Internasional Seminar The Bali Tourism Forum International.
Tourists’ Preferences
toward Peace Tourism Product
For Ground Zero Monument In Kuta Bali.
Nyoman Ariana1), Made Sukana2) INyomanJaminAriana3)
1
FakultasPariwisata, UniversitasUdayana email: [email protected]
2
FakultasPariwisata, UniversitasUdayana email: [email protected]
3
FakultasPariwisata, UniversitasUdayana email: [email protected]
Abstract
Peace tourism is a product that combines tourism with social harmony. It is very important to be conducted a research because of people's living conditions often happen several social deviations such as: criminality, inter-eth i o fli t, a d dishar o y a o g religio s. Based o that’s a kgrou d the goal of this study is to analyze the preferences of tourists toward the development of Ground Zero Monument as a peace tourism product in Kuta Bali. The concepts that are used to solve the research focus are the concept of peace tourism and the development of tourism products. The approaches that are used on this research are Integrating research between qualitative and quantitative approaches. Methods of data collection are conducted by making observations (observation), questionnaires, interviews, and documents. Meanwhile, to define of variable operational is determined to be several attributes are: physical attractiveness; non-physical attractiveness; visiting activities of tourist; facilities; transport; souvenirs; and service. Samples of research is determined by purposive sampling is taken as many as 100 tourists. Data is analyzed by method of conjoint analysis that is the effort to evaluate the value of the product by combining a number of values offered of each attribute. The results show that the preferences of tourists toward the product of peace tourism on Ground Zero Monument Kuta Bali are: it is necessary to offer statue of monument (miniature) and the history book of monument as a souvenir for the tourists, (-0.330), providing adequate monument facilities(-0.302), giving a special place for tourists to pray (-0.257), package products to accommodate the values of peace symbols (-0.210), packaging of monument design that is interesting for the tourist (-0.067), should be provided interpreters (guides to explain the monument) (-0.050), and it is not provided the transportation for the tourist because they are more likely to use private transport (-0.050). While the level of interest rates in the product of peace tourism in Monument Ground Zero from highest to lowest based attribute utility value is as follows: souvenirs (16.509%), physical attractiveness (15.775%), services (14.889%), non-physical attractiveness (14.461% ), facilities (13.820%), attractions (12.648%), and transports (11.898).
(2)
1. INTRODUCTION
The development of peace through tourism in the history of academic, slightly created by tourism experts. One expert who studied peaceful tourism is Salazar in 2006 to focus his studies on Building a Culture of Peace through Tourism. In addition to these ideas, opinions in building peace tourism also are proposed by the two national leaders: firstly, the former of president Megawati Sukarno Putri Introduce peace through tourism in grand event ATF (Asian Tourism Forum) in Yogyakarta in 2005. While both President Susilo Bambang Yodhoyono provide an appreciation of tourism, that peace can be achieved through the development of tourism. The presidential statement was delivered at the inauguration of the Institute of Peace and Democracy. (Ariana: 2011).
Tourism Destination of Kuta is one of the most famous of tourist attraction in Bali and is one of a magnet for foreign tourists who have been known since the early history of the development of tourism in Bali (since 1920). Kuta as excellent tourism destination in Bali then appropriate that as a trade mark and a window in the international tourism in Bali (The Window of Tourism for Bali). (Pitana et al: 2000 case 3-4)
Exploring and packaging of peace potential as a new tourist product that is used to counterweight cover the condition of current Kuta tourism. Some research suggests that Kuta has a relatively high crime rate Mahagangga (2011). Besides that the findings of Ariana (2011) there are some negative impacts of tourism on the Kuta communities are: people's lifestyles tend to imitate western style, collectivity replaced individual characters, transformation of land, and unfair competetion in the business world. Based both on the study of tourism from the positive and negative impacts in related to socio cultural and economic. Infact there are still opportunities in the kuta area to build tourism that leads to wisdom (peacefulness) and uniqueness of the local communities. There are several reasons that reinforce those reasons are: their history of inter-ethnic acculturation, the establishment of Ground Zero monument as a monument of peace, and the high activity of the traditions and the application of philosophical values of resident. Exploring the potential of new tourism particularly on community value and essence in tourism, reinforced by Richard and Wilson (2007) who said that, there is a fundamental change from the stage of development of tourism is often popularized by the tourism style. It used to lead to the development of mass tourism, furthermore became tourism treat which leads to utilization of culture quality (cultural tourism). This change does not stop at the central, but again experienced a shift towards creativity in new venture packaging business on tourism. The Real of packaging, leads to new experiences based products of peace tourism.
It is related to background is very necessary to be done research that is related to humanitarian values (humanist) such as: solidarity, justice, harmony, democracy, and friendship through the utilization of Ground Zero Monument to serve as a symbol of peace for the development of tourism towards peace in Tourism Destination of Kuta. So that the monument is not only longer remembered as the place gave rise to hatred and revenge, but it could be self-introspection to develop tourism in accordance with the
(3)
values and culture of nation and learning a sense of compassion with echoes of peace through tourism development.
Based on that’s systematic thinking, the problem of research can be formulated is: how preferences tourists through tourism products of peace in Ground Zero Monument Kuta Bali.
2. LITERATURE
Peace Tourism
Salazar (2006) in an article entitled Building a Culture of Peace through Tourism: Reflexive and Analytical Notes and Queries said that "peace cannot be seen directly and relatively is difficult for measuring. However, peace can be interpreted as an action/behavior that the absence of war, terrorism, and violence. This view is completed by giving a definition that peace of tourism (tourism peace) is a new concept in the scientific of tourism. Peaceful tourism can be defined as a freedom, peace andwithout wars are constructed from inner peace, natural environment and God.
Kim et al (2007) in an article entitled Using Tourism to Promote Peace on the Korean Peninsula in the Annals of Research Tourism, said that tourism is very potential made an effort to promote the value of peace to the local community. For example, the tourism activity was found to reduce inter-state conflict between South Korea and North Korea. Added results of research conducted by Ki Lee et al (2011) published in The International Journal of Tourism Research. The good ways to create peacefulness is to build tourism through making combination strategy of government policy, political and cultural values. Other finding about the definition of peaceful tourism is proposed by Damore (1998), peaceful tourism is tourism development that accelerates mutual understanding in the society. Tourism development that takes into account the strength of tourism will be able to help humankind to a life of peace and harmony.
3. RESEARCH METHODS
3.1 Location of Research
This research was conducted at Ground Zero Monument in Kuta, Badung Regency, Bali Province. There are several reasons for choosing the location of this research are: (1) this monument as the only memorial Bali bombing tragedy. (2) Kuta as an excellent tourism destination in Bali, (3) Kuta has heterogeneous society. (4) Kuta known as a friendly and exotic destination, and (5) The monument is visited by many tourists both domestic and foreign.
3.2 Scope of Research
(4)
and nonphysical which will be offered to tourists at Ground Zero Monument. The limitation of study variables tourists preference againts peacefully tourism products which can be divided into several parts such as: seven (7) variables and 14 (fourteen) indicators. The number of variables included: (1) physical attractiveness (design and arrangement of the monuments and architectural monuments; (2) non-physical attractiveness (pluralism and harmonization and a symbol of peace); tourism activities (praying and sightseeing); facilities (public and monuments); transport (public transport and private vehicles); souvenirs (CD & t-shirt monument and miniature monuments and history); services (interpreter (guides) and individually.
Table 3.1 the Variables of Research
Atribute Level Sub-atribute
A Physical Attraction 1 2
A1. Monument Design A2. Monument Architure B Non Physical Attraction 3
4
B1. Pluralism dan Harmonization B2. Symbol of Peacefullness C Tourism Activities 5
6
C1. Prayer C2. Sightseeing
D Facilities 7
8
D1. Public D2. Monument
E Transportation 9
10
E1. Public Transport E2. Private Vehicle
F Souvenir 11
12
F1. CD and Monument T-Shirt
F2. Miniature of Monument and History
G Services 13
14
G1. Interpreteter (Guide) G2. Individually
3.3 Data Collection
Data collection is done by observation, documentation studies, interviews and questionnaires. But for this research focus is more emphasis on spread and fullfill of questionnaires. The list of questions is compiled based on the rankings to determine the extent of agreement or disagreement to the question posed in the form of stimuli or peaceful tourism product packaging.
3.4 Data Analysis
The analysis used in this study is the conjoint analysis. According Gudono (2012) very precise conjoint analysis is used to examine the effects of the attributes of an object or service simultaneously to the person's preference for certain objects or services. While (Hair et al, 2006, adding, conjoint is an attempt to evaluate the value of the product/service/idea (real or hypothetical) by combining a number of value offered of each attribute. Basically utility is the concept of measuring the value of conjoint analysis, the evaluation is unique from every individual subjectively. Includes all the features of a product or services, whether tangible or intangible, and therefore measured throughout preferences. In the conjoint analysis, the utility is using the assumptions underlying the value in each level in every attribute and shows how the interrelationships utility formulated for combination of many attributes. To facilitate this
(5)
research analysis process is assisted by using SPSS version 19.
4. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
4.1 Results of Tourist Preference for Peace Tourism Products
The main analytical tool used in this research is the conjoin analysis. The analysis assumes that peaceful tourist product can be defined as a series of level-specific attributes, as well as utilities tourists choice in all is determined by the partial utilities (part-worth) which further contributed by each level attribute in a peaceful tourist product. This analysis can provide a combination of attributes identifying a peaceful tourism of the most preferred by tourists and the identification of the relative importance of each attribute/variable.
Table 4.1 The Number of Attributes and Sub-attribute Tourism product of Peace
Atribute Level Sub-atribute
A Physical Attraction 1 2
A1. Monument Design A2. Monument Architure B Non Physical Attraction 3
4
B1. Pluralism dan Harmonization B2. Simbol of peace
C Tourism Activities 5 6
C1. Prayer C2. Sightseeing
D Facilities 7
8
D1. Public D2. Monument E Transportation 9
10
E1. Public Transport E2. Private Vehicle
F Souvenir 11
12
F1. CD and Monument T-Shirt
F2. Miniature of Monument and History
G Services 13
14
G1. Interpreteter (Guide) G2. Walking Guest
The purpose to limit the number of attributes and the level used to avoid complications in processing the data. With a limited number of tourists it will be easier to choose a combination of stimuli in ranking. In this study used seven attributes/variables and 14 sub attribute (level) (Table 4.1.). Possible combinations are formed from different of sub attribute are2 x 2 x 2 x 2 x 2 x 2 x 2 = 128 stimuli.
Table 4.2 The Results of Orthogonal Procedure: Stimuli for Preferences of Peace Tourism Product
Stimuli Physical
Attraction
Non Physical
Attraction Activities Facilities Transportation Souvenir Service
1 Monument
Design
Pluralism and
Harmonization Sightseeing Public
Public Transportation Monument Miniature and History Individually
2 Monument
Architecture
Pluralism and
Harmonization Prayer Monument Private Vehicle
Monument Miniature and
History
Interpreter
(6)
Design Transportation Miniature and History
4 Monument
Design
Pluralism and
Harmonization Prayer Public
Public Transportation CD and Monument T-Shirt Interpreter
5 Monument
Architecture
Pluralism and
Harmonization Sightseeing Monument
Public Transportation CD and Monument T-Shirt Individually
6 Monument
Architecture Symbol of Peace Prayer Public Private Vehicle
CD and Monument
T-Shirt
Individually
7 Monument
Design Symbol of Peace Sightseeing Monument Private Vehicle
CD and Monument
T-Shirt
Interpreter
8 Monument
Architecture Symbol of Peace Sightseeing Public
Public Transportation CD and Monument T-Shirt Interpreter
Theoretically, Table 4.2 Based on respondent should assess 128 stimuli with a combination of attributes each of which is impractical and difficult for the respondent/tourists. Therefore, it is used in a way that is orthogonal procedure (SPSS) to help create a combination of stimuli of 18 possibilities, so not all combinations should be analyzed further (Table 5.9), so found eight stimuli. The stimuli are then represented into eight types of peace tourism products which each have different attribute combinations.
The perceptions of respondents are sorted from 1 to 8 to mark the types of tourism products peace most preferred (1) to the other tourism products peace least preferred (8). The choosing of tourist is referred to as utility expressed with numbers and forms the basis conjoint in tracking preferences. Tourist preferences in choosing a travel product peacefully found that the attributes and sub-attributes preferred by tourists are as follows: First, souvenir attribute has the highest percentage of the value of the relative importance of which 16 509%. Associated with tourists sub attribute is more like statues and historical monuments (score of -0.330) compared with CD and T-shirt Monument (score 0.330). Second, the attributes of physical attractiveness to the percentage value relative importance preferably 15 775% rating is the design and arrangement of the monument (a score of -0.069) compared with the architecture of the monument (a score of -0.067). Third, the service attribute with a value of 14 889% relative importance, respondents preferred the interpreter services (guides) (score of -0.050) than self-service by tourists (a score of 0,050). Fourth, non-physical attractiveness relative importance value 14 461%, of the respondents preferred the peace symbol (a score of -0.210) than pluralism and harmonization (score 0.210). Furthermore Fifth, the attribute value relative importance facilities by 13 820%, of the respondents preferred the monument facilities (score of -0.302) than public facilities (score of -0.302). Namely attributes Tourist Attraction sixth with 12,648% value relative importance, respondents prefer to pray (score -0.257) compared with the roads (score 0.257). And Seventh namely transport attribute with a value of 11 898% interest, respondents preferred private vehicles (a score of -0.042) compared with public transport (score -0.042). For more details are presented in Table 4.3 and
(7)
Table 4.3 Assessment Rating and Utilities General Preferences of Peace Tourism Product
Attribute Sub-Attribute Utility Preference
Non Physical Attraction Monument Design -.067
Monument Design
Monument Architure .067
Non Physical Attraction Pluralism dan Harmonization .210
Symbol of Peacefullness Symbol of Peacefullness -.210
Tourism Activities Prayer -.257
Prayer
Sightseeing .257
Facilities Public .302
Facilities of Monument
Facilities of Monument -.302
Transportation Public Transport .042
Private Vehicle
Private Vehicle -.042
Souvenir CD and Monument T-Shirt .330
Miniature of Monument and History
Miniature of Monument and History
-.330
Services Interpreter (Guide) -.050
Interpreter (Guide)
Individually .050
(Constant) 4.490
Tabel 4.4 Importance Values of Peace Tourism Product
Attribute Importance Values (%)
Physical Attraction 15.775
Non Physical Attraction 14.461
Tourist Activities 12.648
Facilities 13.820
Transportation 11.898
Souvenirs 16.509
Services 14.889
Pearson and Kendall correlation are relatively strong yield figures specifically 1,000 and 1,000 (above 0.5). This case indicates a strong relationship between the estimated and factual, which means that the calculation of the regression model strongly correlate with the data obtained by rating the opinion of the choice of travel products peace. And for the coefficient a = 5%. In the value of significance test of sixth correlation is obtained of 0.000 (below 0.05), the correlation is strong enough to have significance because it is below the value of the coefficient a = 5% (0.05). Thus, it can be concluded that the opinions of 100 respondents / rating may be acceptable to describe the preferences of tourists to travel products Ground Zero Monument peace in Kuta Bali.
(8)
Tabel 4.5 Correlations between observed and estimated preferences
Method Value Sig.
Pearson's R 1.000 .000
Kendall's tau 1.000 .000
5. CONCLUSION
The Tourist preferences towards product on a peace tour Ground Zero Monument Kuta Bali is necessary to provide statue monument (miniature) and historical monuments as a souvenir book, (-0.330), provided adequate monument facilities (-0.302), giving a special place for travelers to pray ( -0.257), packaging products to accommodate the values of peace symbols (-0.210), pack the design and arrangement of good and interesting monuments (-0.067), need to be provided interpreters (guides to explain) monument (-0.050), unnecessary provided the transportation vehicles because tourists are more likely to use private vehicles (-0.050). While the level of interest in the peaceful tourist product in Monument Ground Zero from highest to lowest based attribute utility value is as follows: souvenir (16.509%), physical attractiveness (15.775%), services (14.889%), non-physical attractiveness (14.461%), facilities (13.820%), attractions (12.648%), and transport (11.898).
6.REFERENCES
Abramson,J. and Mizrahi, T. 1994. Examining Social Work/Physician Colaboration ; an Application of Grounded Theory Methods Dalam Blaxter, L. Hughes, C. dan Tight, M. 2001. How To Research.
Second Edition. Maidenhead, Berkshire. England. Alih Bahasa Agustina. How To Research Seluk-Beluk Melakukan Riset. PT Indeks Kelompok Gramedia.
Anonim. 2005. Peraturan Daerah Propinsi Tingkat I Bali No. 3 Tahun 2005 Tentang Penetapan Kawasan Pariwisata di Bali.
Ariana, Nyoman. 2011. Peluang Pariwisata Damai di Bali Dalam Putra, Darma dan Pitana I Gde. Hiperdemokrasi Dalam Pembangunan Pariwisata Persembahan Untuk Prof. Ida Bagus Adnyana Manuaba. (hal 71-86). Pustaka Larasan. Denpasar.
Aritonang R. L. R. 2005. Kepuasan Pelanggan Pengukuran dan Penganalisisan dengan SPSS. Jakarta : PT Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
Blaxter, L. Hughes, C. dan Tight, M. 2001. How To Research. Second Edition. Maidenhead, Berkshire. England. Alih Bahasa Agustina. How To Research Seluk-Beluk Melakukan Riset. PT Indeks Kelompok Gramedia.
Chanwick Robin A. (1994) Concepts, Definitions and measures used in travel and tourism research. In Travel Tourism, and Hospitality Research, A handbook for Manager and Researchers.Editor J.R. Brent Ritchie and Charles R. Goeldner second edition. John Wiley and Sons,Inc Canada.
(9)
Dinas Pariwisata Propinsi Bali, 2001. Perkembangan Akomodasi di Propinsi Bali Tahun 1996-2000. Denpasar. Bali.
Gudono, 2012. Analisi Data Multivariat. BPFE. Yogyakarta
Ki Lee Choong, Lawrence J. Bendle, Yoo Shik Yoon, Myung-Ja Kim. 2011. Thanatourism or peace tourism : perceived value at a North Korean Resort From Indigenous Perspective. International Journal of Tourism Reserach Vol 14, issue 1 page 71-90.January/pebruari 2012.
Kim, Samuel Seongseop, et all. 2007.Using Tourism To Promote Peace On The Korean Peninsula. dalam Annal Of Tourism Recearch Vol.34, No. 2, pp291-309.
Kusmayadi dan Sugiarto, E. 2000. Metodologi Penelitian alam Bidang Kepariwisataan. Jakarta : PT Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
Mahagangga, Oka. 2011. Tantangan Keamanan Pariwisata Bali: Kajian Pemetaan Kriminalitas di Daerah Wisata Bali. Dalam Putra, Darma dan Pitana I Gde. Hiperdemokrasi Dalam Pembangunan Pariwisata Persembahan Untuk Prof. Ida Bagus Adnyana Manuaba. Pustaka Larasan. Denpasar.
Mak James. 2008. Developing A Dream Destination : Tourism And Tourism Policy Planning In Hawai. Versa Press. Hawai
Margana Sri. 2011. Kolonialisme Kebudayaan dan Kebalian: Dari Konggres Kebudayaan Bali I Tahun 1937 disampaikan pada Seminar Nasional Kebudayaan Dalam Rangka Dies Natalis UNUD Ke 49. Universitas Udayana Denpasar.
Murni, Ni. N. S. 1995. Pariwisata I. Bandung : Pusat Pengembangan Pendidikan Politeknik. Palguna, A. A. N. 2001. Dinamika Masyarakat Menuju Civil Society (Study Kasus) Objek Wisata Alas Kedaton di Desa Kukuh Kecamatan Marga Kabupaten Tabanan (Tesis). Denpasar : Univesitas Udayana. Pendit, N. S. 1997. Ilmu Pariwisata Sebuah Pengantar. Jakarta : PT Pradnya Paramita. Pitana, I Gede dkk.
2000. Kuta Cermin Retak Pariwisata Bali. Bali Post, Denpasar Bali. Pitana, I G. Dan Surya D, I. K. 2009. Pengantar Ilmu Pariwisata. CV Andi Offset. Yogyakarta.
Pujani, L.P. K. 2000. Pekerja Anak Pada Sektor Informal Penjual Postcard di Objek Wisata Tanah Lot, Tabanan, Bali (Studi Tentang Pemaknaan kerja Dalam Perspektif Budaya Kewiraswataan ) (Tesis). Denpasar : Universitas Udayana.
Putra, H. S. A (et al), 1998. Model Pariwisata pedesaan Sebagai Alternatif Pembangunan Berkelanjutan. Yogyakarta : Lembaga Penelitian Universitas Gadjah Mada.
Richards G. Wilson Julie. Tourism, Creativity and Development. Routledge. USA and Canada. Riduwan. 2003. Dasar-Dasar Statistik, Cet. 3 Bandung : Alfabeta.
(10)
Reisinger, Yvette and Turner Lindsay. 2003. Cross-Cultural Behaviour In Tourism Concepts and Analysis. An imprint of elseiver Science Limited Linacre House. Butter Heinemann. Great Britain
Sharpley. Richard. 2005 Managing The Coutryside for Tourism : a Governance Perspective dalam Pender. Lesley and Sharpley. Richard. The Management of Tourism . SAGE Publication. California.
Spillane. J. J. 1987. Ekonomi Pariwisata Sejarah dan Prosfeknya :Yogyakarta : Kanisius. Surjandari,Isti. 2009. Conjoint Analisis : Konsep dan Aplikasi. Trisakti Jakarta.
Suryasih, Ida Ayu. 2008. Pengelolaan Objek dan Daya Tarik Wisata Berbasis Tri Hita Karana. Dalam Majalah Analisis Pariwisata. Vol. 8, No. 2, 2008 Hal 25-29.
Tom Baum and Jithendran Kokkranikal “ Human Resources Management in Tourism” dalam buku yang berjudul : The Management of Tourism karya : Lesley Pender and Richard Sharpley.
Yoeti, O. A. 1997. Perencanaan Pengembangan Pariwisata, Jakarta : PT. Pradnya Paramita. Zalazar,Noel B. 2006. Building a Culture of Peace Though Tourism : Reflexive and Analytical Notes and Queries. Universitas Humanistica, No. 62. Fcs, Facultad De Ciencias Sociales. http:www.javariana.edu.co. 17 Desember 2008.
(1)
research analysis process is assisted by using SPSS version 19. 4. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
4.1 Results of Tourist Preference for Peace Tourism Products
The main analytical tool used in this research is the conjoin analysis. The analysis assumes that peaceful tourist product can be defined as a series of level-specific attributes, as well as utilities tourists choice in all is determined by the partial utilities (part-worth) which further contributed by each level attribute in a peaceful tourist product. This analysis can provide a combination of attributes identifying a peaceful tourism of the most preferred by tourists and the identification of the relative importance of each attribute/variable.
Table 4.1 The Number of Attributes and Sub-attribute Tourism product of Peace
Atribute Level Sub-atribute
A Physical Attraction 1
2
A1. Monument Design A2. Monument Architure B Non Physical Attraction 3
4
B1. Pluralism dan Harmonization B2. Simbol of peace
C Tourism Activities 5
6
C1. Prayer C2. Sightseeing
D Facilities 7
8
D1. Public D2. Monument
E Transportation 9
10
E1. Public Transport E2. Private Vehicle
F Souvenir 11
12
F1. CD and Monument T-Shirt
F2. Miniature of Monument and History
G Services 13
14
G1. Interpreteter (Guide) G2. Walking Guest
The purpose to limit the number of attributes and the level used to avoid complications in processing the data. With a limited number of tourists it will be easier to choose a combination of stimuli in ranking. In this study used seven attributes/variables and 14 sub attribute (level) (Table 4.1.). Possible combinations are formed from different of sub attribute are2 x 2 x 2 x 2 x 2 x 2 x 2 = 128 stimuli.
Table 4.2 The Results of Orthogonal Procedure: Stimuli for Preferences of Peace Tourism Product
Stimuli Physical Attraction
Non Physical
Attraction Activities Facilities Transportation Souvenir Service
1 Monument
Design
Pluralism and
Harmonization Sightseeing Public
Public Transportation Monument Miniature and History Individually
2 Monument
Architecture
Pluralism and
Harmonization Prayer Monument Private Vehicle
Monument Miniature and
History
Interpreter
(2)
Design Transportation Miniature and History
4 Monument
Design
Pluralism and
Harmonization Prayer Public
Public Transportation CD and Monument T-Shirt Interpreter
5 Monument
Architecture
Pluralism and
Harmonization Sightseeing Monument
Public Transportation CD and Monument T-Shirt Individually
6 Monument
Architecture Symbol of Peace Prayer Public Private Vehicle
CD and Monument
T-Shirt
Individually
7 Monument
Design Symbol of Peace Sightseeing Monument Private Vehicle
CD and Monument
T-Shirt
Interpreter
8 Monument
Architecture Symbol of Peace Sightseeing Public
Public Transportation CD and Monument T-Shirt Interpreter
Theoretically, Table 4.2 Based on respondent should assess 128 stimuli with a combination of attributes each of which is impractical and difficult for the respondent/tourists. Therefore, it is used in a way that is orthogonal procedure (SPSS) to help create a combination of stimuli of 18 possibilities, so not all combinations should be analyzed further (Table 5.9), so found eight stimuli. The stimuli are then represented into eight types of peace tourism products which each have different attribute combinations.
The perceptions of respondents are sorted from 1 to 8 to mark the types of tourism products peace most preferred (1) to the other tourism products peace least preferred (8). The choosing of tourist is referred to as utility expressed with numbers and forms the basis conjoint in tracking preferences. Tourist preferences in choosing a travel product peacefully found that the attributes and sub-attributes preferred by tourists are as follows: First, souvenir attribute has the highest percentage of the value of the relative importance of which 16 509%. Associated with tourists sub attribute is more like statues and historical monuments (score of -0.330) compared with CD and T-shirt Monument (score 0.330). Second, the attributes of physical attractiveness to the percentage value relative importance preferably 15 775% rating is the design and arrangement of the monument (a score of -0.069) compared with the architecture of the monument (a score of -0.067). Third, the service attribute with a value of 14 889% relative importance, respondents preferred the interpreter services (guides) (score of -0.050) than self-service by tourists (a score of 0,050). Fourth, non-physical attractiveness relative importance value 14 461%, of the respondents preferred the peace symbol (a score of -0.210) than pluralism and harmonization (score 0.210). Furthermore Fifth, the attribute value relative importance facilities by 13 820%, of the respondents preferred the monument facilities (score of -0.302) than public facilities (score of -0.302). Namely attributes Tourist Attraction sixth with 12,648% value relative importance, respondents prefer to pray (score -0.257) compared with the roads (score 0.257). And Seventh namely transport attribute with a value of 11 898% interest, respondents preferred private vehicles (a score of -0.042) compared with public transport (score -0.042). For more details are presented in Table 4.3 and
(3)
Table 4.3 Assessment Rating and Utilities General Preferences of Peace Tourism Product
Attribute Sub-Attribute Utility Preference
Non Physical Attraction Monument Design -.067
Monument Design
Monument Architure .067
Non Physical Attraction Pluralism dan Harmonization .210
Symbol of Peacefullness
Symbol of Peacefullness -.210
Tourism Activities Prayer -.257
Prayer
Sightseeing .257
Facilities Public .302
Facilities of Monument
Facilities of Monument -.302
Transportation Public Transport .042
Private Vehicle
Private Vehicle -.042
Souvenir CD and Monument T-Shirt .330
Miniature of Monument and History
Miniature of Monument and History
-.330
Services Interpreter (Guide) -.050
Interpreter (Guide)
Individually .050
(Constant) 4.490
Tabel 4.4 Importance Values of Peace Tourism Product
Attribute Importance Values (%)
Physical Attraction 15.775
Non Physical Attraction 14.461
Tourist Activities 12.648
Facilities 13.820
Transportation 11.898
Souvenirs 16.509
Services 14.889
Pearson and Kendall correlation are relatively strong yield figures specifically 1,000 and 1,000 (above 0.5). This case indicates a strong relationship between the estimated and factual, which means that the calculation of the regression model strongly correlate with the data obtained by rating the opinion of the choice of travel products peace. And for the coefficient a = 5%. In the value of significance test of sixth correlation is obtained of 0.000 (below 0.05), the correlation is strong enough to have significance because it is below the value of the coefficient a = 5% (0.05). Thus, it can be concluded that the opinions of 100 respondents / rating may be acceptable to describe the preferences of tourists to travel products Ground Zero Monument peace in Kuta Bali.
(4)
Tabel 4.5 Correlations between observed and estimated preferences
Method Value Sig.
Pearson's R 1.000 .000
Kendall's tau 1.000 .000
5. CONCLUSION
The Tourist preferences towards product on a peace tour Ground Zero Monument Kuta Bali is necessary to provide statue monument (miniature) and historical monuments as a souvenir book, (-0.330), provided adequate monument facilities (-0.302), giving a special place for travelers to pray ( -0.257), packaging products to accommodate the values of peace symbols (-0.210), pack the design and arrangement of good and interesting monuments (-0.067), need to be provided interpreters (guides to explain) monument (-0.050), unnecessary provided the transportation vehicles because tourists are more likely to use private vehicles (-0.050). While the level of interest in the peaceful tourist product in Monument Ground Zero from highest to lowest based attribute utility value is as follows: souvenir (16.509%), physical attractiveness (15.775%), services (14.889%), non-physical attractiveness (14.461%), facilities (13.820%), attractions (12.648%), and transport (11.898).
6.REFERENCES
Abramson,J. and Mizrahi, T. 1994. Examining Social Work/Physician Colaboration ; an Application of Grounded Theory Methods Dalam Blaxter, L. Hughes, C. dan Tight, M. 2001. How To Research. Second Edition. Maidenhead, Berkshire. England. Alih Bahasa Agustina. How To Research Seluk-Beluk Melakukan Riset. PT Indeks Kelompok Gramedia.
Anonim. 2005. Peraturan Daerah Propinsi Tingkat I Bali No. 3 Tahun 2005 Tentang Penetapan Kawasan Pariwisata di Bali.
Ariana, Nyoman. 2011. Peluang Pariwisata Damai di Bali Dalam Putra, Darma dan Pitana I Gde. Hiperdemokrasi Dalam Pembangunan Pariwisata Persembahan Untuk Prof. Ida Bagus Adnyana Manuaba. (hal 71-86). Pustaka Larasan. Denpasar.
Aritonang R. L. R. 2005. Kepuasan Pelanggan Pengukuran dan Penganalisisan dengan SPSS. Jakarta : PT Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
Blaxter, L. Hughes, C. dan Tight, M. 2001. How To Research. Second Edition. Maidenhead, Berkshire. England. Alih Bahasa Agustina. How To Research Seluk-Beluk Melakukan Riset. PT Indeks Kelompok Gramedia.
Chanwick Robin A. (1994) Concepts, Definitions and measures used in travel and tourism research. In Travel Tourism, and Hospitality Research, A handbook for Manager and Researchers.Editor J.R. Brent Ritchie and Charles R. Goeldner second edition. John Wiley and Sons,Inc Canada.
(5)
Dinas Pariwisata Propinsi Bali, 2001. Perkembangan Akomodasi di Propinsi Bali Tahun 1996-2000. Denpasar. Bali.
Gudono, 2012. Analisi Data Multivariat. BPFE. Yogyakarta
Ki Lee Choong, Lawrence J. Bendle, Yoo Shik Yoon, Myung-Ja Kim. 2011. Thanatourism or peace tourism : perceived value at a North Korean Resort From Indigenous Perspective. International Journal of Tourism Reserach Vol 14, issue 1 page 71-90.January/pebruari 2012.
Kim, Samuel Seongseop, et all. 2007.Using Tourism To Promote Peace On The Korean Peninsula. dalam Annal Of Tourism Recearch Vol.34, No. 2, pp291-309.
Kusmayadi dan Sugiarto, E. 2000. Metodologi Penelitian alam Bidang Kepariwisataan. Jakarta : PT Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
Mahagangga, Oka. 2011. Tantangan Keamanan Pariwisata Bali: Kajian Pemetaan Kriminalitas di Daerah Wisata Bali. Dalam Putra, Darma dan Pitana I Gde. Hiperdemokrasi Dalam Pembangunan Pariwisata Persembahan Untuk Prof. Ida Bagus Adnyana Manuaba. Pustaka Larasan. Denpasar.
Mak James. 2008. Developing A Dream Destination : Tourism And Tourism Policy Planning In Hawai. Versa Press. Hawai
Margana Sri. 2011. Kolonialisme Kebudayaan dan Kebalian: Dari Konggres Kebudayaan Bali I Tahun 1937 disampaikan pada Seminar Nasional Kebudayaan Dalam Rangka Dies Natalis UNUD Ke 49. Universitas Udayana Denpasar.
Murni, Ni. N. S. 1995. Pariwisata I. Bandung : Pusat Pengembangan Pendidikan Politeknik. Palguna, A. A. N. 2001. Dinamika Masyarakat Menuju Civil Society (Study Kasus) Objek Wisata Alas Kedaton di Desa Kukuh Kecamatan Marga Kabupaten Tabanan (Tesis). Denpasar : Univesitas Udayana.
Pendit, N. S. 1997. Ilmu Pariwisata Sebuah Pengantar. Jakarta : PT Pradnya Paramita. Pitana, I Gede dkk. 2000. Kuta Cermin Retak Pariwisata Bali. Bali Post, Denpasar Bali. Pitana, I G. Dan Surya D, I. K. 2009. Pengantar Ilmu Pariwisata. CV Andi Offset. Yogyakarta.
Pujani, L.P. K. 2000. Pekerja Anak Pada Sektor Informal Penjual Postcard di Objek Wisata Tanah Lot, Tabanan, Bali (Studi Tentang Pemaknaan kerja Dalam Perspektif Budaya Kewiraswataan ) (Tesis). Denpasar : Universitas Udayana.
Putra, H. S. A (et al), 1998. Model Pariwisata pedesaan Sebagai Alternatif Pembangunan Berkelanjutan. Yogyakarta : Lembaga Penelitian Universitas Gadjah Mada.
Richards G. Wilson Julie. Tourism, Creativity and Development. Routledge. USA and Canada.
(6)
Reisinger, Yvette and Turner Lindsay. 2003. Cross-Cultural Behaviour In Tourism Concepts and Analysis. An imprint of elseiver Science Limited Linacre House. Butter Heinemann. Great Britain
Sharpley. Richard. 2005 Managing The Coutryside for Tourism : a Governance Perspective dalam Pender. Lesley and Sharpley. Richard. The Management of Tourism . SAGE Publication. California.
Spillane. J. J. 1987. Ekonomi Pariwisata Sejarah dan Prosfeknya :Yogyakarta : Kanisius. Surjandari,Isti. 2009. Conjoint Analisis : Konsep dan Aplikasi. Trisakti Jakarta.
Suryasih, Ida Ayu. 2008. Pengelolaan Objek dan Daya Tarik Wisata Berbasis Tri Hita Karana. Dalam Majalah Analisis Pariwisata. Vol. 8, No. 2, 2008 Hal 25-29.
Tom Baum and Jithendran Kokkranikal “ Human Resources Management in Tourism” dalam buku yang berjudul : The Management of Tourism karya : Lesley Pender and Richard Sharpley.
Yoeti, O. A. 1997. Perencanaan Pengembangan Pariwisata, Jakarta : PT. Pradnya Paramita. Zalazar,Noel B. 2006. Building a Culture of Peace Though Tourism : Reflexive and Analytical Notes and Queries. Universitas Humanistica, No. 62. Fcs, Facultad De Ciencias Sociales. http:www.javariana.edu.co. 17 Desember 2008.