MEDIATING ROLE OF JOB SATISFACTION IN THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN SELF-EFFICACY AND TURNOVER INTENTION (Case Study: RS Yos Sudarso, Padang).
MEDL{IING ROLE
OF
SATISFACTTON TN
SELF-EFFICACY
'OB
TEE RELAAIONSIIIP BEIWEEN
AND TURXOWR INTENTTON
( C.$ Srldy: RS los Sndmo, Prdrtrg)
Prypd$oPddEgebdfu'\*lufug4
ruRNovrR rNrxNrroN (ca$
srudy:
s
yos
sud
o,
padmg)
Bigridi, reboi ed Doitrio (106)
ii
ddqnhdhy.oidiioNqd
atrt'qgn'llio!lhehilh.r'h,lun
q@PLqhhhgc6lldEoi@ia
enrroy*s {irh
! Nr
pqrolrurcc (HorrDe& od wilthhs. re36). 6!r de
s.
job edrrc'to^,
jorJ.jobd{erhh4bar6dbhndhnE ir.L@b0st6)dsdbd
iob *isndh 6 I PrwuEdc q Nli
a@ckd dorcs jqb q
jobqpdscr.
6d eldrelulresr), andr
0)
ds saFE @ub6udtu'job
w* fr&d rebs (tu qanPr. j
bdiidur adlD (fq *mpt. 4q du*tro4 *i,job kru&I ud
pq!4tr04 mioi
*$ic).
de *isffdodLr or 6cn cnproys! (B@,
edsffd €nFrq$ bo& b
bc
reeT).
oBniarb^ i no(
noE !n41iE (Ro6hs & rdgc, ,0?). &sid*,
CI{APTDR VI
CONCLUSIONI LIMITATIONAND SUCGf,STION
d€
PreFsd by 3rc0
wd, s
ud (otrr 0o&)
orc
d
joh e,ijirdotr
ir
6e
I
fusbdovsbpbo'dissfud}rqsDU*
.,bul6c$otD@njighl]r
GE
sE
n qLiL
cn!
06dE
high,
iob
& dr I $r rLnrc h
sisrdtoi
Ls
rcm
2
i
do
doi4 rhor iob tr
q ftn
job ed
,irl
$hiig
Ahm.
MM
erM'hnod,rF
{ffi!. Ao
(1@r).
rad djob $rifidb!
lnd
fu
@
(r@)
23,No]',06Pp'6@.d3
D A. aq6) rr n&dbcNdhd Rd{br
vvt
&try. L.M
0er) rt\rdas d
ot
PqrcuL|
nai.
^ c@t
o4orbdidi
&si9 h!jn
OF
SATISFACTTON TN
SELF-EFFICACY
'OB
TEE RELAAIONSIIIP BEIWEEN
AND TURXOWR INTENTTON
( C.$ Srldy: RS los Sndmo, Prdrtrg)
Prypd$oPddEgebdfu'\*lufug4
ruRNovrR rNrxNrroN (ca$
srudy:
s
yos
sud
o,
padmg)
Bigridi, reboi ed Doitrio (106)
ii
ddqnhdhy.oidiioNqd
atrt'qgn'llio!lhehilh.r'h,lun
q@PLqhhhgc6lldEoi@ia
enrroy*s {irh
! Nr
pqrolrurcc (HorrDe& od wilthhs. re36). 6!r de
s.
job edrrc'to^,
jorJ.jobd{erhh4bar6dbhndhnE ir.L@b0st6)dsdbd
iob *isndh 6 I PrwuEdc q Nli
a@ckd dorcs jqb q
jobqpdscr.
6d eldrelulresr), andr
0)
ds saFE @ub6udtu'job
w* fr&d rebs (tu qanPr. j
bdiidur adlD (fq *mpt. 4q du*tro4 *i,job kru&I ud
pq!4tr04 mioi
*$ic).
de *isffdodLr or 6cn cnproys! (B@,
edsffd €nFrq$ bo& b
bc
reeT).
oBniarb^ i no(
noE !n41iE (Ro6hs & rdgc, ,0?). &sid*,
CI{APTDR VI
CONCLUSIONI LIMITATIONAND SUCGf,STION
d€
PreFsd by 3rc0
wd, s
ud (otrr 0o&)
orc
d
joh e,ijirdotr
ir
6e
I
fusbdovsbpbo'dissfud}rqsDU*
.,bul6c$otD@njighl]r
GE
sE
n qLiL
cn!
06dE
high,
iob
& dr I $r rLnrc h
sisrdtoi
Ls
rcm
2
i
do
doi4 rhor iob tr
q ftn
job ed
,irl
$hiig
Ahm.
MM
erM'hnod,rF
{ffi!. Ao
(1@r).
rad djob $rifidb!
lnd
fu
@
(r@)
23,No]',06Pp'6@.d3
D A. aq6) rr n&dbcNdhd Rd{br
vvt
&try. L.M
0er) rt\rdas d
ot
PqrcuL|
nai.
^ c@t
o4orbdidi
&si9 h!jn