perangkat pembelajarananalysis trends science education

PSC-221

Analysis of Trends
in Science Education

Science Education
Zuhdan K. Prasetyo, Prof. Dr. M.Ed.

Science Education
Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences

Yogyakarta State University

Analysis of Trends
in Science Education

Science Education

Zuhdan K. Prasetyo, Prof. Dr. M.Ed.

Science Education

Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences

Yogyakarta State University

ii

PREFACE
This unit lessons was prepared to support courses Analysis of Trends in Science Education
for students of international class in science education Faculty of Mathematics and Natural
Sciences. This course is held in the even semester of the academic year 2014/2015. On this
occasion to say thank you for the trust Mr. Dean Faculty of Mathematics and Natural
Sciences Yogyakarta State University who have commissioned and allowed me to
administer this course.
I hope this unit lessons useful for all students for the development of education in
Indonesia. I apologize if this task many shortcomings.

Yogyakarta, February, 2015
Lecturer,

Zuhdan K. Prasetyo


ii

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Cover …………………………………………………………………………………………..……
Preface ……………………………………………………………………………………….….…

i
ii

Table of Contents ………………………………………………………………………………

iii

Lesson Plan …………………………………………………………………………….…………

6

Evaluation …………………………………………………………………………………………


12

Syllabus ……………………………………………………………………………………..……..

1

Course Material …………………………………………………………………………………

8

iii

YOGYAKARTA STATE UNIVERSITY
FACULTY OF MATHEMATICS AND NATURAL SCIENCES
Karangmalang, Yogyakarta.
SYLLABUS
Study Program

: Science Education


Course/ Code

: Analysis of Trends in Science Education/PSC - 221

Semester

: Even 2014/2015

Lecturer

:. Zuhdan K. Prasetyo

I.

:

Course Description
This course develops student competence in analysis of trends in science education, both in
USA and Indonesia. This course informs issues and trends in science education in two

countries.

II. Standard of Competence
After accomplish this course, students are able to describe trends and analysis of Science
Education of the world, particularly in USA and Indonesia.
III. Program of Teaching Learning Activity
Lectures conducted through the class with a variety of strategies including lectures,
discussions, presentations, question and answer, and individual assignment to support the
achievement of the expected competencies.

Attndnc
1

2

Basic
Competencies
Introduction

Understand and

explain issues
and trends in
science
education

Essentials Concept

Learning Strategy

References

Contract, regulation and
sanction.

Lectures and
discussion

A&B

Issues and Trends in

Science Education
(I&T in SE): USA,
Introductory

lectures,
discussions,
presentations,
question and
answer, and
individual
assignment

A&B

1

3

Understand and
explain issues and

trends in science
education

Issues and Trends in
Science Education
(I&T in SE): USA, The
Beginnings 1860 - 1920

lectures,
discussions,
presentations,
question and
answer, and
individual
assignment

A&B

4


Understand and
explain issues and
trends in science
education

Issues and Trends in
Science Education
(I&T in SE): USA,
Utilitarian/Textbook
1920 - 1957

lectures,
discussions,
presentations,
question and
answer, and
individual
assignment

A&B


5

Understand and
explain issues and
trends in science
education

Issues and Trends in
Science Education
(I&T in SE): USA, The
First Revolution in
Science Education 1957 1978

lectures,
discussions,
presentations,
question and
answer, and
individual

assignment

A&B

6

Understand and
explain issues and
trends in science
education

Issues and Trends in
Science Education
(I&T in SE): USA, The
Second Revolution in
Science Education 1980
– 1990an

lectures,
discussions,
presentations,
question and
answer, and
individual
assignment

A&B

7

Understand and
explain issues and
trends in science
education

Science Education Today

lectures,
discussions,
presentations,
question and
answer, and
individual
assignment

A&B

2

8

Understand and
explain issues and
trends in science
education

Cognitive Science and
Constructivism

lectures,
discussions,
presentations,
question and
answer, and
individual
assignment

A&B

9

Understand and
explain issues and
trends in science
education

Cooperative Learning

lectures,
discussions,
presentations,
question and
answer, and
individual
assignment

A&B

10

Understand and
explain issues and
trends in science
education

Technology

lectures,
discussions,
presentations,
question and
answer, and
individual
assignment

A&B

11

Understand and
explain issues and
trends in science
education

Gender and Cultural
Inequities in Science
Education

lectures,
discussions,
presentations,
question and
answer, and
individual
assignment

A&B

12

Understand and
explain issues and
trends in science
education

Assessment Reforms in
Science Education:
Alternative Assessment
(Autentic Assessment)

lectures,
discussions,
presentations,
question and
answer, and
individual
assignment

A&B

3

13

Understand and
explain issues and
trends in science
education

KTSP

lectures,
discussions,
presentations,
question and
answer, and
individual
assignment

A&B

14

Understand and
explain issues and
trends in science
education

KTSP

Presentation and
discussion

A&B

15

Understand and
explain issues and
trends in science
education

K-13

Presentation and
discussion

A&B

16

Understand and
explain issues and
trends in science
education

K-13

Case study,
Assignment

-

Final Exam

IV. References
A. Compulsory:
Check, Dennis W. (1992). Science Curriculum Resources Handbook: A Practical Guide
for K-12 Science Curriculum. New York: Kraus International Publications.
B. Additional:
Oliva, Peter F. 1992. Developing the Curriculum. New York: Harper Collin Publishers
Inc.

4

V. Evaluation
No.

Activities

Rate Percentage

1

Participation

10 %

2

Assignment

35 %

3

Presentation

30 %

4

Final exam

25 %

Yogyakarta, February, 2015
Lecturer,

Zuhdan K. Prasetyo

5

KEMENTERIAN PENDIDIKAN DAN KEBUDAYAAN
UNIVERSITAS NEGERI YOGYAKARTA
FAKULTAS MATEMATIKA DAN ILMU PENGETAHUAN ALAM
Alamat: Karangmalang, Yogyakarta - 55281
====================================================================
LESSON PLAN

1. Identity
Faculty
Study Program
Course/Code
Credits
Semester
Prerequesite /code
Lecturer

:
:
:
:
:
:
:

MIPA
Science Education
Analysis of Trends in Science Education
2/ PSC-221
2
Zuhdan K. Prasetyo

2. Basic competency:
Understand the analysis of trends of science education today.
3. Indicators:
Explain the analysis about a taxonomy for science education
4. Topic:
A taxonomy for science education
5. Syntaxes
Steps
(1)
Introduction

Core

Activities
(2)
- Delivering a brief description of the
study design
- Demonstrate the relevance of the
competence of the lecture
- Indicates basic competence to be
achieved
Explain and discuss a taxonomy for
science education

Methods or Media
(3)
Methods:
Lecturing
Media: Power point
containing introduction of
the lecture

Time
(4)
10 minutes

Metode:
- Lecturing
- Discussion

80 minutes

Media:
Power poin containing the
approaches of the science
teacher
professional
development

6

Closing

- Provide feedback
- Summarize
- Describe follow-up

Metode:
- Discussion
- Assignment
Media:
Power point containing
summary and follow-up
assignment

10 minutes

6. Assessment:
A list of question to conduct orally test
7. References :
A. Compulsory:
Check, Dennis W. (1992). Science Curriculum Resources Handbook: A Practical Guide
for K-12 Science Curriculum. New York: Kraus International Publications.

B. Additional:
Oliva, Peter F. 1992. Developing the Curriculum. New York: Harper Collin Publishers Inc.

Yogyakarta, February, 2015
Lecturer

Zuhdan K Prasetyo
NIP. 195504151985021001

7

Analisys of Trends in
Science Education
Feb-June Semester
2013/2014
Zuhdan K. Prasetyo
Science Education YSU

Preface


Analisys of trends in science education is inevitable
in our lives. Especially in this century that changes
occur so quickly, even so in science education in the
world as well as in Indonesia. Analisys of trends, for
example in the USA exemplified when Russia
successfully launched Sputnik in 1957, the science
education in the country is also changing. In
Indonesia, it is also the case, ie when the K-13 back
to the SBC. In this course will analyze two things in
the perspective of science education both in the
USA and Indonesia.

The Beginnings: 1860 – 1920
Little that would recognize as “science” took
place in schools in the early 1800s. Emphasis on
the three Rs and rote memorization was the
order of the day.
Of course, the era of Big Science was still in the
future. “Science” itself was well established, just
not well funded or collaborative in nature, so
little societal pressure was brought to bear on
including science as a school subject.

The Utilitarian/Textbook: 1920 - 1957
This was a period of prodigious economic and
political growth tempered by war, a major
depression, and rapid technological development.
First an 8-4 pattern of elementary-high school
organization was developed. This was followed by
a 6-3-3 pattern as the children of the middle
years were observed to be in an emotional and
physical growth period requiring a transitional
schooling phase which became known as the
junior high school.

The First Revolution: 1957 - 1978
It was unthinkable! Another country
launched an artificial satellite to orbit the
earth before the United States did. The
“best in the world” complacency of
American Science was rattled, and the
American public was aghast.

The Second Revolution: 1980 - Present
The First Revolution was a reaction
against ingrained classicism, rote
memorization of facts, didactic teaching,
and a largely outdated and irrelevant
science curriculum.

Science Education Today: A Taxonomy for
Science Education

The traditional view considered that science was
knowledge of the universe that had accumulated
throughout recorded history. Only recently (the last
thirty-five years) has there been much attention directed
to science processes, the skills that scientists use to
discover new knowledge. However, it is clear today that
there is much more to science education than content
and processes.

Science Education Today:
Cognitive Science and Constructivism
 Domain I - Knowing and Understanding (knowledge domain)
 Domain II – Exploring and Discovering (process of science domain)

 Domain III – Imagining and Creating (creativity domain)
 Domain IV _ Feeling and Valuing (attitudinak domain)

 Domain V – Using and Applying (applications and connections domain)

Science Education Today:
Cognitive Science and Constructivism
Since the 1930s, a behaviorist school of psychology has
dominated American education which has assumed that the

human mind is an unfathomable “black box.” According to this

point of view, learning could be studied only as a set of
reinforceable behaviors that were affected by stimulus and
reward. Teaching, therefore, was the process of building

hundreds of “associations” through practice and reinforcing

rewards.

Science Education Today: Cooperative Learning
One of the exciting trends in science education involves
a departure from the competitive, individualistic
classroom organizations characteristic of American

schools. Recent research suggests that immense benefits
can be gained when science is taught via a cooperative
learning method.

Science Education Today: Technology
Computers, television, videodiscs, and telecommunications
are making inroads into science education and continue to

promise a technological revolution for our schools. However,

due mainly to budgetary limitations, the “revolution” has been
far from generally realized.

Science Education Today: Gender and
Cultural Inequities in Science Education
Our world is becoming increasingly technologically oriented,
and it is imperative that all people understand the importance
of science in everyday living. As jobs become increasingly
intermeshed with technology, individuals without skills in
science and technology will be at a reserve disadvantage in
finding a livelihood. All citizens will need sufficient scientific

background

to

make

informed

decisions

on

science/technology/society-related issues such as pollution,
acid rain, tropical-rainforest deforestation, and AIDS.

Science Education Today:
Alternative Assessment
Assuredly, great foment characterizes current curricula and research in
science education. However, the professional literature clearly indicates
that assessment strategies have not kept pace with extant learning

theory, instructional strategies, educational technology, and curricular
advances. It is becoming increasingly obvious that scores on existing
standardized and teacher-made test reveal only a narrow and

incomplete glimpse of human achievement.

2013 Curriculum (K-13)


The 2013 curriculum completes the approximation method based on

the students’ creativity. The new curriculum fulfils three main components
of education: knowledge, skill, and attitude. Knowledge is proved by the
lesson in general. Skill is from their practical lesson like sports and attitude
is reflected by implementing the additional time for religion subject. In
view of character building and religion subjects are inserted into the 2013
curriculum more.



The 2013 curriculum is designed continuously from SD to SMA.
Specifically, the SMA competence is a continuance from SD and SMP.

KTSP Sebelum dan Setelah K-13
• Indonesia has changed its curriculum ten times from 1947 to KTSP

• The 2006 curriculum is also known as the “Kurikulum Tingkat Satuan Pendidikan

(KTSP) or School-Based Curriculum (SBC)”. The KTSP is designed in order that

every school can develop the teaching and learning process according to the student’s
character and the situation of school. As a result, the teacher can develop his methods

and techniques in the teaching and learning process and increase the students’
competencies too. The successful of the implementation of KTSP may rely on some
factors. These factors include a complete readiness of the teacher’s language

proficiency, the teacher’s language teaching, and the teacher’s ability to media or

tools in the teaching and learning process. If those factors are fulfilled, the main goal

of the implementation of KTSP which is to develop students’ competencies will be
achieved.