodevelopmental and growth impairment among
extremely low-birth-weight infants with neonatal infection. The Journal of
American Medical Association [Internet]. 2004 (Cited 2015 Jan 28);
292(19):
2357-2365.
Available
from:
http://jama.jamanetwork.com/article.aspx?articleid=199811
32. Stoll BJ, Hansen N, Fanaroff AA, Wright LL, Carlo WA, Ehrenkranz RA,
Poole, WK, et al. Changes in pathogens causing early-onset sepsis in verylow-birth-weight infants. New England Journal of Medicine [Internet].
58
2002
(Cited 2015 Jan 25);
347(4):
240-247. Available from:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12140299
33. Spitzer AR, Kirkby S, Kornhauser M. Practice variation in suspected
neonatal sepsis: a costly problem in neonatal intensive care. Journal of
perinatology [Internet]. 2005 (Cited 2014 Nov 11); 25(4): 265-269.
Available
from:
http://www.nature.com/jp/journal/v25/n4/full/7211252a.html
34. Onyedibe KI, Utoh-Nedosa AU, Okolo M, Onyedibe KIO, Ita OI, Udoh U.
A, Egah, DZ, et al. Impact of socioeconomic factors on neonatal sepsis in
Jos, Nigeria. Jos Journal of Medicine [Internet]. 2012 (Cited 2015 Jan 29);
6(2):
54-58.
Available
from:
http://www.ajol.info/index.php/jjm/article/view/81871
35. Fikree FF, Ali TS, Durocher JM, Rahbar MH. Newborn care practices in
low socioeconomic settlements of Karachi, Pakistan. Social science &
medicine [Internet]. 2005 (Cited 2015 Jan 29); 60(5): 911-921. Avaiable
from:
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953604003193
36. Klinger G, Levy I, Sirota L, Boyko V, Reichman B, Lerner-Geva L, Israel.
Neonatal network epidemiology and risk factors for early onset sepsis
among very-low-birthweight infants. American journal of obstetrics and
gynecology [Internet]. 2009 (Cited 2014 Nov 25); 201(1): 38-e1. Available
from: http://www.ajog.org/article/S0002-9378%2809%2900240-3/abstract
59
37. Carolus W, Rompis J, & Wilar R. Hubungan Apgar skor dan berat badan
lahir dengan sepsis neonatorum. e-CliniC [Internet]. 2013 (Cited 2014 Dec
4);
1(2).
Available
from:
http://ejournal.unsrat.ac.id/index.php/eclinic/article/view/3271/2815
38. Roeslani RD, Amir I, Nasrulloh MH, Suryani. Penelitian Awal: faktor
risiko pada sepsis neonatorum awitan dini. Sari Pediatri [Internet]. 2013
(Cited 2015 Feb 6); 14(6): 363-8. Available from:
http://saripediatri.idai.or.id/abstrak.asp?q=872
39. Sastroasmoro S, Ismael S. Dasar-dasar metodologi penelitian klinis. Edisi
4 – cetakan keempat. Jakarta: Sagung Seto; 2011.
40. Dahlan, M Sopiyudin. Statistik untuk kedokteran dan kesehatan:
deskriptif, bivariat dan multivariat. Edisi 5 – cetakan ketiga. Jakarta:
Salemba Medika; 2013.
41. Khair K, Rahman MA, Sultana T, Roy CK, Rahman MQ, Shaidullah M,
dkk. Role of hematologic scoring system in early diagnosis of neonatal
septicemia. BSSMU J [Internet]. 2010 (Cited 2015 Jun 21); 3:62-7.
42. Yuliana N, Usman A. Sensitivitas dan spesifitas pemeriksaan leukosit dan
trombosit pada sepsis neonatorum di RSUP Dr. Hasan Sadikin Bandung
periode Juli-Desember 2006. Dalam: Sadjimin T, Juffrie M, Julia M,
Wibowo T, penyunting. Buku Abstrak PIT IKA III-IDAI Yogyakarta:
IDAI; 2007. h.27.
60
43. Utomo Mt. Risk factor of neonatal sepsis: A preliminary study in Dr.
Soetomo Hospital. Indonesian Journal of Tropical and Infectious Disease.
Vol.1, No.1. January-April 2010: 25-6.
44. Putra PJ. Insiden dan faktor-faktor yang berhubungan dengan sepsis
neonatus di RSUP Sanglah. Sari Pediatri, Vol. 14, No.3. Oktober
2015:207.
45. Scharg SJ, Hadler JI, Arnold KE. Risk factors for invasive, early onset
Eschericia coli infection in the era of wide spread intrapartum antibiotic
use. Pediatrics 118 [Internet]. 2006 (Cited 2015 Jun 21): 570-6.
46. Simbolon D. Faktor risiko sepsis pada bayi baru lahir di RSND Curup
Kab. Rejang Lebong. Diunduh dari:
http://isjd.pdii.lipi.go.id/admin/jurnal/36308127134_0125-9695.pdf
Diakses: 21 Juni 2015
47. Dawodu A, Al Umran K, Twum-Danso K. A case control study of
neonatal sepsis: Experience from Saudi Arabia. Journal of Tropical
Pediatrics, Oxford Journal [Internet]. 1997 (Cited 2015 Jun 21); 43(2):848.
48. Yumei Li, Wenli Zhou, Jiantao Zhang, Chaoying Yan. Clinical analyses
of neonatal sepsis caused by Listeria monocytogene. Human Health and
Biomedical Engineering (HHBE) [Internet]. 2011 (Cited 2015 Jun 21):
388-90.
49. Bizzarro MJ, Shabanova V, Baltimore RS, Dembry LM, Ehrenkranz RA,
Gallagher PG. Neonatal sepsis 2004-2013: the rise and fall of coagulase-
61
negative staphylococci. Pubmed [Internet]. 2015 (Cited 2015 Jun 25);
166(5): 1193-9. Available from:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25919728
50. Orlando Regional Health Care, Education and Development. Neonatal
sepsis self learning pocket 2002. Diunduh dari:
http://www.orhs.org/clasees/nursing/sepsis02pdf. Diakses 21 Juni 2015.
62
LAMPIRAN 1. ETHICHAL CLEARANCE
63
LAMPIRAN 2. SURAT IZIN PENELITIAN
64
LAMPIRAN 3. Hasil analisis SPSS
TABEL 6
JenisKelamin * SNAW Crosstabulation
SNAW
tidak sepsis
Count
Total
sepsis
22
21
43
21,5
21,5
43,0
28
29
57
28,5
28,5
57,0
50
50
100
50,0
50,0
100,0
laki-laki
Expected Count
JenisKelamin
Count
perempuan
Expected Count
Count
Total
Expected Count
Chi-Square Tests
Value
df
Asymp. Sig. (2-
Exact Sig. (2-
Exact Sig. (1-
sided)
sided)
sided)
,041a
1
,840
Continuity Correctionb
,000
1
1,000
Likelihood Ratio
,041
1
,840
Pearson Chi-Square
Fisher's Exact Test
1,000
Linear-by-Linear Association
,040
N of Valid Cases
100
1
,841
a. 0 cells (,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 21,50.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
,500
65
MetodePersalinan * SNAW Crosstabulation
SNAW
tidak sepsis
Count
Total
sepsis
29
22
51
25,5
25,5
51,0
21
28
49
24,5
24,5
49,0
50
50
100
50,0
50,0
100,0
pervaginam
Expected Count
MetodePersalinan
Count
SCTP
Expected Count
Count
Total
Expected Count
Chi-Square Tests
Value
Pearson Chi-Square
Continuity
Correctionb
Likelihood Ratio
df
Asymp. Sig. (2-
Exact Sig. (2-
Exact Sig.
sided)
sided)
(1-sided)
1,961a
1
,161
1,441
1
,230
1,967
1
,161
Fisher's Exact Test
Linear-by-Linear Association
N of Valid Cases
,230
1,941
1
,164
100
a. 0 cells (,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 24,50.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
,115
66
TABEL 7
Descriptives
SNAW
Statistic
Mean
28,80
Lower Bound
26,62
Upper Bound
30,98
Std. Error
1,084
95% Confidence Interval for Mean
5% Trimmed Mean
28,59
Median
28,50
Variance
tidak sepsis
58,735
Std. Deviation
7,664
Minimum
16
Maximum
46
Range
30
Interquartile Range
11
Skewness
,439
,337
Kurtosis
-,371
,662
Mean
29,78
,938
UsiaIbu
Lower Bound
27,89
Upper Bound
31,67
95% Confidence Interval for Mean
5% Trimmed Mean
29,88
Median
30,00
Variance
sepsis
Std. Deviation
44,012
6,634
Minimum
15
Maximum
42
Range
27
Interquartile Range
10
Skewness
-,118
,337
Kurtosis
-,639
,662
67
Tests of Normality
Kolmogorov-Smirnova
SNAW
Statistic
tidak sepsis
df
,078
Sig.
,102
Statistic
df
Sig.
50
,200*
,966
50
,157
50
,200*
,980
50
,572
UsiaIbu
sepsis
Shapiro-Wilk
*. This is a lower bound of the true significance.
a. Lilliefors Significance Correction
Independent Samples Test
Levene's Test for
t-test for Equality of Means
Equality of
Variances
F
Sig.
t
df
Sig. (2-
Mean
Std. Error
95% Confidence
tailed)
Difference
Difference
Interval of the
Difference
Lower
Equal
,557
variances
,457
-
Upper
98
,496
-,980
1,434
-3,825
1,865
- 96,028
,496
-,980
1,434
-3,825
1,865
,684
assumed
UsiaIbu
Equal
variances
assumed
not
,684
68
Crosstab
SNAW
tidak sepsis
Count
tidak diketahui
8
16
8,0
8,0
16,0
50,0%
50,0%
100,0%
Count
11
8
19
Expected Count
9,5
9,5
19,0
57,9%
42,1%
100,0%
8
10
18
9,0
9,0
18,0
44,4%
55,6%
100,0%
20
19
39
19,5
19,5
39,0
51,3%
48,7%
100,0%
3
5
8
4,0
4,0
8,0
37,5%
62,5%
100,0%
50
50
100
50,0
50,0
100,0
50,0%
50,0%
100,0%
Expected Count
% within PendidikanIbu
Count
PendidikanIbu
SMP
Expected Count
% within PendidikanIbu
Count
SMA
Expected Count
% within PendidikanIbu
Count
Diploma/Sarjana
Expected Count
% within PendidikanIbu
Count
Total
Expected Count
% within PendidikanIbu
Test Statisticsa
PendidikanIbu
Most Extreme Differences
Kolmogorov-Smirnov Z
Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed)
a. Grouping Variable: SNAW
sepsis
8
% within PendidikanIbu
SD
Total
Absolute
,060
Positive
,060
Negative
,000
,300
1,000
69
Crosstab
SNAW
tidak sepsis
Count
pelajar/mahasiswa
3
4
2,0
2,0
4,0
25,0%
75,0%
100,0%
34
29
63
31,5
31,5
63,0
54,0%
46,0%
100,0%
0
2
2
1,0
1,0
2,0
0,0%
100,0%
100,0%
12
12
24
12,0
12,0
24,0
50,0%
50,0%
100,0%
3
3
6
3,0
3,0
6,0
50,0%
50,0%
100,0%
Count
0
1
1
Expected Count
,5
,5
1,0
0,0%
100,0%
100,0%
50
50
100
50,0
50,0
100,0
50,0%
50,0%
100,0%
Expected Count
Count
Expected Count
% within PekerjaanIbu
Count
petani
sepsis
1
% within PekerjaanIbu
ibu rumah tangga
Total
Expected Count
% within PekerjaanIbu
PekerjaanIbu
Count
karyawan swasta
Expected Count
% within PekerjaanIbu
Count
wiraswasta
Expected Count
% within PekerjaanIbu
PNS
% within PekerjaanIbu
Count
Total
Expected Count
% within PekerjaanIbu
Test Statisticsa
PekerjaanIbu
Most Extreme Differences
Kolmogorov-Smirnov Z
Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed)
a. Grouping Variable: SNAW
Absolute
,060
Positive
,060
Negative
-,040
,300
1,000
70
TABEL 8
Crosstab
SNAW
tidak sepsis
Count
tidak ada
sepsis
39
40
79
39,5
39,5
79,0
49,4%
50,6%
100,0%
11
10
21
10,5
10,5
21,0
52,4%
47,6%
100,0%
50
50
100
50,0
50,0
100,0
50,0%
50,0%
100,0%
Expected Count
% within KPD
Total
KPD
Count
ada
Expected Count
% within KPD
Count
Total
Expected Count
% within KPD
Chi-Square Tests
Value
Pearson Chi-Square
Continuity
Correctionb
Likelihood Ratio
df
Asymp. Sig. (2-
Exact Sig. (2-
Exact Sig. (1-
sided)
sided)
sided)
,060a
1
,806
,000
1
1,000
,060
1
,806
Fisher's Exact Test
1,000
Linear-by-Linear Association
,060
N of Valid Cases
100
1
,807
a. 0 cells (,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 10,50.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
Risk Estimate
Value
95% Confidence Interval
Lower
Upper
Odds Ratio for KPD (tidak ada / ada)
,886
,338
2,323
For cohort SNAW = tidak sepsis
,942
,592
1,500
1,063
,646
1,751
For cohort SNAW = sepsis
N of Valid Cases
100
,500
71
TABEL 9
Crosstab
SNAW
tidak sepsis
Count
tidak ada
Total
sepsis
50
49
99
49,5
49,5
99,0
50,5%
49,5%
100,0%
Count
0
1
1
Expected Count
,5
,5
1,0
0,0%
100,0%
100,0%
50
50
100
50,0
50,0
100,0
50,0%
50,0%
100,0%
Expected Count
% within InfeksiSaatHamil
InfeksiSaatHamil
ada
% within InfeksiSaatHamil
Count
Total
Expected Count
% within InfeksiSaatHamil
Chi-Square Tests
Value
Pearson Chi-Square
Continuity
Correctionb
Likelihood Ratio
df
Asymp. Sig. (2-
Exact Sig. (2-
Exact Sig. (1-
sided)
sided)
sided)
1,010a
1
,315
,000
1
1,000
1,396
1
,237
Fisher's Exact Test
1,000
Linear-by-Linear Association
1,000
N of Valid Cases
1
,317
100
a. 2 cells (50,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is ,50.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
Risk Estimate
Value
95% Confidence Interval
Lower
For cohort SNAW = sepsis
,495
N of Valid Cases
100
,406
Upper
,604
,500
72
TABEL 10
Crosstab
SNAW
tidak sepsis
Count
kurang
sepsis
42
40
82
41,0
41,0
82,0
51,2%
48,8%
100,0%
8
10
18
9,0
9,0
18,0
44,4%
55,6%
100,0%
50
50
100
50,0
50,0
100,0
50,0%
50,0%
100,0%
Expected Count
% within Sosek
Total
Sosek
Count
cukup
Expected Count
% within Sosek
Count
Total
Expected Count
% within Sosek
Chi-Square Tests
Value
Pearson Chi-Square
Continuity
Correctionb
Likelihood Ratio
df
Asymp. Sig. (2-
Exact Sig. (2-
Exact Sig. (1-
sided)
sided)
sided)
,271a
1
,603
,068
1
,795
,271
1
,602
Fisher's Exact Test
,795
Linear-by-Linear Association
,268
N of Valid Cases
100
1
,604
a. 0 cells (,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 9,00.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
Risk Estimate
Value
95% Confidence Interval
Lower
Upper
Odds Ratio for Sosek (kurang / cukup)
1,313
,471
3,660
For cohort SNAW = tidak sepsis
1,152
,660
2,014
For cohort SNAW = sepsis
,878
,549
1,403
N of Valid Cases
100
,398
73
TABEL 11
Crosstab
SNAW
tidak sepsis
Count
tidak ada
Expected Count
% within GawatJanin
Total
sepsis
49
48
97
48,5
48,5
97,0
50,5%
49,5%
100,0%
1
2
3
1,5
1,5
3,0
33,3%
66,7%
100,0%
50
50
100
50,0
50,0
100,0
50,0%
50,0%
100,0%
GawatJanin
Count
ada
Expected Count
% within GawatJanin
Count
Total
Expected Count
% within GawatJanin
Chi-Square Tests
Value
Pearson Chi-Square
Continuity
Correctionb
Likelihood Ratio
df
Asymp. Sig. (2-
Exact Sig. (2-
Exact Sig. (1-
sided)
sided)
sided)
,344a
1
,558
,000
1
1,000
,350
1
,554
Fisher's Exact Test
1,000
Linear-by-Linear Association
,340
N of Valid Cases
100
1
,560
a. 2 cells (50,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 1,50.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
Risk Estimate
Value
95% Confidence Interval
Lower
Upper
Odds Ratio for GawatJanin (tidak ada / ada)
2,042
,179
23,266
For cohort SNAW = tidak sepsis
1,515
,302
7,600
For cohort SNAW = sepsis
,742
,325
1,694
N of Valid Cases
100
,500
74
TABEL 12
Crosstab
SNAW
tidak sepsis
Count
BBLR
sepsis
29
31
60
30,0
30,0
60,0
48,3%
51,7%
100,0%
21
19
40
20,0
20,0
40,0
52,5%
47,5%
100,0%
50
50
100
50,0
50,0
100,0
50,0%
50,0%
100,0%
Expected Count
% within BBL
Total
BBL
Count
BBLSR
Expected Count
% within BBL
Count
Total
Expected Count
% within BBL
Chi-Square Tests
Value
Pearson Chi-Square
Continuity
Correctionb
Likelihood Ratio
df
Asymp. Sig. (2-
Exact Sig. (2-
Exact Sig. (1-
sided)
sided)
sided)
,167a
1
,683
,042
1
,838
,167
1
,683
Fisher's Exact Test
,838
Linear-by-Linear Association
,165
N of Valid Cases
100
1
,685
a. 0 cells (,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 20,00.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
Risk Estimate
Value
95% Confidence Interval
Lower
Upper
Odds Ratio for BBL (BBLR / BBLSR)
,846
,380
1,885
For cohort SNAW = tidak sepsis
,921
,621
1,365
1,088
,724
1,635
For cohort SNAW = sepsis
N of Valid Cases
100
,419
75
TABEL 13
Crosstab
SNAW
tidak sepsis
Count
tidak rendah
sepsis
25
14
39
19,5
19,5
39,0
64,1%
35,9%
100,0%
25
36
61
30,5
30,5
61,0
41,0%
59,0%
100,0%
50
50
100
50,0
50,0
100,0
50,0%
50,0%
100,0%
Expected Count
% within SkorApgar_1
Total
SkorApgar_1
Count
rendah
Expected Count
% within SkorApgar_1
Count
Total
Expected Count
% within SkorApgar_1
Chi-Square Tests
Value
Pearson Chi-Square
Continuity
Correctionb
Likelihood Ratio
df
Asymp. Sig. (2-
Exact Sig. (2-
Exact Sig. (1-
sided)
sided)
sided)
5,086a
1
,024
4,203
1
,040
5,140
1
,023
Fisher's Exact Test
Linear-by-Linear Association
N of Valid Cases
,040
5,035
1
,025
100
a. 0 cells (,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 19,50.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
Risk Estimate
Value
95% Confidence Interval
Lower
Upper
Odds Ratio for SkorApgar_1 (tidak rendah / rendah)
2,571
1,122
5,895
For cohort SNAW = tidak sepsis
1,564
1,068
2,291
For cohort SNAW = sepsis
,608
,381
,972
N of Valid Cases
100
,020
76
TABEL 14
Crosstab
SNAW
tidak sepsis
Count
tidak rendah
sepsis
39
29
68
34,0
34,0
68,0
57,4%
42,6%
100,0%
11
21
32
16,0
16,0
32,0
34,4%
65,6%
100,0%
50
50
100
50,0
50,0
100,0
50,0%
50,0%
100,0%
Expected Count
% within SkorApgar_5
Total
SkorApgar_5
Count
rendah
Expected Count
% within SkorApgar_5
Count
Total
Expected Count
% within SkorApgar_5
Chi-Square Tests
Value
Pearson Chi-Square
Continuity
Correctionb
Likelihood Ratio
df
Asymp. Sig. (2-
Exact Sig. (2-
Exact Sig. (1-
sided)
sided)
sided)
4,596a
1
,032
3,722
1
,054
4,654
1
,031
Fisher's Exact Test
Linear-by-Linear Association
N of Valid Cases
,053
4,550
1
,033
100
a. 0 cells (,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 16,00.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
Risk Estimate
Value
95% Confidence Interval
Lower
Upper
Odds Ratio for SkorApgar_5 (tidak rendah / rendah)
2,567
1,072
6,150
For cohort SNAW = tidak sepsis
1,668
,991
2,808
For cohort SNAW = sepsis
,650
,448
,943
N of Valid Cases
100
,026
77
ANALISIS MULTIVARIAT
Variables in the Equation
B
S.E.
Wald
df
Sig.
Exp(B)
95% C.I.for
EXP(B)
Lower
Step
1a
SkorApgar_1(1)
-,649
,500
1,687
1
,194
,523
,196
1,391
SkorApgar_5(1)
-,578
,526
1,206
1
,272
,561
,200
1,573
,647
,372
3,018
1
,082
1,909
-,944
,423
4,978
1
,026
,389
,170
,892
,365
,260
1,962
1
,161
1,440
Constant
Step
2a
Upper
SkorApgar_1(1)
Constant
a. Variable(s) entered on step 1: SkorApgar_1, SkorApgar_5.
Model if Term Removed
Variable
Model Log
Change in -2 Log
Likelihood
Likelihood
df
Sig. of the Change
SkorApgar_1
-66,988
1,704
1
,192
SkorApgar_5
-66,745
1,218
1
,270
SkorApgar_1
-69,315
5,140
1
,023
Step 1
Step 2
Variables not in the Equation
Score
Step 2a
Variables
SkorApgar_5(1)
Overall Statistics
a. Variable(s) removed on step 2: SkorApgar_5.
df
Sig.
1,215
1
,270
1,215
1
,270
78
LAMPIRAN 4. DOKUMENTASI
79
LAMPIRAN 5. BIODATA PENULIS
Nama
: Novrika Dwi Ningrum
NIM
: 22010111120053
Tempat/Tanggal lahir : Purwakarta/ 28 November 1993
Jenis Kelamin
: Perempuan
Alamat
: Jalan Taman Pahlawan No. 24 Purwakarta
Nomor Telepon/HP
: 085659911099
: novrikadwiningrum@yahoo.co.id
RIWAYAT PENDIDIKAN FORMAL
1. TK : TK PURNAMA PURWAKARTA (1998-2000)
2. SD : SDN 1 NAGRIKALER PURWAKARTA (2000-2006)
3. SMP : SMPN 1 PURWAKARTA (Lulus Tahun: 2008)
4. SMA : SMAN 1 PURWAKARTA (Lulus Tahun: 2011)
5. FK UNDIP (Masuk Tahun: 2011)
KEANGGOTAAN ORGANISASI
1. PASKIBRA SDN 1 NAGRIKALER PURWAKARTA 2004-2006
2. PASKIBRA SMPN 1 PURWAKARTA 2006-2008
3. PMR SMPN 1 PURWAKARTA 2007-2008
4. PASKIBRA SMAN 1 PURWAKARTA 2009-2010
5. MPK SMAN 1 PURWAKARTA 2009-2010
6. BEM FK UNDIP Departemen Hubungan Luar 2012
7. BEM FK UNDIP Departemen Hubungan Luar 2013