RizkyMayoHutama 22010110130195 Bab8KTI
DAFTAR PUSTAKA
1. Morgan GE.Clinical Anesthesiology, 4th ed. New York: Mc Graw-Hill
Companies, Inc; 2006. pp. 91-116
2. Aitkenhead AR, Smith G.Textbook Of Anaesthesia. 2nd ed. Edinburgh:
Churchill Livingstone;1990. p.365
3. Ayu R. Perbedaan Pengaruh Premedikasi Berbagai dosis Klonidin
Terhadap Respon Kardiovaskuler pada Laringoskopi dan Intubasi
Endotrakhea [tesis]. Semarang: Bagian Anestesi Fakultas Kedokteran
Universitas Diponegoro; 2013.
4. Hagberg, C, Georgi R, Krier C. Complications of managing the airway.
Best Practice & Research Clinical Anaesthesiology; 2005;19(4):641-59
5. Sener EB, Ustun E, Ustun B, Sarihasan B. Haemodynamic responses and
upper airway morbidity following tracheal intubation in patients with
hypertension: Conventional laryngoscopy versus an intubating laryngeal
mask airway. Clinics; 2012;67(1):49-54
6. Siddiqui, Khan FZH. Haemodynamic response to Tracheal Intubation via
intubating laryngeal mask airway versus Direct Laryngoscopic Tracheal
Intubation. J Pak Med Assoc;2007;57(1): 11-4.
7. Simpson GD, Ross MJ, Mckeown DW, Ray DC. Tracheal intubation in
the critically ill: a multi-centre national study of practice and
complications. Br J Anaesth; 2012;108(5): 792-9.
8. Montazari K, Naghibi K, Hashemi SJ. Comparison of hemodynamic
changes after insertion of laryngeal mask airway, face mask and
endotracheal intubation. Acta Medica Iranica; 2004;42(6): 437.
9. Flemming DC, Orkin Fk, Kirby RR. Hazards of tracheal intubation. In:
Nikolous G, Robert RK. Complication in anesthesiology. 2nd ed.
Philadelphia: Lippincottraven; 1996. p. 229
10. Shribman AJ, Achola KJ. Cardiovascular and catecholamine responses to
laryngoscopy with and without tracheal intubation. Br J Anaesth;
1997;59(3): 295-9
11. Ansari M, Javadi H, Pourbehi M, Moqharrabi M, Rayzan M, Semnani S,
Et al. The Association of rate pressure product (RPP) and myocardial
perfusion imaging (MPI) findings: a preliminary study. Perfusion;2012;
27(3):207-13
12. Hassan HG, el-Sharkawy TY, Renck H, Mansour G, Fouda A.
Hemodynamic and catecholamine responses to laryngoscopy with vs
without endotracheal intubation. Acta Anaesthesiol Scan.1991;35(5):442-7
13. Fujii Y, Tanaka H, Toyooka H. Circulatory responses to laryngeal mask
airway insertion or tracheal intubation in normotensive and hypertensive
patients. Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia;1995;42(1): 32-6
14. Stone DJ, Gal TJ. Airway management. In: Miller RD. Anesthesia 5thed.
Philadelphia: Churchill livingstone; 2000. pp.1414-48
15. Rosenbalt WH. Airway management.In: Barash PG, Cullen BF, Stoelting
RK.Clinical Anesthesia. 5th ed. Philadelphia: William & Wilkins; 2006.
pp. 1247-346
16. Lecanwasam H, Dunn PF. Airway evaluation and management. In: Huford
WE, Bailin MT, Davidson JK. Clinical anesthesia procedures of the
massachusets general hospital. 6th.ed. Philadelphia: William & Wilkins;
2002. pp. 568-621
17. Mallick A, Klein H, Mosse E. Prevention of cardiovascular response to
tracheal intubation. Br J Anesth; 1996: 296-7
18. Sukron. Perbandingan Efek Magnesium Sulfat 30 mg/kgBB Intravena
dengan Lidokain 1,5 mg/kgBB terhadap Respon Kardiovaskuler Akibat
Tindakan Laringoskopi dan Intubasi [tesis]. Semarang: Bagian Anestesi
Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Diponegoro; 2009
19. Singh M. Stress response and anesthesia altering the pre and postoperative management. Indian J Anesth; 2003; 47(6):427-34
20. Gulec H, Cakan T, Yaman T, Yaman H, Kilinc AS, Basar H. Comparison
of hemodynamic and metabolic stress responses caused by endotracheal
tube and Proseal laryngeal mask airway in laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
Journal of Research in Medical Sciences; 2012;17(2):148-53
21. Handerson J. Airway mangement in adult. In: Miller RD,editor.
Anesthesia 7th ed. Philadelphia: Churchil Livingstone;2010. pp. 1573-610
22. Mahjoubifar M, Boroojeny SB. Hemodynamic changes during orotracheal
intubation with glidescope and dyrect laryngoscope. Iranian Red Crecent
Medical Journal; 2010; 12(4): 406-8
23. Malde AD, Sarode V. Attenuation of the haemodynamic response to
endotracheal intubation : ventanyl versus lignocaine. The journal of
anaesthesiology; 2007;12(1): 5-9
24. Henderson J. Tracheal intubation of adult patient. In: Caldent F, Pearce A.
Core topics in airway management. New York: Cambridge university
press; 2005: 69-80
25. Fuji Y, Saitoh Y, Shinji. Combined diltiazem and lidocaine reduces
cardiovascular response to tracheal extubation and anesthesia emergence
in hyperternsive patients. Can J Anesth; 1999: 46:952-6
26. Muchtar A, Suyatna FD. Obat antiaritmia. Dalam: Ganiswarna S,
Setiabudy R, Suyatna FD, Purwantyastuti, Nafriadi, editor. Farmakologi
dan terapi. Edisi 4. Bagian Farmakologi Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas
Indonesia. Jakarta: Gaya Baru; 1995: 289-314
27. Peralta R, Poterack KA, Kelly RF. Toxicity lidocaine.Medscape.[internet]
2008.c2014 [updated 2014 Jan 8 ; cited 2014 Feb 2].available from:
http//www.emedicene.com/article/167309-overview
28. Stoelting RK. Cardiac antidysrhythhmic drugs. In: Stoelting RK.
Pharmacology and physiology in anesthetic practice. 4th ed. Philadelphia:
Lippincott William & Wilkins; 2006. pp. 370-86
29. Mikawa K, Nishina K, Maekawa N, Obara H. Comparison of nicardipine,
dilitiazem, and verapamyl for controlling the cardiovascular responses to
tracheal intubation. Br J anesth;1996;76(2):221-6
30. Stackhouse RA, Infosino A. Airway Management. In: Miller RD, Pardo
MC, editors. Basic of Anesthesia. 6th ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier
Saunders;2011. pp.219-25
31. Atmawan DB, Villyastuti YW, Harahap MS. Perbedaan Tekanan Darah,
Laju Jantung dan Rate Pressure Product (RPP) Pada Pemberian Lidokain
1,5 Mg/Kgbb Intravena Sebelum Intubasi [tesis].Semarang: Bagian
Anestesi Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Diponegoro; 2009
32. Jerry AD, Susan AD. Understanding Anesthesia Equipment 5th Edition.
Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Willkins; 2007. pp. 21-40
33. Wikipedia, Diver D. Laryngoscopes-Miller blades [internet]. Wikipedia
the free encyclopedia; c2014 [updated 2013 Jan 17 ; cited 2014 Feb 16].
Available
from
:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Laryngoscopes-
Miller_blades.JPG#filehistory
34. Wikipedia, Sasata. Macintosh Blades [internet]. Wikipedia the free
encyclopedia; c2014 [updated 2010 Aug 13 ; cited 2014 Feb 16].
Available
from :
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Macintosh_Blades.
jpgmiller
35. Oklahoma State University,KoJCH. Airway Management and Ventilation
[internet]. Oklahoma (USA): Oklahoma State University;c2014 [updated
2014 February 16; cited 2014 February 16]. Available from :
http://www.cvm.okstate.edu/courses/vmed5412/Lect22.asp
36. Mitchell V, Patel A. Tracheal tubes. In: Chalder I, Pearce A, editors. Core
topics in airway management. Cambridge. Cambridge University Press;
2005: 57-67
37. Sulistiyono D, Villyastuti YW, Susilowati D. Intubasi endotrakea. Dalam :
Sunarjo, Jatmiko HD, editor. Anestesiologi. Semarang. Ikatan Dokter
Spesialis Anestesiologi Indonesia; 2010: 197-202
38. Dept of Anaesthesia & Intensive Care, The Chinese University,Sally
F.Intubation [internet]. Hongkong: The Chinese University; c2014
[updated 2014 February 4; cited 2014 February 16]. Available from :
http://www.aic.cuhk.edu.hk/web8/Intubation.htm
39. Lestari AP. Perbedaan Pengaruh Pemberian Propofol Dan Tionpental
Terhadap Respon Hemodinamik Pada Induksi Anestesi Umum [tesis].
Semarang: Bagian Anestesi Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Diponegoro;
2010
40. Smith P, Smith FJ, Becker PJ. Hemodynamic response to laryngoscopy
with and without tracheal intubation. Southern African Journal of
Anesthesia and Analgesia; 2008; 14(3):23-6
51
Lampiran 1. Ethical clearance
52
Lampiran 2. Lembar penelitian
53
54
Lampiran 3. Data primer
55
Lampiran 4. Output SPSS
A. OUTPUT SPSS SAMPEL PENELITIAN
Umur
NPar Tests
Mann-Whitney Test
Ranks
Kelompok
> 20 detik
< 20 detik
Total
Umur
N
19
19
38
Mean Rank
20.58
18.42
Sum of Ranks
391. 00
350. 00
Test S tatisticsb
Umur
Man n-Whitn ey U
160 .000
Wilcoxon W
350 .000
Z
-.59 9
A symp. S ig. (2 -tailed)
.549
a
E xa ct Sig. [ 2*(1-tailed
.563
S ig.)]
a. Not corrected for ties.
b. Group ing V ariable : Kelo mpok
BB
T-Test
Group Statistics
BB
Kelomp ok
> 2 0 detik
< 2 0 detik
N
19
19
Me an
Std. Deviation
59. 79
11. 703
58. 11
8.7 04
Std. Error
Me an
2.6 85
1.9 97
56
Inde pende nt Sample s Test
BB
Equal vari ances Equal vari ances
assum ed
not assumed
.540
.467
.503
.503
36
33.2 49
.618
.618
Leven e's T est for
F
Equality o f Va riances Sig.
t-test for Equ ality of
Mea ns
t
df
Sig. (2-t ailed)
Mea n Differen ce
Std. Error Differe nce
95% Co nfiden ce Interval Lower
of th e Differen ce
Upper
1.68 4
1.68 4
3.34 6
3.34 6
-5.1 02
8.47 0
-5.1 21
8.49 0
TB
NPar Tests
Mann-Whitney Test
Ranks
TB
Kelompok
> 20 detik
< 20 detik
Total
N
19
19
38
Mean Rank
19.26
19.74
Test S tatisticsb
TB
Man n-Whitn ey U
176 .000
Wilcoxon W
366 .000
Z
-.13 3
A symp. S ig. (2 -tailed)
.894
a
E xa ct Sig. [ 2*(1-tailed
.908
S ig.)]
a. Not corrected for ties.
b. Group ing V ariable : Kelo mpok
Sum of Ranks
366.00
375.00
57
Crosstabs
ASA * Kelompok
Cross tab
ASA
I
II
T otal
Kelomp ok
> 2 0 detik < 2 0 detik
Count
10
11
Exp ected Count
10. 5
10. 5
% within Ke lompo k
52. 6%
57. 9%
% o f To tal
26. 3%
28. 9%
Count
9
8
Exp ected Count
8.5
8.5
% within Ke lompo k
47. 4%
42. 1%
% o f To tal
23. 7%
21. 1%
Count
19
19
Exp ected Count
19. 0
19. 0
% within Ke lompo k 100 .0%
100 .0%
% o f To tal
50. 0%
50. 0%
T otal
21
21. 0
55. 3%
55. 3%
17
17. 0
44. 7%
44. 7%
38
38. 0
100 .0%
100 .0%
Chi-Square Tests
Pearson Chi-Square
a
Continu ity Correction
Likeliho od Ratio
Fisher's Exact T est
Line ar-by-Li near
Asso ciation
N of Valid Cases
Value
.106 b
.000
.106
.104
df
1
1
1
1
Asymp. Sig.
(2-sided )
.744
1.00 0
.744
Exa ct Sig.
(2-sided )
Exa ct Sig.
(1-sided )
1.00 0
.500
.748
38
a. Comput ed onl y f or a 2x2 table
b. 0 cell s (.0% ) have e xpected cou nt less th an 5. T he m inimu m expecte d count is
50.
58
Jenis kelamin * Kelompok
Cross tab
K elompo k
> 20 detik < 20 detik
Jenis kel amin Laki-laki
Count
8
6
E xp ected Count
7.0
7.0
% within Kelo mpok
42.1 %
31.6 %
% o f Tot al
21.1 %
15.8 %
P erempu an Count
11
13
E xp ected Count
12.0
12.0
% within Kelo mpok
57.9 %
68.4 %
% o f Tot al
28.9 %
34.2 %
T otal
Count
19
19
E xp ected Count
19.0
19.0
% within Kelo mpok 100 .0%
100 .0%
% o f Tot al
50.0 %
50.0 %
T otal
14
14.0
36.8 %
36.8 %
24
24.0
63.2 %
63.2 %
38
38.0
100 .0%
100 .0%
Chi-Square Tests
Pearson Chi-Square
a
Continu ity Correction
Likeliho od Ratio
Fisher's Exact T est
Line ar-by-Li near
Asso ciation
N of Valid Cases
Value
.452 b
.113
.454
.440
df
1
1
1
1
Asymp. Sig.
(2-sided )
.501
.737
.501
Exa ct Sig.
(2-sided )
Exa ct Sig.
(1-sided )
.737
.369
.507
38
a. Comput ed onl y f or a 2x2 table
b. 0 cell s (.0% ) have e xpected cou nt less th an 5. T he m inimu m expecte d count is
00.
59
B. OUTPUT SPSS TDS
Lama Intubasi > 20 detik
T-Test
Paired Sam ples Statis tics
Pair
1
Pair
2
Pair
3
Pair
4
Mea n
115 .89
141 .89
115 .89
134 .89
115 .89
126 .68
115 .89
118 .26
T DS.pre
T DS.1
T DS.pre
T DS.2
T DS.pre
T DS.5
T DS.pre
T DS.10
N
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
Std. Deviation
11.8 46
26.7 27
11.8 46
23.9 12
11.8 46
18.5 47
11.8 46
12.7 10
Std. Error
Mea n
2.71 8
6.13 2
2.71 8
5.48 6
2.71 8
4.25 5
2.71 8
2.91 6
Paire d Sa mples Corre lations
N
Pair 1
Pair 2
Pair 3
Pair 4
T DS.pre
T DS.pre
T DS.pre
T DS.pre
&
&
&
&
T DS.1
T DS.2
T DS.5
T DS.10
19
19
19
19
Correlat ion
.39 8
.61 3
.55 8
.26 5
Sig.
.09 2
.00 5
.01 3
.27 3
Paire d Sa mples Te st
Paired Diffe rences Mea n
Std. Deviation
Std. Error M ean
95% Co nfiden ce Interval Lower
of th e Differen ce
Upper
t
df
Sig. (2-t ailed)
Pair 1
T DS.pre
- T DS.1
-26. 000
24.5 54
Pair 2
T DS.pre
- T DS.2
-19. 000
19.0 96
Pair 3
T DS.pre
- T DS.5
-10. 789
15.4 62
Pair 4
T DS.pre
- T DS.10
-2.3 68
14.9 04
5.63 3
4.38 1
3.54 7
3.41 9
-37. 835
-14. 165
-4.6 16
18
.000
-28. 204
-9.7 96
-4.3 37
18
.000
-18. 242
-3.3 37
-3.0 42
18
.007
-9.5 52
4.81 5
-.69 3
18
.497
60
Lama Intubasi < 20 detik
T-Test
Paired Samples Statistics
Pair
1
Pair
2
Pair
3
TDS.pre
TDS.1
TDS.pre
TDS.5
TDS.pre
TDS.10
Mean
113. 53
130. 26
113. 53
120. 11
113. 53
113. 26
N
19
19
19
19
19
19
Std. Dev iation
12.812
24.062
12.812
20.415
12.812
16.374
Std. Error
Mean
2.939
5.520
2.939
4.683
2.939
3.756
Paired Samples Correlati ons
N
Pair 1
Pair 2
Pair 3
TDS.pre & TDS.1
TDS.pre & TDS.5
TDS.pre & TDS.10
19
19
19
Correlation
.627
.439
.581
Sig.
.004
.060
.009
Paire d Sa mples Te st
Paired Differences Mea n
Std. Deviation
Std. Error Me an
95% Co nfidence Interval Lower
of th e Difference
Upper
t
df
Sig. (2-t ailed)
Pair 1
T DS.pre
- T DS.1
-16. 737
18.8 82
Pair 2
T DS.pre
- T DS.5
-6.5 79
18.7 45
Pair 3
T DS.pre
- T DS.10
.263
13.7 35
4.33 2
4.30 0
3.15 1
-25. 838
-7.6 36
-3.8 64
18
.001
-15. 614
2.45 6
-1.5 30
18
.143
-6.3 57
6.88 3
.084
18
.934
61
NPar Tests
Wilcoxon Signed Ranks Test
Ranks
N
T DS.2 - T DS.pre Negative Ranks
Positive Ran ks
T ies
T otal
4a
15 b
0c
19
Mea n Rank Sum of Ranks
7.38
29.5 0
10.7 0
160 .50
a. T DS.2 < T DS.pre
b. T DS.2 > T DS.pre
c. T DS.2 = T DS.pre
Test S tatisticsb
T DS .2 T DS .pre
Z
-2.6 37 a
A symp. S ig. (2 -tailed )
.008
a. B ased on neg ative ranks.
b. Wilcoxon Sign ed Ranks T est
T-Test
Group Statisti cs
T DS.pre
Kelomp ok
> 20 detik
< 20 detik
N
19
19
Mea n
Std. Deviation
115 .89
11.8 46
113 .53
12.8 12
Std. Error
Mea n
2.71 8
2.93 9
62
Independent Sample s Test
T DS.pre
Equal variances Equal variances
assum ed
not assumed
.08 3
.77 5
.59 2
.59 2
36
35. 781
.55 8
.55 8
Leven e's T est for
F
Equality o f Va riances Sig.
t-te st for Equ ality of
Me ans
t
df
Sig. (2-t ailed)
Me an Differen ce
Std. Error Differe nce
95% Co nfiden ce Interval Lower
of t he Differen ce
Upper
2.3 68
2.3 68
4.0 03
4.0 03
-5.7 50
10. 487
-5.7 52
10. 489
T-Test
Group Statisti cs
T DS.1
Kelomp ok
> 2 0 detik
< 2 0 detik
N
19
19
Me an
Std. Deviation
141 .89
26. 727
130 .26
24. 062
Std. Error
Me an
6.1 32
5.5 20
Inde pende nt Sample s Test
Leven e's T est for
F
Equality o f Va riances Sig.
t-test for Equ ality of
Mea ns
t
df
Sig. (2-t ailed)
Mea n Differen ce
Std. Error Differe nce
95% Co nfiden ce Interval Lower
of th e Differen ce
Upper
T DS.1
Equal vari ances Equal vari ances
assum ed
not assumed
.594
.446
1.41 0
1.41 0
36
35.6 10
.167
.167
11.6 32
11.6 32
8.25 0
8.25 0
-5.1 01
28.3 64
-5.1 07
28.3 70
63
NPar Tests
Mann-Whitney Test
Ranks
TDS.2
Kelompok
> 20 detik
< 20 detik
Total
N
19
19
38
Mean Rank
21.95
17.05
Sum of Ranks
417. 00
324. 00
Test S tatisticsb
T DS .2
Man n-Whitn ey U
134 .000
Wilcoxon W
324 .000
Z
-1.3 59
A symp. S ig. (2 -tailed)
.174
a
E xa ct Sig. [ 2*(1-tailed
.181
S ig.)]
a. Not corrected for ties.
b. Group ing V ariable : Kelo mpok
T-Test
Group Statisti cs
T DS.5
Kelomp ok
> 2 0 detik
< 2 0 detik
N
19
19
Me an
Std. Deviation
126 .68
18. 547
120 .11
20. 415
Std. Error
Me an
4.2 55
4.6 83
64
Inde pende nt Sample s Test
T DS.5
Equal vari ances Equal vari ances
assum ed
not assumed
.000
.989
1.04 0
1.04 0
36
35.6 74
.305
.305
Leven e's T est for
F
Equality o f Va riances Sig.
t-test for Equ ality of
Mea ns
t
df
Sig. (2-t ailed)
Mea n Differen ce
Std. Error Differe nce
95% Co nfiden ce Interval Lower
of th e Differen ce
Upper
6.57 9
6.57 9
6.32 8
6.32 8
-6.2 54
19.4 12
-6.2 58
19.4 16
T-Test
Group Statisti cs
T DS.10
Kelomp ok
> 20 detik
< 20 detik
N
19
19
Mea n
Std. Deviation
118 .26
12.7 10
113 .26
16.3 74
Std. Error
Mea n
2.91 6
3.75 6
Inde pende nt Sample s Test
Leven e's T est for
F
Equality o f Va riances Sig.
t-test for Equ ality of
Mea ns
t
df
Sig. (2-t ailed)
Mea n Differen ce
Std. Error Differe nce
95% Co nfiden ce Interval Lower
of th e Differen ce
Upper
T DS.10
Equal vari ances Equal vari ances
assum ed
not assumed
.266
.609
1.05 1
1.05 1
36
33.9 14
.300
.300
5.00 0
5.00 0
4.75 5
4.75 5
-4.6 44
14.6 44
-4.6 65
14.6 65
65
C. OUTPUT SPSS LAJU JANTUNG
Lama Intubasi > 20 detik
T-Test
Paired Samples Statistics
Pair
1
Pair
2
Pair
3
HR.pre
HR.1
HR.pre
HR.2
HR.pre
HR.5
Mean
79.05
86.21
79.05
85.42
79.05
82.11
N
19
19
19
19
19
19
Std. Dev iat ion
8.270
12.925
8.270
14.611
8.270
13.042
Std. Error
Mean
1.897
2.965
1.897
3.352
1.897
2.992
Paired Samples Correlations
N
Pair 1
Pair 2
Pair 3
HR.pre & HR. 1
HR.pre & HR. 2
HR.pre & HR. 5
19
19
19
Correlation
.904
.890
.644
Sig.
.000
.000
.003
P aire d Sa mples Te st
P aired Diffe rences Mea n
S td. Deviation
S td. E rror M ean
95% Co nfiden ce Interval Lower
of th e Differen ce
Upper
t
df
S ig. (2-t ailed)
P air 1
HR.pre HR.1
-7.1 58
6.49 2
1.48 9
-10. 287
-4.0 29
-4.8 06
18
.000
P air 2
HR.pre HR.2
-6.3 68
8.16 6
1.87 4
-10. 304
-2.4 32
-3.3 99
18
.003
P air 3
HR.pre HR.5
-3.0 53
9.97 5
2.28 8
-7.8 60
1.75 5
-1.3 34
18
.199
66
NPar Tests
Wilcoxon Signed Ranks Test
Ranks
N
10 a
8b
1c
19
HR.10 - HR.pre Negative Ranks
Positi ve Ran ks
T ies
T otal
Mea n Rank Sum of Ran ks
8.80
88.0 0
10.3 8
83.0 0
a. HR.10 < HR.pre
b. HR.10 > HR.pre
c. HR.10 = HR.pre
Test S tatisticsb
HR.10 HR.pre
Z
-.10 9 a
A symp. S ig. (2 -tailed )
.913
a. B ased on positive ran ks.
b. Wilcoxon Sign ed Ranks T est
Lama Intubasi < 20 detik
T-Test
P aire d Sa mples Statistics
P air
1
P air
2
P air
3
P air
4
HR.pre
HR.1
HR.pre
HR.2
HR.pre
HR.5
HR.pre
HR.10
Mea n
77.1 1
85.3 2
77.1 1
83.8 9
77.1 1
80.3 2
77.1 1
76.3 7
N
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
S td. Deviation
9.61 4
14.6 37
9.61 4
15.7 65
9.61 4
14.5 30
9.61 4
12.4 02
S td. E rror
Mea n
2.20 6
3.35 8
2.20 6
3.61 7
2.20 6
3.33 3
2.20 6
2.84 5
67
Paire d Sa mple s Correlations
N
Pair 1
Pair 2
Pair 3
Pair 4
HR.pre
HR.pre
HR.pre
HR.pre
&
&
&
&
HR.1
HR.2
HR.5
HR.10
Correla tion
.69 3
.72 3
.60 4
.46 9
19
19
19
19
Sig.
.00 1
.00 0
.00 6
.04 3
P aire d Sa mples Te st
P aired Differences Mea n
S td. Deviation
S td. E rror Me an
95% Co nfiden ce Interval Lower
of th e Differen ce
Upper
t
df
S ig. (2-t ailed)
P air 1
HR.pre HR.1
-8.2 11
10.5 70
2.42 5
-13. 305
-3.1 16
-3.3 86
18
.003
P air 2
HR.pre HR.2
-6.7 89
11.0 43
2.53 3
-12. 112
-1.4 67
-2.6 80
18
.015
P air 3
HR.pre HR.5
-3.2 11
11.6 12
2.66 4
-8.8 07
2.38 6
-1.2 05
18
.244
P air 4
HR.pre HR.10
.737
11.5 89
2.65 9
-4.8 49
6.32 3
.277
18
.785
T-Test
Group Statistic s
HR.pre
Kelompo k
> 20 detik
< 20 detik
N
19
19
Mea n
Std. Deviation
79.0 5
8.27 0
77.1 1
9.61 4
Std. Error
Mea n
1.89 7
2.20 6
Inde pende nt Sample s Test
Leven e's T est for
F
Equality o f Va riances Sig.
t-test for Equ ality of
Mea ns
t
df
Sig. (2-t ailed)
Mea n Differen ce
Std. Error Differe nce
95% Co nfiden ce Interval Lower
of th e Differen ce
Upper
HR.pre
Equal vari ances Equal vari ances
assum ed
not assumed
.112
.740
.669
.669
36
35.2 13
.508
.508
1.94 7
1.94 7
2.90 9
2.90 9
-3.9 53
7.84 8
-3.9 58
7.85 2
68
T-Test
Group Statistics
HR.1
Kelomp ok
> 2 0 detik
< 2 0 detik
N
19
19
Me an
Std. Deviation
86. 21
12. 925
85. 32
14. 637
Std. Error
Me an
2.9 65
3.3 58
Inde pende nt Sample s Test
Leven e's T est for
F
Equality o f Va riances Sig.
t-test for Equ ality of
Mea ns
t
df
Sig. (2-t ailed)
Mea n Differen ce
HR.1
Equal vari ances Equal vari ances
assum ed
not assumed
.000
.995
.200
.200
36
35.4 57
.843
.843
Std. Error Differe nce
95% Co nfiden ce Interval Lower
of th e Differen ce
Upper
.895
.895
4.48 0
4.48 0
-8.1 91
9.98 0
-8.1 95
9.98 5
T-Test
Group Statistics
HR.2
Kelomp ok
> 2 0 detik
< 2 0 detik
N
19
19
Me an
Std. Deviation
85. 42
14. 611
83. 89
15. 765
Std. Error
Me an
3.3 52
3.6 17
69
Inde pende nt Sample s Test
Leven e's T est for
F
Equality o f Va riances Sig.
t-test for Equ ality of
Mea ns
t
df
Sig. (2-t ailed)
Mea n Differen ce
HR.2
Equal vari ances Equal vari ances
assum ed
not assumed
.057
.813
.310
.310
36
35.7 94
.759
.759
Std. Error Differe nce
95% Co nfiden ce Interval Lower
of th e Differen ce
Upper
1.52 6
1.52 6
4.93 1
4.93 1
-8.4 75
11.5 27
-8.4 77
11.5 29
T-Test
Group Statistics
HR.5
Kelomp ok
> 2 0 detik
< 2 0 detik
N
19
19
Me an
Std. Deviation
82. 11
13. 042
80. 32
14. 530
Std. Error
Me an
2.9 92
3.3 33
Inde pende nt Sample s Test
Leven e's T est for
F
Equality o f Va riances Sig.
t-test for Equ ality of
Mea ns
t
df
Sig. (2-t ailed)
Mea n Differen ce
Std. Error Differe nce
95% Co nfiden ce Interval Lower
of th e Differen ce
Upper
HR.5
Equal vari ances Equal vari ances
assum ed
not assumed
.265
.610
.399
.399
36
35.5 88
.692
.692
1.78 9
1.78 9
4.47 9
4.47 9
-7.2 95
10.8 74
-7.2 99
10.8 78
70
NPar Tests
Mann-Whitney Test
Ranks
HR.10
Kelompok
> 20 detik
< 20 detik
Total
N
19
19
38
Mean Rank
21.58
17.42
Sum of Ranks
410. 00
331. 00
Test S tatisticsb
HR.10
Man n-Whitn ey U
141 .000
Wilcoxon W
331 .000
Z
-1.1 55
A symp. S ig. (2 -tailed)
.248
a
E xa ct Sig. [ 2*(1-tailed
.258
S ig.)]
a. Not corrected for ties.
b. Group ing V ariable : Kelo mpok
D. OUTPUT SPSS RPP
T-Test
Paire d Sa mples Sta tistics
Pair
1
Pair
2
Pair
3
Pair
4
RPP.pre
RPP.1
RPP.pre
RPP.2
RPP.pre
RPP.5
RPP.pre
RPP.10
Mea n
917 1.42
123 23.05
917 1.42
116 89.16
917 1.42
104 82.11
917 1.42
930 1.00
N
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
Std. Deviation
138 9.882
327 7.733
138 9.882
348 2.057
138 9.882
260 8.639
138 9.882
192 4.590
Std. Error
Mea n
318 .861
751 .964
318 .861
798 .839
318 .861
598 .463
318 .861
441 .531
71
Paired Sa mples Correl ations
N
Pair 1
Pair 2
Pair 3
Pair 4
RPP.pre
RPP.pre
RPP.pre
RPP.pre
&
&
&
&
RPP.1
RPP.2
RPP.5
RPP.10
19
19
19
19
Correlat ion
.652
.788
.430
.400
Sig.
.002
.000
.066
.089
Paire d Sa mples Te st
Pair 1
Pair 2
Pair 3
Pair 4
RPP.pre RPP.pre RPP.pre RPP.pre
- RPP.1
- RPP.2
- RPP.5 - RPP.10
-315 1.63
-251 7.7 -131 0.68 -129 .579
259 5.209 253 5.830 237 0.206 186 9.244
Paired Differences Mea n
Std. Deviation
Std. Error Me an
95% Co nfidence Interval Lower
of th e Difference
Upper
t
df
Sig. (2-t ailed)
595 .382
581 .759
543 .762
428 .834
-440 2.48
-190 0.78
-5.2 93
18
.000
-374 0.0
-129 5.5
-4.3 28
18
.000
-245 3.09
-168 .282
-2.4 10
18
.027
-103 0.53
771 .368
-.30 2
18
.766
T-Test
Paire d Sa mples Sta tistics
Pair
1
Pair
2
Pair
3
Pair
4
RPP.pre
RPP.1
RPP.pre
RPP.2
RPP.pre
RPP.5
RPP.pre
RPP.10
Mea n
880 9.47
105 18.68
880 9.47
105 92.89
880 9.47
977 0.05
880 9.47
871 8.26
N
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
Std. Deviation
182 9.016
340 8.552
182 9.016
305 6.632
182 9.016
290 3.928
182 9.016
220 2.898
Std. Error
Mea n
419 .605
781 .975
419 .605
701 .239
419 .605
666 .207
419 .605
505 .379
72
Paired Sa mples Correl ations
N
Pair 1
Pair 2
Pair 3
Pair 4
RPP.pre
RPP.pre
RPP.pre
RPP.pre
&
&
&
&
RPP.1
RPP.2
RPP.5
RPP.10
19
19
19
19
Correlat ion
.362
.672
.641
.547
Sig.
.128
.002
.003
.015
P aired Sa mples Te st
P air 1
P air 2
P air 3
P air 4
RPP .pre RPP .pre RPP .pre RPP .pre
- RPP .1
- RPP .2
- RPP .5 - RPP .10
-170 9.21 -178 3.42 -960 .579
91.2 11
323 2.532 227 4.874 222 8.886 194 7.137
P aired Differences Mea n
S td. Deviation
S td. E rror Me an
741 .594
95% Con fidence Interval Lower
of th e Di fference
Upper
t
df
S ig. (2-ta iled)
521 .892
511 .342
446 .704
-326 7.24 -287 9.88 -203 4.87 -847 .279
-151 .180 -686 .967 113 .710 102 9.700
-2.3 05
-3.4 17
-1.8 79
.204
18
18
18
18
.033
.003
.077
.840
T-Test
Group Statistic s
RPP.pre
Kelomp ok
> 20 detik
< 20 detik
N
19
19
Mea n
Std. Deviation
917 1.42
138 9.882
880 9.47
182 9.016
Std. Error
Mea n
318 .861
419 .605
Independent Sample s Test
Leven e's T est for
F
Equality o f Va riances Sig.
t-te st for Equ ality of
Me ans
t
df
Sig. (2-t ailed)
Me an Differen ce
Std. Error Differe nce
95% Co nfiden ce Interval Lower
of t he Differen ce
Upper
RPP.pre
Equal variances Equal variances
assum ed
not assumed
.52 0
.47 5
.68 7
.68 7
36
33. 590
.49 7
.49 7
361 .947
361 .947
527 .011
527 .011
-70 6.880
143 0.775
-70 9.550
143 3.444
73
T-Test
Group Statisti cs
RPP.1
Kelomp ok
> 20 detik
< 20 detik
N
19
19
Mea n
Std. Deviation
123 23.05
327 7.733
105 18.68
340 8.552
Std. Error
Mea n
751 .964
781 .975
Inde pende nt Sample s Test
Leven e's T est for
F
Equality o f Va riances Sig.
t-test for Equ ality of
Mea ns
t
df
Sig. (2-t ailed)
Mea n Differen ce
RPP.1
Equal vari ances Equal vari ances
assum ed
not assumed
.099
.755
1.66 3
1.66 3
36
35.9 45
.105
.105
Std. Error Differe nce
95% Co nfiden ce Interval Lower
of th e Differen ce
Upper
180 4.368
180 4.368
108 4.866
108 4.866
-395 .842
400 4.579
-395 .959
400 4.696
T-Test
Group Statisti cs
RPP.2
Kelomp ok
> 20 detik
< 20 detik
N
19
19
Mea n
Std. Deviation
116 89.16
348 2.057
105 92.89
305 6.632
Std. Error
Mea n
798 .839
701 .239
74
Inde pende nt Sample s Test
Leven e's T est for
F
Equality o f Va riances Sig.
t-test for Equ ality of
Mea ns
t
df
Sig. (2-t ailed)
Mea n Differen ce
RPP.2
Equal vari ances Equal vari ances
assum ed
not assumed
.490
.489
1.03 1
1.03 1
36
35.4 06
.309
.309
Std. Error Differe nce
95% Co nfiden ce Interval Lower
of th e Differen ce
Upper
109 6.263
109 6.263
106 2.958
106 2.958
-105 9.516
325 2.042
-106 0.773
325 3.299
T-Test
Group Statisti cs
RPP.5
Kelomp ok
> 20 detik
< 20 detik
N
19
19
Mea n
Std. Deviation
104 82.11
260 8.639
977 0.05
290 3.928
Std. Error
Mea n
598 .463
666 .207
Inde pende nt Sample s Test
Leven e's T est for
F
Equality o f Va riances Sig.
t-test for Equ ality of
Mea ns
t
df
Sig. (2-t ailed)
Mea n Differen ce
Std. Error Differe nce
95% Co nfiden ce Interval Lower
of th e Differen ce
Upper
RPP.5
Equal vari ances Equal vari ances
assum ed
not assumed
.211
.649
.795
.795
36
35.5 94
.432
.432
712 .053
712 .053
895 .539
895 .539
-110 4.184
252 8.289
-110 4.904
252 9.009
75
T-Test
Group Statistic s
RPP.10
Kelomp ok
> 20 detik
< 20 detik
N
19
19
Mea n
Std. Deviation
930 1.00
192 4.590
871 8.26
220 2.898
Std. Error
Mea n
441 .531
505 .379
Inde pende nt Sample s Test
Leven e's T est for
F
Equality o f Va riances Sig.
t-test for Equ ality of
Mea ns
t
df
Sig. (2-t ailed)
Mea n Differen ce
Std. Error Differe nce
95% Co nfiden ce Interval Lower
of th e Differen ce
Upper
RPP.10
Equal vari ances Equal vari ances
assum ed
not assumed
.236
.630
.868
.868
36
35.3 63
.391
.391
582 .737
582 .737
671 .087
671 .087
-778 .291
194 3.765
-779 .143
194 4.617
76
Lampiran 5. Biodata
Nama
: Rizky Mayo Hutama
NIM
: 22010110130195
Tempat/tanggal lahir : Semarang, 8 Agustus 1992
Jeniskelamin
: Laki - laki
Alamat
: JL. Mangunharjo Raya no.1 Semarang
No Telp
: -
No HP
: 08112991112
Email
: [email protected]
Riwayat Pendidikan
1.SD
: SD H ISRIATI SEMARANG
Lulus tahun: 2004
2.SMP
: SMPN3 SEMARANG
Lulus tahun: 2007
3.SMA
: SMAN 1 SEMARANG
Lulus tahun: 2010
4.FK UNDIP
: 2010
1. Morgan GE.Clinical Anesthesiology, 4th ed. New York: Mc Graw-Hill
Companies, Inc; 2006. pp. 91-116
2. Aitkenhead AR, Smith G.Textbook Of Anaesthesia. 2nd ed. Edinburgh:
Churchill Livingstone;1990. p.365
3. Ayu R. Perbedaan Pengaruh Premedikasi Berbagai dosis Klonidin
Terhadap Respon Kardiovaskuler pada Laringoskopi dan Intubasi
Endotrakhea [tesis]. Semarang: Bagian Anestesi Fakultas Kedokteran
Universitas Diponegoro; 2013.
4. Hagberg, C, Georgi R, Krier C. Complications of managing the airway.
Best Practice & Research Clinical Anaesthesiology; 2005;19(4):641-59
5. Sener EB, Ustun E, Ustun B, Sarihasan B. Haemodynamic responses and
upper airway morbidity following tracheal intubation in patients with
hypertension: Conventional laryngoscopy versus an intubating laryngeal
mask airway. Clinics; 2012;67(1):49-54
6. Siddiqui, Khan FZH. Haemodynamic response to Tracheal Intubation via
intubating laryngeal mask airway versus Direct Laryngoscopic Tracheal
Intubation. J Pak Med Assoc;2007;57(1): 11-4.
7. Simpson GD, Ross MJ, Mckeown DW, Ray DC. Tracheal intubation in
the critically ill: a multi-centre national study of practice and
complications. Br J Anaesth; 2012;108(5): 792-9.
8. Montazari K, Naghibi K, Hashemi SJ. Comparison of hemodynamic
changes after insertion of laryngeal mask airway, face mask and
endotracheal intubation. Acta Medica Iranica; 2004;42(6): 437.
9. Flemming DC, Orkin Fk, Kirby RR. Hazards of tracheal intubation. In:
Nikolous G, Robert RK. Complication in anesthesiology. 2nd ed.
Philadelphia: Lippincottraven; 1996. p. 229
10. Shribman AJ, Achola KJ. Cardiovascular and catecholamine responses to
laryngoscopy with and without tracheal intubation. Br J Anaesth;
1997;59(3): 295-9
11. Ansari M, Javadi H, Pourbehi M, Moqharrabi M, Rayzan M, Semnani S,
Et al. The Association of rate pressure product (RPP) and myocardial
perfusion imaging (MPI) findings: a preliminary study. Perfusion;2012;
27(3):207-13
12. Hassan HG, el-Sharkawy TY, Renck H, Mansour G, Fouda A.
Hemodynamic and catecholamine responses to laryngoscopy with vs
without endotracheal intubation. Acta Anaesthesiol Scan.1991;35(5):442-7
13. Fujii Y, Tanaka H, Toyooka H. Circulatory responses to laryngeal mask
airway insertion or tracheal intubation in normotensive and hypertensive
patients. Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia;1995;42(1): 32-6
14. Stone DJ, Gal TJ. Airway management. In: Miller RD. Anesthesia 5thed.
Philadelphia: Churchill livingstone; 2000. pp.1414-48
15. Rosenbalt WH. Airway management.In: Barash PG, Cullen BF, Stoelting
RK.Clinical Anesthesia. 5th ed. Philadelphia: William & Wilkins; 2006.
pp. 1247-346
16. Lecanwasam H, Dunn PF. Airway evaluation and management. In: Huford
WE, Bailin MT, Davidson JK. Clinical anesthesia procedures of the
massachusets general hospital. 6th.ed. Philadelphia: William & Wilkins;
2002. pp. 568-621
17. Mallick A, Klein H, Mosse E. Prevention of cardiovascular response to
tracheal intubation. Br J Anesth; 1996: 296-7
18. Sukron. Perbandingan Efek Magnesium Sulfat 30 mg/kgBB Intravena
dengan Lidokain 1,5 mg/kgBB terhadap Respon Kardiovaskuler Akibat
Tindakan Laringoskopi dan Intubasi [tesis]. Semarang: Bagian Anestesi
Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Diponegoro; 2009
19. Singh M. Stress response and anesthesia altering the pre and postoperative management. Indian J Anesth; 2003; 47(6):427-34
20. Gulec H, Cakan T, Yaman T, Yaman H, Kilinc AS, Basar H. Comparison
of hemodynamic and metabolic stress responses caused by endotracheal
tube and Proseal laryngeal mask airway in laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
Journal of Research in Medical Sciences; 2012;17(2):148-53
21. Handerson J. Airway mangement in adult. In: Miller RD,editor.
Anesthesia 7th ed. Philadelphia: Churchil Livingstone;2010. pp. 1573-610
22. Mahjoubifar M, Boroojeny SB. Hemodynamic changes during orotracheal
intubation with glidescope and dyrect laryngoscope. Iranian Red Crecent
Medical Journal; 2010; 12(4): 406-8
23. Malde AD, Sarode V. Attenuation of the haemodynamic response to
endotracheal intubation : ventanyl versus lignocaine. The journal of
anaesthesiology; 2007;12(1): 5-9
24. Henderson J. Tracheal intubation of adult patient. In: Caldent F, Pearce A.
Core topics in airway management. New York: Cambridge university
press; 2005: 69-80
25. Fuji Y, Saitoh Y, Shinji. Combined diltiazem and lidocaine reduces
cardiovascular response to tracheal extubation and anesthesia emergence
in hyperternsive patients. Can J Anesth; 1999: 46:952-6
26. Muchtar A, Suyatna FD. Obat antiaritmia. Dalam: Ganiswarna S,
Setiabudy R, Suyatna FD, Purwantyastuti, Nafriadi, editor. Farmakologi
dan terapi. Edisi 4. Bagian Farmakologi Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas
Indonesia. Jakarta: Gaya Baru; 1995: 289-314
27. Peralta R, Poterack KA, Kelly RF. Toxicity lidocaine.Medscape.[internet]
2008.c2014 [updated 2014 Jan 8 ; cited 2014 Feb 2].available from:
http//www.emedicene.com/article/167309-overview
28. Stoelting RK. Cardiac antidysrhythhmic drugs. In: Stoelting RK.
Pharmacology and physiology in anesthetic practice. 4th ed. Philadelphia:
Lippincott William & Wilkins; 2006. pp. 370-86
29. Mikawa K, Nishina K, Maekawa N, Obara H. Comparison of nicardipine,
dilitiazem, and verapamyl for controlling the cardiovascular responses to
tracheal intubation. Br J anesth;1996;76(2):221-6
30. Stackhouse RA, Infosino A. Airway Management. In: Miller RD, Pardo
MC, editors. Basic of Anesthesia. 6th ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier
Saunders;2011. pp.219-25
31. Atmawan DB, Villyastuti YW, Harahap MS. Perbedaan Tekanan Darah,
Laju Jantung dan Rate Pressure Product (RPP) Pada Pemberian Lidokain
1,5 Mg/Kgbb Intravena Sebelum Intubasi [tesis].Semarang: Bagian
Anestesi Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Diponegoro; 2009
32. Jerry AD, Susan AD. Understanding Anesthesia Equipment 5th Edition.
Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Willkins; 2007. pp. 21-40
33. Wikipedia, Diver D. Laryngoscopes-Miller blades [internet]. Wikipedia
the free encyclopedia; c2014 [updated 2013 Jan 17 ; cited 2014 Feb 16].
Available
from
:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Laryngoscopes-
Miller_blades.JPG#filehistory
34. Wikipedia, Sasata. Macintosh Blades [internet]. Wikipedia the free
encyclopedia; c2014 [updated 2010 Aug 13 ; cited 2014 Feb 16].
Available
from :
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Macintosh_Blades.
jpgmiller
35. Oklahoma State University,KoJCH. Airway Management and Ventilation
[internet]. Oklahoma (USA): Oklahoma State University;c2014 [updated
2014 February 16; cited 2014 February 16]. Available from :
http://www.cvm.okstate.edu/courses/vmed5412/Lect22.asp
36. Mitchell V, Patel A. Tracheal tubes. In: Chalder I, Pearce A, editors. Core
topics in airway management. Cambridge. Cambridge University Press;
2005: 57-67
37. Sulistiyono D, Villyastuti YW, Susilowati D. Intubasi endotrakea. Dalam :
Sunarjo, Jatmiko HD, editor. Anestesiologi. Semarang. Ikatan Dokter
Spesialis Anestesiologi Indonesia; 2010: 197-202
38. Dept of Anaesthesia & Intensive Care, The Chinese University,Sally
F.Intubation [internet]. Hongkong: The Chinese University; c2014
[updated 2014 February 4; cited 2014 February 16]. Available from :
http://www.aic.cuhk.edu.hk/web8/Intubation.htm
39. Lestari AP. Perbedaan Pengaruh Pemberian Propofol Dan Tionpental
Terhadap Respon Hemodinamik Pada Induksi Anestesi Umum [tesis].
Semarang: Bagian Anestesi Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Diponegoro;
2010
40. Smith P, Smith FJ, Becker PJ. Hemodynamic response to laryngoscopy
with and without tracheal intubation. Southern African Journal of
Anesthesia and Analgesia; 2008; 14(3):23-6
51
Lampiran 1. Ethical clearance
52
Lampiran 2. Lembar penelitian
53
54
Lampiran 3. Data primer
55
Lampiran 4. Output SPSS
A. OUTPUT SPSS SAMPEL PENELITIAN
Umur
NPar Tests
Mann-Whitney Test
Ranks
Kelompok
> 20 detik
< 20 detik
Total
Umur
N
19
19
38
Mean Rank
20.58
18.42
Sum of Ranks
391. 00
350. 00
Test S tatisticsb
Umur
Man n-Whitn ey U
160 .000
Wilcoxon W
350 .000
Z
-.59 9
A symp. S ig. (2 -tailed)
.549
a
E xa ct Sig. [ 2*(1-tailed
.563
S ig.)]
a. Not corrected for ties.
b. Group ing V ariable : Kelo mpok
BB
T-Test
Group Statistics
BB
Kelomp ok
> 2 0 detik
< 2 0 detik
N
19
19
Me an
Std. Deviation
59. 79
11. 703
58. 11
8.7 04
Std. Error
Me an
2.6 85
1.9 97
56
Inde pende nt Sample s Test
BB
Equal vari ances Equal vari ances
assum ed
not assumed
.540
.467
.503
.503
36
33.2 49
.618
.618
Leven e's T est for
F
Equality o f Va riances Sig.
t-test for Equ ality of
Mea ns
t
df
Sig. (2-t ailed)
Mea n Differen ce
Std. Error Differe nce
95% Co nfiden ce Interval Lower
of th e Differen ce
Upper
1.68 4
1.68 4
3.34 6
3.34 6
-5.1 02
8.47 0
-5.1 21
8.49 0
TB
NPar Tests
Mann-Whitney Test
Ranks
TB
Kelompok
> 20 detik
< 20 detik
Total
N
19
19
38
Mean Rank
19.26
19.74
Test S tatisticsb
TB
Man n-Whitn ey U
176 .000
Wilcoxon W
366 .000
Z
-.13 3
A symp. S ig. (2 -tailed)
.894
a
E xa ct Sig. [ 2*(1-tailed
.908
S ig.)]
a. Not corrected for ties.
b. Group ing V ariable : Kelo mpok
Sum of Ranks
366.00
375.00
57
Crosstabs
ASA * Kelompok
Cross tab
ASA
I
II
T otal
Kelomp ok
> 2 0 detik < 2 0 detik
Count
10
11
Exp ected Count
10. 5
10. 5
% within Ke lompo k
52. 6%
57. 9%
% o f To tal
26. 3%
28. 9%
Count
9
8
Exp ected Count
8.5
8.5
% within Ke lompo k
47. 4%
42. 1%
% o f To tal
23. 7%
21. 1%
Count
19
19
Exp ected Count
19. 0
19. 0
% within Ke lompo k 100 .0%
100 .0%
% o f To tal
50. 0%
50. 0%
T otal
21
21. 0
55. 3%
55. 3%
17
17. 0
44. 7%
44. 7%
38
38. 0
100 .0%
100 .0%
Chi-Square Tests
Pearson Chi-Square
a
Continu ity Correction
Likeliho od Ratio
Fisher's Exact T est
Line ar-by-Li near
Asso ciation
N of Valid Cases
Value
.106 b
.000
.106
.104
df
1
1
1
1
Asymp. Sig.
(2-sided )
.744
1.00 0
.744
Exa ct Sig.
(2-sided )
Exa ct Sig.
(1-sided )
1.00 0
.500
.748
38
a. Comput ed onl y f or a 2x2 table
b. 0 cell s (.0% ) have e xpected cou nt less th an 5. T he m inimu m expecte d count is
50.
58
Jenis kelamin * Kelompok
Cross tab
K elompo k
> 20 detik < 20 detik
Jenis kel amin Laki-laki
Count
8
6
E xp ected Count
7.0
7.0
% within Kelo mpok
42.1 %
31.6 %
% o f Tot al
21.1 %
15.8 %
P erempu an Count
11
13
E xp ected Count
12.0
12.0
% within Kelo mpok
57.9 %
68.4 %
% o f Tot al
28.9 %
34.2 %
T otal
Count
19
19
E xp ected Count
19.0
19.0
% within Kelo mpok 100 .0%
100 .0%
% o f Tot al
50.0 %
50.0 %
T otal
14
14.0
36.8 %
36.8 %
24
24.0
63.2 %
63.2 %
38
38.0
100 .0%
100 .0%
Chi-Square Tests
Pearson Chi-Square
a
Continu ity Correction
Likeliho od Ratio
Fisher's Exact T est
Line ar-by-Li near
Asso ciation
N of Valid Cases
Value
.452 b
.113
.454
.440
df
1
1
1
1
Asymp. Sig.
(2-sided )
.501
.737
.501
Exa ct Sig.
(2-sided )
Exa ct Sig.
(1-sided )
.737
.369
.507
38
a. Comput ed onl y f or a 2x2 table
b. 0 cell s (.0% ) have e xpected cou nt less th an 5. T he m inimu m expecte d count is
00.
59
B. OUTPUT SPSS TDS
Lama Intubasi > 20 detik
T-Test
Paired Sam ples Statis tics
Pair
1
Pair
2
Pair
3
Pair
4
Mea n
115 .89
141 .89
115 .89
134 .89
115 .89
126 .68
115 .89
118 .26
T DS.pre
T DS.1
T DS.pre
T DS.2
T DS.pre
T DS.5
T DS.pre
T DS.10
N
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
Std. Deviation
11.8 46
26.7 27
11.8 46
23.9 12
11.8 46
18.5 47
11.8 46
12.7 10
Std. Error
Mea n
2.71 8
6.13 2
2.71 8
5.48 6
2.71 8
4.25 5
2.71 8
2.91 6
Paire d Sa mples Corre lations
N
Pair 1
Pair 2
Pair 3
Pair 4
T DS.pre
T DS.pre
T DS.pre
T DS.pre
&
&
&
&
T DS.1
T DS.2
T DS.5
T DS.10
19
19
19
19
Correlat ion
.39 8
.61 3
.55 8
.26 5
Sig.
.09 2
.00 5
.01 3
.27 3
Paire d Sa mples Te st
Paired Diffe rences Mea n
Std. Deviation
Std. Error M ean
95% Co nfiden ce Interval Lower
of th e Differen ce
Upper
t
df
Sig. (2-t ailed)
Pair 1
T DS.pre
- T DS.1
-26. 000
24.5 54
Pair 2
T DS.pre
- T DS.2
-19. 000
19.0 96
Pair 3
T DS.pre
- T DS.5
-10. 789
15.4 62
Pair 4
T DS.pre
- T DS.10
-2.3 68
14.9 04
5.63 3
4.38 1
3.54 7
3.41 9
-37. 835
-14. 165
-4.6 16
18
.000
-28. 204
-9.7 96
-4.3 37
18
.000
-18. 242
-3.3 37
-3.0 42
18
.007
-9.5 52
4.81 5
-.69 3
18
.497
60
Lama Intubasi < 20 detik
T-Test
Paired Samples Statistics
Pair
1
Pair
2
Pair
3
TDS.pre
TDS.1
TDS.pre
TDS.5
TDS.pre
TDS.10
Mean
113. 53
130. 26
113. 53
120. 11
113. 53
113. 26
N
19
19
19
19
19
19
Std. Dev iation
12.812
24.062
12.812
20.415
12.812
16.374
Std. Error
Mean
2.939
5.520
2.939
4.683
2.939
3.756
Paired Samples Correlati ons
N
Pair 1
Pair 2
Pair 3
TDS.pre & TDS.1
TDS.pre & TDS.5
TDS.pre & TDS.10
19
19
19
Correlation
.627
.439
.581
Sig.
.004
.060
.009
Paire d Sa mples Te st
Paired Differences Mea n
Std. Deviation
Std. Error Me an
95% Co nfidence Interval Lower
of th e Difference
Upper
t
df
Sig. (2-t ailed)
Pair 1
T DS.pre
- T DS.1
-16. 737
18.8 82
Pair 2
T DS.pre
- T DS.5
-6.5 79
18.7 45
Pair 3
T DS.pre
- T DS.10
.263
13.7 35
4.33 2
4.30 0
3.15 1
-25. 838
-7.6 36
-3.8 64
18
.001
-15. 614
2.45 6
-1.5 30
18
.143
-6.3 57
6.88 3
.084
18
.934
61
NPar Tests
Wilcoxon Signed Ranks Test
Ranks
N
T DS.2 - T DS.pre Negative Ranks
Positive Ran ks
T ies
T otal
4a
15 b
0c
19
Mea n Rank Sum of Ranks
7.38
29.5 0
10.7 0
160 .50
a. T DS.2 < T DS.pre
b. T DS.2 > T DS.pre
c. T DS.2 = T DS.pre
Test S tatisticsb
T DS .2 T DS .pre
Z
-2.6 37 a
A symp. S ig. (2 -tailed )
.008
a. B ased on neg ative ranks.
b. Wilcoxon Sign ed Ranks T est
T-Test
Group Statisti cs
T DS.pre
Kelomp ok
> 20 detik
< 20 detik
N
19
19
Mea n
Std. Deviation
115 .89
11.8 46
113 .53
12.8 12
Std. Error
Mea n
2.71 8
2.93 9
62
Independent Sample s Test
T DS.pre
Equal variances Equal variances
assum ed
not assumed
.08 3
.77 5
.59 2
.59 2
36
35. 781
.55 8
.55 8
Leven e's T est for
F
Equality o f Va riances Sig.
t-te st for Equ ality of
Me ans
t
df
Sig. (2-t ailed)
Me an Differen ce
Std. Error Differe nce
95% Co nfiden ce Interval Lower
of t he Differen ce
Upper
2.3 68
2.3 68
4.0 03
4.0 03
-5.7 50
10. 487
-5.7 52
10. 489
T-Test
Group Statisti cs
T DS.1
Kelomp ok
> 2 0 detik
< 2 0 detik
N
19
19
Me an
Std. Deviation
141 .89
26. 727
130 .26
24. 062
Std. Error
Me an
6.1 32
5.5 20
Inde pende nt Sample s Test
Leven e's T est for
F
Equality o f Va riances Sig.
t-test for Equ ality of
Mea ns
t
df
Sig. (2-t ailed)
Mea n Differen ce
Std. Error Differe nce
95% Co nfiden ce Interval Lower
of th e Differen ce
Upper
T DS.1
Equal vari ances Equal vari ances
assum ed
not assumed
.594
.446
1.41 0
1.41 0
36
35.6 10
.167
.167
11.6 32
11.6 32
8.25 0
8.25 0
-5.1 01
28.3 64
-5.1 07
28.3 70
63
NPar Tests
Mann-Whitney Test
Ranks
TDS.2
Kelompok
> 20 detik
< 20 detik
Total
N
19
19
38
Mean Rank
21.95
17.05
Sum of Ranks
417. 00
324. 00
Test S tatisticsb
T DS .2
Man n-Whitn ey U
134 .000
Wilcoxon W
324 .000
Z
-1.3 59
A symp. S ig. (2 -tailed)
.174
a
E xa ct Sig. [ 2*(1-tailed
.181
S ig.)]
a. Not corrected for ties.
b. Group ing V ariable : Kelo mpok
T-Test
Group Statisti cs
T DS.5
Kelomp ok
> 2 0 detik
< 2 0 detik
N
19
19
Me an
Std. Deviation
126 .68
18. 547
120 .11
20. 415
Std. Error
Me an
4.2 55
4.6 83
64
Inde pende nt Sample s Test
T DS.5
Equal vari ances Equal vari ances
assum ed
not assumed
.000
.989
1.04 0
1.04 0
36
35.6 74
.305
.305
Leven e's T est for
F
Equality o f Va riances Sig.
t-test for Equ ality of
Mea ns
t
df
Sig. (2-t ailed)
Mea n Differen ce
Std. Error Differe nce
95% Co nfiden ce Interval Lower
of th e Differen ce
Upper
6.57 9
6.57 9
6.32 8
6.32 8
-6.2 54
19.4 12
-6.2 58
19.4 16
T-Test
Group Statisti cs
T DS.10
Kelomp ok
> 20 detik
< 20 detik
N
19
19
Mea n
Std. Deviation
118 .26
12.7 10
113 .26
16.3 74
Std. Error
Mea n
2.91 6
3.75 6
Inde pende nt Sample s Test
Leven e's T est for
F
Equality o f Va riances Sig.
t-test for Equ ality of
Mea ns
t
df
Sig. (2-t ailed)
Mea n Differen ce
Std. Error Differe nce
95% Co nfiden ce Interval Lower
of th e Differen ce
Upper
T DS.10
Equal vari ances Equal vari ances
assum ed
not assumed
.266
.609
1.05 1
1.05 1
36
33.9 14
.300
.300
5.00 0
5.00 0
4.75 5
4.75 5
-4.6 44
14.6 44
-4.6 65
14.6 65
65
C. OUTPUT SPSS LAJU JANTUNG
Lama Intubasi > 20 detik
T-Test
Paired Samples Statistics
Pair
1
Pair
2
Pair
3
HR.pre
HR.1
HR.pre
HR.2
HR.pre
HR.5
Mean
79.05
86.21
79.05
85.42
79.05
82.11
N
19
19
19
19
19
19
Std. Dev iat ion
8.270
12.925
8.270
14.611
8.270
13.042
Std. Error
Mean
1.897
2.965
1.897
3.352
1.897
2.992
Paired Samples Correlations
N
Pair 1
Pair 2
Pair 3
HR.pre & HR. 1
HR.pre & HR. 2
HR.pre & HR. 5
19
19
19
Correlation
.904
.890
.644
Sig.
.000
.000
.003
P aire d Sa mples Te st
P aired Diffe rences Mea n
S td. Deviation
S td. E rror M ean
95% Co nfiden ce Interval Lower
of th e Differen ce
Upper
t
df
S ig. (2-t ailed)
P air 1
HR.pre HR.1
-7.1 58
6.49 2
1.48 9
-10. 287
-4.0 29
-4.8 06
18
.000
P air 2
HR.pre HR.2
-6.3 68
8.16 6
1.87 4
-10. 304
-2.4 32
-3.3 99
18
.003
P air 3
HR.pre HR.5
-3.0 53
9.97 5
2.28 8
-7.8 60
1.75 5
-1.3 34
18
.199
66
NPar Tests
Wilcoxon Signed Ranks Test
Ranks
N
10 a
8b
1c
19
HR.10 - HR.pre Negative Ranks
Positi ve Ran ks
T ies
T otal
Mea n Rank Sum of Ran ks
8.80
88.0 0
10.3 8
83.0 0
a. HR.10 < HR.pre
b. HR.10 > HR.pre
c. HR.10 = HR.pre
Test S tatisticsb
HR.10 HR.pre
Z
-.10 9 a
A symp. S ig. (2 -tailed )
.913
a. B ased on positive ran ks.
b. Wilcoxon Sign ed Ranks T est
Lama Intubasi < 20 detik
T-Test
P aire d Sa mples Statistics
P air
1
P air
2
P air
3
P air
4
HR.pre
HR.1
HR.pre
HR.2
HR.pre
HR.5
HR.pre
HR.10
Mea n
77.1 1
85.3 2
77.1 1
83.8 9
77.1 1
80.3 2
77.1 1
76.3 7
N
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
S td. Deviation
9.61 4
14.6 37
9.61 4
15.7 65
9.61 4
14.5 30
9.61 4
12.4 02
S td. E rror
Mea n
2.20 6
3.35 8
2.20 6
3.61 7
2.20 6
3.33 3
2.20 6
2.84 5
67
Paire d Sa mple s Correlations
N
Pair 1
Pair 2
Pair 3
Pair 4
HR.pre
HR.pre
HR.pre
HR.pre
&
&
&
&
HR.1
HR.2
HR.5
HR.10
Correla tion
.69 3
.72 3
.60 4
.46 9
19
19
19
19
Sig.
.00 1
.00 0
.00 6
.04 3
P aire d Sa mples Te st
P aired Differences Mea n
S td. Deviation
S td. E rror Me an
95% Co nfiden ce Interval Lower
of th e Differen ce
Upper
t
df
S ig. (2-t ailed)
P air 1
HR.pre HR.1
-8.2 11
10.5 70
2.42 5
-13. 305
-3.1 16
-3.3 86
18
.003
P air 2
HR.pre HR.2
-6.7 89
11.0 43
2.53 3
-12. 112
-1.4 67
-2.6 80
18
.015
P air 3
HR.pre HR.5
-3.2 11
11.6 12
2.66 4
-8.8 07
2.38 6
-1.2 05
18
.244
P air 4
HR.pre HR.10
.737
11.5 89
2.65 9
-4.8 49
6.32 3
.277
18
.785
T-Test
Group Statistic s
HR.pre
Kelompo k
> 20 detik
< 20 detik
N
19
19
Mea n
Std. Deviation
79.0 5
8.27 0
77.1 1
9.61 4
Std. Error
Mea n
1.89 7
2.20 6
Inde pende nt Sample s Test
Leven e's T est for
F
Equality o f Va riances Sig.
t-test for Equ ality of
Mea ns
t
df
Sig. (2-t ailed)
Mea n Differen ce
Std. Error Differe nce
95% Co nfiden ce Interval Lower
of th e Differen ce
Upper
HR.pre
Equal vari ances Equal vari ances
assum ed
not assumed
.112
.740
.669
.669
36
35.2 13
.508
.508
1.94 7
1.94 7
2.90 9
2.90 9
-3.9 53
7.84 8
-3.9 58
7.85 2
68
T-Test
Group Statistics
HR.1
Kelomp ok
> 2 0 detik
< 2 0 detik
N
19
19
Me an
Std. Deviation
86. 21
12. 925
85. 32
14. 637
Std. Error
Me an
2.9 65
3.3 58
Inde pende nt Sample s Test
Leven e's T est for
F
Equality o f Va riances Sig.
t-test for Equ ality of
Mea ns
t
df
Sig. (2-t ailed)
Mea n Differen ce
HR.1
Equal vari ances Equal vari ances
assum ed
not assumed
.000
.995
.200
.200
36
35.4 57
.843
.843
Std. Error Differe nce
95% Co nfiden ce Interval Lower
of th e Differen ce
Upper
.895
.895
4.48 0
4.48 0
-8.1 91
9.98 0
-8.1 95
9.98 5
T-Test
Group Statistics
HR.2
Kelomp ok
> 2 0 detik
< 2 0 detik
N
19
19
Me an
Std. Deviation
85. 42
14. 611
83. 89
15. 765
Std. Error
Me an
3.3 52
3.6 17
69
Inde pende nt Sample s Test
Leven e's T est for
F
Equality o f Va riances Sig.
t-test for Equ ality of
Mea ns
t
df
Sig. (2-t ailed)
Mea n Differen ce
HR.2
Equal vari ances Equal vari ances
assum ed
not assumed
.057
.813
.310
.310
36
35.7 94
.759
.759
Std. Error Differe nce
95% Co nfiden ce Interval Lower
of th e Differen ce
Upper
1.52 6
1.52 6
4.93 1
4.93 1
-8.4 75
11.5 27
-8.4 77
11.5 29
T-Test
Group Statistics
HR.5
Kelomp ok
> 2 0 detik
< 2 0 detik
N
19
19
Me an
Std. Deviation
82. 11
13. 042
80. 32
14. 530
Std. Error
Me an
2.9 92
3.3 33
Inde pende nt Sample s Test
Leven e's T est for
F
Equality o f Va riances Sig.
t-test for Equ ality of
Mea ns
t
df
Sig. (2-t ailed)
Mea n Differen ce
Std. Error Differe nce
95% Co nfiden ce Interval Lower
of th e Differen ce
Upper
HR.5
Equal vari ances Equal vari ances
assum ed
not assumed
.265
.610
.399
.399
36
35.5 88
.692
.692
1.78 9
1.78 9
4.47 9
4.47 9
-7.2 95
10.8 74
-7.2 99
10.8 78
70
NPar Tests
Mann-Whitney Test
Ranks
HR.10
Kelompok
> 20 detik
< 20 detik
Total
N
19
19
38
Mean Rank
21.58
17.42
Sum of Ranks
410. 00
331. 00
Test S tatisticsb
HR.10
Man n-Whitn ey U
141 .000
Wilcoxon W
331 .000
Z
-1.1 55
A symp. S ig. (2 -tailed)
.248
a
E xa ct Sig. [ 2*(1-tailed
.258
S ig.)]
a. Not corrected for ties.
b. Group ing V ariable : Kelo mpok
D. OUTPUT SPSS RPP
T-Test
Paire d Sa mples Sta tistics
Pair
1
Pair
2
Pair
3
Pair
4
RPP.pre
RPP.1
RPP.pre
RPP.2
RPP.pre
RPP.5
RPP.pre
RPP.10
Mea n
917 1.42
123 23.05
917 1.42
116 89.16
917 1.42
104 82.11
917 1.42
930 1.00
N
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
Std. Deviation
138 9.882
327 7.733
138 9.882
348 2.057
138 9.882
260 8.639
138 9.882
192 4.590
Std. Error
Mea n
318 .861
751 .964
318 .861
798 .839
318 .861
598 .463
318 .861
441 .531
71
Paired Sa mples Correl ations
N
Pair 1
Pair 2
Pair 3
Pair 4
RPP.pre
RPP.pre
RPP.pre
RPP.pre
&
&
&
&
RPP.1
RPP.2
RPP.5
RPP.10
19
19
19
19
Correlat ion
.652
.788
.430
.400
Sig.
.002
.000
.066
.089
Paire d Sa mples Te st
Pair 1
Pair 2
Pair 3
Pair 4
RPP.pre RPP.pre RPP.pre RPP.pre
- RPP.1
- RPP.2
- RPP.5 - RPP.10
-315 1.63
-251 7.7 -131 0.68 -129 .579
259 5.209 253 5.830 237 0.206 186 9.244
Paired Differences Mea n
Std. Deviation
Std. Error Me an
95% Co nfidence Interval Lower
of th e Difference
Upper
t
df
Sig. (2-t ailed)
595 .382
581 .759
543 .762
428 .834
-440 2.48
-190 0.78
-5.2 93
18
.000
-374 0.0
-129 5.5
-4.3 28
18
.000
-245 3.09
-168 .282
-2.4 10
18
.027
-103 0.53
771 .368
-.30 2
18
.766
T-Test
Paire d Sa mples Sta tistics
Pair
1
Pair
2
Pair
3
Pair
4
RPP.pre
RPP.1
RPP.pre
RPP.2
RPP.pre
RPP.5
RPP.pre
RPP.10
Mea n
880 9.47
105 18.68
880 9.47
105 92.89
880 9.47
977 0.05
880 9.47
871 8.26
N
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
Std. Deviation
182 9.016
340 8.552
182 9.016
305 6.632
182 9.016
290 3.928
182 9.016
220 2.898
Std. Error
Mea n
419 .605
781 .975
419 .605
701 .239
419 .605
666 .207
419 .605
505 .379
72
Paired Sa mples Correl ations
N
Pair 1
Pair 2
Pair 3
Pair 4
RPP.pre
RPP.pre
RPP.pre
RPP.pre
&
&
&
&
RPP.1
RPP.2
RPP.5
RPP.10
19
19
19
19
Correlat ion
.362
.672
.641
.547
Sig.
.128
.002
.003
.015
P aired Sa mples Te st
P air 1
P air 2
P air 3
P air 4
RPP .pre RPP .pre RPP .pre RPP .pre
- RPP .1
- RPP .2
- RPP .5 - RPP .10
-170 9.21 -178 3.42 -960 .579
91.2 11
323 2.532 227 4.874 222 8.886 194 7.137
P aired Differences Mea n
S td. Deviation
S td. E rror Me an
741 .594
95% Con fidence Interval Lower
of th e Di fference
Upper
t
df
S ig. (2-ta iled)
521 .892
511 .342
446 .704
-326 7.24 -287 9.88 -203 4.87 -847 .279
-151 .180 -686 .967 113 .710 102 9.700
-2.3 05
-3.4 17
-1.8 79
.204
18
18
18
18
.033
.003
.077
.840
T-Test
Group Statistic s
RPP.pre
Kelomp ok
> 20 detik
< 20 detik
N
19
19
Mea n
Std. Deviation
917 1.42
138 9.882
880 9.47
182 9.016
Std. Error
Mea n
318 .861
419 .605
Independent Sample s Test
Leven e's T est for
F
Equality o f Va riances Sig.
t-te st for Equ ality of
Me ans
t
df
Sig. (2-t ailed)
Me an Differen ce
Std. Error Differe nce
95% Co nfiden ce Interval Lower
of t he Differen ce
Upper
RPP.pre
Equal variances Equal variances
assum ed
not assumed
.52 0
.47 5
.68 7
.68 7
36
33. 590
.49 7
.49 7
361 .947
361 .947
527 .011
527 .011
-70 6.880
143 0.775
-70 9.550
143 3.444
73
T-Test
Group Statisti cs
RPP.1
Kelomp ok
> 20 detik
< 20 detik
N
19
19
Mea n
Std. Deviation
123 23.05
327 7.733
105 18.68
340 8.552
Std. Error
Mea n
751 .964
781 .975
Inde pende nt Sample s Test
Leven e's T est for
F
Equality o f Va riances Sig.
t-test for Equ ality of
Mea ns
t
df
Sig. (2-t ailed)
Mea n Differen ce
RPP.1
Equal vari ances Equal vari ances
assum ed
not assumed
.099
.755
1.66 3
1.66 3
36
35.9 45
.105
.105
Std. Error Differe nce
95% Co nfiden ce Interval Lower
of th e Differen ce
Upper
180 4.368
180 4.368
108 4.866
108 4.866
-395 .842
400 4.579
-395 .959
400 4.696
T-Test
Group Statisti cs
RPP.2
Kelomp ok
> 20 detik
< 20 detik
N
19
19
Mea n
Std. Deviation
116 89.16
348 2.057
105 92.89
305 6.632
Std. Error
Mea n
798 .839
701 .239
74
Inde pende nt Sample s Test
Leven e's T est for
F
Equality o f Va riances Sig.
t-test for Equ ality of
Mea ns
t
df
Sig. (2-t ailed)
Mea n Differen ce
RPP.2
Equal vari ances Equal vari ances
assum ed
not assumed
.490
.489
1.03 1
1.03 1
36
35.4 06
.309
.309
Std. Error Differe nce
95% Co nfiden ce Interval Lower
of th e Differen ce
Upper
109 6.263
109 6.263
106 2.958
106 2.958
-105 9.516
325 2.042
-106 0.773
325 3.299
T-Test
Group Statisti cs
RPP.5
Kelomp ok
> 20 detik
< 20 detik
N
19
19
Mea n
Std. Deviation
104 82.11
260 8.639
977 0.05
290 3.928
Std. Error
Mea n
598 .463
666 .207
Inde pende nt Sample s Test
Leven e's T est for
F
Equality o f Va riances Sig.
t-test for Equ ality of
Mea ns
t
df
Sig. (2-t ailed)
Mea n Differen ce
Std. Error Differe nce
95% Co nfiden ce Interval Lower
of th e Differen ce
Upper
RPP.5
Equal vari ances Equal vari ances
assum ed
not assumed
.211
.649
.795
.795
36
35.5 94
.432
.432
712 .053
712 .053
895 .539
895 .539
-110 4.184
252 8.289
-110 4.904
252 9.009
75
T-Test
Group Statistic s
RPP.10
Kelomp ok
> 20 detik
< 20 detik
N
19
19
Mea n
Std. Deviation
930 1.00
192 4.590
871 8.26
220 2.898
Std. Error
Mea n
441 .531
505 .379
Inde pende nt Sample s Test
Leven e's T est for
F
Equality o f Va riances Sig.
t-test for Equ ality of
Mea ns
t
df
Sig. (2-t ailed)
Mea n Differen ce
Std. Error Differe nce
95% Co nfiden ce Interval Lower
of th e Differen ce
Upper
RPP.10
Equal vari ances Equal vari ances
assum ed
not assumed
.236
.630
.868
.868
36
35.3 63
.391
.391
582 .737
582 .737
671 .087
671 .087
-778 .291
194 3.765
-779 .143
194 4.617
76
Lampiran 5. Biodata
Nama
: Rizky Mayo Hutama
NIM
: 22010110130195
Tempat/tanggal lahir : Semarang, 8 Agustus 1992
Jeniskelamin
: Laki - laki
Alamat
: JL. Mangunharjo Raya no.1 Semarang
No Telp
: -
No HP
: 08112991112
: [email protected]
Riwayat Pendidikan
1.SD
: SD H ISRIATI SEMARANG
Lulus tahun: 2004
2.SMP
: SMPN3 SEMARANG
Lulus tahun: 2007
3.SMA
: SMAN 1 SEMARANG
Lulus tahun: 2010
4.FK UNDIP
: 2010