MUHAMMAD NADHIM 22010112140061 LAP KTI BAB VII

DAFTAR PUSTAKA
1.

Amirudin R. Fibrosis Hati dalam Buku Ajar Ilmu Penyakit Hati. 1st ed.
Jakarta: Jayabadi; 2007.

2.

Guyton A, Hall J. Buku Ajar Fisiologi Kedokteran. 9th ed. New york:
Guyton dan Hall; 2007.

3.

Jemal A, BRAY F, Melissa M, Parkin D, Ferlay J, Ward E, et al. Global
Cancer Statistics. A Cancer J Clin. 2011;61–90.

4.

Sulaiman A, Lesmana N. Buku Ajar Ilmu Penyakit Hati. Jakarta: Jayabadi;
2007.


5.

Marrer W. Orthorectifying Historical Imagery Using the Rational Function
Model. University of Redlands; 2012.

6.

Hirlan. Gastroenterohepatology : From Theory to Clinical Practice.
Semarang: Univeristas Dipenogoro; 2011.

7.

Feldman B. Gastrointestinal and Liver Disease. 9th ed. Elsevier S, editor.
Canada; 2010.

8.

Rilling W, Drooz A. Carcinoma, Multidisciplinary management of
hepatocellular. Radiol JVI, editor. 2002. 259-63 .


9.

Mor E, Kaspa R, Sheiner P. Treatment of hepatocelluker carcinoma
associated witch cirrhosis in the era of liver transplantation. 1998;643–53.

10.

Kew MC. Hepatocelluler carcinoma: Epidemology and riskfactor. J
Hepatocelluler Carcinoma. 2014;115–25.

11.

LaBrecque D, Friedman L, KR M, Grendell J. Current Diagnosis &
Treatment in Gastroenterology. Singapore: McGraw-Hill Education; 2003.

59



12.


60

Sherman M. Principles and Practice of Gastrointestinal Oncology. Kelsen
D, Daly J, B L, Tepper J, editors. Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer Business;
2008.

13.

Caldwell S. The epidemiology of hepatocelullar cancer : from the
perspectives of public health problem to tumor biology. Gastroenterology.
2009;96–100.

14.

N I, Wanda J. The increasing incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma. Med,
N Engl J; 1999. 798-9 .

15.


El-Serag H, Mason A. Rising incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma in the
United States. United States: N Engl J med; 1999. 745-50 .

16.

Heintges T, Wands J. Hepatitis C virus: epidemiology and transmission.
1997;26:521–6.

17.

Sherlock S, Dooley J. Disease of the Liver and Biliary System. London:
Blackwell Scientific Publications; 2001.

18.

Nurdjanah S. Sirosis Hati. In: Sudoyo A, Setiyohadi B, Alwi I,
Simadibratam M, Setiati S, editors. Buku Ajar Ilmu Penyakit Dalam.
Jakarta: Interna Publishing; 2009.

19.


Teufel A, Weinman A. Hepatocellular Carcinoma in patients with
autoimmune hepatitis. World J Gastroenterol. 2009;15:578–82.

20.

Kamel I, Bluemke D. Imaging evaluation of hepatocellular carcinoma.
2002;13:73–83.

21.

Saffroy R, Lemoine A, Debuire B. Mechanisms of hepatocarcinogenesis.
In: Atlas of Genetics and Cytogenetics in Oncology and Haematology.



61

2006.
22.


Bertino G, Carlo D, Ardiri A, Calvagno G, MalaguarneramG. Systemic
therapies in hepatocellular carcinoma. Futrue oncol. 2013;10:1533–48.

23.

Xu H, Yun-PengLiu, Guleng B, Ren J-L. Hepatitis B Virus-Related
Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Pathogenic Mechanisms and Novel Therapeutic
Interventions. Gastrointest Tumors. 2014;1:135–45.

24.

Chien R, Hsu Y, Yeh C, Sheen I, Chu C. Long-term outcome after
spontaneous HbeAG seronversion in patients witch chronic hepatitis B.
Hepatology. 2002;35:1522–7.

25.

Wu C, Salvay D, Forgues M, Valerie K, Farnworth J, Markin R.
Distinctive gen expression profiles associated with Hepatitis B virus x

protein. Oncogone. 2001;20:3674–82.

26.

Schafer D, Sorrel M. Hepatocellular Carcinoma. 1999;353:1253–7.

27.

Murray-lyon. Primary and secondary cancer of the liver. In: JC G, editor.
Carcinoma of the Liver, Biliary Tract and Pancreas. London: Edward
Arnold; 2002.

28.

Okuda K. Hepatocellular Carcinoma. J H, editor. 2000;32:225–7.

29.

Attali P, Houssin D, Roche A, Buffet C, Bismuth H, Etienne J. Hepatic
arterial embolization for malignant hypercalcemia in hepatocelluler

carcinoma. 2002;29:466.

30.

Minshan C, Yaqi Z. Karsinoma Hati Primer. 2nd ed. Desen W, editor.
Jakarta: Balai Penerbit Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Indonesia; 2008.

31.

Park Y. Update on precursor and early lesions of hepatocellular carcinoma.



62

2011;135:704–15.
32.

Kenwal K, Richardson P, El serag H. A new laboratory based algorithm to
predict developmentof hepatocelluler carcinoma patients with hepatic and

chirosis. Gastroenterology. 2014;146:1249–55.

33.

Tanaka S, Ari S. Molecular targeted therapies in hepatocellular carcinoma.
Semin Oncol. 2012;39:486–92.

34.

Namieno T, Kawata A, Sato N, Kondo Y, Uchino J. Age-Related, Different
Clincopathologic Features of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients.
2005;24:256–9.

35.

Kew MC. Hepatitis B virus infection : the burden of disease south Africa.
shoutern African J Epidemiol Infect. 2008;1:4–8.

36.


Hajime S, Osamu Y, Seki N, Arai M, Imzaeki F. Influence of Hepatitis B
virus Genotypes on the Progression of Chronic Type B Liver Disease.
2003;

37.

Gastroenterol T. Serum alpha-fetoprotein concentrationsin urban and rural
southern african blacks with hepatocelluler carcinoma. 2002;16:11–5.





63

LAMPIRAN 1

OUTPUT SPSS
Frequencies


Frequency Table

Tempat tinggal

Valid

Desa
Kota
Total

Frequency
79
24
103

Percent
76.7
23.3
100.0

Valid Percent
76.7
23.3
100.0

Cumulative
Percent
76.7
100.0

Daerah

Valid

Batang
Blora
Boyolali
Brebes
Demak
Grobogan
Jakarta
Jepara
Kendal
Kudus
Magelang
Pati
Pekalongan
Pemalang
Rembang
Semarang
Tegal
Total

Frequency
1
3
1
8
23
15
1
6
7
3
1
2
2
5
5
18
2
103

Percent
1.0
2.9
1.0
7.8
22.3
14.6
1.0
5.8
6.8
2.9
1.0
1.9
1.9
4.9
4.9
17.5
1.9
100.0

Valid Percent
1.0
2.9
1.0
7.8
22.3
14.6
1.0
5.8
6.8
2.9
1.0
1.9
1.9
4.9
4.9
17.5
1.9
100.0

Cumulative
Percent
1.0
3.9
4.9
12.6
35.0
49.5
50.5
56.3
63.1
66.0
67.0
68.9
70.9
75.7
80.6
98.1
100.0







64

Jenis kelamin

Valid

Frequency
84
19
103

Laki-laki
Perempuan
Total

Percent
81.6
18.4
100.0

Valid Percent
81.6
18.4
100.0

Cumulative
Percent
81.6
100.0



Pekerjaan

Valid

Bekerja
Tidak bekerja
Total

Frequency
71
32
103

Percent
68.9
31.1
100.0

Valid Percent
68.9
31.1
100.0

Cumulative
Percent
68.9
100.0



Koma hepatikum

Valid

Ada
Tidak ada
Total

Frequency
4
99
103

Percent
3.9
96.1
100.0

Valid Percent
3.9
96.1
100.0

Cumulative
Percent
3.9
100.0



Performance

Valid

PC
SC
IC
Total

Frequency
40
25
38
103

Percent
38.8
24.3
36.9
100.0

Valid Percent
38.8
24.3
36.9
100.0

Cumulative
Percent
38.8
63.1
100.0





65

Trombus

Valid

Ada
Tidak ada
Total

Frequency
40
63
103

Percent
38.8
61.2
100.0

Valid Percent
38.8
61.2
100.0

Cumulative
Percent
38.8
100.0



Asites

Valid

Tidak ada
Ringan
Berat
Total

Frequency
34
13
56
103

Percent
33.0
12.6
54.4
100.0

Valid Percent
33.0
12.6
54.4
100.0

Cumulative
Percent
33.0
45.6
100.0



Nodul

Valid

Single
Multiple
Total

Frequency
9
94
103

Percent
8.7
91.3
100.0

Valid Percent
8.7
91.3
100.0

Cumulative
Percent
8.7
100.0



CP

Valid

A
B
C
Total

Frequency
14
54
35
103

Percent
13.6
52.4
34.0
100.0

Valid Percent
13.6
52.4
34.0
100.0

Cumulative
Percent
13.6
66.0
100.0





66

BCLC

Valid

A
B
C
D
Total

Frequency
7
41
21
34
103

Percent
6.8
39.8
20.4
33.0
100.0

Valid Percent
6.8
39.8
20.4
33.0
100.0

Cumulative
Percent
6.8
46.6
67.0
100.0



Case Summaries
N
Umur
Bilirubin
Albumin
PPT
PPT kontrol
PPT selisih
Kadar AFP

103
103
103
103
103
103
103

Mean
47.07
3.4144
3.0399
14.8495
11.3680
3.4816
165.7164

Std. Deviation
12.810
4.29519
.76704
3.61060
1.18489
3.24958
194.03591

Median
47.00
1.9000
3.0000
14.2000
11.2000
2.8000
1.4800

Minimum
15
.33
1.50
10.20
9.00
.10
.00

Maximum
76
25.15
6.37
40.70
14.90
27.60
400.00





67

Crosstabs

Jenis kelamin * Tempat tinggal

Crosstab

Jenis kelamin

Laki-laki

Perempuan

Total

Count
Expected Count
% within Tempat tinggal
Count
Expected Count
% within Tempat tinggal
Count
Expected Count
% within Tempat tinggal

Tempat tinggal
Desa
Kota
62
22
64.4
19.6
78.5%
91.7%
17
2
14.6
4.4
21.5%
8.3%
79
24
79.0
24.0
100.0%
100.0%

Total
84
84.0
81.6%
19
19.0
18.4%
103
103.0
100.0%



Chi-Square Tests

Pearson Chi-Square
Continuity Correctiona
Likelihood Ratio
Fisher's Exact Test
Linear-by-Linear
Association
N of Valid Cases

Value
2.127 b
1.341
2.441

2.107

df
1
1
1

1

Asymp. Sig.
(2-sided)
.145
.247
.118

Exact Sig.
(2-sided)

Exact Sig.
(1-sided)

.229

.120

.147

103

a. Computed only for a 2x2 table
b. 1 cells (25.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 4.
43.





68

Pekerjaan * Tempat tinggal

Crosstab

Pekerjaan

Bekerja

Tidak bekerja

Total

Count
Expected Count
% within Tempat tinggal
Count
Expected Count
% within Tempat tinggal
Count
Expected Count
% within Tempat tinggal

Tempat tinggal
Desa
Kota
56
15
54.5
16.5
70.9%
62.5%
23
9
24.5
7.5
29.1%
37.5%
79
24
79.0
24.0
100.0%
100.0%

Total
71
71.0
68.9%
32
32.0
31.1%
103
103.0
100.0%



Chi-Square Tests

Pearson Chi-Square
Continuity Correctiona
Likelihood Ratio
Fisher's Exact Test
Linear-by-Linear
Association
N of Valid Cases

Value
.604b
.276
.591

.599

df
1
1
1

1

Asymp. Sig.
(2-sided)
.437
.599
.442

Exact Sig.
(2-sided)

Exact Sig.
(1-sided)

.458

.296

.439

103

a. Computed only for a 2x2 table
b. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 7.
46.





69

Koma hepatikum * Tempat tinggal

Crosstab

Koma hepatikum

Ada

Tidak ada

Total

Count
Expected Count
% within Tempat tinggal
Count
Expected Count
% within Tempat tinggal
Count
Expected Count
% within Tempat tinggal

Tempat tinggal
Desa
Kota
4
0
3.1
.9
5.1%
.0%
75
24
75.9
23.1
94.9%
100.0%
79
24
79.0
24.0
100.0%
100.0%

Total
4
4.0
3.9%
99
99.0
96.1%
103
103.0
100.0%



Chi-Square Tests

Pearson Chi-Square
Continuity Correctiona
Likelihood Ratio
Fisher's Exact Test
Linear-by-Linear
Association
N of Valid Cases

Value
1.264 b
.272
2.171

1.252

df
1
1
1

1

Asymp. Sig.
(2-sided)
.261
.602
.141

Exact Sig.
(2-sided)

Exact Sig.
(1-sided)

.571

.340

.263

103

a. Computed only for a 2x2 table
b. 2 cells (50.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is .
93.





70

Performance * Tempat tinggal

Crosstab

Performance

PC

SC

IC

Total

Count
Expected Count
% within Tempat tinggal
Count
Expected Count
% within Tempat tinggal
Count
Expected Count
% within Tempat tinggal
Count
Expected Count
% within Tempat tinggal

Tempat tinggal
Desa
Kota
30
10
30.7
9.3
38.0%
41.7%
20
5
19.2
5.8
25.3%
20.8%
29
9
29.1
8.9
36.7%
37.5%
79
24
79.0
24.0
100.0%
100.0%

Total
40
40.0
38.8%
25
25.0
24.3%
38
38.0
36.9%
103
103.0
100.0%



Chi-Square Tests

Pearson Chi-Square
Likelihood Ratio
Linear-by-Linear
Association
N of Valid Cases

Value
.220a
.225
.020

2
2

Asymp. Sig.
(2-sided)
.896
.894

1

.887

df

103

a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The
minimum expected count is 5.83.





71

Trombus * Tempat tinggal

Crosstab

Trombus

Ada

Tidak ada

Total

Tempat tinggal
Desa
Kota
31
9
30.7
9.3
39.2%
37.5%
48
15
48.3
14.7
60.8%
62.5%
79
24
79.0
24.0
100.0%
100.0%

Count
Expected Count
% within Tempat tinggal
Count
Expected Count
% within Tempat tinggal
Count
Expected Count
% within Tempat tinggal

Total
40
40.0
38.8%
63
63.0
61.2%
103
103.0
100.0%



Chi-Square Tests

Pearson Chi-Square
Continuity Correctiona
Likelihood Ratio
Fisher's Exact Test
Linear-by-Linear
Association
N of Valid Cases

Value
.023b
.000
.024

.023

df
1
1
1

1

Asymp. Sig.
(2-sided)
.878
1.000
.878

Exact Sig.
(2-sided)

Exact Sig.
(1-sided)

1.000

.538

.879

103

a. Computed only for a 2x2 table
b. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 9.
32.





72

Asites * Tempat tinggal

Crosstab

Asites

Tidak ada

Ringan

Berat

Total

Count
Expected Count
% within Tempat tinggal
Count
Expected Count
% within Tempat tinggal
Count
Expected Count
% within Tempat tinggal
Count
Expected Count
% within Tempat tinggal

Tempat tinggal
Desa
Kota
27
7
26.1
7.9
34.2%
29.2%
10
3
10.0
3.0
12.7%
12.5%
42
14
43.0
13.0
53.2%
58.3%
79
24
79.0
24.0
100.0%
100.0%

Total
34
34.0
33.0%
13
13.0
12.6%
56
56.0
54.4%
103
103.0
100.0%



Chi-Square Tests

Pearson Chi-Square
Likelihood Ratio
Linear-by-Linear
Association
N of Valid Cases

Value
.231a
.233
.228

2
2

Asymp. Sig.
(2-sided)
.891
.890

1

.633

df

103

a. 1 cells (16.7%) have expected count less than 5. The
minimum expected count is 3.03.





73

Nodul * Tempat tinggal

Crosstab

Nodul

Single

Multiple

Total

Tempat tinggal
Desa
Kota
7
2
6.9
2.1
8.9%
8.3%
72
22
72.1
21.9
91.1%
91.7%
79
24
79.0
24.0
100.0%
100.0%

Count
Expected Count
% within Tempat tinggal
Count
Expected Count
% within Tempat tinggal
Count
Expected Count
% within Tempat tinggal

Total
9
9.0
8.7%
94
94.0
91.3%
103
103.0
100.0%



Chi-Square Tests

Pearson Chi-Square
Continuity Correctiona
Likelihood Ratio
Fisher's Exact Test
Linear-by-Linear
Association
N of Valid Cases

Value
.006b
.000
.006

.006

df
1
1
1

1

Asymp. Sig.
(2-sided)
.936
1.000
.936

Exact Sig.
(2-sided)

Exact Sig.
(1-sided)

1.000

.650

.936

103

a. Computed only for a 2x2 table
b. 1 cells (25.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 2.
10.





74

Explore

Tempat tinggal
Case Summaries
Tempat tinggal
Desa

Kota

Total

N
Mean
Std. Deviation
Median
Minimum
Maximum
N
Mean
Std. Deviation
Median
Minimum
Maximum
N
Mean
Std. Deviation
Median
Minimum
Maximum

Umur
79
46.39
12.568
47.00
15
76
24
49.29
13.614
51.50
18
74
103
47.07
12.810
47.00
15
76

Bilirubin
79
3.4418
4.14554
1.9800
.33
25.15
24
3.3242
4.85008
1.8900
.57
23.16
103
3.4144
4.29519
1.9000
.33
25.15

Albumin
79
3.1115
.80562
3.0000
1.50
6.37
24
2.8042
.57671
2.7500
1.60
3.80
103
3.0399
.76704
3.0000
1.50
6.37



75

Case Summaries
Tempat tinggal
Desa

Kota

Total

PPT
N
Mean
Std. Deviation
Median
Minimum
Maximum
N
Mean
Std. Deviation
Median
Minimum
Maximum
N
Mean
Std. Deviation
Median
Minimum
Maximum

79
14.7278
3.83202
14.2000
10.20
40.70
24
15.2500
2.79223
14.9000
10.90
21.50
103
14.8495
3.61060
14.2000
10.20
40.70

PPT kontrol
79
11.4316
1.15654
11.2000
9.30
14.90
24
11.1583
1.27686
11.0000
9.00
13.80
103
11.3680
1.18489
11.2000
9.00
14.90

PPT selisih
79
3.2962
3.46870
2.4000
.10
27.60
24
4.0917
2.34945
3.5000
1.40
10.20
103
3.4816
3.24958
2.8000
.10
27.60



Tests of Normality
a

Umur
Bilirubin
Albumin
PPT
PPT kontrol
PPT selisih

Tempat tinggal
Desa
Kota
Desa
Kota
Desa
Kota
Desa
Kota
Desa
Kota
Desa
Kota

Kolmogorov-Smirnov
Statistic
df
Sig.
.045
79
.200*
.129
24
.200*
.240
79
.000
.346
24
.000
.066
79
.200*
.129
24
.200*
.199
79
.000
.106
24
.200*
.155
79
.000
.164
24
.094
.189
79
.000
.165
24
.089

Statistic
.996
.976
.646
.502
.958
.957
.643
.962
.917
.953
.595
.884

Shapiro-Wilk
df
79
24
79
24
79
24
79
24
79
24
79
24

Sig.
.998
.801
.000
.000
.011
.381
.000
.491
.000
.307
.000
.010

*. This is a lower bound of the true significance.
a. Lilliefors Significance Correction





Umur

Bilirubin

76



Albumin

PPT

77



78

PPT kontrol

PPT selisih

T-Test

Group Statistics

Umur

Tempat tinggal
Desa
Kota

N
79
24

Mean
46.39
49.29

Std. Deviation
12.568
13.614

Std. Error
Mean
1.414
2.779





79

Independent Samples Test

Levene's Test for
Equality of Variances
t-test for Equality of
Means

Umur
Equal variances
Equal variances
assumed
not assumed
.083
.774
-.971
-.930
101
35.745
.334
.359

F
Sig.
t
df
Sig. (2-tailed)
Mean Difference
Std. Error Difference
95% Confidence Interval
of the Difference

Lower
Upper

-2.899

-2.899

2.987

3.118

-8.824
3.025

-9.225
3.426

NPar Tests

Mann-Whitney Test

Ranks

Bilirubin

Tempat tinggal
Desa
Kota
Total

N
79
24
103

Mean Rank
52.40
50.69

Sum of Ranks
4139.50
1216.50



Test Statisticsa

Mann-Whitney U
Wilcoxon W
Z
Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed)

Bilirubin
916.500
1216.500
-.246
.806

a. Grouping Variable: Tempat tinggal





80

T-Test

Group Statistics

Albumin

Tempat tinggal
Desa
Kota

N
79
24

Mean
3.1115
2.8042

Std. Deviation
.80562
.57671

Std. Error
Mean
.09064
.11772



Independent Samples Test

Levene's Test for
Equality of Variances
t-test for Equality of
Means

Albumin
Equal variances
Equal variances
assumed
not assumed
1.373
.244
1.736
2.069
101
52.874
.086
.043

F
Sig.
t
df
Sig. (2-tailed)
Mean Difference
Std. Error Difference
95% Confidence Interval
of the Difference

Lower
Upper

.30735

.30735

.17704

.14857

-.04385
.65855

.00934
.60537

NPar Tests

Mann-Whitney Test

Ranks

PPT

PPT kontrol

PPT selisih

Tempat tinggal
Desa
Kota
Total
Desa
Kota
Total
Desa
Kota
Total

N
79
24
103
79
24
103
79
24
103

Mean Rank
49.85
59.06

Sum of Ranks
3938.50
1417.50

53.63
46.63

4237.00
1119.00

48.50
63.52

3831.50
1524.50





81



Crosstabs

Tempat tinggal * CP

Crosstab
CP
B

A
Tempat
tinggal

Desa

Kota

Total

Count
Expected Count
% within CP
Count
Expected Count
% within CP
Count
Expected Count
% within CP

12
10.7
85.7%
2
3.3
14.3%
14
14.0
100.0%

C

40
41.4
74.1%
14
12.6
25.9%
54
54.0
100.0%

27
26.8
77.1%
8
8.2
22.9%
35
35.0
100.0%

Total
79
79.0
76.7%
24
24.0
23.3%
103
103.0
100.0%



Chi-Square Tests

Pearson Chi-Square
Likelihood Ratio
Linear-by-Linear
Association
N of Valid Cases

Value
.849a
.917
.152

2
2

Asymp. Sig.
(2-sided)
.654
.632

1

.697

df

103

a. 1 cells (16.7%) have expected count less than 5. The
minimum expected count is 3.26.





82

Tempat tinggal * BCLC

Crosstab
BCLC
A
Tempat
tinggal

Desa

Kota

Total

Count
Expected Count
% within BCLC
Count
Expected Count
% within BCLC
Count
Expected Count
% within BCLC

B

7
5.4
100.0%
0
1.6
.0%
7
7.0
100.0%

31
31.4
75.6%
10
9.6
24.4%
41
41.0
100.0%

C

D

15
16.1
71.4%
6
4.9
28.6%
21
21.0
100.0%

26
26.1
76.5%
8
7.9
23.5%
34
34.0
100.0%

Total
79
79.0
76.7%
24
24.0
23.3%
103
103.0
100.0%



Chi-Square Tests
Value
2.481 a
4.053

Pearson Chi-Square
Likelihood Ratio
Linear-by-Linear
Association
N of Valid Cases

3
3

Asymp. Sig.
(2-sided)
.479
.256

1

.493

df

.470
103

a. 2 cells (25.0%) have expected count less than 5. The
minimum expected count is 1.63.



Explore


Tempat tinggal

Case Summaries
Kadar AFP
Tempat tinggal
Desa
Kota
Total

N
44
10
54

Mean
333.7166
238.5260
316.0887

Std. Deviation
142.65508
189.94657
155.01795

Median
400.0000
350.1900
400.0000

Minimum
.88
.50
.50

Maximum
400.00
400.00
400.00





83


Tests of Normality

Kadar AFP

Tempat tinggal
Desa
Kota

Shapiro-Wilk
Statistic
df
.492
44
.726
10

Sig.
.000
.002

a. Lilliefors Significance Correction





Kadar AFP






84

NPar Tests


Mann-Whitney Test

Ranks

Kadar AFP

Tempat tinggal
Desa
Kota
Total

N
44
10
54

Mean Rank
28.91
21.30

Sum of Ranks
1272.00
213.00




Test Statisticsa

Mann-Whitney U
Wilcoxon W
Z
Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed)

Kadar AFP
158.000
213.000
-1.749
.080

a. Grouping Variable: Tempat tinggal







85

Kadar AFP * Tempat tinggal Crosstabulation

Kadar
AFP

< 200

200 - 400

> 4000

Total

Count
Expected Count
% within Tempat tinggal
Count
Expected Count
% within Tempat tinggal
Count
Expected Count
% within Tempat tinggal
Count
Expected Count
% within Tempat tinggal

Tempat tinggal
Desa
Kota
8
4
9.8
2.2
18.2%
40.0%
2
1
2.4
.6
4.5%
10.0%
34
5
31.8
7.2
77.3%
50.0%
44
10
44.0
10.0
100.0%
100.0%

Total
12
12.0
22.2%
3
3.0
5.6%
39
39.0
72.2%
54
54.0
100.0%


Chi-Square Tests

Pearson Chi-Square
Likelihood Ratio
Linear-by-Linear
Association
N of Valid Cases

Value
3.021 a
2.784

2
2

Asymp. Sig.
(2-sided)
.221
.249

1

.096

df

2.775
54

a. 3 cells (50.0%) have expected count less than 5. The
minimum expected count is .56.



NPar Tests

Two-Sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test
Frequencies
Kadar AFP

Tempat tinggal
Desa
Kota
Total

N
44
10
54



86

Test Statisticsa

Most Extreme
Differences

Absolute
Positive
Negative

Kolmogorov-Smirnov Z
Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed)

Kadar AFP
.273
.000
-.273
.778
.579

a. Grouping Variable: Tempat tinggal







LAMPIRAN 2

87



Lampiran 3

88



89

LAMPIRAN 4
NO CM
C427771
C440851
C477700
C394670
C459110
C463443
C406414
C430854
C445682
C194653
C460841
C434409
C459488
C243738
C399458
C394928
C436488
C463589
C324507
C449106
C460817
C428737
C467625
C396036
C447716
C410085
C469115
C413055
C291264
C430422
123962
C486782
C479102
C412892
C422252
C490252
C445972
C446052
C487672

ALAMAT
Demak
Demak
Boyolali
Jepara
Grobogan
Demak
Demak
Grobogan
Grobogan
Blora
Grobogan
Magelang
Semarang
Semarang
Pekalongan
Demak
Brebes
Demak
Jepara
Kendal
Jakarta
Kendal
Banyumanik
Demak
Demak
Semarang
Brebes
Demak
Semarang
Semarang
Jepara
Pemalang
Grobogan
Demak
Semarang
Grobogan
Semarang
Semarang
Demak

Daerah UMUR KELAMIN
Desa
57 L
Desa
51 L
Desa
52 P
Desa
32 L
Desa
42 L
Desa
51 L
Desa
44 L
Desa
39 L
Desa
60 L
Desa
47 L
Desa
70 L
Kota
32 L
Kota
18 L
Kota
74 L
Kota
46 L
Desa
45 L
Desa
44 P
Desa
52 L
Kota
61 P
Desa
39 L
Kota
26 L
Desa
46 L
Kota
72 L
Desa
48 L
Desa
51 L
Kota
54 P
Desa
27 L
Desa
36 L
Kota
56 L
Kota
51 L
Kota
59 L
Kota
35 L
Desa
47 L
Desa
26 L
Kota
52 L
Desa
68 L
Kota
42 L
Kota
52 L
Desa
28 P

Kadar AFP
>400
26,79
>400
>400
16,8
Tidak ada
>400
Tidak ada
69,3
Tidak ada
>400
400
Tidak ada
Tidak ada
188,39
Tidak ada
>400
Tidak ada
>400
Tidak ada
>400
36,77
Tidak ada
Tidak ada
Tidak ada
Tidak ada
Tidak ada
Tidak ada
Tidak ada
>400
>400
Tidak ada
374,07
300,38
Tidak ada
Tidak ada
45,60
Tidak ada

CP
C
B
B
B
C
C
B
B
A
C
B
C
C
B
A
B
B
B
A
B
C
A
B
C
B
C
C
A
B
C
B
C
C
B
B
B
B
B
B

SKOR CP
10
7
7
9
12
12
7
8
6
10
9
10
12
8
6
9
7
9
5
7
11
5
8
10
8
13
12
6
8
10
7
11
12
9
7
9
7
9
7

BCLC
D
B
B
B
D
D
B
C
A
D
B
D
D
B
B
B
C
B
A
B
D
A
B
D
B
D
D
B
B
D
B
D
D
B
B
B
B
C
B



90

C415201
C456861
C429911
C490124
C481474
C395964
C424064
C486163
C411914
C454114
C503513
C466853
C367373
C410226
C504476
C503936
C436406
C449856
C406516
C209996
C492275
C500355
C483108
C493188
C520490
C506290
C553743
C529363
C538583
C486919
C484869
C485789
C468529
C408389
C462899
C520212
C558891
C544901
C198178
C503427
C487247
C454167

Demak
Demak
Brebes
Rembang
Pemalang
Grobogan
Demak
Jepara
Semarang
Jepara
Pemalang
Kendal
Blora
Rembang
Demak
Grobogan
Jepara
Pekalongan
Demak
Semarang
Semarang
Pemalang
Semarang
Rembang
Demak
Kendal
Demak
Tegal
Semarang
Brebes
Grobogan
Kudus
Brebes
Blora
Demak
Demak
Pemalang
Kudus
Semarang
Rembang
Grobogan
Grobogan

Desa
Desa
Desa
Desa
Desa
Desa
Desa
Desa
Kota
Desa
Desa
Desa
Desa
Desa
Desa
Desa
Desa
Kota
Desa
Kota
Kota
Desa
Kota
Desa
Desa
Desa
Desa
Kota
Kota
Desa
Desa
Desa
Desa
Desa
Desa
Desa
Desa
Desa
Kota
Desa
Desa
Desa

40
56
54
38
51
48
35
50
53
42
65
23
48
53
33
46
45
42
59
65
65
37
32
38
28
33
55
59
47
72
53
55
45
58
44
15
39
39
59
36
43
48

L
L
L
L
L
L
L
P
L
L
L
L
P
P
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
P
L
L
P
P
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
P
P
L
P
P
L
L
L

>400
Tidak ada
>400
Tidak ada
>400
Tidak ada
>400
Tidak ada
>400
Tidak ada
1,48
>400
Tidak ada
Tidak ada
>400
>400
>400
Tidak ada
0,88
Tidak ada
Tidak ada
>400
Tidak ada
1,59
Tidak ada
>400
>400
>400
Tidak ada
>400
>400
>400
>400
Tidak ada
Tidak ada
>400
Tidak ada
Tidak ada
>400
Tidak ada
12,01
>400

B
C
B
B
C
B
B
C
C
B
B
B
A
C
B
A
B
B
B
B
C
C
B
B
C
A
C
B
B
B
C
C
A
B
C
A
B
A
C
B
B
B

7
12
7
8
10
9
7
12
10
8
8
7
5
10
9
6
7
8
8
9
11
10
8
9
10
5
5
8
9
9
11
11
6
8
10
5
9
5
11
9
8
7

B
D
C
B
D
C
B
D
D
B
B
C
A
D
B
C
C
B
B
C
D
D
C
B
D
A
C
C
B
B
D
D
C
B
D
A
C
A
D
C
C
B



91

C434557
C422837
C425557
C498017
C467637
C546321
C536030
C548650
C554043
C522413
C515784
C547424
C527014
C529734
C544044

Pati
Demak
Grobogan
Rembang
Brebes
Brebes
Demak
Tegal
Grobogan
Batang
Demak
Kudus
Kendal
Kendal
Kendal

Desa
Desa
Desa
Desa
Desa
Desa
Desa
Kota
Desa
Desa
Desa
Desa
Desa
Desa
Desa

30
49
45
66
29
64
20
46
49
76
43
50
39
48
67

C561706 Semarang

Kota

C544044
C554524
C519956
C533936
C513717
C547857




















Semarang
Grobogan
Semarang
Brebes
Pati
Grobogan






Kota
Desa
Kota
Desa
Desa
Desa












P
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
P
L
L
L

>400
>400
>400
>400
Tidak ada
Tidak ada
Tidak ada
Tidak ada
>400
Tidak ada
392,22
Tidak ada
Tidak ada
Tidak ada
Tidak ada

C
C
C
C
C
C
A
B
B
B
B
A
C
B
B

10
12
12
11
12
10
6
9
9
7
8
6
10
7
8

D
D
D
D
D
D
B
B
B
B
C
B
D
B
C

54 L

2,01

B

42
61
44
30
57
61






L
P
L
L
L
L






Tidak ada
Tidak ada
>400
Tidak ada
>400
>400






B
C
A
C
B
B












C
D
C
D
B
C
























7 B
9
10
6
12
9
8



BIODATA
Identitas
Nama : Muhammad Nadhim R P
NIM : 22010112140061
Tempat/Tanggal lahir : Jombang, 16 Desember1994
Jenis Kelamin : Laki-laki
Alamat : Jalan Gombel Permai III 78 Semarang
Nomor HP : 085727120120
Email : nadhimrizka@yahoo.co.id
Riwayat Pendidikan Formal
1. SD : SD Islam Hidayatullah Semarang Lulus Tahun: 2006
2. SMP : SMP Negeri 21 Semarang Lulus Tahun: 2009
3. SMA : SMA Negeri 4 Semarang Lulus Tahun: 2012
4. FK UNDIP : Masuk Tahun: 2012



92