Institutional Repository | Satya Wacana Christian University: Students' Opinions about Language Learning Beliefs

ERRORS ANALYSIS ON INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY
STUDENTS’ WRITING

THESIS
Submitted in Partial Fulfillment
of the Requirements for the Degree of
Sarjana Pendidikan

Yutta Natasya Dyarenggasti
112007026

ENGLISH DEPARTMENT
FACULTY OF LANGUAGE AND LITERATURE
SATYA WACANA CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY
SALATIGA
2012

ERRORS ANALYSIS ON INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY
STUDENTS’ WRITING

THESIS

Submitted in Partial Fulfillment
of the Requirements for the Degree of
Sarjana Pendidikan

Yutta Natasya Dyarenggasti
112007026

ENGLISH DEPARTMENT
FACULTY OF LANGUAGE AND LITERATURE
SATYA WACANA CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY
SALATIGA
2012

ii

ERRORS ANALYSIS ON INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY
STUDENTS’ WRITING

THESIS
Submitted in Partial Fulfillment

of the Requirements for the Degree of
Sarjana Pendidikan

Yutta Natasya Dyarenggasti
112007026

Approved by:

Hendro Setiawan Husada, M. A
Supervisor

Prof. DR. Gusti Astika, M. A
Examiner

iii

COPYRIGHT STATEMENT

This thesis contains no such material as has been submitted for examination in any course
or accepted for the fulfillment of any degree or diploma in any university. To the best of

my knowledge and my belief, this contains no material previously published or written by
any other person except where due reference is made in the text.
Copyright@ 2012. Yutta Natasya Dyarenggasti and Hendro Setiawan Husada, M.A.
All rights reserved. No part of this thesis may be reproduced by any means without the
permission of at least one of the copyright owners or the English Department, Faculty of
Language and Literature, Satya Wacana Christian University, Salatiga.
Yutta Natasya Dyarenggasti:

v

PUBLICATION AGREEMENT DECLARATION

As a member of the (SWCU) Satya Wacana Christian University academic
community, I verify that:
Name
Student ID Number
Study Program
Faculty
Kind of Work


:
:
:
:
:

Yutta Natasya Dyarenggasti
112007026
English Department
Faculty of Language and Literature
Undergraduate Thesis

In developing my knowledge, I agree to provide SWCU with a non-exclusive royalty
free right for my intellectual property and the contents therein entitled :

Error Analysis on Information and Technology Students’
Writing
Along with any pertinent equipment.
With this non-exclusive royalty free right, SWCU maintains the right to copy,
reproduce, print, publish, post, display, incorporate, store in or scan into a retrieval

system or database, transmit, broadcast, barter or sell my intellectual property, in
whole or in part without my express written permission, as long as my name is still
included as the writer.
This declaration is made according to the best of my knowledge.
Made in : Salatiga
Date
: ________________
Verified by signee,
Yutta Natasya Dyarenggasti
Approved by
Thesis Supervisor

Thesis Examiner

Hendro Setiawan Husada, M. A

Prof. DR. Gusti Astika, M. A.

vi


ERRORS ANALYSIS ON INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY
STUDENTS’ WRITING

Yutta Natasya Dyarenggasti

Abstract
This study aimed to investigate the types of grammatical errors found in the Faculty
of Information and Technology students‟ writing. The data were collected from 20 essays
entitled “My Experience”. In analyzing the data, I used steps suggested by Corder (1974) as
cited in Ellis and Barkhuizen (2005). First, a native speaker teacher helped identify the
grammatical errors in the participants‟ work. Second, the errors would be classified based on
Linguistic Taxonomy proposed by Politzer and Ramirez (1973) as cited in Dulay, Burt and
Krashen (1982). Third, based on the identification of errors, each category of errors was
counted to find each propotion. Finally, each category of errors was explained and discussed.
The result of the study show that English tenses (190 errors or 30.60%) were found to be the
most common grammatical errors followed by errors in articles (155 errors or 24.96%),
prepositions (104 errors or 16.75%), singular/plurals (60 errors or 9.66%), subject-verb
agreements (57 errors or 9.18%), possessives (32 errors or 5.15%), and pronoun (23 errors
or 3.70%). This research concluded by discussing the pedagogical implication.


Key words: error analysis, grammatical error, linguistic taxonomy.

7