S KIM 1204824 Bibliography
93
DAFTAR PUSTAKA
Alwi, H. (2005). Kamus besar bahasa Indonesia. Jakarta : Balai Pustaka.
Arifin, Z. (2012). Evaluasi pembelajaran prinsip-teknik-prosedur. Bandung: PT.
Remaja Rosdakarya.
Atkins,dkk. (2010). Inorganic chemistry. New York: W.H. Freeman and
Company.
Awan, A. S., dkk. (tanpa tahun). Gender disparity in misconceptions about the
concept of solution at secondary level students in Pakistan. Journal of
Elementary Education, 22(1), hlm. 65-79.
Barret, J. (2001). Structure and bonding. UK : Rotal Society of Chemistry.
Bayrak, B.K. (2013). Using two-tier test to identify primery students’ conceptual
understanding and alternative conception in acid base. Mevlana International
Journal of Education, 3(2), hlm. 19-26.
Becker, B.J. (1989) Gender and science achievement: A reanalysis of studies from
two-metaanalysis. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 26(2), hlm. 141169.
Chandrasegaran, A.L., dkk. (2007). The development of a two-tier multiplechoice diagnostic instrument for evaluating secondary school students’ ability
to describe and explain chemical reactions using multiple levels of
representation. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 8(3), hlm. 293307.
Chen, C., dkk. (2002). Developing a two-tier diagnostic instrument to assess high
school students’ understanding- the formation of images by plane mirror.
Proc. Natl. Sci. Counc, 12(3), hlm. 106-121.
Dahar, R.W. (2011). Teori-teori belajar dan pembelajaran. Jakarta : PT. Gelora
Aksara Pratama.
Direktorat Pembinaan SMA Kemendikbud. (2014). Data pokok SMA berdasarkan
tahun
2015/2016
per
1
Juni
2016.
[Online].
Diakses
dari
http://psma.kemdikbud.go.id/home/statistik/dp_sma.php?id=2&kab=Kab.%2
0Jepara&prov=Prop.%20Jawa%20Tengah.
Djamarah, S.B. (1994). Prestasi belajar dan kompetensi guru. Surabaya: Usaha
Nasional.
Laela Nurjanah, 2016
PROFIL MISKONSEPSI SISWA SMA DI JEPARA PADA MATERI BILANGAN KUANTUM DAN
KONFIGURASI ELEKTRON MENGGUNAKAN TES DIAGNOSTIK TWO-TIER MULTIPLE CHOICES
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu | perpustakaan.upi.edu
94
Driver, R. & Erickson, G. (1983). Theories in action: some theoretical and
empirical issues in the study of students’ conceptual frameworks in science.
Studies in Science Education, 10, hlm. 37-60.
Ehrenberg, D.S. (1991). Concept learning: How to make it happen in the
classroom.
Florida:
Association
for
Supervision
and
Curriculum
Development.
Fadiawati, N. & Liliasari. (2009). Konsepsi mahasiswa pendidikan kimia tahun
pertama tentang struktur atom. Seminar Nasional Penelitian, Pendidikan dan
Penerapan MIPA FPMIPA UNY. Yogyakarta: UNY.
Gilreath, E.S. (1958). Inorganic chemistry. New York: McGraw-hill Book
Company, Inc.
Grifftilrs, A.K., dkk. (1988). Remidiation of student specific misconception
relation to three science concept. Journal od Research in Science Teaching,
25.
HAM, M. (2005). Kamus Kimia. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Horton, C. (2004). Student alternative conception in Chemistry. USA: Arizona
University.
Iowi, U.M. (1984). Misconception in physics among Nigerian secondary school.
Physics Education, 19, hlm. 279-285.
Larasari, D.N. (2015). Tes diagnostik two-tier untuk mengidentifikasi miskonsepsi
siswakelas X pada materi bilangan kuantum dan konfigurasi elektron.
(SKRIPSI). Program Studi Pendidikan Kimia FPMIPA Universitas
Pendidikan Indonesia, Bandung.
MacKinnon, G.R. (1999). Students’ understanding of orbtials: A survey. Canada:
The Education Resources Information Center (ERIC).
McClary, L.M. & Bretz, S.L. (2012). Development and assessment of a diagnostic
tool to idetify organic chemistry students’ alternative conceptions related to
acid strength. International Journal of Science Education, 34(15), hlm. 23172341.
McGee, M.F. 1979. Human Spatial Ability: Psychometric Studies and
Environment:
Genetic,
Hormonal,
and
Neurological
Influences.
Psychological Bulletin, 5, hlm: 887-902.
Laela Nurjanah, 2016
PROFIL MISKONSEPSI SISWA SMA DI JEPARA PADA MATERI BILANGAN KUANTUM DAN
KONFIGURASI ELEKTRON MENGGUNAKAN TES DIAGNOSTIK TWO-TIER MULTIPLE CHOICES
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu | perpustakaan.upi.edu
95
Muchtar, Z., & Harizal. (2012). Analyzing of students’ misconceptions on acidbase chemistry at senior high schools in Medan. Journal of Education and
Practice, 3(15), hlm. 65-74.
Mulyani, S. (1983). Psikologi pendidikan. Jakarta IKIP Jakarta Press.
Mutlu, A. & Sesen, B.A. (2014). Development of two-tier diagnostic test to assess
undergraduates’ understanding of some chemistry concepts. Procedia Social
and Behavioral Science, 174, hlm. 629-635.
Nakiboglu, C. (2003). Instructional misconceptions of Turkish prospective
chemistry teachers about atomic orbitals and hybridization. Chemistry
Education Research and Practice, 4(2), hlm. 171-188.
Nitko & Brookhart. (2011). Educational assessment of student. Boston : Pearson.
Odom, A.L. & Barrow, L.H. (1995). Development and application of two-tier
diagnostic test measuring College Biology students’ understanding of
diffusion and osmosis after a course of instruction. Journal of Reasearch in
Science Teaching, 32(1), hlm. 45-61.
Oktavia, A.D.L. (2014). Mengembangkan kecerdasan visual spasial anak usia
dini menggunakan media buku bantal di taman kanak-kanak Sandhy Putra
Telkom Kelompok B1 Kota Bengkulu. (SKRIPSI). Program Studi PGPAUD,
FKIP, Universitas Bengkulu, Bengkulu.
Orgil, M., & Sutherland, A. (2008). Undergraduate chemistry students’ perception
of and misconceptions about buffers and buffer problems, Chemistry
Education Research Practice, 9, hlm. 131-143.
Osborne, R.J. & Dillon, J.K. (2010). Good practice in science teaching: what
research has to say. Berkshire: McGraw Hill House.
Pujayanto, dkk. (2009). Profil miskonsepsi siswa SD pada konsep gaya dan
cahaya, Seminar Lokakarya Nasional Pendidikan Biologi FKIP UNS.
Surakarta: UNS.
Putri, K.P. & Rinaningsih, (2013). Pengembangan tes diagnostik materi teori
mekanika kuantum dan ikatan kimia. Unesa Journal of Chemical Education,
2(2), hlm. 159-172.
Laela Nurjanah, 2016
PROFIL MISKONSEPSI SISWA SMA DI JEPARA PADA MATERI BILANGAN KUANTUM DAN
KONFIGURASI ELEKTRON MENGGUNAKAN TES DIAGNOSTIK TWO-TIER MULTIPLE CHOICES
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu | perpustakaan.upi.edu
96
Rahman, F. (2014). Miskonsepsi bilangan kuantum dan konfigurasi elektron pada
peserta didik kelas XI IPA, studi kasus di SMA Kota Banjarmasin.
QUANTUM Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Sains, 5(2), hlm. 73-81.
Ramdiah, S. (2014). Hasil belajar kognitif biologi siswa putra dan putri kelas XII
IPA SMA di Kota Banjarmasin pada strategi pembelajaran PQ4R
diintegrasikan peta konsep, Seminar Nasional XI Pendidikan Biologi FKIP
UNS. Surakarta: UNS.
Sidauruk, S. (2005). Miskonsepsi stoikiometri pada siswa SMA. Jurnal Penelitian
dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 2(7), hlm. 253-272.
Silvianty, A. (2016). Miskonsepsi siswa SD tentang perubahan wujud benda:
digali menggunakan wawancara dalam bahasa ibu- bahasa melayu Sambas.
(SKRIPSI). Program Studi
Pendidikan Fisika FPMIPA Universitas
Tanjungpura, Pontianak.
Singh, C. (2001). Student understanding of quantum mechanics. American
Journal of Physics, 69 (8), hlm. 885-895.
Smith, J.P., diSessa, A.A., & Roschelle, J. (1993-1994). Misconception
reconceived: A constructivist analysis of knowledge in transtions. The
Journal of the Learning Science, 3(2), hlm. 115-163.
Sudarmo, U. 2013. Kimia untuk SMA/MA kelas X. Jakarta: Penerbit Erlangga.
Sudijono, A. (2011). Pengantar evaluasi pendidikan. Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo.
Sudjana. (2001). Metode statistika. Bandung: Tarsito.
Sudjana, N. (2009). Penilaian hasil proses belajar mengajar. Bandung: Remaja
Rosdakarya.
Sugiyono. (2015). Metode penelitian pendidikan. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Sugihartono, dkk. 2007. Psikologi Pendidikan. Yogyakarta: UNY Press.
Sukardi, M. (2010). Evaluasi pendidikan prinsip dan operasioonalnya. Jakarta:
Bumi Aksara.
Sukmadinata, N.S. (2013). Metode penelitian pendidikan. Bandung: Remaja
Rosdakarya.
Sunarya, Y. (2007). Kimia umum berdasarkan prinsip-prinsip kimia modern.
Bandung: Alkemi Grafisindo Press.
Laela Nurjanah, 2016
PROFIL MISKONSEPSI SISWA SMA DI JEPARA PADA MATERI BILANGAN KUANTUM DAN
KONFIGURASI ELEKTRON MENGGUNAKAN TES DIAGNOSTIK TWO-TIER MULTIPLE CHOICES
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu | perpustakaan.upi.edu
97
Suparno, P.(2005). Miskonsepsi dan Perubahan konsep pendidikan Fisika.
Jakarta: Grasindo.
Supasorn, S. & Promarak, V. (2014). Implementation of 5E inquiry incorporated
with analogy learning approach to enhance conceptual understanding of
chemical reaction rate for grade 11 students. Chemical Education Research
and Practice.
Susiani, D. (2009). Profil fisik atlet taekwondo Sleman pada Porprof DIY 2009.
(SKRIPSI). Fakultas Ilmu Keolahragaan, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta,
Yogyakarta.
Tan, K. D., dkk. (2005). The Ionization Energy Diagnostic Instrument: A TwoTier Multiple-Choice Instrument to Determine High School Students’
Understanding of Ionisation Energy. Chem. Educ. Res. Pract. 6 No. 4, 180197.
Treagust, D.F. (2007). Development and use of diagnostic test to evaluate
students’ misconcepstions in science. International Journal of Science
Education, 1(2), hlm. 159-169.
Tsai C.C. & Chou, C. (2002). Diagnosing students’ alternative conceptions in
science. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 18, hlm. 157-165.
Tsaparlis, G. & Papaphotis, G. (2009). High-school students’ conceptual
difficulties and attempts at conceptual change: the case of basic quantum
chemical concepts. International Journal of Science Education, 31(7), hlm.
895-930.
Tsaparlis, G. & Stefani, C. (2009). Students’ level of explanations, models, and
misconceptions in basic quantum chemistry: a phenomenographic study.
Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(2), hlm. 520-536.
Tuysuz, C. (2009). Development of two-tier diagnostic instrument and asssess
students’ understanding in chemistry. Science Research and Essay, 4(6), hlm.
626-631.
Utami. B. (2009). Kimia untuk SMA/MA kelas XI. Jakarta: Pusat Perbukuan,
Departemen Pendidikan Nasional.
Usman,
N.
(2002).
Konteks
implementasi
berbasis
kurikulum.
Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo Persada.
Laela Nurjanah, 2016
PROFIL MISKONSEPSI SISWA SMA DI JEPARA PADA MATERI BILANGAN KUANTUM DAN
KONFIGURASI ELEKTRON MENGGUNAKAN TES DIAGNOSTIK TWO-TIER MULTIPLE CHOICES
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu | perpustakaan.upi.edu
98
Whitten, dkk. (2004). General chemistry seven edition. USA : Thomson Brooks
Cole.
Wiersma, W. & Stephen, G. J. (2009). Research methods in education an
introductiion. USA: Pearson.
Yezierski, E.J., & Birk, J.P. (2006). Misconception about the particulate nature of
matter. Chemical Education Research, 83(6), hlm. 954-960.
Laela Nurjanah, 2016
PROFIL MISKONSEPSI SISWA SMA DI JEPARA PADA MATERI BILANGAN KUANTUM DAN
KONFIGURASI ELEKTRON MENGGUNAKAN TES DIAGNOSTIK TWO-TIER MULTIPLE CHOICES
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu | perpustakaan.upi.edu
DAFTAR PUSTAKA
Alwi, H. (2005). Kamus besar bahasa Indonesia. Jakarta : Balai Pustaka.
Arifin, Z. (2012). Evaluasi pembelajaran prinsip-teknik-prosedur. Bandung: PT.
Remaja Rosdakarya.
Atkins,dkk. (2010). Inorganic chemistry. New York: W.H. Freeman and
Company.
Awan, A. S., dkk. (tanpa tahun). Gender disparity in misconceptions about the
concept of solution at secondary level students in Pakistan. Journal of
Elementary Education, 22(1), hlm. 65-79.
Barret, J. (2001). Structure and bonding. UK : Rotal Society of Chemistry.
Bayrak, B.K. (2013). Using two-tier test to identify primery students’ conceptual
understanding and alternative conception in acid base. Mevlana International
Journal of Education, 3(2), hlm. 19-26.
Becker, B.J. (1989) Gender and science achievement: A reanalysis of studies from
two-metaanalysis. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 26(2), hlm. 141169.
Chandrasegaran, A.L., dkk. (2007). The development of a two-tier multiplechoice diagnostic instrument for evaluating secondary school students’ ability
to describe and explain chemical reactions using multiple levels of
representation. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 8(3), hlm. 293307.
Chen, C., dkk. (2002). Developing a two-tier diagnostic instrument to assess high
school students’ understanding- the formation of images by plane mirror.
Proc. Natl. Sci. Counc, 12(3), hlm. 106-121.
Dahar, R.W. (2011). Teori-teori belajar dan pembelajaran. Jakarta : PT. Gelora
Aksara Pratama.
Direktorat Pembinaan SMA Kemendikbud. (2014). Data pokok SMA berdasarkan
tahun
2015/2016
per
1
Juni
2016.
[Online].
Diakses
dari
http://psma.kemdikbud.go.id/home/statistik/dp_sma.php?id=2&kab=Kab.%2
0Jepara&prov=Prop.%20Jawa%20Tengah.
Djamarah, S.B. (1994). Prestasi belajar dan kompetensi guru. Surabaya: Usaha
Nasional.
Laela Nurjanah, 2016
PROFIL MISKONSEPSI SISWA SMA DI JEPARA PADA MATERI BILANGAN KUANTUM DAN
KONFIGURASI ELEKTRON MENGGUNAKAN TES DIAGNOSTIK TWO-TIER MULTIPLE CHOICES
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu | perpustakaan.upi.edu
94
Driver, R. & Erickson, G. (1983). Theories in action: some theoretical and
empirical issues in the study of students’ conceptual frameworks in science.
Studies in Science Education, 10, hlm. 37-60.
Ehrenberg, D.S. (1991). Concept learning: How to make it happen in the
classroom.
Florida:
Association
for
Supervision
and
Curriculum
Development.
Fadiawati, N. & Liliasari. (2009). Konsepsi mahasiswa pendidikan kimia tahun
pertama tentang struktur atom. Seminar Nasional Penelitian, Pendidikan dan
Penerapan MIPA FPMIPA UNY. Yogyakarta: UNY.
Gilreath, E.S. (1958). Inorganic chemistry. New York: McGraw-hill Book
Company, Inc.
Grifftilrs, A.K., dkk. (1988). Remidiation of student specific misconception
relation to three science concept. Journal od Research in Science Teaching,
25.
HAM, M. (2005). Kamus Kimia. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Horton, C. (2004). Student alternative conception in Chemistry. USA: Arizona
University.
Iowi, U.M. (1984). Misconception in physics among Nigerian secondary school.
Physics Education, 19, hlm. 279-285.
Larasari, D.N. (2015). Tes diagnostik two-tier untuk mengidentifikasi miskonsepsi
siswakelas X pada materi bilangan kuantum dan konfigurasi elektron.
(SKRIPSI). Program Studi Pendidikan Kimia FPMIPA Universitas
Pendidikan Indonesia, Bandung.
MacKinnon, G.R. (1999). Students’ understanding of orbtials: A survey. Canada:
The Education Resources Information Center (ERIC).
McClary, L.M. & Bretz, S.L. (2012). Development and assessment of a diagnostic
tool to idetify organic chemistry students’ alternative conceptions related to
acid strength. International Journal of Science Education, 34(15), hlm. 23172341.
McGee, M.F. 1979. Human Spatial Ability: Psychometric Studies and
Environment:
Genetic,
Hormonal,
and
Neurological
Influences.
Psychological Bulletin, 5, hlm: 887-902.
Laela Nurjanah, 2016
PROFIL MISKONSEPSI SISWA SMA DI JEPARA PADA MATERI BILANGAN KUANTUM DAN
KONFIGURASI ELEKTRON MENGGUNAKAN TES DIAGNOSTIK TWO-TIER MULTIPLE CHOICES
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu | perpustakaan.upi.edu
95
Muchtar, Z., & Harizal. (2012). Analyzing of students’ misconceptions on acidbase chemistry at senior high schools in Medan. Journal of Education and
Practice, 3(15), hlm. 65-74.
Mulyani, S. (1983). Psikologi pendidikan. Jakarta IKIP Jakarta Press.
Mutlu, A. & Sesen, B.A. (2014). Development of two-tier diagnostic test to assess
undergraduates’ understanding of some chemistry concepts. Procedia Social
and Behavioral Science, 174, hlm. 629-635.
Nakiboglu, C. (2003). Instructional misconceptions of Turkish prospective
chemistry teachers about atomic orbitals and hybridization. Chemistry
Education Research and Practice, 4(2), hlm. 171-188.
Nitko & Brookhart. (2011). Educational assessment of student. Boston : Pearson.
Odom, A.L. & Barrow, L.H. (1995). Development and application of two-tier
diagnostic test measuring College Biology students’ understanding of
diffusion and osmosis after a course of instruction. Journal of Reasearch in
Science Teaching, 32(1), hlm. 45-61.
Oktavia, A.D.L. (2014). Mengembangkan kecerdasan visual spasial anak usia
dini menggunakan media buku bantal di taman kanak-kanak Sandhy Putra
Telkom Kelompok B1 Kota Bengkulu. (SKRIPSI). Program Studi PGPAUD,
FKIP, Universitas Bengkulu, Bengkulu.
Orgil, M., & Sutherland, A. (2008). Undergraduate chemistry students’ perception
of and misconceptions about buffers and buffer problems, Chemistry
Education Research Practice, 9, hlm. 131-143.
Osborne, R.J. & Dillon, J.K. (2010). Good practice in science teaching: what
research has to say. Berkshire: McGraw Hill House.
Pujayanto, dkk. (2009). Profil miskonsepsi siswa SD pada konsep gaya dan
cahaya, Seminar Lokakarya Nasional Pendidikan Biologi FKIP UNS.
Surakarta: UNS.
Putri, K.P. & Rinaningsih, (2013). Pengembangan tes diagnostik materi teori
mekanika kuantum dan ikatan kimia. Unesa Journal of Chemical Education,
2(2), hlm. 159-172.
Laela Nurjanah, 2016
PROFIL MISKONSEPSI SISWA SMA DI JEPARA PADA MATERI BILANGAN KUANTUM DAN
KONFIGURASI ELEKTRON MENGGUNAKAN TES DIAGNOSTIK TWO-TIER MULTIPLE CHOICES
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu | perpustakaan.upi.edu
96
Rahman, F. (2014). Miskonsepsi bilangan kuantum dan konfigurasi elektron pada
peserta didik kelas XI IPA, studi kasus di SMA Kota Banjarmasin.
QUANTUM Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Sains, 5(2), hlm. 73-81.
Ramdiah, S. (2014). Hasil belajar kognitif biologi siswa putra dan putri kelas XII
IPA SMA di Kota Banjarmasin pada strategi pembelajaran PQ4R
diintegrasikan peta konsep, Seminar Nasional XI Pendidikan Biologi FKIP
UNS. Surakarta: UNS.
Sidauruk, S. (2005). Miskonsepsi stoikiometri pada siswa SMA. Jurnal Penelitian
dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 2(7), hlm. 253-272.
Silvianty, A. (2016). Miskonsepsi siswa SD tentang perubahan wujud benda:
digali menggunakan wawancara dalam bahasa ibu- bahasa melayu Sambas.
(SKRIPSI). Program Studi
Pendidikan Fisika FPMIPA Universitas
Tanjungpura, Pontianak.
Singh, C. (2001). Student understanding of quantum mechanics. American
Journal of Physics, 69 (8), hlm. 885-895.
Smith, J.P., diSessa, A.A., & Roschelle, J. (1993-1994). Misconception
reconceived: A constructivist analysis of knowledge in transtions. The
Journal of the Learning Science, 3(2), hlm. 115-163.
Sudarmo, U. 2013. Kimia untuk SMA/MA kelas X. Jakarta: Penerbit Erlangga.
Sudijono, A. (2011). Pengantar evaluasi pendidikan. Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo.
Sudjana. (2001). Metode statistika. Bandung: Tarsito.
Sudjana, N. (2009). Penilaian hasil proses belajar mengajar. Bandung: Remaja
Rosdakarya.
Sugiyono. (2015). Metode penelitian pendidikan. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Sugihartono, dkk. 2007. Psikologi Pendidikan. Yogyakarta: UNY Press.
Sukardi, M. (2010). Evaluasi pendidikan prinsip dan operasioonalnya. Jakarta:
Bumi Aksara.
Sukmadinata, N.S. (2013). Metode penelitian pendidikan. Bandung: Remaja
Rosdakarya.
Sunarya, Y. (2007). Kimia umum berdasarkan prinsip-prinsip kimia modern.
Bandung: Alkemi Grafisindo Press.
Laela Nurjanah, 2016
PROFIL MISKONSEPSI SISWA SMA DI JEPARA PADA MATERI BILANGAN KUANTUM DAN
KONFIGURASI ELEKTRON MENGGUNAKAN TES DIAGNOSTIK TWO-TIER MULTIPLE CHOICES
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu | perpustakaan.upi.edu
97
Suparno, P.(2005). Miskonsepsi dan Perubahan konsep pendidikan Fisika.
Jakarta: Grasindo.
Supasorn, S. & Promarak, V. (2014). Implementation of 5E inquiry incorporated
with analogy learning approach to enhance conceptual understanding of
chemical reaction rate for grade 11 students. Chemical Education Research
and Practice.
Susiani, D. (2009). Profil fisik atlet taekwondo Sleman pada Porprof DIY 2009.
(SKRIPSI). Fakultas Ilmu Keolahragaan, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta,
Yogyakarta.
Tan, K. D., dkk. (2005). The Ionization Energy Diagnostic Instrument: A TwoTier Multiple-Choice Instrument to Determine High School Students’
Understanding of Ionisation Energy. Chem. Educ. Res. Pract. 6 No. 4, 180197.
Treagust, D.F. (2007). Development and use of diagnostic test to evaluate
students’ misconcepstions in science. International Journal of Science
Education, 1(2), hlm. 159-169.
Tsai C.C. & Chou, C. (2002). Diagnosing students’ alternative conceptions in
science. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 18, hlm. 157-165.
Tsaparlis, G. & Papaphotis, G. (2009). High-school students’ conceptual
difficulties and attempts at conceptual change: the case of basic quantum
chemical concepts. International Journal of Science Education, 31(7), hlm.
895-930.
Tsaparlis, G. & Stefani, C. (2009). Students’ level of explanations, models, and
misconceptions in basic quantum chemistry: a phenomenographic study.
Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(2), hlm. 520-536.
Tuysuz, C. (2009). Development of two-tier diagnostic instrument and asssess
students’ understanding in chemistry. Science Research and Essay, 4(6), hlm.
626-631.
Utami. B. (2009). Kimia untuk SMA/MA kelas XI. Jakarta: Pusat Perbukuan,
Departemen Pendidikan Nasional.
Usman,
N.
(2002).
Konteks
implementasi
berbasis
kurikulum.
Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo Persada.
Laela Nurjanah, 2016
PROFIL MISKONSEPSI SISWA SMA DI JEPARA PADA MATERI BILANGAN KUANTUM DAN
KONFIGURASI ELEKTRON MENGGUNAKAN TES DIAGNOSTIK TWO-TIER MULTIPLE CHOICES
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu | perpustakaan.upi.edu
98
Whitten, dkk. (2004). General chemistry seven edition. USA : Thomson Brooks
Cole.
Wiersma, W. & Stephen, G. J. (2009). Research methods in education an
introductiion. USA: Pearson.
Yezierski, E.J., & Birk, J.P. (2006). Misconception about the particulate nature of
matter. Chemical Education Research, 83(6), hlm. 954-960.
Laela Nurjanah, 2016
PROFIL MISKONSEPSI SISWA SMA DI JEPARA PADA MATERI BILANGAN KUANTUM DAN
KONFIGURASI ELEKTRON MENGGUNAKAN TES DIAGNOSTIK TWO-TIER MULTIPLE CHOICES
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu | perpustakaan.upi.edu